This chapter deals with the problem of distributing retributive desert. We begin with preliminary presuppositions about retributive desert. We then turn to distributive puzzles. First, we address the intersection of the means principle and retributive desert, arguing that the means principle bars not only the creation of crime to create the intrinsic goodness of giving people what they deserve but also that the means principle prevents taxing citizens to pay for retributive desert if they do not believe that it is intrinsically good. Second, we ask whether retributive desert determines what the form of suffering must be, what the timing of punishment should be, and how to select among the deserving in a world of scarce resources. We next turn to puzzles in which prior distributions might affect the distribution of desert. There is the familiar problem of different susceptibility to punishment. We also ask what would make a harm ineligible for counting as retributive desert. Finally, we discuss the relationship between negative and positive desert.