Handyside, AH, Kontogianni, EH, Hardy, K, Winston, RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344(6268): 768–70.Google Scholar

Munné, S, Dailey, T, Sultan, KM, Grifo, J, Cohen, J. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Human Reprod 1995;10: 1015–21 .Google Scholar

Verlinsky, Y, Cieslak, J, Freidine, M et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Mol. Hum Reprod. 1995;10: 1923–27.Google Scholar

Harper, J., Coonen, E., De Rycke, M. et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium steering committee. Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25: 821–23.Google Scholar

Harton, G, Magli, C, Lundin, Kersti et al. JC ESHRE PGD consortium/embryology special interest group-best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Human Reproduction 2010;26:41–46.Google Scholar

De Rycke, M, Belva, F, Goossens, V et al.ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod 2015;30: 1763–89 .Google Scholar

Gianaroli, L, Magli, MC, Pomante, A et al. Blastocentesis: a source of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing. Results from a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2014 December;102(6): 1692–9.Google Scholar

Ruangvutilert, P, Delhanty, JDA, Rodeck, C, Harper, JC. Relative efficiency of FISH on metaphase and interphase nuclei from non-mosaic trisomic or triploid fibroblast cultures. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2000;20: 159–62.Google Scholar

Rubio, C, Giménez, C, Fernández, E et al. Spanish interest group in preimplantation genetics, Spanish society for the study of the biology of reproduction. The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints. Hum Reprod. 2009;24: 2045–47 .Google Scholar

Rubio, C, Bellver, J, Rodrigo, L et al. Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials. Fertil Steril. 2013;99: 1400–07 .Google Scholar

Forman, EJ, Hong, KH, Ferry, KM et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:100–07.Google Scholar

Scott, RT Jr, Upham, KM, Forman, EJ et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697–703.Google Scholar

Vera-Rodríguez, M, Michel, CE, Mercader, A et al. Distribution patterns of segmental aneuploidies in human blastocysts identified by next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2016;105: 1047–55 .Google Scholar

Ruttanajit, T, Chanchamroen, S, Cram, DS et al.Detection and quantitation of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts using copy number variation sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2016;36: 154–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rubio, C, Bellver, J, Rodrigo, L et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107: 1122–29 .Google Scholar

Mastenbroek, S, Twisk, M, van der Veen, F, Repping, S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17: 454–66.Google Scholar

Musters, AM, Repping, S, Korevaar, JC et al. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review of the best available evidence. Fertil Steril. 2011;95: 2153–57 .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blockeel, C, Schutyser, V, De Vos, A et al. Prospectively randomized controlled trial of PGS in IVF/ICSI patients with poor implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17: 848–54.Google Scholar

Garcia-Herrero, S, Rodrigo, L, Mateu, E et al. Medecine therapeutique/Medecine de la reproduction, gyn_ecologie et endocrinologie. John Libbey Eurotext, 2014;14: 112–19.Google Scholar

Rodrigo, L, Mateu, E, Mercader, A et al. New tools for embryo selection: comprehensive chromosome screening by array comparative genomic hybridization. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:517125.Google Scholar

Coates, A, Hesla, JS, Hurliman, A et al. Use of suboptimal sperm increases the risk of aneuploidy of the sex chromosomes in preimplantation blastocyst embryos. Fertil Steril. 2015;104: 866–72.Google Scholar

Al-Asmar, N, Peinado, V, Vera, M et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos from couples with a previous aneuploid miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2012;98: 145–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, Z, Liu, J, Collins, GS et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 2012;5:24.Google Scholar

Ravichandran, K, McCaffrey, C, Grifo, J et al.Mitochondrial DNA quantification as a tool for embryo viability assessment: retrospective analysis of data from single euploid blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2017;32: 1282–92 .Google Scholar

Treff, NR, Zhan, Y, Tao, X et al. Levels of trophectoderm mitochondrial DNA do not predict the reproductive potential of sibling embryos. Hum Reprod. 2017;32: 954–62.Google Scholar

Feichtinger, M, Vaccari, E, Carli, L et al. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening using array comparative genomic hybridization on spent culture media: a proof-of-concept pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; pii: S1472-6483(17)30147–5.Google Scholar

Victor, AR, Brake, AJ, Tyndall, JC et al. Accurate quantitation of mitochondrial DNA reveals uniform levels in human blastocysts irrespective of ploidy, age, or implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:34–42.Google Scholar

Liu, W, Liu, J, Du, H et al. Non-invasive pre-implantation aneuploidy screening and diagnosis of beta thalassemia IVSII654 mutation using spent embryo culture medium. Ann Med. 2017;49: 319–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gebhart, MB, Hines, RS, Penman, A, Holland, AC. How do patient perceived determinants influence the decision-making process to accept or decline preimplantation genetic screening? Fertil Steril 2016;105: 188–93.Google Scholar

Hens, K, Dondorp, W, Handyside, AH et al. Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing. A review of the challenges. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19: 366–75.Google Scholar

Greco, E, Minasi, MG, Fiorentino, F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med.2015;373:2089–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harper, J, Jackson, E, Sermon, K et al.(2017). Adjunts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Human Reproduction, 2: 485–91.Google Scholar