Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T06:29:43.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2023

Jonathan Reinarz
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

PRIOR TO 1779, very few of Birmingham's inhabitants entered hospitals in order to receive medical treatment. Indeed, hardly any of those living in the town had ever laid eyes on such a building. By the close of the 1930s, however, the city supported approximately two-dozen such medical institutions. Nationally, the number of voluntary hospitals approached 700. Combined, these institutions formed a net of medical philanthropy which conceivably caught ‘virtually everyone at one time or another’. From 1779, when the General Hospital first filled its forty beds, medical institutions, including the second medical school in provincial England, multiplied and expanded steadily. By 1939, the nine earliest voluntary hospitals had become affiliated teaching hospitals and offered the town's sick and infirm more than 1,700 beds. These were occupied by nearly 30,000 inpatients during that year alone. Unlike the late eighteenth century, when the General Hospital treated very few outpatients, these nine voluntary hospitals now offered medical care to more than 130,000 patients. With voluntary hospital provision what it was in 1780, it would have taken medical staff at Birmingham's only hospital sixty years to treat a number of individuals equivalent to the town's population. By 1939, Birmingham's first nine voluntary hospitals could theoretically have treated the city's million inhabitants in just seven and a half years. Significantly, these calculations do not include the town's largest medical institution, the Dudley Road Hospital, the former workhouse infirmary. When the Birmingham Regional Health Board was established on 10 December 1946, its nine committees managed 220 hospitals and 42,000 beds. With ever more women working, so the likelihood of patients remaining at home during illness also declined. Clearly, hospitals had become very familiar institutions to the inhabitants of Birmingham and its surrounding districts in less than two centuries. In turn, as ever greater numbers passed through Birmingham's teaching hospitals, medical practitioners and students became far more familiar with the afflictions of the wider community they served.

The institutions themselves changed significantly in the century following their first appearance. Resembling a large mansion when it first opened in 1779, the General Hospital, equally domestic in its organisation, was more often referred to as a ‘house’, than a hospital. Subsequent institutions appeared similarly residential, though often took much longer to organise inpatient accommodation, most operating as dispensaries for years, or even decades, as was the case at the Dental Hospital.

Type
Chapter
Information
Health Care in Birmingham
The Birmingham Teaching Hospitals, 1779-1939
, pp. 240 - 247
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Jonathan Reinarz, University of Birmingham
  • Book: Health Care in Birmingham
  • Online publication: 08 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846157332.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Jonathan Reinarz, University of Birmingham
  • Book: Health Care in Birmingham
  • Online publication: 08 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846157332.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Jonathan Reinarz, University of Birmingham
  • Book: Health Care in Birmingham
  • Online publication: 08 March 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846157332.013
Available formats
×