Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:06:54.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Competition, regulation, and intellectual property management in genetically modified foods: evidence from survey data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Pierre Regibeau
Affiliation:
University of Essex and Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom
Katharine Rockett
Affiliation:
University of Essex and Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, United Kingdom
Mariana Mazzucato
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
Giovanni Dosi
Affiliation:
Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Genetically modified food represents a unique opportunity to trace a new technology from its inception. It thereby provides a rich example within which we can examine the management of a new technology, as well as public policy towards new technologies. This chapter presents a series of hypotheses regarding industry structure, regulation, and patent policy towards GM food crops. We have designed and implemented a survey focusing on the innovations that contribute towards the production of new GM plant varieties to allow us to gather information on the plausibility of these hypotheses. This study summarizes the support (or lack of support) we found for them in our responses.

While our sample size is small, a number of suggestive findings emerge. First, we investigate the competitive structure of GM food. The industry involves a long vertical chain, moving from innovations to approved crops, to cultivation, processing, distribution, and – finally – retail. We investigate the structure of the first two stages of this chain. We find some support for our hypothesis that GM food is perceived, at these stages, as a separate industry from the traditional food sector. This suggests that the relatively high concentration ratios measured for GM food are reflective of the true concentration level of this industry. Further, they are well over the levels that generally trigger antitrust scrutiny.

Type
Chapter
Information
Knowledge Accumulation and Industry Evolution
The Case of Pharma-Biotech
, pp. 346 - 377
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bessen, J., and Maskin, E. (2000), Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation, Working Paper no. 00–01 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Casale, C. (2004), Monsanto: Momentum in the Field, available at http//:www.Monsanto.com/Monsanto/content/investor/financial/presentations/2004/monmouth2.pdf [accessed 12 January 2005].
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. (2000), Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not), Working Paper no. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Competition Commission (2003), Merger References: Competition Commission Guidelines, Her Majesty's Stationery office, London.
Conti, M., Regibeau, P., and Rockett, K. (2003), How Basic is Patented University Research? The Case of GM Crops, Discussion Paper no. 558, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and McBride, W. (2002), Adoption of Bioengineered Crops, Agricultural Economic Report no. AER810, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2005), “Market value and patent citations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 16–38.Google Scholar
Hall, B., and Ziedonis, R. (2001), “The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry 1979–1995,” RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 101–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harhoff, D., Regibeau, P., and Rockett, K. (2001), “Some simple economics of GM food,” Economic Policy, 33, 265–99.Google Scholar
Hayenga, M. (2003), “Structural change in the biotech seed and chemical industrial complex,” AgBioForum: The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics, 1 (2), 43–55.Google Scholar
Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (1998), “Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanjouw, J., and Schankerman, M. (2001), “Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition,” RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanjouw, J., and Schankerman, M.(2004), “Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators,” Economic Journal, 114, 441–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J. (1995), “Patenting in the shadow of competitors,” Journal of Law and Economics, 38 (2), 463–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1987), “Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, E. (1986), “Patents and innovation: an empirical study,” Management Science, 32, 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matutes, C., Regibeau, P., and Rockett, K. (1996), “Optimal patent design and the diffusion of innovations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 27 (1), 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, K. (2004), Seed Tech Titans, available at http://apply-mag.com/mag/farming_seed_tech_titans_2/ [accessed 12 January 2005].
Regibeau, P., and Rockett, K. (2004), Are More Important Patents Approved More Slowly and Should They Be?, Mimeo, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
Regibeau, P., and Rockett, K.(2005), Competition, Regulation, and Intellectual Property Management in Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence from Survey Data, Discussion Paper no. 591, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
Sakakibara, M., and Branstetter, L. (2001), “Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms,” RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. (2004), Innovation and Incentives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S., and Green, J. (1990), “Novelty and disclosure in patent law,” RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (1), 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trajtenberg, M. (1990), “A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations,” RAND Journal of Economics, 20 (1), 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., and Jaffe, A. (1997), “University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziedonis, R. (2000), Patent Protection and Firm Strategy in the Semiconductor Industry, Ph.D. dissertation, Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×