Book contents
- Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing
- Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on the Texts
- Introduction
- 1 Metaphysical Foundations
- 2 Evil as Privation
- 3 Aquinas’s Account of Moral Wrongdoing
- 4 Aquinas’s Account of Moral Wrongdoing
- 5 Aquinas’s Account of Moral Wrongdoing
- 6 The Vices in Aquinas’s Moral Psychology
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2017
Book contents
- Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing
- Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on the Texts
- Introduction
- 1 Metaphysical Foundations
- 2 Evil as Privation
- 3 Aquinas’s Account of Moral Wrongdoing
- 4 Aquinas’s Account of Moral Wrongdoing
- 5 Aquinas’s Account of Moral Wrongdoing
- 6 The Vices in Aquinas’s Moral Psychology
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing , pp. 179 - 194Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Primary Sources
Aquinas, Thomas. Opera omnia, ed. by Leonine Commission (Rome: Vatican Polyglot Press, 1882–). Accessed at Corpus Thomisticum website: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum, ed. by Mandonnet, O.P. R. P. (Paris: Sumptibus P. Lethielleux, 1929).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra gentiles, ed. by Pera, O.P. Ceslai (Taurini: Marietti, 1961).Google Scholar
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severimus. De Consolatione Philosophiae, ed. by Moreschini, Claudio (München: K.G. Saur, 2000).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Disputed Questions on the Virtues, ed. by Atkins, E. M. and Williams, Thomas (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil, ed. by Davies, Brian, trans. by Regan, Richard (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil, trans. by Oesterle, John A. and Oesterle, Jean T. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Contra Gentiles, 4 vols. Book 3, part 1, trans. by Bourke, Vernon J. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologica, trans. by the English Dominican Fathers, 1911 (reprint, Allen, TX: Christian Classics, 1981).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Truth, 3 vols. Vol. 3, trans. by Schmidt, S.J. Robert W., 1954 (reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1994).Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Cassian, John. Collationes, trans. by Ramsey, Boniface (New York: Paulist Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, and Luther, Martin. Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation, ed. and trans. by Rupp, E. Gordon, Marlow, A. N., Watson, Philip S., and Drewery, B. (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Evagrius, . Evagrius of Pontus the Greek Ascetic Corpus, trans. by Sinkewicz, Robert E. (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gregory, . Moralia in Iob, trans. by Bliss, James (Oxford, UK: J.H. Parker, 1844–1850).Google Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Lost, ed. by Orgel, Stephen and Goldberg, Jonathan (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Aquinas, Thomas. Opera omnia, ed. by Leonine Commission (Rome: Vatican Polyglot Press, 1882–). Accessed at Corpus Thomisticum website: www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum, ed. by Mandonnet, O.P. R. P. (Paris: Sumptibus P. Lethielleux, 1929).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra gentiles, ed. by Pera, O.P. Ceslai (Taurini: Marietti, 1961).Google Scholar
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severimus. De Consolatione Philosophiae, ed. by Moreschini, Claudio (München: K.G. Saur, 2000).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Disputed Questions on the Virtues, ed. by Atkins, E. M. and Williams, Thomas (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil, ed. by Davies, Brian, trans. by Regan, Richard (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil, trans. by Oesterle, John A. and Oesterle, Jean T. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Contra Gentiles, 4 vols. Book 3, part 1, trans. by Bourke, Vernon J. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologica, trans. by the English Dominican Fathers, 1911 (reprint, Allen, TX: Christian Classics, 1981).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Truth, 3 vols. Vol. 3, trans. by Schmidt, S.J. Robert W., 1954 (reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1994).Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Cassian, John. Collationes, trans. by Ramsey, Boniface (New York: Paulist Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, and Luther, Martin. Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation, ed. and trans. by Rupp, E. Gordon, Marlow, A. N., Watson, Philip S., and Drewery, B. (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Evagrius, . Evagrius of Pontus the Greek Ascetic Corpus, trans. by Sinkewicz, Robert E. (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gregory, . Moralia in Iob, trans. by Bliss, James (Oxford, UK: J.H. Parker, 1844–1850).Google Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Lost, ed. by Orgel, Stephen and Goldberg, Jonathan (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Adams, Don. “Loving God ‘and’ One’s Neighbor: Thomistic Charity.” Faith & Philosophy 11 (1994): 207–23.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord, and Adams, Robert Merrihew, eds. The Problem of Evil (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A., and Speer, Andreas, eds. Was Ist Philosophie Im Mittelalter? (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998).Google Scholar
Alexander, William M. “Sex and Philosophy in Augustine.” Augustinian Studies 5 (1974): 197–208.Google Scholar
Anglin, Bill, and Goetz, Stewart. “Evil Is Privation.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1982): 3–12.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” In Collected Papers, vol. 3 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Penguin Classics, 1994).Google Scholar
Balmain, Colette, and Drawmer, Lois, eds. Something Wicked This Way Comes: Essays on Evil and Human Wickedness (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2009).Google Scholar
Barad, Judith. “Aquinas’s Assent/Consent Distinction and the Problem of Akrasia.” The New Scholasticism 62 (1988): 98–111.Google Scholar
Barnwell, Michael. “Aquinas’s Two Different Accounts of Akrasia.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2010): 49–67.Google Scholar
Barton, Richard E. “Gendering Anger: Ira, Furor, and Discourses of Power and Masculinity in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries.” In In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages, ed. by Newhauser, Richard (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005), pp. 371–92.Google Scholar
Beaty, Michael D. Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Bejczy, István P., ed. Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Blanchette, Oliva. “The Four Causes as Texture of the Universe.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 25 (1969): 59–87.Google Scholar
Boler, John. “Aquinas on Exceptions in Natural Law.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory, ed. by MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore (Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press, 1999), pp. 161–204.Google Scholar
Bowlin, John. Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas’s Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bowlin, John. “Psychology and Theodicy in Aquinas.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 7 (1998): 129–56.Google Scholar
Bradley, Denis J. M. Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Braine, David. “The Active and Potential Intellects: Aquinas as a Philosopher in His Own Right.” In Mind, Metaphysics, and Value in the Thomistic and Analytical Traditions, ed. by Haldane, John (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002), pp. 18–35.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. Action and Conduct: Thomas Aquinas and the Theory of Action (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998).Google Scholar
Burrell, David B. Aquinas: God and Action (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Burrell, David B. Freedom and Creation in Three Traditions (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Butera, Giuseppe. “On Reason’s Control of the Passions in Aquinas’s Theory of Temperance.” Mediaeval Studies 68 (2006): 133–60.Google Scholar
Calder, Todd C. “Is the Privation Theory of Evil Dead?” American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2007): 371–81.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. Setting the Moral Compass: Essays by Women Philosophers (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil. “Desert Mothers: Women Ascetics in Early Christian Egypt.” In Women as Teachers and Disciples in Traditional and New Religions, ed. by Puttick, Elizabeth and Clarke, Peter B. (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1993), pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Chanderbhan, Stephen. “‘That Your Joy May Be Full’: Emotions in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University (2012).Google Scholar
Charles, Sonya. “How Should Feminist Autonomy Theorists Respond to the Problem of Internalized Oppression?” Social Theory and Practice 36 (2010): 409–28.Google Scholar
Childress, Marianne Miller. “Efficient Causality in Human Actions.” The Modern Schoolman 28 (1951): 191–222.Google Scholar
Colvert, Gavin T. “Aquinas on Raising Cain: Vice, Incontinence and Responsibility.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (1997, Suppl.): 203–20.Google Scholar
Cook, Edward. The Deficient Cause of Moral Evil According to Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Paideia Publishers and the Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 1996).Google Scholar
Crasnow, Sharon L., and Superson, Anita M., eds. Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Cress, Donald. “A Defense of Augustine’s Privation Account of Evil.” Augustinian Studies 20 (1989): 109–28.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Michael, ed. A Preserving Grace: Protestants, Catholics, and Natural Law (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997).Google Scholar
Crosby, John F. “Doubts about the Privation Theory That Will Not Go Away: Response to Patrick Lee.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2007): 489–505.Google Scholar
Crosby, John F. “How Is It Possible Knowingly to Do Wrong?” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 74 (2000): 325–33.Google Scholar
Crosby, John F. “Is All Evil Really Only Privation?” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 75 (2002): 197–209.Google Scholar
Curran, Charles E., and McCormick, S.J. Richard A., eds. Readings in Moral Theology, vol. 1 (New York: Paulist Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Davies, Brian, and Stump, Eleonore, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
De Wijze, Stephen. “Defining Evil: Insights from the Problem of ‘Dirty Hands.’” The Monist 85 (2002): 210–38.Google Scholar
DeCoursey, Mary Edwin. The Theory of Evil in the Metaphysics of St. Thomas and Its Contemporary Significance (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence “The Real Distinction between Intellect and Will.” Angelicum 57 (1980): 557–93.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence “St. Thomas and the First Cause of Moral Evil.” In Wisdom, Law, and Virtue (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008), pp. 186–96.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “Aquinas on the Vice of Sloth: Three Interpretive Issues.” The Thomist 75 (2011): 43–64.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. Glittering Vices: A New Look at the Seven Deadly Sins and Their Remedies (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2009).Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Glory: Aquinas on the Forgotten Vice of Vainglory.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M. V. ( Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 101–25.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “Resistance to the Demands of Love: Aquinas on the Vice of Acedia.” The Thomist 68 (2004): 173–204.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “The Roots of Despair.” Res Philosophica 92 (2015): 829–54.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “The Vice of Sloth: Some Historical Reflections on Laziness, Effort, and Resistance to the Demands of Love.” In Virtues and Their Vices, ed. by Timpe, Kevin and Boyd, Craig A. (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 177–98.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk, McCluskey, Colleen, and van Dyke, Christina. Aquinas’s Ethics: Metaphysical Foundations, Moral Theory, and Theological Context (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Di Blasi, Fulvio, Hochschild, Joshua P., and Langan, Jeffrey, eds. Virtue’s End: God in the Moral Philosophy of Aristotle and Aquinas (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Doolan, Gregory. “The Relation of Culture and Ignorance to Culpability in Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 63 (1999): 105–24.Google Scholar
Dougherty, M. V., ed. Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Downing, Andrew “Sin and Its Relevance to Human Nature in the Summa Theologiae.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009): 793–805.Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter S. “Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will.” Review of Metaphysics 56 (2003): 835–62.Google Scholar
Eckel, M. David, and Herling, Bradley L., eds. Deliver Us from Evil (New York: Continuum Books, 2008).Google Scholar
Elders, Leo. “The Aristotelian Commentaries of St. Thomas Aquinas.” Review of Metaphysics 63 (2009): 29–53.Google Scholar
Emery, G. “Brief Catalogue of the Works of Saint Thomas Aquinas.” In Saint Thomas Aquinas: The Person and His Work, 2nd edn. by Torrell, O.P. Jean-Pierre, trans. by Royal, Robert (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2005), pp. 330–61.Google Scholar
Emery, Kent, Friedman, Russell, and Speer, Andreas, eds. Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages: A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. “Can I Choose Who I Am? And How Would That Empower Me? Gender, Race, Identities and the Self.” In Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd edn., ed. by Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 108–26.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I., ed. The Legacy of Greece: A New Appraisal (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Flannery, Kevin L. Acts amid Precepts: The Aristotelian Logical Structure of Thomas Aquinas’s Moral Theory (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Flannery, Kevin L. “The Division of Action in Thomas Aquinas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2009): 421–40.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kevin L. “The Field of Moral Action According to Thomas Aquinas.” The Thomist 69 (2005): 1–30.Google Scholar
Flood, Anthony T. The Root of Friendship: Self-Love and Self-Governance in Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Floyd, Shawn D. “Aquinas on Emotion: A Response to Some Recent Interpretations.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (1998): 161–75.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. “Silence and Institutional Prejudice.” In Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy, ed. by Crasnow, Sharon L. and Superson, Anita M. (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda, and Hornsby, Jennifer, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Fry-Revere, Sigrid. “Ontic Evil: How St. Thomas Understood It, and How Some Contemporary Authors Have Deviated from His Meaning.” Kinesis 17 (1987): 56–86.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “Aquinas on Goodness and Moral Goodness.” In Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy, ed. by Gallagher, David M (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1994), pp. 37–60.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas.” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 76 (1994): 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “The Role of God in the Philosophical Ethics of Thomas Aquinas.” In Miscellanea Mediaevalia: Was Ist Philosophie Im Mittelalter?, ed. by Aertsen, Jan A. and Speer, Andreas (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998), pp. 1024–33.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “Thomas Aquinas on the Will as Rational Appetite.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 559–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “The Will and Its Acts (Ia IIae, qq. 6–17).” In The Ethics of Aquinas, ed. by Pope, Stephen J. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002), pp. 69–89.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M., ed. Thomas Aquinas and His Legacy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Garry, Ann, and Pearsall, Marilyn, eds. Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd edn. (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
George, Robert P. In Defense of Natural Law (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobodo-Madikizela, Pumla. A Human Being Died That Night (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004).Google Scholar
Gondreau, Paul. “The Passions and the Moral Life: Appreciating the Originality of Aquinas.” The Thomist 71 (2007): 419–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyette, John, Latkovic, Mark, and Myers, Richard S, eds. St. Thomas Aquinas and the Natural Law Tradition: Contemporary Perspectives (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. “The Transcendentals in the Middle Ages: An Introduction.” Topoi 11(1992): 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. Matthews. “Aquinas among Libertarians and Compatibilists: Breaking the Logic of Theological Determinism.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75 (2001): 221–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain, Boyle, Joseph, and Finnis, John. “Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1987): 99–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenhout, Ruth E. Connected Lives: Human Nature and an Ethics of Care (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).Google Scholar
Haldane, John. ed. Mind, Metaphysics, and Value in the Thomistic and Analytical Traditions (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Hall, Pamela M. Narrative and the Natural Law: An Interpretation of Thomistic Ethics (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hanink, James G., ed. Aquinas and Maritain on Evil: Mystery and Metaphysics (Washington, DC: American Maritain Association Publications, distributed by Catholic University of America Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Harmless, William. Desert Christians: An Introduction to the Literature of Early Monasticism (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. “Objective Reality, Male Reality, and Social Construction.” In Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd edn., ed. by Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 84–107.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Aquinas on Non-Voluntary Acts.” International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2006): 459–75.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Review of Aquinas’s Ethics: Metaphysical Foundations, Moral Theory, and Theological Context.” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 93 (2011): 110–14.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists” (1997). Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997): 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Voluntariness and Causality: Some Problems for Aquinas’ Theory of Responsibility.” Vivarium 36 (1998): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haybron, Daniel M., ed. Earth’s Abominations: Philosophical Studies of Evil (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hittinger, Russell. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Aquinas on the Moral Progress of the Weak Willed.” In Das Problem der Willensschwäche in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie, ed. by Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias (Leuven: Peeters, 2006), pp. 221–47.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 17 (2006): 71–92.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias., ed. Weakness of Will from Plato to the Present (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, and Furlong, Peter. “Free Choice.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M. V. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 56–74.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias, eds. Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias. Das problem der Willensschwäche in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie (Leuven: Peeters, 2006).Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel, ed. The Evidential Argument from Evil (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Inagaki, Bernard Ryosuke. “Habitus and Natura in Aquinas.” In Studies in Medieval Philosophy, ed. by Wippel, John F. (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1987), pp. 159–75.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. “Aquinas, Natural Law, and Aristotelian Eudaimonism.” In The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, ed. by Kraut, Richard (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 323–41.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. “Aristotle’s Conception of Morality.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 1 (1985): 115–43.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. “Will, Responsibility, and Ignorance: Aristotelian Accounts of Incontinence.” In Das Problem der Willensschwäche in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie, ed. by Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias (Leuven: Peeters, 2006), pp. 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology.” Inquiry (Oslo) 32 (1989): 151–76; reprinted in Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd edn., ed. by Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 166–90.Google Scholar
Janssens, Louis. “Ontic Evil and Moral Evil.” In Readings in Moral Theology, vol. 1, ed. by Curran, Charles E. and McCormick, S.J. Richard A. (New York: Paulist Press, 1979), pp. 40–93.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Fiona, and Hutchison, Katrina, eds. Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven J. Good and Evil Actions: A Journey through Saint Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Steven J. “Venial Sin and the Ultimate End.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M. V. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 75–100.Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark. “Ideals of Scientia Moralis and the Invention of the Summa Theologiae.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, ed. by MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 79–97.Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark. “Thomas as Commentator in Some Programs of Neo-Thomism: A Reply to Kaczor.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2004): 379–86.Google Scholar
Jordan-Smith, Paul. “Seven (and More) Deadly Sins.” Parabola 10 (1985): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczor, Christopher. “Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on the Ethics: Merely an Interpretation of Aristotle?” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2004): 353–78.Google Scholar
Kane, G. Stanley. “Evil and Privation.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (1980): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, James F. “The Problem with Thomas Aquinas’s Concept of Sin.” Heythrop Journal 35 (1994): 401–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. “Happiness.” In Moral Concepts, ed. by Feinberg, Joel (Oxford University Press, 1970), pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Aquinas and Weakness of Will.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2007): 70–91.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Evil in Later Medieval Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Habits and Virtues.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, ed. by Pope, Stephen J. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002), pp. 116–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “On the Track of Lust: Luxuria, Ockham, and the Scientists.” In In the Garden of Evil, ed. by Newhauser, Richard (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005), pp. 349–55.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Transitory Vice: Thomas Aquinas on Incontinence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989): 199–223.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie, and Dressel, Ashley. “Weakness and Willful Wrongdoing in Aquinas’s De malo. ” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M. V. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 34–55.Google Scholar
Kim, Yul. “A Change in Thomas Aquinas’s Theory of the Will: Solutions to a Long-Standing Problem.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2008): 221–36.Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Aquinas on the Passions.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory, ed. by MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore (Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press, 1999), pp. 101–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivy, Peter. “Melville’s ‘Billy’ and the Secular Problem of Evil: The Worm in the Bud.” The Monist 63 (1980): 480–93.Google Scholar
Klubertanz, George P. Habits and Virtues (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klubertanz, George P. “The Root of Freedom in St. Thomas’s Later Works.” Gregorianum 52 (1961): 701–21.Google Scholar
Koritansky, Peter Karl. Thomas Aquinas and the Philosophy of Punishment (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Kraut, Richard, ed. The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. “God among the Causes of Moral Evil: Hardening of Hearts and Spiritual Blinding.” Philosophical Topics 16 (1988): 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, and Stump, Eleonore, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoureux, Patricia A. “Deadly Vices and Redeeming Virtues: A Feminist Perspective.” New Theology Review 8 (1995): 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langan, John “Egoism and Morality in the Theological Teleology of Thomas Aquinas.” Journal of Philosophical Research 16 (1990–91): 411–26.Google Scholar
Langan, John “Sins of Malice in the Moral Psychology of Thomas Aquinas.” In The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics, ed. by Yeager, D. M. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1987), pp. 179–98.Google Scholar
Lara, María Pía. “Narrating Evil: A Postmetaphysical Theory of Reflective Judgment.” In Rethinking Evil: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Lara, María Pia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), pp. 239–50.Google Scholar
Lara, María Pía, ed. Rethinking Evil: Contemporary Perspectives (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Larrimore, Mark. “Evil as Privation: Seeing Darkness, Hearing Silence.” In Deliver Us from Evil, ed. by Eckel, M. David and Herling, Bradley L. (New York: Continuum Books, 2008), pp. 149–65.Google Scholar
Lawler, Michael. “Grace and Free Will in Justification: A Textual Study in Aquinas.” The Thomist 35 (1971): 601–30.Google Scholar
Lee, Patrick. “Evil as Such Is a Privation: A Reply to John Crosby.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2007): 469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Patrick. “The Goodness of Creation, Evil, and Christian Teaching.” The Thomist 64 (2000): 239–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Patrick. “The Relationship between Intellect and Will in Free Choice According to Aquinas and Scotus.” The Thomist 49 (1985): 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leget, Carlo. “Martha Nussbaum and Thomas Aquinas on the Emotions.” Theological Studies 64 (2003): 558–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisska, Anthony J. Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. “Feminism in History of Philosophy: Appropriating the Past.” In The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy, ed. by Fricker, Miranda and Hornsby, Jennifer (Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 245–63.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Nicholas E. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Loughran, Thomas J. “Aquinas, Compatibilist.” In Human and Divine Agency: Anglican, Catholic, and Lutheran Perspectives, ed. by McLain, F. Michael and Richardson, W. Mark (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias, and Fidora, Alexander, eds. Handlung und Wissenschaft: die Epistemologie der praktischen Wissenschaften im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Akademie, 2008).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Aquinas’s Libertarian Account of Free Choice.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 52 (1998): 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Egoistic Rationalism: Aquinas’s Basis for Christian Morality.” In Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy, ed. by Beaty, Michael D. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990), pp. 327–54.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Practical Reasoning and Reasons-Explanations: Aquinas’s Account of Reason’s Role in Action.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory, ed. by MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 133–60.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “The Relation between Being and Goodness.” In Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology, ed. by MacDonald, Scott (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Theory of Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, ed. by Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleonore (Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 160–95.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Ultimate Ends in Practical Reasoning: Aquinas’s Aristotelian Moral Psychology and Anscombe’s Fallacy.” Philosophical Review 100 (1991): 31–66.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott, ed. Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Scott, and Stump, Eleonore, eds. Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair C. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Mann, William E. “Augustine on Evil and Original Sin.” In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, ed. by Stump, Eleonore and Kretzmann, Norman (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 40–48.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Richard K. “Antecedent Passion and the Moral Quality of Human Acts According to St. Thomas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (1997, Suppl.): 221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshner, William H. “Aquinas on the Evaluation of Human Actions.” The Thomist 59 (1995): 347–70.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Happiness and Freedom in Aquinas’s Theory of Action.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 9 (2000): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Intellective Appetite and the Freedom of Human Action.” The Thomist 66 (2002): 421–56.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Thomas Aquinas and the Epistemology of Moral Wrongdoing.” In Handlung und Wissenschaft: die Epistemologie der praktischen Wissenschaften im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert, ed. by Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias and Fidora, Alexander (Berlin: Akademie, 2009), pp. 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “An Unequal Relationship between Equals: Thomas Aquinas on Marriage.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 24 (2007): 1–18.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Willful Wrongdoing: Thomas Aquinas on certa malitia.” Studies in the History of Ethics 6 (2005): 1–54.Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph M. Aquinas on Human Action: A Theory of Practice (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1992).Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph M. Ethica Thomistica: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1982, 1997).Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph M. “The Principles of Natural Law.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 25 (1980): 1–15.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Christine. Character, Virtue Theories, and the Vices (Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLain, F. Michael, and Richardson, W. Mark, eds. Human and Divine Agency: Anglican, Catholic, and Lutheran Perspectives (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999).Google Scholar
Merken, Paul. “Transformations of the Ethics of Aristotle in the Moral Philosophy of Thomas.” L’agire morale (Napoli: Edizioni domenicane italiane, 1977), pp. 151–62.Google Scholar
Milbank, John. “Darkness and Silence: Evil and the Western Legacy.” In The Religious, ed. by Caputo, John D. (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002), pp. 277–300.Google Scholar
Miner, Robert C. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions: A Study of Summa Theologiae, 1a2ae 22–48 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody-Adams, Michele M. “The Idea of Moral Progress.” Metaphilosophy 30 (1999): 168–85; reprinted in Setting the Moral Compass: Essays by Women Philosophers, ed. by Calhoun, Cheshire (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 256–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Dermot. “Moral Evil: St. Thomas and the Thomists.” Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 9 (1959): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Claudia Eisen. “Aquinas on Voluntary Beliefs.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 569–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. Natural Law and Practical Rationality (Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash-Marshall, Siobhan. “Is Evil Really an Ontological ‘Privative’?” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79 (2006): 157–71.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan. Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Newhauser, Richard, ed. In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005).Google Scholar
Newhauser, Richard, and Ridyard, Susan J., eds. Sin in Medieval and Early Modern Culture: The Tradition of the Seven Deadly Sins (Suffolk, UK: Boydell & Brewer [York Medieval Press], 2012).Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun. “Norms with Feeling: Towards a Psychological Account of Moral Judgment.” Cognition 84 (2002): 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noddings, Nel. Women and Evil (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Rourke, Fran. “Evil as Privation: The Neoplatonic Background to Aquinas’s De malo.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M. V. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 192–221.Google Scholar
Olshewsky, Thomas. “Thomas’s Conception of Causation.” Nature and System 2 (1980): 101–22.Google Scholar
Osborne, Thomas M. “The Goodness and Evil of Objects and Ends.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M. V. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 126–45.Google Scholar
Osborne, Thomas M. Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Osborne, Thomas M. “Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus on Individual Acts and the Ultimate End.” In Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages: A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, ed. by Emery, Kent, Friedman, Russell, and Speer, Andreas (Leiden: Brill, 2011), pp. 351–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa theologiae 1a 75–89 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias. “Aquinas’s Interpretation of the Aristotelian Virtue of Justice and His Doctrine of Natural Law.” In Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, ed. by Bejczy, István P. (Leiden: Brill, 2008), pp. 131–50.Google Scholar
Pickavé, Martin, ed. Die logik des transzendentalen: Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003).Google Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinckaers, Servais. The Sources of Christian Ethics, trans. by Noble, Mary Thomas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Stephen J., ed. The Ethics of Aquinas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Jean. Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of the Natural Law (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005).Google Scholar
Price, Terry. “Mistakes of Fact and Agent Voluntariness: Aristotle, Aquinas, and Conformity to Will.” Modern Schoolman 80 (2003): 99–113.Google Scholar
Puttick, Elizabeth, and Clarke, Peter B, eds. Women as Teachers and Disciples in Traditional and New Religions (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, Alice. Dynamic Transcendentals: Truth, Goodness, and Beauty from a Thomistic Perspective (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “Beyond Privation: Moral Evil in Aquinas’s ‘De Malo.’” Review of Metaphysics 55 (2002): 751–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhonheimer, Martin. Natural Law and Practical Reason: A Thomist View of Moral Autonomy, trans. by Malsbary, Gerald (New York: Fordham University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, Martin. “The Perspective of the Acting Person and the Nature of Practical Reason: The ‘Object of the Human Act’ in Thomistic Anthropology of Action.” Nova et Vetera 2 (2004): 461–516.Google Scholar
Richardson, F. Michael, and McLain, W. Mark, eds. Human and Divine Agency: Anglican, Catholic, and Lutheran Perspectives (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999).Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. “From Passions to Emotions and Sentiments.” Philosophy 57 (1982): 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. “Culpability and Ignorance.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2003): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rota, Michael. “Causation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, ed. by Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Luke. “Is Evil Action Qualitatively Distinct from Ordinary Wrongdoing?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2007): 659–77.Google Scholar
Rziha, John. Perfecting Human Actions: St. Thomas Aquinas on Human Participation in Eternal Law (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, Risto. Weakness of the Will in Medieval Thought: From Augustine to Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 1994).Google Scholar
Sanford, Jonathan J. “On Vice and Free Choice.” In Aquinas and Maritain on Evil: Mystery and Metaphysics, ed. by Hanink, James G. (Washington, DC: American Maritain Association Publications, distributed by Catholic University of America Press, 2013), pp. 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. “Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy.” In Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, ed. by Jenkins, Fiona and Hutchison, Katrina (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Selling, Joseph A. “Looking Toward the End: Revisiting Aquinas’s Teleological Ethics.” Heythrop Journal 51 (2010): 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. “Commentary on Irwin,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 1 (1985): 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, Michael S. By Knowledge and by Love: Charity and Knowledge in the Moral Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singley, Bernestine, ed. When Race Becomes Real: Black and White Writers Confront Their Personal Histories (Chicago: Lawrence Hill, 2002).Google Scholar
Sprague, Rosamond Kent. “Negation and Evil.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (1951): 561–67.Google Scholar
Staley, Kevin M. “Aquinas: Compatibilist or Libertarian?” Saint Anselm Journal 2 (2005): 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Does Evil Have a Cause? Augustine’s Perplexity and Thomas’s Answer.” Review of Metaphysics 48 (1994): 251–73.Google Scholar
Stegman, Thomas D. “Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Problem of Akrasia.” Modern Schoolman 66 (1989): 117–28.Google Scholar
Stewart, Columba “Evagrius Ponticus and the ‘Eight Generic Logismoi.’” In In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages, ed. by Newhauser, Richard (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005), pp. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Still, Carl N., and Dahl, Darren E.. “Evil and Moral Failure in De malo.” In Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, ed. by Dougherty, M.V. (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 146–63.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael. “Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979): 738–53.Google Scholar
Straw, Carole. “Gregory, Cassian, and the Cardinal Vices.” In In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages, ed. by Newhauser, Richard (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005), pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays (London: Methuen, 1974), pp. 16–25.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Aquinas’s Account of Freedom: Intellect and Will.” The Monist 80 (1997): 576–97.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Beauty as a Road to God.” Sacred Music 134, no. 4 (2007): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics: Aquinas on the Passions.” Faith and Philosophy 28 (2011): 29–43.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Non-Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism without Reductionism.” Faith and Philosophy 12 (1995): 505–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. “Wisdom: Will, Belief, and Moral Goodness.” In Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, ed. by MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), pp. 28–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore, and Kretzmann, Norman. “Being and Goodness.” Reprinted in Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology, ed. by Macdonald, Scott (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), pp. 98–128.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore, and Kretzmann, Norman, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Swan, Laura. The Forgotten Desert Mothers: Sayings, Lives, and Stories of Early Christian Women (New York: Paulist Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, Eileen C. “Aquinas on the Seven Deadly Sins.” In Sin in Medieval and Early Modern Culture: The Tradition of the Seven Deadly Sins, ed. by Newhauser, Richard and Ridyard, Susan J (Suffolk, UK: Boydell & Brewer [York Medieval Press], 2012), pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
Thelakat, Paul. “Process and Privation: Aquinas and Whitehead on Evil.” International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1986): 287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Laurence Mordekhai. Vessels of Evil: American Slavery and the Holocaust (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpe, Kevin, and Boyd, Craig, eds. Virtues and Their Vices (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre Saint Thomas Aquinas: The Person and His Work, trans. by Royal, Robert (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uffenheimer-Lippens, Elisabeth. “Rationalized Passion and Passionate Rationality: Thomas Aquinas on the Relation between Reason and the Passions.” Review of Metaphysics 56 (2003): 525–58.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Lewis. Doing Ethics: Moral Reasoning and Contemporary Issues (New York: W.W. Norton, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, Candace A. “Equiano, Aquinas and the Problem of Constitutive Evil.” Topoi 18 (1999): 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, Candace A. Reasonably Vicious (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, James. Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing (Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. “Skepticism about Weakness of Will.” Philosophical Review 86 (1977): 316–39; reprinted in Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Alan. “The Problem of Evil beyond Theology.” In Something Wicked This Way Comes: Essays on Evil and Human Wickedness, ed. by Balmain, Colette and Drawmer, Lois (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2009), pp. 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wawrykow, Joseph P. God’s Grace and Human Action: “Merit” in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Westberg, Daniel. “Did Aquinas Change His Mind about the Will?” The Thomist 58 (1994): 41–60.Google Scholar
Westberg, Daniel. “Good and Evil in Human Acts.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, ed. by Pope, Stephen J. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002), pp. 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westberg, Daniel. Right Practical Reason: Aristotle, Action, and Prudence in Aquinas (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
White, Kevin. “The Passions of the Soul.” In The Ethics of Aquinas, ed. by Pope, Stephen J. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002), pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Whitney, Barry L., ed. Theodicy: An Annotated Bibliography on the Problem of Evil, 1960–1990 (New York: Garland, 1993).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “Philosophy.” In The Legacy of Greece: A New Appraisal, ed. by Finley, M. I. (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1981), pp. 202–55.Google Scholar
Williams, Bruce “The Capital Vices in Contemporary Discourse.” Angelicum 84 (2007): 29–47.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas. “Human Freedom and Agency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, ed. by Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 199–208.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas. “The Libertarian Foundations of Scotus’s Moral Philosophy.” The Thomist 62 (1998): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F., ed. Studies in Medieval Philosophy (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Wright, John H. “Human Freedom and Divine Action: Libertarianism in St. Thomas Aquinas.” In Human and Divine Agency: Anglican, Catholic, and Lutheran Perspectives, ed. by Richardson, F. Michael and McLain, W. Mark (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999), pp. 41–48.Google Scholar
Yancy, George. Black Bodies, White Gazes: The Continuing Significance of Race (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).Google Scholar
Yeager, D. M., ed. The Annual of the Soceity of Christian Ethics (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Zack, Naomi. White Privilege and Black Rights (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015).Google Scholar
Zoller, Coleen. “Determined but Free: Aquinas’s Compatibilist Theory of Freedom.” Philosophy and Theology 16 (2004): 25–44.Google Scholar