Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:54:06.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - ‘Real’ Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2022

Ann Oakley
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Our results confirm the findings of existing studies showing that the provision of ‘social’ care for pregnant women has the capacity to affect a range of pregnancy outcomes … The mean birthweight difference we found … suggests that our initial aim of increasing birthweight by 150 g was over-ambitious. (Oakley et al. 1990b: 160)

To do or not to do a test of significance – that is a question that divides men of good will and sound competence. (Winch and Campbell 1970: 199)

The location of the SSPO study at the margins of two different models of knowledge-production – one dealing with personal and social relations, the other with the quantification of the body in the discourse of the medical and physical sciences – had many implications for the way in which the study was done. The different methodologies embedded in these alternative models are usually described as quantitative and qualitative, and they are distinguished from each other in three main ways. First, with regard to the definition of data, quantitative research isolates and defines variables which constitute data, pre-specifying hypothetical relationships between variables before data collection takes place; the qualitative approach, on the other hand, is concerned with categories rather than variables, and these are expected to change their nature and definition as the research progresses. Secondly, the qualitative tradition obliges the researcher to pay some attention to the assumptions and values of those carrying out the research and collecting the data, as these are viewed as constituting part of the research data themselves; while the quantitative researcher labours in the belief that the world of personal values is separate from the world of scientific work. Thirdly, qualitative research mines the terrain while quantitative work maps it: quantitative research is geared towards the generalizability of research findings, and qualitative research to the exploration of the internal relations of, and links between, categories and processes.

In the SSPO study, these traditional methodological divisions could be summarized as follows:

Quantitative methods used:

  • 1. An experimental research design.

  • 2. Use of a table of random numbers to allocate subjects to intervention and control groups.

  • 3. Pre-specified hypotheses as to relations between key variables.

  • 4. Use of pre-coded structured research instruments.

  • 5. Quantification of data.

  • 6. Effectiveness of intervention assessed by means of pre-specified ‘hard’ outcomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social support and motherhood (reissue)
The Natural History of a Research Project
, pp. 293 - 336
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • ‘Real’ Results
  • Ann Oakley, University College London
  • Book: Social Support and Motherhood (Reissue)
  • Online publication: 14 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447349471.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • ‘Real’ Results
  • Ann Oakley, University College London
  • Book: Social Support and Motherhood (Reissue)
  • Online publication: 14 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447349471.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • ‘Real’ Results
  • Ann Oakley, University College London
  • Book: Social Support and Motherhood (Reissue)
  • Online publication: 14 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447349471.012
Available formats
×