Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:43:43.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Promoting and Implementing the Biopsychosocial Perspective in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

The Role of Specialist Societies

from Section 1 - Generic Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Leroy C. Edozien
Affiliation:
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
P. M. Shaughn O'Brien
Affiliation:
Keele University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borrell-Carrio, F., Suchman, A.L., and Epstein, R.M., The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2004. 2(6): pp. 576–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, M.A., Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ, 1995. 152(9): pp. 1423–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Nimnuan, C., Hotopf, M., and Wessely, S., Medically unexplained symptoms: an epidemiological study in seven specialities. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2001. 51(1): pp. 361–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bitzer, J. et al., [Psychosocial and psychosomatic basic competence of the gynecologist – from intrinsic conviction to a learnable curriculum]. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch, 2001. 41(3): pp. 158–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Leeners, B. et al., Satisfaction with medical information in women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. J Psychosom Res, 2006. 60(1): pp. 3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsky, A.J., Orav, E.J., and Bates, D.W., Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2005. 62(8): pp. 903–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jünger, J. and Köllner, V., Integration of a doctor/patient-communication-training into clinical teaching: examples from the reform-curricula of Heidelberg and Dresden Universities. Psychother Psych Med, 2003. 53: pp. 5664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langewitz, W.A. et al., Improving communication skills – a randomized controlled behaviorally oriented intervention study for residents in internal medicine. Psychosom Med, 1998. 60(3): pp. 268–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinson, W., Doctor-patient communication and medical malpractice: implications for pediatricians. Pediatr Ann, 1997. 26(3): pp. 186–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, N., Bower, P., and Hann, M., The impact of general practitioners’ patient-centredness on patients’ post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med, 2002. 55(2): pp. 283–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertakis, K.D. et al., The influence of gender on physician practice style. Med Care, 1995. 33(4): pp. 407–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christen, R.N., Alder, J., and Bitzer, J., Gender differences in physicians’ communicative skills and their influence on patient satisfaction in gynaecological outpatient consultations. Soc Sci Med, 2008. 66(7): pp. 1474–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J.A. and Roter, D.L., Do patients talk differently to male and female physicians? A meta-analytic review. Patient Educ Couns, 2002. 48(3): pp. 217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krupat, E. et al., The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns, 2000. 39(1): pp. 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topacoglu, H. et al., Analysis of factors affecting satisfaction in the emergency department: a survey of 1019 patients. Adv Ther, 2004. 21(6): pp. 380–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trummer, U.F. et al., Does physician-patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome? A case study. Patient Educ Couns, 2006. 61(2): pp. 299306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whippen, D.A. and Canellos, G.P., Burnout syndrome in the practice of oncology: results of a random survey of 1,000 oncologists. J Clin Oncol, 1991. 9(10): pp. 1916–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzler, M. et al., Dealing with the issue ‘care of the dying’ in medical education – results of a survey of 592 European physicians. Med Educ, 2000. 34(2): pp. 146–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, C.R., The teaching of communication skills in United Kingdom medical schools. Med Educ, 1991. 25(4): pp. 311–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Wiel, H.B. and Wouda, J.C., Evaluative studies in (medical) education. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 29(1): pp. 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alder, J. et al., Communication skills training in obstetrics and gynaecology: whom should we train? A randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2007. 276(6): pp. 605–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dulmen, A.M. and van Weert, J.C., Effects of gynaecological education on interpersonal communication skills. BJOG, 2001. 108(5): pp. 485–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Tschudin, S. et al., Psychosomatics in obstetrics and gynecology – evaluation of a compulsory standardized teaching program. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013. 34(3): pp. 108–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildmann, J. et al., Evaluation of a ‘breaking bad news’ course at the Charite, Berlin. Med Educ, 2001. 35(8): pp. 806–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buddeberg-Fischer, B. et al., Chronic stress experience in young physicians: impact of person- and workplace-related factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2010. 83(4): pp. 373–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulsman, R.L. et al., Teaching clinically experienced physicians communication skills. A review of evaluation studies. Med Educ, 1999. 33(9): pp. 655–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edozien, L.C., Beyond biology: the biopsychosocial model and its application in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2015. 122(7): pp. 900–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EBCOG. Standards of Care for Women’s Health in Europe. 2014; Available from: www.ebcog.eu.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×