ACCC (2013). AER Stakeholder Engagement Framework. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. https://www.aer.gov.au.Google Scholar

AccountAbility (2008). AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard 2011. http://www.accountability.org/standards/aa1000ses/index.html.Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. American Planning Association Journal 35 (4), 216–224. Reprinted by permission of The American Planning Association (http://www.planning.org).Google Scholar

Ashworth, P. (2014). Lessons from project level community engagement. Project No. 7–0414–0227. ANLEC R&D: Canberra.Google Scholar

Ashworth, P., Cormick, C. (2011). Enabling the social shaping of CCS technology. In Havercroft, I., Macrory, R.& Stewart, R.B. (eds.), Carbon Capture and Storage: Emerging Legal and Regulatory Issues. Hart Publishing: London.Google Scholar

Ashworth, P., Einsiedel, E., Howell, R., Brunsting, S., Boughen, N. Boyd, A. et al. (2013). Public preferences to CCS: how does it change across countries? In Proc. 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technology, 18–22 November 2012, Kyoto, Japan. Energy Procedia, Elsevier.Google Scholar

Ashworth, P., Bradbury, J., Wade, S., Feenstra, C.F.J., Greenberg, S., Hund, G. et al. (2012). What's in store: lessons from implementing CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Contro 9, 402–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, P., Boughen, N., Mayhew, M., Millar, F. (2010). From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 426–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradbury, J., Ray, I., Peterson, T., Wade, S., Wong-Parodi, G., Feldpausch, A. (2009). the role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US. Energy Procedia 1(1), 4665–4672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunsting, S., De Best-Waldhober, M., Feenstra, C.F.J., Mikunda, T. (2011). Stakeholder participation practices and onshore CCS: lessons from the Dutch CCS case Barendrecht. Energy Procedia 4, 6376–6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Contandriopoulos, D. (2004). A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Social Science & Medicine 58(2), 321–330.Google Scholar

Cormick, C. (2002). Australian attitudes to GM food and crops – changes in public attitudes to GM technology, Pesticide Outlook 13 (6), 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desbarats, J., Upham, P., Riesch, H., Reiner, D., Brunsting, S., de Best-Waldhober, M. et al. (2010). Review of the public participation practices for CCS and non-CCS projects in Europe. Institute for European Environmental Policy; Brussels.Google Scholar

Duggan, J. (2014). China petrochemical plant may be halted after protests. The Guardian, 2 April 2014. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2014/Apr/02/China-petrochemical-plant-may-be-halted-after-protests. Accessed 10 November 2014.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J.S., et al. (2003). Green States and Social Movements. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar

Earle, T., Siegrist, M. (2008). On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management. Risk Analysis 28, 1395–1414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fiorino, D. (1989). Environmental risk and democractic processes: a critical review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 14, 501–547.Google Scholar

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston.Google Scholar

Franks, D.M., McNab, K., Brereton, D., Cohen, T., Weldegiorgis, F., Horberry, T. et al. (2013). Designing mining technology for social outcomes. Final Report of the Technology Futures Project.Google Scholar

Graafland, J. (2002). Profits and principles: four perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 35, 293–305.Google Scholar

Gunningham, N., Kagan, R.A., Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Social Inquiry 29 (2), 307–341.Google Scholar

Hall, N., Ashworth, P., Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Societal acceptance of wind farms: analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy 58, 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hashagen, S. (2002). Models of community engagement, Scottish Community Development Centre, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Head, B. (2007). Community engagement: participation on whose terms? Australia Journal of Political Science 42, 3.Google Scholar

Huijts, N., Molin, E., Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huijts, N., Molin, E., van Wee, B. (2014). Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: a structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38, 153–166.Google Scholar

IAP2 (2014). Core values for the practice of public participation. IAP2 International Federation 2014. https://www.iap2.org.au/resources/iap2s-public-participation-spectrum.Google Scholar

James, M., Daniel, S. (2013). Moratorium on coal seam gas extraction in Sydney's drinking water zone. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013–11–12/moratorium-placed-on-coal-seam-gas-extraction-in-sydney27s-dri/5087252. Accessed 14 December 2014.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jijelava, D., Vanclay, F. (2014). Assessing the social licence to operate of development cooperation organizations: a case study of Mercy Corps in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia. Journal of Social Epistemology (Special Issue, A Social Licence to Operate) 28 (3–4), 297–317.Google Scholar

Keeney, R. (1998). Value-Focussed Thinking. A Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuppler, S. (2012). From government to governance? (Non-)Effects of deliberation on decision-making structures for nuclear waste management in Germany and Switzerland. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 9 (2), 103–122.Google Scholar

Lacey, J. (2008). Utilising diversity to achieve water equity. Rural Society 18 (3), 244–254.Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Parsons, R., Moffat, K. (2012). Exploring the Concept of a Social Licence to Operate in the Australian Minerals Industry. CSIRO: Brisbane.Google Scholar

McIntyre, J. (1996). Tools for ethical thinking and caring: a reflexive approach to community development theory and practice in the pragmatic 90s. Community Quarterly.Google Scholar

Moffat, K., Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy 39, 61–70.Google Scholar

Muffson, S. (2012). In North Dakota, the gritty side of an oil boom. The Washington Post, 18 July 2012. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/in-north-dakota-the-gritty-side-of-an-oil-boom/2012/07/18/gJQAZk5ZuW_story.html. Accessed 10 December 2012.Google Scholar

Nicholls, F. (2003). When science is not enough: why public engagement is essential for carbon storage projects. Towards Zero Emissions: Strategies and Technologies for Decreasing Industrial GHG Emissions, Brisbane.Google Scholar

Pidd, H. (2014). Anti-fracking group stages day of action. The Guardian, 19 August 2014. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2014/Aug/19/anti-fracking-group-stages-day-of-action. Accessed 12 November 2014.Google Scholar

Pisarski, A., Ashworth, P. (2013). The citizen's round table process: canvassing public opinion on energy technologies to mitigate climate change. Journal of Climatic Change 119 (2), 533–546.Google Scholar

Queensland Parliament (2013). Gasfields Commission Act 2013.Google Scholar

Queensland Parliament (2010). Hansard Record of Proceedings: First session of the Fifty Third Parliament, Tuesday 23 March, 2010. www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/, p. 954.Google Scholar

Reed, M. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141, 2417–2431.Google Scholar

Reed, M., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., et al. (2009). ‘Who's in and why?’ A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 1933–1949.Google Scholar

Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: the role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis 20, 713–720.Google Scholar

Solomon, F. (1999). Zen and the art of stakeholder involvement: the 1999 AMEEF travelling scholarship. In Proc. Minerals Council of Australia Environmental Workshop, Townsville, Queensland. Minerals Council of Australia.Google Scholar

Stern, P.C., Fineberg, H.V. (eds.) (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. (2005). Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B. (eds.), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, Zed Books: London, pp. 218–231.Google Scholar

Mors, E.ter, Weenig, M., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. (2010). Effective communication about complex environmental issues: perceived quality of information about carbon capture and storage (CCS) depends on stakeholder collaboration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (4), 347–357.Google Scholar

Mors, E.ter, Terwel, B.W., Daamen, D.D.L. (2012). The potential of host community compensation in facility siting. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 11S, S130–S138.Google Scholar

Terwel, B., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. (2010). Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16, 173–186.Google ScholarPubMed

Terwel, B.W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D.D.L. (2011). Going beyond the properties of CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) technology: how trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5, 181–188.Google Scholar

Terwel, B.W., Mors, E.ter, Daamen, D.D.L (2012). It's not only about safety: beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 9, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, I. (1998). Environmental Impact Assessment in Australia, 2nd edn. The Federation Press: Sydney, Chapter 4.Google Scholar

Thomson, I., Boutilier, R.G. (2011). The social licence to operate. In Darling, P. (ed.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration. SME: Colorado, pp. 673–690.Google Scholar

UK ESRC (2012). Fracking and public dialogue. Economic and Social Research Council. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/news-and-events/features-casestudies/features/20493/carousel-fracking-and-public-dialogue.aspx.Google Scholar

von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In Owen, R.., Bessant, J. and Heintz, M. (eds.), Responsible Innovation. John Wiley: London, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar

Whatmore, S.J., Landström, C. (2011). Flood apprentices: an exercise in making things public. Economy and Society 40 (4), 582–610.Google Scholar

Wilder, M. (2008). Equity and water in Mexico's changing institutional landscape. In Whiteley, J., Ingram, H. and Perry, R. (eds.), Water, Place and Equity. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 95–116.Google Scholar

Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 (6), 1188–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, A., Moffat, K. (2015). A balancing act: the role of benefits, impacts and confidence in governance in predicting acceptance of mining in Australia. Resources Policy 44, 25–34.Google Scholar