Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T01:04:08.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Rationing and the Problem of Legitimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Keith Syrett
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

The instability of explicit forms of rationing: tragic choices

In their well-known work on ‘tragic choices’, Guido Calabresi and Philip Bobbit provide a means by which we may better understand the instability which is generated by strategies of explicit rationing of the type outlined in the preceding chapter. While the authors of this text eschew simple distinctions between those choices which are ‘tragic’ and those which are merely ‘difficult’, it is notable that they consider the provision of haemodialysis machines to represent the ‘paradigmatic’ example of the tragic choice, and that the book makes frequent reference elsewhere to scarce medical resources. It therefore seems justifiable to regard the rationing of healthcare as a form of tragic choice, and it is certainly the case that works in this field make liberal use both of Calabresi and Bobbit's terminology and of their analysis.

Calabresi and Bobbit are concerned with those scarce goods whose distribution ‘entails great suffering or death’. It has been argued that their scope of enquiry may best be defined as ‘life and death cases’, but as this statement makes apparent, it is more accurate to view the authors' focus as being upon those choices where no outcome is without significant human cost in terms of suffering, albeit that life itself may not necessarily be at stake. What is key, however, is not the subject-matter of the choice (thus, in addition to examples drawn from healthcare, Calabresi and Bobbit discuss, inter alia, conscription and the right to have children), but rather the fact that the choice in question gives rise to irreconcilable conflicts of values.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care
A Contextual and Comparative Perspective
, pp. 75 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×