Select bibliography

Harold Love

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511483165.015

Alaya, Flavia. William Sharp–Fiona Macleod (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970)

Appleyard, J. A. Becoming a Reader: The Experience of Fiction from Childhood to Adulthood (Cambridge University Press, 1991)

Armstrong, Edward A. Shakespeare's Imagination: A Study of the Psychology of Association and Inspiration (London: Drummond, 1946)

Baines, Paul. The House of Forgery in Eighteenth-century Britain (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999)

Barthes, Roland. ‘The death of the author’, in Image, Music, Text: Essays, selected and translated by Stephen Heath (London: Fontana, 1977), pp. 142–8

Bate, Jonathan. The Genius of Shakespeare (London: Picador, 1997)

Beal, Peter. In Praise of Scribes: Manuscripts and their Makers in Seventeenth-century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)

Bédier, Joseph. Etudes critiques (Paris: A. Colin, 1903)

Behn, Aphra. The Works of Aphra Behn, ed. Janet Todd, 7 vols. (London: William Pickering, 1996)

Bentley, Gerald Eades. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare's Time, 1590–1642 (Princeton University Press, 1971; corr. repr. 1986)

Bentley, Richard. A Dissertation upon the Epistles of Phalaris. With an Answer tothe Objections of the Honourable Charles Boyle (London, 1699)

Billman, Carol. The Secret of the Stratemeyer Syndicate: Nancy Drew, The Hardy Boys, and the Million Dollar Fiction Factory (New York: Ungar, 1986)

Binongo, José Nilo G. and Smith, M. W. A.. ‘The application of principal component analysis to stylometry’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 14 (1999), 445–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Boswell, James. Boswell's Life of Johnson, ed. George Birkbeck Hill, rev. L. F. Powell, 6 vols.(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934)

Brainerd, Barron. ‘The chronology of Shakespeare's plays: a statistical study’, Computers and the Humanities 14 (1980), 221–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Burke, Séan. The Death and Return of the Author (Edinburgh University Press, 1992)

Burns, Ann with Barbara Hoffert. ‘First novels’, Library Journal, 15 March 1988, 31–5

Burrows, John. Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen's Novels and an Experiment in Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)

Burrows, John ‘Computers and the study of literature’, in Christopher S. Butler, ed. Computers and Written Texts (Oxford: Blackwells, 1992), pp. 167–204

Burrows, John ‘Not unless you ask nicely: the interpretative nexus between analysis and information’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 7 (1992), 91–110CrossRef

Burrows, John ‘A computational approach to the Rochester canon’, in The Works of John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, ed. Harold Love (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 681–705

Burrows, John and Craig, D. H.. ‘Lyrical drama and the “turbid mountebanks”: styles of dialogue in Romantic and Renaissance tragedy’, Computers and the Humanities 28 (1994), 63–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Burrows, John and Hassall, Anthony J.. ‘Anna Boleyn and the authenticity of Fielding'sfeminine narratives’, Eighteenth-century Studies 21 (1988), 427–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Burrows, John and Love, Harold. ‘Attribution tests and the editing of seventeenth-century poetry’, Yearbook of English Studies 29 (1999), 151–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Burrows, John and Harold Love ‘Did Aphra Behn write “Caesar's Ghost”?’, in David Garrioch et al., eds. The Culture of the Book: Essays from Two Hemispheres in Honour of Wallace Kirsop (Melbourne: Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand, 1999), pp. 148–72

Butler, Samuel. The Authoress of the Odyssey: where and when she wrote, who shewas, the use she made of the Iliad, and how the poem grew under her hands, introd. David Grene(University of Chicago Press, 1967), repr. of 2nd edn (London, 1922)

Byrne, Muriel St Clare. ‘Bibliographical clues in collaborate plays’, The Library, 4th ser. 13 (1932), 21–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Carrier, Hubert. ‘La critique d'attribution au confluent des méthodes de l'histoire littéraire: l'exemple des Mazarinades de Cyrano de Bergerac’, in Luc Fraisse, ed. L'Histoire littéraire: ses méthodes et ses résultats. Mélanges offertsà Madeleine Bertaud (Geneva: Droz, 2001), pp. 153–66

Carter, John and Graham Pollard. An Enquiry into the Nature of Certain Nineteenth Century Pamphlets, 2nd edn, ed. Nicolas Barker and John Collins; with Nicolas Barker and John Collins, A Sequel to An Enquiryinto the Nature of Certain Nineteenth Century Pamphlets by John Carter and Graham Pollard: The Forgeries of H. Buxton Forman and T. J. Wise Re-examined, 2 vols. (London: Scolar Press, 1983)

Carter, Rita with Christopher Frith. Mapping the Mind (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998)

Chambers, R. W.‘The three texts of “Piers Plowman”, and their grammatical forms’, Modern Language Review 14 (1919), 129–51Google Scholar

Chambers, R. W. ‘Shakespeare and the play of More’, in Man's Unconquerable Mind: Studies of English Writers, from Bede to A. E. Houseman and W. P. Ker (London: Cape, 1939; repr. 1964), pp. 204–49 and Note pp. 407–8

Clark, Peter. British Clubs and Societies 1580–1800 (Oxford University Press, 2000)

Coady, C. A. J. Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992)

Congreve, William. The Complete Plays of William Congreve, ed. Herbert Davis(University of Chicago Press, 1967)

Cox, John D. and David Scott Kastan, eds. A New History of Early English Drama(New York: Columbia University Press, 1997)

Craig, Hugh. ‘Authorial attribution and computational stylistics: if you can tell authors apart, have you learned anything about them?’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 14 (1999), 103–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh ‘Is the author really dead? An empirical study of authorship in English Renaissance drama’, Empirical Studies of the Arts 18 (2000), 119–34CrossRef

Crane, Mary Thomas. Shakespeare's Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory (Princeton University Press, 2001)

Damasio, Antonio. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (London: Heinemann, 1999)

Davis, Tom. ‘The analysis of handwriting: an introductory survey’, in Peter Davison, ed. The Book Encompassed: Studies in Twentieth-century Bibliography (Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 57–68

Deloffre, Frédéric. ‘Quelques réflexions sur la critique d'attribution’, in Luc Fraisse, ed. L'Histoire littéraire: ses méthodes et ses résultats. Mélanges offerts à Madeleine Bertaud (Geneva: Droz, 2001), pp. 247–71

Dixon, Peter and Mannion, David. ‘Goldsmith's periodical essays: a statistical analysis of eleven doubtful cases’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (1993), 1–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Dryden, John. The Works of John Dryden, gen. eds. H. T. Swedenberg, jr and Alan Roper, 19 vols. to date (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1956–)

Duncan-Jones, Elsie. ‘Marvell, R. F. and the authorship of “Blake's victory”’, English Manuscript Studies 5 (1995), 110–11Google Scholar

Dyregrov, David. ‘Jo. Haines as librettist for Purcell's Fairy Queen’, Restoration and 18th Century Theatre Research, 2nd ser. 7 (1992), 29–46Google Scholar

Elias, A. C., jr. ‘Senatus Consultum: revising verse in Swift's Dublin circle, 1729–1735’, in Reading Swift: Papers from the Third Münster Symposium on Jonathan Swift [1994], eds. Hermann J. Real and Helgard Stöver-Leidig (Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1998), pp. 249–67

Ellegård, Alvar. A Statistical Method for Determining Authorship, Gothenberg Studies in English 13 (University of Gothenberg, 1962)

Ellegård, Alvar Who was Junius? (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1962)

Elliott, Ward E. Y. and Valenza, Robert J.. ‘And then there were none: winnowing the Shakespeare claimants’, Computers and the Humanities 30 (1996), 191–245CrossRef Google Scholar

Elliott, Ward E. Y. and Robert J. Valenza ‘Glass slippers and seven-league boots: C-prompted doubts about ascribing A funeral elegy and A lover's complaint to Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Quarterly 48 (1997), 177–207CrossRef

Elliott, Ward E. Y. and Robert J. Valenza ‘The professor doth protest too much, methinks: problems with the Foster “response”’, Computers and the Humanities 32 (1998), 425–90CrossRef

Erasmus, Desiderius. Patristic Scholarship. The Edition of St Jerome, ed., trans. and annotated by James F. Brady and John C. Olin, vol. ⅬⅪ of Collected Works of Erasmus (University of Toronto Press, 1992)

Erdman, David V. ‘The signature of style’, in David V. Erdman and Ephim G. Fogel, eds., Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), pp. 45–68

Erdman, David V. and Ephim G. Fogel, eds. Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966) [Collecting papers originally published in the Bulletin of the New York Public Library, 1957–61]

Ezell, Margaret. Social Authorship and the Advent of Print (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999)

Farringdon, Jill M. et al. Analysing for Authorship: A Guide to the Cusum Technique (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1996)

Fielding, Henry. New Essays by Henry Fielding: His Contributions to the ‘Craftsman’(1734–1739) and Other Early Journalism, ed. Martin Battestin, with a stylometric analysis by Michael G. Farringdon (Charlottesville: Virginia University Press, 1989)

Filloy, Richard. ‘Deciding the authorship of a doubtful text: the case of John Selden's Table-talk’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984), 41–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Finlay, Michael. Western Writing Implements in the Age of the Quill Pen (Wetheral: Plains Books, 1990)

Fitch, John G.‘Sense-pauses and relative dating in Seneca, Sophocles and Shakespeare’, American Journal of Philology 102 (1981), 289–307CrossRef Google Scholar

Fogel, Ephim G. ‘Salmons in both, or some caveats for canonical scholars’, in David V. Erdman and Ephim G. Fogel, eds., Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), pp. 69–101

Forsyth, Richard S. and Holmes, David I.. ‘Feature-finding for text classification’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 11 (1996), 163–74Google Scholar

Forsyth, Richard S. and Tse, Emily K.. ‘Cicero, Sigonio, and Burrows: investigating the authenticity of the Consolatio’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 14 (1999), 375–400Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W.‘Master W. H., R. I. P.’, Papers of the Modern Language Association of America 102 (1987), 42–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, Donald W. Elegy by W.S.: A Study in Attribution (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1989)

Foster, Donald W. ‘Primary culprit: an analysis of a novel of politics’, New York, 26 Feb. 1996, 50–7

Foster, Donald W. ‘Response to Elliott and Valenza, “And then there were none”’, Computers and the Humanities 30 (1996), 247–55CrossRef

Foster, Donald W. ‘A funeral elegy: W[illiam] S[hakespeare]'s “best-speakingwitnesses”’, Shakespeare Studies 25 (1997), 115–40

Foster, Donald W. ‘The Claremont Shakespeare authorship clinic: how severe are the problems?’, Computers and the Humanities 32 (1998), 491–510

Foster, Donald W. Author Unknown: Tales of Literary Detection (New York: Henry Holt, 2000)

Foucault, Michel. ‘What is an author?’ (1969), trans. Joseph V. Harari, in David Lodge, ed. Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader (London: Longman, 1988), pp. 197–210

Fox, Adam. ‘Ballads, libels and popular ridicule in Jacobean England’, Past and Present 145 (1994), 47–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Fuegi, John. The Life and Lies of Bertolt Brecht (London: Harper Collins, 1994)

Furbank, P. N. and W. R. Owens. The Canonisation of Daniel Defoe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988)

Furbank, P. N. and W. R. Owens ‘Dangerous relations’, The Scriblerian and the Kit-Kats 33 (1991), 242–4

Gaskell, Philip. From Writer to Reader: Studies in Editorial Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978)

Gellius, Aulus. The Attic Nights of Aulus Gellius, with an English translation by John C. Rolfe(London: Heinemann, 1954)

Gibson, Ian. The Erotomaniac (London: Faber, 2001)

Grafton, Anthony. Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship (Princeton University Press, 1990)

Greer, Germaine. Slip-shod Sibyls: Recognition, Rejection and the Woman Poet (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995)

Greetham, David. Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (New York: Garland, 1992)

Greetham, David ‘Textual forensics’, Papers of the Modern Language Association of America 111 (1996), 32–51CrossRef

Grenville, Kate and Sue Woolfe. Making Stories: How Ten Australian Novels Were Written (North Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1993)

Groves, Peter. Strange Music: The Metre of the English Heroic Line (Victoria, B. C.: English Literary Studies, 1998)

Halkett, Samuel and John Laing. A Dictionary of the Anonymous and Pseudonymous Literature of Great Britain (Edinburgh, 1882–3); later as Dictionary of Anonymous and Pseudonymous English Literature, new and enlarged edition by James Kennedy, W. A. Smith and A. F. Johnson, 9 vols. (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1926)

Harbage, Alfred. ‘Elizabethan-Restoration palimpsest’, Modern Language Review 35 (1940), 287–319CrossRef Google Scholar

Hardouin, Jean. Ad censuram scriptorum veterum prolegomena (London, 1766)

Hardouin, Jean Doutes proposé sur l’âge du Dante par P. H. J. (Père Hardouin, Jésuite) avec notes par C. L. (Paris, 1847)

Hargevik, Stieg. The Disputed Assignment of Memoirs of an English Officer to Daniel Defoe, 2 vols. (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1974)

Hiatt, Mary. The Way Women Write (New York: Teachers College Press, 1977)

Hillebrand, Harold N.‘Thomas Middleton's The Viper's Brood’, Modern Language Notes 42 (1927), 35–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Hilton, Michael L. and Holmes, David I.. ‘An assessment of cumulative sum charts for authorship attribution’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (1993), 73–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Hobart, Michael E. and Zachary S. Schiffman. Information Ages: Literacy, Numeracyand the Computer Revolution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998)

Holford-Strevens, Leofranc. Aulus Gellius (London: Duckworth, 1988)

Holmes, David I.‘The analysis of literary style: a review’, The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 148(4) (1985), 328–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Holmes, David I. ‘Authorship attribution’, Computers and the Humanities 28 (1994), 87–106CrossRef

Holmes, David I. ‘The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 13 (1998), 111–17CrossRef

Holmes, David I. and Forsyth, R. S.. ‘The Federalist revisited: new directions in authorship attribution’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 10 (1995), 111–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Holmes, David I. and Tweedie, F. J.. ‘Forensic stylometry: a review of the cusum controversy’, Revue informatique et statistique dans les sciences humaines 31 (1995), 19–47Google Scholar

Hoorn, Johan F. et al. ‘Neural network identification of poets using letter sequences’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 14 (1999), 311–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Hopkins, Lisa. ‘“Elegy by W. S.”: another possible candidate?’, Philological Quarterly 76 (1997), 159–68Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus. ‘The shares of Fletcher and his collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher canon (Ⅰ)’, Studies in Bibliography 8 (1956), 129–46; (Ⅱ) 9 (1959), 143–62; (Ⅲ) 11 (1958), 85–106; (Ⅳ) 12 (1959), 91–116; (Ⅴ) 13 (1960), 77–108; (Ⅵ) 14 (1961), 45–67; (Ⅶ) 15 (1962), 71–90

Hume, Robert D. Reconstructing Contexts: The Aims and Principles of Archaeo-Historicism (Oxford University Press, 1999)

Irizarry, Estelle. ‘A computer-assisted investigation of gender-related idiolect in Octavio Paz and Rosario Castellanos’, Computers and the Humanities 26 (1992), 103–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacklin, Carol Nagy, ed. The Psychology of Gender, 4 vols. (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1992)

Jerome. Select Letters, trans. F. A. Wright (London: Heinemann, 1933)

Johnson, J. W.‘Did Lord Rochester write Sodom?’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 81 (1987), 119–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. The Linguistic Individual: Self-Expression in Language and Linguistics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)

Keeble N. H. The Literary Culture of Nonconformity in Later Seventeenth-century England(Leicester University Press, 1987)

Kenny, Anthony J. The Computation of Style: An Introduction to Statistics for Students of Literature and Humanities (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982)

Kenny, Anthony J. A Stylometric Study of the New Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986)

Kewes, Paulina. Authorship and Appropriation: Writing for the Stage in England1660–1710 (Oxford University Press, 1998)

Kjell, Bradley. ‘Authorship determination using letter pair frequency features with neural network classifiers’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 9 (1994), 119–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Laan, Nancy. ‘Stylometry and method. The case of Euripides’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 10 (1995), 271–8CrossRef Google Scholar

Lake, David. The Canon of Thomas Middleton's Plays: Internal Evidence for the Major Problems of Authorship (London: Cambridge University Press, 1975)

Lakoff, Robin. Language and Woman's Place (New York: Harper & Row, 1975)

Lancashire, Ian. ‘Empirically determining Shakespeare's idiolect’, Shakespeare Studies 25 (1997), 171–85Google Scholar

Lancashire, Ian ‘Paradigms of authorship’, Shakespeare Studies 26 (1998), 296–301

Langbaine, Gerard. Momus triumphans, or, the plagiaries of the English stage: expos'd in a catalogue of all the comedies, tragi-comedies, masques, tragedies, opera's, pastorals, interludes, &c. both ancient and modern, that were ever yet printed in English …(London, 1687); as An Account of the English Dramatic Poets (1691)

Ledger, Gerard. ‘An exploration of differences in the Pauline epistles using multivariate statistical analysis’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 10 (1995), 85–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Ledger, Gerard and Merriam, Thomas. ‘Shakespeare, Fletcher, and the two noble kinsmen’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 9 (1994), 235–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Leed, Jacob. The Computer and Literary Style (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1996)

Lonsdale, Roger, ed. The Poems of Thomas Gray, William Collins, Oliver Goldsmith(London: Longmans, 1969)

Love, Harold. The Golden Age of Australian Opera: W. S. Lyster and his Companies1861–1880 (Sydney: Currency Press, 1981)

Love, Harold James Edward Neild: Victorian Virtuoso (Carlton, Vic.: Melbourne University Press, 1989)

Love, Harold ‘Scribal texts and literary communities: the Rochester circle and Osborn b. 105’, Studies in Bibliography 42 (1989), 219–35

Love, Harold ‘A Restoration lampoon in transmission and revision: Rochester's(?) “Signior Dildoe”’, Studies in Bibliography 46 (1993), 250–62

Love, Harold ‘But did Rochester really write Sodom?’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 87 (1993), 319–36CrossRef

Love, Harold Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-century England (Oxford University Press, 1993); reprinted as The Culture and Commerce of Texts: Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-century England (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1998)

Love, Harold ‘How personal is a Personal Miscellany? Sarah Cowper, Martin Clifford and the “Buckingham Commonplace Book”’, in R. C. Alston, ed. Order and Connexion: Studies in Bibliography and Book History (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1997), pp. 111–26

McAleer, Joseph. Popular Reading and Publishing in Britain 1914–1950(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992)

McAleer, Joseph Passion's Fortune: The Story of Mills and Boon (Oxford University Press, 1999)

McColly, William and Weier, Dennis. ‘Literary attribution and likelihood-ratio tests: the case of the Middle English Pearl-poems’, Computers and the Humanities 17 (1983), 65–75CrossRef Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F.‘Printers of the mind: some notes on bibliographical theories and printing-house practices’, Studies in Bibliography 22 (1969), 1–75Google Scholar

McManaway, James G.‘Latin title-page mottoes as a clue to dramatic authorship’, The Library, 4th ser. 26 (1946), 28–36Google Scholar

McMenamin, Gerald R. Forensic Stylistics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1993); also as Forensic Science International 58 (1993)

Marcus, Leah H. ‘From oral delivery to print’, in Arthur F. Marotti and Michael D. Bristol, eds. Print, Manuscript and Performance: The Changing Relations of the Media in Early England (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2000), pp. 33–48

Marotti, Arthur F. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995)

Mason, H. A. Editing Wyatt: An Examination of Collected Poems of Sir Thomas Wyatttogether with Suggestions for an Improved Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge Quarterly (Publications), 1972)

Mendenhall, Thomas. ‘The characteristic curves of composition’, Science 214 (1887), 237–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Mendenhall, Thomas ‘A mechanical solution of a literary problem’, Popular Science Monthly 60 (1901), 97–105

Merriam, Thomas. ‘An investigation of Morton's method: a reply’, Computers and the Humanities 21 (1987), 57–8Google Scholar

Merriam, Thomas ‘Neural computation in stylometry Ⅰ: an application to the works of Shakespeare and Fletcher’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (1993), 203–9CrossRef

Merriam, Thomas ‘Letter frequency as a discriminator of authors’, Notes and Queries 239 (1994), 467–9

Merriam, Thomas ‘Invalidation reappraised’, Computers and the Humanities 30 (1997), 417–31CrossRef

Merriam, Thomas ‘Heterogeneous authorship in early Shakespeare and the problem of Henry Ⅴ’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 13 (1998), 15–28CrossRef

Merriam, Thomas and Matthews, Robert A. J.. ‘Neural computation in stylometry Ⅱ: an application to the works of Shakespeare and Marlowe’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 9 (1994), 1–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)

Mews, Constant. The Lost Love Letters of Heloise and Abelard: Perceptions of Dialoguein Twelfth-century France (New York: St Martin's Press, 1999)

Michell, John. Who Wrote Shakespeare? (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996)

Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D.. ‘Attribution problems in English drama 1660–1700’, Harvard Library Bulletin 31 (1983), 5–39Google Scholar

Milnes, Tim. ‘On the authorship of Two Dissertations concerning Sense and the Imagination, with an Essay on Consciousness’, Notes and Queries 247 (2000), 196–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Minnis, A. J. Mediaeval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages, 2nd edn (Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1988)

Molloy, Frank. ‘Attribution and pseudonyms: the case of Victor J. Daley’, Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 24 (2000), 116–28Google Scholar

Morize, André. Problems and Methods of Literary History with Special Referenceto Modern French Literature: A Guide for Graduate Students (Boston: Ginn & Company, 1922)

Morton, Andrew Q. Literary Detection: How to Prove Authorship and Fraud in Literature and Documents (New York: Scribner, 1978)

Morton, Andrew Q. ‘Authorship: the nature of the habit’, Times Literary Supplement, 17–23 Feb. 1989, 164, 174

Mosteller, Frederick and David L. Wallace. Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1964); 2nd edition as Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference: The Case of the ‘Federalist’ Papers (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984)

Murray, Peter B. A Study of Cyril Tourneur (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964)

North, Roger. The Life of the Lord Keeper North, ed. Mary Chan (Lewiston, NY: Edward Mellen Press, 1995)

O'Brian, D. P. and A. C. Darnell. Authorship Puzzles in the History of Economics: A Statistical Approach(London: Macmillan, 1982)

O'Donnell, Mary Ann. ‘A verse miscellany of Aphra Behn: Bodleian Library MS Firth c. 16’, English Manuscript Studies 2 (1990), 189–227Google Scholar

Oliphant, E. H. C.‘The authorship of The Revenger's Tragedy’, Studies in Philology 23 (1926), 157–68Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J. Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981)

Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (London: Methuen, 1982)

Oppenheim, Helen. ‘The author of The Hibernian Father: an early colonial playwright’, Australian Literary Studies 2 (1966), 278–88Google Scholar

Orwell, George. ‘Boys’ weeklies’, Horizon 1 (1940), 353–4Google Scholar

Orwell, George The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, ed. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus, 4 vols. (London: Secker and Warburg, 1968)

Owens, W. R. and P. N. Furbank. A Critical Bibliography of Daniel Defoe (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1998)

Partridge, A. C. Orthography in Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama (London: Edward Arnold, 1964)

Pearsall, Derek. ‘Middle English romance and its audiences’, in Mary-Jo Arn and Hannecke Wirtjes, with Hans Jansen, Historicaland Editorial Studies in Medieval and Early Modern English (Groningen: Walters-Noordhoff, 1985), pp. 37–47

Pearson, David. Provenance Research in Book History: A Handbook (Repr. London: The British Library, 1998)

Pearson, Jacqueline. The Prostituted Muse: Images of Women and Women Dramatists1642–1737 (Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf, 1988)

Petronius. Titi Petronii Arbitri equitis Romani Satyricon cum fragmentis AlbæGræcæ recupertatis ann. 1688 nunc demum integrum (Rotterdam, 1693)

Petti, Anthony G. English Literary Hands from Chaucer to Dryden (London: Edward Arnold, 1977)

Pfeiffer, Rudolf. History of Classical Scholarship, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968, 1976)

Pierce, Frederick Erastus. The Collaboration of Webster and Dekker (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1909)

Pinkus, Philip. Grub Street Stripped Bare; the Scandalous Lives and Pornographic Works of the Original Grub St Writers (London: Constable, 1968)

Poulet, George. ‘Criticism and the experience of interiority’, in Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato, eds., The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), pp. 56–88

Price, George R.‘The authorship and the manuscript of The Old Law’, Huntington Library Quarterly 16 (1952–3), 117–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Reed, Joseph W. Literary Revision: The Inexact Science of Getting it Right (New Haven: Beinecke Library, 1990)

Rendell, Kenneth W. Forging History: The Detection of Fake Letters and Documents(Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1994)

Reynolds, L. H., ed. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)

Rochester. The Works of John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, ed. Harold Love (Oxford University Press, 1999)

Rose, Mark. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)

Rothman, Irving N.‘Defoe de-attributions scrutinized under Hargevik criteria: applying stylometrics to thecanon’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 94 (2000), 375–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Rouse, Richard H. and Rouse, Mary A.. ‘Wax tablets’, Language and Communication 9 (1989), 175–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Rudler, Gustave. Les Techniques de la critique et de l'histoire littéraires enlittérature française moderne (Oxford University Press, 1923)

Rudman, Joseph. ‘The state of authorship attribution studies: some problems and solutions’, Computers and the Humanities 31 (1997–8), 351–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Rudman, Joseph ‘Non-traditional authorship attribution studies in the Historia Augusta: some caveats’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 13 (1998), 151–7CrossRef

Rudman, Joseph ‘Non-traditional authorship attribution studies: ignis fatuus or Rosetta stone?’, Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 24 (2000), 163–76

Said, Edward. The World, the Text, and the Critic (New York: Vintage, 1991)

Sams, Eric. ‘Edmund Ironside and “stylometry”’, Notes and Queries 239 (1994), 469–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Sams, Eric, ed. Shakespeare's Edward Ⅲ: An Early Play Restored to the Canon (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996)

Sapir, Edward. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality, ed. David C. Mandelbaum (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1958)

Schoenbaum, Samuel. Internal Evidence and Elizabethan Dramatic Authorship: An Essay in Literary History and Method (London: Edward Arnold, 1966) [with valuable bibliography, pp. 231–56]

Schoenbaum, Samuel ‘Internal evidence and the attribution of Elizabethan plays’, in David V. Erdman and Ephim G. Fogel, eds., Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), pp. 188–203

Settle, Elkanah. Notes and Observations on the Empress of Morocco Revised (London, 1674)

Shakespeare. William Shakespeare: a Textual Companion, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor et al. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)

Sharpe, Kevin. Reading Revolutions: The Politics of Reading in Early Modern England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000)

Shaywitz, Bennett A., Shaywitz, Sally E. et al. ‘Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language’, Nature 373 (16 Feb. 1995), 607–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Sherbo, Arthur. ‘The uses and abuses of internal evidence’, in David V. Erdman and Ephim G. Fogel, eds., Evidence for Authorship: Essays on Problems of Attribution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966), pp. 6–24

Simon, Richard. Histoire critique du vieux testament (Paris, 1678)

Smith, Kate A. Introduction to Neural Networks and Data Mining for Business Applications (Melbourne: Eruditions, 1999)

Smith, M. W. A.‘An investigation of Morton's method to distinguish Elizabethan playwrights’, Computers and the Humanities 19 (1985), 3–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, M. W. A. ‘An investigation of the basis of Morton's method for the determination of authorship’, Style 19 (1985), 341–59

Smith, M. W. A. ‘Merriam's applications of Morton's method’, Computers and the Humanities 21 (1987), 59–60CrossRef

Smith, M. W. A. ‘The Revenger's Tragedy: the derivation and interpretation of statisticalresults for resolving disputed authorship’, Computers and the Humanities 21 (1987), 21–55CrossRef

Smith, M. W. A. ‘A procedure to determine authorship using pairs of consecutive words: more evidence for Wilkins's participation in Pericles’, Computers and the Humanities 23 (1989), 113–29CrossRef

Smith, M. W. A. ‘Attribution by statistics: a critique of four recent studies’, Revue informatique et statistique dans les sciences humaines 26 (1990), 233–50

Smith, M. W. A. ‘The authorship of The Revenger's Tragedy’, Notes and Queries 236 (1991), 508–13

Smith, M. W. A. ‘The authorship of Timon of Athens’, Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 5 (1991), 195–240

Spedding, Patrick. ‘Eliza Haywood's last (“lost”) work: The History of Miss Leonora Meadowson (1788)’, Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 23 (1999), 131–47Google Scholar

Spennemann, Dirk H. R. and Downing, Jane. ‘Literary detection: discovering the identity of a “Master mariner”’, Margin 47 (April 1999), 8–13Google Scholar

Spennemann, Dirk H. R. and Jane Downing ‘Unmasking transient colonial authors: the case of Handley Bathurst Sterndale’, Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand Bulletin 23 (1999), 148–63

Spinoza, Benedictus de. Tractatus Theologico-politicus, trans. Samuel Shirley(Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1991)

Stainer, C. L. Jonson and Drummond their Conversations: A few Remarks on an 18th Century Forgery (Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Stratford-upon-Avon: Shakespeare Head Press, 1925)

Stein, Harold. ‘A note on the versification of Childe Harold’, Modern Language Notes 42 (1927), 34–5CrossRef Google Scholar

Stillinger, Jack. ‘Multiple authorship and the question of authority’, Text 5 (1991), 285–93Google Scholar

Sutton-Smith, Brian. The Folkstories of Children (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981)

Tarlinskaja, Marina. Shakespeare's Verse: Iambic Pentameter and the Poet's Idiosyncrasies (New York: Peter Lang, 1987)

Taylor, Gary. ‘The rhetoric of textual criticism’, Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship 4 (1988), 39–57Google Scholar

Thompson, Roger. Unfit for Modest Ears: A Study of Pornographic, Obscene and Bawdy Works Written or Published in England in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1979)

Tooley, Sarah H.‘Some women novelists’, The Woman at Home 5 (1897–8), 161–211Google Scholar

Tweedie, Fiona J., Holmes, David I. and Corns, Thomas N.. ‘The provenance of De Doctrina Christiana, attributed to John Milton: a statistical investigation’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 13 (1998), 77–87CrossRef Google Scholar

TweedieFiona, J., Singh, S. and Holmes, D. I.. ‘Neural network applications in stylometry: the Federalist Papers’, Computers and the Humanities 30 (1996), 1–10CrossRef Google Scholar

Valla, Lorenzo. The Treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine. Textand Translation into English, ed. and trans. Christopher B. Coleman (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1922)

Vieth, David M. Attribution in Restoration Poetry: A Study of Rochester's ‘Poems'of 1680, Yale Studies in English, 153 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963)

Wells, Stanley, Gary Taylor et al., eds. William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)

Wentersdorf, Karl. ‘Shakespearean chronology and the metrical tests’, in ed. W. Fischer and K. Wentersdorf, Shakespeare-Studien(Marburg: N. G. Elwert, 1951)

Whitehead, John. This Solemn Mockery: The Art of Literary Forgery (London: Arlington Books, 1973)

Williams, C. B. Style and Vocabulary: Numerical Studies (London: Griffin, 1970)

Williams, Franklin B. jr. ‘Renaissance names in masquerade’, Papers of the Modern Language Association of America 69 (1954), 314–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, Franklin B. jr. ‘An initiation into initials’, Studies in Bibliography 9 (1957), 163–78

Wood, Anthony. Athenae Oxonienses: An Exact History of all the Writers and Bishops who have had their Education in the Famous University of Oxford, 2 vols. (London: Tho: Bennet, 1691–2)

Woudhuysen, Henry. Sir Philip Sidney and the Circulation of Manuscripts 1558–1640(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)

Yule, G. Udny. The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary (Cambridge University Press, 1944)