Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:38:22.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Endometrial Receptivity

from Section 3 - Difficulties and Complications of Ovarian Stimulation and Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2022

Mohamed Aboulghar
Affiliation:
University of Cairo IVF Centre
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access

Summary

Human reproduction is highly inefficient, and that is why it has been widely observed and documented since the ancient civilizations. Fertility has been a main concern along the history. Greeks already described “the best time for fruitful intercourse” [1] understanding that women are not fertile all days of the menstrual cycle. The poor effectiveness of the human species continuity is due to a fair number of factors involved to achieve a successful pregnancy: quality and quantity of sperm, ovum and embryo quality, chromosomal abnormalities, and the capability of the endometrium to harbor the embryo among others. The synchrony between the embryo development and the endometrium maturation must work as perfectly as the gear of a watch.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ovarian Stimulation , pp. 173 - 181
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Temkin, O. Soranus’ Gynaecology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 1956:xlix, 258 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, AT, Rock, J, Adams, EC. A description of 34 human ova within the first 17 days of development. Dev Dyn 1956;98:435493.Google Scholar
Navot, D, Scott, RT, Droesch, K, et al. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril 1991;55(1):114118. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54069-2.Google Scholar
Harper, MJ. The implantation window. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1992;6(2):351371.Google Scholar
Wilcox, AJ, Baird, DD, Weinberg, CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999;340(23):17961799. doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402304.Google Scholar
Grasso, A, Balaguer, N, Vilella, F. Receptividad endometrial: expresión génica y otros biomarcadores. In:García-Velasco, JA, ed. Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva, Vol. 23, No. 3. Edita Anarr. Nuevo Siglo,S.L.; 2017:4557.Google Scholar
Miravet-Valenciano, JA, Balaguer, N, Vilella, F, Simon, C. Molecular diagnosis of endometrial receptivity. In: Simón, C, Giudice, L, eds. The Endometrial Factor, A Reproductive Precision Medicine Approach. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2017:3649.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Alonso, M, Blesa, D, Díaz-Gimeno, P, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2013;100(3):818–24.Google Scholar
Domínguez, F, Loro, F, Simón, C. Funcionalidad del endometrio. In: El Endometrio Humano: Desde la investigación a la clínica. Madrid: Editorial Panamericana; 2009:1937.Google Scholar
Gómez, E, Marín, C, Ruiz-Alonso, M, Miravet-Valenciano, JA, Simón, C. Papel del test ERA en el fallo repetido de la implantación. In: Nadal, J, ed. Banco de óvulos. Madrid: Editorial Panamericana; 2017:6777.Google Scholar
Rarani, FZ, Borhani, F, Rashidi, B. Endometrial pinopode biomarkers: molecules and microRNAs. Cell Physiol 2018;233(12):91459158.Google Scholar
Lessey, BA, Castlebaum, AJ, Sawin, SW, et al. Abberant integrin expression in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;79:643649.Google Scholar
Lessey, BA, Castelbaum, AJ, Sawin, SW, Sun, JJF. Integrins as markers of uterine receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1995;63(3):535542.Google Scholar
Kliman, H, Honig, S, Walls, D, et al. Optimization of endometrial preparation results in a normal endometrial function test (EFT) and good reproductive outcome in donor ovum recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006;23(7–8):299303.Google Scholar
Miravet-Valenciano, J, Ruiz-Alonso, M, Simón, C. Modern evaluation of endometrial receptivity. In: Stadtmauer, A, Tur-Kaspa, I, eds. Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine: Advances in Infertility Work-up, Treatment and ART, 2nd ed. Cham: Springer; 2019:357368.Google Scholar
Domınguez, F, Garrido-Gómez, T, Lopez, JA, et al. Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin 1 and annexin A2 as differentially regulated. Hum Reprod 2009;24:26072617.Google Scholar
Vilella, F, Ramirez, L, Berlanga, O, et al. PGE2 and PGF2 concentrations in human endometrial fluid as biomarkers for embryonic implantation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98(10):41234132.Google Scholar
Díaz-Gimeno, P, Horcajadas, JA, Martínez-Conejero, JA, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril 2011;95(1):50–60, 60.e1–60.e15.Google Scholar
Blesa, D, Ruiz-Alonso, M, Simón, C. Clinical management of endometrial receptivity. Semin Reprod Med 2014;32(5):410413.Google Scholar
Garrido-Gómez, T, Ruiz-Alonso, M, Blesa, D, et al. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results. Fertil Steril 2010;99(4):10781085.Google Scholar
Díaz-Gimeno, P, Ruíz-Alonso, M, Blesa, D, et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2013;99:508517.Google Scholar
Comstock, IA, Diaz-Gimeno, P, Cabanillas, S, et al. Does an increased body mass index affect endometrial gene expression patterns in infertile patients? A functional genomic analysis. Fertil Steril 2017;107(3):740748.Google Scholar
Miravet-Valenciano, J, Ruiz-Alonso, M, Simón, C. The transcriptomics of the human endometrium and embryo implantation. In: Leung, PCK, Qiao, J, eds. Human Reproductive and Prenatal Genetics. London: Academic Press; 2018:271291.Google Scholar
Garcia-Velasco, JA, Fassbender, A, Ruiz-Alonso, M, et al. Is endometrial receptivity transcriptomics affected in women with endometriosis? A pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;31(5):647654.Google Scholar
Franasiak, JM, Werner, MD, Juneau, CR, et al. Endometrial microbiome at the time of embryo transfer: next-generation sequencing of the 16S ribosomal subunit. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:129136.Google Scholar
Moreno, I, Codoñer, FM, Vilella, F, et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215(6):684703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×