Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T16:29:31.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - From the code civil du bas Canada (1866) to the code civil Quebecois (1991), or from the consolidation to the reform of the law: a reflection for Catalonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Esther Arroyo i Amayuelas
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Law Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Hector L. MacQueen
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Antoni Vaquer
Affiliation:
Universitat de Lleida
Santiago Espiau Espiau
Affiliation:
Universitat de Lleida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The following pages explain why private law was codified in the territory which we know today as Quebec, and how and why the task of recodification was approached over one hundred years later. Quebec's experience is interesting because, on the one hand, it was successful and it is contemporary, and, on the other hand, because the political and social situation of Quebec is similar to that of Catalonia, and therefore it can serve us as a model of comparative law. Both nations have acknowledged competence in civil law matters, but neither of them has full competence (artt. 92.12 and 13 of the British North American Act, and art. 149.1.8 of the Spanish constitution (CE)).

An analysis should allow one to discuss the feasibility of the codification technique, which Catalonia has also chosen recently, and debate how a modern codification should be approached. Basically, should the law that we now have and know be consolidated? Or should we break with the previous law? But before answering these questions, it may perhaps be convenient to ask ourselves about the suitability of civil codes as instruments for modernising law.

In Quebec, codification was successfully handled on two separate occasions, the last in 1994. The code symbolises a different culture and society in North America, dominated for the most part by Common Law which, historically, has tended to phagocytise the droit civil.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×