Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T19:07:33.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - The West as Progenitor and Modifier of Concepts of Free Expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2017

Monroe Price
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Nicole Stremlau
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Speech and Society in Turbulent Times
Freedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective
, pp. 169 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Baker, C. E. 1989. Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barendt, E. 2007. Freedom of Speech. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1789. “Draught of a new plan for the organisation of judicial establishment in France,” in Bowring, J. (ed.) 1843, The Works of Jeremy Bentham with an Outline of His Opinions on the Principal Subjects Discussed in His Works, Vol. 4. Edinburgh: W. Tait, pp. 285406.Google Scholar
Blasi, V. 1977. “The checking value in First Amendment theory,” Law & Social Inquiry 2: 521649.Google Scholar
Bollinger, L. C. 2010. Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide Open: A Free Press for a New Century. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. 2007. Whistleblowing: Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandeis, L. D. 1914. Other People’s Money, and How the Bankers Use It. New York: Frederick A Stokes Company.Google Scholar
China.org.cn 2013. “Weibo: An eye on corruption,” March 11, 2013. Available at: www.china.org.cn/china/NPC_CPPCC_2013/2013-03/11/content_28201650.htm.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. 2013. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, W. H. 2008. “The Fifth Estate emerging through the network of networks,” Prometheus 27: 115.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1986. A Matter of Principle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hitchens, L. 2006. Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity: A Comparative Study of Policy and Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J. 2002. Open Justice: A Critique of the Public Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, D. 1975. “The speech and press clauses,” UCLA Law Review 23: 77119.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, J. 1990. “Foundations and limits of freedom of the press,” in Lichtenberg, J. (ed.),Democracy and the Mass Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–35.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, R. 2012. Consent of the Networked. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, A. 1961. “The First Amendment is an absolute,” Supreme Court Review 1961 1961: 245–66.Google Scholar
Milton, J. 1918. Areopagitica, with a Commentary by Sir Richard Jebb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nabi, Z. 2014. “Resistance censorship is futile,” First Monday 19: 11. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/5525/4155.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1991. “Free expression and personal identification,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11: 303–24.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 1972. “A theory of freedom of expression,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 204–26.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 1982. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 2005. “The exceptional First Amendment,” in Ignatieff, M. (ed.), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 2956.Google Scholar
Tacitus, 1876. Annals of Tacitus. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tong, J. 2011. Investigative Journalism in China: Journalism, Power, and Society. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Weisenhaus, D. 2007. Hong Kong Media Law. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Xinhua Agency 2013. “New media major outlet for exposing corruption,” June 25, 2013. Available at: http://en.people.cn/90882/8298919.html.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2000. “Watchdogs on party leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China,” Journalism Studies 1: 577–97.Google Scholar

References

Blackstone, W. 1771–2. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Philadelphia: Robert Bell.Google Scholar
Chafee, Z. 1919. “Freedom of speech in war time,” Harvard Law Review 32: 932–73.Google Scholar
Clinton, H. R. 2010. “Remarks on Internet Freedom,” speech delivered to Newseum, Washington, DC, January 21, 2010.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. I. 1963. “Toward a general theory of the First Amendment,” Yale Law Journal 72: 877956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L., Landes, W. M., and Posner, R. A. 2013. “How business fares in the Supreme Court,” Minnesota Law Review 97: 1431–73.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. M. 2008. Free Expression and Democracy in America: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. 1974. “Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change,” Law and Society Review 9: 95151.Google Scholar
Graber, M. A. 2002. “Constitutional politics and constitutional theory: A misunderstood and neglected relationship,” Law and Social Inquiry 27: 309–38.Google Scholar
Kurland, P. B. and Lerner, R. (eds.) 1987. The Founders’ Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levy, L. W. 1985. Emergence of a Free Press. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, P. 2010. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1956. On Liberty. New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. 1644. Areopagitica: A speech of Mr. John Milton for the liberty of unlicensed printing to the Parliament of England. Available at: www.constitution.org/milton/areopagitica.htm.Google Scholar
Sharp, J. R. 1993. American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Siebert, W. H. 1920. The Loyalists of Pennsylvania. Columbus: The University at Columbus.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. B. 1976. Holy Warriors: The Abolitionists and American Slavery. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Storing, H. J. 1981. What the Anti-Federalists Were For. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Van Tyne, C. H. 1902. The Loyalists in the American Revolution. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
White, G. E. 1996. “The First Amendment comes of age: The emergence of free speech in twentieth-century America,” Michigan Law Review 95: 299392.Google Scholar

References

Asmolov, G. (interviewed by G. Nejaskin) 2015. “Internet, kak i SShA, nachal vypolnjat’ rol’ vneshnego vraga (The internet, like the USA, has started to play the role of an external enemy),” Slon, August 12, 2015. Available at: https://slon.ru/posts/54906.Google Scholar
Baglay, M. 2004. Konstitucionnoe Pravo Rossijskoj Federacii (The Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation). Moscow: Norma.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. 2011. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baturin, Y. 2006. “Neokonchennaja istorija glasnosti (Unfinished story of glasnost),” in Zassoursky, Y. and Olga, Z. (eds.), Glasnost i zhurnalistika: 1985–2005. Moscow: Gorbachev-Fund, Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University, pp. 1429.Google Scholar
Bowring, B.1996. “Vstuplenie Rossii v Sovet Evropy i zashhita prav cheloveka: Vser’joz li vypolnjajutsja objazatel’stva?” (“Russia’s entry to the Council of Europe and the protection of human rights: Are obligations really being performed?”). Available at: www.hrights.ru/text/b10/Chapter5.htm.Google Scholar
Brown, A. 2007. Seven Years that Changed the World: Perestroika in Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Center for Global Communication Studies, University of Pennsylvania and Russian Public Opinion Research Center 2015. “Benchmarking public demand: Russia’s appetite for internet control.” Available at: www.global.asc.upenn.edu/publications/benchmarking-public-demand-russias-appetite-for-internet-control/.Google Scholar
Efimova, L. 2000. “Publichno-pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennogo regulirovanija televidenija i radioveshhanija v. Rossijskoj Federacii” (“Public-law foundations of the state regulation of TV and radio broadcasting in the Russian Federation”), (Kandidat nauk (Candidate of Science) dissertation, Presidential Academy of Public Administration, Moscow).Google Scholar
Eriomin, A. 2011. “Gosudarstvennaja politika Rossijskoj Federacii po formirovaniju otrasli SMI” (“State policy of the Russian Federation on the formation of the media industry”), (Kandidat nauk (Candidate of Science) dissertation, Moscow State University, Moscow).Google Scholar
Fedorov, V. 2010. “Svobody ne hvataet no cenzura nuzhna” (“There is a lack of freedom but censorship is needed”), VTSIOM. Available at: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=266&uid=13779.Google Scholar
Fedotov, M. 2001. “Rossijskoe Pravo Massovoj Informacii na Fone Obshheevropejskih Standartov: Kontrasty i Polutona” (“Russian Law on Mass Information against the Background of the Common-European Standards: Contrasts and Nuances”), Konstitucionnoe Pravo: Vostochnoevropejskoe Obozrenie (Constitutional Law: Eastern European Review), 3(36): 105–8.Google Scholar
Fedotov, M. 2002. Pravovye osnovy zhurnalistiki (Legal Basics of Journalism). Moscow: Vlados.Google Scholar
Foster, F. H. 2002. “Information and the problem of democracy: The Russian experience,” in Price, M., Richter, A., and Yu, P. K. (eds.), Russian Media Law and Policy in the Yeltsin Decade: Essays and Documents. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, Vol. 1, pp. 95118.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, M. (1987). O Perestrojke i Kadrovoj Politike Partii (On Perestroika and Personnel Policy of the Party). Report at the Plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, January 27. Available at: www.constitution20.ru/ckeditor_assets/attachments/50/1987_01_27_gorbachev_o_perestr_i_kadr.pdf.Google Scholar
Kachkaeva, A. 2006. “Transformacija Rossijskogo televidenija” (“The transformation of Russian television”), in Zassoursky, Y. (ed.), Sredstva massovoj informacii Rossii. Moscow: Aspect Press Ltd, pp. 298321.Google Scholar
Krug, P. 2008. “Press freedom in Russia: Does the constitution matter?,” in Smith, G. B. and Sharlet, R. S. (eds), Law in Eastern Europe. Volume 58: Russia and its Constitution: Promise and Political Reality. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, pp. 79103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenin, V. 1905. “Partijnaja organizacija i partijnaja literatura” (“The party’s organization and party’s literature”), in Lenin 1968, Vol. 12, pp. 99–105.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. 1918. “Pervonachal’nyj variant stat’i ocherednye zadachi Sovetskoj vlasti” (“The original version of the article ‘Immediate tasks of the Soviet power’”), in Lenin 1968, Vol. 36, pp. 127–64.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. 1921. “Pis’mo G. Mjasnikovu” (“The letter to G. Mjasnikov”), in Lenin 1968, Vol. 44, pp. 78–83.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. 1968. Polnoe Sobranie Sochinenij (Complete Works). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Politicheskoj Literatury. Available at: http://vkpb.ru/images/pdf/Lenin_pss/tom12.pdf.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1842. “Debaty o svobode pechati i ob opublikovanii protokolov Soslovnogo Sobranija” (“Debates on freedom of the press and publication of the proceedings of the Assembly of the Estates”), in Marx and Engels 1955, Vol. 1, pp. 30–84.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1843. “Opravdanie Mozel’skogo korrespondenta” (“Justification of Mozel’s correspondent”), in Marx and Engels 1955, Vol. 1, pp. 187–217.Google Scholar
McNair, B. 1991. Glasnost, Perestroika and the Soviet Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pastukhov, V. 2008. “Vtoroe dyhanie Russkogo konstitucionalizma” (“The second breath of Russian constitutionalism”), Sravnitelnoe Konstitucionnoe Obozrenije 2( 63): 410.Google Scholar
Price, M. 1995. “Law, force and the Russian media,” Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 13: 795846.Google Scholar
Richter, A. 1995. “The Russian press after perestroika,” Canadian Journal of Communication. Available at: http://cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/842/748.Google Scholar
Richter, A. 2007. “Svoboda massovoj informacii v Postsovetskih gosudarstvah: Regulirovanie i samoregulirovanie zhurnalistiki v uslovijah perehodnogo perioda” (“The freedom of mass information in the post-Soviet states: Regulation and self-regulation under conditions of transitionary period”), (doctoral dissertation, Moscow State University, Moscow).Google Scholar
Richter, A. 2011. “The post-Soviet media and communication policy landscape: The case of Russia,” in Mansell, R. and Raboy, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 192209.Google Scholar
Richter, A. 2012. “Freedom of mass information in the post-Soviet countries: Two models of regulation,” in Gross, P. and Jakubowicz, K. (eds.), Media Transformations in the Post-Communist World: Eastern Europe’s Tortured Path to Change. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp. 155232.Google Scholar
Richter, A. 2015. “Russia’s Supreme Court as media freedom protector,” in Molnar, P. (ed.), Free Speech and Censorship Around the Globe. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 273–98.Google Scholar
Zassoursky, Y. 2006. “Tendencii funkcionirovanija SMI v sovremennoj strukture Rossijskogo obshhestva” (“Trends in functioning of the mass media in the modern structure of Russian society”), in Zassoursky, Y. (ed.), Sredstva Massovoj Informacii Rossii. Moscow: Aspect Press Ltd, pp. 350.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×