Editorial introduction

The three case studies that follow all exhibit the subtle links between economies and democracies in transition and protecting beyond the protected. The first case is Estonia, a Baltic state of immense biological richness, but in the zone of economic renaissance. It is possible for that economic pathway to favour biodiversity, so long as governance and democracies swing in tandem. Similarly Croatia is an emerging, post-war democracy with enormous cultural vibrancy and ecological-geological diversity. Harmonising this vibrancy and diversity through the opportunities afforded by a new European integration could create genuine double resilience. Indonesia is also a young nation in terms of democracy, with a legacy of brutal domination of minority cultures and endemic corruption. How far it can shake off this legacy in the name of protecting even the protected remains an open question.

Citizen involvement in biosphere reserve management in Estonia

Martin Welp

Introduction

Estonia is located on the coast of the Baltic Sea. Formerly part of the Soviet Union, Estonia re-established its independence in 1991. It is a young democracy, striving to become a member state in the European Union. With strong economic growth and a determination to base its legislation on EU standards, it is becoming a primary candidate for membership during this decade.

Estonia enjoys enormous biological diversity. If implemented successfully, the Estonian Natura 2000 sites will considerably enrich the Europe-wide network.