Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T02:33:13.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Deictic points in the visual–gestural and tactile–gestural modalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

David Quinto-Pozos
Affiliation:
Teacher Department of Linguistics at the University of Pittsburgh
Richard P. Meier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A Deaf-Blind person has only one channel through which conventional language can be communicated, and that channel is touch. Thus, if a Deaf-Blind person uses signed language for communication, he must place his hands on top of the signer's hands and follow that signer's hands as they form various handshapes and move through the signing space. A sign language such as American Sign Language (ASL) that is generally perceived through vision must, in this case, be perceived through touch.

Given that contact between the signer's hands and the receiver's hands is necessary for the Deaf-Blind person to perceive a signed language, we may wonder about the absence of the nonmanual signals of visual–gestural language (e.g. eyebrow shifts, head orientation, eye gaze). These elements play a significant role in the grammar of signed languages, often allowing for the occurrence of various word orders and syntactic structures. One of the central questions motivating this study was how the absence of such nonmanual elements might influence the form that tactile-gestural language takes.

Thus, this study began as an effort to describe the signed language production of Deaf-Blind individuals with a focus on areas where nonmanual signals would normally be used in visual–gestural language. However, after reviewing the narrative data from this study, it quickly became evident that the Deaf-Blind subjects did not utilize nonmanual signals in their signed language production.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahan, Benjamin 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University
Bahan, Benjamin, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, and Carol Neidle. 1995. Convergent evidence for the structure of determiner phrases in American Sign Language. In FLSM VII. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, Vol. Two: Syntax II & Semantics/Pragmatics, ed. Leslie Gabriele, Debra Hardison, and Robert Westmoreland, 1–12. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club
Baker, Charlotte. 1976a. Eye-openers in American Sign Language. California Linguistics Association Conference Proceedings
Baker, Charlotte. 1976b. What's not on the other hand in American Sign Language. In Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Baker, Charlotte., and Carol A. Padden. 1978. Focusing on the nonmanual components of American Sign Language. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. Patricia Siple, 27–57. New York: Academic Press
Bendixen, B. 1975. Eye behaviors functioning in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, Salk Institute and University of California, San Diego, CA
Cokely, Dennis. 1983. When is a pidgin not a pidgin? An alternative analysis of the ASL-English contact situation. Sign Language Studies 38:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Steve, and Karen Petronio. 1998. What happens in Tactile ASL? In Pinky extension and eyegaze: Language in deaf communities, ed. Ceil Lucas, 18–37. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. The ubiquitous point. Sign 6:2–10Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1966. The problem of universals in language. In Universals of language, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 1–29. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Iverson, Jana M., and Susan, Goldin-Meadow. 1997. What's communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Developmental Psychology 33:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, Jana M., Heather, L. Tencer, Jill, Lany, and Susan, Goldin-Meadow. 2000. The relation between gesture and speech in congenitally blind and sighted language-learners. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24:105–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegl, Judy A. 1986. Clitics in American Sign Language. In The syntax of pronominal clitics, ed. Hagit Borer, 285–309. New York: Academic Press
Kegl, Judy A. 1995. The manifestation and grammatical analysis of clitics in American Sign Language. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society 31:140–167Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton
Liddell, Scott K. 1995. Real, Surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, gesture, and space, eds. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Edward S. Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 191–210. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Liddell, Scott K. and Melanie, Metzger. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30:657–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 175–190. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA
Padden, Carol. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Sign language research: Theoretical issues, ed. Ceil Lucas, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
Petronio, Karen. 1988. Interpreting for Deaf-Blind students: Factors to consider. American Annals of the Deaf 133:226–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petronio, Karen. 1993. Clause structure in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington
Reed, Charlotte M., Lorraine, A. Delhorne, Nathaniel, I. Durlach, and Susan, D. Fischer. 1990. A study of the tactual and visual reception of fingerspelling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33:786–797CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, Charlotte M., Nathaniel I. Durlach, and Lorraine A. Delhorne. 1992. Natural methods of tactual communication. In Tactile aids for the hearing impaired, ed. Ian R. Summers, 218–230. London: Whurr
Reed, Charlotte M., Lorraine, A. Delhorne, Nathaniel, I. Durlach, and Susan, D. Fischer. 1995. A study of the tactual reception of Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38:477–489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urwin, Cathy 1979. Preverbal communication and early language development in blind children. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 17:119-127
Winston, Elizabeth A. 1991. Spatial referencing and cohesion in an American Sign Language text. Sign Language Studies 73:397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. 1973. Some characteristics of Pidgin Sign English. Sign Language Studies 3:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarnall, Gary D. 1980. Preferred methods of communication of four Deaf-Blind Adults: A field report of four selected case studies. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf 13:1–8Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×