Adams, J. N. 1977. The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (London: Duckworth).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. 1992. “Iteration of Compound Verb with Simplex in Latin Prose,” Eikasmos 3: 295–8.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. 1994. Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. 1995. “The Language of the Vindolanda Writing Tablets: An Interim Report,” JRS 85: 86–134.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. 2013. Social Variation and the Latin Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. 2016. An Anthology of Informal Latin, 200 bc–ad 900: Fifty Texts with Translations and Linguistic Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (eds) 1999. Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Allen, W. S. 1973. Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Allen, W. S. 1978. Vox Latina: The Pronunciation of Classical Latin, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. S. 1963. Pompey, his Friends, and the Literature of the First Century b.c. University of California Publications in Classical Philology 19 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. 1982. Essays in Roman Satire (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

André, J. 1961. L’alimentation et la cuisine à Rome (Paris: Klincksieck).Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. 1967. Scipio Aemilianus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Auhagen, U. 2001. “Lucilius und die Komödie,” in Manuwald 2001a: 9–23.Google Scholar

Axelson, B. 1945. Unpoetische Wörter (Lund: Gleerup).Google Scholar

Bader, F. 1962. La formation des composés nominaux du latin (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badian, E. 1958. Foreign Clientelae (164–70 b.c.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Bagordo, A. 2001. “Lucilius und Kallimachos,” in Manuwald 2001a: 24–36.Google Scholar

Baier, T. 2001. “Lucilius und die grieschischen Wörter,” in Manuwald 2001a: 37–50.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. 1947. Lucretius De rerum natura, 3 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Bakkum, G. C. L. M. 2009. The Latin Dialect of the Ager Faliscus: 150 Years of Scholarship (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).Google Scholar

Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds) 2009. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1996. “Poetry, Praise, and Patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes,” ClAnt 15: 5–47.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. and Cucchiarelli, A. 2005. “Satire and the Poet: The Body as Self-Referential Symbol,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 207–23.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, M. 1962. Nevio epico (Padua: CEDAM).Google Scholar

Bardon, H. 1957. “Catulle et ses modèles poétiques de langue latine,” Latomus 16: 614–27.Google Scholar

Battré, C. 1909. De recompositionis in verbis Latinis adhibitae usu et notione. Diss. Jena.Google Scholar

Behaghel, O. 1909. “Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern,” IF 25: 110–42.Google Scholar

Benedetto, G. 1997. “Il trattamento dei frammenti nell’edizione callimachea del 1761 attraverso la corrispondenza inedita di J. A. Ernesti con D. Ruhnkenius e L. C. Valckenaer (1748–1761),” in Most 1997: 95–110.Google Scholar

Berger, A. L., Della Pietra, S. A., and Della Pietra, V. J. 1996. “A Maximum Entropy Approach to Natural Language Processing,” Computational Linguistics 22: 39–71.Google Scholar

Bernardi Perini, G. 1983. “Le ‘riforme’ ortografiche latine di età repubblicana,” AION(ling) 5: 141–69.Google Scholar

Bertini, F. 1967. “Errori nella tradizione manoscritta della ‘Compendiosa doctrina’,” Studi Noniani 1: 8–66.Google Scholar

Bertocchi, A., Maraldi, M., and Orlandini, A. 2010. “Quantification,” in Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Vol. 3: Constituent Syntax: Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora (Berlin: De Gruyter), 19–173.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 1979. Studi e note su Ennio (Pisa: Giardini).Google Scholar

Bo, D. 1960. De Horati poetico eloquio: Indices nominum propriorum, metricarum rerum prosodiacarum grammaticarumque (Turin: Paravia).Google Scholar

Bogel, F. V. 2001. The Difference Satire Makes: Rhetoric and Reading from Johnson to Byron (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Bolaño, R. 2010. “Literature + Illness = Illness,” in The Insufferable Gaucho, trans. C. Andrews (New York: New Directions), 123–44.Google Scholar

Bolelli, T. 1968. “Lat. muricidus (Plaut. Epid. 333),” in Studi linguistici in onore di V. Pisani (Brescia: Paideia), 125–8.Google Scholar

Bortone Poli, A. 1979. Aspetti della tecnica esametrica di Lucilio (Lecce: Editrice Salentina).Google Scholar

Bourdin, S. 2012. Les peuples de l’Italie préromaine (Rome: École Française de Rome).Google Scholar

Braund, S. 1988. Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal’s Third Book of Satires (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Braund, S. 1996. Juvenal: Satires Book I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Braund, S. 1997. “A Passion Unconsoled? Grief and Anger in Juvenal Satire 13,” in Braund and Gill 1997: 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, S. and Gill, C. (eds) 1997. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breed, B. W. and Rossi, A. (eds) 2006. Ennius and the Invention of Roman Epic = Arethusa 39: 397–611.Google Scholar

Breyer, G. 1993. Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches (Leuven: Peeters).Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. 2005. “The Language and Style of the Fragmentary Republican Historians,” in Reinhardt, Lapidge, and Adams 2005: 53–72.Google Scholar

Brøndal, V. 1937. “Omnis et totus: analyse et étymologie,” in Hendriksen, H. (ed.), Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Holger Pedersen (Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard), 261–7.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. 1971. Italian Manpower 225 b.c.–a.d. 14 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. 1980. “On Historical Fragments and Epitomes,” CQ 30: 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bücheler, F. 1886. “Zu Lucilius und zur altlateinischen Prosodie,” Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik mit Einschluss des älteren Mittellateins 3: 144–6.Google Scholar

Butterfield, D. 2008. “The Poetic Treatment of atque from Catullus to Juvenal,” Mnemosyne 61: 386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campanile, E. 1981a. “La collana dei Celti,” in Campanile 1981b: 91–9.Google Scholar

Campanile, E. 1981b. Studi di cultura celtica e indoeuropea (Pisa: Giardini).Google Scholar

Carney, T. F. 1970. A Biography of Gaius Marius (Chicago: Argonaut & Co.).Google Scholar

Caston, R. R. 1997. “The Fall of the Curtain (Horace S. 2.8),” TAPhA 127: 233–56.Google Scholar

Caston, R. R. 2016. “Terence and Satire,” in Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J., and Manuwald, G. (eds), Roman Drama and Its Contexts (Berlin: De Gruyter), 435–52.Google Scholar

Cavarzere, A. 2001. “Ego Polivi Versibus Senariis: Phaedrus and Iambic Poetry,” in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., and Barchiesi, A. (eds), Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 205–17.Google Scholar

Chahoud, A. 1998. C. Lucilii reliquiarum concordantiae (Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann).Google Scholar

Chahoud, A. 2004. “The Roman Satirist Speaks Greek,” Classics Ireland 11: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chahoud, A. 2007a. “Alternità linguistica, latinitas e ideologia tra Lucilio e Cicerone,” in Oniga, R. and Vatteroni, S. (eds), Plurilinguismo letterario (Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino), 39–56.Google Scholar

Chahoud, A. 2007b. “Antiquity and Authority in Nonius Marcellus,” in Scourfield, J. H. D. (ed.), Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity: Inheritance, Authority, and Change (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chahoud, A. 2010. “Romani veteres atque urbani sales: A Note on Cicero De Oratore 2.262 and Lucilius 173M,” in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chahoud, A. 2011. “The Language of Latin Verse Satire,” in Clackson 2011: 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charpin, F. 1978–91. Lucilius Satires, 3 vols. (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Christenson, D. 2008. Plautus: Casina, Amphitryon, Captivi, Pseudolus (Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing).Google Scholar

Christes, J. 1971. Der frühe Lucilius: Rekonstruktion und Interpretation des XXVI. Buches sowie von Teilen des XXX. Buches (Heidelberg: C. Winter).Google Scholar

Christes, J. 1986. “Lucilius,” in Adamietz, J. (ed.), Die römische Satire (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 57–122.Google Scholar

Christes, J. 1998. “Lucilius senex – vetus historia – Epilog zu XXVI–XXX: Drei alte Fragen neu verhandelt,” Philologus 142: 71–9.Google Scholar

Christes, J. and Garbugino, G. 2015. Lucilius: Satiren (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Cichorius, C. 1908. Untersuchungen zur Lucilius (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Citroni, M. 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica (Rome: Laterza).Google Scholar

Clackson, J. (ed.) 2011. A Companion to the Latin Language (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clackson, J. 2011. “The Social Dialects of Latin,” in Clackson 2011: 505–26.Google Scholar

Clackson, J. 2015. Language and Society in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G. 2007. The Blackwell History of the Latin Language (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. 1996. “Grundlagen und Absicht der Kritik des Lucilius,” in Klodt 1996: 11–28.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. 1981. “Le leggi sul lusso e la società romana tra III e II secolo a.C.,” in Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds), Società Romana e Produzione Schiavistica. Vol. 3: Modelli etici, diritto e trasformazione sociale (Rome: Laterza), 1–14.Google Scholar

Clemente, G. 1985. “Lucilio e la società romana,” Index 13: 47–62.Google Scholar

Cloud, J. D. 1989. “Satirists and the Law,” in Braund, S. (ed.), Satire and Society in Ancient Rome (Exeter: University of Exeter Press), 49–67.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. 1982. “L’ ‘agora’ des Italiens a Delo: il mercato degli schiavi?” in Delo e l’Italia, Opuscula Instituti Romani Finlandiae 2 (Rome: Bardi), 119–48.Google Scholar

Coffey, M. 1976. Roman Satire (London: Methuen).Google Scholar

Coleman, R. 1972. “Verse Scansion and the Analysis of Latin Hexameter Rhythm,” Didaskalos 4: 192–205.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. 1989. “The Rise and Fall of Absolute Constructions: A Latin Case History,” in Calboli, G. (ed.), Subordination and Other Topics in Latin (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 353–74.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. 1998. “Accent and Quantity in Latin Versification: Continuities and Discontinuities,” in García-Hernández, B. (ed.), Estudios de lingüística latina: Actas del IX Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Latina, vol. 2 (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas), 1087–1100.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. 1999. “Poetic Diction, Poetic Discourse and the Poetic Register,” in Adams and Mayer 1999: 21–93.Google Scholar

Collard, C. and Cropp, M. 2008. Euripides. Vol. 7: Fragments: Aegeus – Meleager (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Connors, C. 1998. Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Connors, C. 2005. “Epic Allusion in Roman Satire,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 123–45.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. 2009. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation, and Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Corbett, P. 1986. The Scurra (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Corbier, M. 1999. “The Broad Bean and the Moray: Social Hierarchies and Food in Rome,” in Flandrin, J.-L. and Montanari, M. (eds), Foods: A Culinary History from Antiquity to the Present (New York: Columbia University Press), 128–40.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (ed.) 2013. The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1980. A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal (London: Athlone Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1999. Archaic Latin Prose (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar

Cozzoli, A.-T. 1995. “Poesia satirica latina e favola esopica (Ennio, Lucilio, e Orazio),” RCCM 37: 187–204.Google Scholar

Craig, C. 2004. “Audience Expectations, Invective and Proof,” in Powell, J. and Paterson, J. (eds), Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 187–213.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra epodi e sermones (Pisa: Giardini).Google Scholar

Cunningham, M. P. 1957. “Some Phonetic Aspects of Word-Order Patterns in Latin,” PAPhS 101: 481–505.Google Scholar

Cupaiuolo, F. 1985. “Esametro,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana), vol. 2, 375–9.Google Scholar

Dalby, A. 2003. Food in the Ancient World from A to Z (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Damon, C. 1997. The Mask of the Parasite: A Pathology of Roman Patronage (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Dauster, M. 2003. “Roman Republican Sumptuary Legislation: 182–102,” Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11: 65–93.Google Scholar

David, J.-M. 2003. “Le prix de la voix: remarques sur la clause d’exclusion des praecones de la table d’Héraclée,” in Hantos, T. (ed.), Laurea internationalis: Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 81–106.Google Scholar

De Ligt, L. 2002. “Restraining the Rich, Protecting the Poor: Symbolic Aspects of Roman Legislation,” in Jongman, W. and Kleijwegt, M. (eds), After the Past: Essays in Ancient History in Honour of H. W. Pleket (Leiden: Brill), 1–45.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. 2007. The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Melo, W. 2010. “Possessive Pronouns in Plautus,” in Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds), Colloquial and Literary Latin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Melo, W. 2013. Plautus. Vol. 5: Stichus, Trinummus, Truculentus, Vidularia, Fragments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Simone, C. and Marchesini, S. 2002. Monumenta Linguae Messapicae, 2 vols. (Wiesbaden: Reichert).Google Scholar

Déry, C. A. 1998. “Fish as Food and Symbol in Ancient Rome,” in Walker, H. (ed.), Fish: Food from the Waters (Totnes: Prospect Books), 94–115.Google Scholar

Devine, A. M. and Stephens, L. D. 2006. Latin Word Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devoto, G. 1940. Storia della lingua di Roma (Bologna: Cappelli).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. 2002. Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. 1997. “On Fragments in Classical Scholarship,” in Most 1997: 1–33.Google Scholar

Donahue, J. F. 2004. The Roman Community at Table during the Principate (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Dubois, C. 1933. La métrique de Lucrèce comparée à celle de ses prédécesseurs Ennius et Lucilius (Strasbourg: Librairie Universitaire d’Alsace).Google Scholar

Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A. J. 2012. “Epilogue,” in Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, A. J. (eds), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 255–72.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. 1961. The Political Thought of Sallust (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Elliott, J. 2013. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erdkamp, P. 2005. The Grain Market in the Roman Empire: A Social, Political and Economic Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. 1957. “Farfarus et Marmar,” in Philologica, vol. 2 (Paris: Klincksieck), 209–15.Google Scholar

Facchini Tosi, C. 1983. La ripetizione lessicale nei poeti latini (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar

Faller, S. 2001. “Lucilius und die Reise nach Sizilien,” in Manuwald 2001a: 72–89.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. 2007. “Horace’s Body, Horace’s Books,” in Heyworth, S. J. (ed.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 174–93.Google Scholar

Fay, E. 1912. “Lucilius on i and ei,” AJPh 33: 311–16.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 2005. “The Beginnings of a Literature in Latin,” JRS 95: 226–40.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 2009. “Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate, and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus,” in Freudenburg 2009: 360–85.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 2016. Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Fentress, E. A. 2013. “Strangers in the City: Élite Communication in the Hellenistic Central Mediterranean,” in Prag, J. R. W. and Quinn, J. C. (eds), The Hellenistic West (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 157–78.Google Scholar

Ferriss-Hill, J. 2015. Roman Satire and the Old Comic Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fiske, G. C. 1909. “Lucilius and Persius,” TAPhA 40: 121–50.Google Scholar

Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds) 2007. Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Forni, G. 2006. Le tribù romane. Vol. 4: Scripta Minora (Rome: G. Bretschneider).Google Scholar

Fortson IV, B. W. 2008. Language and Rhythm in Plautus: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Fortson IV, B. W. 2011. “Latin Prosody and Metrics,” in Clackson 2011: 92–104.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. 1957. Horace (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. 1960. Elementi plautini in Plauto, trans. F. Munari (Florence: La Nuova Italia).Google Scholar

Frank, E. 1970. “The Ictus in the Vergilian and Silver Epic Hexameter,” RIL 104: 327–31.Google Scholar

Frayn, J. M. 1993. Markets and Fairs in Roman Italy: Their Social and Economic Importance from the Second Century bc to the Third Century ad (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (ed.) 2005a. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. 2005b. “Introduction: Roman Satire,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (ed.) 2009. Horace: Satires and Epistles (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. 2013. “The Afterlife of Varro in Horace’s Sermones,” in Papanghelis, Harrison, and Frangoulidis 2013: 297–336.Google Scholar

Fruyt, M. 2011. “Word-Formation in Classical Latin,” in Clackson 2011: 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. and Hausburg, B. 2013. Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum: An Analysis of Style, Narrative Technique, and the Reception of Greek Historiography (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Garber, M. B. 2003. Quotation Marks (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Garbugino, G. 1982. “Note critiche ai libri I–VIII di Lucilio,” Studi Noniani 7: 100–15Google Scholar

Garcea, A. 2012. Caesar’s De Analogia (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gärtner, U. 2001. “Lucilius und die Freundschaft,” in Manuwald 2001a: 90–110.Google Scholar

Giardina, A. 1997. L’Italia romana: Storie di un’ identità incompiuta (Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. 2003. “The ‘Annalist’ before the Annalists: Ennius and his Annales,” in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds), Formen römi- scher Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungnen, Autoren, Kontexte (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 93–114.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. 2007. “Virgil vs. Ennius, or: The Undoing of the Annalist,” in Fitzgerald and Gowers 2007: 73–102.Google Scholar

Goh, I. 2013. “Clear as Mud: Bad Education in Lucilian Satire,” SIFC 11: 109–28.Google Scholar

Goh, I. 2014. “An Isocratean Allusion in a Lucilian Letter (181–8M=182–9K),” Philologus 158: 187–91.Google Scholar

Goh, I. 2016. “Of Cabbages and Kin: Traces of Lucilius in the First Half of Horace’s Epodes,” in Bather, P. and Stocks, C. (eds), Horace’s Epodes: Contexts, Intertexts, and Reception (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 63–83.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. 1986. Understanding Terence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. 1995. Epic in Republican Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. 2006. “Ennius After the Banquet,” Arethusa 39: 427–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldwater, S. and Johnson, M. 2003. “Learning OT Constraint Rankings Using a Maximum Entropy Model,” in Spenader, J., Eriksson, A., and Dahl, Ö. (eds), Variation within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on “Variation within Optimality Theory,” April 26–27, 2003 at Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Sweden (Stockholm: Stockholm University Department of Linguistics), 113–22.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. 2002. “A Factorial Typology of Quantity-Insensitive Stress,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 491–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 1993a. “Horace, Satires 1.5: An Inconsequential Journey,” PCPS 39: 48–66 = Freudenburg 2009: 156–80.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. 1993b. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. 2000. “Vegetable Love: Virgil, Columella, and Garden Poetry,” Ramus 29: 127–48.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. 2004. “The Plot Thickens: Hidden Outlines in Terence’s Prologues,” Ramus 33: 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 2011. “The Road to Sicily: From Lucilius to Seneca,” Ramus 40: 168–97.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. 2012. Horace: Satires Book I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Granucci, F. 2013. “Les emprunts gaulois dans la littérature latine archaïque,” EC 39: 211–47.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S., 1982. “The Satires of Ennius and Lucilius,” in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. (eds), Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 156–71.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. 1993. Plautus: Menaechmi (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. 1999. Terence: The Brothers, 2nd ed. (Warminster: Aris & Phillips).Google Scholar

Gray, C. 2015. Jerome, Vita Malchi: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. 1991. The Works of Ausonius (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Greene, J. and Kehoe, D. 1995. “Mago the Carthaginian,” in Actes du III congrès international des études phéniciennes et puniques (Tunis: Institut National du Patrimoine), 110–17.Google Scholar

Griffith, J. G. 1970. “The Ending of Juvenal’s First Satire and Lucilius Book III.” Hermes 98: 56–72.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. 1990. Greek Culture and Roman Politics (Leiden: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. 2007. “Romans and Others,” in Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds), A Companion to the Roman Republic (Oxford: Blackwell), 459–77.Google Scholar

Guggenheimer, E. H. 1972. Rhyme Effects and Rhyming Figures (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar

Habinek, T. 1990. “Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s de Amicitia.” Apeiron 23: 165–85.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Habinek, T. 2005. “Satire as Aristocratic Play,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habinek, T. 2006. “The Wisdom of Ennius,” Arethusa 39: 471–88.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. 2007. “Poets, Patrons, Rulers: The Ennian Traditions,” in Fitzgerald and Gowers 2007: 129–44.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. 1997. Virgil: Aeneid X (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Horace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. 2013. “Author and Speaker(s) in Horace’s Satires 2,” in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 153–71.Google Scholar

Harsh, P. W. 1952. “Final -s after a Short Vowel in Early Latin,” TAPhA 83: 267–78.Google Scholar

Hass, K. 2001. “Lucilius und die Frauen,” in Manuwald 2001a: 111–20.Google Scholar

Hass, K. 2007. Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom. Hermes Einzelschriften 99 (Stuttgart: F. Steiner).Google Scholar

Hendrickson, G. L. 1916. “Horace and Valerius Cato,” CPh 11: 249–69.Google Scholar

Herescu, N. I. 1959. “Ictus et accent, poétique et statistique,” Orpheus 6: 135–7.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hine, H. 2005. “Poetic Influence on Prose: The Case of the Younger Seneca,” in Reinhardt, Lapidge, and Adams 2005: 211–37.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. 2002. The Ancient Fable: An Introduction (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar

Hooley, D. 2007. Roman Satire (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. 1976. “The Collegium Poetarum,” BICS 23: 79–95.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. 1981. “Some Problems of Titulature in Roman Literary History,” BICS 28: 103–14.Google Scholar

Houghton, L. B. T. 2004. “The Wolf and the Dog (Horace, Sermones 2.2.64),” CQ 54: 300–4.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. 1907. “Luciliana,” CQ 1: 53–74, 148–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Housman, A. E. 1934. “Ennius in Pers. VI 9,” CR 48: 50–1.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. 1937. M. Manilii Astronomicon liber primus, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. 1991. The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1983. Eubulus: The Fragments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 2008. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson Knight, W. F. 1931a. “Homodyne in the Fourth Foot of the Vergilian Hexameter,” CQ 25: 184–94.Google Scholar

Jackson Knight, W. F. 1931b. “Texture in Vergil’s Rhythms,” CJ 27: 192–202.Google Scholar

Jackson Knight, W. F. 1939. Accentual Symmetry in Vergil (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Janssen, H. H. 1988. “Le caratteristiche della lingua poetica romana,” in Lunelli, A. (ed.), La lingua poetica latina, 3rd ed. (Bologna: Pàtron), 69–130.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1900. “Den psykologiske Grund til nogle metriske Fænomener,” Oversigt over det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs forhandlinger 1900: 487–530.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. 1969. The Tragedies of Ennius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Joseph, B. D. and Wallace, R. E. 1992. “Socially Determined Variation in Ancient Rome,” Language Variation and Change 4: 105–19.Google Scholar

Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. 1995. Suetonius: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kay, N. M. 2001. Ausonius: Epigrams (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Keane, C. 2002. “The Critical Contexts of Satiric Discourse,” CML 22: 7–31.Google Scholar

Keane, C. 2006. Figuring Genre in Roman Satire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Keane, C. 2007. “Defining the Art of Blame,” in Quintero, R. (ed.), A Companion to Satire: Ancient and Modern (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 2012. “Satiric Textures: Style, Metre and Rhetoric,” in Braund, S. and Osgood, J. (eds), A Companion to Persius and Juvenal (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell), 113–36.Google Scholar

Kent, R. G. 1911. “Lucilius on ei and i,” AJPh 32: 272–93.Google Scholar

Keulen, W. 2009. Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1975. “Stress, Syntax, and Meter,” Language 51: 576–616.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1977. “The Rhythmic Structure of English Verse,” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 189–247.Google Scholar

Klodt, C. (ed.) 1996. Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag (Hildesheim: G. Olms).Google Scholar

Knox, P. 2012. “Language, Style and Metre in Horace,” in Günther, H.-C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Horace (Leiden: Brill), 527–46.Google Scholar

Köhm, J. 1905. Altlateinische Forschungen (Leipzig: Reisland).Google Scholar

Konrad, C. F. 1982. “Quaestiones Tappulae,” ZPE 48: 219–34.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Koster, S. 1980. Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur (Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain).Google Scholar

Koster, S. 2001. “Lucilius und die Literarkritik,” in Manuwald 2001a: 121–31.Google Scholar

Krahe, H. 1941. “Die Ortsnamen des antiken Lukaniens und Bruttierlandes,” Zeitschrift für Ortsnamenforschung 17: 74–140.Google Scholar

Krenkel, W. 1970. Lucilius Satiren, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Kron, G. 2014. “Animal Husbandry,” in Campbell, G. L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–35.Google Scholar

Kropp, A. 2008. Defixiones: Ein aktuelles corpus lateinischer Fluchtafeln (Speyer: Kartoffeldr.-Verlag Brodersen).Google Scholar

Krostenko, B. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1955. Ausfürliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Satzlehre, 3rd ed., rev. A. Thierfelder (Hanover: Hahn).Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (ed.) 2009. Jacob Wackernagel, Lectures on Syntax: With Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Laughton, E. Laughton, E. 1970. Review of E. Fraenkel, Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos (Rome: Storia e Letteratura, 1968), JRS 60: 188–94.Google Scholar

Lausberg, H. 1960. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft (Munich: M. Hueber).Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. 1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 b.c.e.,” TAPhA 129: 139–79.Google Scholar

Leo, F. 1960. “Anzeige von Lucilii Carminum Reliquiae ed. Marx, I–II,” in Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, ed. Fraenkel, E. (Rome: Storia e Letteratura), vol. 1, 221–47.Google Scholar

Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. 1996. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Leumann, M. 1947. “Die lateinische Dichtersprache,” MH 4: 116–39.Google Scholar

Leumann, M. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 6th ed. (Munich: C. H. Beck).Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. 2004. “Tacitus’ Dialogus as Literary History,” TAPhA 134: 157–200.Google Scholar

Lindner, T. 2002. Lateinische Komposita: Morphologische, historische und lexikalische Studien (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. 1901. Nonius Marcellus’ Dictionary of Republican Latin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. 1905. “De citationibus apud Nonium Marcellum,” Philologus 64: 438–64.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. 1994. “Political History, 146–95 b.c.,” in Crook, J. A., Lintott, A., and Rawson, E. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 40–103.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. 1999. Violence in Republican Rome, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lodge, G. 1924. Lexicon Plautinum (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. 2000. Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur lateinischen Sprachgeschichte und Philologie, ed. Berschin, W. (Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann).Google Scholar

Lomas, K. 2008. “Script Obsolescence in Ancient Italy: From Pre-Roman to Roman Writing,” in Baines, J., Bennet, J., and Houston, S. (eds), The Disappearance of Writing Systems: Perspectives on Literacy and Communication (London: Equinox Publishing), 109–38.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

McClelland, J. 2007. Body and Mind: Sport in Europe from the Roman Empire to the Renaissance (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar

McConnell, S. 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

McDiarmid, L. 2014. Poets and the Peacock Dinner: The Literary History of a Meal (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

McDonnell, M. 2006a. “Roman Aesthetics and the Spoils of Syracuse,” in Dillon, S. and Welch, K. (eds), Representations of War in Ancient Rome (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 68–90.Google Scholar

McDonnell, M. 2006b. Roman Manliness: Virtue and the Roman Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

McGing, B. 2010. Polybius’ Histories (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Mackay, L. A. 1963. “In Defence of Ennius,” CR 13: 264–5.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. 1985. “The Distribution of Greek Loan-Words in Terence,” CQ 35: 110–23.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. 1995. “The Distribution of Greek Loan-Words in Plautus,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 31–69.Google Scholar

Mancini, A. 1980. “Le iscrizioni della Valcamonica.” Studi Urbinati di storia, filosofia, letteratura, Supplemento 2/1: 75–166.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) 2001a. Der Satiriker Lucilius und seine Zeit (Munich: C. H. Beck).Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. 2001b. Fabulae praetextae: Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer (Munich: C. H. Beck).Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. 2009. “Concilia deorum: Ein episches Motiv in der römischen Satire,” in Felgentreu, F., Mundt, F., and Rücker, N. (eds), Per attentam Caesaris aurem. Satire – Die unpolitische Gattung? (Tübingen: Gunter Narr), 46–61.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. 2005. “Traces of a Freed Language: Horace, Petronius, and the Rhetoric of Fable,” ClAnt 24: 307–30.Google Scholar

Mariotti, I. 1954. “I grecismi di Lucilio,” StudUrb(B) 28: 357–86.Google Scholar

Mariotti, I. 1960. Studi luciliani (Florence: La Nuova Italia).Google Scholar

Mariotti, I. 1963. “Horret et alget,” in Lanx satura Nicolao Terzaghi oblata (Genoa: Istituto di Filologia), 249–60.Google Scholar

Mariotti, S. 1991. Lezioni su Ennio, 2nd ed. (Urbino: QuattroVenti).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. 1949. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. Vol. 3: Les articulations de l’énoncé (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. 1954. Traité de Stylistique latine, 3rd ed. (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. 1989. Tacitus: Annals Book IV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Martyn, J. R. 1966. “Imagery in Lucilius,” WZRostock 15: 493–505.Google Scholar

Martyn, J. R. 1972. “Satis saturae?,” Mnemosyne 25: 157–67.Google Scholar

Marx, F. 1904–5. C. Lucilii Carminum Reliquiae, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Marzano, A. 2007. Roman Villas in Central Italy: A Social and Economic History (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Marzano, A. 2013. Harvesting the Sea: The Exploitation of Marine Resources in the Roman Mediterranean (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Mayer, R. 1994. Horace: Epistles Book 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Mayer, R. 2003. “Persona(l) Problems: The Literary Persona in Antiquity Revisited,” MD 50: 55–80.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. 2005. “Sleeping with the Enemy: Satire and Philosophy,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 146–59.Google Scholar

Mazzarino, A. 1950. “Per la tradizione di Lucilio,” Maia 3: 137–41.Google Scholar

Mercado, A. 2012. Italic Verse: A Study of the Poetic Remains of Old Latin, Faliscan, and Sabellic (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar

Meiser, G. 1998. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Meiser, G. 2014. Etruskische Texte II, editio minor, 2 vols. (Hamburg: Baar-Verlag).Google Scholar

Meyer, E. A. 2004. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Michels, A. K. 1944. “ΠΑΡΡΗΣΙΑ and the Satire of Horace,” CPh 39: 173–7.Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. 2005. Latin Verse Satire (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. 2007. “The Penetrating I: Lucilius and the Body as the Site of Truth,” in Tomiche, A. and Zoberman, P. (eds), Littérature et identités sexuelles (Paris: Société Française de Littérature Générale et Comparée), 91–104.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. 2010. Musa pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Moro, C. 1995. La varietà e la norma: I frammenti giambo-trocaici di Lucilio fra versificazione drammatica e alessandrinismo (Padua: Imprimatur).Google Scholar

Mosca, M. 1960. “I presunti modelli del Concilium deorum di Lucilio,” PP 15: 373–84.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (ed.) 1997. Collecting Fragments, Fragmente sammeln (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Muecke, F. 1993. Horace: Satires II (Warminster: Aris & Phillips).Google Scholar

Muecke, F. 2005. “Rome’s First ‘Satirists’: Themes and Genre in Ennius and Lucilius,” in Freudenburg 2005a: 33–47.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. 2013. “The Invention of Satire: A Paradigmatic Case?,” in Papanghelis, Harrison, and Frangoulidis 2013: 283–95.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. 1990. Virgil: Georgics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Naughtin, V. P. 1952. “Metrical Patterns in Lucretius’ Hexameters,” CQ 2: 152–67.Google Scholar

Nilsson, N.-O. 1952. Metrische Stildifferenzen in den Satiren des Horaz (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell).Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1961. Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

O’Neill, E. G. 1940. “Word-Accents and Final Syllables in Latin Verse,” TAPhA 71: 335–59.Google Scholar

Oniga, R. 1988. I composti nominali latini: Una morfologia generativa (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar

Opelt, I. 1965. Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: eine Typologie (Heidelberg: C. Winter).Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. 2012. “Lucilius 93–94 Marx: Chaere, Tite,” CPh 107: 355–8.Google Scholar

Palmer, R. E. A. 1997. Rome and Carthage at Peace (Stuttgart: F. Steiner).Google Scholar

Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius: The Fragments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Panico, G. 1980. “Caton et Lélius chez Cicéron: sagesse grecque ou sagesse romaine?,” in Caron, J.-B., Fortin, M., and Maloney, G. (eds), Mélanges d’Études offerts à Maurice Lebel (Quebec: Éditions du Sphinx), 257–66.Google Scholar

Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds) 2013. Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Trends in Classics supplementary volume 20 (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Parker, H. 1996. “Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-Examined,” AJPh 117: 585–617.Google Scholar

Partoens, G., Roskam, G., and Van Houdt, T. 2004. “Introduction: The Semantics and Pragmatics of virtus,” in Virtutis imago: Studies on the Conceptualisation and Transformation of an Ancient Ideal (Leuven: Peeters), 1–26.Google Scholar

Pawłowski, A. and Eder, M. 2001. “Quantity or Stress? Sequential Analysis of Latin Prosody,” Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 81–97.Google Scholar

Pennacini, A. 1966. “Docti e crassi nella poetica di Lucilio,” AAT 100: 293–360.Google Scholar

Pennacini, A. 1968. “Funzioni della rappresentazione del reale nella satira di Lucilio,” AAT 102: 311–435.Google Scholar

Pennacini, A. 1987. “L’immaginario e la cultura degli avi,” Aufidus 2: 29–46.Google Scholar

Penney, J. H. W. 1988. “The Languages of Italy,” in Boardman, J., Hammond, N. G. L., Lewis, D. M., and Ostwald, M. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 720–38.Google Scholar

Penney, J. H. W. 2005. “Connections in Archaic Latin Prose,” in Reinhardt, Lapidge, and Adams 2005: 37–51.Google Scholar

Penney, J. H. W. 2011. “Archaic and Old Latin,” in Clackson 2011: 220–35.Google Scholar

Perkins, D. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Petersmann, H. 1999. “The Language of Early Roman Satire: Its Function and Characteristics,” in Adams and Mayer 1999: 289–310.Google Scholar

Pezzini, G. 2011. “Contraction of est in Latin,” TPhS 109: 327–43.Google Scholar

Pezzini, G. 2015. Terence and the Verb “To Be” in Latin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Pezzini, G. 2016. “Comic Lexicon: Searching for Underground Latin from Plautus to Erasmus,” in Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. (eds), Early and Late Latin: Continuity of Change? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 14–46.Google Scholar

Pierini, R. 1971. “Note a Lucilio,” SIFC 43: 199–221.Google Scholar

Pina Polo, F. 2001. “Über die sogennante cohors amicorum des Scipio Aemilianus,” in Peachin, M. (ed.), Aspects of Friendship in the Graeco-Roman World, JRA Supplementary Series 43 (Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology), 89–98.Google Scholar

Pinkster, H. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Pisani, V. 1962. Storia della lingua latina (Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier).Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 1984. “Filtri culturali ed ipotesi linguistiche nella tradizione e negli studi relativi al teonimo italico Angitia,” Abruzzo 22: 207–29.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 2003. “Il plurilinguismo nelle Satire di Lucilio e le selve dell’interpretazione: Gli elementi italici nei frammenti 581 e 1318 M.,” in Oniga, R. (ed.), Il plurilinguismo nella tradizione letteraria latina (Rome: Il Calamo), 63–89.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 2005. “Il declino (o i presunti declini) della Magna Grecia, aspetti della fenomenologia linguistica,” in Tramonto della Magna Grecia (Taranto: ISAMG), 77–159.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 2006. “Fenomeni di allomorfismo flessionale in ambiente bilingue osco-greco. Un contributo alla storia di lat. Aiāx, Bruttāx e oltre,” in Scritti linguistici in onore di Roberto Gusmani (Alessandria: Orso), 1359–72.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 2014. “Bilingues Bruttaces. Il plurilinguismo di una città della Magna Grecia attraverso i suoi testi: il caso di Petelia,” in Giacomelli, R. and Bianchi, A. R. (eds), Le lingue dell’Italia antica oltre il latino: Lasciamo parlare i testi. Incontro di Studio 50 (Milan: Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere), 73–110.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P., Poli, D., and Santini, C. 1999. Una storia della lingua latina (Rome: Carocci).Google Scholar

Porzio Gernia, M. L. 1981. “Gli elementi celtici del latino,” in Campanile 1981b: 97–123.Google Scholar

Potthoff, A. 1992. Lateinische Kleidungsbezeichnungen in synchroner und diachroner Sicht (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar

Probert, P. 2002. “On the Prosody of Latin Enclitics,” Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 7: 181–205.Google Scholar

Prosdocimi, A. L. 1988. “La lingua,” in Fogolari, G. and Prosdocimi, A. L. (eds), I Veneti antichi: Lingua e cultura (Padua: Studio Editoriale Programma), 221–440.Google Scholar

Pryor, A. D. 1962. “Juvenal’s False Consolation,” AUMLA 18: 167–80.Google Scholar

Puccioni, G. 1944. “L’uso stilistico dei composti nominali latini,” RAL, series 7, 4: 371–481.Google Scholar

Puelma Piwonka, M. 1949. Lucilius und Kallimachos (Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann).Google Scholar

Purcell, N. 1985. “Wine and Wealth in Ancient Italy,” JRS 75: 1–19.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. 1995. “Eating Fish: The Paradoxes of Seafood,” in Wilkins, J., Harvey, D., and Dobson, M. (eds), Food in Antiquity (Exeter: University of Exeter Press), 132–49.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. 2003. “The Way We Used to Eat: Diet, Community, and History at Rome,” AJPh 124: 329–58.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Questa, C. 2007. La metrica di Plauto e di Terenzio (Urbino: QuattroVenti).Google Scholar

Raschke, W. 1987. “Arma pro amico – Lucilian Satire at the Crisis of the Roman Republic,” Hermes 115: 299–318.Google Scholar

Raschke, W. 1990. “The Virtue of Lucilius,” Latomus 49: 352–69.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M., and Adams, J. N. (eds) 2005. Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Relihan, J. C. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Renehan, R. 1977. “Compound-Simplex Verbal Iteration in Plautus,” CPh 72: 243–8.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. 1999. Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Rix, H. 2002. Sabellische Texte: Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen, und Südpikenische (Heidelberg: C. Winter).Google Scholar

Rolfe, J. C. 1928. “On Lucilius 327 (Marx),” CPh 23: 183–5.Google Scholar

Roman, L. 2014. Poetic Autonomy in Ancient Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Ronconi, A. 1963. “Lucilio critico letterario,” Maia 15: 515–25.Google Scholar

Rosén, H. 2009. “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-Part Modification – The Contribution of Particles,” in Baldi and Cuzzolin 2009: 317–441.Google Scholar

Rosen, R. M. 2007. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Rosen, R. M. 2012. “Satire in the Republic: From Lucilius to Horace,” in Braund and Osgood 2012: 19–40.Google Scholar

Rosivach, V. J. 2006. “The Lex Fannia Sumptuaria of 161 B.C.,” CJ 102: 1–15.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. and Breed, B. W. 2006. “Introduction: Ennius and the Traditions of Epic,” Arethusa 39: 397–425.Google Scholar

Rudd, N. 1966. The Satires of Horace (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press).Google Scholar

Rudd, N. 1986. Themes in Roman Satire (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Rudd, N. 2005. Horace: Satires and Epistles, Persius: Satires (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar

Rüpke, J. 2000. “Räume literarischer Kommunikation in der Formierungsphase römischer Literatur,” in Braun, M., Haltenhoff, A., and Mutschler, F. H. (eds), Moribus antiquis res stat Romana: Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr. (Munich: Saur), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rüpke, J. 2001. “Kulturtransfer als Rekodierung: Zum literaturgeschichtlichen und sozialen Ort der frühen römischen Epik,” in Rüpke, J. (ed.), Von Göttern und Menschen erzählen: Formkonstanzen und Funktionswandel vormoderner Epik (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 42–64.Google Scholar

Rüpke, J. 2004. “Acta aut agenda: Relations of Script and Performance,” in Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S. A. (eds), Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome (Stuttgart: F. Steiner), 23–44.Google Scholar

Russo, A. 2007. Quinto Ennio: Le Opere Minori (Pisa: ETS).Google Scholar

Rutledge, S. 2012. Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Schilling, N. 2004. “Investigating Stylistic Variation,” in Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling, N. (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (Oxford: Blackwell), 375–401.Google Scholar

Schlegel, C. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech in Horace Satires Book 1 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

Schmidt, P. L. 1989. “Postquam ludus in artem paulatim verterat. Varro und die Frühgeschichte des römischen Theaters,” in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Studien zur vorliterarischen Periode im frühen Rom, ScriptOralia 12 (Tübingen: Gunter Narr), 77–133.Google Scholar

Scholz, U. 1984. “Der ‘Scipio’ des Ennius,” Hermes 112: 183–99.Google Scholar

Scholz, U. 1996. “Lucilius 612M = 672K,” in Klodt 1996: 29–35.Google Scholar

Schumacher, S. 2004. Die Rätischen Inschriften. Geschichte und heutiger Stand der Forschung, 2nd ed. (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar

Schwindt, J. P. 2000. Prolegomena zu einer “Phänomenologie” der römischen Literaturgeschichtsschreibung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Sciarrino, E. 2010. “Roman Oratory before Cicero: The Elder Cato and Gaius Gracchus,” in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 54–66.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. 1987. “Horace, Lucilius, and Callimachean Polemic,” HSPh 91: 199–215 = Freudenburg 2009: 212–30.Google Scholar

Sharland, S. 2010. Horace in Dialogue: Bakhtinian Readings in the Satires (Bern: Peter Lang).Google Scholar

Shaw, C. 2009. “ΣΚΟΡΠΙΟΣ or ΣΚΩΡ ΠΕΟΣ? A Sexual Joke in Archestratus’ Hedypatheia,” CQ 59: 634–9.Google Scholar

Shero, L. R. 1923. “The Cena in Roman Satire,” CPh 18: 126–43.Google Scholar

Shero, L. R. 1929. “Lucilius’ Cena rustica,” AJPh 50: 64–70.Google Scholar

Sheskin, D. J. 2007. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, 4th ed. (Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC).Google Scholar

Sihler, A. L. 1995. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar

Skutsch, F. 1893. “De Lucilii Prosodia,” RhM 48: 303–7.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. 1968. Studia Enniana (London: Athlone).Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Smith, C. J. and Covino, R. (eds) 2010. Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales).Google Scholar

Solinas, P. 1995. “Il celtico in Italia,” SE 60: 311–408.Google Scholar

Somerville, T. 2007. “The Orthography of the New Gallus and the Spelling Rules of Lucilius,” ZPE 106: 59–64.Google Scholar

Sommer, F. 1909. “Lucilius als Grammatiker,” Hermes 44: 70–7.Google Scholar

Stockton, D. 1979. The Gracchi (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Stowasser, J. M. 1880. Der Hexameter des Lucilius (Vienna: Selbstverlag der Lehranstalt [K.K. Staatsgymnasium im IX. Bezirke]).Google Scholar

Stowasser, J. M. 1881. “Zu Lucilius,” WS 3: 277–86.Google Scholar

Stowasser, J. M. 1905. “Vulgärmetrisches aus Lucilius,” WS 27: 211–30.Google Scholar

Süss, W. 1910. Ethos: Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter. Livius Andronicus – Naevius – Ennius (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. 2002. “Gelegenheitsdichtung und Kleinformen,” in Suerbaum, W. (ed.), Handbuch der Lateinischen Literatur der Antike. Vol. 1: Die Archaische Literatur (Munich: C. H. Beck), 319–40.Google Scholar

Sullivan, J. P. 1970. Final -s in Early Latin. Diss. Yale.Google Scholar

Svarlien, J. 1994. “Lucilianus Character,” AJPh 115: 253–67.Google Scholar

Terzaghi, N. 1966. Lucili saturarum reliquiae, 3rd ed. (Florence: Le Monnier).Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 1988. Virgil: Georgics, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Torrego, M. E. 2009. “Coordination,” in Baldi and Cuzzolin 2009: 443–87.Google Scholar

Trappes-Lomax, J. M. 2002. “Three Suggestions in Latin Poetry,” CQ 52: 609–12.Google Scholar

Uden, J. 2007. “Impersonating Priapus,” AJPh 128: 1–26.Google Scholar

Ullman, B. L. 1913. “Satura and Satire,” CPh 8: 172–94.Google Scholar

Van Hook, L. 1917. “Ψυχρότης ἤ τὸ Ψυχρόν,” CPh 12: 68–76.Google Scholar

Van Rooy, C. A. 1966. Studies in Classical Satire and Related Literary Theory (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Van Straaten, M. 1946. Panétius, sa vie, ses écrits et sa doctrine, avec une edition des fragments (Amsterdam: Paris).Google Scholar

Vine, B. 1993. Studies in Archaic Latin Inscriptions (Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck).Google Scholar

Vollmer, F. 1905. Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Auctores Antiquissimi, vol. 14 (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Von Albrecht, M. 1997. A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Von Premerstein, A. 1904. “Lex Tappula,” Hermes 39: 327–47.Google Scholar

Wachter, R. 1987. Altlateinische Inschriften (Bern: Peter Lang).Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. 1979. A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. 3 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Wallace, R. 1984. “The Deletion of -s in Plautus,” AJPh 105: 213–25.Google Scholar

Wallace, R. 2011. “The Latin Alphabet and Orthography,” in Clackson 2011: 10–28.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Warmington, E. H. 1967. Remains of Old Latin. Vol. 3: Lucilius; The Twelve Tables, rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Watkins, C. 1963. “Preliminaries to a Historical and Comparative Analysis of the Syntax of the Old Irish Verb,” Celtica 6: 1–49.Google Scholar

Weiss, M. 2009. Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin (Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press).Google Scholar

Welsh, J. T. 2011. “Accius, Porcius Licinus, and the Beginning of Latin Literature,” JRS 101: 31–50.Google Scholar

West, M. L. 1982. Greek Metre (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

West, M. L. 2007. Indo-European Poetry and Myth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

White, D. C. 1980. “The Method of Composition and Sources of Nonius Marcellus,” Studi Noniani 8: 111–212.Google Scholar

White, K. D. 1975. Farm Equipment of the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Hermes Einzelschriften 24 (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner).Google Scholar

Wilcox, A. 2005. “Sympathetic Rivals: Consolation in Cicero’s Letters,” AJPh 126: 237–55.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. 2003. “Land and Sea: Italy and the Mediterranean in the Roman Discourse of Dining,” AJPh 124: 359–75.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. 1985. Golden Latin Artistry (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar

Williams, C. 2008. “Friends of the Roman People: Some Remarks on the Language of Amicitia,” in Coşkun, A. (ed.), Freundschaft und Gefolgschaft in den auswärtigen Beziehungen der Römer (2. Jahrhundert v.Chr. – 1. Jahrhundert n.Chr.) (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang) 29–44.Google Scholar

Williams, C. 2012. Reading Roman Friendship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Williams, G. 1995. “Libertino Patre Natus: True or False?,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 296–313.Google Scholar

Wills, J. 1996. Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wilson, M. 1997. “The Subjugation of Grief in Seneca’s Epistles,” in Braund and Gill 1997: 48–67.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, M. 1970. Problems in Quintilian. BICS Supplement 25 (London: University of London Institute of Classical Studies).Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 2009. Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wölfflin, E. 1933. Ausgewählte Schriften, ed. Mayer, G. (Leipzig: Dieterich).Google Scholar

Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia Palliata (Rome: American Academy).Google Scholar

Zanda, E. 2011. Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic (London: Bristol Classical Press).Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. 1980. “Horace’s Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–77.Google Scholar

Zillinger, W. 1911. Cicero und die altrömischen Dichter (Würzburg: F. Staudenraus).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, B. 2001. “Lucilius und Aristophanes,” in Manuwald 2001a: 188–95.Google Scholar

Zucchelli, B. 1977. L’indipendenza di Lucilio (Florence: La Nuova Italia).Google Scholar