Works by Jürgen Habermas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon , pp. xxxiv - xliiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Habermas, J. 1954. Das Absolute und die Geschichte von der Zwiespältigkeit in Schellings Denken. Bonn: H. Bouvier.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1955a. “Comeback der deutschen Soziologie,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, July 23.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1955b. “Der Soziologen-Nachwuchs stellt sich vor. Zu einem Treffen in Hamburg unter der Leitung von Professor Schelsky,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 13: 10.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1956. “Philosophie, Besprechung von Karl Jaspers: Philosophie 3. Auflage,” Deutsche Universitätszeitung, 23–24: 29.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1960. Verrufener Fortschritt-Verkanntes Jahrhundert: Zur Kritik an der Geschichtsphilosophie, Merkur, Jg XIV.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1961. Student und Politik: eine soziologische Untersuchung zum politischen Bewusstsein Frankfurter Studenten. Neuwied am Rhein: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1963. “Dialektischer Idealismus im Übergang zum Materialismus: Geschichtsphilosophische Folgerungen aus Schellings Idee einer Contraction Gottes,” in Theorie und Praxis; Sozialphilosophische Studien. Neuwied am Rhein: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970a. Arbeit, Erkenntnis, Fortschritt. Aufsätze 1954–1970. Amsterdam: de Munter.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970b. “On Systematically Distorted Communication,” Inquiry 13: 205–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970c. Toward a Rational Society; Student Protest, Science, and Politics, trans. J. Shapiro. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [from Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie” (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968) and Protestbewegung und Hochschulreform (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1958)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970d. “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence,” Inquiry 13: 360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1971a. Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. J. Shapiro. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [Erkenntnis und Interesse (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1971b. “Reflections on the Linguistic Foundation of Sociology: The Christian Gauss Lecture.” Princeton University, February–March.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1973a. Kultur und Kritik. Verstreute Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1973b. Theory and Practice, trans. J. Viertel. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [Theorie und Praxis (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1971)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1974a. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article,” New German Critique 4 (Autumn): 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [Legitimationsprobleme int Spätkapitalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1973)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1976a. “The Analytical Theory of Science and Dialectics,” in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. Glyn Adey and David Frisby. New York: Harper & Row. 131–62.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1976b. “A Positivistically Bisected Rationalism: A Reply to a Pamphlet,” in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. Glyn Adey and David Frisby. New York: Harper & Row. 198–225.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1977a. “Hannah Arendt’s Communications Concept of Power,” Social Research 44, no. 1: 3–24.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1977b. “Martin Heidegger: On the Publication of Lectures from the Year 1935,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 6, no. 2: 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1979a. Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [from Zur Rekonstruktion des historischen Materialismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976) and Sprachpragmatik und Philosophy, ed. Apel, K.-O. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1980a. “The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality,” in Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique, ed. Bleicher, J.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 181–211 [originally published in 1970, and reprinted in the expanded edition of Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1980b. “The Inimitable Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung: How Horkheimer Took Advantage of a Historically Oppressive Hour,” Telos 45: 114–21.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1980d. “Psychic Thermidor and the Rebirth of Rebellious Subjectivity,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 24/25, no. 6: 1–12.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1982. “A Reply to My Critics,” Habermas Critical Debates, ed. Thompson, John B. and Held, David. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1983a. “Interpretive Social Science vs. Hermeneuticism,” in Social Science as Moral Inquiry, ed. Haan, Norma. New York: Columbia University Press. 251–69.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1983b. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1983c. Philosophical-Political Profiles, trans. F. G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Philosophisch-politische Profile (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981); essays from the period 1958–79].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (ed.) 1984a. Observations on “The Spiritual Situation of the Age”: Contemporary German Perspectives, trans. A. Buchwalter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Stichworte zur geistigen Situation der Zeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984b. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1984/1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 volumes., trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1985a. “Civil Disobedience. Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 96–116.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1985b. Die Neue Unübersichtlichkeit: Kleine Politische Schriften V. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1985c. “A Philosophico-Political Profile,” New Left Review 151 (May–June).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1985d. “Questions and Counterquestions,” in Habermas and Modernity, ed. Bernstein, R. J.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1986a. Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas, ed. Dews, P.. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1986b. “Drei Thesen zur Wirkungsgeschichte der Frankfurter Schule,” in Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, ed. Honneth, A. and Wellmer, A.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1986c. “Entgegnung,” in Kommunikatives Handeln, ed. Honneth, A. and Joas, H.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1986d. “The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies,” trans. Phillip Jacobs, Philosophy and Social Criticism 11, no. 2: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1986e. “Sovereignty and the Führerdemokratie,” Times Literary Supplement, September 26: 1053.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1987a. Eine Art Schadensabwicklung: Kleine Politische Schriften VI. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1988a. “Law and Morality,” in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. viii, ed. McMurrin, S., trans. K. Baynes. Salt Lake City: Utah University Press. 217–79.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1988b. “Lecture Notes on Plesner.” Lecture delivered at Northwestern University, fall 1988.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1988c. On the Logic of the Social Sciences, trans. S. Weber Nicholsen and J. A. Stark. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [originally published in 1967, reprinted as Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, exp. edn. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989a. The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, trans. S. Weber Nicholson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [mostly from Kleine Politische Schriften vols. v and vi (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985, 1987)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989b. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit (Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1962)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990a. “Justice and Solidarity,” in The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences, ed. Wren, T. E.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 224–52.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990b. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990c. “Morality, Sociality, and Ethics,” Acta Sociologica 33, no. 2: 93–114.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990d. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. F. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990e. “Review of Truth and Method,” in The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur, ed. Ormiston, Gayle and Schrift, Alan. Albany: SUNY Press. 231–44.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990f. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Mit einem Vorwort zur Neuauflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990g. “What Does Socialism Mean Today? The Rectifying Revolution and the Need for New Thinking on the Left,” New Left Review 183 (September–October): 3–21.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1991a. “A Reply,” in Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, ed. Honneth, Axel and Joas, Hans, trans. Jeremy Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1991c. “Thinking with Heidegger against Heidegger: On the Publication of Lectures Dating from 1935,” in The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, ed. Wolin, Richard, trans. Dale Ponikvar. New York: Columbia University Press. 186–97.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1992a. “Concluding Remarks,” in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1992b. Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, trans. W. Hohengarten. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Nachmetaphysisches Denken (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1992c. “Transcendence from Within, Transcendence in this World,” in Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, ed. Browning, Don S. and Florenza, Francis Chüssler. New York: Crossroads. 226–50.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1993a. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [from Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991) and Die Nachholende Revolution: Kleine Politische Schriften VII (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1993b. “Remarks on the Development of Horkheimer’s Work,” in On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, Bonss, Wolfgang, and McCole, John, trans. Kenneth Baynes and John McCole. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1993c. “Struggles for Recognition in Constitutional States,” European Journal of Philosophy 1: 128–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1994a. The Past as Future, trans. M. Pensky. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press [Vergangenheit Als Zukunft: Das Alte Deutschland im neuen Europa?, ed. M. Haller (Munich: Piper, 1993)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1994b. “Taking Aim at the Heart of the Present: On Foucault’s Lecture on Kant’s ‘What is Enlightenment?’,” in Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate, ed. Kelly, Michael. Boston, MA: MIT Press. 149–54.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1995a. “Communicative Freedom and Negative Theology,” in Kierkegaard in Post/Modernity, ed. Matuštík, Martin Beck and Westphal, Merold. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 182–99.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1995b. “Multiculturalism and the Liberal State,” Stanford Law Review 47, no. 5 (May): 849–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1995c. “Reconciliation Through the Use of Public Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy 92, no. 3: 109–31.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996a. “On the Cognitive Content of Morality,” trans. Ciaran Cronin, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996b. “Reply to Symposium Participants, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law,” Cardozo Law Review, special issue Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, Parts I and II, 17, nos. 4–5: 1477–559.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1997a. A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, trans. S. Rendall. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1997b. “Modernity: An Unfinished Project,” in Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, ed. Passerin d’Entèves, Maurizio and Benhabib, Seyla, trans. Nicholas Walker. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 38–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998a. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998b. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998c. “Knowledge and Human Interests: A General Perspective,” in Critical Theory: The Essential Readings, ed. Ingram, David and Simon-Ingram, Julia. Saint Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998d. “Learning By Disaster: A Diagnostic Look Back on the Short Twentieth Century,” Constellations 5: 307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998e. On the Pragmatics of Communication, ed. Cooke, M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2000a. “From Kant to Hegel: On Robert Brandom’s Pragmatic Philosophy of Language,” European Journal of Philosophy 8: 322–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2000b. “Nach dreißig Jahren: Bemerkungen zu Erkenntnis und Interesse,” in Das Interesse der Vernunft. Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit‚ Erkenntnis und Interesse, ed. Stefan, Müller-Doohm. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 12–20.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2000c. “Richard Rorty’s Pragmatic Turn,” in Rorty and His Critics, ed. Brandom, Robert B.. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 31–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001a. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?,” Political Theory 29, no. 6: 766–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001b. “Intentions, Conventions, and Linguistic Interactions” [1976], in On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action, trans. B. Fultner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 105–28.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001c. The Liberating Power of Symbols: Philosophical Essays, trans. P. Dews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Vom sinnlichen Eindruck zum symbolischen Ausdruck (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001d. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action, trans. B. Fultner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [selections from Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001e. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, trans. M. Pensky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Die postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2002a. “Postscript: Some Concluding Remarks,” in Habermas and Pragmatism, ed. Aboulafia, Mitchell, Bookman, Myra, and Kemp, Catherine. New York: Routledge. 223–33.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2002b. Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2002c. “Resentment of US Policies is Growing,” The Nation 275, no. 21: 15.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2003a. The Future of Human Nature, trans. H. Beister, W. Rehg, and M. Pensky. Cambridge: Polity Press [Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur: Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2001)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2003b. “On Law and Disagreement: Some Comments on ‘Interpretive Pluralism,’” Ratio Juris 16, no. 2: 193–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2003c. Truth and Justification, trans. B. Fultner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2004a. “After Historicism, Is Metaphysics Still Possible? On Hans-Georg Gadamer’s 100th Birthday,” in Gadamer’s Repercussions: Reconsidering Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Krajewski, Bruce, trans. Paul Malone. Berkeley: University of California Press. 15–20.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2004b. “America and the World: A Conversation with Habermas,” trans. Jeffrey Craig Miller, Logos 3, no. 3.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2004c. “Dialectical Idealism in Transition to Materialism: Schelling’s Idea of a Contraction of God and its Consequences for the Philosophy of History,” in The New Schelling, ed. Norman, Judith and Welchman, Alistair. London and New York: Continuum. 43–89.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2004d. “Einführung in den Abend,” in Schicksal in Antike und Moderne, ed. Theunissen, Michael. Munich: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung. 7–14.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2004e. “The Moral and the Ethical: A Reconsideration of the Issue of the Priority of the Right over the Good,” in Pragmatism, Critique, Judgment: Essays for Richard J. Bernstein, ed. Benhabib, S. and Fraser, N.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 29–43.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2004f. “Public Space and the Political Public Sphere: The Biographical Roots of Two Motifs in My Thought,” in Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press. 11–23.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2005. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätzen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2006a. “How to Respond to the Ethical Question,” in The Derrida–Habermas Reader, ed. Thomassen, Lasse. University of Chicago Press. 115–27.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2006b. “A Last Farewell: Derrida’s Enlightening Impact,” in The Derrida–Habermas Reader, ed. Thomassen, Lasse. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2006c. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research,” Communication Theory 16: 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2006d. “Religion in the Public Sphere,” European Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2007a. The Divided West, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press [Der gespaltene Westen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2004)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2007b. “Kommunikative Rationalität und grenzüberschreitende Politik,” in Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit, ed. Niesen, Peter and Herborth, Benjamin. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 406–59.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2007c. “The Language Game of Responsible Agency and the Problem of Free Will: How Can Epistemic Dualism Be Reconciled with Ontological Monism?,” trans. J. Anderson, Philosophical Explorations 10, no. 1: 13–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2007d. “Reply to Schroeder, Clarke, Searle, and Quante,” Philosophical Explorations 10, no. 1. 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2007e. “Die Zeit hatte einen doppelten Boden. Theodor W. Adorno in den fünfziger Jahren. Eine persönliche Notiz,” in Adorno-Portraits. Erinnerungen von Zeitgenossen, ed. Müller-Doohm, Stefan. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 15–23.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2008a. “Begegnungen mit Gershom Scholem,” Münchner Beiträge zur judischen Geschichte und Kultur 2: 9–18.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2008b. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press [Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2005)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2008c. “Europa und seine Immigranten,” in Ach, Europa! Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 88–95.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2008d. “Notes on a Post-Secular Society,” New Perspectives Quarterly 25, no. 4: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2009b. Europe: The Faltering Project, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press [Ach, Europa (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2008)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2009c. “Laudatio für Michael Thomasello.” Hegel Prize lecture, Stuttgart. www.stuttgart.de/item/show/383875Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2009d. Philosophische Texte: Studienausgabe in fünf Bänden. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2009e. “Wahrheitstheorien,” in Philosophische Texte, vol. ii. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2010a. “The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights,” Metaphilosophy 41: 464–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2010b. “Leadership and Leitkultur,” New York Times, October 29. www.nytimes.com/2010/10/29/opinion/29Habermas.html?_r=0Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2010c. “A Postsecular World Society? On the Philosophical Significance of Postsecular Consciousness and the Multicultural World Society,” interview by Eduardo Mendieta. SSRC, The Immanent Frame 1. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/A-Postsecular-World-Society-TIF.pdfGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2011a. “Concluding Discussion,” in The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, ed. Mendieta, Eduardo and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. New York: Columbia University Press. 109–17.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2011b. “‘The Political’: The Rational Meaning of a Questionable Inheritance of Political Theology,” in The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, ed. Mendieta, Eduardo and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. New York: Columbia University Press. 15–33.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2011c. “Reply to My Critics,” in Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, ed. Finlayson, James Gordon and Freyenhagen, Fabian. New York: Routledge. 283–304.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2012a. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press [Zur Verfassung Europas (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2011)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2012b. Nachmetaphysiches Denken II: Aufsätze und Repliken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2012c. “Myth and Ritual.” Berkeley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, October 19. https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/events/myth-and-ritualGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2013a. “Herbert Marcuse: Critical Educator for a New Generation – A Personal Reminiscence,” trans. Charles Reitz, Radical Philosophy Review 16, no. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2013b. “Reply to My Critics,” in Habermas and Religion, ed. Calhoun, Craig, Mendieta, Eduardo, and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. Cambridge: Polity Press. 347–90.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2014a. “Hauke Brunkhorst’s Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Some Comments on Theory Construction,” Social and Legal Studies 23, no. 4: 533–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2014b. “Plea for a Constitutionalization of International Law,” Philosophy & Social Criticism 40, no. 1: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2015. The Lure of Technocracy, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2016a. “Core Europe to the Rescue: A Conversation with Jürgen Habermas about Brexit and the EU Crisis,” Social Europe, July 12. www.socialeurope.eu/2016/07/core-europe-to-the-rescue/Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2016b. “For a Democratic Polarisation. An Interview with Jürgen Habermas,” Social Europe, November 17. www.socialeurope.eu/2016/11/democratic-polarisation-pull-ground-right-wing-populism/Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2016c. “Geburtstagsbrief an einen alten Freund und Kollegen,” Charles Taylors Landkarte. Transit, Europäische Revue 49 (Autumn): 179–81.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2016d. “Kommunikative Vernunft. Interview von C. Demmerling und H-P. Krüger,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 64, no. 5: 806–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 2017. “Zur Genealogie nachmetaphysischen Denken. Auch eine Geshichte der Philosophie. Am Leitfaden des Diskurses Über Glauben und Wissen.” Starnberg: Manuscript.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. n.d. Essay on Faith and Knowledge: Postmetaphysical Thinking and the Secular Self-Interpretation of Modernity.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. n.d. “From Worldviews to the Lifeworld: On the Genealogy of a Concept.”Google Scholar
Habermas, J. and Derrida, J. 2005. “February 15, or, What Binds Europeans Together,” in Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe: Transatlantic Relations After the Iraq War, ed. Levy, D., Pensky, M., and Torpey, J. C.. London: Verso. 3–13.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. and Friedeburg, Ludwig von, eds. 1983. Adorno-Konferenz 1983. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. and Luhmann, N. 1971. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie: Was Leistet die Systemforschung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. and Ratzinger, J. 2006. Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion, trans. B. McNeil. San Francisco: Ignatius Press [Dialektik der Säkularisierung: Über Vernunft und Religion (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2005)].Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Dӧbert, R., and Nunner-Winkler, C. 1977. Die Entwicklung des Ich. Dologne: Kiepenheruer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Lubasz, H., and Spengler, T. 1979. “Theory and Politics: A Discussion with Herbert Marcuse,” Telos 38: 124–53.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., et al. 2010. An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age, trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press [Ein Bewusstsein von dem, was fehlt (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2008)].Google Scholar