Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Personal Relationships
- Part I Foundations for Studying Relationships
- Part II Developmental Arc of Relationships
- Part III Relationships across the Life Span
- Part IV Individual Differences
- Part V Basic Processes
- Part VI Interactive Processes
- Part VII Threats to Relationships
- Part VIII Relational Quality
- Part IX Context
- Part X Maintenance and Repair of Relationships
- Part XI Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part IX - Context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Personal Relationships
- Part I Foundations for Studying Relationships
- Part II Developmental Arc of Relationships
- Part III Relationships across the Life Span
- Part IV Individual Differences
- Part V Basic Processes
- Part VI Interactive Processes
- Part VII Threats to Relationships
- Part VIII Relational Quality
- Part IX Context
- Part X Maintenance and Repair of Relationships
- Part XI Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 465 - 508Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Aartsen, M., Van Tilburg, T., Smits, C. H. M., & Knipscheer, K. C. R. M. (2004). A longitudinal study of the impact of physical and cognitive decline on the personal network in old age. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Cooperative courtships: Helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 35, 1285–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballantine, P. W., Lin, Y., & Veer, E. (2015). The influence of user comments on perceptions of Facebook relationship status updates. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? How popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. F., Roberts, S. G. B., & Sutcliffe, A. G. (2012). Closeness, loneliness, support: Core ties and significant ties in personal communities. Social Networks, 34, 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boda, Z., & Neray, B. (2015) Inter-ethnic friendship and negative ties in secondary school. Social Networks, 43, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, L., Fitzpatrick, J., Crawford, D., & Fischer, J. (2001). The role of network support and interference in women’s perception of romantic, friends, and parental relationships. Sex Roles, 45, 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castanada, A. M., Wendel, M. L., & Crockett, E. E. (2015). Overlap in Facebook profiles reflects relationship closeness. Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalina, L. T., & Choi, M. (2015). The couple who Facebooks together, stays together: Facebook self-presentation and relational longevity among college-aged dating couples. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 18, 367–372.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, S. E. (2007). The social construction of romantic relationships in adolescence: Examining the role of peer networks, gender, and race. Sociological Inquiry, 77, 572–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S., & Chan, C. (2007). Perceptions of commitment change during mate selection: The case of Taiwanese newlyweds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, NY: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 556–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark-Ibanez, M., & Felmlee, D. (2004). Interethnic relationships: The role of social network diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterell, J. (2007). Social networks in youth and adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2010). The dark side of personal relationships II. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Klepper, M., Sleebos, E., Van de Bunt, G., & Agneessens, F. (2010). Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes. Social Networks, 32, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doroud, M., Bhattacharyya, P., Wu, S. F., & Felmlee, D. (2011). The evolution of ego-centric triads: A microscopic approach toward predicting macroscopic network properties. 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouin, M., Miller, D. A., & Dibble, J. L. (2014). Ignore your partners’ current Facebook friends: Beware the ones they add! Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Due, P., Holstein, B., Lund, R., Modvig, J., & Avlund, K. (1999). Social relations: Network support and relational strain. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 661–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neocortex size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Machin, A. J. (2014). Sex differences in relationship conflict and reconciliation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 14, 631–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etcheverry, P. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2004). Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Personal Relationships, 11, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etcheverry, P., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. (2013). Predictors of friend approval for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76, 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2014). Casualties of social combat: School networks of peer victimization and their consequences. American Sociological Review, 79, 228–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiring, C. (1999). Other-sex friendship networks and the development of romantic relationships in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D. (2001). No couple is an island: A social stability network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79, 1259–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., & Faris, R. (2013). Interaction in social networks. In Delamater, J. & Ward, A. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (2nd edn., pp. 389–409). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Felmlee, D., & Faris, R. (2016). Toxic ties: Networks of friendship, dating, and cybervictimization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79, 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Close relationships and social psychology: Intersections and future paths. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felmlee, D., Sweet, E., & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Gender rules: Same- and cross-gender friendship norms. Sex Roles, 66, 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Norton, M. I., Reis, H. T., Ariely, D., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Maniaci, M. R. (2015). When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? A proposed integrative model from erstwhile adversaries. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, C. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact?. American Sociological Review, 74, 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (2011). Still connected: Family and friends in America since 1970. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Flynn, H. K., Felmlee, D. H., & Conger, R. (2014). The social context of adolescent friendships: Parents, peers, and romantic partners. Youth and Society, 46, 1–27.Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Anderegg, C. (2014). Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: Uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 17, 685–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girard, Y., Hett, F., & Schunk, D. (2015). How individual characteristics shape the structure of social networks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, G., & Deal, K. H. (2012). Two plus two: Couples and their couple friendships. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallinan, M. T., & Kubitschek, W. (1990). The formation of intransitive friendships. Social Forces, 69, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., & Van Dongen, K. (2015). Friendship network centrality and the performance of soccer players: The role of cognitive accuracy. Human Performance, 28, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, D. L., Doogan, N. J., & Soller, B. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 52, 688–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). What makes you click? – Mate preferences in online dating. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 8, 393–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogerbrugge, M. J. A., Komter, A. E., & Scheepers, P. (2013). Dissolving long-term romantic relationships: Assessing the role of social context. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, G. C., Soto, D., Fujimoto, K., Valente, T. W. (2014). The interplay of friendship networks and social networking sites: Longitudinal analysis of selection and influence effects on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 115–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, J. F., & Rauer, A. J. (2014). Turning inward versus outward: Relationship work in young adults and romantic functioning. Personal Relationships, 21, 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P., & Leslie, L. (1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, D., Markman, H. J., Leveille, S., Chartrand, E., & Begin, J. (1994). Networks’ support and interference with regard to marriage: Disclosures of marital problems to confidants. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, D., Tremblay, N., Belanger, I., Dube, M., Begin, J., & Bouthillier, D. (2000). Interaction structure of husbands’ and wives’ disclosure of marital conflict to the respective best friend. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M. & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces, 79, 1289–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, J. N., & Leonard, K. E. (2004). Social networks, structural interdependence, and marital quality over the transition to marriage: A prospective analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keneski, E., & Loving, T. J. (2014). Network perceptions of daters’ romances. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.) Social influences on close relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 126–147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. J., & Stiff, J. B. (1991). Social networks and the development of close relationships. Human Communication Research, 18, 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreager, D. A., Cavanagh, S. A., Yen, J., & Yu, M. (2014). Where have all the good men gone? Gendered interactions in online dating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledbetter, A. M. (2010). Content- and medium-specific decomposition of friendship relational maintenance: Integrating equity and media multiplexity approaches. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 938–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 40–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, L. A., Huston, T. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1986). Parental reactions to dating relationships: Do they make a difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D. S., Taylor, R. J., Nguyen, A. W., Chatters, L. M., & Himle, J. A. (2015). Family and friendship informal support networks and social anxiety disorder among African Americans and Black Caribbeans. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, K. (2013). The limits of racial prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 18814–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, J. H., Campbell, S. M., & Condie, H. (1995). Ethnocentrism in dating preferences for an American sample: The ingroup bias in social context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating relationship fate with insiders’ and outsiders’ perspectives: Who and what is asked matters. Personal Relationships, 13, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, R. (2011). The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Statistics, Politics, and Policy, 2(1): Article 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGeorge, E. L., & Hall, D. E. (2014). Relationship advice. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.), Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 188–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, W. D., Cohen, J. A., & Smock, P. J. (2011). The role of romantic partners, family, and peer networks in dating couples’ views about cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, 115–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnell, E. A., Birkett, M., & Shattell, M. (2015). The future of big data: Innovative methodological approaches. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 36, 478–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDermott, R., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2013). Breaking up is hard to do, unless everyone else is doing it too: Social network effects on divorce in a longitudinal sample. Social Forces, 92, 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79, 1088–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milardo, R. M., & Helms-Erikson, H. (2000). Network overlap and third-party influence in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (eds.) Close relationships: A handbook (pp. 32–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. M., Johnson, M. P., & Huston, T. L. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murase, Y., Jo, H., Torok, J., Kertesz, J., & Kaski, K. (2015). Modeling the role of relationship fading and breakup in social network formation. PLoS ONE, 10, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niehuis, S. (2005). Alternative monitoring predictors: When the grass looks greener on the other side. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 419–430.Google Scholar
O’Malley, J. (2013). The analysis of social network data: An exciting frontier for statisticians. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 539–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Ragan, D. T. (2015). Social networks and the diffusion of adolescent problem behavior: Reliable estimates of selection and influence from sixth through ninth grades. Prevention Science, 16, 832–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papapolydorou, M. (2014). “When you see a normal person … ”: Social class and friendship networks among teenage students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35, 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papp, L. M., Danielewicz, J., & Cayemberg, C. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 15, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paquin, R. L., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2013). Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organization Studies, 34, 1623–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, P. D., Ciarrochi, J., Heaven, P., Marshall, S., Sahdra, B., & Kiuru, N. (2015). Hope, friends, subjective well-being: A social network approach to peer group contextual effects. Child Development, 86, 642–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, P., & Moody, J. (2003). Structure and sentiment: Explaining emotional attachment to groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petronio, S. & Endes, T. (1985). Dating and the single-parent: Communicating in the social network. Journal of Divorce, 9, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, S. S. (2011). Non-independent mate choice in humans: Deciphering and utilizing information in a social environment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71, 7113.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R., & Capellan, J. (2014). The ties that bind: Linking religious organizational segregation to the individual level closure of close friendship networks. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 4, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). Relationships in human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015). Managing relationship decay: Network, gender and contextual effects. Human Nature, 26, 426–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, L., & Starks, T. J. (2015). Relationship stigma and relationship outcomes in interracial and same-sex relationships: Examination of sources and buffers. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueda, H. A., Lindsay, M., & Williams, L. R. (2015). “She posted in on Facebook”: Mexican American adolescents’ experiences with technology and romantic relationship conflict. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanri, Ç., & Goodwin, R. (2013). Values and love styles in Turkey and Great Britain: An intercultural and intracultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 837–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassler, S., & Miller, A. (2015). The ecology of relationships: The effect of meeting patterns on cohabiting couples’ relationship progression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sautter, J., Tippett, R. M., & Morgan, S. P. (2010). The social demography of Internet dating in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 554–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, D. R., Simpkins, S. D., Vest, A. E., & Price, C. D. (2011). The contribution of extracurricular activities to adolescent friendships: New insights through social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1141–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Friendship networks and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1453–1464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, H. C., & Ellithorpe, C. N. (2014). The new story of Romeo and Juliet. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.) Social influences on close relationships: Beyond the dyad. (pp. 148–170). London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, H. C., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Wright, B. L. (2015). Don’t tell me who I can’t love: A multimethod investigation of social network and reactance effects on romantic relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, H., Hood, K. B., & Wright, B. L. (2014). Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972): Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Social Psychology, 45, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatcher, R. B. (2010). When Harry and Sally met Dick and Jane: Creating closeness between couples. Personal Relationships, 17, 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soller, B. (2015). “I did not do it my way”: The peer context of inauthentic romantic relationships. Sociological Perspectives, 58, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosik, V. S., & Bazarova, N. N. (2014). Relational maintenance on social network sites: How Facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 888–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1255–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadtfield, C. & Pentland, A. (2015). Partnership ties shape friendship networks: A dynamic social network study. Social Forces, 94, 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, T. H. (2015). Understanding the selection bias: Social network processes and the effect of prejudice on the avoidance of outgroup friends. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, J. (2014). Friendship networks and the social structure of opportunities for contact and interaction. Social Science Research, 48, 234–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, L. J., Fiore, S. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 942–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zantvliet, P. I., & Kalmijn, M. (2013). Friendship networks and interethnic union formation: An analysis of immigrant children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 953–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., & Wellman, B. (2010). Social connectivity in America: Changes in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 1148–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welker, K. M., Baker, L., Padilla, A., Holmes, H., Aron, A., & Slatcher, R. B. (2014). Effects of self-disclosure and responsiveness between couples on passionate love within couples. Personal Relationships, 21, 692–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildermuth, S. M. (2004). The effects of stigmatizing discourse on the quality of on-line relationships. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 73–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, B. L. & Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Pulling the strings: Effects of parent and friends opinions on dating choices. Personal Relationships 19, 743–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. L., Sinclair, H. C., & Hood, K. B. (2014). In search of Romeo and Juliet. Journal of Social Psychology 45, 313–314.Google Scholar
Wrzus, C., Hanel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, P., & Chiou, W. (2009). More options lead to more searching and worse choices in finding partners for romantic relationships online: An experimental study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zak, A., Coulter, C., Giglio, S., Hall, J., & Pellowski, N. (2002). Do his friends and family like me? Predictors of infidelity in intimate relationships. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 287–291.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., & Kline, S. L. (2009). Can I make my own decision? A cross-cultural study of perceived social network influence in mate selection. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3), n.p. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142Google Scholar
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar
Ames, M. G., Go, J., Kaye, J. J., & Spasojevic, M. (2010). Making love in the network closet: the benefits and work of family videochat. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 145–154). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1718918.1718946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bangasser-Evans, S., Pearce, K., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. (2016). The affordances test: A conceptual model for understanding affordances in communication research. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Baxter, L. A., & Bullis, C. (1986 ). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469–493. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00088.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 956–977. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, C. (2017, October 16). Smartphone ownership around the world. GlobalWebIndex. Available: https://blog.globalwebindex.net/chart-of-the-day/smartphone-ownership/Google Scholar
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using e-mail for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 530–549. http://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications – A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 467–488. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083–6101.2012.01580.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 571–580). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1909–1912). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10135-10140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222447110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (eds.) (2003). Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotten, S. R., Ford, G., Ford, S., & Hale, T. M. (2012). Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 496–499. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741–3729.2010.00639.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1986). Accounts of relational dissolution: A comparison of marital and non‐marital relationships. Communication Monographs, 53, 311–334. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255–271. http://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173. http://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donath, J. S. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1083–6101.2007.00394.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donath, J. S., & boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82. doi: 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.ccCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, S. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–30.Google Scholar
Duck, S. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Duggan, M., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2014). Social media update. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.Google Scholar
Duguay, S. (2016). “He has a way gayer Facebook than I do”: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site. New Media & Society, 18, 891–907. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814549930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? Open Science, 3(1), n.p. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150292Google ScholarPubMed
Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19–36. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.541336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, N. B. & boyd, D. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In Dutton, W. H. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellison, N. B., Gray, R., Lampe, C., & Fiore, A. T. (2014). Social capital and resource requests on Facebook. New Media & Society 16 (7), pp. 1104–1121. doi: 10.1177/1461444814543998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T. & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as Promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society 14, 45–62. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society 13 (6), 873–892. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, N. B. & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In Sundar, S. (ed.) The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. doi: 10.1177/1529100612436522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, J., Osborn, J. L., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of Facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 527–534. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Romantic partner monitoring after breakups: Attachment, dependence, distress, and post-dissolution online surveillance via social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 491–498. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 3–7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 79–84). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 1–26. doi: 10.1177/0093650205285368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C.-H. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38, 70–100. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1480. doi: 10.1086/225469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., & Afifi, W. A. (1998). Communicative responses to jealousy as a function of self‐esteem and relationship maintenance goals: A test of Bryson’s dual motivation model. Communication Reports, 11, 111–122. http://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011, June 16). Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.Google Scholar
Hampton, K. N., Lee, C., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13, 1031–1039. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810390342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heino, R. D., Ellison, N. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 427–447. doi: 10.1177/0265407510361614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, B. (2013). Pseudonyms and the rise of the real-name web. In Hartley, J., Burgess, J., & Bruns, A. (eds.) A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 290–308). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrigan, J. B., & Duggan, M. (2015). Home broadband 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.Google Scholar
Jiang, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63, 556–577. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A. J., Haigh, M. M., Becker, J. A., Craig, E. A., & Wigley, S. (2008). College students’ use of relational management strategies in email in long‐distance and geographically close relationships. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 381–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1083–6101.2008.00401.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Ahn, J., & Vitak, J. (2015). Korean mothers’ Kakao Story use and its relationship to psychological well-being. First Monday, 20(3), n.p. http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i3.5576Google Scholar
Knapp, M. L., Vangelisti, A. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2013). Interpersonal communication & human relationships (7th edn.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Korchmaros, J. D., Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2015). Adolescent online romantic relationship initiation: Differences by sexual and gender identification. Journal of Adolescence, 40, 54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.01.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 167–170). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Lampe, C., Gray, R., Fiore, A., & Ellison, N. B. (2014). Help is on the way: Patterns of responses to resource requests on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531720Google Scholar
Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, technology and friendships. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2015). Teens, technology, and romantic relationship. Washington, DC: Pew Internet Project.Google Scholar
Leonardi, P. M. (2010). Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday, 15(6), n.p. http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukacs, V., & Quan-Haase, A. (2015). Romantic breakups on Facebook: New scales for studying post-breakup behaviors, digital distress, and surveillance. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 492–508. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, G. J. (1982). Becoming unrelated: The management of bond dissolution. Personal Relationships, 4, 211–231.Google Scholar
McEwan, B., Fletcher, J., Eden, J., & (Bryant) Sumner, E. (2014). Development and validation of a Facebook relational maintenance measure. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 244–263. http://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2014.967844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 299–315. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811412712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, A., & Papacharissi, Z. (2010). Look at us: Collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries. In Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 251–273). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metzger, M. J., Wilson, C., Pure, R. A., & Zhao, B. Y. (2012). Invisible interactions: What latent social interaction can tell us about social relationships in social network sites. In Comunello, D. (ed.) Networked sociability and individualism: Technology for personal and professional relationships (pp. 79–103). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncur, W., Gibson, L., & Herron, D. (2016). The role of digital technologies during relationship breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 371–382). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819925Google Scholar
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444. http://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, M. J. (2009). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In Sears, A. & Jacko, J. A. (eds.) Human–computer interaction: Development process (pp. 166–186). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Mynatt, E. D., O’Day, V. L., Adler, A., & Ito, M. (1998). Network communities: Something old, something new, something borrowed … Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 123–156. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008688205872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), n.p. doi: 10.1111/j.1460–2466.1996.tb01462.xGoogle Scholar
Pearce, K. E., & Vitak, J. (2016). Performing honor online: The affordances of social media for surveillance and impression management in an honor culture. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2595–2612. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 169–174. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies, 58, 315–337. http://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701518405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, A., & Broneck, K. (2009). “IM me”: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 291–314. doi: 10.1177/0265407509106719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, A., & Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication, uncertainty, and information seeking using the Internet. In Afifi, T. D. & Afifi, W. A. (eds.) Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 67–84). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2958.2002.tb00804.xGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287–310. doi: 10.1080/03637750701543493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York, NY: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
Rideout, V. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. Common Sense Media Research. Retrieved April 15, 2016 from www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teensGoogle Scholar
Rueda, H. A., Lindsay, M., & Williams, L. R. (2015). “She posted it on Facebook”: Mexican American adolescents’ experiences with technology and romantic relationship conflict. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 419–445. http://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414565236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenebeck, S., Ellison, N. B., Blackwell, L., Bayer, J., & Falk, E. (2016). Backstalking, impression management, and play: How young adults look back on their teen Facebook use. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 1475–1487). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2818048.2819923Google Scholar
Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246. doi: 1932–8036/20150005Google Scholar
Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591082004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434–445. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzman, F., Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2013). Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 4(2), Article 2. Retrieved April 10, 2016 from http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol4/iss2/2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanis, M. (2008). Health-related on-line forums: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication, 13, 698–714. http://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802415316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705–713. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toma, C., Hancock, J., & Ellison, N. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, S. T. (2013). Facebook use during relationship termination: Uncertainty reduction and surveillance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 788–793. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treem, J., & Leonardi, P. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129853Google Scholar
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents a decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01595.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van De Wiele, C., & Tong, S. T. (2014). Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 619–630). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2632048.2636070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitak, J. (2012 ). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 451–470. http://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitak, J. (2014). Facebook makes the heart grow fonder: Relationship maintenance strategies among geographically dispersed and communication-restricted connections. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 842–853). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531726Google Scholar
Vitak, J., & Kim, J. (2014). “You can’t block people offline”: Examining how Facebook’s affordances shape the disclosure process. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 461–474). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531672Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–91. doi: 10.1177/009365092019001003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (eds.) Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253. doi: 10.1177/0093650208330251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Rubin, Z. (ed.) Doing unto others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Yu, R. P., Mccammon, R. J., Ellison, N. B., & Langa, K. M. (2016). The relationships that matter: social network site use and social wellbeing among older adults in the United States of America. Ageing & Society, 36(9), 1826–1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Agishtein, P., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2013). Cultural variation in adult attachment: The impact of ethnicity, collectivism, and country of origin. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7, 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2010). Rusbult’s investment model and the expansion of the self-expansion model. Personal Relationships, 17, 152–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2013). An interdependence theory analysis of close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 39–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 680–740). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Belgrave, F. Z., & Allison, K. W. (2006). African American psychology: From Africa to America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., Donnellan, M. B., Fleeson, W., Fraley, R. C., Gosling, S. D., King, L. A., Robins, R. W., & Funder, D. C. (2015). Six versions for the future of personality psychology. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 665–689). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.) The handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 2, pp. 413–484). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Blood, R. O. (1967). Love match and arranged marriage: A Tokyo–Detroit comparison. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. G. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1997). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1969.)Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1998). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1973.)Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1998). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1980.)Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. A., & Scott, W. A. (1991). Values. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (eds.) Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 661–753). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (eds.) Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary personality psychology. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calkins, M. W. (1917). The case of self against soul. Psychological Review, 24, 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L., & Simpson, J. A. (2013). The blossoming of relationship science. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 3–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campos, B., Perez, O. F. R., & Guardino, C. (2016). Familism: A cultural value with implications for romantic relationship quality in US Latinos. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, Y. C. (2005). Effects of interaction pattern on family harmony and well-being: Test of interpersonal theory, relational-models theory, and Confucian ethics. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 272–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. M., Harris, A. L., Hasan, M., Votaw, K. L. B., & Fernandez, P. (2015). Concluding thoughts: Interethnic marriage through the lens of interdependence theory. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, A. B. (2010). Just how many different forms of culture are there? American Psychologist, 65, 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2015). Relationships and the self: Egosystem and ecosystem. In Simpson, J. & Dovidio, J. F. (eds.) APA Handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relationships and group processes (pp. 93–116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cross, S. E., Bacon, P., & Morris, M. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997a). Elaboration of models of the self: Reply to Baumeister and Sommer (1997) and Martin and Ruble (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997b). Models of the self: Self-construal theory and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalsky, D., Gohm, C., Noguchi, K., & Shiomura, K. (2008). Mutual self-enhancement in Japan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1950). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Watts & Co. (Original work published 1859.)Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1981). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1871.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. E., & Strube, M. J. (1993). An assessment of romantic commitment among black and white dating couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, H. H. (1991). Scientific racism: The cloak of objectivity. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, H. H., Yee, A. H., Wyatt, G., & Weizmann, F. (1995). Readdressing psychology’s problems with race. American Psychologist, 50, 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 915–981). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeberg, A. L., & Stein, C. H. (1996). Felt obligations toward parents in Mexican-American and Anglo-American young adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaines, S. O. Jr. (1994). Generic, stereotypic, and collectivistic models of interpersonal resource exchange among African American couples. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr. (1995). Relationships between members of cultural minorities. In Wood, J. T. & Duck, S. (eds.) Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 51–88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr. (1997). Culture, ethnicity, and personal relationship processes. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr. (2012). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination revisited: From William James to W. E. B. Du Bois. In Dixon, J., & Levine, M. (eds.) Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 105–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr. (2016). Personality and close relationship processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., Clark, E. M., & Afful, S. E. (2015). Interethnic marriage in the United States: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., & Hardin, D. P. (2013). Interdependence revisited: Perspectives from cultural psychology. In Campbell, L., & Simpson, J. A. (eds.) Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 553–572). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., Henderson, M. C., Kim, M., Gilstrap, S., Yi, J., Rusbult, C. E., Hardin, D. P., & Gaertner, L. A. (2005). Cultural value orientations, internalized homophobia, and accommodation in romantic relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 50, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaines, S. O. Jr., & Ketay, S. (2013). Positive psychology, culture, and personal relationship processes. In Hojjat, M., & Cramer, D. (eds.) Positive psychology of love (pp. 218–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., Marelich, W. D., Bledsoe, K. L., Steers, W. N., Henderson, M. C., Granrose, C. S., Barajas, L., Hicks, D., Lyde, M., Takahashi, Y., Yum, N., Rios, D. I., Garcia, B. F., Farris, K., & Page, M. S. (1997). Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1460–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., & Ramkissoon, M. W. (2008). US/Caribbean relationships. In Karis, T. A., & Killian, K. D. (eds.) Cross-cultural couples: Transborder relationships in the 21st century (pp. 227–250). Binghamton, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., & Reed, E. S. (1994). Two social psychologies of prejudice: Gordon W. Allport, W. E. B. Du Bois, and the legacy of Booker T. Washington. Journal of Black Psychology, 20, 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., & Reed, E. S. (1995). Prejudice: From Allport to Du Bois. American Psychologist, 50, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., Rios, D. I., Granrose, C. S., Bledsoe, K. L., Farris, K. R., Page Youn, M. S., & Garcia, B. F. (1999). Romanticism and interpersonal resource exchange among African American/Anglo and other interracial couples. Journal of Black Psychology, 25, 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, S. O. Jr., Williams, S. L., & Mickelson, K. D. (2013). Support communication in culturally diverse families: The role of stigma. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) Routledge handbook of family communication (2nd edn., pp. 205–221). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galvin, K. M. (2013). The family of the future: What do we face? In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) Routledge handbook of family communication (2nd edn., pp. 531–545). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glenn, N. D. (1989). Intersocietal variation in the mate preferences of males and females. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R. (2009). Changing relations: Achieving intimacy in a time of social transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R., & Pillay, U. (2006). Relationships, culture, and social change. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 695–708). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Haselton, M. G., & Ackerman, J. M. (2015). Evolution and relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Dovidio, J. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 3–32). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories of personality (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P.R. (1994a). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994b). Deeper into attachment theory: Reply to commentaries. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2015). Cultural psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 1423–1464). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Imamoglu, E. O., & Karakitapoglu-Aygun, Z. (2004). Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 277–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, J., & Ellis, B. J. (2013). The development of human reproductive strategies: Toward an integration of life history and sexual selection models. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 771–794). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1982). The varieties of religious experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Original work published 1902.)Google Scholar
James, W. (2010). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). Mansfield Center, CT: Martino Publishing. (Original work published 1890).Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1997). The “stimulus field” for interpersonal phenomena: The source for language and thought about interpersonal events. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 140–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L, Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (2002). Close relationships. New York, NY: Percheron Press. (Original work published 1983.)Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & White, A. E. (2013). Relationships from an evolutionary life history perspective. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 13–38). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lay, C., Fairlie, P., Jackson, S., Ricci, T., Eisenberg, J., Sato, T., Teeaar, A., & Melamud, A. (1998). Domain-specific allocentrism-idiocentrism: A measure of family connectedness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 434–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y. H. W., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China: The impact of centrality of relationship, normative support, and investment model variables. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R. (2008). Pride, prejudice, and ambivalence: Toward a unified theory of race and ethnicity. American Psychologist, 63, 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1934.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messman, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and cross-cultural dimensions. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd edn., pp. 852–877). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1987). Family Environment Scales Manual (2nd edn.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Orbuch, T. L., & Veroff, J. (2002). A programmatic review: Building a two-way bridge between social psychology and the study of the early years of marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce: A 14-year longitudinal study of black couples and white couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., & Holmberg, D. (1993). Becoming a married couple: The emergence of meaning in the early years of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 815–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. M. (2002). Cultural psychology: A new look: Reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51, 918–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Beck, L. A. (2015). Attachment processes in adult romantic relationships. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 33–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, E. S. & Gaines, S. O. Jr. (1997). Not everyone is “different-from-me”: Toward an historico-cultural account of prejudice. Journal of Black Psychology, 23, 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C., Verette, J., Whitney, G., Slovik, L., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabogal, F., Marin, G., Otero-Sabogal, R., VanOss Marin, B., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t? Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, J. A. (1978). Masters of social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2012). When the difference is in the details: A critique of Zentner and Mitura (2012) “Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences.” Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 720–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2003). Are men universally more dismissing than women? Personal Relationships, 10, 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 367–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, M. H., Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, E. R. (1988). Individual change and family development: Individuation as a family process. In Falicov, C. J. (ed.) Family transitions: Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 159–180). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd edn., pp. 131–157). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: American style, Russian style, and Japanese style. Personal Relationships, 1, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the “Romantic Beliefs Scale” and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, C. H. (1992a). The Activities of Daily Living Scale: A measure of enactment in adult family relationships. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Stein, C. H. (1992b). Ties that bind: Three studies of obligation in adult relationships with family. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (3rd edn., Vol. 1, pp. 311–378). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Swann, W. B. Jr., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and identity. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 589–628). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1982). Individualism and collectivism manual. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Balliet, D. (2015). Interdependence theory. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 65–92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Xiaohe, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 7, 709–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalcinkaya, A., Rapoza, K., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2010). Adult attachment in cross-cultural and international research: Universality issues. In Erdman, P. & Ng, K. (eds.) Attachment: Expanding the cultural connections (pp. 197–210). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yee, A. H., Fairchild, H. H., Weizmann, F. & Wyatt, G. E. (1993). Addressing psychology’s problem with race. American Psychologist, 48, 1132–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentner, M., & Mitura, K. (2012). Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar