Abelson, Philip H., ‘Knowledge and power: science in the service of society’ in Lakoff (ed.), Knowledge and Power, pp. 469–82.Google Scholar

Agar, Jon, Science in the twentieth century and beyond, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Albrecht, Ulrich, ‘Military technology and National Socialist ideology’ in Renneberg and Walker (eds.), Science, technology and National Socialism, pp. 88–125.Google Scholar

Alder, Ken, ‘A revolution to measure: the political economy of the metric system in France’ in Wise, M. N. (ed.), Values of precision, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 39–71.Google Scholar

Alder, Ken, Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763–1815, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Allen, Douglas W., The institutional revolution: Measurement and the economic emergence of the modern world, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Alter, Peter, The reluctant patron: science and the state in Britain, 1850–1920, Oxford: Berg, 1987.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict, Imagined communities: reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism, London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar

Andrews, James T., Science for the masses: The Bolshevik state, public science, and the popular imagination in Soviet Russia, 1917–1934, College Station: Texas A&M University, 2003.Google Scholar

Anon, , Baconiana Bibliographica: or certain remains of the Lord Bacon concerning his writings, London, 1679.Google Scholar

Appel, Toby, Shaping Biology: The National Science Foundation and American Biological Research, 1945–1975, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Arnold, David, The new Cambridge history of India, vol. III (5):Science, technology and medicine in colonial India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Arnold, David, ‘Nehruvian science and postcolonial India’, Isis, 104, 2013, 360–70.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Lewis E., ‘Scientists in the new deal: a pre-war episode in the relations between science and government in the United States’, Minerva, 3 (4), 1965, 457–82.Google Scholar

Azzolini, Monica, The duke and the stars: astrology and politics in Renaissance Milan, Boston: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baber, Zaheer, The science of empire: Scientific knowledge, civilization, and colonial rule in India, Albany: Albany State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, The works of Francis Bacon, (eds.) Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie and Heath, Douglas Denon, Boston: Brown and Taggard, 1861–4, 1900.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis, The advancement of learning and the new Atlantis, London: Oxford University Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael (ed.), Condorcet: Selected writings, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976.Google Scholar

Barrera-Osorio, Antonio, Experiencing nature: the Spanish American empire and the early scientific revolution, Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Barrera-Osorio, Antonio ‘Knowledge and empiricism in the sixteenth-century Spanish Atlantic world’ in Bleichmar, De Vos, Huffine and Sheehan (eds.), Science, pp. 219–32.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, James R., The formation of science in Japan: Building a research tradition, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, James R. ‘Science in twentieth-century Japan’ in Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 839–96.Google Scholar

Basu, Aparna, ‘The Indian response to scientific and technical education in the colonial era, 1820–1920’ in Kumar (ed.), Science and Empire, pp. 126–38.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank and Wilsford, David, ‘France: science within the state’ in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 63–91.Google Scholar

Baxter, James Phinney, Scientists against time, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Bayly, C. A., Imperial meridian: the British empire and the world, 1780–1830, London: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar

Bedini, Silvio A., Thomas Jefferson: Statesman of science, New York: Macmillan, 1990.Google Scholar

Bennett, Brett M. and Hodge, Joseph M. (eds.), Science and empire: Knowledge and networks of science across the British Empire, 1800–1970, Houndmills: Palgrave, 2011.Google Scholar

Ben-David, Joseph, Centers of Learning: Britain, France, Germany, United States, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar

Benson, Keith R., ‘Field stations and surveys’ in Bowler and Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 6, pp. 76–89.Google Scholar

Berman, Morris, Social change and scientific organization: The Royal Institution, 1799–1844, London: Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar

Beyerchen, Alan, Science under Hitler, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Beyerchen, Alan, ‘On the stimulation of excellence in Wilhelmian science’ in Dukes, Jack R. and Remak, Joachim (eds.), Another Germany: A Reconsideration of the Imperial Era, London: Westview Press, 1988, pp. 139–68.Google Scholar

Beyler, Richard H., ‘Maintaining discipline in the Kaiser Wilhelm Society during the National Socialist regime’, Minerva, 44, 2006, 25–66.Google Scholar

Beyler, Richard, Kojevnikov, Alexei and Wang, Jessica, ‘Purges in comparative perspective: rules for exclusion and inclusion in the scientific community under political pressure’, Osiris, 20, 2005, 23–48.Google Scholar

Biagioli, Mario, ‘Scientific Revolution, social bricolage and etiquette’ in Porter, Roy and Teich, Mikuláš (eds.), The Scientific Revolution, pp. 11–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biagioli, Mario, Galileo, courtier the practice of science in the culture of absolutism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 11–54.Google Scholar

Bleichmar, Daniela, ‘A visible and useful empire. Visual culture and colonial natural history in the eighteenth-century Spanish world’ in Daniela Bleichmar, Paul De Vos, Kristin Huffine, Kevin Sheehan (eds.), Science, pp. 290–310.Google Scholar

Bleichmar, Daniela, De Vos, Huffine, Paula, Kristin and Sheehan, Kevin (eds.), Science in the Spanish and Portuguese Empires, 1500–1800, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bonneuil, Christophe, ‘Development as experiment: science and state building in late colonial and postcolonial Africa, 1930–1970’, Osiris, 15, 2000, 258–81.Google Scholar

Boschiero, Luciano, ‘Natural philosophizing inside the late seventeenth-century Tuscan court’, British Journal for the History of Science, 35 (4), 2002, 383–410.Google Scholar

Boschiero, Luciano Experiment and natural philosophy in seventeenth-century Tuscany. The history of the Accademia del Cimento, Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J. and Morus, Iwan Rhys, Making modern science: a historical survey, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J. and Pickstone, John V. (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 6. Modern life and earth sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Brewer, John, The sinews of power: War, money and the English state, 1688-1783, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Brewer, John, ‘The eighteenth-century British state. Contexts and issues’ in Stone, Lawrence (ed.), An imperial state at war: Britain from 1689 to 1815, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 52–71.Google Scholar

Brockway, Lucile H., Science and colonial expansion: the role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens, New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Brooks, Nathan M., ‘Munitions, the military and chemistry in Russia’ in MacLeod, R. and Johnson, J. A. (eds.), Frontline and factory, pp. 75–101.Google Scholar

Bruce, Robert V., The launching of modern American science 1846–1876, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1987.Google Scholar

Bulmer, Martin, ‘Knowledge institutionalized: higher education and philanthropic foundations’, Minerva, 40, 2002, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, William E., The scientific revolution in global perspective, Oxford: New York, 2016.Google Scholar

Bush, Vannevar (ed.), Science – the endless frontier, Washington, DC: US Office of Scientific Research and Development, 1960.Google Scholar

Cahan, David, ‘Institutional revolution in German physics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 15 (2), 1985, 1–65.Google Scholar

Cahan, David, An institute for an empire: the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871–1918, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge, Nature, empire, and nation: explorations of the history of science in the Iberian world, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cardwell, D. S. L., The organisation of science in England, London: Heinemann, 1972.Google Scholar

Carroll, Patrick, Science, culture and modern state formation, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006,Google Scholar

Chambers, David Wade, ‘Period and process in colonial and national science’ in Reingold, Nathan and Rothenberg, Marc (eds.), Scientific colonialism: a cross-cultural comparison, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press, pp. 297–321.Google Scholar

Chauvreau, Sophie, ‘Mobilization and industrial policy: chemicals and pharmaceuticals in the French war effort’ in R. MacLeod and J. A. Johnson (eds.), Frontline and factory, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar

Clark, Roland W., The rise of the boffins, London: Phoenix House, 1962.Google Scholar

Clarke, Sabine, ‘Pure science with a practical aim: the meanings of fundamental research in Britain, circa 1916–1950, Isis, 101:2, 2010, 285–311.Google Scholar

Clarke, Sabine, ‘“The chance to send their first class men out to the colonies”: the making of the colonial research service’ in Bennett and Hodge (eds.), Science and empire, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar

Close, Charles, The early years of the Ordnance Survey, Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1969.Google Scholar

Coben, Stanley, ‘American foundations as patrons of science: the commitment to individual research’ in Reingold (ed.), The sciences in the American context, pp. 229–48.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Rexmond, The National Academy of Sciences: The first hundred years 1863–1963, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1978.Google Scholar

Cock, A. G., ‘Chauvinism and internationalism in science: The International Research Council, 1919–1926’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 37 (2), 1983, 249–88.Google Scholar

Cohn, Bernard, Colonialism and its forms of knowledge. The British in India, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Coopersmith, Jonathan, ‘The role of the military in the electrification of Russia, 1870–1890’ in Mendelsohn, Smith and Weingart (eds.), Science, technology and the military, II, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar

Cormack, Lesley, ‘Twisting the lion’s tail: practice and theory at the court of Henry Prince of Wales’ in Moran (ed.), Patronage and institutions, pp. 67–83.Google Scholar

Crawford, Elisabeth, ‘The universe of international science, 1880–1939’ in Tore Frängsmyr (ed.), Solomon’s House revisited, pp. 251–69.Google Scholar

Crosland, Maurice, ‘The congress on definitive metric standards, 1798–1799: The first international scientific conference?’, Isis, 60 (2), 1969, 226–31.Google Scholar

Crosland, Maurice, ‘The French Academy of Sciences in the nineteenth century’, Minerva, 16 (1), 1978, 73–102.Google Scholar

Crosland, Maurice, Science under control the French Academy of Sciences, 1795–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cudworth, Erika, Hall, Timothy and Mc Govern, John (eds.), The modern state. Theories and ideologies, Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Daniels, George (ed.), Nineteenth-century American science. A reappraisal, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, ‘Nationalism and scientific neutrality under Napoleon’ in Frängsmyr (ed.), Solomon’s house, pp. 95–119.Google Scholar

Day, C. R., ‘Education for the industrial world: technical and modern instruction in France under the Third Republic, 1870–1914’ in Fox and Weisz (eds.), The organization of science, pp. 127–53.Google Scholar

Dean, Warren, ‘The green wave of coffee: beginnings of tropical agricultural research in Brazil (1885–1900), The Hispanic American Historical Review, 69 (1) 91–115.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter, Revolutionizing the science: European knowledge and its ambitions, 1500–1700, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar

De Sauvigny, Guillaume De Bertier, ‘Science et politique sous la Restauration’, History and technology, 5 (2–4), 1988, 273–99.Google Scholar

Deichmann, Ute, Biologists under Hitler, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Deichmann, Ute and Muller-Hill, Benno, ‘Biological research at universities and Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes in Nazi Germany’ in Renneberg and Walker (eds.), Science, technology and national socialism, pp. 160–83.Google Scholar

Devles, Daniel, ‘On the flaws of American physics: a social and institutional analysis’, in George Daniels (ed.), Nineteenth-century American science, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar

Dmytryshyn, Basil, Crownhart-Vaughan, E. and Vaughan, T. (eds.), Russian penetration of the North Pacific Ocean, 1700–1790: a documentary record, Eugene: Oregon Historical Society Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Dorn, Harold, The geography of science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1991.Google Scholar

Drayton, Richard, Nature’s government: science, imperial Britain, and the ‘improvement’ of the world, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dunmore, John (ed.), The journal of Jean-François de Galaup de la Pérouse, 1785–1788, London: Hakluyt Society, 2002.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. Stefan and Lakoff, Sanford A., Science and the nation. Policy and politics, Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google Scholar

Dupree, A. Hunter, Science and the emergence of modern America 1865–1916 Chicago: Rand Mc Nally, 1963.Google Scholar

Dupree, A. Hunter, Science in the federal government: a history of policies and activities to 1940, New York: Harper & Row, 1964.Google Scholar

Dupree, A. Hunter, ‘The national pattern of American learned societies, 1769–1863’ in Oleson, Alexandra and Brown, Sanborn C. (eds.), The pursuit of knowledge in the early American Republic: American scientific and learned societies from colonial times to the Civil War, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1976, pp. 21–32.Google Scholar

Dyson, Kenneth H. F., The state tradition in Western Europe: A study of an idea and institution, Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980.Google Scholar

Eamon, William, ‘Court, academy and printing house: patronage and scientific careers in late Renaissance Italy’ in Moran (ed.), Patronage and institutions, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar

Eastwood, , ‘“Amplifying the province of the legislature”: the flow of information and the English state in the nineteenth century’, Historical research, 62, 1989, 276–94.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David, ‘Science and war’ in Olby, Cantor, Christie and Hodge (eds.), Companion to the history of modern science, pp. 920–33.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David, ‘Science in the United Kingdom. A study of the nationalization of science’ in John Krige and Dominique Pestre (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 759–76.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David, ‘British scientific intellectuals and the relations of science, technology and war’ in Forman and Sánchez-Ron, National military establishments, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Edgerton, David, Britain’s war machine: weapons, resources, and experts in the Second World War, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. H., Imperial Spain, 1469–1716, London: Edward Arnold, 1963.Google Scholar

Elman, Benjamin A., A cultural history of modern science in China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Epstein, Joel J., Francis Bacon: a political biography, Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Eriksson, Gunnar, ‘Commentary’ in Frängsmyr (ed.), Solomon’s House, pp. 31–5.Google Scholar

Fan, Fa-ti, British naturalists in Qing China.Science, empire and cultural encounter, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fan, Fa-ti, ‘Science, state, and citizens: notes from another shore’, Osiris, 27 (1), 2012, 227–49.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula, ‘Economy of scientific exchange in early modern Italy’ in Moran (ed.), Patronage and institutions, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula, Possessing nature: Museums, collecting, and scientific culture in early modern Italy, University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula, ‘Cabinets, collections and natural philosophy’ in Eliška, Fučíková et al. (eds.), Rudolf II and Prague: the court and the city, London: Thames and Hudson, 1997, pp. 201–19.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula, ‘Anatomy theatres, botanical gardens, and natural history collections’ in Park, and Daston, (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 3, pp. 272–89.Google Scholar

Finn, Stephen J., Thomas Hobbes and the politics of natural philosophy, London: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

Fischer, Wolfram and Lundgreen, Peter, ‘Recruitment and training of administrative and technical personnel’ in Tilly, Charles (ed.), The formation of national states, pp. 456–651.Google Scholar

Foote, George A., ‘The place of science in the British reform movement 1830–50’, Isis, 42 (3), 1951, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Forman, Paul, ‘Scientific internationalism and the Weimar physicists: the ideology and its manipulation in Germany after World War I’, Isis, 64 (2), 1973, 150–80.Google Scholar

Forman, Paul, ‘The financial support and political alignment of physicists in Weimar Germany’, Minerva, 12 (1), 1974, 39–66.Google Scholar

Forman, Paul and Sánchez-Ron, José M. (eds.), National military establishments and the advancement of science and technology: studies in 20th century history, Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Stephen, Science policy in the Soviet Union, London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Fox, Robert, ‘Scientific enterprise and the patronage of research in France 1800–70’, Minerva, 11 (4), 1973, 442–73.Google Scholar

Fox, Robert, ‘Science and government’ in Porter (ed.), Eighteenth-century science, pp. 107–28.Google Scholar

Fox, Robert, The savant and the state: science and cultural politics in nineteenth-century France, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Fox, Robert and Weisz, George (ed.), The organization of science and technology in France, 1808–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Frängsmyr, Tore (ed.), Solomon’s House revisited: the organisation and institutionalisation of science, Canton: Science History Publications, 1990.Google Scholar

Frängsmyr, Tore, Heilbron, J. L. and Rider, Robin E. (eds.), The quantifying spirit in the eighteenth century, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Frates da Costa, Palmira and Leitāo, Henrique, ‘Portuguese imperial science, 1450–1800: A historiographical review’, in Daniela Bleichmar, Paul De Vos, Kristin Huffine and Kevin Sheehan (eds.), Science, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Frieman, Wendy, ‘People’s Republic of China: between autarky and interdependence’ in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 127–144.Google Scholar

Galbreath, Ross, DSIR. Making science work for New Zealand, Wellington: Victoria University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John, ‘A reappraisal of the role of the universities in the Scientific Revolution’ in Lindberg, D. C. and Westman, R. S. (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 207–60.Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John, Science in the service of empire: Joseph Banks, the British state and the uses of science in the age of revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John, ‘Joseph Banks, mapping and the geographies of natural knowledge’ in Ogden, Miles and Withers, Charles (eds.), Georgian geographies: Essays on space, place and landscape in the eighteenth century, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004, pp. 151–73.Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John, ‘The Royal Society, natural history and the peoples of the “New World(s)”, 1660–1800’, British Journal for the History of Science, 42 (4), 2009. 539–62.Google Scholar

Gascoigne, John, ‘Crossing the pillars of Hercules: Francis Bacon, the scientific revolution and the New World’ in Gal, Ofer and Chen-Morris, Raz (eds.), Baroque Science, Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 217–38.Google Scholar

Gal, Ofer and Chen-Morris, Raz ‘Science and the British empire from its beginnings to 1850’ in Bennett and Hodge (eds.), Science and empire, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar

Gal, Ofer and Chen-Morris, Raz Encountering the Pacific in the age of the Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Gal, Ofer and Chen-Morris, Raz ‘From science to religion: justifying French Pacific voyaging and expansion in the period of the Restoration and the July Monarchy’, Journal of Pacific History, 50, 2015, 109–27.Google Scholar

Gaukroger, Stephen, Francis Bacon and the transformation of early-modern philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gaukroger, Stephen, The emergence of a scientific culture: Science and the shaping of modernity, 1210–1685, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Genuth, Joel, ‘Groping towards science policy in the United States in the 1930s’, Minerva, 25 (3), 1987, 238–68.Google Scholar

Geyer-Kordesch, Johanna, ‘Court physicians and state regulation in eighteenth-century Prussia: the emergence of medical science and the demystification of the body’ in Nutton (ed.), Medicine at the courts, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Gillispie, Charles, ‘Science and politics, with special reference to Revolutionary and Napoleonic France’, History of Technology, 4, 1987, 213–23.Google Scholar

Gillispie, Charles, Science and polity in France: The Revolutionary and Napoleonic years, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, David, ‘Scientific empire and imperial science: colonialism and irrigation technology in the Indus basin’, The journal of Asian studies, 53 (4), 1994, 1127–49.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, France in the age of the scientific state, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Glass, D. V., ‘John Graunt and his natural and political observations’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 19 (1), 1964, 63–100.Google Scholar

Gleason, Mary, The Royal Society of London, years of reform 1827–1847, New York: Garland, 1991.Google Scholar

Godlewska, Anne, Geography unbound: French geographic science from Cassini to Humboldt, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Goodman, David, ‘Philip II’s patronage of science and engineering’, The British journal for the history of science, 16 (1), 1983, 49–66.Google Scholar

Goodman, David, Power and penury: government, technology, and science in Philip II’s Spain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Goodman, David, ‘Science, medicine and technology in Colonial Spanish America. New interpretations, new approaches’ in Bleichmar, De Vos, Huffine, Kristin and Sheehan (eds.), Science in the Spanish and Portuguese empires, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar

Goodman, David and Russell, Colin A., The rise of scientific Europe, 1500–1800, Milton Keynes: Open University, 1991.Google Scholar

Gordin, Michael D., ‘The importation of being earnest: The early St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences’, Isis, 91 (1), 2000, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren, The Soviet Academy of Sciences and the Communist Party, 1927–1932, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren, ‘Development of science policy in the Soviet Union’ in Long, Dixon T. and Wright, Christopher,(eds.), Science policies of industrial nations, New York: Praeger, 1975, pp.12–58.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren, Science, philosophy, and human behaviour in the Soviet Union, New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren, Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A short history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren, What have we learned about science and technology from the Russian experience?, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren and Dezhina, Irina, Science in the new Russia: Crisis, aid, reform, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Gray, George W., Science at war, Freeport: Books for Libraries, 1972.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Daniel S., The politics of pure science, New York: 1969.Google Scholar

Grove, J. W., In defence of science: science, technology, and politics in modern society, University of Toronto Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Grunden, Walter E., Kawamura, Yutaka, Kolchinsky, Eduard, Maier, Helmut and Yamazaki, Masakatsu, ‘Laying the foundation for wartime research: a comparative overview of science mobilization in National Socialist Germany, Japan, and the Soviet Union’, Osiris, 20, 2005, 79–106.Google Scholar

Guerlac, Henry E., ‘Science and French national strength’ in Earle, E. (ed.), Modern France, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 81–105.Google Scholar

Gummett, Philip, Scientists in Whitehall, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gustafson, Thane, ‘Why doesn’t Soviet science do better than it does?’ In Lubrao, Linds L. and Solomon, Susan Gross (eds.), The social context of Soviet science, Boulder: Westview, 1980, pp. 31–67.Google Scholar

Haber, L. F., ‘Government intervention at the frontiers of science: British dyestuffs and synthetic organic chemicals 1914–39’, Minerva, 11 (1), 1973, 79–94.Google Scholar

Hahn, Roger, The anatomy of a scientific institution: the Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Hahn, Roger, ‘The age of academies’ in Frängsmyr (ed.), Solomon’s House, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar

Hahn, Roger, ‘Louis XIV’s science policy’ in David, Rubin (ed.), Sun King: The ascendancy of French culture during the reign of Louis XIV, Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1992, pp. 195–207.Google Scholar

Hall, A. R., ‘Gunnery, science and the Royal Society’ in Burke, John G. (ed.), The uses of science in the age of Newton, Berkeley, 1983, pp. 111–42.Google Scholar

Hall, M. B., All scientists now: The Royal Society in the nineteenth century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Hamblin, Jacob Darwin, ‘Visions of international scientific cooperation: the case of oceanic science’, Minerva, 38, 2000, 393–423.Google Scholar

Harrison, Carol E., ‘Projections of the Revolutionary nation: French expeditions in the Pacific, 1791–1803’, Osiris, 24 (1), 2009, 33–52.Google Scholar

Harrison, Carol E. and Johnson, Ann, ‘Introduction: science and national identity’, Osiris, 24 (1), 2009, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Hartcup, Guy, The war of invention. Scientific developments, 1914–18, London: Brassy, 1988.Google Scholar

Hartcup, Guy, Effect of science on the Second World War, Houndmills: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar

Harwood, Jonathan, ‘Universities’ in Bowler and Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 6, pp. 90–107.Google Scholar

Hayton, Darin, The crown and the cosmos: Astrology and the politics of Maximilian I, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Headrick, Daniel, Tools of empire: Technology and European imperialism in the nineteenth century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Headrick, Daniel The tentacles of progress. Technology transfer in the age of imperialism, 1850–1940, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Heilbron, John L., ‘The measure of enlightenment’ in Frängsmyr, Heilbron and Rider (eds.), The quantifying spirit, pp. 207–19.Google Scholar

Heim, Susanne, Sachse, Carola and Walker, Mark (eds.), The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under National Socialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hevly, Bruce, ‘The tools of science: radio, rockets, and the science of naval warfare’ in Forman and Sánchez-Ron (eds.), National military establishments, pp. 215–32.Google Scholar

Higgs, Edward, ‘The struggle for the occupational census, 1841–1911’ in MacLeod, Roy (ed.), Government and expertise: Specialists, administrators and professionals, 1860–1919, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar

Higueras, Maria Dolores, The northwest coast of America: iconographic album of the Malaspina expedition, Madrid: Muso Naval, 1991.Google Scholar

Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane, ‘Invention and the state in 18th-Century France’, Technology and culture, 32 (4), 1991, 911–31.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed., Macpherson, C. B., Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Hodge, Joseph M., ‘Science and empire: an overview of the historical scholarship’ in Bennett and Hodge (eds.), Science and empire, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Dieter, ‘Between autonomy and accommodation: the German Physical Society during the Third Reich’, Physics in Perspective, 7, 2005, 293–329.Google Scholar

Holloway, David, ‘Entering the arms race: the Soviet decision to build the atomic bomb, 1939–45’, Social Studies of Science, 11 (2), 1981, 159–97.Google Scholar

Holloway, David, Stalin and the bomb: The Soviet Union and atomic energy 1939–1956, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hughes, Arnold, ‘The nation-state in Black Africa’ in Tivey (ed.), The nation-state, pp. 122–47.Google Scholar

Hunter, Michael, Science and society in Restoration science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Hunter, Michael, ‘First steps in institutionalization: the role of the Royal Society of London’ in Frängsmyr (ed.), Solomon’s House, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric, ‘Scientists and civil servants: the struggle over the National Physical Laboratory in 1918’, Minerva, 7 (3), 1969, 373–98.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric, ‘Scientists as an inferior class: the early years of the DSIR’, Minerva, 8 (3), 1970, 396–411.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric, ‘Government laboratories and the influence of organized scientists’, Science Studies, 1, 1971, 331–56.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, Eric, ‘Origins of the University Grants Committee’, Minerva, 1975, 13 (4), 583–620.Google Scholar

Jami, Catherine, ‘Western mathematics in China. Seventeenth century and nineteenth century’ in Petitjean, Jami and Moulin (eds.) Science and empires, 79–88.Google Scholar

Johannisson, Karin, ‘Society in numbers: the debate over quantification in eighteenth century political economy’ in Frängsmyr, Heilbron and Rider (eds.), The quantifying spirit, pp. 343–61.Google Scholar

Johnson, Jeffrey A., ‘Academic chemistry in Imperial Germany’, Isis, 76 (4), 1985, 500–24.Google Scholar

Johnson, Jeffrey A. ‘Technological mobilization and munitions production. Comparative perspectives on Germany and Austria’ in MacLeod, Roy and Johnson, Jeffrey A. (eds.), Frontline and factory, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Josephson, Paul R., Physics and politics in revolutionary Russia, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Josephson, Paul R. ‘The political economy of Soviet science from Lenin to Gorbachev’ in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 145–169.Google Scholar

Josephson, Paul R., Totalitarian science and technology, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1996.Google Scholar

Josephson, Paul R., ‘Science, ideology, and the state physics in the twentieth century’ in Mary Jo Nye (ed.), Cambridge history of science, vol. 5, pp. 579–97.Google Scholar

Kapila, Shruti, ‘The enchantment of science in India’, Isis, 101 (1), 2010, 120–32.Google Scholar

Kapur, Ashok, ‘India: the nuclear scientists and the state, the Nehru and post-Nehru years’, in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 209–29.Google Scholar

Kenney-Wallace, Geraldine A. and Mustard, J. Fraser, ‘From paradox to paradigm: the evolution of science and technology in Canada’, Daedalus, 117 (4), 1988, 191–214.Google Scholar

Kevles, Daniel J., ‘The National Science Foundation and the debate over postwar research policy, 1942–1945: a political interpretation of Science – the endless frontier’, Isis, 68 (1), 1977, 4–26.Google Scholar

Kevles, Daniel J., The physicists. The history of a scientific community in Modern America, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978.Google Scholar

Kiernan, Michael (ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon, IV: The advancement of learning Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

King, James, Science and rationalism in the government of Louis XIV, New York: Octagon Books, 1972 [1949].Google Scholar

Kirby, William C., ‘Technocratic organisation and technological development in China: The Nationalist experience and legacy, 1928–1953’ in Simon, Denis and Goldman, Merle (eds.), Science and technology in Post-Mao China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar

Knight, David, The nature of science: the history of science in western culture since 1600, London: A. Deutsch, 1976.Google Scholar

Kohler, Robert, Partners in science: Foundations and national scientists 1900–1945, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kojevnikov, Alexei, ‘The Great War, the Russian Civil War, and the invention of Big Science’, Science in Context, 15 (2), 2002, pp. 239–75.Google Scholar

Krementsov, Nickolai, Stalinist science, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Krementsov, Nickolai, ‘Russian science in the twentieth century’ in John Krige and Dominique Pestre (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 777–94.Google Scholar

Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar

Krishna, V. V., ‘The colonial “model” and the emergence of national science in India: 1876–1920’, in Petitjean, Jami and Moulin, (eds.), Science and empires, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar

Kumar, Deepak (ed.), Science and empire: Essays in Indian context (1700–1947), Delhi: Anamika Prakashan, 1991.Google Scholar

Kumar, Deepak Science and the Raj, 1857–1905, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kümmel, Werner, ‘De morbis aulicis; on diseases found at court’ in Nutton (ed.), Medicine and the courts, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Lacey, Michael, ‘The world of the bureaus: government and the positivist project in the late nineteenth century’ in Michael, Lacey and Mary, Furner (eds.), The state and social investigation in Britain and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 127–70.Google Scholar

Lafuente, Antonio, ‘Enlightenment in an imperial context; local science in the late- eighteenth-century Hispanic world, Osiris 2nd ser., 15, 2000, 155–73.Google Scholar

Laird, W. R., ‘Patronage of mechanics and theories of impact in sixteenth-century Italy’ in Moran, Patronage and institutions, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Sanford, Knowledge and power: essays on science and government, New York: The Free Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Sanford, ‘The scientific establishment and American pluralism’, in Lakoff, Knowledge and power, pp. 377–394.Google Scholar

Langines, Janis, Conserving the Enlightenment. French military engineering from Vauban to the Revolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Lapp, Ralph E., The new priesthood: The scientific elite and the uses of power, New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar

Largent, Mark A, Breeding contempt: The history of coerced sterilization in the United States, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Lassman, Thomas C., ‘Government science in postwar America: Henry A. Wallace, Edward U. Condon, and the transformation of the National Bureau of Standards, 1945–1951’, Isis, 96 (1), 2005, 25–51.Google Scholar

Leary, John E., Francis Bacon and the politics of science, Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Jörg, Morselli, Francesca, Science and technology in the First World War. CENDARI Archival Research Guide. 2016.Google Scholar

Le Roux, Thomas, ‘Chemistry and industrial and environmental governance in France 1770–1830’, History of Science, 54 (2), 2016, 195–222.Google Scholar

Levere, Trevor H. and Jarrell, Richard A., (eds.), A curious field-book: science & society in Canadian history, Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Lewis, Robert, Science and industrialisation in the USSR, New York, 1979.Google Scholar

Limoges, Camille, ‘The development of the Museum d’histoire naturelle of Paris, c. 1800–1914’ in Fox and Weisz (eds.), The organization of science, pp. 213–40.Google Scholar

Long, T. Dixon, ‘Policy and politics in Japanese science: the persistence of a tradition’, Minerva, 7 (3), 1969, 426–53.Google Scholar

Low, Morris, Nakayama, Shigeru and Yoshioka, Hitoshi, Science, technology and society in contemporary Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lowood, Henry, ‘The calculating forester: quantification, cameral science, and the emergence of scientific forestry management in Germany’ in Frängsmyr, Heilbron and Rider (eds.), The quantifying spirit, pp. 315–42.Google Scholar

Lux, David, ‘The reorganisation of science 1450–1700’ in Moran (ed.), Patronage, pp. 185–94.Google Scholar

Lyton, Edwin, ‘Mirror-image twins: the communities of science and technology’ in Daniels (ed.), Nineteenth-century American science, pp. 210–230.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Lee T., ‘Making Kew Observatory: the Royal Society, the British Association and the politics of early Victorian science’, British Journal of the History of Science, 48 (3), 2015, 409–33.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘The Alkali Acts administration, 1863–4: the emergence of the civil scientist’, Victorian Studies, 9 (2), 1965, 85–112.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Of medals and men: a reward system in Victorian science, 1826–1914’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 26, 1971, 81–105.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘The Royal Society and the Government Grant: notes on the administration of scientific research, 1849–1914’, The Historical Journal, 14 (2), 1971, 323–58.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Resources of science in Victorian England: the Endowment of Science Movement, 1868–1900’ in Mathias, D. (ed.), Science and society 1600–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 111–66.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Scientific advice for British India: imperial perceptions and administrative goals, 1898–1923’, Modern Asian Studies, 9 (3), 1975, 343–84.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Science and the Treasury: principles, personalities and politics, 1870–85’ in Turner, G. L. E. (ed.), The patronage of science in the nineteenth century, Leyden: Noordhoff, 1976, pp. 115–72.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Whigs and savants: reflections on the reform movement in the Royal Society, 1830–1848’ in Ian, Inkster and John, Morrell (eds.), Metropolis and province: science in British culture 1780–1850, London, 1983, pp. 55–90.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Imperial reflections in the Southern Seas: the Funafuti expedition 1896–1904’ in MacLeod, Roy and Rehbock, Philip F. (eds.), Nature in its greatest extent. Western science in the Pacific, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1988, pp. 159–91.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘The “Arsenal” in the strand: Australian chemists and the British munitions effort 1916–1919’, Annals of Science, 46 (1), 1989, 45–67.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘“Combat scientists”: the Office of Scientific Research and Development and Field Service in the Pacific’, War & Society, 11 (2), 1993, 117–34.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘Discovery and exploration’ in Bowler and Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 6, pp. 34–59.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy, ‘The scientists go to war: revisiting precept and practice, 1914–1919’, Journal of War & Culture Studies, 2 (1), 2009, 37–51.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy and Andrews, E. Kay, ‘The origins of the D.S.I.R.: reflections on ideas and men, 1915–1916’, Public Administration, 48 (1), 1970, 23–48.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy and Andrews, E. Kay ‘Scientific advice in the War at Sea, 1915–1917: the Board of Invention and Research’, Journal of Contemporary History, 6 (2), 1971, 3–40.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy and Johnson, Jeffrey A. (eds.), Frontline and factory: Comparative perspectives on the chemical industry at war 1914–1924, Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy and Johnson, Jeffrey A ‘Introduction’ in MacLeod and Johnson (eds.), Frontline and factory, pp. xiii-xix.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Roy and MacLeod, Kay, ‘War and economic development: governments and the optical industry in Britain, 1914–18’ in Winter, J. M. (ed.), War and economic development: Essays in memory of David Joslin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, pp. 165–203.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B., ‘Introduction’ to Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, pp. 9–63.Google Scholar

Macrakis, Kristie, Surviving the swastika: Scientific research in Nazi Germany, New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Maerker, Anna, ‘Political order and the ambivalence of expertise: Count Rumford and welfare reform in late eighteenth-century Munich’, Osiris, 25 (1), 2010, 213–30.Google Scholar

Makarova, Raisa (trans. and ed. by R. A. Pierce and A. S. Donnelly), Russians in the Pacific 1743–1799, Kingston: Limestone Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Manning, Thomas, US Coast Survey vs Naval Hydrographic Office: A nineteenth-century century rivalry in science and politics, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Martin, Julian, Francis Bacon, the state, and the reform of natural philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

McClellan, James, Science reorganised. Scientific societies in the eighteenth century, New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

McClellan, James, ‘Scientific institutions and the organization of science’ in Roy Porter (ed.), Eighteenth- Century science, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar

McClellan, James, Colonialism and science: Saint Domingue in the old regime, Chicago: University of Chicago, 2010.Google Scholar

McClellan, James and Regourd, François, The colonial machine: French science and overseas expansion in the old regime, Ternhout, Belgium: Brepolis, 2011.Google Scholar

McClelland, Charles, State, society, and university in Germany 1700–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

McGrath, Patrick J., Scientists, business, and the state 1890–1960, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.Google Scholar

McGucken, William, ‘Freedom and planning, on freedom and planning in science: the Society for Freedom in Science, 1940–46’, Minerva, 1978, 16 (1), 42–72.Google Scholar

McGucken, William, ‘Royal Society and the Scientific Advisory Committee to Britain’s War Cabinet, 1939–1940’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 33 (1), 1978, 87–115.Google Scholar

McGucken, William, ‘Central organisation of scientific and technical advice in the United Kingdom during the Second World War’, Minerva, 13, 1979, 33–69.Google Scholar

Mehrtens, Herbert, ‘The social system of mathematics and National Socialism: a survey’ in Renneberg and Walker (eds.), Science, technology and National Socialism, pp. 291–311.Google Scholar

Mendelsohn, Everett, Smith, Merritt Roe and Weingart, Peter (eds.), Science, technology and the military, Dordrecht: Springer, 1988.Google Scholar

Meyer-Thurow, Georg, ‘The industrialization of invention: a case study from the German chemical industry’, Isis, 73, 1982, 363–81.Google Scholar

Miller, Howard S., ‘The political economy of science’ in Daniels (ed.), Nineteenth-century American science, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar

Miller, H. Lyman, Science and dissent in post-Mao China: The politics of knowledge, Seattle: University of Washington, 1996.Google Scholar

Moore, Kelly, Disrupting science. Social movements, American scientists, and the politics of the military, 1945–1975, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Moran, Bruce T., Patronage and institutions: science, technology, and medicine at the European court, 1500–1750, Rochester, New York: Boydell Press, 1991, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar

Moran, Bruce T, ‘Patronage and institutions: courts, universities and academies in Germany; an overview’ in Moran, Patronage and institutions, pp. 169–83.Google Scholar

Moran, Bruce T, The alchemical world of the German Court: Occult philosophy and chemical medicine in the circle of Moritz of Hessen, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1991.Google Scholar

Moran, Bruce T, ‘Courts and academies’ in Park and Daston (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 3, pp. 251–71.Google Scholar

Moseley, Russell, ‘The origins and early years of the National Physical Laboratory: a chapter in the pre-history of British science policy’, Minerva, 16, 1978, 222–50.Google Scholar

Mukerji, Chandra, A fragile power: Scientists and the state, Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Nakayama, Shigeru, Science, technology and society in postwar Japan, London: Kegan Paul, 1991.Google Scholar

Navari, Cornelia, ‘The origins of the nation-state’ in Tivey, The nation-state, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar

Naylor, Simon, ‘Log books and the law of storms: maritime meteorology and the British Admiralty in the nineteenth century’, Isis 106 (4), 2015, 771–97.Google Scholar

Nelson, Brian, The making of the modern state: a theoretical evaluation, London: Palgrave, 2006.Google Scholar

Neufeld, Michael J., ‘The guided missile and the Third Reich: Peenemūnde and the forging of a technological revolution’ in Renneberg and Walker (eds.), Science, technology and national socialism, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar

Nutton, Vivian (ed.), Medicine and the courts of Europe, 1500–1837, London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Nye, Mary Jo (ed.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 5, The modern physical and mathematical sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Olby, R. C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R. and Hodge, M. J. S. (eds.), Companion to the history of modern science, London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Ortiz, Eduardo L., ‘Army and science in Argentina: 1850–1950’ in Forman and Sánchez-Ron (eds.), National military establishments, pp. 153–84.Google Scholar

Osborne, Michael A., Nature, the exotic, and the science of French colonialism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Outram, Dorinda, ‘Politics and vocation. French science, 1793–1830, British Journal for the History of Science, 13 (1), 1980, 27–43.Google Scholar

Owens, Larry, ‘Science in the United States’ in Krige and Pestre (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 821–37.Google Scholar

Park, Katharine and Daston, Lorraine (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Pattison, Michael, ‘Scientists, inventors and the military in Britain, 1915–19: The Munitions Inventions Department’, Social Studies of Science, 13 (4), 1983, 521–68.Google Scholar

Paul, Harry, From knowledge to power: the rise of the science empire in France, 1860–1939, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Penrick, James L., Pursell, Carroll W., Sherwood, Margaret and Swain, Donald (eds.), The politics of American science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Petitjean, Patrick, ‘Science and the “Civilizing Mission”: France and the colonial enterprise’ in Stutchtey, Benedikt (ed.), Science across the European Empires – 1800–1950, Oxford University Press, 2005. pp. 107–28,Google Scholar

Petitjean, Patrick, Jami, Catherine and Moulin, A. M. (eds.), Science and empires: Historical studies about scientific development and European expansion, Dordrecht: Springer, 1992.Google Scholar

Pfetsch, Frank, ‘Scientific organisation and science policy in Imperial Germany, 1871–1914: the foundation of the Imperial Institute of Physics and Technology’, Minerva, 8 (4), 1970, 557–80.Google Scholar

Pfetsch, Frank, ‘Germany: three models of interaction – Weimar, Nazi, Federal Republic’ in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 189–208.Google Scholar

Pielke, Roger, ‘In retrospect: Science – the endless frontier’, Nature, 466, 2010, 922–23.Google Scholar

Pierre, Andrew J., Nuclear politics, the British experience with an independent nuclear force, London: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Pimentel, Juan, ‘The Iberian vision: science and empire in the framework of a universal monarchy, 1500–1800’, Osiris, 15, 17–30.Google Scholar

Poggi, Gianfranco, ‘The modern state and the idea of progress’ in Almond, Gabriel, Chodorow, Martin and Pearce, Roy Harvey (eds.), Progress and its discontents, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982, pp. 337–60.Google Scholar

Poletschek, Silvia, ‘The invention of Humboldt and the impact of National Socialism: the German university idea in the first half of the twentieth century’ in Szöllösi-Janze, Margit (ed.), Science in the Third Reich, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 27–58.Google Scholar

Pollock, Ethan, Stalin and the Soviet science wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Porter, Dorothy, Health, civilization, and the state: a history of public health from ancient to modern times, London: Routledge 1999.Google Scholar

Porter, Roy, ‘The scientific revolution: a spoke in the wheel?’ in Porter, Roy and Teich, Mikuláš (eds.), Revolutions in history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, pp. 290–316.Google Scholar

Porter, Roy, (ed.), Cambridge history of science, vol. 4. Eighteenth-century science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Porter, Roy and Teich, Mikuláš (eds.), The scientific revolution in national context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore M., The rise of statistical thinking 1820–1900, Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore M. Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Prakash, Gyan, Another reason. Science and the imagination of modern India, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Price, Don K., ‘The scientific establishment’ in Gilpin, Robert and Wright, Christopher (eds.), Scientists and national policy-making, Columbia University Press, New York, 1964. pp. 19–40.Google Scholar

Price, Don K., The scientific estate, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Pursell, Carroll W. Jr., ‘The anatomy of a failure: the Science Advisory Board, 1933–1935’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 109 (6), 1965, 342–51.Google Scholar

Pursell, Carroll W. Jr., ‘A preface to government support of research and development: research legislation and the National Bureau of Standards, 1935–41’, Technology and Culture, 9 (2), 1968, pp. 145–64.Google Scholar

Pursell, Carroll W. Jr. ‘Science agencies in World War II: the OSRD and its challengers’ in Nathan Reingold (ed.), The sciences in the American context, pp. 359–78.Google Scholar

Pyatt, Edward, The National Physical Laboratory. A history, Bristol: Adam Hilger, 1983.Google Scholar

Pyenson, Lewis, ‘On the military and the exact sciences in France’ in Forman and Sánchez-Ron (eds.), National military establishments, pp. 135–52.Google Scholar

Pyenson, Lewis and Sheets-Pyenson, Susan, Servants of nature: a history of scientific institutions, enterprises, and sensibilities, London: Fontana, 1999.Google Scholar

Rabb, Theodore K., The struggle for stability in early modern Europe, New York: Oxford University Press 1975.Google Scholar

Raj, Kapil, ‘Knowledge, power and modern science: the Brahmins strike back’ in Kumar (ed.) Science and empire, pp. 115–25.Google Scholar

Rappaport, Rhoda, ‘The liberties of the Paris Academy of Sciences, 1716–1785’ in Woolf, Harry (ed.), The Analytic spirit. Essays in the history of science in honor of Henry Guerlac, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981, pp. 225–56.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Anne, ‘Science and technology’ in Horne, John (ed.), A companion to World War I, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 307–22.Google Scholar

Rees, Graham (ed.), The Oxford Francis Bacon. The instauratio magna. Part II: Novum organum and associated texts, Oxford: Clarendon, 2000.Google Scholar

Reich, Leonard S., The making of American industrial research: Science and business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Reidy, Michael S., Tides of history: Ocean science and Her Majesty’s navy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Reidy, Michael S., Kroll, Gary and Conway, Erik M., Exploration and science: social impact and interaction, Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2007.Google Scholar

Reingold, Nathan (ed.), The sciences in the American context: new perspectives,Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Renneberg, Monika and Walker, Mark (eds.), Science, technology and national socialism,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Resnik, David, Playing politics with science: Balancing scientific independence and government oversight, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Richards, Pamela, ‘Great Britain and Allied scientific information, 1939–45’, Minerva, 26 (2), 1988, 177–98.Google Scholar

Roberts, Lissa, ‘Le centre de toutes choses: Constructing and managing centralization on the Isle de France’, History of Science, 52 (3), 2014, 319–42.Google Scholar

Roland, Alex, ‘Science and war’, Osiris, 1, 1985, 247–72.Google Scholar

Roland, Alex, ‘Science, technology and war’ in Nye (ed.), Cambridge history of science, vol. 5, pp. 559–78.Google Scholar

Ronayne, Jarleth, Science in government, London: Edward Arnold, 1984.Google Scholar

Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven, Science and society, London: Allen Lane, 1969.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Charles E., ‘Science, technology, and economic growth: the case of the agricultural experiment station scientists, 1875–1914’ in George Daniels (ed.), Nineteenth-century American science, pp. 181–209.Google Scholar

Rusnock, Andrea, ‘Quantification, precision, and accuracy: determinations of population in the ancient regime’ in Wise, M. Norton (ed.), The values of precision, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar

Rusnock, Andrea ‘Biopolitics: political arithmetic in the Enlightenment’ in Clark, William, Golinsi, Jan and Schaffer, Simon (eds.), The sciences in enlightened Europe, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999, pp. 50–68.Google Scholar

Russell, Colin, Science and social change in Britain and Europe, 1700–1900, London: Macmillan, 1984.Google Scholar

Saich, Tony, ‘Reform of China’s science and technology organisational system’ in Simon and Goldman (eds.), Science and technology, pp. 69–88.Google Scholar

Salomon, Jean-Jacques, Science and politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Sapolsky, Harvey M., Science and the navy: The history of the Office of Naval Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Sargent, Rose-Mary, ‘Bacon as an advocate for cooperative scientific research’ in Peltonen, Markku (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Bacon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 147–71.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Simon, ‘What is science?’ in Krige and Pestre (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar

Schedvin, Carl B., Shaping science and industry: a history of Australia’s Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, 1926–49, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar

Schiavon, Martina, ‘The Bureau des longitudes: an institutional study’ in Higgitt, Rebekah, Dunn, Richard and Jones, Peter (eds.), Navigational enterprises in Europe and its empires, 1730–1850, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 65–85.Google Scholar

Schiebinger, Londa, ‘Women of natural knowledge’ in Park and Daston (eds.), Cambridge history of science, vol. 3, pp. 192–205.Google Scholar

Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia, ‘Introduction’ in Schiebinger, Londa and Swan, Claudia (eds.), Colonial botany. Science, commerce and politics in the early modern world, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Schneider, L. A., ‘Learning from Russia: Lysenkoism and the fate of genetics in China, 1950–1986’ in D. Simon and M. Goldman (eds.), Science and technology, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar

Schoeder-Gudehus, Brigitte, ‘The argument for the self-government and public support of science in Weimar Germany, Minerva, 10 (4), 1972, 537–70.Google Scholar

Schoeder-Gudehus, Brigitte, ‘Nationalism and internationalism’ in Olby, Cantor, Christie and Hodge (eds.), Companion, pp. 909–19.Google Scholar

Schwartzman, Simon, ‘Brazil: scientists and the state—evolving models and the ‘great leap forward’ in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 171–88.Google Scholar

Schweber, S., ‘The mutual embrace of science and the military: ONR and the growth of physics in the United States after World War II’ in E. Mendelsohn, Merritt Roe Smith and Peter Weingart (eds.), Science, technology and the military, II, pp. 3–45.Google Scholar

Scott, James, Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Scott-Carver, J., ‘A reconsideration of eighteenth-century Russia’s contributions to European science’ in Osler, Malcolm (ed.), Science in Europe, 1500–1800: a secondary sources reader, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002, pp. 226–33.Google Scholar

Seidel, Robert, ‘The origins of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory’ in Galison, Peter and Hevly, Bruce (ed.), Big science: The growth of large-scale research, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992, pp. 21–45.Google Scholar

Shapin, Stephen, The scientific revolution, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon, Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Shakelford, Jole, ‘Paracelsianism and patronage in early modern Denmark’ in Moran (ed.), Patronage and institutions, pp. 85–109.Google Scholar

Shils, Edward, ‘The order of learning in the United States from 1865 to 1920: the ascendancy of the universities’, Minerva, 16 (2), 1978, pp. 159–95.Google Scholar

Shinn, Terry, ‘The industry, research, and education nexus’ in Nye (ed.), Cambridge history of science, vol. 5, 133–53.Google Scholar

Siegelbaum, Lewis H. The politics of industrial mobilization in Russia, 1914–17: a study of the war-industries committees, Houndmills: Palgrave, 1983.Google Scholar

Simon, D. and Goldman, M. (eds.), Science and technology in post-Mao China, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Simon, D. and Goldman, M. ‘The onset’ in Simon and Goldman (eds.), Science and Technology, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Bruce, ‘The promise of the future: technical education’ in Daniels, George (ed.), Nineteenth-century American science: A reappraisal, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972, pp. 249–72.Google Scholar

Sinha, Jagdish N., Science, war and imperialism. India in the Second World War, Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Sivasundaram, Sujit, ‘Sciences and the global: On methods, questions, and theory’, Isis, 101 (1), 2010, 146–58.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin, ‘The state’ in Ball, T., Farr, T. and Hanson, R. (eds.), Political innovation and conceptual change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 90–131.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce L. R., American science policy since World War II, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1990.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce L. R. ‘The United States: the formation and breakdown of the postwar government-science compact’ in Solingen (ed.), Scientists and the state, pp. 33–61.Google Scholar

Smith, John Denly, ‘ World War II and the transformation of the American chemical industry’ in E. Mendelsohn, Merritt Roe Smith and Peter Weingart (eds.), Science, technology and the military, pp. 307–322.Google Scholar

Solingen, Etel (ed.), Scientists and the state: domestic structures and the international context, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Soll, Jacob, The information master: Jean-Baptiste Colbert’s secret state intelligence system, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Solomon, Julie Robin, Objectivity in the making: Francis Bacon and the politics of inquiry, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Solomon, Susan and Krementsov, Nickolai, ‘Giving and taking across borders: the Rockefeller Foundation and Russia, 1919–28’, Minerva, 39 (3), 2001, 265–98.Google Scholar

Spedding, James, The letters and the life of Francis Bacon, London: Longman, Green, Longman & Roberts, 1861.Google Scholar

Stapleton, Darwin H., ‘Ėlève des Poudres: E.I. du Pont’s multiple transfers of French technology’ in Buchanan, Brenda (ed.), Gunpowder, explosives and the state: a technological history, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006, pp. 230–38.Google Scholar

Steen, Kathryn, ‘Technical expertise and US mobilization 1917–18: high explosives and war gases’ in MacLeod and Johnson (eds.), Frontline and factory, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar

Stewart, Irvin, Organizing research for war, Boston: Little Brown and Coy, 1948.Google Scholar

Storey, William E., ‘Plants, power and development: founding the Imperial Department of Agriculture for the West Indies, 1880–1914’ in Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.), States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order, New York: Routledge, 2004, pp. 109–30.Google Scholar

Storey, William Kelleher, Science and power in colonial Mauritius, Rochester: Rochester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Stoup, Alice, A company of scientists: Botany, patronage, and community at the seventeenth-century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Stoup, Alice ‘The political theory and practice of technology under Louis XIV’ in Moran (ed.), Patronage, pp. 211–13.Google Scholar

Stranges, Anthony N., ‘The US Bureau of Mines: synthetic fuel programme, 1920–1950s: German connections and American advances’, Annals of Science, 54 (1), 1997, 29–68.Google Scholar

Sörlin, Sverker, ‘Ordering the world for Europe: science as intelligence and information as seen from the northern periphery source’, Osiris, 15, 2000, 51–69.Google Scholar

Szöllösi-Janze, Margit, ‘Science and social space: transformations in the institutions of Wissenschaft from the Wilhelmite empire to the Weimar republic’, Minerva, 43, 2005, 339–60.Google Scholar

Taton, René, ‘Jean-Dominique Cassini’ in Gillispie, Charles (ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography, New York: Scribner 1970, vol. 3, pp. 100–6.Google Scholar

Terrall, Mary, ’The culture of science in Frederick the Great’s Berlin’, History of Science, 28 (4), 1990, 333–64.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles (ed.), The formation of national states in Western Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles ‘Reflections on the history of European state-making’ in Charles Tilly (ed.), The formation of national states, pp. 1–83.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles ‘Western state-making and theories of political transformation’ in Charles Tilly (ed.), The formation of national states, pp. 601–38.Google Scholar

Tinkler, Hugh, ‘The national state in Asia’ in Tivey (ed.), The nation-state, pp. 104–21.Google Scholar

Tivey, Leonard, ‘Introduction’ in Tivey (ed.), The nation-state, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Tivey, Leonard, (ed.), The nation-state: The formation of modern politics, Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar

Tuchman, Arleen, Science, medicine and the state in Germany: the case of Baden 1815–1871, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Turner, Frank, ‘Public science in Britain 1880–1919’, Isis, 71 (4), 1980, 589–608.Google Scholar

Underwood, Matthew, ‘Ordering knowledge, re-ordering empire: science and state formation in the English Atlantic world, 1650–1688’, PhD dissertation, Harvard, 2010.Google Scholar

Varcoe, Ian, Organising for science in Britain: a case study, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Varcoe, Ian, ‘Scientists, government and organised research: the early history of the DSIR 1914–16’, Minerva, 8, 1976, 192–217.Google Scholar

Varcoe, Ian, ‘Co-operative Research Associations in British Industry, 1918–34’, Minerva, 19 (3), 1981, 433–63.Google Scholar

Vessuri, Hebe, ‘Science in Latin America’ in John Krige and Dominique Pestre (ed.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 839–87.Google Scholar

Vincent, Andrew, Theories of the state, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Vogel, Klaus A. and Rankin, Alisha, ‘European expansion and self-definition’ in Park, and Daston, (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 3, pp. 818–90.Google Scholar

Von Gizycki, Rainald, ‘Centre and periphery in the international scientific community: Germany, France and Great Britain in the nineteenth century’, Minerva, 11 (4), 1973, 474–94.Google Scholar

von Oertzed, Christine, ‘Machineries of data power: manual versus mechanical census compilation in nineteenth century Europe’, Osiris, 32, 2017, 129–15.Google Scholar

Vucinich, Alexander, Science in Russian culture 1861–1917, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Vucinich, Alexander, Empire of knowledge: The Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1917–1970), Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Wakefield, André, The disordered police state: German cameralism as science and practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2009.Google Scholar

Walker, Mark, German national socialism and the quest for nuclear power 1939–1949, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Walker, Mark, Nazi science: Myth, truth, and the German atom bomb, New York: Plenum Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Walker, Mark, ‘Twentieth century German science. Institutional innovation and adaptation’ in Krige and Pestre (eds.), Science in the twentieth century, pp. 795–819.Google Scholar

Walker, Mark, ‘Introduction’ to special issue on ‘Science in the Nazi regime: The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under Hitler’, Minerva, 2006, 44, 241–50.Google Scholar

Wang, Jessica, ‘Scientists and the problem of the public in Cold War America, 1945–1960’, Osiris, 17, 2002, pp. 323–47.Google Scholar

Wang, Jessica, American science in an age of anxiety. Scientists, anticommunism, and the Cold War, Chapel Hill: University of New Carolina Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Watson, Mark F. and Noltie, Henry J., ‘Career, collections, reports and publications of Dr. Francis Buchanan (later Hamilton), 1762–1829: natural history studies in Nepal, Burma (Myanmar), Bangladesh and India’. Part 1, Annals of Science, 73 (4), 2016, 392–424.Google Scholar

Weale, Adrian, Science and the swastika, London: Macmillan, 2001.Google Scholar

Webster, Charles, The great instauration: science, medicine and reform, 1626–1660, London: Duckworth, 1975.Google Scholar

Weindling, Paul, ‘Medicine and modernisation: the social history of German health and medicine’, History of Science, 24, 1986, pp. 277–301.Google Scholar

Weindling, Paul, ‘The Rockefeller Foundation and German biomedical sciences, 1920–40: from educational philanthropy to international science policy’ in Rupke, Nicolaas A. (ed.), Science, politics and the public good, Houndmills: Palgrave, 1988, pp. 119–40.Google Scholar

Weindling, Paul, Health, race and German politics between German Unification and Nazism 1870–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Werrett, Simon, ‘The Schumacher affair: reconfiguring academic expertise across dynasties in eighteenth-century Russia’, Osiris, 25 (1), 2010, 104–26.Google Scholar

Westfall, Richard S., ‘Science and patronage: Galileo and the telescope’, Isis, 76 (1), 1985, 11–30.Google Scholar

Westfall, Richard S. ‘Patronage and the publication of Galileo’s Dialogue’, History and technology, 4, 1987, 385–99.Google Scholar

Westman, Robert, ‘The astronomer’s role in the sixteenth century’, History of science, 18, 1980, 105–47.Google Scholar

Westsick, Peter J., The National Labs: Science in an American system, 1947–1974, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Whitney, Charles C., ‘Merchants of light: science as colonization in the New Atlantis’ in Sessions, William E. (ed.), Francis Bacon’s legacy of texts, New York: AMS Press, 1990, pp. 255–68.Google Scholar

Widmalm, Sven, ‘Instituting science in Sweden’ in Porter and Teich, The scientific revolution, pp. 240–62.Google Scholar

Widmalm, Sven, ‘Accuracy, rhetoric, and technology: the Paris-Greenwich triangulation, 1784–88’ in Frängsmyr, Heilbron and Rider (eds.), The quantifying spirit, pp. 179–206.Google Scholar

Wilkie, Tom, British science and politics since 1945, Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Williams, L. Pearce, ‘Science, education and Napoleon I’, Isis, 47 (4), 1956, 369–82.Google Scholar

Willmoth, Frances, Sir Jonas Moore: Practical mathematics and Restoration science, Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Winch, Donald, ‘The science of the legislator: the Enlightenment heritage’ in Lacey, Michael and Furner, Mary (eds.), The state and social investigation in Britain and the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 63–91.Google Scholar

Windsor, Mary, ‘Museums’ in Bowler and Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 6, pp. 60–75.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Audra J., Competing with the Soviets: science, technology, and the state in Cold War America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Worboys, Michael, ‘Science and the colonial empire, 1895–1940’ in Kumar (ed.), Science and empire, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar

Worboys, Michael, ‘Public and environmental health’ in Bowler and Pickstone (eds.), The Cambridge history of science, vol. 6, pp. 141–64.Google Scholar

Wraight, A. Joseph and Roberts, Elliott B., The Coast and Geodetic Survey 1807–1957, Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, 1957.Google Scholar

Yeo, Eileen Janes, ‘Social surveys in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries’ in Porter, Theodore M., Ross, Dorothy (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science: vol. 7, The modern social sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar

Zachary, G. Pascal, Endless frontier, Vannevar Bush: Engineer of the American century, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1999.Google Scholar

Zeldin, Theodore, ‘Higher education in France, 1848–1940’, Journal of contemporary history, 2 (3), 1967, 53–80.Google Scholar

Zwerling, Craig, ‘The emergence of the École normale superieure as a centre of scientific education in nineteenth century’ in Fox and Weisz (eds.), The organization of science, pp. 31–60.Google Scholar