Book contents
Part II - The Human Mind and Its Study
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017
Edited by
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky , pp. 153 - 254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Bemis, D. K., and Pylkkänen, L.. 2011. “Simple Composition: A Magnetoencephalography Investigation into the Comprehension of Minimal Linguistic Phrases.” The Journal of Neuroscience 31(8):2801–2814. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-10.2011Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. and Theofanopoulou, C.. 2014. “A Multidimensional Interdisciplinary Framework for Linguistics: The Lexicon as a Case Study.” Journal of Cognitive Science 15:403–420.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., and Schlesewsky, M.. 2013. “Reconciling Time, Space and Function: A New Dorsal–Ventral Stream Model of Sentence Comprehension.” Brain and Language 125(1):60–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.010Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ding, N., and Simon, J. Z.. 2012. “Neural Coding of Continuous Speech in Auditory Cortex During Monaural and Dichotic Listening.” Journal of Neurophysiology 107(1):78–89. doi: 10.1152/jn.00297.2011Google Scholar
Ding, N, Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., and Poeppel, D.. 2015. “Cortical Entrainment Reflects Hierarchical Structure Building in Speech Comprehension.” Nature Neuroscience. doi:10.1038/nn.4186Google Scholar
Doelling, K., and Poeppel, D.. 2015. “Cortical Entrainment to Music and Its Modulation by Expertise.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(45):E6233–6242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508431112Google Scholar
Embick, D., and Poeppel, D.. 2015. “Towards a Computational(ist) Neurobiology of Language: Correlational, Integrated and Explanatory Neurolinguistics.” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(4):357–366.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T. 2014. “Toward a Computational Framework for Cognitive Biology: Unifying Approaches from Cognitive Neuroscience and Comparative Cognition.” Physics of Life Reviews 11(3):329–364. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.005Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T., and Friederici, A. D.. 2012. “Artificial Grammar Learning Meets Formal Language Theory: An Overview.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1598):1933–1955. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0103Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. 2011. “The Brain Basis of Language Processing: From Structure to Function.” Physiological Reviews 91(4):1357–1392. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. I., and Anwander, A.. 2006. “The Brain Differentiates Human and Non-Human Grammars: Functional Localization and Structural Connectivity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(7):2458–2463.Google Scholar
Fruchter, J. and Marantz, A.. 2015. “Decomposition, Lookup, and Recombination: MEG Evidence for the Full Decomposition Model of Complex Visual Word Recognition.” Brain and Language 143:81–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001Google Scholar
Giraud, A.L. and Poeppel, D.. 2012. “Cortical Oscillations and Speech Processing: Emerging Computational Principles and Operations.” Nature Neuroscience 15(4):511–517. doi: 10.1038/nn.3063.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. “The Neurology of Syntax: Language Use Without Broca’s Area.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(01):1–21.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T.. 2002. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?” Science 298(5598):1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickok, G., and Poeppel, D.. 2007. “The Cortical Organization of Speech Processing.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(5):393–402.Google Scholar
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., and Poeppel, D.. 2008. “A Cortical Network for Semantics: (de) Constructing the N400.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9(12):920–933. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G., and Poeppel, D.. 2014. “The Role of Visual Representations During the Lexical Access of Spoken Words.” Brain and Language 134:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.008Google Scholar
Luo, H., and Poeppel, D.. 2007. “Phase Patterns of Neuronal Responses Reliably Discriminate Speech in Human Auditory Cortex.” Neuron 54:1001–1010.Google Scholar
Mesgarani, N., David, S. V., Fritz, J. B., and Shamma, S. A.. 2008. “Phoneme Representation and Classification in Primary Auditory Cortex.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(2):899–909. doi: 10.1121/1.2816572Google Scholar
Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., and Chang, E. F.. 2014. “Phonetic Feature Encoding in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus.” Science 343(6174):1006–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1245994Google Scholar
Murphy, E. 2015. “The Brain Dynamics of Linguistic Computation.” Frontiers in Psychology. 6:1515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01515 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01515Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Devauchelle, A. D., and Dehaene, S.. 2011. “Cortical Representation of the Constituent Structure of Sentences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(6):2522–2527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018711108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, H., Ince, R. A., Schyns, P. G., Thut, G., and Gross, J.. 2015. “Frontal Top-Down Signals Increase Coupling of Auditory Low-Frequency Oscillations to Continuous Speech in Human Listeners.” Current Biology 25(12):1649–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.049Google Scholar
Peelle, J. E., Gross, J., and Davis, M. H.. 2013. “Phase-Locked Responses to Speech in Human Auditory Cortex Are Enhanced During Comprehension.” Cerebral Cortex 23(6):1378–1387. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs118Google Scholar
Petitto, L. 2005. “How the Brain Begets Language.” In McGilvray, J., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky (1st ed). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petkov, C. I., Kayser, C., Augath, M., and Logothetis, N. K.. 2006. “Functional Imaging Reveals Numerous Fields in the Monkey Auditory Cortex.” PLoS Biol 4(7):e215. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040215Google Scholar
Poeppel, D. 2012. “The Maps Problem and the Mapping Problem: Two Challenges for a Cognitive Neuroscience of Speech and Language.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 29(1–2):34–55.Google Scholar
Poeppel, D., and Embick, D.. 2005. “The Relation Between Linguistics and Neuroscience.” In Cutler, A., ed. Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P., and Scott, S. K. 2009. “Maps and Streams in the Auditory Cortex: Nonhuman Primates Illuminate Human Speech Processing.” Nature Neuroscience 12(6):718–724. doi: 10.1038/nn.2331Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K., Glasser, M. F., Preuss, T. M., Ma, X., Zhao, T., Hu, X., and Behrens, T. E.. 2008. “The Evolution of the Arcuate Fasciculus Revealed with Comparative DTI.” Nature Neuroscience 11(4):426–428. doi: 10.1038/nn2072Google Scholar
Roy, D., Patel, R., DeCamp, P., Kubat, R., Fleischman, M., Roy, B., Mavridis, N., Tellex, S., Salata, A., Guiness, J., Levit, M., and Gorniak, P.. 2006. The Human Speechome Project. Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 6 pages.Google Scholar
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Herve, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houde, O., Mazoyer, B., and Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.. 2006. “Meta-Analyzing Left Hemisphere Language Areas: Phonology, Semantics, and Sentence Processing.” Neuroimage 30(4):1414–1432.Google Scholar
References
Berwick, Robert and Chomsky, Noam. 2011. “The Biolinguistic Program: The Current State of its Evolution.” In Di Sciullo, A.-M. and Boeckx, C., eds. The Biolinguistic Enterprise. Oxford University Press. 19–41.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert and Chomsky, Noam. 2016. Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Carroll, Sean B. 2005. Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo-Devo. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Cherniak, Christopher. 2005. “Innateness and Brain-Wiring Optimization: Non-Genomic Innateness.” In Zilhao, A., ed. Evolution, Rationality, and Cognition. New York: Routledge. 103–112.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966/2009. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper and Row. 2009 3rd edition with new introduction by McGilvray, J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Foreword by Smith, Neil. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Kenstowicz, Michael, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In Belletti, Adriana, ed. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. III: Structures and Beyond. Oxford University Press. 104–131.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. “Three Factors in Language Design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36(1):1–22.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. “On Phases.” In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P., and Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 133–166.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2010. “Some Simple Evo Devo Theses: How True Might They Be for Language.” In Larson, Richard K., Déprez, Viviane, and Yamakido, Hiroko, eds. The Evolution of Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. 45–62.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2012. “The Machine, the Ghost, and the Limits of Understanding.” Talk given at the University of Oslo, September 2011. Available on youtube.com as of 2012: www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5in5EdjhD0&ebc=ANyPxKoMUUZgd7mG5QM3iBAcrpyzHqQ9Nj9JqkXGE1Dbo3eFnnDRvXHE8iVOxNtH20GCQ2PUu6oL7ilMW3rzeePqGXJHJ1DJ2gGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013b. “Notes on Denotation and Denoting.” In Caponigro, I. and Conchetto, C., eds. From Grammar to Meaning. Cambridge University Press. 38–45.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013c. “What Can We Understand?” (Second lecture of 2013 Dewey Lectures, “What Kind of Creatures Are We?”) The Journal of Philosophy 110(12).Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015 “Problems of Projection – Extensions.” In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C., and Matteini, S., eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and McGilvray, J.. 2012. The Science of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, John. 2007. “Meta-Scientific Eliminativism: A Reconsideration of Chomsky’s Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58:625–58.Google Scholar
Descartes, Rene. 1984. “Comments on a Certain Broadsheet.” In Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D., trans. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (Vol. I). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1981. “The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy.” In Fodor, , Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry and Pylyshyn, Z. W.. 2014. Minds without Meanings: An Essay on the Content of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T.. 2002. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?” Science 298:1569–1579.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc, Yang, Charles, Berwick, Robert, Tattersall, Ian, Ryan, Michael, Watumull, Jeffrey, Chomsky, Noam, and Lewontin, Richard. 2014. “The Mystery of Language Evolution.” Frontiers in Psychology 5:1–12.Google Scholar
Hinzen, Wolfram and Sheehan, Michelle. 2013. “Un-Cartesian (Bio-)linguistics?” Teorema 34 1:161–186.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy and Golinkoff, Roberta. 1996. The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart. 1993. Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 1998. “The Evolution of Cognition: Questions We Will Never Answer.” In Scarborough, D. and Sternberg, S., eds. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. IV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 107–132.Google Scholar
McGilvray, James. 1999/2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics. 1st ed. 1999 and much-revised 2nd ed. 2014. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
McGilvray, James. (2016). “On the History of Universal Grammar.” In Roberts, Ian, ed. Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pietroski, Paul. 2010. “Concepts, Meanings, and Truth: First Nature, Second Nature and Hard Work.” Mind and Language 25:
247–278.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1971. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” The Review of Metaphysics 25:3–51.Google Scholar
Thompson, D’Arcy. 1917/1942/1992. On Growth and Form. Ed. Bonner, John Tyler; foreword by Gould, Stephen Jay. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turing, Alan. 1992. Collected Works of Alan Turing: Morphogenesis. Ed. Saunders, P. T.. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. Anscombe, Elizabeth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woodward, Amanda. 2008. “‘Infants’ Learning about Intentional Action.” In Woodward, A. and Needham, A., eds. Learning and the Infant Mind. Oxford University Press. 227–248.Google Scholar
References
Bale, A. and Barner, D.. 2009. “The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Exploring the Mass/Count Distinction.” Journal of Semantics 26(3):217–252.Google Scholar
Cartwright, H. 1963. Classes, Quantities, and Non-singular Reference. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, B. 1987. “Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English.” Linguistics and Philosophy 102:199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. and Marantz, A.. 1993. “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J., eds. The View from Building 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. and Noyer, R.. 2003. “Distributed Morphology.” In Cheng, L. and Sybesma, R., eds. The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laurence, S. and Margolis, E.. 1999. Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, S. 2007. “Generics and the Structure of the Mind.” Philosophical Perspectives 21:375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1972. “General Semantics.” In Davidson, D. and Harman, G., eds. Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Link, G. 1983. “The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach.” In Bäuerle, R. et al., eds. Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. 1998. “Meanings Are Syntactically Individuated and Found in the Head.” Mind and Language 13:225–280.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. 2005. “Meaning and Creativity.” In McGilvray, , ed. Cambridge Companion to Chomsky (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pietroski, P. 2005. “Meaning Before Truth.” In Preyer, G. and Peters, G., eds. Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pietroski, P. 2010. “Concepts, Meanings, and Truth: First Nature, Second Nature and Hard Work.” Mind and Language 25:247–278.Google Scholar
Pietroski, P. 2011. “Minimal Semantic Instructions.” In Boeckx, C., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pietroski, P. forthcoming. “I-Languages and T-Sentences.” In Armour-Garb, B., ed. The Relevance of the Liar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Gunderson, K., ed. Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stainton, R. 2008. “Meaning and Reference: Some Chomskyan Themes.” In Lepore, E. and Smith, B., eds. Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
Berwick, R., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., and Chomsky, N.. 2011. “Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited.” Cognitive Science 35:1207–1242.Google Scholar
Callebaut, W. and Rasskin-Gutman, D.. 2005. Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1984. Modular Approaches to the Study of the Mind. San Diego: San Diego University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Language and the Problem of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000a. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000b. “Linguistics and Brain Sciences.” In Marantz, A., Miyashita, Y., and O’Neil, W., eds. Image, Language, Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 13–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000c. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J., eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2003a. “Reply to Gopnik.” In Antony, L. M. and Hornstein, N., eds. Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 316–325.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2003b. “Reply to Lycan.” In Antony, L. M. and Hornstein, N., eds. Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 255–263.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004a. “Language and Mind: Current Thoughts on Ancient Problems.” In Jenkins, L., ed. Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 379–406.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. “Approaching UG from Below.” In Sauerland, U. and Gärtner, H.-M., eds. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–30.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2009. “Opening Remarks.” In Piatelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., and Salaburu, P., eds. Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 12–44.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2010. “Some Simple Evo Devo Theses: How True Might They Be for Language.” In Larson, R., Déprez, V., and Yakimido, H., eds. The Evolution of language: Biolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–62.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Cela-Conde, C. J., and Marty, G.. 1998. “Noam Chomsky’s Minimalist Program and the Philosophy of Mind. An Interview.” Syntax 1:19–36.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Lappin, S.. 2011. Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collins, John. 2005a. “Nativism: in Defence of a Biological Understanding.” Philosophical Psychology 18:157–177.Google Scholar
Collins, John. 2005b. “On the Input Problem for Massive Modularity.” Minds and Machines. 15:1–22.Google Scholar
Collins, John. 2014. “Representations Without Representa: Content and Illusion in Linguistic Theory.” In Stalmaszczyk, P., ed. Semantics & Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27–64.Google Scholar
Cowie, Fiona. 1999. What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1981. “The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy.” In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 257–316.Google Scholar
Fodor, J., Bever, T., and Garrett, M.. 1974. The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, T.. 2002. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?” Science 298:1569–1579.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. 1987. “The Autonomy of Syntax and Semantics.” In Garfield, J., ed. Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 119–131.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. 1996. “Learnability, Hyperlearning, and the Poverty of the Stimulus.” Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 498–513.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. 1984. Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. 1989. “Language Acquisition: Growth or Learning?” Philosophical Papers 18:203–240.Google Scholar
References
Barrett, H. C. et al. 2016. “Small-scale Societies Exhibit Fundamental Variation in the Role of Intentions in Moral Judgment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 113:4688–4693.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1983/1736. “A Dissertation on the Nature of Virtue.” In Darwall, S., ed., Five Sermons. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1988b. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. 1983. “Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties.” Mind 92:530–547.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1981/1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, S. 1999. “Moral Competence.” In Murasugi, K. and Stainton, R., eds. Philosophy and Linguistics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Greene, R. 1997. “Instinct of Nature: Natural Law, Synderesis, and the Moral Sense.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58:173–198.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2000. Explaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1984. “Critical Notice: Saul Kripke: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.” Philosophy of Science 51:163–171.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1978/1739–1740. A Treatise of Human Nature. Nidditch, P. H., ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1983/1751. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Schneewind, J. B., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1965/1787. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, N. K.. New York: St. Martins.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1981/1705. New Essays on Human Understanding. Remnant, P. and Bennett, J., eds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1991/1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, P., ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahlmann, M. 1999. Rationalismus in der praktishen Theorie: Normentheorie und praktische Kampetenz. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2007a. “Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence, and the Future.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:143–152.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2007b. “Plucking the Mask of Mystery from Its Face: Jurisprudence and H.L.A. Hart.” Georgetown Law Journal 95:733–779.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2009. “Is the Prohibition of Homicide Universal? Evidence from Comparative Criminal Law.” Brooklyn Law Review 75:497–515.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2012. “Moral Grammar and Human Rights: Some Reflections on Cognitive Science and Enlightenment Rationalism.” In Goodman, R., Jinks, D., and Woods, A., eds. Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2013. “New Perspectives on Moral Cognition: Reply to Zimmerman, Enoch, and Chemla, Egré, and Schlenker.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 8:66–114.Google Scholar
Saxe, R. 2016. “Moral Status of Accidents,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113:4555–4557.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. 1990. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar