Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T22:38:41.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Land Rich and Cash Poor? The Reluctance of the WTO Dispute Settlement System to Entertain Economics Expertise: An Institutional Analysis

from Part II - The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2017

Theresa Carpenter
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Marion Jansen
Affiliation:
International Trade Centre, Geneva
Joost Pauwelyn
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elsig, Manfred and Pollack, Mark A.. 2014. ‘Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:391415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flett, J. 2015. ‘The Client’s Perspective’, in The Use of Economics in Trade Disputes: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead, Jansen, M., Pauwelyn, J. and Carpenter, T. (eds), Berlin: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friederiszick, H. and Röller, Lars-Hendrik. 2010. Quantification of Harm in Damages Actions for Antitrust Infringements – Insights from German Cartel Cases, mimeo, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1588126.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2013. ‘Domestic Instruments’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law, ALI, The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Law, New York City: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205345.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2007. ‘Recurring Misunderstandings of Non-Recurring Subsidies’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–90.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, P.C.. 2007US – Lamb’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85127.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H. H.. 2003. ‘European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case-Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reports’ Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1440.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marion and Iacovides, Marios. 2015. ‘Economic versus Legal Thinking in International Economic Law: Communication and Interpretation Challenges Related to Economic Evidence’, in Jansen, M., Pauwelyn, J. and Carpenter, T. (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johannesson, Louise, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2014. Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges. Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, A. 2004. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: What Role for Economic Analysis?’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4(4): 365371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neven, Damien, and Trachtman, Joel P.. 2013. ‘Philippines-Taxes on Distilled Spirits: Like Products and Market Definition’, World Trade Review, 12: 297326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordström, Håkan. 2005. ‘The WTO Secretariat in a Changing World’, Journal of World Trade, 39: 819853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisi, F. 2002. ‘Rent-seeking through Litigation: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems Compared’, International Review of Law and Economics 22(2), 193216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2013. ‘The Use, Non-use and Abuse of Economics in WTO and Investment Litigation’, in WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, Huerta-Goldman, Jorge A., Romanetti, Antoine and Stirnimann, Franz X. (eds), Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, chapter 6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×