Book contents
- Genome Editing and Engineering
- Genome Editing and Engineering
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Biology of Endonucleases (Zinc-Finger Nuclease, TALENs and CRISPRs) and Regulatory Networks
- Part II Genome Editing in Model Organisms
- Part III Technology Development and Screening
- Part IV Genome Editing in Stem Cells and Regenerative Biology
- 16 Targeted Genome Editing Using Nuclease-assisted Vector Integration
- 17 Genome Engineering Using Sleeping Beauty Transposition in Vertebrates
- 18 Genome Editing of Pluripotent Stem Cells
- 19 Principles for Targeting Adult Tissue Stem Cells to Achieve Durable Gene and Gene Editing Therapies
- 20 Therapeutic Genome Editing in Human Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
- Part V Genome Editing in Disease Biology
- Part VI Legal (Intellectual Property) and Bioethical Issues of Genome Editing
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
16 - Targeted Genome Editing Using Nuclease-assisted Vector Integration
from Part IV - Genome Editing in Stem Cells and Regenerative Biology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2018
Edited by
Foreword by
Book contents
- Genome Editing and Engineering
- Genome Editing and Engineering
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Part I Biology of Endonucleases (Zinc-Finger Nuclease, TALENs and CRISPRs) and Regulatory Networks
- Part II Genome Editing in Model Organisms
- Part III Technology Development and Screening
- Part IV Genome Editing in Stem Cells and Regenerative Biology
- 16 Targeted Genome Editing Using Nuclease-assisted Vector Integration
- 17 Genome Engineering Using Sleeping Beauty Transposition in Vertebrates
- 18 Genome Editing of Pluripotent Stem Cells
- 19 Principles for Targeting Adult Tissue Stem Cells to Achieve Durable Gene and Gene Editing Therapies
- 20 Therapeutic Genome Editing in Human Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
- Part V Genome Editing in Disease Biology
- Part VI Legal (Intellectual Property) and Bioethical Issues of Genome Editing
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genome Editing and EngineeringFrom TALENs, ZFNs and CRISPRs to Molecular Surgery, pp. 237 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Boch, J, Scholze, H, Schornack, S, et al. 2009. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 326(5959): 1509–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A, Woods, WS, Perez-Pinera, P. 2016. Multiplexed targeted genome engineering using a universal nuclease-assisted vector integration system. ACS Synth Biol 5(7): 582–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, SM, Ortiz, L, Mali, P, Aach, J, Church, GM. 2014. Multi-kilobase homozygous targeted gene replacement in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 43(3): e21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cong, L, Ran, FA, Cox, D, et al. 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339(6121): 819–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doench, JG, Hartenian, E, Graham, DB, et al. 2014. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation. Nat Biotechnol 32(12): 1262–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doudna, JA, Charpentier, E. 2014. Genome editing: the new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346(6213): 1258096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finocchiaro, G, Ito, M, Ikeda, Y, Tanaka, K. 1988. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of cDNAs encoding the alpha-subunit of human electron transfer flavoprotein. J Biol Chem 263(30): 15773–15780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, Y, Foden, JA, Khayter, C, et al. 2013. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 31(9): 822–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, Y, Sander, JD, Reyon, D, Cascio, VM, Joung, JK. 2014. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol 32(3): 279–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, B, Schwimmer, LJ, Fuller, RP, et al. 2010. Modular system for the construction of zinc-finger libraries and proteins. Nat Protoc 5(4): 791–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilinger, JP, Thompson, DB, Liu, DR 2014. Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification. Nat Biotechnol 32(6): 577–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, PD, Lander, ES, Zhang, F. 2014. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157(6): 1262–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, PD, Scott, DA, Weinstein, JA, et al. 2013. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 31(9): 827–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, SP, Bartek, J. 2009. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461(7267): 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jinek, M, East, A, Cheng, A, et al. 2013. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. Elife 2: e00471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinstiver, BP, Pattanayak, V, Prew, MS, et al. 2016. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529(7587): 490–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, X, Potter, J, Kumar, S, et al. 2015. Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. J Biotechnol 208: 44–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieber, MR. 2010. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79(1): 181–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mali, P, Yang, L, Esvelt, KM, et al. 2013. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339(6121): 823–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandell, JG, Barbas, CF. 2006. Zinc finger tools: custom DNA-binding domains for transcription factors and nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Web Server): W516–W523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McVey, M, Lee, SE. 2008. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director’s cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet 24(11): 529–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moscou, MJ, Bogdanove, AJ. 2009. A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors. Science 326(5959): 1501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynahan, ME, Jasin, M. 2010. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11(3): 196–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakade, S, Tsubota, T, Sakane, Y, et al. 2014. Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat Commun 5: 5560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nussenzweig, A, Nussenzweig, MC. 2007. A backup DNA repair pathway moves to the forefront. Cell 131(2): 223–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabo, CO, Peisach, E, Grant, RA. 2001. Design and selection of novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 70(1): 313–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pattanayak, V, Lin, S, Guilinger, JP, et al. 2013. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol 31(9): 839–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popp, MW, Maquat, LE. 2016. Leveraging rules of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay for genome engineering and personalized medicine. Cell 165(6): 1319–1322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakuma, T, Nakade, S, Sakane, Y, Suzuki, KT, Yamamoto, T. 2016. MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems. Nat Protoc 11(1): 118–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakuma, T, Takenaga, M, Kawabe, Y, et al. 2015. Homologous recombination: independent large gene cassette knock-in in CHO cells using TALEN and MMEJ-directed donor plasmids. Int J Mol Sci 16(10): 23849–23866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaymaker, IM, Gao, L, Zetsche, B, et al. 2016. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351(6268): 84–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, SQ, Wyvekens, N, Khayter, C, et al. 2014. Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing. Nat Biotechnol 32(6): 569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, AV, Nunez, JK, Doudna, JA. 2016. Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature’s toolbox for genome engineering. Cell 164(1–2): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, X, Liang, X, Xie, H, et al. 2016. Improved delivery of Cas9 protein/gRNA complexes using lipofectamine CRISPRMAX. Biotechnol Lett 38(6): 919–929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed