Book contents
- Mental Capacity in Relationship
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Mental Capacity in Relationship
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Statutes
- List of Cases
- 1 Problems with Mental Capacity
- 2 Mental Capacity, Legal Capacity, and Relational Rights
- 3 Relational Autonomy and the Promotion of Decisional Capacity
- 4 Procedural Reasoning and the Social Space of Reasons in Capacity Assessments
- 5 Ethical Duties of Support and Intervention
- 6 Hermeneutic Competence and the Dialogical Conditions of Capacity
- 7 Rethinking Capacity
- Appendix 1 Overview of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Inherent Jurisdiction in England and Wales
- Bibliography
- Index
- Series page
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Book contents
- Mental Capacity in Relationship
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Mental Capacity in Relationship
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Statutes
- List of Cases
- 1 Problems with Mental Capacity
- 2 Mental Capacity, Legal Capacity, and Relational Rights
- 3 Relational Autonomy and the Promotion of Decisional Capacity
- 4 Procedural Reasoning and the Social Space of Reasons in Capacity Assessments
- 5 Ethical Duties of Support and Intervention
- 6 Hermeneutic Competence and the Dialogical Conditions of Capacity
- 7 Rethinking Capacity
- Appendix 1 Overview of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Inherent Jurisdiction in England and Wales
- Bibliography
- Index
- Series page
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Mental Capacity in RelationshipDecision-Making, Dialogue, and Autonomy, pp. 241 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Anderson, Joel and Honneth, Axel. ‘Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice’. In John Christman and Joel Anderson. Eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Pp. 127–49.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. ‘Assessment of Patients’ Capacities to Consent to Treatment’. The New England Journal of Medicine 357:18 (2007): 1834–1840.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. and Grisso, Thomas. ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I; Mental Illness and Competence to Consent to Treatment’. Law and Human Behavior 19:2 (1995): 105–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, Paul S. and Grisso, Thomas. ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II; Measures of Abilities Related to Competence to Consent to Treatment’. Law and Human Behavior 19:2 (1995): 127–48.Google Scholar
Atkins, Kim. ‘Autonomy and Autonomy Competencies: A Practical and Relational Approach’. Nursing Philosophy 7 (2006): 205–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach, Michael and Kerzner, Lana. A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity. Ontario: Law Commission of Ontario, 2010.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia and Fahmy, Melissa Seymour. ‘Beneficence and Other Duties of Love in The Metaphysics of Morals’. In Hill, Thomas E., Jr. Ed. The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Pp. 211–28.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Peter. Blackstone's Guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Peter and Sandland, Ralph. Mental Heath Law: Policy and Practice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. Standing on Principles: Collected Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F.. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Benaroyo, Lazare and Widdershoven, Guy. ‘Competence in Mental Health Care: A Hermeneutic Approach’. Health Care Analysis 12:4 (2004): 295–306.Google Scholar
Benson, Paul. ‘Autonomy and Oppressive Socialization’. Social Theory and Practice 17 (1991): 385–408.Google Scholar
Benson, Paul. ‘Free Agency and Self-Worth’. Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994): 650–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Paul. ‘Feeling Crazy; Self-Worth and the Social Character of Responsibility’. In Catriona, Mackenzie and Stoljar, Natalie. Eds. Relational Autonomy; Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Pp. 72–93.Google Scholar
Benson, Paul. ‘Feminist Intuitions and the Normative Substance of Autonomy’. In Taylor, J. S.. Ed. Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Pp. 133–7.Google Scholar
Bermúdez, José L. ‘Normativity and Rationality in Delusional Psychiatric Disorders’. Mind & Language 16:5 (2001): 457–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogden, Robert and Taylor, Steven J.. ‘Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness’. Social Problems 36 (1989): 135–48.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit; Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. ‘Review: Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55:4 (1995): 895–908.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. Articulating Reasons; An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. ‘Reply to Charles Taylor's “Language Not Mysterious?”’ In Weiss, Bernhard and Wanderer, Jeremy, Eds. Reading Brandom on Making It Explicit. Pp. 301–4.Google Scholar
Brownlee, K. and Cureton, A.. Eds. Disability and Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen E. and Brock, Dan W.. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Buss, S. and Overton, L.. Eds. Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2002.Google Scholar
Cave, Emma. ‘Determining Capacity to Make Medical Treatment Decisions: Problems Implementing the Mental Capacity Act 2005’. Statute Law Review 36:1 (2015): 86–106.Google Scholar
Charland, Louis C. ‘Is Mr. Spock Mentally Competent? Competence to Consent and Emotion’. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5:1 (1998): 67–81.Google Scholar
Charles, J. ‘New Guidance issued on Facilitating Participation of “‘P’” and Vulnerable Persons in Court of Protection Proceedings’. November 2016. Available at: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/system/froala_assets/documents/1245/Practice_Guidance_Vulnerable_Persons.pdf Accessed 15 November 2016.Google Scholar
Christman, John. ‘Autonomy and Personal History’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1991): 1–24.Google Scholar
Christman, John. ‘Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves’. Philosophical Studies 117 (2004): 143–63.Google Scholar
Christman, John and Anderson, Joel. Eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigie, Jillian. ‘Competence, Practical Rationality and What a Patient Values’. Bioethics 25:6 (2011): 326–33.Google Scholar
Craigie, Jillian and Coram, Alicia. ‘Irrationality, Mental Capacities, and Neuroscience’. In Vincent, Nicole A.. Ed. Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility. Pp. 85–109.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. ‘Internalism and Agency’. Philosophical Perspectives 6, Ethics (1992): 155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L. The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, Michelle Madden. Prosecuting Domestic Violence; A Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Department of Constitutional Affairs. Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. London: TSO, 2007.Google Scholar
Dhanda, A. ‘Constructing a New Human Rights Lexicon: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Sur – Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos 5 (2008): 42–59.Google Scholar
Dodds, Susan. ‘Dependence, Care, and Vulnerability’. In Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Pp. 181–202.Google Scholar
Donchin, Anne. ‘Understanding Autonomy Relationally: Toward a Reconfiguration of Bioethical Principles’. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2001): 365–86.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Mary. ‘Capacity Assessment under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Delivering on the Functional Approach?’ Legal Studies 29:3 (2009): 464–91.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Mary. Healthcare Decision-Making and the Law: Autonomy, Capacity and the Limits of Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dresser, Rebecca. ‘Dworkin on Dementia: Elegant Theory, Questionable Policy’. Hastings Center Report 25: 6 (1995): 32–8.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. Skillful Coping; Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Taylor, Charles. Retrieving Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael C. ‘When Are Adult Safeguarding Interventions Justified?’ In Wallbank, J. and Herring., J. Eds. Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. Pp. 234–53.Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine. ‘Unlocking Human Dignity: Towards a Theory for the 21st Century’. European Human Rights Law Review 2 (2009): 190–205.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. ‘Autonomy and Behavior Control’. Hastings Center Report 6 (1976): 23–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, Gerald. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Natural Law Revisited’. University of Florida Law Review 34:2 (1981–82): 165–88.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Rights as Trumps’. In Kavanagh, Aileen and Oberdiek, John. Eds. Arguing about the Law. Pp. 335–44.Google Scholar
Eldergill, Anselm. ‘Compassion and the Law: A Judicial Perspective’. Elder Law Journal [2015]: 268–78.Google Scholar
Ells, Carolyn. ‘Lessons about Autonomy from the Experience of Disability’. Social Theory and Practice 27 (2001): 599–615.Google Scholar
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Human Rights Review 2012; How Fair Is Britain? An Assessment of How Well Public Authorities Protect Human Rights. EHRC, 2012.Google Scholar
Erler, Alexandre and Hope, Tony. ‘Mental Disorder and the Concept of Authenticity’. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21:3 (2014): 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin and Mark Ravizza, S.J. Responsibility and Control; A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value’. University of Western Ontario Law Review 22 (1984): 171–82.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’. Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971): 5–20.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. ‘Autonomy and the Split-Level Self’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (1986): 19–35.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd ed. Trans. Winsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. London: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Sanford. ‘Comments on Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Justice’. Episteme 7 (2010): 138–50.Google Scholar
Gooding, Piers. ‘Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and Its Implications for Mental Health Law’. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 20 (2014): 431–51.Google Scholar
Grisso, Thomas, Applebaum, Paul S., and Hill-Fotouhi, Carolyn. ‘The MacCat-T: A Clinical Tool to Assess Patients’ Capacities to Make Treatment Decisions’. Psychiatric Services 48:11 (1997): 1415–19.Google Scholar
Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer. Trans. Plant, Kathryn. Chesham: Acumen, 2003.Google Scholar
Hale, Brenda. ‘Dignity’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 31 (2009): 101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpur, Paul David. ‘Embracing the New Disability Rights Paradigm: The Importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Disability and Society 27:1 (2012): 1–14.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hill, Jr . Thomas, E. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hill, Jr . Thomas, E., Ed. The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009,Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition; The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Trans. Anderson, Joel. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.Google Scholar
Hope, Tony, Tan, Jacinta, Stewart, Anne, and Fitzpatrick, Ray. ‘Anorexia Nervosa and the Language of Authenticity’. Hastings Center Report 41:6 (2011): 19–29.Google Scholar
Hope, Tony, Tan, Jacinta, Stewart, Anne, and McMillan, John. ‘Agency, Ambivalence and Authenticity: The Many Ways in Which Anorexia Nervosa Can Affect Autonomy’. International Journal of Law in Context 9:1 (2013): 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotopf, Matthew. ‘The Assessment of Mental Capacity’. Clinical Medicine 5:6 (2005): 580–4.Google Scholar
Jaworska, Agnieszka. ‘Respecting the Margins of Agency: Alzheimer's Patients and the Capacity to Value’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 28:2 (1999): 105–38.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Paton, H. J.. London: Routledge, 1948.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Gregor, Mary Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Aileen and Oberdiek, John. Eds. Arguing about the Law. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Kayess, R. and French, P.. ‘Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Human Rights Law Review 8:1 (2008): 1–34.Google Scholar
Killmister, Suzy. ‘Dignity – Not Such a Useless Concept’. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (2010): 160–4.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia. Eds. Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Kong, Camillia. ‘The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2012): 661–90.Google Scholar
Kong, Camillia. ‘Beyond the Balancing Scales: The Importance of Prejudice and Dialogue in A Local Authority v E and Others’. Child and Family Law Quarterly 26:2 (2014): 216–36.Google Scholar
Kong, Camillia. ‘The Space between Second-Personal Respect and Rational Care in Theory and Mental Health Law’. Law and Philosophy 34 (2015): 433–67.Google Scholar
Kong, Camillia. ‘The Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Article 12: Prospective Feminist Lessons against the “Will and Preferences” Paradigm’. Laws 4 (2015): 709–28.Google Scholar
Kupfner, Joseph. ‘The Moral Perspective of Humility’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2003): 249–269.Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola. Unspeakable Subjects; Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, 1998.Google Scholar
The Law Commission. Mentally Incapacitated Adults and Decision-Making: Medical Treatment and Research. Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 129, 1993.Google Scholar
The Law Commission. Mental Incapacity; Item 9 of the Fourth Programme of Law Reform: Mentally Incapacitated Adults. Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 231, 1995.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Entre Nous. Trans. Smith, Michael and Harshav, Barbara. London: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. ‘The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability’. In Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Pp. 33–59.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Eds. Relational Autonomy; Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Marzola, Enrica, Abbate-Daga, Giovanni, Gamaglia, Carla, Amianto, Federico, and Fassino, Secondo. ‘A Qualitative Investigation into Anorexia Nervosa: The Inner Perspective’. Cogent Psychology 2:1 (2015).Google Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher. ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’. European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 655–724.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. ‘Knowledge and the Internal’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55:4 (1995): 877–93.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. ‘Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and Justice’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1996): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. ‘Radical Cognitive Limitation’. In Brownlee, K. and Cureton, A.. Eds. Disability and Disadvantage. Pp. 240–259.Google Scholar
Mencap. Death by Indifference: Following Up the Treat Me Right! Report. London: Mencap, 2007.Google Scholar
Mencap. Death by Indifference: 74 Deaths and Counting; A Progress Report 5 Years On. London: Mencap, 2012.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. Self, Society, and Personal Choice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. ‘Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self?: Opposites Attract!’ In Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Eds. Relational Autonomy; Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Pp. 151–80.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. ‘Book Review of Oshana's Personal Autonomy in Society’. Hypatia 23 (2008): 202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynen, Gerben. ‘Depression, Possibilities, and Competence: A Phenomenological Perspective’. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32:3 (2011): 181–91.Google Scholar
Meynen, Gerben and Widdershoven, Guy. ‘Competence in Health Care: An Abilities-based versus a Pathology-based Approach’. Clinical Ethics 7 (2012): 39–44.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jonathan. ‘Health Care in Multi-Faith Society’. In Murphy, John. Ed. Ethnic Minorities, Their Families and the Law. Pp. 161–79.Google Scholar
Moore, Catriona. Living with Rett Syndrome [blog].Google Scholar
Nakazawa, Donna Jackson. Childhood Disrupted: How Your Biography Becomes Your Biology and How You Can Heal. New York: Atria, 2015.Google Scholar
Higashida, Naoki. The Reason I Jump. Trans. Yoshida, K. A. and Mitchell, David. London: Sceptre, 2007.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. Damaged Identities; Narrative Repair. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Upheavals of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2007.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. ‘Between Consenting Adults’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985): 252–77.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Oshana, Marina. ‘Personal Autonomy and Society’. Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (1998): 81–102.Google Scholar
Oshana, Marina. ‘The Misguided Marriage of Responsibility and Autonomy’. Journal of Ethics 6 (2002): 261–80.Google Scholar
Oshana, Marina. ‘How Much Should We Value Autonomy?’ Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2003): 99–126.Google Scholar
Press Association. ‘More Parents in England Prosecuted for Taking Children out of School’. The Guardian. 12 August 2015.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Sachs, David. ‘How to Distinguish Self-Respect from Self-Esteem’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10:4 (1981): 346--60.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. Moral Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeman, Ferdinand David. Ed. Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. ‘Kant's Conception of Human Dignity’. Kant-Studien 100 (2009): 309–31.Google Scholar
Siebrasse, Norman. ‘Malette v. Shulman: The Requirement of Consent in Medical Emergencies’. McGill Law Journal 34 (1989): 1080–98.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. ‘Speciesism and Moral Status’. In Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia. Eds. Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Pp. 331–44.Google Scholar
Sneiderman, Barney ‘The Shulman Case and the Right to Refuse Treatment’, Humane Medicine 7:1 (1991): 15–21.Google Scholar
Stavert, Jill. ‘UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Possible Implications for Scotland for Persons with Mental Disorders’. Scottish Human Rights Journal 47 (2009).Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. ‘Control and Causal Determinism’. In Buss, S. and Overton, L.. Eds. Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes From Harry Frankfurt. Pp. 33–60.Google Scholar
Tan, Jacinta O. A., Hope, Tony, Stewart, Anne, and Fitzpatrick, Raymond. ‘Competence to Make Treatment Decisions in Anorexia Nervosa: Thinking Processes and Values’. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13:4 (2006): 267–82.Google Scholar
Tan, Jacinta, Hope, Tony, and Stewart, Anne. ‘Competence to Refuse Treatment in Anorexia Nervosa’. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 26 (2003): 697–707.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Dilemmas and Connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. S. Ed. Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Thalberg, Irving. ‘Hierarchical Analyses of Unfree Action’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 211–26.Google Scholar
Thomas, Carol. ‘Rescuing a Social Relational Understanding of Disability’. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 6 (2004): 22–36.Google Scholar
United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. General Comment No. 1 – Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law UN Doc. No. CRPD/C/GC/1, adopted at the 11th Session. April 2014.Google Scholar
van de Ven, Leontine, Post, Marcel, de Witte, Luc, and van den Heuvel, Wim. ‘It Takes Two to Tango: The Integration of People with Disabilities into Society’. Disability & Society 20 (2005): 311–29.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David. ‘The Possibility of Practical Reason’. Ethics 106:4 (1996): 694–726.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nicole A. Ed. Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wallbank, J. and Herring, J.. Eds. Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernhard and Wanderer, Jeremy. Eds. Reading Brandom on Making It Explicit. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck; Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. ‘Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility’. In Schoeman, Ferdinand David. Ed. Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. Freedom within Reason. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar