Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:28:05.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Models of Discourse in Systemic Functional Linguistics

from Part II - Discourse Analysis within SFL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Geoff Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Wendy L. Bowcher
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Lise Fontaine
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
David Schönthal
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access

Summary

Hasan says of SFL that 'for a theory that introduces itself as a semiotic one it is woefully neglectful of specifically sociolinguistic issues; its only substantial contribution is in the field of discourse analysis, where it offers a framework for the analysis of social context as well as for that of discourse'. This chapter sets out SFL’s general approach to text analysis and the relation of text to context and illustrates this analysis in practice with reference to several of the most influential models in SFL (Hasan’s Register Analysis; Gregory’s Phase; Martin’s Discourse Semantics; Mann, Thompson, and Matthiessen’s Rhetorical Structure Theory; and Matthiessen’s Appliable Discourse Analysis). Following from the description and illustration of the various approaches, the chapter then considers Hasan’s claim, above, in light of criticisms of the 'textualist' orientation in SFL from prominent discourse analysts in other disciplines (Blommaert, van Dijk, Widdowson). The chapter concludes by evaluating the extent to which the various SFL approaches presented interface with or integrate the social features of context in their descriptive and analytical capacity and by suggesting some ways in which these connections can be enhanced.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, T. H., Boeris, M., Maagerø, E., and Tønnessen, E. S.. 2015. Social Semiotics: Key Figures, New Directions. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, T. 2012. Hybrid Voices and Collaborative Change: Contextualising Positive Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartlett, T. 2013. ‘I’ll Manage the Context’: Context, Environment and the Potential for Institutional Change. In Fontaine, L., Bartlett, T., and O’Grady, G., eds., Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 342–64.Google Scholar
Bartlett, T. 2017. Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Towards Scalar Supervenience? In Bartlett, T. and O’Grady, G., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 375–90.Google Scholar
Bateman, J. A. 2008. Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R.. 2010. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Berry, M. 1981a. Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-layered Approach to Exchange Structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 120–45.Google Scholar
Berry, M. 1981b. Towards Layers of Exchange Structure for Directive Exchanges. Network 2: 2332.Google Scholar
Berry, M. 2016. Dynamism in Exchange Structure. English Text Construction 9(1): 3355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, D. G., Moore, A. R., Henderson-Brooks, C., Meares, R., and Haliburn, J.. 2007. Dissociation, Relatedness and ‘Cohesive Harmony’: A Linguistic Measure of Degrees of ‘Fragmentation’? Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3(3): 263–93.Google Scholar
Cloran, C. 1994. Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into Some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar. Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Cloran, C. 2010. Rhetorical Unit Analysis and Bakhtin’s Chronotope. Functions of Language 17(1): 2970.Google Scholar
Eggins, S. and Slade, D.. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. 1995. Generic Expectancies and Discoursal Surprises: John Donne’s The Good Morrow. In Fries, P. H. and Gregory, M., eds., Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. London: Ablex. 6784.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. Descriptive Linguistics in Literary Studies. In Duthie, A., ed., English Studies Today: Third Series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 23–9.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1989. Language, Context and Text. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1984. Coherence and Cohesive Harmony. In Flood, J., ed., Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. Newark: International Reading Association. 181219.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1989. Semantic Variation and Sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 9: 221–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. 1995. The Conception of Context in Text. In Fries, P. and Gregory, M., eds., Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. London: Ablex. 183284.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 1996. The Nursery Tale as Genre. In Cloran, C., Butt, D., and Williams, G., eds., Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning. London: Cassell. 5172.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2009. Wanted: A Theory for Integrated Sociolinguistics. In Webster, J. J., ed., Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan,Volume 2: Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics. Sheffield: Equinox. 540.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2014. Towards a Paradigmatic Description of Context: Systems, Metafunctions and Semantics. Functional Linguistics 1(9): 154.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. 2016. Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2: Context in the System and Process of Language. Edited by Webster, J. J.. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. and Fries, P.. 1995. Reflections on Subject and Theme: An Introduction. In Hasan, R. and Fries, P., eds., On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. xiii–xlv.Google Scholar
Hasan, R., Cloran, C., Williams, G., and Lukin, A.. 2007. Semantic Networks: The Description of Linguistic Meaning in SFL. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 697738.Google Scholar
Lukin, A. 2012. Meanings in Questions: A Case Study of the ABC’s Current Affairs Coverage of the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. In Bartlett, T. and Chen, H., eds., Special Issue of Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9(1): 424–44.Google Scholar
Lukin, A. 2015. Language and Society, Context and Text: The Contributions of Ruqaiya Hasan. In Bowcher, W. and Liang, J. Y., eds., Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan: Society in Language, Language in Society. London: Palgrave. 143–65.Google Scholar
Lukin, A., Moore, A. R., Herke, M., Wegener, R., and Wu, C.. 2011. Halliday’s Model of Register Revisited and Explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2): 187213.Google Scholar
Mann, W. C. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 1991. Functions of Language in Two Frameworks. Word 42(3): 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A.. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional Theory of Text Organisation. Text (8)3: 243–81.Google Scholar
Mann, W. C., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Thompson, S. A.. 1992. Rhetorical Structure Theory and Text Analysis. In Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A., eds., Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3978.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1999. Modelling Context: A Crooked Path of Progress in Contextual Linguistics. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2561.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2010. Semantic Variation: Modelling Realisation, Instantiation and Individuation in Social Semiosis. In Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds., New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London: Continuum. 134.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maton, K. 2014. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2014. Appliable Discourse Analysis. In Yan, F. and Webster, J. J., eds., Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application. Sheffield: Equinox. 138208.Google Scholar
Moore, A. R. 2017. Register Analysis in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Bartlett, T. and O’Grady, G., eds., 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 418–37.Google Scholar
Scott, C. 2010. Peace and Cohesive Harmony: A Diachronic Investigation of Structure and Texture in ‘End of War’ News Reports in The Sydney Morning Herald. In Yan, F. and Wu, C., eds., Challenges to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 36th ISFC. Beijing: ISFC Organising Committee. 8996.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, R. M.. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. The Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Edited by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., and Souberman, E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, J. J., Chan, J., Yan, V., and Wong, K.. 2013. Visualizing the Architecture and Texture of a Text: A Case Study of Selected Speeches of US President Barack Obama. In Shi, F. and Peng, G., eds., Festschrift in Honour of Prof. William S-Y. Wang’s 80th birthday. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press. 301–24.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 2007. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×