Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Photographs of the conference
- Introduction: Conceptual issues in quantum field theory
- Part One Philosophers' interest in quantum field theory
- Part Two Three approaches to the foundations of quantum field theory
- 3 The usefulness of a general theory of quantized fields
- 4 Effective field theory in condensed matter physics
- 5 The triumph and limitations of quantum field theory
- 6 Comments
- Part Three
- Part Four Mathematics, statistics and quantum field theory
- Part Five Quantum field theory and space-time
- Part Six
- Part Seven Renormalization group
- Part Eight Non-Abelian gauge theory
- Part Nine The ontology of particles or fields
- Part Ten
- Name index
- Subject index
6 - Comments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Photographs of the conference
- Introduction: Conceptual issues in quantum field theory
- Part One Philosophers' interest in quantum field theory
- Part Two Three approaches to the foundations of quantum field theory
- 3 The usefulness of a general theory of quantized fields
- 4 Effective field theory in condensed matter physics
- 5 The triumph and limitations of quantum field theory
- 6 Comments
- Part Three
- Part Four Mathematics, statistics and quantum field theory
- Part Five Quantum field theory and space-time
- Part Six
- Part Seven Renormalization group
- Part Eight Non-Abelian gauge theory
- Part Nine The ontology of particles or fields
- Part Ten
- Name index
- Subject index
Summary
This commentator format is quite unfamiliar to me, and somewhat uncomfortable. I don't know whether I'm supposed to flatter the speakers, criticize them, grade them, or merely parrot them. Or should I go off on my own? This latter is tempting. If unleashed I could provide you with true answers to all the questions before us, philosophical, historical, physical, mathematical, physical-mathematical, and so on. But I'll bite my tongue and try to stick to the commentator role.
First, a few words on the topic of the opening session this afternoon - why are philosophers interested in quantum field theory? Quantum mechanics undoubtedly abounds in genuine, deep and still unresolved philosophical questions. These are usually posed, at least in popular accounts, in the context of finite systems of nonrelativistic point particles. In preparation for the conference, I asked myself: does relativistic QFT introduce any really distinctive philosophical problems? There are several possibilities, which I can only express in low-brow form. For one thing, a field is really a collection of infinitely many degrees of freedom, one for each point in space. I can well suppose that infinity raises interesting questions for philosophers. Certainly for physicists, especially in the field theory context, it has been a great preoccupation. As we'll hear later from Jackiw, infinity has its useful aspects. Next, for systems of relativistic particles in interaction, it is no longer so easily possible to speak of measurements of position and momentum of individual particles, except perhaps in asymptotic regions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory , pp. 68 - 73Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999