Book contents
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
- 2 Recent Scientific Developments in Genetic Technologies: Implications for Future Regulation of GMOs in Developing Countries
- 3 A Strategy for Integrating Science into Regulatory Decision-Making for GMOs
- 4 Governance of Benefits and Risks of GMOs in Developing Countries
- 5 The Canadian Experience with the Creation and Implementation of Regulatory Frameworks for the Environmental Release of GM Crops as a Model for Developing Countries
- 6 Labelling of Food from GMOs: Options to Consider by Developing Countries
- 7 Building Human Capacity and Skills in Biosafety: Lessons Learned and Emerging Best Practices
- Part II Diversification of Expertise
- Part III Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
- Part IV Case Studies from Developing Countries
- Index
- References
5 - The Canadian Experience with the Creation and Implementation of Regulatory Frameworks for the Environmental Release of GM Crops as a Model for Developing Countries
from Part I - Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
Book contents
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
- 2 Recent Scientific Developments in Genetic Technologies: Implications for Future Regulation of GMOs in Developing Countries
- 3 A Strategy for Integrating Science into Regulatory Decision-Making for GMOs
- 4 Governance of Benefits and Risks of GMOs in Developing Countries
- 5 The Canadian Experience with the Creation and Implementation of Regulatory Frameworks for the Environmental Release of GM Crops as a Model for Developing Countries
- 6 Labelling of Food from GMOs: Options to Consider by Developing Countries
- 7 Building Human Capacity and Skills in Biosafety: Lessons Learned and Emerging Best Practices
- Part II Diversification of Expertise
- Part III Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
- Part IV Case Studies from Developing Countries
- Index
- References
Summary
The application of biotech in the field of plant agriculture over the last two decades has provided crop developers with extraordinary opportunities to introduce novel traits into plants and build on generations of plant breeding. Countries have sought to ensure that they can benefit from the possibilities of the application of modern biotechnology while managing any potential risks. While the implementation, legal frameworks and regulations that inform the construction of a regulatory approach may differ between countries, the information that informs the risk assessments that underlie the safe deployment of transgenic crops shares common elements. With this in mind, countries looking to develop regulatory frameworks can take advantage of extensive opportunities for regulatory streamlining and shared or harmonized approval processes that allow the most effective use of limited skilled resources while maintaining a high standard for environmental safety. Focussing on the Canadian experience as an example, the application of risk assessment as a component of a regulatory framework will be discussed and common elements identified to give an example of a robust regulatory approach.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance, pp. 53 - 63Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
CFIA (2016). Canadian Food Inspection Agency Biology Documents. [Online]. Available from www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/dir/biodoce.shtmlGoogle Scholar
García-Alonso, M. et al. (2014). Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants: a conceptual framework. Transgenic Research 23, 1025–1041.Google Scholar
Layton, R. et al. (2015). Building better environmental risk assessments. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3, 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, K. L. et al. (2006). Effects of completion on the fitness of wild and crop-wild hybrid sunflower from a diversity of wild populations and crop lines. Evolution 60(10), 2044–2055.Google Scholar
NAS (1987). Introduction of Recombinant DNA Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Saurabh, S. et al. (2014). RNA interference: concept to reality in crop improvement. Planta 239(3), 543–564.Google Scholar
Schnell, J. et al. (2015). A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: considerations for pre-market assessments. Transgenic Research 24, 1–17.Google Scholar
Smyth, S. J. et al. (2011). Environmental impacts from herbicide tolerant canola production in Western Canada. Agricultural Systems 104(5), 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists (2013). ‘Superweeds’ resulting from Monsanto's products overrun U.S. farm landscape. [Online]. Available from www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/superweeds-overrun-farmlands-0384.html#.WG0fmX1BkbUGoogle Scholar
Wozniak, C. and McHughen, A. (2012). Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar