Book contents
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion toComparative Constitutional Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases (Selection)
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Historical Experiences
- Part III Constitutional Principles
- Part IV State Institutions
- Part V Transnational Constitutionalism
- Index
- References
Part I - Theoretical Foundations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2019
Book contents
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion toComparative Constitutional Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases (Selection)
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Historical Experiences
- Part III Constitutional Principles
- Part IV State Institutions
- Part V Transnational Constitutionalism
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further Reading
Gardbaum, S., ‘How Do and Should We Compare Constitutional Law’, in Besson, Samantha et al. (eds.), Comparing Comparative Law (Schulthess, 2017), 109–126.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’ 2005 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies’ 2013 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1–12.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Jackson, V.C., ‘Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law’ 2010 28 Penn State International Law Review 319–326.Google Scholar
Jackson, V.C., ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’, in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), 54–74.Google Scholar
Meuwese, A. and Versteeg, M., ‘Quantitative Methods for Comparative Constitutional Law’, in Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 230–256.Google Scholar
Reimann, M., ‘Comparative Law and Neighboring Disciplines’, in Bussani, Mauro and Mattei, Ugo (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 13–34.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K.L., ‘Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction’ 2004 38 Law & Society Review 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M., ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’ 1999 108 Yale Law Journal 1225–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Further Reading
Albert, R., Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Casper, G., Constitutionalism (1987) University of Chicago Law Occasional Papers No. 22.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. and Hertig, M., ‘The Prospects of 21st Century Constitutionalism’ (2003) 7 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 261–328.Google Scholar
Gordon, S., Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today (Harvard University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, J.-E., Constitutionalism and Political Theory (Manchester University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Murkens, J.E.K., ‘The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 427–455.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., ‘Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion’ (1962) 56 American Political Science Review 853–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R., ‘Constitutionalism and the European Union’, in Barnard, C. and Peers, S. (eds.), European Union Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), 71–96.Google Scholar