Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T13:44:34.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The Structure and Semantics of Complex Sentences

from Part Three - Topics in RRG: Complex Sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

Delia Bentley
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Ricardo Mairal Usón
Affiliation:
Universidad National de Educación a Distancia, Madrid
Wataru Nakamura
Affiliation:
Tohoku University, Japan
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Get access

Summary

This chapter offers an in-depth treatment of clause linkage and complex sentences in RRG. First, it discusses and exemplifies each nexus–juncture type, adducing evidence from a wide range of languages. Then, it introduces the notion of syntactic and semantic cohesiveness in clause linkage and makes relevant generalizations and predictions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiba, Katsue. 1977. Switch-reference in Old Japanese. In Whistler, Kenneth, Robert, D. Van Valin, Jr., Chiarello, Chris, Jaeger, Jeri J., Petruck, Miriam, Thompson, Henry, Javkin, Ronya and Woodbury, Anthony (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 610619. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Akiba, Katsue. 1978. A Historical Study of Old Japanese Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bauer, Winifred. 1993. Maori. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1993. Belhare subordination and the theory of topic. In Ebert, Karen H. (ed.), Studies in Clause Linkage. Papers from the First Köln-Zürich Workshop, 2355. Zurich: Seminar für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: a multivariate analysis. In Bril (ed.), 51–101.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle (ed.). 2010. Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy: Syntax and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2005. Parentheticals. In Brown, Keith (ed. in chief), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9 (2nd ed.), 179182. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dedrick, John M. and Casad, Eugene H.. 1999. Sonora Yaqui Language Structures. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Diller, A. V. N. 2006. Thai serial verbs: Cohesion and culture. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 160177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 1999. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Patrick, Marlett, Stephen A. and Perlmutter., David M. 1991. Notion of subjecthood and switch reference: evidence from Seri. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 431456.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul and O’Connor., Mary Catherine 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel L. 1985. The syntax of switch-reference. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 3555.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 2010. Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Bril (ed.), 27–50.Google Scholar
Foley, William and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4: 333377.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1985. Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Haiman, John (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 187219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John and Thompson., Sandra A. 1984. ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. In Brugman, Claudia and Macaulay, Monica (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 510523 Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996. A Study of Japanese Clause Linkage: The Connective TE in Japanese. Stanford: CSLI Publications/Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees and Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional-Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd and Kuteva., Tania 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35: 848893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, 181225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuley, T. E. 2002. Switch-reference and semantic discontinuity in Late Old Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 18: 2958.Google Scholar
Mous, Marten. 1993. A Grammar of Iraqw. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina and Tolskaya., Maria 2001. A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1992. Diachrony in Clause Linkage and Related Issues. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1994. Diachrony of clause linkage: TE and BA in Old through Middle Japanese. In Paliugca, William (ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization, 135149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 2001. Some thoughts on a new systematization of interclausal semantic relations. Paper presented at the Role and Reference Grammar Workshop, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 2002. Kootai-shiji koo-bun no tsuujisoo: toogo-henka to kategorii-ka (Diachrony of switch-reference constructions: syntactic change and categorization). In Ohori, Toshio (ed.), Ninchi Gengogaku II: Kategorii-ka (Cognitive Linguistics II: Categorization), 297321. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 2005. Construction Grammar as a conceptual framework for linguistic typology: A case from reference tracking. In Fried, Mirjam and Boas, Hans C. (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots, 215237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Olson, Michael L. 1981. Barai Clause Junctures: Toward a Functional Theory of Interclausal Relations. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Pavey, Emma L. 2010. The Structure of Language: An Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1988. Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 4564.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1972. Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die’ in Japanese. In Kimball, John P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 1, 125137. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1993. Of nominatives and datives: Universal Grammar from the bottom up. In Van Valin (ed.), 465–498 (orig. unpublished ms. 1981).Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (ed.). 1993. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2021. Cosubordination. In Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (ed.), Challenges at the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vásquez Soto, Verónica. 2002. Some constraints on Cora causative constructions. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, 197244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Watters, James K. 1993. An investigation of Turkish clause linkage. In Van Valin (ed.), 535–560.Google Scholar
Weber, David John. 1983. Relativization and Nominalized Clauses in Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, David John. 1989. A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×