Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D. (2003). Rethinking Institutional Analysis: Interviews with Vincent and Elinor Ostrom. (Interview), Mercatus Center at George Mason University.Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D. (2014). Institutional Diversity and Political Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D. (2016). Neither Market nor State Domain: Nonprofits from the Ostroms’ Theoretical Perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4_suppl), 43S–60S.Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D., and Boettke, P. J. (2009). Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D., & Tarko, V. (2013). Co-Production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 726-741.Google Scholar

Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anheier, H. K., and Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.). (2003). The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University Monograph 12, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I., and Thurik, A. R. (Eds.). (2007). Explaining Entrepreneurship and the Role of Policy: A Framework. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Bakunin, M. A. (1990). Bakunin: Statism and Anarchy, edited by Shatz, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, R. E. (1998). The Structure of Liberty: Justice & the Rule of Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, N. P. (1988). The Invisible Hand in Economics and Politics: A Study in the Two Conflicting Explanations of Society: End-States and Processes, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.Google Scholar

Ben-Ner, A. (1986). Nonprofit Organizations: Why Do They Exist in Market Economies? In Rose-Ackerman, S., ed., The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–113.Google Scholar

Ben-Ner, A., and Gui, B. (2003). The Theory of Nonprofit Organizations Revisited. In Anheier, H. K. and Ben-Ner, A., eds., The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches, Boston: Springer, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. E. (2006). Democratic Competence, Before Converse and After. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 105–141.Google Scholar

Bergson, A. (1954). On the Concept of Social Welfare. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 233–252.Google Scholar

Boettke, P. (2010). Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Boettke, P. J., and Coyne, C. J. (2008). The Political Economy of the Philanthropic Enterprise. In Shockley, G. E., Frank, P. M., and Stough, R., eds., Non-Market Entrepreneurship: Interdisciplinary Approaches, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 71–88.Google Scholar

Boettke, P., and Prychitko, D. (2004). Is an Independent Nonprofit Sector Prone to Failure? Toward an Austrian School Interpretation of Nonprofit and Voluntary Action. Conversations on Philanthropy, 1(1), 1–63.Google Scholar

Boulding, K. E. (1981). A Preface to Grants Economics: The Economy of Love and Fear, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Boyte, Harry (2011). Public Work and the Politics of the Commons. The Good Society, 20(1), 84–102.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., and Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining Norms, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. (2016a). Against Democracy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. (2016b, June 24). Ethicist Jason Brennan: Brexit, Democracy, and Epistocracy. Princeton University Press Blog. Retrieved from http://blog.press.princeton.edu/2016/06/24/ethicist-jason-brennan-brexit-democracy-and-epistocracy/Google Scholar

Brennan, J. (2016c, August 28). Can Epistocracy, or Knowledge-Based Voting, Fix Democracy? Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-brennan-epistocracy-20160828-snap-story.htmlGoogle Scholar

Brennan, J. (2017). Against Democracy, new preface edition, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Breton, A. (1996). Competitive Governments, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1964). What Should Economists Do? Southern Economic Journal, 30(3), 213–222.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. ([1968] 1999). The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan Vol. 5: The Demand and Supply of Public Goods, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1979). What Should Economists Do? Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1984). Politics Without Romance: A Sketch of Positive Public Choice Theory and Its Normative Implications. In Buchanan, J. M. and Tollison, R. D., eds., The Theory of Public Choice II, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1987). Justification of the Compound Republic: The Calculus in Retrospect. Cato Journal, 7(2), 305–315.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1990). The Domain of Constitutional Economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1991). The Foundations of Normative Individualism. In Buchanan, J. M., ed., The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press., pp. 221–229.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (1999). The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan Vol. 1: The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The Soul of Classical Liberalism. The Independent Review, 5(1), 111–119.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. (2006). Why I, Too, Am Not a Conservative: The Normative Vision of Classical Liberalism, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Caplan, B. (2001). Rational Irrationality and the Microfoundations of Political Failure. Public Choice, 107(3), 311–331.Google Scholar

Caplan, B. (2008). The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies, new edition with a new preface by the author, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carson, K. (2013). Governance, Agency and Autonomy: Anarchist Themes in the Work of Elinor Ostrom. The Center for a Stateless Society Paper No. 16 (Second Half 2013).Google Scholar

Cartwright, N., and Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1961). The Myth of the State, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010). The Cultural and Political Economy of Recovery: Social Learning in a Post-Disaster Environment, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, J. P. (2013). The Impossible Community: Realizing Communitarian Anarchism, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar

Clemens, E. S. (2006). The Constitution of Citizens: Political Theories of Nonprofit Organizations. In Powell, W. W. and Steinberg, R., eds., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 207–220.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1975). Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. In Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W., eds., Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4, Boston: Addison-Wesley, pp. 75–169.Google Scholar

Cooter, R. (1997). Normative Failure Theory of Law. Cornell Law Review, 82(5), 947–979.Google Scholar

Cooter, R. (1998). Expressive Law and Economics. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coyne, C. (2013). Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Crowder, G. (1992). Classical Anarchism : The Political Thought of Godwin, Proudhon, Bakunin, and Kropotkin, 1st edition, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dollery, B. E., and Wallis, J. (2003). The Political Economy of the Voluntary Sector: A Reappraisal of the Comparative Institutional Advantage of Voluntary Organisations, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Durieux, H. (2011). Subsidiarity, Anarchism, and the Governance of Complexity. Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten, Contactforum.Google Scholar

Easterly, W. (2008). Design and Reform of Institutions in LDCs and Transition Economies Institutions: Top Down or Bottom Up? American Economic Review, 98(2), 95–99.Google Scholar

Elkin, S. and Soltan, K. (Eds.). (1999). Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Ellerman, D. P. (1986). The Employment Contract and Liberal Thought. Review of Social Economy, 44(1), 13–39.Google Scholar

Ellerman, D. (1999). The Democratic Firm: An Argument Based on Ordinary Jurisprudence. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(2), 111–124.Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1989). The Cement of Society: A Survey of Social Order, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, R. A. (2003). Skepticism and Freedom: A Modern Case for Classical Liberalism, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, R. A. (2009). Simple Rules for a Complex World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, W. D. (2013). Collective Action and Exchange: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Contemporary Political Economy. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Foss, N. (1994). The Theory of the Firm: The Austrians as Precursors and Critics of Contemporary Theory. Review of Austrian Economics, 7(1), 31–65.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Freeden, M. (2015). In Freeden, M., Sargent, L. T., and Stears, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, Reprint edition, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, D. (1973). The Machinery of Freedom, Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Friedman, J. (2006). Democratic Competence in Normative and Positive Theory: Neglected Implications of “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–43.Google Scholar

Galston, W. A. (1991). Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gaus, G. (2010). The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaus, G. (2011). Between Discovery and Choice: The General Will in a Diverse Society. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 3(2), 70–95.Google Scholar

Gaus, G. (2013). The Evolution, Evaluation, and Reform of Social Morality: A Hayekian Analysis. In Peart, S. J. and Levy, D. M., eds., F. A. Hayek and the Modern Economy: Economic Organization and Activity, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59–88.Google Scholar

Gaus, G. (2016). The Tyranny of the Ideal: Justice in a Diverse Society, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gaus, G. (2017). Is Public Reason a Normalization Project? Deep Diversity and the Open Society. Social Philosophy Today, 33, 27–52.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. I. (1999). Social Epistemology. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 31(93), 3–19.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. I., and Whitcomb, D. (Eds.). (2011). Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, 1st edition, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, E. (2012). Anarchism and Other Essays, Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. and Tilly, C. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, 1st edition, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83(6), 1420–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D., and Shapiro, I. (1996). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Groenewegen, J. (2011). The Bloomington School and American Institutionalism. The Good Society, 20(1): 15–36.Google Scholar

Grube, L., and Storr, V. H. (2013). The Capacity for Self-Governance and Post-Disaster Resiliency. Review of Austrian Economics, 27(3), 301–324.Google Scholar

Gutmann, A. (1980). Liberal Equality, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hammack, D. C., and Young, D. R. (1993). Nonprofit Organizations in a Market Economy: Understanding New Roles, Issues, and Trends, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. (2003). The Role of Trust in Nonprofit Enterprise. In Anheier, H. and Ben-Ner, A., eds., The Study of the Nonprofit Enterprise: Theories and Approaches, Boston: Springer, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar

Hansmann, H., and Powell, W. W. (1987). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organization. In Powell, W. W. and Steinberg, R., eds., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 117–139.Google Scholar

Harper, D. A., and Lewis, P. (2012). New Perspectives on Emergence in Economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 82(2–3), 329–37.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–30.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. (1948). Economics and Knowledge. Reprinted in Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. ([1960] 1978). The Constitution of Liberty, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. (1967). Notes on the Evolution of Systems of Rules of Conduct. In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 66–81.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. (]1973] 1998). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order, unknown edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. ([1976] 1998). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. ([1979] 1998). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 3: The Political Order of a Free People, Volume 3 in series; softcover edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. (1992). Why I Am Not a Conservative. The Centre for Independent Studies, 41, 1–28.Google Scholar

Heckathorn, D. (1996). The Dynamics and Dilemmas of Collective Action. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 250–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmke, G., and Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1971). Introduction: Political Economics and Possibilism. In Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America, 1st edition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 26–37.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy, 1st edition, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huemer, M. (2012). The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Iannaccone, L. (1998). Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature. 36 (3), 1465–1495.Google Scholar

James, E., (Ed.). (1989). The Nonprofit Sector in International Perspective: Studies in Comparative Culture & Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, E. (1990). Economic Theories of the Nonprofit Sector: A Comparative Perspective. In Anheier, H. K. and Seibel, W., eds., The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar

Johnson, J., and Orr, S. (2017). Institutions, Capabilities, Citizens, paper presented at Fact/Values/Strategies, Tisch College of Civic Studies, Tufts University.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. (2006). Everything Bad is Good for You: How Today’s Popular Culture is Actually Making Us Smarter, 1st reprint edition, New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Jones, G. (2015). Hive Mind: How Your Nation’s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own, 1st edition, Stanford, CA: Stanford Economics and Finance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keefer, P., and Knack, S. (2008). Social Capital, Social Norms and the New Institutional Economics. In Ménard, C. and Shirley, M. M., eds., Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Dordreccht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 701–725.Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. (1992). The Meaning of the Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. (1960). The Economic Point of View: An Essay in the History of Economic Thought, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.Google Scholar

Klein, P., Mahoney, J., McGahan, A., and Pitelis, C. (2010). Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Kliemt, H. (2011). Tayloring Game Theory the Ostrom Way. The Good Society, 20(1), 37–50.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Knight, J., and Johnson, J. (2011). The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kogelmann, B. (2017). Justice, Diversity, and the Well-Ordered Society. The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(269), 663–684.Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (1987). Anarchism and Anarchist Communism: Its Basis and Principles, (edited by Walter, N.), London: Freedom Press.Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. (2012). Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution, Courier Corporation.Google Scholar

Kuhnert, S. (2001). An Evolutionary Theory of Collective Action: Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship for the Common Good. Constitutional Political Economy, 12(1), 13–29.Google Scholar

Kukathas, C. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kuran, T. (1997). Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuran, T., and Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation. Stanford Law Review, 51(4), 683–768.Google Scholar

Lachmann, L. M. (1966). Sir John Hicks on Capital and Growth. South African Journal of Economics, 34(2), 113–123.Google Scholar

Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The Legacy of Max Weber: Three Essays, Berkeley: The Glaendessary Press.Google Scholar

Lachmann, L. M. (1986). The Market as an Economic Process, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2012a). Democratic Reason: The Mechanisms of Collective Intelligence in Politics. In Landemore, H. and Elster, J., eds., Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–289.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2012b). Why the Many are Smarter Than the Few and Why it Matters. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1).Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, reprint edition, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lau, R. R., and Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971.Google Scholar

Lessig, L. (1995). The Regulation of Social Meaning. University of Chicago Law Review, 62(3), 943–1045.Google Scholar

Levine, P. (2011). Seeing Like a Citizen: The Contributions of Elinor Ostrom to “Civic Studies.” The Good Society, 20(1), 3–15.Google Scholar

Levine, P. (2014). The Case for Civic Studies. In Levine, P. and Soltan, K., eds., Civic Studies: Approaches to the Emerging Field, American Association of Colleges & Universities, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

Levine, P., and Soltan, K., (Eds.). (2014). Civic Studies: Approaches to the Emerging Field, American Association of Colleges & Universities.Google Scholar

Levy, J. T. (2015). Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, P. A. (2011). Varieties of Emergence: Minds, Markets and Novelty. Studies in Emergent Order. 4, 170–92.Google Scholar

Link, A. (2007). Public Policy and Entrepreneurship. In Audretsch, D., Grilo, I., and Thurik, A. R., eds., Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 130–139.Google Scholar

Macedo, S. (1990). Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Marwell, G., and Oliver, P. (1993). The Critical Mass in Collective Action, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marwell, G., Oliver, P., and Prahl, R. (1988). Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 502–534.Google Scholar

McGinnis, M. D. (1999). Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

McGinnis, M. D. (2005). Self-Governance, Polycentrism, and Federalism: Recurring Themes in Vincent Ostrom’s Scholarly Oeuvre. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57(2): 173–188.Google Scholar

McGinnis, M. D., and Walker, J. M. (2010). Foundations of the Ostrom Workshop: Institutional Analysis, Polycentricity, and Self-Governance of the Commons. Public Choice, 143(3): 293–301.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1948). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty, Ontario: Batoche Books Limited.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (1984). Anarchism, London: JM Dent.Google Scholar

Mises, L. (1920). Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. In Hayek, F. A., ed., Collective Economic Planning, London: George Routledge & Sons, pp. 87–130.Google Scholar

Mises, L. (1922). Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, New York: Mcmillan Co.Google Scholar

Mises, L. (1998). Human Action, Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Morris, C. (2002). An Essay on the Modern State, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morris, C. (2008). State Legitimacy and Social Order. In Kühnelt, J., ed., Political Legitimization Without Morality? Springer Netherlands, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar

Munger, M. (2010). Endless Forms Most Beautiful and Most Wonderful: Elinor Ostrom and the Diversity of Institutions. Public Choice, 143(3): 263–268.Google Scholar

Murphy, R. P. (2002). Chaos Theory, Auburn, AL: The Ludwig Von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. A. (1953). The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

North, D. C. (1993). Institutions and Credible Commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 149(1), 11–23.Google Scholar

North, D. C. (1997). Some Fundamental Puzzles in Economic History/Development. In Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity-Proceedings, Vol. 27, Addison-Wesley Publishing, pp. 223–238.Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, G. P., and Rizzo, M. J. (1985). The Economics of Time and Ignorance, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oliver, P. (1993). Formal Models of Collective Action. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 271–300.Google Scholar

Oliver, P., and Marwell, G. (1988). The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II. American Sociological Review, 53(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, P., and Marwell, G. (2001). Whatever Happened to Critical Mass Theory? A Retrospective and Assessment. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 292–311.Google Scholar

Oliver, P., Marwell, G., and Teixeira, R. (1985). A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 522–556.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ortmann, A. (1996). Modem Economic Theory and the Study of Nonprofit Organizations: Why the Twain Shall Meet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(4), 470–484.Google Scholar

Osterfeld, D. (1989). Anarchism and the Public Goods Issue: Law, Courts, and the Police. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 9(1), 47–68.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1965). Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management, Los Angeles, University of California. Retrieved from https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/3581Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1972). Metropolitan Reform: Propositions Derived from Two Traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53(3), 474–493.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (Ed). (1982). Strategies of Political Inquiry, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1986). An Agenda for the Study of Institutions. Public Choice 48(1): 3–25.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1991). Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Towards Complementarity. American Political Science Review, 85(1), 237–250.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1994). Neither Market Nor State: Governance of Common-Pool Resources in the Twenty-First Century, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1998). A Behavioural Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2005a). Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2005b). Unlocking Public Entrepreneurship and Public Economies. Discussion Paper No. 2005/1, EGDI-WIDER Conference on Unlocking Human Potential – Linking the Informal and Formal Sectors, Helsinki, 17–18 Sept. Retrieved from https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/dp2005-01.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2008). Developing a Method for Analyzing Institutional Change. In Batie, S. S. and Mercuro, N., eds., Alternative Institutional Structures: Evolution and Impact, New York: Routledge, pp. 48–76.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2014). Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235–252.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2016). The Comparative Study of Public Economies. American Economist, 61(1), 91–107.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and Ahn, T. K. (2007). The Meaning of Social Capital and its Link to Collective Action. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1304823 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1304823Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and Davis, G. (1993). Nonprofit Organizations as Alternatives and Complements in a Mixed Economy. In Hammack, D. C. and Young, D. R., eds., Nonprofit Organization in a Market Economy: Understanding New Roles, Issues, and Trends, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 23–56.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and Ostrom, V. (2004). The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(1), 105–147.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and Parks, R. B. (1973). Neither Gargantua nor the Land of Lilliputs: Conjectures on Mixed Systems of Metropolitan Organization. In McGinnis, M. D., ed., Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 284–305.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., and Walker, J. (Eds.). (2003). Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1972). Polycentricity. Workshop Working Paper Series, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, Sept. 5–9.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1979). A Conceptual-Computational Logic for Federal Systems of Governance. In Daniel, D. J., ed., Constitutional Design and Power-Sharing in the Post-Modern Epoch, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 2–22.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1982). The Human Condition. In Indiana University Archives, Vol. 82, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1984). The Meaning of Value Terms. American Behavioral Scientist, 28(2), 249–262.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1986). The Constitutional Level of Analysis: A Challenge. Bloomington: Workshop Working Paper Series, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1987). The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1990). Problems of Cognition as a Challenge to Policy Analysts and Democratic Societies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2(3): 243–262.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1993). Opportunity, Diversity, and Complexity. In Ostrom, V., Feeny, D., and Picht, H., eds., Rethinking Institutional Analysis and Development: Issues, Alternatives, and Choices, San Francisco: ICS Press, Institute for Contemporary Studies, pp. 389–407.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1994). The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Governing Society, San Francisco, Calif: ICS Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1997). The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (2006). Citizen-Sovereigns: The Source of Contestability, the Rule of Law, and the Conduct of Public Entrepreneurship. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 13–17.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (2008 [1973]). The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, 3rd edition [1st ed. 1973; rev. ed. 1974; 2nd ed. 1989], Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V., and Allen, B. (2008). The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment, 3rd revised edition, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V., and Ostrom, E. (1965). A Behavioral Approach to the Study of Intergovernmental Relations. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, 359(1), 135–146.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V., and Ostrom, E. (1977). Public Goods and Public Choices. In McGinnis, M., translator, Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 75–105.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V., Bish, R., and Ostrom, E. (1988). Local Government in the United States, San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., and Warren, R. (1961). The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.Google Scholar

Ott, J. S. (Ed.). (2001). The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Page, S. E. (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., … Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.Google Scholar

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pennington, M. (2011). Robust Political Economy: Classical Liberalism and the Future of Public Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Traditional Sharing Norms as an Obstacle to Economic Growth in Tribal Societies. (Working Paper), Notre-Dame de la Paix, Sciences Economiques et Sociales. Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/fthnodapa/173.htmGoogle Scholar

Platteau, J.-P. (2000). Institutions, Social Norms and Economic Development, 1st edition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Routledge.Google Scholar

Platteau, J.-P. (2006). Solidarity Norms and Institutions in Village Societies: Static and Dynamic Considerations. In Kolm, S.-C. and Ythier, J. M., eds., Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Vol. 1, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 819–886.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (2016). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pohl, R., (Ed.). (2004). Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement, and Memory, New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1951). The Logic of Liberty, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Posner, E. A. (Ed.). (2007). Social Norms, Nonlegal Sanctions, and the Law, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. (1998). Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics, and the Law. Stanford Law Review, 1551–1575.Google Scholar

Powell, W., and Steinberg, R. (2006). The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Pressman, J. L., and Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Pryor, F. L. (2005). Economic Systems of Foraging, Agricultural, and Industrial Societies, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., and Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Radnitzky, G. (Ed.). (1992). Universal Economics: Assessing the Achievements of the Economic Approach, New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Radnitzky, G., and Bernholz, P. (1987). Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics, New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar

Raiser, M. (1997). Informal Institutions, Social Capital and Economic Transition: Reflections on a Neglected Dimension. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.194.8230&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar

Raiser, M. (2001). Informal Institutions, Social Capital, and Economic Transition: Reflections on a Neglected Dimension. In Cornia, G. A. and Popov, V., eds., Transition and Institutions: The Experience of Gradual and Late Reformers, Oxford University Press, pp. 218–239.Google Scholar

Reksulak, M., Razzolini, L., and Shughart, W. F. (Eds.). (2013). The Elgar Companion to Public Choice, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. (Ed.). (1986). The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1997). Altruism, Ideological Entrepreneurs and the Non-Profit Firm. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 120–134.Google Scholar

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.Google Scholar

Rothbard, M. N. (1973). For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar

Rothbard, M. N., and Salerno, J. T. (2011). Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market, Scholar’s Edition, 2nd edition, Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Sabetti, F. (2011). Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity: Elinor Ostrom, Vincent Ostrom, and the Workshop. The Good Society, 20(1), 73–83.Google Scholar

Sabetti, F. (2014). Artisans of the Common Life: Building a Public Science of Civics. In Levine, P. and Soltan, K., eds., Civic Studies: Approaches to the Emerging Field, Vol. 3, Washington, DC: Bringing Theory to Practice, pp. 23–32.Google Scholar

Sabetti, F., Allen, B., and Sproule-Jones, M. (Eds.). (2009). The Practice of Constitutional Development: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs, New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government–Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1–2), 29–49.Google Scholar

Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government–Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248.Google Scholar

Salamon, L. M., Sokołowski, C. W., and Anheier, H. K. (2000). Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar

Schmidtz, D. (1995). Rational Choice and Moral Agency, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidtz, D. (2006). The Elements of Justice, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidtz, D., and Brennan, J. (2011). A Brief History of Liberty, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. (1954). History of Economic Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Selgin, G. (1988). Praxeology and Understanding: An Analysis of the Controversy in Austrian Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1970). The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy, 78(1), 152–157.Google Scholar

Shackle, G. L. S. (1973). Epistemics and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, R. Y., and Bloch‐Elkon, Y. (2008). Do the Facts Speak for Themselves? Partisan Disagreement as a Challenge to Democratic Competence. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 20(1–2), 115–139.Google Scholar

Shockley, G. E. (Ed.). (2009). Non-Market Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty Before Liberalism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, S. R., and Grønbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and Theory of Government–Nonprofit Relations. In Powell, W. W. and Steinberg, R., eds., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd edition, pp. 221–242.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. (2003). Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics. The American Economic Review, 93(3), 465–508.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. (2008). Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Soltan, K. (2011). A Civic Science. The Good Society, 20(1), 102–119.Google Scholar

Sproule-Jones, M., Allen, B., and Sabetti, F. (Eds.). (2008). The Struggle to Constitute and Sustain Productive Orders, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R. (2003). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations. In Anheier, H. K. and Ben-Ner, A., eds., The Study of Nonprofit Enterprise, New York: Springer US, pp. 277–309.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R., and Gray, B. H. (1993). The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(4), 297–316.Google Scholar

Steinberg, R., and Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (2006). The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd edition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, G. J., and Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar

Storr, V. (2008). North’s Underdeveloped Ideological Entrepreneur, in Chamlee-Wright, E., ed., Annual Proceedings of the Wealth and Well-Being of Nations, Vol. 1, Beloit, WI: Beloit College Press, pp. 2008–2009.Google Scholar

Storr, V. H., Haeffele-Balch, S., and Grube, L. E. (2015). Community Revival in the Wake of Disaster: Lessons in Local Entrepreneurship, New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar

Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and Sociology: Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. The American Economic Review, 93(2), 175–179.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, revised and expanded edition, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. (2013). Smarter Than You Think: How Technology is Changing Our Minds for the Better, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., and Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Bounding Rationality to the World. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(2), 143–165.Google Scholar

Tomasi, J. (2012). Free Market Fairness. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Toonen, T. (2010). Resilience in Public Administration: The Work of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom from a Public Administration Perspective. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 193–202.Google Scholar

Tully, J. (2013). Two Ways of Realizing Justice and Democracy: Linking Amartya Sen and Elinor Ostrom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(2), 220–232.Google Scholar

Valentinov, V., and Iliopoulos, C. (2013). Economic Theories of Nonprofits and Agricultural Cooperatives Compared: New Perspectives for Nonprofit Scholars. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 109–126.Google Scholar

van de Haar, E. (2009). Classical Liberalism and International Relations Theory: Hume, Smith, Mises, and Hayek, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

van de Haar, E. (2015). Degrees of Freedom: Liberal Political Philosophy and Ideology, New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Vanberg, V. J. (2002). The Constitution of Markets: Essays in Political Economy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Vanberg, V. J. (2005). Market and State: The Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(01), 23–49.Google Scholar

Wagner, R. E. (1966). Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Article. Papers on Non- Market Decision Making, 1(12), 161–170.Google Scholar

Wagner, R. E., (Ed.). (2016). Politics as a Peculiar Business: Insights from a Theory of Entangled Political Economy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Walker, J. (2012, June 12). Elinor Ostrom, Scholar Who Argued for Decentralization, RIP. Hit & Run Blog at Reason.com, retrieved from http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/12/elinor-ostrom-scholar-who-maGoogle Scholar

Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Nonprofit Sector in a Three-Sector Economy. In Phelps, E. S., ed., Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 171–196.Google Scholar

Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Co.Google Scholar

Weisbrod, B. A. (1991). The Nonprofit Economy, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative Models of Government–Nonprofit Sector Relations: Theoretical and International Perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.Google Scholar

Young, D. R. (2013). If Not for Profit, for What? A Behavioral Theory of the Nonprofit Sector Based on Entrepreneurship (1983 print edition), Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar