Abbott, Edwin A.Johannine Grammar. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1906.Google Scholar

Aberle, David. “A Note on Relative Deprivation Theory as Applied to Millenarian and Other Cult Movements,” in Millennial Dreams in Action: Studies in Revolutionary Religious Movements. Edited by Thrupp, Sylvia L. Comparative Studies in Society and History: Supplements Series 2. The Hague: Mouton, 1962, pp. 209–14.Google Scholar

Achtemeier, Paul. “Towards the Isolation of Pre-Markan Miracle Catenae.” Journal of Biblical Literature 89 (1970), pp. 265–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Edward. Constructing the World: A Study in Paul's Cosmological Language. SNTW. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 2000.Google Scholar

Aitken, Ellen B. “At the Well of Living Water: Jacob Traditions in John 4,” in The Interpretation of Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity. Edited by Evans, Craig A. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha: Supplement Series 33. Studies in Scripture and Early Judaism and Christianity 7. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000, pp. 342–62.Google Scholar

Aland, Kurt. Synopsis Quattuor Euangeliorum: Locis parallelis evangeliorum apocryphorum et patrum adhibitis. 13th edn. Stuttgart: Württembergische Bibelanstalt, 1985.Google Scholar

Alexander, Loveday. “Luke's Preface in the Context of Greek Preface-Writing.” Novum Testamentum 28 (1986), pp. 48–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Loveday. “Fact, Fiction, and the Genre of Acts.” NTS 44 (1988), pp. 380–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Loveday, “Ancient Book Production and the Circulation of the Gospels,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, pp. 71–111.Google Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. “Midrash and the Gospels,” in Synoptic Studies: The Ampleforth Conferences of 1982 and 1983. Edited by Tuckett, C. M.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 7. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1983, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. “Rabbinic Biography and the Biography of Jesus: A Survey of the Evidence,” in Synoptic Studies: The Ampleforth Conferences of 1982 and 1983. Edited by Tuckett, C. M.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 7. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1983, pp. 19–50.Google Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. “Rabbinic Judaism and the New Testament.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 74 (1983), pp. 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. “‘The Parting of the Ways’ from the Perspective of Rabbinic Judaism,” in Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways A.D. 70 to 135. Edited by Dunn, James D. G.. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 66. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1992, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C. Jr. “Was there a ‘Lukan Community?’” Irish Biblical Studies 10 (1988), pp. 62–70.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C. Jr.The New Moses: A Matthean Typology. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1993.Google Scholar

Alon, Gedaliah. The Jews in Their Land in the Talmudic Age (70–640 C.E.). Translated and edited by Levi, Gershon. 2 vols. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, the Hebrew University, 1980–84.Google Scholar

Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar

Alter, Robert. “How Conventions Help Us Read: The Case of the Bible's Annunciation Type-Scene.” Proof 3 (1983), pp. 115–30.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. edn. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar

Anderson, Hugh. Jesus and Christian Origins. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Anderson, Paul N. “John and Mark: The Bi-Optic Gospels,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 175–88.Google Scholar

Anthony, Dick and Robbins, Thomas. “From Symbolic Realism to Structuralism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 14 (1975), pp. 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antoni, Carlo. From History to Sociology: The Transition in German Historical Thinking. Translated by Hayden V. White. London: Merlin Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Applebaum, Shim'on. “The Organization of the Jewish Communities of the Diaspora,” in The Jewish People in the First Century. Edited by Safrai, Samuel and Stern, Menahem. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974, vol. Ⅰ, pp. 464–503.Google Scholar

Applebaum, Shim'on. “The Social and Economic Status of the Jews in the Diaspora,” in The Jewish People in the First Century. Edited by Safrai, Samuel and Stern, Menahem. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 701–27.Google Scholar

Arend, Walter. Die typischen Szenen bei Homer. Berlin: Weidmann, 1933.Google Scholar

Ascough, Richard S. “Matthew and Community Formation,” in The Gospel of Matthew in Current Study. Edited by Aune, David E. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001, pp. 96–126.Google Scholar

Ashton, John, ed. The Interpretation of John. London: SPCK, 1986.Google Scholar

Ashton, John, Understanding the Fourth Gospel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ashton, John, “Riddles and Mysteries: The Way, the Truth, and the Life,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 333–42.Google Scholar

Attridge, Harold W. “Genre Bending in the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Biblical Literature 121 (2002), pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aune, David Edward. The Cultic Setting of Realized Eschatology in Early Christianity. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 28. Leiden: Brill, 1972.Google Scholar

Aune, David Edward. “The Problem of the Genre of the Gospels: A Critique of C. H. Talbert's What is a Gospel?” in Gospel Perspectives: Studies of History and Tradition in the Four Gospels. Edited by France, R. T. and Wenham, David. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1981, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 9–60.Google Scholar

Aune, David Edward. Review of Wayne A. Meeks, The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. Interpretation 39 (1985), pp. 80–82.Google Scholar

Aune, David Edward. The New Testament in its Literary Environment. Library of Early Christianity 8. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987.Google Scholar

Aune, David Edward. “Greco-Roman Biography,” in Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament: Selected Forms and Genres. Edited by Aune, David E. Society of Biblical Literature Sources for Biblical Study 21. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988, pp. 107–26.Google Scholar

Baasland, Ernst. “Urkristendommen Ⅰ sosiologiens lys.” Tidskrift for Teologi og Kirke 54 (1984), pp. 45–57.Google Scholar

Bacon, B. W.Is Mark a Roman Gospel? Harvard Theological Studies 7. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1919.Google Scholar

Baird, J. A. “Genre Analysis as a Method of Historical Criticism,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1972, pp. 385–411.Google Scholar

Baker, Derek, ed. The Church in Town and Countryside. SCH 16. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar

Baker, Dom Aelred. “Form and the Gospels.” Downside Review 88 (1970), pp. 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balch, David L., ed. Social History of the Matthean Community: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar

Baltzer, Klaus. Die Biographie der Propheten. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar

Banks, Robert. Paul's Idea of Community: The Early House Churches in their Historical Setting. Exeter: Paternoster, 1980.Google Scholar

Banton, Michael, ed. Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. Association of Social Anthropologists Monographs 3. London: Tavistock, 1966.Google Scholar

Bar-Efrat, Shimon. The Art of Narration in the Bible. Tel Aviv: Sifriat Hapoalim, 1979.Google Scholar

Bar-Efrat, Shimon. Narrative Art in the Bible. Translated by Dorothea Shefer-Vanson. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament: Supplement Series 70. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Barclay, John M. G. “Mirror-Reading a Polemical Letter: Galatians as a Test Case.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 31 (1987), pp. 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barclay, John M. G. “Deviance and Apostasy: Some Applications of Deviance Theory to First-Century Judaism and Christianity,” in Modeling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament in its Context. Edited by Esler, Philip F. London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 114–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barclay, John M. G.Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora from Alexander to Trajan (323 BCE – 117 CE). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1996.Google Scholar

Barclay, John M. G. “The Family as Bearer of Religion in Judaism and Early Christianity,” in Constructing Early Christian Families. Edited by Moxnes, Halvor. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barr, David L. “Towards a Definition of the Gospel Genre: A Generic Analysis and Comparison of the Synoptic Gospels and the Socratic Dialogues by Means of Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy.” Ph.D. diss., Florida State University, 1974.Google Scholar

Barr, James. Holy Scripture: Canon, Authority, Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Barrett, Charles Kingsley. “The Old Testament in the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Theological Studies 48 (1947), pp. 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, Charles Kingsley. The Gospel of John and Judaism. Translated by D. M. Smith. London: SPCK, 1975.Google Scholar

Barrett, Charles Kingsley. The Gospel According to St. John. 2nd edn. London: SPCK, 1978.Google Scholar

Barrett, Charles Kingsley. “Johannine Christianity,” in Christian Beginnings: Word and Community from Jesus to Post-Apostolic Times. Edited by Jürgen Becker, . Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1993, pp. 330–58.Google Scholar

Barrett, Charles Kingsley. “John and Judaism,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001, pp. 231–46.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. S/Z. Translated by Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang, 1974.Google Scholar

Barton, John. Holy Writings, Sacred Text: The Canon in Early Christianity. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1997.Google Scholar

Barton, Stephen C. “The Communal Dimensions of Earliest Christianity.” Journal of Theological Studies 43 (1992), pp. 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, Stephen C. “Early Christianity and the Sociology of the Sect,” in The Open Text: New Directions for Biblical Studies? Edited by Watson, Francis. London: SCM Press, 1993, pp. 140–62.Google Scholar

Barton, Stephen C. “Living as Families in the Light of the New Testament.” Interpretation 52 (1998), pp. 130–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, Stephen C. “Can We Identify the Gospel Audiences?” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, pp. 173–94.Google Scholar

Barton, Stephen C. “Christian Community in the Light of the Gospel of John,” in Christology, Controversy, and Community: New Testament Essays in Honour of David R. Catchpole. Edited by Horrell, David G and Tuckett, Christopher M. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 99. Leiden: Brill, 2000, pp. 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassler, Jouette M. “The Galileans: A Neglected Factor in Johannine Community Research.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 43 (1981), pp. 243–57.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J.Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1990.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “The Parting of the Ways: What Happened and Why?” Studia Theologica 47 (1993), pp. 135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “Papias and Polycrates on the Origin of the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Theological Studies 44 (1993), pp. 24–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “The Beloved Disciple as Ideal Author,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 49 (1993), pp. 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “The Apocalypse of Peter: A Jewish Christian Apocalypse from the Time of the Bar Kokhba.” Apocrypha 5 (1994), pp. 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “Nicodemus and the Gurion Family.” Journal of Theological Studies 47 (1996), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “Introduction,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “For Whom Were the Gospels Written?,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, pp. 9–48.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “John for Readers of Mark,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, pp. 147–71.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “Response to Philip Esler.” Scottish Journal of Theology 51 (1998), pp. 248–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “The Audience of the Fourth Gospel,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 101–11.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J.Gospel Women: Studies of the Named Women in the Gospels. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 2002.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J. “The Eyewitnesses and the Gospel Traditions.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 1 (2003), pp. 28–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauckham, Richard J., ed. The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Baumbach, Günther. “Die Anfänge der Kirchwerdung im Urchristentum.” Kairos 24 (1982), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar

Baumgarten-Crusius, Ludwig. Theologische Auslegung der johanneischen Schriften. Thüringen: Jena, 1843–45, vols. Ⅰ–Ⅱ.Google Scholar

Baxter, Tony. Review of Richard Bauckham, ed., The Gospels for All Christians. Evangel 19 (2001), p. 55.Google Scholar

Beardslee, William A.Literary Criticism of the New Testament. Guides to Biblical Scholarship. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1970.Google Scholar

Beasley-Murray, George R.John. 2nd edn. Word Biblical Commentary 36. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1999.Google Scholar

Beaton, Richard. Review of David C. Sim, The Gospel of Matthew and Christian Judaism: The History and Social Setting of the Matthean Community. Journal of Theological Studies 51 (2000), pp. 242–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beavis, May Ann. Mark's Audience: The Literary and Social Setting of Mark: 4.11–12. Journal for the Study of the New TestamentSup 33. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Beck, David R. “The Narrative Function of Anonymity in Fourth Gospel Characterization.” Semeia 63 (1993), pp. 143–58.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S.Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S., ed. The Other Side: Perspectives on Deviance. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Beckford, James A. “Religious Organization.” Current Sociology 21 (1973), pp. 1–170.Google Scholar

Bellah, Robert N. “Christianity and Symbolic Realism,” in Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditional World. Edited by Bellah, Robert. New York: Harper & Row, 1970, pp. 236–59.Google Scholar

Bellah, Robert N. “Comment on ‘The Limits of Symbolic Realism.’” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 13 (1974), pp. 487–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, J. Kenneth and Dorsett, James H. “Toward a Theory of Religious Organizations.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 10 (1971), pp. 138–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Klaus. Exegese des Neuen Testaments: neue Wege vom Text zur Auslegung. Uni-Taschenbücher 658. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer, 1977.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. “The Sociological Study of Sectarianism.” Social Research 21 (1954), pp. 467–85.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L.The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City: Doubleday, 1967.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar

Best, Ernest. Following Jesus: Discipleship in the Gospel of Mark. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 4. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Best, Ernest. Mark: The Gospel as Story. Studies of the New Testament and Its World. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1983.Google Scholar

Best, Thomas. “Sociological Study of the New Testament: Promise and Peril of A New Discipline.” Scottish Journal of Theology 36 (1983), pp. 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betz, Otto. “The Concept of the So-Called ‘Divine Man’ in Mark's Christology,” in Studies in New Testament and Early Christian Literature: Essays in Honor of Allen P. Wikgren. Edited by Aune, David E. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 33. Leiden: Brill, 1972, pp. 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beutler, Johannes. Die Johannesbriefe: Übersetz und erklärt. 3rd edn. Regensburger Neues Testament. Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 2000.Google Scholar

Beutler, Johannes. “Faith and Confession: The Purpose of John,” in Word, Theology, and Community in John. Edited by Painter, J., Culpepper, R. A., and Segovia, F. F.. Festschrift for Robert Kysar. St. Louis: Chalice Press, 2002, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar

Bieder, Werner. Gottes Sendung und der missionarische Auftrag der Kirche nach Matthäus, Lukas, Paulus und Johannes. Theologische Studien 82. Zurich: EVZ-Verlag, 1965.Google Scholar

Bieringer, Reimund, Didier Pollefeyt, and Frederique Vandecasteele-Vanneuville. “Wrestling with Johannine Anti-Judaism: A Hermeneutical Framework for the Analysis of the Current Debate,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar

Bilezikian, Gilbert G.The Liberated Gospel: A Comparison of the Gospel of Mark and Greek Tragedy. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1977.Google Scholar

Blank, Josef. Krisis: Untersuchungen zur johanneischen Christologie und Eschatologie. Freiburg: Lambertus, 1964.Google Scholar

Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “Interpretation and Tendency to Sectarianism: An Aspect of Second Temple Judaism,” in Jewish and Christian Self-Definition: Aspects of Judaism in the Graeco-Roman Period. Edited by Sanders, E. P. with Baumgarten, A. I. and Mendelson, A.. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Bloch, Marc. The Historian's Craft. Translated by Peter Putnam. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Craig. L. “Form Criticism,” in Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. Edited by Green, Joel B, McKnight, Scot, and Marshall, I. Howard. Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity, 1992.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Craig L.Review of Richard Bauckham, ed., The Gospels for All Christians. Themelios 25 (2000), pp. 78–80.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Craig L.The Historical Reliability of John's Gospel: Issues and Commentary. Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity, 2001.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Craig. L. “The Historical Reliability of John: Rushing in Where Angels Fear to Tread?,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Craig L. “Interpreting Old Testament Prophetic Literature in Matthew: Double Fulfillment.” Trinity Journal 23 (2002), pp. 17–33.Google Scholar

Böcher, Otto. “Johanneisches in der Apokalypse des Johannes.” NTS 27 (1981), pp. 310–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boer, Martinus C. de. “John 4:27 — Women (and Men) in the Gospel and Community of John,” in Women in the Biblical Tradition. Edited by Brooks, George J. New York: Edwin Mellen, 1992, pp. 208–30.Google Scholar

Boer, Martinus C. de. “The Depiction of ‘the Jews’ in John's Gospel: Matters of Behavior and Identity,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 141–57.Google Scholar

Bogart, John. Orthodox and Heretical Perfectionism in the Johannine Community as Evident in the First Epistle of John. Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 33. Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Boismard, Marie-Émile. Moses or Jesus: An Essay in Johannine Christology. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 84-A. Translated by B. T. Viviano. Leuven: University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Boismard, Marie-Emile and Lamouille, Arnaud. L'Evangile de Jean: Synopse des quatre évangiles. Paris: du Cerf, 1977, vol. Ⅲ.Google Scholar

Boon, James A.Other Tribes, Other Scribes: Symbolic Anthropology in the Comparative Study of Cultures, Histories, Religions, and Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Booth, Wayne. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgen, Peder. Bread from Heaven: An Exegetical Study of the Concept of Manna in the Gospel of John and the Writings of Philo. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 10. Leiden: Brill, 1965.

Borgen, Peder. Philo, John and Paul: New Perspectives on Judaism and Early Christianity. Brown Judaic Studies 131. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Borgen, Peder. Philo of Alexandria: An Exegete for His Time. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 86. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Bornhäuser, Karl. Das Johannesevangelium: Eine Missionsschrift für Israel. Beiträge zur Förderung christlicher Theologie 2/15. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1928.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther, Barth, Gerhard, and Held, Heinz Joachim. Tradition and Interpretation in Matthew. Translated by Percy Scott. London: SCM Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Botha, J. Eugene. Jesus and the Samaritan Woman: A Speech Act Reading of John 4:1–42. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 65. Leiden: Brill, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottomore, Tom and Nisbet, Robert, eds. A History of Sociological Analysis. London: Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited by Thompson, John B. Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Bowe, Barbara E.Review of Richard Bauckham, ed., The Gospels for All Christians. Concordia Theological Monthly 27 (2000), p. 295.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W.Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Sather Classical Lectures 1991. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bowman, John W. “Samaritan Studies 1: The Fourth Gospel and the Samaritans,” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 40 (1957–58), pp. 298–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, John W.The Gospel of Mark: The New Christian Jewish Passover Haggadah. Studia Post-Biblica 8. Leiden: Brill, 1965.Google Scholar

Box, G. H. “The Jewish Environment of Early Christianity.” The Expositor 12 (1916), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Brawley, Robert L. “An Absent Complement and Intertextuality in John 19:28–29.” Journal of Biblical Literature 112 (1993), pp. 427–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenk, Frederick E. Review of Richard Burridge, What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. Gnomon 66 (1994), pp. 492–96.Google Scholar

Bretschneider, Karl G.Probabilia de evangelii et epistolarum Joannis Apostoli, indole et origine. Leipzig: University Press, 1820.Google Scholar

Brodie, Thomas L.The Quest for the Origin of John's Gospel: A Source-Oriented Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Brodie, Thomas L.The Gospel According to John: A Literary and Theological Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Brodie, Thomas L.The Crucial Bridge: The Elijah-Elisha Narrative as an Interpretive Synthesis of Genesis-Kings and A Literary Model for the Gospels. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible 29. Garden City: Doubleday, 1966, vol. Ⅰ.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “The Kerygma of the Gospel According to John: The Johannine View of Jesus in Modern Studies.” Interpretation 21 (1967), pp. 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The Gospel According to John. The Anchor Bible 29a. Garden City: Doubleday, 1970, vol. Ⅱ.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “Jesus and Elisha.” Perspective 12 (1971), pp. 85–104.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “Johannine Ecclesiology — The Community's Origins.” Interpretation 31 (1977), pp. 379–93.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “‘Other Sheep Not of This Fold’: The Johannine Perspective on Christian Diversity in the Late First Century.” Journal of Biblical Literature 97 (1978), pp. 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The Community of the Beloved Disciple: The Life, Loves, and Hates of an Individual Church in New Testament Times. New York: Paulist Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “New Testament Background for the Concept of Local Church.” Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America 36 (1981), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The Epistles of John. nThe Anchor Bible 30. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1982.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.The Churches the Apostles Left Behind. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1984.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E.An Introduction to the Gospel of John. The Anchor Bible Reference Library. Edited by Moloney, Francis J. New York: Doubleday, 2003.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F.Men and Movements in the Primitive Church: Studies in Non-Pauline Christianity. Exeter: Paternoster, 1979.Google Scholar

Bryant, J. M. “The Sect-church Dynamic and Christian Expansion in the Roman Empire: Persecution, Penitential Discipline, and Schism in Sociological Perspective.” British Journal of Sociology 44 (1993), pp. 303–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, George Wesley. “The Samaritan Origin of the Gospel of John,” in Religions in Antiquity: Essays in Memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough. Edited by Neusner, Jacob. Studies in the History of Religion 14. Leiden: Brill, 1968, pp. 149–75.Google Scholar

Buchanan, George Wesley. Introduction to Intertextuality. Lewiston: Mellen Biblical Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bühner, Jan Adolph. Der Gesandte und sein Weg im vierten Evangelium: Die Kultur- und religionsgeschichtlichen Grundlagen der johanneischen Sendungschristologie sowie ihre traditionsgeschichtliche Entwicklung. WUNT 2/2. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1977.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. “Die Bedeutung der neuerschlossenen mandäischen und manichäischen Quellen für das Verständnis des Johannesevangeliums.” ZNW 24 (1925), pp. 100–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. London: SCM Press, 1952, vol. Ⅰ.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. Translated by Kendrick Grobel. London: SCM Press, 1955, vol. Ⅱ.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Primitive Christianity in its Contemporary Setting. Translated by Reginald H. Fuller. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1956.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. The History of the Synoptic Tradition. Translated by John Marsh. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Translated by G. R. Beasley-Murray. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1971.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. The Johannine Epistles: A Commentary on the Johannine Epistles. Translated by R. Philip O'Hara, Lane C. McGaughy, and Robert W. Funk. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1973.Google Scholar

Burge, Gary M.The Anointed Community: The Holy Spirit in the Johannine Tradition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.Google Scholar

Burge, Gary M. “Situating John's Gospel in History,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. History and Social Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Burnett, Fred W. “Characterization and Reader Construction of Characters in the Gospels.” Semeia 63 (1993), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar

Burridge, Kenelm. New Heaven, New Earth: A Study of Millenarian Activities. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A. “Gospel,” in A Dictionary of Biblical Interpretation. Edited by Coggin, Richard J and Houlden, James L. London: SCM Press, 1990, pp. 266–68.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A.What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A. “About People, by People, for People: Gospel Genre and Audiences,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998, pp. 113–45.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard A. “Gospel Genre, Christological Controversy and the Absence of Rabbinic Biography: Some Implications of the Biographical Hypothesis,” in Christology, Controversy, and Community: New Testament Essays in Honour of David R. Catchpole. Edited by Horrell, David G and Tuckett, Christopher M. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 99. Leiden: Brill, 2000, pp. 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burridge, Richard A.What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. 2nd edn. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

Busch, E. W. “Tragic Action in the Second Gospel.” Journal of Religion 11 (1931), pp. 346–58.Google Scholar

Busse, Ulrich. “Die Tempelmetaphorik als ein Beispel von implizitem Rekurs auf die biblische Tradition im Johannesevangelium,” in The Scriptures in the Gospels. Edited by Tuckett, Christopher M. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 131. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1997, pp. 395–428.Google Scholar

Byrskog, Samuel. Story as History-History as Story: The Gospel Traditions in the Context of Ancient Oral History. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 123. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar

Caird, G. B. New Testament Theology. Edited and completed by Hurst, L. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Cairns, David. “The Thought of Peter Berger.” Scottish Journal of Theology 27 (1974), pp. 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Averil. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse. Sather Classical Lectures 55. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Campenhausen, Hans. The Formation of the Christian Bible. Translated by John Austin Baker. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1974.Google Scholar

Carlson, Stephen C. “Clement of Alexandria on the ‘Order’ of the Gospels.” NTS 47 (2001), pp. 118–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, T. F.The Shape of the Past: Models and Antiquity. Lawrence, Kans.: Coronado Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Carrington, Philip. The Primitive Christian Calendar: A Study in the Making of the Markan Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Carroll, Kenneth L. “The Fourth Gospel and the Exclusion of Christians from the Synagogues.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 40 (1957), pp. 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Donald A. “Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel: After Dodd, What?,” in Gospel Perspectives: Studies of History and Tradition in the Four Gospels. Edited by France, R. T. and Wenham, David. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1981, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 83–145.Google Scholar

Carson, Donald A. “Understanding Misunderstanding in the Fourth Gospel” Tyndale Bulletin 33 (1982), pp. 59–91.Google Scholar

Carson, Donald A. “The Purpose of the Fourth Gospel: John 20:31 Reconsidered.” Journal of Biblical Literature 106 (1987), pp. 639–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Donald A. “John and the Johannine Epistles,” in It is Written: Scripture Citing Scripture: Essays in Honor of Barnabas Lindars. Edited by Carson, D. A. and Willaimson, H. G. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Donald A.The Gospel According to John. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Carson, Donald A. “Redaction Criticism: On the Legitimacy and Illegitimacy of a Literary Tool,” in Scripture and Truth. Rev. and enl. edn. Edited by Carson, D. A. and Woodbridge, John D. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1992, pp. 115–42.Google Scholar

Carson, Donald A. “Syntactical and Text-Critical Observations on John 20:30–31: One More Round on the Purpose of the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Biblical Literature 124 (2005), pp. 693–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, Warren. “Community Definition and Matthew's Gospel,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1997, pp. 637–63.Google Scholar

Casson, L.Travel in the Ancient World. London: Allen & Unwin, 1974.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, James H.The Beloved Disciple: Whose Witness Validates the Gospel of John?Valley Forge, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1995.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, James H. “The Gospel of John: Exclusivism Caused by a Social Setting Different from That of Jesus (John 11:54 and 14:6),” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 247–78.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, M. P.Trade Routes and Commerce in the Roman Empire. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1926.Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S. “The Sensus Literalis of Scripture: An Ancient and Modern Problem,” in Beiträge zur Alttestamentlichen Theologie: Festschrift für Walther Zimmerli zum 70. Geburtstag. Edited by Donner, Herbert, Hanhart, Robert, and Smend, Rudolf. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1977, pp. 80–93.Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S. “The Canonical Shape of the Prophetic Literature.” Interpretation 32 (1978), pp. 46–55.Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S.The New Testament as Canon: An Introduction. London: SCM Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S.Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1992.Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard S. “Retrospective Reading of the Old Testament Prophets.” Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 108 (1996), pp. 362–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, Jay and Rothstein, Eric, eds. Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Coenen, L. “ἐκκλησία,” in New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology. Edited by Brown, Colin. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1975–86, vol. Ⅰ, pp. 291–307.Google Scholar

Cohen, Anthony P.The Symbolic Construction of Community. KI 1. London: Routledge, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, S. J. D., ed. The Jewish Family in Antiquity. Brown Judaic Studies 289. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. “Narrative, History, and Gospel.” Semeia 43 (1988), pp. 145–53.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Review of Richard Burridge, What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. Journal of Religion 75 (1995), pp. 239–46.Google Scholar

Collins, John J.The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to the Jewish Matrix of Christianity. New York: Crossroad, 1984.Google Scholar

Collins, Raymond F. “The Representative Figures of the Fourth Gospel — Ⅰ.” Downside Review 94 (1976), pp. 26–46,CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Raymond F. “The Representative Figures of the Fourth Gospel — Ⅱ.” Downside Review 94 (1976), pp. 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Raymond F. “Speaking of the Jews: ‘Jews’ in the Discourse Material of the Fourth Gospel,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 158–75.Google Scholar

Colpe, Carsten. “The Oldest Jewish-Christian Community,” in Christian Beginnings: Word and Community from Jesus to Post-Apostolic Times. Edited by Jürgen Becker, . Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1993, pp. 75–102.Google Scholar

Conway, Colleen M. “The Production of the Johannine Community: A New Historicist Perspective.” Journal of Biblical Literature 121 (2002), pp. 479–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, Colleen M. “Speaking through Ambiguity: Minor Characters in the Fourth Gospel.” Biblical Interpretation 10 (2002), pp. 324–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. The Theology of St. Luke. Translated by Geoffrey Buswell. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. “Luke's Place in the Development of Early Christianity,” in Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert. Edited by Keck, Leander and Martyn, J. Louis. Nashville: Abingdon, 1966, pp. 298–316.Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Creed, J. M.The Gospel According to St. Luke. London: Macmillan, 1930.Google Scholar

Crosman, Robert. “Do Readers Make Meaning?,” in The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Edited by Suleiman, Susan R and Crosman, Inge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980, pp. 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossan, John Dominic. The Historical Jesus: The Life of A Mediterranean Peasant. New York: Harper Collins, 1992.Google Scholar

Crossan, John Dominic. The Birth of Christianity: Discovering What Happened in the Years immediately after the Execution of Jesus. San Francisco: Harper & Collins, 1998.Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Reading,” in The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Edited by Suleiman, Susan R and Crosman, Inge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980, pp. 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. “Les récentes études sur la formation de la tradition évangélique.” Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses 5 (1925), pp. 564–79.Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. Early Christian Worship. Translated by A. Stewart Todd and James B. Torrance. Studies in Biblical Theology 10. London: SCM Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. “The Plurality of the Gospels as a Theological Problem in Antiquity: A Study in the History of Dogma,” in The Early Church: Oscar Cullmann. Edited by Higgins, A. J. B.. Translated by A. J. B. Higgins and S. Godman. London: SCM Press, 1956, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. The Johannine Circle: Its Place in Judaism, Among the Disciples of Jesus and in Early Christianity: A Study in the Origin of the Gospel of John. Translated by John Bowden. London: SCM Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. The Johannine School: An Evaluation of the Johannine-School Hypothesis Based on an Investigation of the Nature of Ancient Schools. Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 26. Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. “The Narrator in the Fourth Gospel: Intratextual Relationships,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1982, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Foundations and Facets: New Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983.Google Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. “The Theology of the Gospel of John,” RE 85 (1988), pp. 417–32.Google Scholar

Culpepper, R. Alan. “Anti-Judaism in the Fourth Gospel as a Theological Problem for Christian Interpreters,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar

Cweikowski, Frederick J.The Beginnings of the Church. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar

Dahl, Nils Alstrup. “The Plurality of the Pauline Epistles as a Problem in the Ancient Church,” in Neotestamentica et patristica, eine Freundesgabe, Oscar Cullmann zu seinem 60 Geburtstag. Edited by Wilder, A. N.et al. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 6. Leiden: Brill, 1962, pp. 161–71.Google Scholar

Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Jesus in the Memory of the Early Church. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1976.Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. The Narrative Covenant: Transformations of Genre in the Growth of Biblical Literature. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. “Christianity as a Jewish Sect,” in The Crucible of Christianity: Judaism, Hellenism and the Historical Background of the Christian Faith. Edited by Toynbee, Arnold. London: Thames & Hudson, 1969, pp. 275–82.Google Scholar

Davies, Margaret. Rhetoric and Reference in the Fourth Gospel. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 69. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Davies, William D.The Gospel and the Land: Early Christianity and Jewish Territorial Doctrine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Davies, William D. and Allison, Dale C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. The International Critical Commentary. 3 vols. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1988–97.Google Scholar

Dawson, David. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar

DeConick, April D. “John Rivals Thomas: From Community Conflict to Gospel Narrative,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 303–11.Google Scholar

Deeley, Mary Katharine. “Ezekiel's Shepherd and John's Jesus: A Case Study in the Appropriation of Biblical Texts,” in Studies in Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity: Investigations and Proposals. Edited by Evans, Craig A and Sanders, James A. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 148. Studies in Scripture and Early Judaism and Christianity 5. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997, pp. 252–64.Google Scholar

Deissmann, Adolf. Light from the Ancient Near East: The New Testament Illustrated from Recently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World. 2nd edn. Translated by Lionel R. M. Strachan. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1910.Google Scholar

Demerath, Nicholas J. Ⅲ. “In a Sow's Ear: A Reply to Goode.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 6 (1967), pp. 77–84.Google Scholar

Demerath, Nicholas J. Ⅲ. “Son of a Sow's Ear.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 6 (1967), pp. 257–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Detweiler, Robert. “How to Read a Jaguar: A Response to Mary Gerhart.” Semeia 43 (1988), pp. 45–51.Google Scholar

Dettwiler, Andreas. Die Gegenwart des Erhöhten: Eine exegetische Studie Zu den johanneischen Abschiedsreden (Joh. 13,31–16,33) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres Relectere-Charakters. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 169. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, Arthur J. “The Eyewitness of History: Visionary Consciousness in the Fourth Gospel,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar

Dewey, Joanna. “The Gospel of John in Its Oral-Written Media World,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 239–52.Google Scholar

Dibelius, Martin. From Tradition to Gospel. Translated by Bertram Lee Woolf. London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson, 1934.Google Scholar

Dieffenbach, Ludwig A. “Über einege wahrscheinliche Interpolationen im Evangelium Johannis,” Kritisch. Journ. d. neuest. theol. Lit. 5 (1816), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Dihle, Albrecht. “The Gospels and Greek Biography,” in The Gospel and The Gospels. Edited by Stuhlmacher, Peter. Translated by John Bowden. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 361–86.Google Scholar

Dittes, James E. “Typing the Typologies: Some Parallels in the Career of Church-Sect and Extrinsic-Intrinsic.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 10 (1971), pp. 375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, Charles H. “The Framework of the Gospel Narrative.” Expository Times 43 (1931–32), pp. 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, Charles H.The Apostolic Preaching and its Developments: Three Lectures with an Appendix on Eschatology and History. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1936.Google Scholar

Dodd, Charles H.The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, Charles H.Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, Charles H.More New Testament Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Dods, Marcus. The Gospel of St. John. 10th edn. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1906.Google Scholar

Donahue, John R. “The Quest for the Community of Mark's Gospel,” in The Four Gospels 1992. Edited by Segbroeck, F.et al. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 100. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1992, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 817–38.Google Scholar

Donahue, John R., ed. Life in Abundance: Studies of John's Gospel in Tribute to Raymond E. Brown. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Doty, William G. “The Concept of Genre in Literary Analysis,” in The Genre of the Gospels: Studies in Methodology, Comparative Research and Compositional Analysis. Missoula: Society of Biblical Literature, 1972, pp. 29–64.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1996.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982.Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Downing, F. Gerald. The Church and Jesus: A Study in History, Philosophy, and Theology. Studies in Biblical Theology, Second Series 10. London: SCM Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Downing, F. Gerald. “Contemporary Analogies to the Gospel and Acts: ‘Genres’ or ‘Motifs’?,” in Synoptic Studies: The Ampleforth Conferences of 1982 and 1983. Edited by Tuckett, C. M.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 7. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1983, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar

Duff, David. “Intertextuality versus Genre Theory: Bakhtin, Kristeva and the Question of Genre.” Paragraph 25 (2002), pp. 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duff, Jeremy. Review of Richard Bauckham, ed., The Gospels for All Christians. Anvil 16 (1999), pp. 134–35.Google Scholar

Duke, Paul D.Irony in the Fourth Gospel. Atlanta; John Knox, 1985.Google Scholar

Dunderberg, Ismo. “The Beloved Disciple in John: Ideal Figure in an Early Christian Controversy,” in Fair Play: Diversity and Conflicts in Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Heikki Räisänen. Edited by Dunderberg, Ismo, Tuckett, Christopher, and Syreeni, Kari. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 103. Leiden: Brill, 2002, pp. 243–69.Google Scholar

Duling, Dennis C. “Millennialism,” in The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation. Edited by Rohrbaugh, Richard L. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1996, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: An Inquiry into the Character of Earliest Christianity. 2nd edn. London: SCM Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.The Parting of the Ways between Christianity and Judaism and their Significance for the Character of Christianity. London: SCM Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. “Let John be John: A Gospel for its Time,” in The Gospel and The Gospels. Edited by Stuhlmacher, Peter. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 293–322.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. “The Embarrassment of History: Reflections on the Problem of ‘Anti-Judaism’ in the Fourth Gospel,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 41–60.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G.Christianity in the Making: Volume 1: Jesus Remembered. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G., ed. Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways A.D. 70 to 135. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 66. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1993.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. The Rules of Sociological Method. Translated by Sarah A. Solovay and John H. Mueller. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Drummond, James. An Inquiry into the Character and Authorship of the Fourth Gospel. London: Williams and Norgate, 1903.Google Scholar

Dyson, S. “The Relevance for Roman Archeologists of Recent Approaches to Archeology in Greece.” Journal of Roman Archaeology 2 (1989), pp. 143–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckermann, Jacob C. R. “Uber die eigentlich sicheren Gründe des Glaubens an die Hauptthatsachen der Geschichte Jesu, und über die wahrscheinliche Entstehung der Evangelien und der Apostelgeschichte,” Theologische Beiträge 2 (1976), pp. 106–256.Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. London: Hutchinson, 1981.Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark J. “Biography and Biographic,” in Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Edited by Edwards, Mark J and Swain, Simon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997, pp. 227–34.Google Scholar

Eister, Alan W. “Toward a Radical Critique of Church-Sect Typologizing: Comment on ‘Some Critical Observations on the Church-Sect Dimension.’” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 6 (1967), pp. 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eister, Alan W. “H. Richard Neibuhr and the Paradox of Religious Organization: A Radical Critique,” in Beyond the Classics? Essays in the Scientific Study of Religion.. Edited by Clock, Charles Y and Hammond, Phillip E. New York: Harper & Row, 1973, pp. 355–408.Google Scholar

Ellingworth, Paul. Review of Richard Bauckham, ed., The Gospels for All Christians. Evangelical Quarterly 71 (1999), pp. 273–75.Google Scholar

Elliott, John H.A Home for the Homeless: A Sociological Exegesis of 1 Peter, Its Situation and Strategy. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981.Google Scholar

Elliott, John H. Review of Wayne A. Meeks, The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. Religious Studies Review 11 (1985), pp. 329–35.Google Scholar

Elliott, John H. “Social-Scientific Criticism of the New Testament: More on Methods and Models.” Semeia 35 (1986), 1–33.Google Scholar

Elliott, John H.What is Social-Scientific Criticism. Guides to Biblical Scholarship New Testament Series. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar

Ellis, E. Earle. “Gospels Criticism: A Perspective on the State of the Art,” in The Gospel and The Gospels. Edited by Stuhlmacher, Peter. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 26–52.Google Scholar

Ellis, E. Earle. The Old Testament in Early Christianity: Canon and Interpretation in the Light of Modern Research. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 54. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1991.Google Scholar

Enz, Jacob J. “The Book of Exodus as a Literary Type for the Gospel of John.” Journal of Biblical Literature 76 (1957), pp. 208–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esler, Philip F.Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esler, Philip F.The First Christians in Their Social Worlds: Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation. London: Routledge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esler, Philip F. “Community and Gospel in Early Christianity: A Response to Richard Bauckham's Gospels for All Christians.” Scottish Journal of Theology 51 (1998), pp. 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esler, Philip F., ed. Modelling Early Christianity: Social-Scientific studies of the New Testament in its Context. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eslinger, Lyle. “The Wooing of the Woman at the Well: Jesus, the Reader and Reader-Response Criticism.” Journal of Literature and Theology 1 (1987), pp. 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eslinger, Lyle. “Inner-Biblical Exegesis and Inner-Biblical Allusion: The Question of Category.” Vetus Testamentum 49 (1992), pp. 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Craig A. and Sanders, James A, eds. The Function of Scripture in Early Jewish and Christian Tradition. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 154. Studies in Scripture and Early Judaism and Christianity 6. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Evans, Christopher Francis. Saint Luke. Trinity Press International New Testament Commentaries. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1990.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Stephen. The Historical Christ and the Jesus of Faith: The Incarnational Narrative as History. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewald, Heinrich. History of Israel. 2 vols. Translated by Russell Martineau. London: Longmans and Green, 1869–86.Google Scholar

Fackre, Gabriel. “Narrative Theology: An Overview.” Interpretation 37 (1983), pp. 340–52.Google Scholar

Farley, Edward and Peter C. Hodgson. “Scripture and Tradition,” in Christian Theology: An Introduction to its Traditions and Tasks. Edited by Hodgson, Peter C and King, Robert H. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar

Farmer, William R. “The Problem of Christian Origins: A Programmatic Essay,” in Studies in the History and Text of the New Testament in Honor of Kenneth Willis Clark. Edited by Suggs, Daniel T. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1967, pp. 81–88.Google Scholar

Farmer, William R.Jesus and the Gospel: Tradition, Scripture, and Canon. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar

Farrell, Thomas J. “Kelber's Breakthrough.” Semeia 39 (1987), pp. 27–45.Google Scholar

Fascher, Erich. Die formgeschichtliche Methode: Eine Darstellung und Kritik, Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Synoptischen Problems. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 2. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fawcett, Thomas. Hebrew Myth and Christian Gospel. London: SCM Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. “The Use of the Definite Article with Personal Names in the Gospel of John.” NTS 17 (1970–71), pp. 168–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. “P75, P66 and Origen: The Myth of Early Textual Recension in Alexandria,” in New Dimensions in New Testament Study. Edited by Longenecker, Richard and Tenney, Merrill C. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1974, pp. 19–45.Google Scholar

Fee, Gordon D. “On the Text and Meaning of John 20, 30–31,” in The Four Gospels, 1992. 3 vols. Edited by Segbroek, F.et al. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1992, vol. Ⅲ, pp. 2193–205.Google Scholar

Feine, Paul. Theologie des Neuen Testaments. 21st edn. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1953.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Everett. “Factors Leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon: A Survey of Some Recent Studies,” in The Canon Debate. Edited by McDonald, Lee Martin and Sanders, James A. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2002, pp. 295–320.Google Scholar

Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Festinger, Leon, Riecken, Henry W, and Schachter, Stanley. When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group That Predicted the Destruction of the World. New York: Harper & Row, 1956. Repr. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fewell, Danna Nolan, ed. Reading between Texts: Intertextuality and the Hebrew Bible. Literary Currents in Biblical Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1992.Google Scholar

Filson, Floyd V. “The Significance of Early House Churches.” Journal of Biblical Literature 58 (1939), pp. 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, T. M. “Social Mobility, Imperial Civil Service and the Spread of Early Christianity.” Studia Patristica 17 (1982), pp. 31–37.Google Scholar

Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schüssler, ed. Aspects of Religious Propaganda in Judaism and Early Christianity. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schüssler, In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. London: SCM Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schüssler, The Book of Revelation: Justice and Judgment. 2nd edn. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998.Google Scholar

Fischel, Harry. “Studies in Cynicism and the Ancient Near East: The Transformation of a Chria,” in Religions in Antiquity: Essays in Memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough. Edited by Neusner, Jacob. Leiden: Brill, 1968, pp. 372–411.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A.The Gospel According to Luke Ⅰ–Ⅸ. The Anchor Bible 28. New York: Doubleday, 1981.Google Scholar

Flusser, David. Judaism and the Origins of Christianity. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, the Hebrew University, 1988.Google Scholar

Fodor, James. Christian Hermeneutics: Paul Ricoeur and the Refiguring of Theology. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forkman, Göran. The Limits of the Religious Community: Expulsion from the Religious Community within the Qumran Sect, within Rabbinic Judaism, and within Primitive Christianity. Coniectanea biblica, New Testament Series 5. Lund: Gleerup, 1972.Google Scholar

Fortna, Robert Tomson. The Gospel of Signs: A Reconstruction of the Narrative Source Underlying the Fourth Gospel. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Fortna, Robert Tomson. The Fourth Gospel and its Predecessor: From Narrative Source to Present Gospel. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1988.Google Scholar

Fortna, R. T. and Gaventa, B. R., eds. The Conversation Continues: Studies in Paul and John. Nashville: Abingdon, 1990.Google Scholar

Fowl, Stephen E.Engaging Scripture: A Model for Theological Interpretation. Challenges in Contemporary Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert M. “Who is ‘the Reader’ of Mark's Gospel?” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1983, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert M. “Who is ‘the Reader’ in Reader Response Criticism?” Semeia 31 (1985), pp. 5–23.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert M.Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.Google Scholar

France, R. T. “The Formula-Quotations of Matthew 2 and the Problem of Communication.” NTS 27 (1981), pp. 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

France, R. T. “Jewish Historiography, Midrash, and the Gospels,” in Gospel Perspectives Ⅲ: Studies in Midrash and Historiography. Edited by France, R. T. and Wenham, David. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1983, pp. 99–127.Google Scholar

France, R. T.Matthew: Evangelist and Teacher. Exeter: Paternoster, 1989.Google Scholar

Freed, Edwin D.Old Testament Quotations in the Gospel of John. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 11. Leiden: Brill, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freed, Edwin D. “Samaritan Influence in the Gospel of John” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 30 (1968), pp. 580–87.Google Scholar

Freed, Edwin D. “Did John Write His Gospel Partly to Win Samaritan Converts?” Novum Testamentum 12 (1970), pp. 241–56.Google Scholar

Freedman, Aviva and Medway, Peter. Genre and the New Rhetoric. Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W.The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W.The Identity of Jesus Christ: The Hermeneutical Basis of Dogmatic Theology. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans W. “The ‘Literal Reading’ of Biblical Narrative in the Christian Tradition: Does it Stretch or Will it Break?,” in The Bible and the Narrative Tradition. Edited by McConnell, Frank. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 36–77.Google Scholar

Frend, William H. C.Martyrdom and Persecution in the Early Church: A Study of a Conflict from the Maccabees to Donatus. New York: New York University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Frend, William H. C.The Rise of Christianity. London: Darton, Longman, & Todd, 1984.Google Scholar

Froehlich, Karlfried, ed. Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church. SECT. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Fuglseth, Kåre Sigvald. Johannine Sectarianism in Perspective: A Sociological, Historical, and Comparative Analysis of Temple and Social Relationships in the Gospel of John, Philo, and Qumran. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 119. Leiden: Brill, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Reginald H.The Foundations of New Testament Christology. London: Lutterworth Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Gagé, Jean. Les Classes socials dans l'empire romain. Bibliothèque historique. Paris: Payot, 1964.Google Scholar

Gager, John G.Kingdom and Community: The Social World of Early Christianity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar

Gager, John G. “Social Description and Sociological Explanation.” Religious Studies Review 5 (1979), pp. 174–80.Google Scholar

Gager, John G. “Shall We Marry our Enemies? Sociology and the New Testament.” Interpretation 36 (1982), pp. 256–65.Google Scholar

Gager, John G. Review of Robert M. Grant, Early Christianity and Society: Seven Studies; Abraham J. Malherbe, Social Aspects of Early Christianity; and Gerd Theissen, Sociology of Early Palestinian Christianity. Religious Studies Review 5 (1979), pp. 174–80.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Eugene V.Divine Man or Magician? Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 64. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Gamble, Harry Y.Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Alan. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions of Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar

Gerhart, Mary. “Generic Studies: Their Renewed Importance in Religious and Literary Interpretation.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 45 (1977), pp. 309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerhart, Mary. “Generic Competence in Biblical Hermeneutics.” Semeia 43 (1988), pp. 29–44.Google Scholar

Gese, Hartmut. Essays on Biblical Theology. Translated by Keith Crim. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1981.Google Scholar

Gill, D. W. J. and Gempf, C., eds. The Book of Acts in Its Graeco-Roman Setting. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.Google Scholar

Gill, Robin. “Berger's Plausibility Structures: A Response to Professor Cairns.” Scottish Journal of Theology 27 (1974), pp. 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, Robin. Theology and Social Structure. London: Mowbrays, 1977.Google Scholar

Glasson, T. Francis. Moses in the Fourth Gospel. Studies in Biblical Theology 40. London: SCM Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Glasswell, M. E. “St. Matthew's Gospel — History or Book.” Communio Viatorum 24 (1981), pp. 41–45.Google Scholar

Glaue, Paul. Die Vorlesung heiliger Schriften im Gottesdiente. 1 Teil. Bis zur Entstehung der alkatholischen Kirche. Berlin: University of Berlin, 1907.Google Scholar

Gloag, Paton J.Introduction to the Johannine Writings. London: James Nisbet, 1891.Google Scholar

Goetchius, E. V. N. Review of Lane C. McGaughy, Toward a Descriptive Analysis of EINAI as a Linking Verb in New Testament Greek. Journal of Biblical Literature 95 (1976), pp. 147–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goguel, Maurice. The Birth of Christianity. Translated by H. P. Snape. London: Allen & Unwin, 1953.Google Scholar

Goldingay, John. Models for Scripture. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.Google Scholar

Goldingay, John. Models for Interpretation of Scripture. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Goode, Erich. “Some Critical Observations on the Church-Sect Dimension.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 6 (1967), pp. 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goppelt, Leonhard. Typos: The Typological Interpretation of the Old Testament in the New. Translated by Donald H. Madvig. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1982.Google Scholar

Goulder, Michael D.Midrash and Lection in Matthew. London: SPCK, 1974.Google Scholar

Goulder, Michael D.The Evangelist's Calendar: A Lectionary Explanation of the Development of Scripture. London: SPCK, 1978.Google Scholar

Goulder, Michael D.Luke: A New Paradigm. Sheffield: Shefffield Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Goulder, Michael D. “The Pre-Markan Gospel.” Scottish Journal of Theology 47 (1994), pp. 453–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, Willaim A. “Scripture,” in The Encyclopedia of Religion. Edited by Eliade, Mircea. 16 vols. New York: Macmillan, 1987, vol. Ⅳ, pp. 133–45.Google Scholar

Grant, Robert M.Early Christianity and Society: Seven Studies. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. “Scripture and Theology: Failed Experiments, Fresh Perspectives.” Interpretation 56 (2002), pp. 4–20.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B., ed. Hearing the New Testament: Strategies for Interpretation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B., McKnight, Scot, and Marshall, I. Howard, eds. Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Greene, Kevin. The Archaeology of the Roman Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Greene-McCreight, Kathryn E.“Ad Litteram” How Augustine, Calvin, and Barth Read the “Plain Sense” of Genesis 1–3. IST 5. New York: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar

Gregory, C. R. “The Reading of Scripture in the Church in the Second Century.” American Journal of Theology 13 (1908), pp. 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grüneberg, Keith Nigel. Abraham, Blessing, and the Nations: A Philological and Exegetical Study of Genesis 12:3 in its Narrative Context. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 332. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilding, Aileen. The Fourth Gospel and Jewish Worship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert H. “Recent Investigations into the Literary Genre ‘Gospel,’” in New Dimensions in New Testament Study. Edited by Longenecker, Richard N and Tenney, Merrill C. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1974, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert H.Jesus the Word According to John the Sectarian: A Paleofundamentalist Manifesto for Contemporary Evangelicalism, especially Its Elites, in North America. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar

Guelich, Robert. “The Gospel Genre,” in The Gospel and The Gospels. Edited by Stuhlmacher, Peter. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 173–208.Google Scholar

Guijarro, Santiago. “Why Does the Gospel of Mark Begin as It Does?” Biblical Theology Bulletin 33 (2003), pp. 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann. The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga and History. Translated by W. H. Carruth. New York: Schocken Books, 1964.Google Scholar

Gunton, Colin E.A Brief Theology of Revelation: The 1993 Warfield Lectures. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1995.Google Scholar

Gusfield, Joseph R.Community: A Critical Response. Key Concepts in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Joseph, ed. Ancient Synagogues: The State of Research. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Güttgemanns, Erhardt. Candid Questions concerning Gospel Form Criticism: A Methodological Sketch of the Fundamental Problematics of Form and Redaction Critics. Translated by William G. Doty. 2nd edn. The Pittsburgh Theological Monograph Series 26. Pittsburgh: Pickwick Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon, 1984.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Philosophical Discourses of Modernity. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity, 1987.Google Scholar

Hadas, Moses and Smith, Morton. Heroes and Gods: Spiritual Biographies in Antiquity. Religious Perspectives Series 13. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.Google Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst. “Aus der Literatur zum Johannesevangelium 1929–1956.” Theologische Rundschau 23 (1955), pp. 295–33.Google Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst. “Neuere Literatur zu den Johannesbriefen.” Theologische Rundschau 26 (1960), pp. 1–43, pp. 267–91.Google Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst. “‘Der Vater der mich gesandt hat.’” NTS 9 (1963), pp. 208–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst. John: A Commentary on the Gospel of John. 2 vols. Translated by Robert W. Funk. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984.Google Scholar

Hägerland, Tobias. “John's Gospel: A Two-Level Drama?” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 25 (2003), pp. 309–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagner, Donald A.Matthew 1–13. Word Biblical Commentary 33a. Dallas: Word, 1993.Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. “Anti-languages.” American Anthropologist 78 (1976), pp. 570–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K.Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park, 1978.Google Scholar

Hampson, Norman. The Enlightenment. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968.Google Scholar

Hanson, K. C. and Oakman, Douglas E. Palestine in the Time of Jesus: Social Structures and Social Conflicts. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998.Google Scholar

Hanson, Paul D.The Dawn of Apocalyptic: The Historical and Sociological Roots of Jewish Apocalyptic Eschatology. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. P. C.Tradition in the Early Church. London: SCM Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. P. C.Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen's Interpretation of Scripture. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2003. Repr. Richmond: John Knox, 1959.Google Scholar

Hare, Douglas R. A.The Theme of Jewish Persecution of Christians in the Gospel According to St. Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harland, Philip A.Associations, Synagogues, and Congregations: Claiming a Place in Ancient Mediterranean Society. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.Google Scholar

Harrington, Daniel J. “Sociological Concepts and the Early Church: A Decade of Research.” Theological Studies 41 (1980), pp. 181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, Daniel J. “Second Testament Exegesis and the Social Sciences.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 18–19 (1988–89), pp. 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Marvin. The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. Rev. and enl. edn. Oxford: Altamira Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Harvey, A.The Historian and the Believer: The Morality of Historical Knowledge and Christian Belief. Chicago: University of Illinois, 1966. Repr. New York: Macmillan, 1996.Google Scholar

Hatch, Edwin. The Organization of the Early Christian Churches. 4th edn. Bampton Lectures for 1880. London: Longmans & Green, 1892.Google Scholar

Hatina, Thomas R. “Intertextuality and Historical Criticism in New Testament Studies: Is There a Relationship?” Biblical Interpretation 7 (1999), pp. 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hays, Richard B.Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. “Can the Gospels Teach us to Read the Old Testament?” Pro Ecclesia 11 (2002), pp. 403–18.Google Scholar

Heinrici, Georg C. F. “Die Christengemeinde Korinths und die religiösen Genossenschaften der Griechen.” Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Theologie 19 (1876), pp. 464–526.Google Scholar

Heinrici, Georg C. F.Der Zweite Brief an die Korinther. 7th edn. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 6. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1890.Google Scholar

Hendriksen, William. Exposition of the Gospel According to John. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1953.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. “Die Synagogeninschrift von Stobi.” ZNW 57 (1966), pp. 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengel, Martin. “Proseuche und Synagoge: Jüdische Gemeinde, Gotteshaus und Gottesdienst in der Diaspora und in Palästina,” in Tradition und Glaube: Das frühe Christentum in seiner Umwelt: Festgabe für Karl Georg Kuhn. Edited by Jeremias, Gert, Heinz-Wolfgang Kuhn, , and Stegemann, Hartmut. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1971, pp. 157–83.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. “Die Ursprünge der christlichen Mission.” NTS 18 (1971), pp. 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Judaism and Hellenism: Studies in their Encounter in Palestine during the Early Hellenistic Period. Translated by John Bowden. London: SCM Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Acts and the History of Earliest Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Studies in the Gospel of Mark. Translated by John Bowden. London: SCM Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. The Johannine Question. Translated by John Bowden. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1989.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. “Literary, Theological, and Historical Problems in the Gospel of Mark,” in The Gospel and The Gospels. Edited by Stuhlmacher, Peter. Translated by John Bowden. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 209–51.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. Die Johanneische Frage: Ein Lösungsversuch. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 67. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1993.Google Scholar

Hengel, Martin. The Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus Christ: An Investigation of the Collection and Origin of the Canonical Gospels. Translated by John Bowden. London: SCM Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hill, Charles E.The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilton, Michael and Marshall, Gordian. The Gospels and Rabbinic Judaism. London: SCM Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. Jr.Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. Jr.The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. Jr. “Meaning and Significance Reinterpreted.” CI 11 (1984), pp. 202–24.Google Scholar

Hobbs, Edward C. “Norman Perrin on Methodology in the Interpretation of Mark,” in Christology and a Modern Pilgrimage: A Discussion with Norman Perrin. Edited by Betz, Hans Dieter. Missoula, Mont.: Society of Biblical Literature, 1974, pp. 53–60.Google Scholar

Hock, Ronald F.The Social Context of Paul's Ministry: Tentmaking and Apostleship. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.Google Scholar

Hofrichter, Peter Leander. Für und wider die Priorität des Johannesevangeliums. Theologische Texte und Studien 9. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2002.Google Scholar

Holladay, Carl R.Theios Aner in Hellenistic Judaism: A Critique. Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 40. Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Holliday, Michael A. K. “Anti-languages.” American Anthropologist 78 (1976), pp. 570–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holliday, Michael A. K.Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park, 1978.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Bengt. Paul and Power: The Structure of Authority in the Primitive Church as Reflected in the Pauline Epistles. Coniectanea biblica, New Testament Series 11. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Bengt. Sociology and the New Testament: An Appraisal. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar

Holmes, Michael, ed. Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations. Rev. edn. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Hooker, Morna D. “On Using the Wrong Tool.” Theology 75 (1972), pp. 570–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horbury, W. “The Benediction of the Minim and the Early Jewish-Christian Controversy.” Journal of Theological Studies 33 (1982), pp. 19–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsley, Richard A. “Popular Prophetic Movements at the Time of Jesus: Their Principle Features and Social Origins.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 26 (1986), pp. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsley, Richard A.Sociology and the Jesus Movement. New York: Crossroad, 1989.Google Scholar

Hoskyns, Edwyn C. The Fourth Gospel. Edited by Davey, Frances Noel. London: Faber & Faber, 1940.Google Scholar

Howard-Brook, Wes. Becoming Children of God: John's Gospel and Radical Discipleship. The Bible and Liberation Series. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Huie-Jolly, Mary R. “Threats Answered by Enthronement: Death/Resurrection and the Divine Warrior Myth in John 5.17–29, Psalm 2 and Daniel 7,” in Studies in Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity: Investigations and Proposals. Edited by Evans, Craig A and Sanders, James A. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 148. Studies in Scripture and Early Judaism and Christianity 5. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997, pp. 191–217.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, George and Placher, William C, ed. Theology and Narrative: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W.Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Ibuki, Yu, “‘Viele glaubten an ihn’ — Auseinandersetzung mit dem Glauben im Johannesevangelium.” Annual of the Japanese Biblical Institute 9 (1983), pp. 128–83.Google Scholar

Instone-Brewer, David. “The Eighteen Benedictions and the Minim before 70 CE.” Journal of Theological Studies 54 (2003), pp. 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isenberg, Sheldon R. “Millenarianism in Greco-Roman Palestine.” Religion 4 (1974), pp. 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Asthetic Response. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. “Interaction between Text and Reader,” in The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation. Edited by Suleiman, Susan R and Crosman, Inge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980, pp. 106–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson-Widding, Anita, ed. Identity: Personal and Socio-Cultural: A Symposium. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiskell, 1983.Google Scholar

Jarvie, Ian Charles. The Revolution in Anthropology. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1967.Google Scholar

Jensen, Alexander S.John's Gospel as Witness: The Development of the Early Christian Language of Faith. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Jeremias, Joachim. The Parables of Jesus. Translated by S. H. Hooke. London: SCM Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Jeremias, Joachim. Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. Translated by F. H. Cave and C. H. Cave. London: SCM Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Jewett, Robert. The Thessalonian Correspondence: Pauline Rhetoric and Millenarian Piety. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986.Google Scholar

Johnson, Benton. “On Church and Sect.” American Sociological Review 28 (1963), pp. 539–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. “On Finding the Lukan Community: A Cautious Cautionary Essay,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1979, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation. Rev. edn. London: SCM Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Jonge, Henk Jan de. “‘The ‘Jews’ in the Gospel of John,” in Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Bieringer, Reimund, Pollefeyt, Didier, and Vandecasteele-Vanneuville, Frederique. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 121–40.Google Scholar

Jonge, Marinus. “Nicodemus and Jesus: Some Observations on Misunderstanding and Understanding in the Fourth Gospel.” BJTL 53 (1971), pp. 337–59.Google Scholar

Jonge, Marinus de. “Christology, Controversy, and Community in the Gospel of John,” in Christology, Controversy, and Community: New Testament Essays in Honour of David R. Catchpole. Edited by Horrell, David G and Tuckett, Christopher M. Novum Testamentum, Supplements 99. Leiden: Brill, 2000, pp. 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonge, Marinus, ed. L'Evangile de Jean: Sources, rédaction, théologie. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 44. Gembloux: Duculot, 1977.Google Scholar

Judge, Edwin A.The Social Pattern of Early Christian Groups in the First Century: Some Prolegomena to the Study of New Testament Ideas of Social Obligation. London: Tyndale, 1960.Google Scholar

Judge, Edwin A. “The Early Christians as a Scholastic Community,” Journal of Religious History 1 (1960), pp. 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, Edwin A. “The Early Christians as a Scholastic Community: Part Ⅱ,” Journal of Religious History 1 (1960), pp. 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, Edwin A. “The Social Identity of the First Christians: A Question of Method in Religious History.” Journal of Religious History 11 (1980), pp. 201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, Edwin A.Rank and Status in the World of Caesars and St. Paul. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 1982.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. The Testament of Jesus: A Study of the Gospel of John in Light of Chapter 17. Translated by Gerhard Krodel. London: SCM Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernst. “The Beginnings of Christian Theology,” in New Testament Quotations of Today. Edited by Käsemann, Ernst. London: SCM Press, 1969, pp. 82–107.Google Scholar

Katz, Steven T. “Issues in the Separation of Judaism and Christianity After 70 CE: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Biblical Literature 103 (1984), pp. 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazen, Thomas. “Sectarian Gospels for Some Christians? Intention and Mirror Reading in the Light of Extra-Canonical Texts.” NTS 51 (2005), pp. 561–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kea, Perry V. “Writing a bios: Matthew's Genre Choices and Rhetorical Situation,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1994, pp. 574–86.Google Scholar

Keck, Leander E. “Mark 3:7–12 and Mark's Christology.” Journal of Biblical Literature 84 (1965), pp. 341–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, Leander E. “On the Ethos of Early Christians.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 42 (1974), pp. 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. “Aretalogy and Gospel.” Journal of Biblical Literature 92 (1973), pp. 402–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. Community of the New Age: Studies in Mark's Gospel. London: SCM Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. Jesus in History: An Approach to the Study of the Gospels. 2nd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. Christian Origins in Sociological Perspective. London: SCM Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. Knowing the Truth: A Sociological Approach to New Testament Interpretation. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. “Synoptic Studies,” in The New Testament and its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Epp, Eldon Jay and MacRae, George W. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989, pp. 245–89.Google Scholar

Kee, Howard Clark. Who are the People of God? Early Christian Models of Community. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Keener, Craig S.The Gospel of John: A Commentary. 2 vols. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2003.Google Scholar

Kelber, Werner H.The Kingdom in Mark: A New Place and a New Time. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974.Google Scholar

Kelber, Werner H.Mark's Story of Jesus. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Kelber, Werner H.The Oral and the Written Gospel: The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and Q. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar

Kelber, Werner H. “Narrative as Interpretation and Interpretation of Narrative: Hermeneutical Reflections on the Gospels.” Semeia 39 (1987), pp. 107–33.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A.New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. SR. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kermode, Frank. The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, G. D.The Origins of the Gospel According to St. Matthew. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946.

Kimmelman, Reuven. “Birkat Ha-Minim and the Lack of Evidence for an Anti-Christian Jewish Prayer in Late Antiquity,” in Aspects of Judaism in the Graeco-Roman Period. Edited by Sanders, E. P. and Baumgarten, A. I.. London: SCM Press, 1981, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 226–44.Google Scholar

King, K. “Kingdom in the Gospel of Thomas.” Foundations and Facets Forum 3 (1987), pp. 48–97.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Jack Dean. Matthew as Story. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Jack Dean. “Reflections on ‘The Reader’ in Matthew's Gospel.” NTS 34 (1988), pp. 442–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsbury, Jack Dean. “Conclusion: Analysis of a Conversation,” in Social History of the Matthean Community: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches. Edited by Balch, David L. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, pp. 259–69.Google Scholar

Kippenberg, Hans G. “Ein Vergleich jüdischer, christlicher und gnostischer Apokalyptik,” in Apocalypticism in the Mediterranean World and the Near East: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Apocalypticism: Uppsala: August 12–17, 1979. Edited by Hellholm, David. Tübingen: Mohr, 1983, pp. 751–68.Google Scholar

Kirk, Alan. “The Johannine Jesus in the Gospel of Peter: A Social Memory Approach,” in Jesus in Johannine Tradition. Edited by Fortna, Robert T and Thatcher, Tom. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001, pp. 313–21.Google Scholar

Klauck, Hans-Joseph. Hausgemeinde und Hauskirche im Frühen Christentum. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1981.Google Scholar

Klauck, Hans-Joseph. “Die Hausgemeinde als Lebensform im Urchristentum.” Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift 32 (1981), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Klauck, Hans-Joseph. “Community, History, and Text(s) — a Response.” Paper presented at Life in Abundance: An International Conference on the Gospel of John: A Tribute to Raymond E. Brown. Baltimore, October 16–18, 2003.

Klijn, A. F. J.Jewish-Christian Gospel Tradition. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae: Texts and Studies of Early Christian Life and Language 17. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar

Kline, Meredith G. “The Old Testament Origins of the Gospel Genre.” WTJ 38 (1975), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Klink, Edward W. Ⅲ. “The Gospel Community Debate: State of the Question.” Currents in Biblical Research 3.1 (2004), pp. 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kloppenborg, John S.The Formation of Q: Trajectories in Ancient Wisdom Collections. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar

Knierim, Rolf. “Old Testament Form Criticism Reconsidered.” Interpretation 27 (1973), pp. 435–68.Google Scholar

Knight, Douglas A. “The Understanding of ‘Sitz im Leben’ in Form Criticism,” in Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press, 1973, pp. 105–25.Google Scholar

Koehler, Ludwig. Das formgeschichtliche Problem des Neuen Testaments. Leiden: Brill, 1924.Google Scholar

Koch, Klaus. The Growth of the Biblical Tradition: The Form-Critical Method. Translated by S. M. Cupitt. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1969.Google Scholar

Koester, Craig R.Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel: Meaning, Mystery, Community. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar

Koester, Craig R. “The Spectrum of Johannine Readers,” in “What is John?” Readers and Readings of the Fourth Gospel. Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 3. Edited by Segovia, Fernando F. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. “One Jesus and Four Primitive Gospels,” in Trajectories through Early Christianity. Edited by Robinson, James M and Koester, Helmut. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971, pp. 158–204.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. Introduction to the New Testament: History and Literature of Early Christianity. 2 vols. Translated by Walter de Gruyter. Hermenia: Foundations and Facets. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982.Google Scholar

Koester, Helmut. Ancient Christian Gospels. London: SCM Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Köstenberger, Andreas J.The Missions of Jesus and The Disciples According to the Fourth Gospel: With Implications for the Fourth Gospel's Purpose and the Mission of the Contemporary Church. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Kraeling, Carl H.The Christian Building. The Excavations at Dura-Europos: Final Reports. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967, vol. Ⅷ, pt. 2.Google Scholar

Kraft, Heinrich. “Die Evangelien und die Geschichte Jesu.” Theologische Zeitschrift 37 (1981), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar

Kreissig, Heinz. “Zur sozialen Zusammensetzung der frühchristlichen Gemeinde im ersten Jahrhundert u. Z.” Eirene: Studia Graeca at Latina 6 (1967), pp. 91–100.Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. Semiotiké: recherches pour une sémanalyse: extraits. Paris: Seuil, 1969.Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. La Révolution du langage poétique: l'avant-garde à la fin du ⅩⅨe siècle: Lautréamont et Mallarmé. Paris: Seuil, 1974.Google Scholar

Kügler, Joachim. “Das Johannesevangelium und seine Gemeinde — kein Thema für Science Fiction.” Biblische Notizen 23 (1984), pp. 48–62.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Karl Gustav. “Das Problem der Mission in der Urchristenheit.” Evangelische Missions-Zeitschrift 11 (1954), pp. 167–68.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd and enl. edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner G.The New Testament: The History of the Investigation of its Problems. Translated by S. McClean Gilmour and Howard C. Kee. London: SCM Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner G.Introduction to the New Testament. Translated by Howard C. Kee Nashville: Abingdon, 1975.Google Scholar

Kurz, William S. “Intertextual Permutations of the Genesis Word in the Johannine Prologues,” in Studies in Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity: Investigations and Proposals. Edited by Evans, Craig A and Sanders, James A. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 148. Studies in Scripture and Early Judaism and Christianity 5. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997, pp. 179–90.Google Scholar

Kysar, Robert. The Fourth Evangelist and His Gospel. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1975.Google Scholar

Kysar, Robert. John, The Maverick Gospel. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1976.Google Scholar