Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:11:11.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Biopsychosocial Factors in Chronic Pelvic Pain

from Section 2 - Gynaecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Leroy C. Edozien
Affiliation:
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
P. M. Shaughn O'Brien
Affiliation:
Keele University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Latthe, P, Latthe, M, Say, L, Gulmezoglu, M, Khan, KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: A neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathias, S, Kuppermann, M, Liberman, R, Lipschutz, R, Steege, J. Chronic pelvic pain: Prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996; 87(3): 321–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zondervan, KT, Yudkin, PL, Vessey, MP, Jenkinson, CP, Dawes, MG, Barlow, DH, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. British Journal of General Practice 2001; 51: 541–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Zondervan, KT, Yudkin, PL, Vessey, MP, Dawes, MG, Barlow, DH, Kennedy, SH. Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: Evidence from a national general practice database. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999; 106: 1149–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Chronic Pelvic Pain, Initial Management (Green-top Guideline No. 41). Updated December 2014. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg41/. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
Bruckenthal, P. Chronic pelvic pain: Approaches to diagnosis and treatment. Pain Management Nursing 2011; 12(1): S410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, J, Yunker, A, Reynolds, WS, Likis, FE, Sathe, NA, Jerome, RN. Noncyclic Chronic Pelvic Pain Therapies for Women: Comparative Effectiveness. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 41. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–2007-10065-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 11(12)-EHC088-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. January 2012. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?productid=931&pageaction=displayproduct.Google Scholar
Beard, RW, Highman, JH, Pearce, S, Reginald, PW. Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain. Lancet 1984; 2(8409): 946–9.Google ScholarPubMed
European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain. 2012. www.pelvicpain.org.uk/uploads/EAU-%20CPP%20guideline%202012.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Chronic pelvic pain. FAQ099. August 2011. Available at www.acog.org/Patients/FAQs/Chronic-Pelvic-Pain. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
Souza, PP, Romao, APMS, Nakano, AMS, Rosa-e-Silva, JC, Candido-dos-Reis, Nogueira AA, Poli-Neto, OB. Biomedical perspectives about women with chronic pelvic pain: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Clinical Medicine 2012; 3: 411–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, L, Luker, K, Creed, F, Chew-Graham, C. ‘How do you explain a pain that can’t be seen?’ The narratives of women with chronic pelvic pain and their disengagement with the diagnostic cycle. British Journal of Health Psychology 2007; 12(2): 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culley, L, Hudson, N, Mitchell, H, Law, C, Denny, E, Raine-Fenning, N. Endometriosis: improving the wellbeing of couples. Summary report and recommendations. October 2013. www.dmu.ac.uk/documents/research-documents/health-and-life-sciences/reproduction-research/endopart/endopart-study-summary-report-and-recommendations.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
Stones, RW, Selfe, SA, Fransman, S, Horn, SA. Psychosocial and economic impact of chronic pelvic pain. Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000; 14(3): 415–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Howard, FM. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: Promise and pitfalls. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 1993; 48: 357–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souza, PP, Romao, APMS, Nakano, AMS, Rosa-e-Silva, JC, Candido-dos-Reis, Nogueira AA, Poli-Neto, OB. Qualitative research as the basis for a biopsychosocial approach to women with chronic pelvic pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011; 32(4): 165–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamvu, G. Role of hysterectomy in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011; 117(5): 1175–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghaly, AFF, Chien, PFW. Chronic pelvic pain: Clinical dilemma or clinician’s nightmare. Sex Transm Inf 2000; 76: 419–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selfe, SA, Van Vugt, M, Stones, RW. Chronic gynaecological pain: An exploration of medical attitudes. Pain 1998; 77(2): 215–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, L, Pitts, MK, Clark-Carter, D. Chronic pelvic pain: The general practitioners’ perspective. Psychology, Health & Medicine 1999; 4(3): 303–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, L, Escott, D, Luker, K, Creed, F, Chew-Graham, C. Is chronic pelvic pain a comfortable diagnosis for primary care practitioners: A qualitative study. BMC Family Practice 2010: 11(7): doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savidge, CJ, Slade, P, Stewart, P, Li, TC. Women’s perspectives on their experiences of chronic pelvic pain and medical care. J Health Psychol 1998; 42: 103–16.Google Scholar
Venbrux, AC, Sharma, GK, Jackson, ET, Harper, AP, and Hover, L. In Ignacio, EA and Venbrux, AC (eds.), Women’s Health in Interventional Radiology, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5876-1_2, New York: Springer, 2012.Google Scholar
Ghaly, AFF. The psychological and physical benefits of pelvic ultrasonography in patients with chronic pelvic pain and negative laparoscopy. A random allocation trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1994; 14: 269–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwude, JL, Thornton, JG, Morley, S, et al. A randomised trial of photographic reinforcement during postoperative counselling after diagnostic laparoscopy for pelvic pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 January 15; 112(1): 8994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, AAW, van Dorst, E, Jellis, B, van Zuuren, E, Hermans, J, Trimbos, JB. A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 77(5): 740–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheung, YC, Smotra, G, de C Williams, A. Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Cochrane Review. Updated February 2014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008797.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, SA, Lumley, MA, Dooley, JA, Diamond, MP. For whom does it work? Moderators of the effects of written emotional disclosure in a randomised trial among women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychosomatic Medicine 2004; 66: 174–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, JW, Beall, SK. Confronting a traumatic event. Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1986; 95: 274–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, RH, Turk, DC, Farrar, JT, Haythornthwaite, JA, Jensen, MP, Katz, NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT guidelines. Pain 2005; 113: 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, RH, Turk, DC, Peirce-Sandner, S, Baron, R, Bellamy, N, Burke, LB, et al. Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2010; 149: 177–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, BJ, Southall, JL, Raphael, JH, Asford, RL, LeMarchand, K. Narrative review of the impact of disbelief in chronic pain. Pain Management Nursing 2013; 14(3): 161–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grace, VM. Pitfalls of the medical paradigm in chronic pelvic. Baillière’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 14(3): 525–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Grace, VM, MacBride-Stewart, S. Women get this: Gendered meanings of chronic pelvic pain. Health 2007; 11(1): 4767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toye, F, Seers, K, Barker, K. A meta-ethnography of patients’ experiences of chronic pelvic pain: Struggling to construct chronic pelvic pain as ‘rea’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2012; 70(12): 2713–27.Google Scholar
NHS England. Everyone counts: Planning for patients for 2014/15 to 2018/19. www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/5yr-strat-plann-guid-wa.pdf. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
Robinson, A, Lee, V, Kennedy, A, Middleton, L, Rogers, A, Thompson, DG, Reeves, D. A randomised controlled trial of self-help interventions in patients with a primary care diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2006; 55: 643–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seear, K. The third shift: Health, work and expertise among women with endometriosis. Health Psychology Review 2009b; 2: 194206.Google Scholar
Nagelkerk, J, Reick, K, Meengs, L. Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006; 54(2): 151–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitt, V, Lowe, D, Hill, S, Prictor, M, Hetrick, SE, Ryan, R, Berends, L. Involving adults who use mental health services as providers of mental health services to others. 28 March 2013. Cochrane Review. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2/abstract;jsessionid=032E702FC10D4F808F4B2F300F085939.f03t03. Accessed 22 March 2017Google Scholar
Pelvic Pain Support Network UK. www.pelvicpain.org.uk/. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
International Pelvic Pain Society. http://pelvicpain.org/home.aspx. Accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
Edozien, LC. Beyond biology: The biopsychosocial model and its application in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2015; 122(7): 900–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller-Matero, LR, Saulino, C, Clark, S, Bugenski, M, Eshelman, A, Eisenstein, D. When treating the pain is not enough: A multidisciplinary approach for chronic pelvic pain. Archives of Women’s Mental Health epub ahead of print 5 May 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weijenborg, PT, Greeven, A, Dekker, FW, Peters, AAW, ter Kuile, MM. Clinical course of chronic pelvic pain in women. Pain 2007; 132(1): S117–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×