Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:41:18.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Canterbury Forgeries Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2023

Get access

Summary

In his Historia novorum, Eadmer narrates Canterbury's failure to assert primacy over York before the royal court in 1120. Immediately following this episode, he describes the discovery of important documents by the monks of Christ Church after a diligent search of ‘the hidden places of ancient cupboards and ancient Gospel books, which had been looked on only as ornaments in the house of God’. Eadmer then inserts copies of ten papal bulls into his history. As we now know, these documents were forgeries. But nonetheless they were presented before the papal curia in 1123 and, according to Hugh the Chanter of York, they were literally laughed out of court:

[S]ome of the Romans asked the Canterbury party whether the privileges had bulls attached. But they said that they had left the originals with their bulls in their church and brought copies with them. And because privileges and charters are not valid evidence unless they have bulls or seals attached, they were asked whether they would swear that they had originals in their possession with bulls. They retired, and consulting together said among themselves that they had no bulls … They made up their minds to come back and say that the bulls had either perished or were lost. When they said this, some smiled, others turned up their noses, and others laughed aloud, making fun of them and saying that it was a miracle that lead should perish or be lost and parchment survive.

This humiliating failure at the papal curia is the end of the story of the ‘Canterbury forgeries’ this article recounts; but where did it begin? Where did these forgeries come from?

In 1902, Heinrich Böhmer identified these ten papal bulls concerning the primacy of Canterbury as wholly or partially forged. Böhmer attributed them to the machinations of Archbishop Lanfranc, who he believed was asserting novel claims to primacy in the wake of the Norman Conquest.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Haskins Society Journal 18
2006. Studies in Medieval History
, pp. 36 - 50
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×