Adams, R. 1971. “The Logical Structure of Anselm's Argument.” Philosophical Review 80: 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, R. 1995. “Introductory Note to *1970.” In K. Gödel, Collected Works, vol. 3: Unpublished Essays and Lectures, Feferman, Solomon (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, 388–402.Google Scholar

Almeida, M., and Oppy, G.. 2003. “Sceptical Theism and the Evidential Argument from Evil.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81, no. 4: 496–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, W. 1983. “Christian Experience and Christian Belief.” In Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, N. (eds.), Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Alston, W. 1991/6. “The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 97–125.

Alston, W. 1996. “Some (Temporarily) Final Thoughts on Evidential Arguments from Evil.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 311–32.

Anderson, C. 1990. “Some Emendations on Gödel's Ontological Proof.” Faith and Philosophy 7: 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, R. 1995. “Recent Criticisms and Defences of Pascal's Wager.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 37: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annice, M. 1956. “Logic and Mystery in the Quarta Via of St. Thomas.” Thomist 19: 22–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armour, L. 1980. “Ideas, Causes and God.” Sophia 19: 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. 1989. “C. B. Martin, Counterfactuals, Causality, and Conditionals.” In Heil, J. (ed.), Cause, Mind and Reality: Essays Honouring C. B. Martin. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D., and McCall, S.. 1989. “God's Lottery.” Analysis 49: 223–4.Google Scholar

Austin, W. 1985. “Philo's Reversal.” Philosophical Topics 13: 103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbour, I. 1966. Issues in Philosophy of Religion. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1972. The Ontological Argument. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrow, J., and Tipler, F.. 1986. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baumer, W. 1969. “Kant on Cosmological Arguments.” In Beck, L. (ed.), Kant Studies Today. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar

Behe, M. 1996a. Darwin's Black Box. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Behe, M. 1996b. “Evidence for Intelligent Design from Biochemistry.” Http://www.discovery.org/crsc, accessed May 15, 2004.

Behe, M. 2001. “The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis: Breaking Rules.” Philosophia Christi 3: 165–79.Google Scholar

Benacerraf, P. 1962. “Tasks, Supertasks, and the Modern Eleatics.” Journal of Philosophy 59: 765–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergmann, M. 2001. “Sceptical Theism and Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil.” Nous 35, no. 2: 278–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, D. 1988. A History of Atheism in Britain: From Hobbes to Russell. London: CroomHelm.Google Scholar

Bigelow, J. 1988. The Reality of Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bobik, J. 1968. “The First Part of the Third Way.” Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 17: 142–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobik, J. 1972. “Further Reflections on the First Part of the Third Way.” Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 20: 166–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobik, J. 1987. “Aquinas' Fourth Way and the Approximating Relation.” Thomist 51: 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bostrom, N. 2002. Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. 1984. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Brady, J. 1974. “Note on the Fourth Way.” New Scholasticism 48: 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecher, B. 1976. “Descartes' Causal Argument for the Existence of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7: 418–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewster, L. 1974. “How to Know Enough about the Unknown Faculty.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 366–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bringsjord, S. 1986. “Swinburne's Argument from Consciousness.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19: 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, G. 1984. “A Defence of Pascal's Wager.” Religious Studies 20: 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. 1965. “A Medieval Analysis of Infinity.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 3: 242–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. 1982. “A Reply to Kelly on Aquinas' Third Way.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13: 225–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, R. 1987. “Meynell's Arguments for the Intelligibility of the Universe.” Religious Studies 23: 183–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byl, J. 1994. “On Pascal's Wager and Infinite Utilities.” Faith and Philosophy 11: 467–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahn, S. 1976. “Cacodaemony.” Analysis 37: 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, R. 1976. From Belief to Understanding. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar

Caputo, J. 1974. “Kant's Refutation of the Cosmological Argument.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 42: 686–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cargile, J. 1966. “Pascal's Wager.” Philosophy 41: 250–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4. Reprinted in Carnap (1956).

Carnap, R. 1956. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Centore, F. 1980. “Camus, Pascal, and the Absurd.” New Scholasticism 54: 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chad, A. 1997. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Dialogue 36: 555–62.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, T. 2000. “On Behalf of the Devil: A Parody of St. Anselm Revisited.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100: 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, M. 1965. St. Anselm's Proslogion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clack, B., and Clack, B.. 1998. The Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Clarke, B. 1974. “The Argument from Design – A Piece of Abductive Reasoning.” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 5: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, B. 1979. “The Argument from Design.” Sophia 18: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, R. 1988. “Vicious Infinite Regress Arguments.” In Tomberlin (1988), 369–80.

Clatterbaugh, K. 1980. “Descartes' Causal Likeness Principle.” Philosophical Review 89: 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, P. 1996. “The Theistic Argument from Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy.” International Philosophical Quarterly 36: 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, R. 1999. “The Fine-Tuning Design Argument: A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God.” In Murray, M. (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 67–72.Google Scholar

Collins, R. 2003. “Evidence for Fine-Tuning.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. London: Routledge, 178–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, T. 1954. “Basis for the Third Proof of the Existence of God.” Thomist 17: 281–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, D. 1974. “Possibility and Infinite Time: A Logical Paradox in St. Thomas' Third Way.” International Philosophical Quarterly 14: 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, D. 1983. “Concerning Infinite Chains, Infinite Trains, and Borrowing a Typewriter.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14: 71–86.Google Scholar

Conway, D. 1984. “‘It Would Have Happened Already’: On One Argument for a First Cause.” Analysis 44: 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornman, J., and Lehrer, K.. 1968. Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cox, H. 1974. “Composition and the Cosmological Argument: A Trivial Issue.” New Scholasticism 48: 365–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1979a. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1979b. “Whitrow, Popper, and the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30: 166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1985. “Professor Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 20: 367–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55: 453–5.Google Scholar

Craig, W. 1991a. “The Kalām Cosmological Argument and the Hypothesis of a Quiescent Universe.” Faith and Philosophy 8: 104–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1991b. “Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1991c. “Time and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 31: 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1992a. “God and the Initial Singularity.” Faith and Philosophy 9: 238–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1992b. “The Origin and Creation of the Universe: A Reply to Adolf Grünbaum.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43: 233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1992c. “Philosophical and Scientific Pointers to Creation Ex Nihilo.” In Geivett, D. and Sweetman, B. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Craig, W. 1993a. “The Caused Beginning of the Universe: A Response to Quentin Smith.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 623–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1993b. “Graham Oppy on the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Sophia 32: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1994a. “A Response to Grünbaum on Creation and Big Bang Cosmology.” Philosophia Naturalis 31: 237–49.Google Scholar

Craig, W. 1994b. “Professor Grünbaum on Creation” Erkenntnis 40: 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1997a. “In Defence of the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Faith and Philosophy 14: 236–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1997b. “Hartle-Hawking Cosmology and Atheism.” Analysis 57: 291–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1998. “Theism and the Origin of the Universe.” Erkenntnis 48: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 1999. “A Swift and Simple Refutation of the Kalām Cosmological Argument?” Religious Studies 35: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. 2000. “Naturalism and Cosmology.” In Craig, W. and Moreland, J. (eds.), Naturalism: A Critical Analysis. London: Routledge, 215–52.Google Scholar

Craig, W. 2003a. “The Cosmological Argument.” In Copan, P. and Moser, P. (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. London: Routledge, 112–31.Google Scholar

Craig, W. 2003b. “Design and the Anthropic Fine-Tuning of the Universe.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. London: Routledge, 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, W., and McLeod, M., eds. 1990. Rational Theism: The Logic of a Worldview. Lewiston: N. Y. Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar

Craig, W., and Smith, Q.. 1993. Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Crawford, P. 1981. “Is the Cosmological Argument Dependent upon the Ontological Argument?” Sophia 20: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, P. 1975. “Pascal's Wager: The Second Argument.” Southern Journal of Religion 13: 31–46.Google Scholar

Dalton, P. 1976. “Pascal's Wager: The First Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7: 346–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, C. 1997. “God, Demon, Good, Evil.” Journal of Value Inquiry 31, no. 2: 177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davey, K., and Clifton, R.. 2001. “Insufficient Reason and the ‘New Cosmological Argument’.” Religious Studies 37: 485–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, H. 1987. Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, B. 1993. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, J. 1987. “The Design Argument, Cosmic ‘Fine-Tuning’, and the Anthropic Principle.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22: 139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, S. 1997. God, Reason and Theistic Proofs. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Day, T. 1987. “Aquinas on Infinite Regress.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22: 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delahunty, R. 1980. “Descartes' Cosmological Argument.” Philosophical Quarterly 30: 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deltete, R. 1998. “Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Philosophy 73: 490–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deltete, R., and Guy, R.. 1997. “Hartle-Hawking Cosmology and Unconditional Probabilities.” Analysis 57: 304–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dembski, W. 1998. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dembski, W. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Devine, P. 1975. “The Perfect Island, the Devil, and Existent Unicorns.” American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 255–60.Google Scholar

Dewan, L. 1982. “The Distinctiveness of St. Thomas' ‘Third Way’.” Modern Schoolman 57: 201–18.Google Scholar

Dewan, L. 1991. “The Interpretation of St. Thomas's Third Way.” In Littera, sensus, sententia, Studi in onore del Prof. Clemente J. Vansteenkiste O. P., ed., Lobato, A., O. P. Milan: Massimo, 201–18.Google Scholar

Dilley, F. 1970. “Descartes' Cosmological Argument.” Monist 54: 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dilley, F. 1976. “Misunderstanding the Cosmological Argument of St. Thomas.” New Scholasticism 50: 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doolittle, R. 1997. “A Delicate Balance.” Boston Review (February/March): 28–9.Google Scholar

Doore, G. 1980. “The Argument from Design: Some Better Reasons for Agreeing with Hume.” Religious Studies 16: 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Draper, P. 1997. “The Kalām Cosmological Argument.” In Pojman, L. (ed.), Philosophy of Religion, 3rd ed. Belmont: Wadsworth, 42–7.Google Scholar

Duerlinger, J. 1982. “Unspoken Connections in the Design Argument.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42: 519–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duff, A. 1986. “Pascal's Wager and Infinite Utilities.” Analysis 46: 107–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, C. 2003. “Do Vague Probabilities Really Scotch Pascal's Wager?” Philosophical Studies 112: 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupré, L. 1972. “The Cosmological Argument after Kant.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3: 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durrant, M. 1969. “St. Thomas' Third Way.” Religious Studies 4: 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Earman, J. 1995. Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Earman, J., and J. Norton. 1996. “Infinite Pains: The Trouble with Supertasks.” In Morton, A. and Stich, S. (eds.), Benacerraf and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Edwards, R. 1968. “Composition and the Cosmological Argument.” Mind 78: 115–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, R. 1971. “The Validity of Aquinas' Third Way.” New Scholasticism 45: 117–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, R. 1973. “Another Visit to the Third Way.” New Scholasticism 47: 100–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eells, E. 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55: 453–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliot, R., and Smith, M.. 1978. “Descartes, God and the Evil Spirit.” Sophia 17: 33–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fakhry, M. 1959. “The Classical Islamic Arguments for the Existence of God.” The Muslim World 49: 133–45.Google Scholar

Faricy, R. 1957. “Establishment of the Basic Principle of the Fifth Way.” New Scholasticism 31: 189–208.Google Scholar

Feinberg, J., ed. 1989. Reason and Responsibility, 7th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Ferraiolo, W. 2000. “The Heaven Problem.” Southwest Philosophy Review 16: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fetzer, J., ed. 1984. Principles of Philosophical Reasoning. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar

Finili, A. 1954. “Recent Works in the Tertia Via.” Dominican Studies 7: 22–47.Google Scholar

Fitelson, B., Stephens, C., and Sober, E.. 1999. “How Not to Detect Design – Critical Notice: Dembski (1998).” Philosophy of Science 66: 472–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, F. 1981. “The Onus of Proof in Arguments about the Problem of Evil.” Religious Studies 17: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flage, D., and Bonnen, C.. 1989. “Descartes' Factitious Ideas of God.” Modern Schoolman 66: 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flew, A. 1960. “Is Pascal's Wager the Only Safe Bet?” Rationalist Annual 76. Reprinted in Flew (1984).

Flew, A. 1984. God, Freedom and Immortality. Buffalo: Prometheus.Google Scholar

Flint, T. 1998. Divine Providence. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Forrest, P. 1982. “Occam's Razor and Possible Worlds.” Monist 65: 456–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrest, P. 1983. “Priest on the Argument for Design.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 84–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friquegnon, M. 1975. “God and Other Programs.” Religious Studies 15: 83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaine, S. 2003. Will There Be Free Will in Heaven?London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

Gale, R. 1991. On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gale, R. 1996. “Some Difficulties in Theistic Treatments of Evil.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 206–18.

Gale, R. 1998. “Review of Oppy, Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58: 715–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, R., and Pruss, A.. 1999. “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35: 461–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, R., and , A. Pruss. 2003. “A Response to Oppy, and to Davey and Clifton.” Religious Studies 38: 89–99.Google Scholar

Gaskin, J. 1976. “The Design Argument: Hume's Critique of Pure Reason.” Religious Studies 12: 331–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geanakoplos, J., and Sebenius, J.. 1983. “Don't Bet on It.” Journal of American Statistical Association 78: 424–6.Google Scholar

Gellman, J. 1994. “Experiencing God's Infinity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31: 53–61.Google Scholar

Gillespie, N. 1979. Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Glass, M., and Wolfe, J.. 1986. “Paley's Design Argument for God.” Sophia 25: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, S. 1989. “Craig's Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Faith and Philosophy 6: 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golding, J. 1994. “Pascal's Wager.” Modern Schoolman 71: 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, L. 1971. “Ghazālī's Argument from Creation.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 2: 67–85, 168–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. 1993. Eight Little Piggies. New York: Norton, chapter 8: “Darwin and Paley Meet the Invisible Hand,” 138–52.Google Scholar

Grave, S. 1976. “Hume's Criticism of the Argument from Design.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 30: 64–78.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 1990. “The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology.” In Leslie, J. (ed.), Physical Cosmology and Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 92–112.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 1991. “Creation as a Pseudo-Explanation in Current Physical Cosmology.” Erkenntnis 35: 233–54.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 1994. “Some Comments on William Craig's ‘Creation and Big Bang Cosmology’.” Philosophia Naturalis 31: 225–36.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 1996. “Theological Misinterpretations of Current Physical Cosmology.” Foundations of Physics 26: 523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 2000. “A New Critique of Theological Interpretations of Physical Cosmology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. 1972. “The Logic of Pascal's Wager.” American Philosophical Quarterly 9: 186–92.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1987. “The Inverse Gambler's Fallacy: The Argument from Design. The Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler's Universes.” Mind 76: 331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hájek, A. 2000. “Objecting Vaguely to Pascal's Wager.” Philosophical Studies 98: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hájek, A. 2003. “Waging War on Pascal's Wager.” Philosophical Review 112: 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hájek, A. 2004. “Pascal's Wager.” In Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/pascal-wager, accessed June 15, 2004.Google Scholar

Haldane, J. 1983. “A Benign Regress.” Analysis 43: 115–16.Google Scholar

Hardy, A. 1975. The Biology of God. London: Cape.Google Scholar

Harman, G. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press (Bradford Books).Google Scholar

Harris, W.. 1999. “A Randomised, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes of Patients Admitted to a Coronary Unit.” Archives of Internal Medicine 159: 2273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, C. 1974. “Totalities and the Logic of First Cause Arguments.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, F. 1961. “Some Brief Remarks Concerning the Quinque Via of St. Thomas.” Franciscan Studies 21: 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazen, A. 1999. “On Gödel's Ontological Proof.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76, no. 3: 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hebblethwaite, B. 1986. “Mellor's ‘Bridge-Hand’ Argument.” Religious Studies 22: 473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hick, J., 1970. Arguments for the Existence of God. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, J. and Martin, C.. 1953/4. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 14: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holcomb, H. 1995. “To Bet the Impossible Bet.” International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 35: 65–79.Google Scholar

Holder, R. 2002. “Fine Tuning, Multiple Universes, and Theism.” Nous 36: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hourani, G. 1958. “The Dialogue between Al Ghazālī and the Philosophers on the Origin of the World.” The Muslim World 48: 183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Snyder, D., ed. 1996a. The Evidential Argument from Evil. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Howard-Snyder, D. 1996b. “Introduction.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), ⅺ–ⅹⅹ.

Howard-Snyder, D. 1996c. “The Argument from Inscrutable Evil.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 286–310.

Hughes, C. 1989. On a Complex Theory of a Simple God. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, G. 1995. The Nature of God. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Humphrey, T. 1974. “How Descartes Avoids the Hidden Faculties Trap.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 371–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurlbutt, R. 1965. Hume, Newton and the Design Argument. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Immerwahr, J. 1982. “Descartes' Two Cosmological Proofs.” New Scholasticism 56: 346–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jack, H. 1964. “A Recent Attempt to Prove God's Existence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25: 575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, F. 1995. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Jordan, J. 1991a. “Duff and the Wager.” Analysis 51: 174–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, J. 1991b. “The Many-Gods Objection and Pascal's Wager.” International Philosophical Quarterly 31: 309–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, J. 1993a. “Pascal's Wager and the Problem of Infinite Utilities.” Faith and Philosophy 10: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, J. 1993b. “Pascal's Wager and the Rationality of Devotion to God.” Faith and Philosophy 10: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, J., ed. 1994a. Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal's Wager. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Jordan, J. 1994b. “The St. Petersburg Paradox and Pascal's Wager.” Philosophia 23: 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, B. 1997. “The Cosmological Argument without the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Faith and Philosophy 14: 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, C. 1981. “Some Fallacies in the First Movement of Aquinas' Third Way.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12: 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, C. 1982. “The Third Way and the Possible Eternity of the World.” New Scholasticism 56: 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, A. 1968. “The Idea of God.” In Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy. New York: Random House, 126–45.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1969. The Five Ways: St. Thomas Aquinas' Proofs of God's Existence. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

King-Farlow, J. 1975. “The First Way in Physical and Moral Space.” Thomist 39: 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knasas, J. 1978. “‘Necessity’ in the Tertia Via.” New Scholasticism 52: 373–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knasas, J. 1980. “Making Sense of the Tertia Via.” New Scholasticism 54: 476–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kondoleon, T. 1980. “The Third Way: Encore.” Thomist 44: 325–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koons, R. 1997. “A New Look at the Cosmological Argument.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 193–211.Google Scholar

Koons, R. 2001. “Defeasible Reasoning, Special Pleading and the Cosmological Argument: A Reply to Oppy.” Faith and Philosophy 18: 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kragh, H. 1996. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development fo Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, N., ed. 1982. Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kvanvig, J. 1997. “Heaven and Hell”. In Quinn, P. and Taliaferro, C. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell, 562–8.Google Scholar

Kwang, C., Wirth, D., and Lobo, R.. 2001. “Does Prayer Influence the Success of in Vitro Fertilisation Transfer? Report of a Masked, Randomised Trial.” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46: 781–7.Google Scholar

Croix, R. 1972. Proslogion II and III: A Third Interpretation of Anselm's Argument. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Landsberg, P. 1971. “Gambling on God.” Mind 80: 100–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langtry, B. 1999. “Review of Oppy, Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.” Sophia 36: 147–50.Google Scholar

Lavine, S. 1994. Understanding the Infinite. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leslie, J. 1985. “Modern Cosmology and the Creation of Life.” In McMullin, E. (ed.), Evolution and Creation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 91–120.Google Scholar

Leslie, J. 1989. Universes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leslie, J., ed. 1990. Physical Cosmology and Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1970. “Anselm and Actuality.” Nous 4: 175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, D. 1976. “Survival and Identity.” In Rorty, A. (ed.), The Identities of Persons. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 17–40.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1999. Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linehan, J. 1959. “Modern Science and the Proof from Motion of the Existence of a Theistic God.” Franciscan Studies 19: 128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorca, D. 1995. “A Critique of Quentin Smith's Atheistic Argument from Big Bang Cosmology.” Philosophy 70: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lycan, W., and G. Schlesinger. 1989. “You Bet Your Life.” In Feinberg (1989), 82–90.

Mabey, R. 1971. “Confusion and the Cosmological Argument.” Mind 80: 124–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntosh, D. 1994. “Could God Have Made the Big Bang? (On Theistic Counterfactuals).” Dialogue 33: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacIntosh, J. 2000. “Is Pascal's Wager Self-Defeating?.” Sophia 39: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. 1955. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64: 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. 1982. The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madden, E., and Hare, P.. 1968. Evil and the Concept of God. Springfield, Ill.: C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Makinde, M. 1985. “Pascal's Wager and the Atheist's Dilemma.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 17: 115–29.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. 1960. “Anselm's Ontological Arguments.” Philosophical Review 69: 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, W. 1972. “The Ontological Presuppositions of the Ontological Argument.” Review of Metaphysics 26: 260–77.Google Scholar

Manson, N. 2000a. “Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument.” Religious Studies 36: 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, N. 2000b. “There Is No Adequate Definition of ‘Fine-Tuned for Life’.” Inquiry 43: 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, N., ed. 2003. God and Design. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manson, N., and Thrush, M.. 2003. “Fine-Tuning, Multiple Universes and the ‘This Universe’ Objection.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markosian, N. 1995. “On the Argument from Quantum Cosmology against Theism.” Analysis 55: 247–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmura, M. 1957. “The Logical Role of the Argument from Time in the Tahāfut's Second Proof for the World's Pre-Eternity.” The Muslim World 47: 306–14.Google Scholar

Martin, C. 1959. Religious Belief. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, M. 1975. “On Four Critiques of Pascal's Wager.” Sophia 14: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, M. 1983. “Pascal's Wager as an Argument for Not Believing in God.” Religious Studies 19: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, M. 1990. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, M. 1997. “Problems with Heaven.” Http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/michael_martin/heaven.html, accessed June 29, 2004.

Matson, M. 1965. The Existence of God. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mautner, T. 1969. “Aquinas' Third Way.” American Philosophical Quarterly 6: 298–304.Google Scholar

McClelland, R., and Deltete, R.. 2000. “Divine Causation.” Faith and Philosophy 17: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrew, T., McGrew, L., and Vestrup, E.. 2001. “Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Sceptical View.” Mind 110: 127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, R. 1984. “Necessary Agnosticism?” Analysis 44: 198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherson, T. 1957. “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 32: 219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherson, T. 1972. The Argument from Design. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McQuinn, J. 1978. “The Third Way to God: A New Approach.” Thomist 42: 50–68.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. 1973. “God and Probability.” In Yandell, K. (ed.), God, Man and Religion. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Meyer, R. 1987. “God Exists!” Nous 21: 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miethe, T. 1979. “The Cosmological Argument: A Research Bibliography.” New Scholasticism 53: 285–305.Google Scholar

Miller, K. 1999. Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books.Google Scholar

Miller, K. 2003. “Answering the Biochemical Argument from Design.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. London: Routledge, 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monk, N. 1997. “Conceptions of Space-Time: Problems and Possible Solutions.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, no. 1: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moody, T. 1996. Does God Exist?Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Moreland, J. 2003. “A Response to a Platonistic and to a Set-Theoretic Objection to the Kalam Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 39: 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morreall, J. 1979. “Aquinas' Fourth Way.” Sophia 18: 20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, T. 1986. “Pascalian Wagering.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16: 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, W. 1999. “Must the Past Have a Beginning?.” Philo 2: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, W. 2002a. “Craig on the Actual Infinite.” Religious Studies 38: 147–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, W. 2002b. “Creation Ex Nihilo and the Big Bang.” Philo 5: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mougin, G., and Sober, E.. 1994. “Betting against Pascal's Wager.” Nous 27: 382–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Y., Oppy, G., and Trakakis, N.. 2004. “Salvation in Heaven?” Philosophical Papers 33: 1, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narveson, J. 1965. “On a New Argument from Design.” Journal of Philosophy 62: 223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Natoli, C. 1983. “The Role of the Wager in Pascal's Apologetics.” New Scholasticism 57: 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, H. 1993. “Kant on Arguments Cosmological and Ontological.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67: 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, K. 1978. “Evolution and the Argument from Design.” Religious Studies 14: 423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

New, C. 1993. “Antitheism.” Ratio 6: 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, J. 1870. An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent. Oxford: Clarendon, 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholl, L. 1979. “Pascal's Wager: The Bet Is Off.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39: 274–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, D. 1968. “Descartes on Unknown Faculties: An Essential Inconsistency.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6: 245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, D. 1974. “Descartes' Inconsistency: A Reply.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 509–20.Google Scholar

Norton, D. 1978. “A Reply to Professor Stevens.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16: 338–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noxon, J. 1964. “Hume's Agnosticism.” Philosophical Review 73: 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Briant, W. 1967. “A New Argument from Design?” Sophia 6: 30–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Briant, W. 1979. “Is Descartes' Evil Spirit Finite or Infinite?” Sophia 18: 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oderberg, D. 2002a. “Traversal of the Infinite, the ‘Big Bang’, and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 303–34.Google Scholar

Oderberg, D. 2002b. “The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Reply to Graham Oppy.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 351–60.Google Scholar

O'Donoghue, D. 1953. “Analysis of the Tertia Via of St. Thomas.” Irish Theological Quarterly 20: 129–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Donoghue, D. 1969. “The First Part of the Third Way: Reply.” Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 18: 172–7.Google Scholar

Olding, A. 1971. “The Argument from Design – A Reply to R. G. Swinburne.” Religious Studies 7: 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olding, A. 1973. “Design – A Further Reply to R. G. Swinburne.” Religious Studies 9: 229–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Leary-Hawthorne, J., and Cortens, A.. 1995. “Towards Ontological Nihilism.” Philosophical Studies 79, no. 2: 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheimer, P., and E. Zalta. 1991. “On the Logic of the Ontological Argument.” In Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 5: The Philosophy of Religion. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview, 509–29.Google Scholar

Oppy, G. 1990. “On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30: 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1991. “Craig, Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 27: 189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1994. “Weak Agnosticism Defended.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36: 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1995a. “Inverse Operations with Transfinite Numbers and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” International Philosophical Quarterly 35, no. 2: 219–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1995b. “Kalām Cosmological Arguments: Reply to Professor Craig.” Sophia 34: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1995c. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oppy, G. 1995d. “Professor William Craig's Criticisms of Critiques of Kalām Cosmological Arguments by Paul Davies, Stephen Hawking, and Adolf Grünbaum.” Faith and Philosophy 12: 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1996a. “Gödelian Ontological Arguments.” Analysis 56, no. 4 (October) 1: 226–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1996b. “Hume and the Argument for Biological Design.” Biology and Philosophy 11: 519–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1996c. “Ontological Arguments.” Stanford Electronic Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments (revised 2002). Accessed March 2, 2004.

Oppy, G. 1996d. “Pascal's Wager Is a Possible Bet (But Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40: 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1996e. “Review of W. Craig and Q. Smith, Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Faith and Philosophy 13: 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1997a. “Countable Fusion Not Yet Proven Guilty: It May Be the Whiteheadian Account of Space Whatdunnit.” Analysis 57, no. 4: 249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1997b. “Pantheism, Quantification, and Mereology.” Monist 80, no. 2: 320–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1997c. “Some Questions about ‘The Hartle-Hawking Cosmology’.” Sophia 36, no. 1: 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 1999. “Koons' Cosmological Argument.” Faith and Philosophy 16: 378–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2000a. “Humean Supervenience?” Philosophical Studies 101, no. 1: 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2000b. “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument’.” Religious Studies 36: 345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2000c. “Response to Gettings.” Analysis 60: 363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2001a. “Reply to Langtry.” Sophia 40: 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2001b. “Time, Successive Addition, and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philosophia Christi 3: 181–91.Google Scholar

Oppy, G. 2002a. “Arguing about the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philo 5, no. 1: 34–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2002b. “More Than a Flesh Wound: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 2: 1–11. Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2002c. “Paley's Argument for Design.” Philo 5, no. 2: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2002d. “The Tristram Shandy Paradox: A Response to David S. Oderberg.” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 2: 335–49.Google Scholar

Oppy, G. 2003a. “From the Tristram Shandy Paradox to the Christmas Shandy Paradox: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 3: 1–24. Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org.Google Scholar

Oppy, G. 2004a. “Arguments from Moral Evil.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56: 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2004b. “Faulty Reasoning about Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments.” Faith and Philosophy 21, no. 2: 242–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2004c. “God, God* and God′.” In Fisher, A. and Ramsay, H. (eds.), Faith and Reason: Friends or Foes in the New Millennium? Hindmarsh: ATF Press, 171–86.Google Scholar

Oppy, G. 2004d. “Review of God and Design, edited by Neil Manson.” Sophia 43, no. 1: 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. 2006. Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppy, G. In preparation. Describing Gods. Unpublished ms.

Owens, J. 1952/3. “Conclusion of the Prima Via.” Modern Schoolman 30: 33–53, 109–21, 203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, J. 1971. “‘Cause of Necessity’ in Aquinas' Tertia Via.” Medieval Studies 33: 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, J. 1974. “Aquinas and the Five Ways.” Monist 58: 16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, J. 1980. “‘Quandoque’ and ‘Aliquando’ in Aquinas' Tertia Via.” New Scholasticism 54: 447–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paley, W. 1890/1805. Natural Theology. London: Gilbert and Rivington.Google Scholar

Parent, W. 1976. “Philo's Confession.” Philosophical Quarterly 26: 63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Paul, G. 2005. “Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies.” Journal of Religion and Society 7: 1–17.Google Scholar

Pearl, L. 1970. “Hume's Criticism of the Argument from Design.” Monist 54: 270–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penelhum, T. 1964. “Pascal's Wager.” Journal of Religion 44: 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1967. God and Other Minds. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1979a. “Is Belief in God Rational?” In Delaney, C. (ed.), Rationality and Religious Belief. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2–29.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1979b. “The Probabilistic Argument from Evil.” Philosophical Studies 35: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1980. Does God Have a Nature?Milwaukee, Minn.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1983. “Reason and Belief in God.” In Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, N. (eds.), Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. 1988/96. “Epistemic Probability.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 69–96.

Pomerlau, W. 1985. “Does Reason Demand That God Be Infinite?” Sophia 24: 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prado, C. 1971. “The Third Way Revisited.” New Scholasticism 45: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prevost, R. 1990. “Classical Theism and the Kalam Principle.” In Craig, W. and McLeod, M. (eds.), Rational Theism: The Logic of a Worldview. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen, 113–25.Google Scholar

Price, H. 1988. “Review of Change in View.” Philosophical Books 29: 38–41.Google Scholar

Price, H. 1992. “Metaphysical Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophy 89, no. 8: 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Priest, G. 1981. “The Argument from Design.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 422–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quinn, J. 1978. “The Third Way to God: A New Approach.” Thomist 42: 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, J. 1982. “A Few Reflections on ‘The Third Way: Encore’.” Thomist 46: 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rashdall, H. 1907. “The Moral Argument for the Existence of God.” Reprinted in Hick, J. (ed.) (1964), Classical and Contemporary Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 268–73.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, B. 1972. The Cosmological Argument: A ReassessmentSpringfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Remnant, P. 1959. “Kant and the Cosmological Argument.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37: 152–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rescher, N. 1985. Pascal's Wager. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Ross, J. 1969. Philosophical Theology. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Rowe, W. 1975. The Cosmological Argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rowe, W. 1979. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 335–41.Google Scholar

Rowe, W. 1984. “Rationalistic Theology and Some Principles of Explanation.” Faith and Philosophy 1: 357–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, W. 1986. “Evil and the Theistic Hypothesis.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, W. 1988. “Response to Dicker.” Faith and Philosophy 5: 203–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, W. 1991. “Ruminations about Evil.” Noûs, supp. 5: 69–88.Google Scholar

Rowe, W. 1995. “Religion within the Bounds of Naturalism.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38: 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, W. 1996. “The Evidential Argument from Evil: A Second Look.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 262–85.Google Scholar

Rowe, W. 2001. “Sceptical Theism: A Response to Bergmann.” Noûs 35: 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. 1977. “William Whewell and the Argument for Design.” Monist 54: 244–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruse, M. 1979. The Darwinian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. 2003. “Modern Biologists and the Argument from Design.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. London: Routledge, 308–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Lord B. 1927. “Why I Am Not a Christian.” Rationalist Press Association Ltd. London: Watts and Co.

Russell, B. 1989. “The Persistent Problem of Evil.” Faith and Philosophy 6: 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, B. 1996. “Defenceless.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 193–205.

Ryan, J. 1945. “The Wager in Pascal and Others.” New Scholasticism 19: 233–50. Reprinted in Jordan (1994b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadowsky, J. 1988. “Did Darwin Destroy the Design Argument?” International Philosophical Quarterly 28: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salamucha, J. 1958. “The Proof ‘Ex Motu’ for the Existence of God: Logical Analysis of St. Thomas' Arguments.” New Scholasticism 32: 334–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmon, W. 1978. “Religion and Science: A New Look at Hume's Dialogues.” Philosophical Studies 33: 143–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanford, D. 1967. “Degrees of Perfection, Argument for the Existence of God.” In Edwards, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 324–6.Google Scholar

Schindler, D. 2002. “Freedom beyond Our Choosing: Augustine on the Will and Its Objects.” Communio: International Catholic Review 29: 4–12.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, G. 1973. “Probabilistic Arguments for Divine Design.” Philosophia 3: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlesinger, G. 1983. “Theism and Confirmation.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64: 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoen, E. 1990. “The Sensory Presentation of Divine Infinity.” Faith and Philosophy 7: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sennett, J. 1999. “Is There Freedom in Heaven?” Faith and Philosophy 16: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Smart, J. 1955. “The Existence of God.” In Flew, A. and MacIntyre, A. (eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Smith, Q. 1985. “Kant and the Beginning of the World.” New Scholasticism 59: 339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1987. “Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 54: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1988. “The Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Philosophy of Science 55: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1991. “Atheism, Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1993a. “A Defence of the Cosmological Argument for God's Non-Existence.” In Craig, W. and Smith, Q., Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Clarendon, 232–55.Google Scholar

Smith, Q. 1993b. “The Concept of a Cause of the Universe.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1993c. “Reply to Craig: The Possible Infinitude of the Past.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33: 109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1994a. “Did the Big Bang Have a Cause?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 649–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1994b. “Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism.” Analysis 54: 236–43.Google Scholar

Smith, Q. 1995a. “A Defence of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26: 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1995b. “Internal and External Causal Explanation of the Universe.” Philosophical Studies 79: 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1997a. “Quantum Cosmology's Implication of Atheism.” Analysis 57: 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1997b. “Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists.” Philosophy 72: 125–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 1999. “The Reason the Universe Exists Is That It Caused Itself to Exist.” Philosophy 74: 579–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Q. 2000. “Problem's with John Earman's Attempt to Reconcile Theism with General Relativity.” Erkenntnis 52: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobel, J. 1987. “Gödel's Ontological Proof.” In Thomson, J. J. (ed.), On Being and Saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 241–61.Google Scholar

Sobel, J. 1996. “Pascalian Wagers.” Synthese 108: 11–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobel, J. 2004. Logic and Theism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sober, E. 1993. The Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar

Sober, E. 2003. “The Design Argument.” In Manson, N. (ed.), God and Design. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solon, T. 1973. “The Logic of Aquinas' Tertia Via.” Mind 82: 598–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation and the Continuum. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Stainsby, H. 1967. “Descartes' Argument for God.” Sophia 6: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, E. 1990. “God, the Demon, and the Status of Theologies.” American Philosophical Quarterly 27: 163–7.Google Scholar

Stevens, J. 1978. “Unknown Faculties and Descartes' First Proof of the Existence of God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16: 334–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stich, S. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stump, E. 1999. “The Problem of Evil.” Faith and Philosophy 2: 392–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, T. 1990. “Coming to Be without a Cause.” Philosophy 65: 261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, T. 1994. “On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith.” Dialogue 33: 325–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweeney, E. 1993. “Thomas Aquinas' Double Metaphysics of Simplicity and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33: 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1966. “The Beginning of the Universe.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40: 125–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1968. “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1969. “The Christian Wager.” Religious Studies 4: 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1972. “The Argument from Design – A Defence.” Religious Studies 8: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1977. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1979. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1983. “A Theodicy of Heaven and Hell.” In Freddoso, A. (ed.), The Existence and Nature of God. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1994. The Christian God. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, R. 1996. Is There a God?Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taliaferro, C. 1992. “Imaginary Evil: A Sceptic's Wager.” Philosophia 21: 221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taliaferro, C. 1998. Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. 1997. “Kalām: A Swift Argument from Origins to a First Cause?” Religious Studies 33: 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, R. 1963. Metaphysics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Tennant, F. 1969. Philosophical Theology, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tomberlin, J., ed. 1988. Philosophical Perspectives 2. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview.Google Scholar

Tooley, M. 1970. “Does the Cosmological Argument Entail the Ontological Argument?” Monist 54: 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tooley, M. 1981. “Plantinga's Defence of the Ontological Argument.” Mind 90: 422–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, M. 1968. “Deciding for God – the Bayesian Support of Pascal's Wager.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urban, L. 1984. “Understanding St. Thomas' Fourth Way.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 1: 281–95.Google Scholar

Fraassen, B. 1995. “‘World’ Is Not a Count Noun.” Nous 29, no. 2: 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Inwagen, P. 1991/6. “The Problem of Evil, the Problem of Air, and the Problem of Silence.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 151–74.

Wainwright, W. 1982. “Critical Notice of The Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Nous 16: 328–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, W. 1956. “Newtonian Antinomies against the Prima Via.” Thomist 19: 151–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, W. 1975. “The First Way: A Rejoinder.” Thomist 39: 375–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walls, J. 2002. Heaven: The Logic of Eternal Joy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, R. 2000. “Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes.” Nous 34: 260–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, B. 1978. “God.” In Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 130–62.Google Scholar

Wilson, P. 1991. “What Is the Explanandum of the Anthropic Principle?” American Philosophical Quarterly 28: 167–73.Google Scholar

Wolfson, H. 1966. “Patristic Arguments against the Eternity of the World.” Harvard Theological Review 59: 354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfson, H. 1976. The Philosophy of the Kalām. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, N. 1983. “Can Belief in God Be Rational If It Has No Foundations?” In Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, N. (eds.), Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Wright, T. 1951. “Necessary and Contingent Being in St. Thomas.” New Scholasticism 25: 439–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wykstra, S. 1984. “The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of ‘Appearance’.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wykstra, S. 1996. “Rowe's Noseeum Arguments from Evil.” In Howard-Snyder (1996a), 126–50.

Yarvin, H. 1976. “The Will to Come Out All Right.” Religious Studies 12: 303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar