Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:43:48.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - UN Peacekeeping and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Learning How to Protect the Rights of Detainees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Monika Heupel
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany
Michael Zürn
Affiliation:
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Protecting the Individual from International Authority
Human Rights in International Organizations
, pp. 186 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International 1994. ‘Amnesty International Report 1994 – Somalia’. 1 January. www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a9f748.html (18 October 2015).Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2000. ‘Document – Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Kosovo): Setting the Standard – UNMIK and KFOR’s Response to the Violence in Mitrovica’. 13 March. AI Index EUR 70/13/00.Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2001. ‘Document – Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Kosovo): Amnesty International Calls for an End to Executive Orders of Detention’. 3 August. AI Index EUR 70/017/2001.Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2002. ‘Document – Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Kosovo): No Impunity for the International Community’. 18 June. AI Index EUR 70/005/2002.Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2004. ‘The Apparent Lack of Accountability of International Peace-Keeping Forces in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina’. April. AI Index EUR 05/002/2004.Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2006. ‘Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro). United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK): Briefing to the Human Rights Committee’. 87th Session, July. AI Index EUR 70/007/2006.Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2012. ‘Proposed New Rules for Detainees in International Military Operations Fall Far Short of Human Rights Standards’. Public Statement at the ‘Copenhagen Process’ meeting, 16 October. AI Index IOR 50/002/2012.Google Scholar
Aust, Helmut 2015. ‘The UN Human Rights due diligence policy: An effective mechanism against complicity of peacekeeping forces?’. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 20(1): 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitegger, Alexander 2009. ‘Sacrificing the effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights on the altar of the effective functioning of peace support operations: A critique of Behrami & Saramati and Al Jedda’. International Community Law Review 11: 155183.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon 2002. Justice under International Administration: Kosovo, East Timor and Afghanistan. New York: International Peace Academy.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon 2009. ‘Unaccountable? The United Nations, emergency powers, and the rule of law’. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42(5): 15091541.Google Scholar
CoE (Council of Europe) 1999. ‘Council of Europe’s Contribution to the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo’. Committee of Ministers, CM/Inf(99)48, 23 July.Google Scholar
CoE (Council of Europe) 2002. ‘Kosovo: The Human Rights Situation and the Fate of Persons Displaced from their Homes’. Report by Alvaro Gil-Robles, Commissioner for Human Rights for the attention of the Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, CommDH(2002)11, Strasbourg, 16 October.Google Scholar
CoE (Council of Europe) 2004. ‘Draft Opinion on Human Rights in Kosovo: Possible Establishment of a Review Mechanism’. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Opinion no. 280, CDL-DI (2004)004, Strasbourg, 1 October.Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric 2010. ‘Human rights accountability of international administrations: Theory and practice in East Timor’, in Wouters, , Brems, , Smis, and Schmitt, (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations. Antwerp: Intersentia pp. 331354.Google Scholar
ICRC (International Committee for the Red Cross) 2003. ‘Expert Meeting on Multilateral Peace Operations, Report’. Geneva, 11–12 December.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Florian and Mégret, Frédéric 2005. ‘Fostering human rights accountability: An ombudsperson for the United Nations?Global Governance 11(1): 4363.Google Scholar
Knoll, Bernhard. 2008. ‘Rights without remedies: The European Court’s failure to close the human rights gap in Kosovo’. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 68: 431451.Google Scholar
Marshall, David and Inglis, Shelley 2003. ‘The disempowerment of human rights-based justice in the United Nations Mission in Kosovo’. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 95146.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric and Hoffmann, Florian 2003. ‘The UN as a human rights violator? Some reflections on the United Nations changing human rights responsibilities’. Human Rights Quarterly 25(2): 314342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momirov, Aleksandar 2012. ‘Local impact of “UN Accountability” under international law: The rise and fall of UNMIK’s Human Rights Advisory Panel’. International Peacekeeping 19(1): 318.Google Scholar
Mujezinović Larsen, Kjetil 2008. ‘Attribution of conduct in peace operations: The “ultimate authority and control” test’. European Journal of International Law 19(3): 509531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OIK (Ombudsperson Institution in Kosovo) 2001a. ‘Special Report No. 3. The Conformity of Deprivations of Liberty under “Executive Orders” with Recognised International Standards’. 29 June.Google Scholar
OIK (Ombudsperson Institution in Kosovo) 2001b. ‘Special Report No. 4. Certain Aspects of UNMIK Regulation No. 2001/18 on the Establishment of a Detention Review Commission for Extra-judicial Detentions Based on Executive Orders’. 25 August.Google Scholar
OIK (Ombudsperson Institution in Kosovo) 2002. ‘Second Annual Report 2001–2002’. Addressed to SRSG Michael Steiner, Pristina, 10 July.Google Scholar
OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) 1999. ‘Decision No. 305, PC Journal No. 237, Agenda item 2, Permanent Council, PC.DEC/305’. 1 July.Google Scholar
OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) 2001. ‘Review of the Criminal Justice System’. Mission in Kosovo, Department of Human Rights and Rule of Law, October. www.osce.org/kosovo/23307?download=true (18 October 2015).Google Scholar
Oswald, Bruce 2011. ‘Detention by United Nations peacekeepers: Searching for definition and categorisation’. Journal of International Peacekeeping 15(1–2): 119151.Google Scholar
Pacquée, Didier and Dewulf, Steven. 2006. ‘International territorial administrations and the rule of law: The case of Kosovo’. Essex Human Rights Review 4(1): 114.Google Scholar
Stahn, Carsten 2008. The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration. Versailles to Iraq and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trenkov-Wermuth, Calin 2010. United Nations Justice: Legal and Judicial Reform in Governance Operations. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
UN DPKO (United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations) 2000. ‘United Nations Civilian Police Principles and Guidelines’. 15 November. New York: United Nations. www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/GLINES_UN_CIVPOL_2000.pdf (18 October 2015).Google Scholar
UN DPKO (United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations) 2009. Human Rights Standards in Arrest and Detention. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Office in Vienna 1994. ‘UN Criminal Justice Standards for Peacekeeping Police (“Bluebook”)’. Vienna: United Nations. www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/UN_criminal_justice_standards_for_UN_police.pdf (20 October 2015).Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council 2006. ‘Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee (Kosovo)’. UN Doc. CCPR/C/UNK/CO/1. Geneva, 14 August.Google Scholar
UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) 2000. ‘Regulation 2000/38 on the Establishment of the Ombudsperson Institution in Kosovo’. UN Doc. UNMIK/REG/2000/38. 30 June.Google Scholar
UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) 2001. ‘Regulation on the Establishment of a Detention Review Commission for Extra-Judicial Detentions based on Executive Orders’. UN Doc. UNMIK/REG/2001/18. 25 August.Google Scholar
UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) 2006. ‘Regulation on the Establishment of the Human Rights Advisory Panel’. UN Doc. UNMIK/REG/2006/12. 23 March.Google Scholar
UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) 2009. ‘Administrative Directive on Implementing UNMIK/REG/2006/12’. UN Doc. UNMIK/DIR/2009/1. 17 October.Google Scholar
UNODC/DPKO (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime/Department of Peacekeeping Operations) 2009. ‘United Nations Criminal Justice Standards for United Nations Police’. Vienna: United Nations. www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/UN_criminal_justice_standards_for_UN_police.pdf (18 October 2015).Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General 1999. ‘Secretary-General’s Bulletin on the “Observance by United Nations forces of international humanitarian law”’. UN Doc. ST/SGB 1999/13.Google Scholar
Visoka, Gezim 2012. ‘The “Kafkaesque accountability” of international governance in Kosovo’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6(2): 189212.Google Scholar
Winkler, Thomas 2010. ‘The Copenhagen process on detainees: A necessity’. Nordic Journal of International Law 78: 489498.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×