AA.VV. 2002. Nel segno del corvo: Libri e miniature della biblioteca di Mattia Corvino. ModenaGoogle Scholar

Acidalius, V. 1606. Valentis Acidalii epistolarum centuria I. Ed. Acidalius, C.. HannoverGoogle Scholar

Acidalius, V. 1607a. In comedias Plauti, quae exstant, divinationes et interpretationes Valentis Acidalii, nunc primum in lucem editae. Ed. C. Acidalius. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar

Acidalius, V. 1607b. Valentis Acidali intercurrentibus et M. Ant. Mureti, Notae in C. Corn. Taciti opera quae exstant. Collectae a Christiano Acidalio fratre. HannoverGoogle Scholar

Adam, F. 1872. ‘Der Neisser Rector Valens Acidalius’, Siebzehnter Bericht der Philomathie in Neisse vom October 1869 bis zum April 1872 (Neisse), 19–53Google Scholar

Adamietz, J. (ed.) 1989. Marcus Tullius Cicero: Pro Murena. Texte zur Forschung 55. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. 1978. ‘Conventions of naming in Cicero’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 28: 145–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, J. J. G., and de la Mare, A. C. 1969. The Italian Manuscripts in the Library of Major J. R. Abbey. LondonGoogle Scholar

Amalteo, G., Amalteo, G. B., and Amalteo, C. 1627. Trium fratrum Amaltheorum, Hieronimi, Io. Baptistae, Cornelii Carmina: Accessere Hieronymi Aleandri iunioris Amaltheorum cognati Poëmatia. VeniceGoogle Scholar

Andresen, G. 1871. ‘Emendationes Taciti qui fertur dialogi de oratoribus’, Acta societatis philologae Lipsiensis (ed. Ritschl, F.) 1: 103–82Google Scholar

Badian, E. 2009. ‘From the Iulii to Caesar’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (New Malden, MA), 11–22Google Scholar

Baehrens, E. (ed.) 1876–85. Catulli Veronensis carmina, 2 vols. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Bailey, C. 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari: De rerum natura libri sex. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Bake, J. 1852. Scholica hypomnemata, vol. 4. LeidenGoogle Scholar

Ballaira, G. 1982. Per il catalogo dei codici di Prisciano. TurinGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1995. Review of Hintermeier 1993. Journal of Roman Studies 65: 325–7Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1996. Review of Kenney 1996. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 96.12.1Google Scholar

Bardon, H. 1970. Catulli carmina. BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Barile, E., Clarke, P. C., and Nordio, G. 2006. Citadini veneziani del Quattrocento: I due Giovanni Marcanova, il mercante e l’umanista, Memorie Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere, ed Arte (Classe di Scienze Morali, Lettere ed Arte) 117. VeniceGoogle Scholar

Basson, W. P. 1980. ‘The riddle of Catullus 49: Some notes on its interpretation’, Acta Classica 23: 45–52Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. 1993. ‘Logic, rhetoric, and poesis’, Helios 20: 143–72Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. 1998. ‘Dry pumice and the programmatic language of Catullus 1’, Classical Philology 93: 125–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batstone, W. W. 2007. ‘Catullus and the programmatic poem: The origins, scope, and utility of a concept’, in Skinner 2007b: 235–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, M. 1996. Die Epistulae Heroidum XVIII und XIX des Corpus Ovidianum: Echtheitskritische Untersuchungen. PaderbornGoogle Scholar

Bellettini, A. 2010. ‘La tradizione umanistica di Quinto Sereno “Sammonico” e l’Accademia romana’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 51: 201–24Google Scholar

Bembo, P. et al. 1753. Carmina quinque illustrium poetarum. BergamoGoogle Scholar

Benko, S. 1980. ‘Virgil’s fourth eclogue in Christian interpretation’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.31.1: 646–705Google Scholar

Bentley, R. 1905. In Hedicke, E. (ed.), Studia Bentleiana, vol. 5: Ovidius Bentleianus. FreienwaldGoogle Scholar

Bernays, L. 2005. ‘Zum Text der Horaz-Ode 1.4’, Mnemosyne, ser. 4, 58: 282–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettini, M. 2006. ‘Forging identities: Trojans and Latins, Romans and Julians in the Aeneid’, in Jehne, M. and Pfeilschifter, R. (eds), Herrschaft ohne Integration? Rom und Italien in republikanischer Zeit. Studien zur Alten Geschichte 4 (Frankfurt am Main), 269–91Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2008. ‘Weighty words, suspect speech: Fari in Roman culture’, Arethusa 41: 313–75Google Scholar

Bickel, E. 1954. ‘Politische Sibylleneklogen: Die Sibyllenekloge des consularis Piso an Nero und der politische Sinn der Erwähnung des Achilles in der Sibyllenekloge Vergils’, Rheinisches Museum 97: 193–228Google Scholar

Bickel, E. 1957. ‘C. Caesar L.f.’, Rheinisches Museum: 100: 1–41Google Scholar

Binns, J. W. (ed.) 1973. Ovid. LondonGoogle Scholar

Boese, H. 1966. Die lateinischen Handschriften der Sammlung Hamilton zu Berlin. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar

Bolhuis, A. 1950. Vergilius’ vierde Ecloga in de Oratio Constantini ad Sanctorum Coetum. ErmeloGoogle Scholar

Bonnefons, J. 1720. Johannis Bonefonii Arverni carmina. LondonGoogle Scholar

Bornecque, H. (ed.) 1929. Cicéron: Discours, vol. 6. Seconde action contre Verrès, livre V: Les supplices. Collection Budé. ParisGoogle Scholar

Borzsák, S. 1984. Q. Horati Flacci opera. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Boulanger, A. (ed.) 1943. Cicéron: Discours, vol. 11. Pour L. Muréna, Pour P. Sylla. Collection Budé. ParisGoogle Scholar

Boulanger, A. (ed.) 1949. Cicéron: Discours, vol. 17. Pour C. Rabirius Postumus, Pour T. Annius Milon. Collection Budé. ParisGoogle Scholar

Bourne, E. 1916. ‘The messianic prophecy in Vergil’s fourth Eclogue’, The Classical Journal 11: 390–400Google Scholar

Boyd, B. W. (ed.) 2002. Brill’s Companion to Ovid. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brieger, A. 1890. ‘Bericht über die Litteratur zu Lucretius, die Jahre 1885–1889 umfassend’, Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der classischen Althertumswissenschaft 63: 207–35Google Scholar

Bright, D. F. 1976. ‘Confectum carmine munus: Catullus 68’, Illinois Classical Studies 1: 86–112Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. 1951. ‘Justus Lipsius and the text of Tacitus’, Journal of Roman Studies 41: 32–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. 1969. ‘Horatian notes’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society N.S. 15: 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. (ed.) 1971a. Horace on Poetry: The ‘Ars Poetica’. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. 1971b. ‘Horatian notes II’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society N.S. 17: 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. 1982. ‘Horatian notes III’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society N.S. 28: 30–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brouwer, R. 2014. The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. F. 1996. Venice and Antiquity: The Venetian Sense of the Past. New HavenGoogle Scholar

Bruckner, A. 1938. Scriptoria Medii Aevi Helvetica III. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Buchheit, V. 1959. ‘Catulls Dichterkritik in c. 36’, Hermes 87: 309–27Google Scholar

Buescu, V. ed. 1941. Cicéron: Les Aratea. BucarestGoogle Scholar

Burchfield, R. W. (ed.) 1996. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, 3rd edn. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Burlon, A. and Pontin, L. 2008. Rettori veneti a Feltre (con note araldiche): Stemmi e opere dei rettori della città, vol. 2. BellunoGoogle Scholar

Burman, P. 1727a. Sylloges epistularum. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burman, P. 1727b. P. Ovidii Nasonis opera omnia, 4 vols. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Bursian, C. 1883. Geschichte der classischen Philologie in Deutschland von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Munich and LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, D. 2008a. ‘Seven Lucretian emendations’, Eos 95: 97–108Google Scholar

Butterfield, D. 2008b, ‘On the avoidance of eius in Latin poetry’, Rheinisches Museum 151: 151–67Google Scholar

Butterfield, D. 2011. Review of Flores 2009. Gnomon 83: 597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, D. 2013. The Early Textual History of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, D. 2014. ‘Lucretius auctus? The question of interpolation in de rerum natura’, in Martínez, J., (ed.), Fakes and Forgers of Classical Literature: Ergo decipiatur! (Leiden and Boston), 15–42Google Scholar

Cairns, F. 1969. ‘Catullus I’, Mnemosyne 22: 153–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldelli, E. 2007. I codici datati nei Vaticani Latini 1–2100. Vatican CityGoogle Scholar

Cameron, A. 1972. ‘Callimachus on Aratus’ sleepless nights’, Classical Review N.S. 22: 169–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carilli, M. 1975. ‘Le nugae di Catullo e l’epigramma greco’, Annali di Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 5: 925–53Google Scholar

Casali, S. 1997/8. ‘Apollo, Ovid and the foreknowledge of criticism (Ars 2.493–512)’, Classical Journal 93: 19–27Google Scholar

Casali, S. 1998. ‘Ovidio e la preconoscenza della critica: Qualche generalizzazione a partire da Heroides 14’, Philologus 142: 93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casali, S. 2007. ‘Killing the father’, in Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds), Ennius perennis: The Annals and Beyond, Cambridge Classics Journal Supplementary Volume 31 (Cambridge), 222–40Google Scholar

Casali, S. 2010. ‘The development of the Aeneas legend’, in Farrell, J. and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds), A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and its Tradition (New Malden, MA), 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casson, L. 1971. Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World. PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Chapman, R. W. (ed.) 1998. James Boswell: Life of Johnson. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Chatelain, E. 1884–1900. Paléographie des classiques latins. ParisGoogle Scholar

Chaudhuri, S. 1989. Renaissance Pastoral and its English Developments. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Cicogna, E. 1866. ‘Cenni intorno la vita e le opere di Pietro Michiel, poeta del secolo XVII’, Memorie dell’ I. R. Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 13: 387–400Google Scholar

Citroni, M. 1979. ‘Destinatario e pubblico nella poesia di Catullo: I motivi funerari (carmi 96, 101, 68, 65)’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 2: 43–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Citroni, M. 1995. Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: Forme della communicazione letteraria. Rome and BariGoogle Scholar

Claassen, J. M. 1999. Displaced Persons: The Literature of Exile from Cicero to Boethius. LondonGoogle Scholar

Clancy, J. P. 1960. The Odes and Epodes of Horace. ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. C. (ed.) 1895. M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro T. Annio Milone ad iudices oratio. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. C. (ed.) 1901. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, vol. 2: Pro Milone, Pro Marcello, Pro Ligario, Pro rege Deiotaro, Philippicae I–XIV, 1st edn. Oxford Classical Texts. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. C. (ed.) 1905. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, vol. 1: Pro Sex. Roscio, De imperio Cn. Pompei, Pro Cluentio, In Catilinam, Pro Murena, Pro Caelio. Oxford Classical Texts. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. C. (ed.) 1918. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, vol. 2: Pro Milone, Pro Marcello, Pro Ligario, Pro rege Deiotaro, Philippicae I–XIV, 2nd edn. Oxford Classical Texts. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Clark, S. B. 1908. ‘The authorship and date of the double letters in Ovid’s Heroides’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 19: 121–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausen, W. 1976. ‘Catulli Veronensis liber’, Classical Philology 71: 37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauss, J. J. 1995. ‘A delicate foot on the well-worn threshold: Paradoxical imagery in Catullus 68b’, American Journal of Philology 116: 237–53Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. 1993. ‘The generation of monsters in Hesiod’, Classical Philology 88: 105–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clay, J. 2003. Hesiod’s Cosmos. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clough, C. H. 1990. ‘Chivalry and magnificence in the golden age of the Italian Renaissance’, in Anglo, S. (ed.), Chivalry in the Renaissance (Woodbridge), 25–47.Google Scholar

Coates, A., Jensen, K., Dondi, C., Wagner, B., and Dixon, H. 2005. A Catalogue of Books Printed in the Fifteenth Century now in the Bodleian Library. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Comparetti, D. 1895. Vergil in the Middle Ages, tr. Benecke, E. F. M.. LondonGoogle Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation. CornellGoogle Scholar

Conte, G.B. 1999. Latin Literature: A History. BaltimoreCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conte, G.B. (ed.) 2009. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis. Berlin and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Conte, G.B. 2013. Ope ingenii: Experiences of Textual Criticism. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copley, F. O. 1957. ‘The unity of Catullus 68: A further view’, Classical Philology 52: 29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppel, B. 1973. Das Alliusgedicht: Zur Redaktion des Catullcorpus. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (ed.). 2013. The Fragments of the Roman Historians. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Coronati, L. 1984. ‘Osservazioni sulla traduzione greca della IV ecloga di Virgilio’, Civiltà classica e cristiana 5: 71–84Google Scholar

Costa, C. D. N. ed. 1984. Lucretius: De rerum natura V. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Costa, G. 1972. La leggenda dei secoli d’oro nella letteratura italiana. BariGoogle Scholar

Courcelle, P. 1957. ‘Les exégèses chrétiennes de la quatrième Eglogue’, Revue des études anciennes 59: 294–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. 1965. ‘Ovidian and non-Ovidian Heroides’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 12: 63–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Courtney, E. 1996/7. ‘Catullus’ yacht (or was it?)’, Classical Journal 92: 113–22Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1997–8. ‘Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and non-Ovidian Heroides again’, Classical Journal 93: 157–66Google Scholar

Cowan, R. 2009. ‘Scanning Iulus: Prosody, position and politics in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 55: 3–12Google Scholar

Cox-Rearick, J. 1984. Dynasty and Destiny in Medici Art: Pontormo, Leo X, and the Two Cosimos. PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Csapodi, C. and Csapodi-Gárdonyi, K. 1969. Biblioteca Corviniana, trans. from German by Horn, Z.. ShannonGoogle Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. 1996. ‘I prodigi dell’arco di Amore: un paradosso ovidiano e una croce testuale (Ov. her. 16,39)’, Materiali e Discussioni 37: 239–43Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. 2012. ‘Nonae Decembres: un’interpolazione in Hor. carm. 3, 18, 9–16’, Materiali e Discussioni 68: 203–21Google Scholar

Cumming, J. E. 1992. ‘Music for the Doge in early Renaissance Venice’, Speculum 67: 324–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, M. P. (ed.). 1966. Aurelii Prudentii Clementis carmina. Corpus Christianorum Latinum 126. TurnhoutGoogle Scholar

Dawe, R. D. 1990. ‘Richard Porson’, in Briggs, W. W. and Calder, W. M. III (eds), Classical Scholarship: A Biographical Encyclopedia (New York and London), 376–88Google Scholar

de la Mare, A. C. 1985. ‘New research on humanistic scribes in Florence’, in Garzelli, A., Miniatura fiorentina del rinascimento 1440–1525: Un primo censimento. Inventari e Cataloghi Toscani 18 and 19, 1: 393–600Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. 1951 Due studi catulliani. GenoaGoogle Scholar

Delz, J. 1973. ‘Glossen im Horaztext?’, Museum Helveticum 30: 50–4Google Scholar

Delz, J. 1979. ‘Textkritische Versuche an der Ars Poetica des Horaz’, Museum Helveticum 36: 142–52Google Scholar

Delz, J. 1988. Review of Shackleton Bailey 1985, Gnomon 60: 494–501Google Scholar

Deufert, M. 1996. Pseudo-Lukrezisches im Lukrez: Die unechten Verse in Lukrezens ‘De rerum natura’. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deufert, M. 1998. ‘Die Lukrezemendationen des Francesco Bernardino Cipelli’, Hermes 126: 370–39Google Scholar

Deufert, M. 1999. ‘Lukrez und Marullus: Ein kurzer Blick in die Werkstatt eines humanistischen Interpolators’, Rheinisches Museum 142: 210–23Google Scholar

Deufert, M. 2002. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deufert, M., Gaertner, J.-F., and Winterbottom, M. 2002. ‘Critical notes on the Heroides’, Hermes 130: 502–6Google Scholar

Deutsch, R. E. 1939. The Pattern of Sound in Lucretius. Dissertation. Bryn MawrGoogle Scholar

Dickey, E. 2002. Latin Forms of Address from Plautus to Apuleius. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, R. J. 1973. ‘The “Tristia”: Poetry in exile’, in Binns 1973: 154–90Google Scholar

Diels, H. 1918. ‘Lukrezstudien I’, Sitzungsberichte der deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Klasse für Sprache, Literatur und Kunst, 912–39Google Scholar

Diggle, J. 1967. ‘Notes on the text of Ovid, Heroides’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 17: 136–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dihle, A. 1953. ‘Acidalius, Valens’, Neue Deutsche Biographie 1: 34Google Scholar

Dingel, J. 1997. Kommentar zum 9. Buch der Aeneis Vergils. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Dörrie, H. 1960. Untersuchungen zur Überlieferungsgeschichte von Ovids Epistulae Heroidum, Nachr.d.Akad.Göttingen, Phil.-Hist.kl. 5: 113–230, 7: 359–423Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. 1971. P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum. BerlinGoogle Scholar

Dorez, L. 1892. ‘La bibliothèque de Giovanni Marcanova’, in AA.VV. Mélanges G. B. de Rossi (Rome), 113–25Google Scholar

Draeger, A. 1882. Ueber Syntax und Stil des Tacitus. 3rd edn. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Du Quesnay, I. M. LeM., and Woodman, A. J. (eds) 2012. Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edgeworth, R. J. (2011). ‘Ascanius’ mother’, Hermes 129: 246–50Google Scholar

Effe, B. 1977. Dichtung und Lehre: Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar

Eidinow, J. C. S. 2003. ‘Dido, Aeneas, and Iulus: Heirship and obligation in Aeneid 4’, Classical Quarterly 53: 260–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenhut, W. 1983. Catulli Veronensis liber. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Elder, J. P. 1951. ‘Some conscious and subconscious elements in Catullus’ poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 60: 101–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elder, J. P. 1967. ‘Catullus 1, his poetic creed, and Nepos’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 71: 143–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. 1889. A Commentary on Catullus, 2nd edn. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Engelbrecht, W. 1993a. ‘Der Francofortanus und die Epistula Sapphus’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 28.2: 51–7Google Scholar

Engelbrecht, W. 1993b. ‘Einige Korrekturen zur Überlieferung der Heroiden Ovids’, Studia minora facultatis philosophicae universitatis Brunensis E, Series archaeologica et classica 38: 183–94Google Scholar

Ernesti, J. A. (ed.) 1772. C. Cornelii Taciti opera. 2nd edn. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Ernesti, J. A. (ed.) 1810. M. Tullii Ciceronis opera omnia, vol. 2.1. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskuche, G. 1890. ‘Die Elisionen in den zwei letzten Füssen des lateinischen Hexameters’, Rheinisches Museum 45: 236–65, 385–418Google Scholar

Fabbri, P. 1930. ‘L’egloga quarta e Costantino il Grande’, Historia 4: 228–35Google Scholar

Fakas, C. 2001. Der hellenistische Hesiod: Arats Phaenomena und die Tradition der antiken Lehrepik. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. 1996. Roman Literary Culture from Cicero to Apuleius. BaltimoreGoogle Scholar

Fantuzzi, M., and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Farrell, J. 2009. ‘The impermanent text in Catullus and other Roman poets’, in Johnson and Parker 2009: 164–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fear, T. 1992. ‘Catullus 68A: Veronae turpe, Catulle, esse’, Illinois Classical Studies 17: 245–63Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. 1998. ‘Congetturare sì, ma con cautela’, in Ferrari, A. (ed.), Filologia classica e filologia romanza: Esperienze ecdotiche a confronto (Spoleto), 267–80Google Scholar

Fedeli, P., and Ciccarelli, I., I. (eds). 2008. Q. Horatii Flacci carmina liber IV. FlorenceGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. 1992. ‘“Shall I compare thee …?” Catullus 68b and the limits of analogy’, in Woodman, A. J. and Powell, J. (eds), Author and Audience in Latin Literature (Cambridge), 33–44 and 220–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. 2012. ‘Representation and the materiality of the book in the polymetrics’, in Duquesnay and Woodman 2012: 29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, J. 1966. ‘Catullus and Cicero’, Latomus 25: 871–2Google Scholar

Finch, C. E. 1960. ‘The Periegesis of Priscian in codex Vaticanus latinus 3409’, Manuscripta 4: 19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, U. 1969. Ignotum hoc aliis ille nouauit opus: Beobachtungen zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Briefpaare her. 16 und 17 (Paris und Helena) und her. 20 und 21 (Acontius und Cydippe). AugsburgGoogle Scholar

Fisher, C. D. (ed.) 1906. Cornelii Taciti annalium ab excessu divi Augusti libri. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, LA and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischer, M. P. 1981. ‘“Are women human?” The debate of 1595 between Valens Acidalius and Simon Gediccus’, The Sixteenth Century Journal 12: 107–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flores, E. 2009. T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri V–VI. NaplesGoogle Scholar

Floyd, E. D. 2001. ‘Eusebius’ Greek version of Vergil’s fourth eclogue’, in Blumenfeld-Kosinski, R., von Flotow, L., and Russell, D. (eds), The Politics of Translation in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (Tempe), 57–67Google Scholar

Forbiger, A. 1824. De T. Lucretii Cari carmine a scriptore serioris aetatis denuo pertractato. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. 2000. Roman Constructions. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, D. 2002. Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De rerum natura Book Two, Lines 1–332. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, E. 1962. Review of Fordyce 1961, Gnomon 34: 253–63Google Scholar

Fredricksmeyer, E. A. 1973. ‘Catullus 49, Cicero, and Caesar’, Classical Philology 68: 268–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, L. 1936. Studien zur Bildgeschichte der Sybillen in der neueren Kunst. HamburgGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, G. 1908. Catulli Veronensis liber. Leipzig and BerlinGoogle Scholar

Furneaux, H. (ed.) 1896. The Annals of Tacitus, vol. 1: Books I–VI. 2nd edn. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. 2005. Ovid, Epistulae ex Ponto, Book 1. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. 1994. Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. (ed.) 2009. Lucretius: De rerum natura V. WarminsterGoogle Scholar

Gale, M. 2012. ‘Putting on the yoke of necessity: Myth, intertextuality and moral agency in Catullus 68’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman 2012: 184–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galley, M. 2010. La Sibylle: De l’antiquité à nos jours. ParisGoogle Scholar

Gamberale, L. 2013. San Gerolamo intellettuale e filologo. RomeGoogle Scholar

Ganda, A. 1985. ‘Il “tipografo del Servius H 14708” ha un nome: Domenico Giliberti da Vespolate’, La Bibliofilia 87: 227–65Google Scholar

Calvo, García, A. 1997. T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura. ZamoraGoogle Scholar

Gatz, B. 1967. Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen. HildesheimGoogle Scholar

Gee, E. 2000. Ovid, Aratus and Augustus: Astronomy in Ovid’s Fasti. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Gee, E. 2001. ‘Cicero’s astronomy’, Classical Quarterly 51. 520–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gee, E. 2013a. Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gee, E. 2013b. ‘Cicero’s poetry’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (Cambridge), 88–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Lewin, J. E.. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geer, R. 1964. Epicurus: Letters, Principal Doctrines and Sayings. IndianapolisGoogle Scholar

Gerber, A., and Greef, A. 1903. Lexicon Taciteum. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Gibson, B. J. 1995. ‘Catullus 1.5–7’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 45: 569–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, M. 1977. ‘The collected works of Priscian: The printed editions 1470–1859’, Studi Medievali, ser. 3, 18.1: 250–60Google Scholar

Gionta, D. 2007. ‘Marcanova (da/de Mercatonovo), Giovanni’, in Dizionario biografico degli Italiani 69: 476–82Google Scholar

Girardet, K. M. 2013. ‘Die Christianisierung der 4. Ekloge Vergils durch Kaiser Konstantin d. Gr.’, Gymnasium 120: 549–84Google Scholar

Gneisse, C. 1878. De versibus in Lucretii carmine repetitis. StrassburgGoogle Scholar

Gnilka, C. 2000. Prudentiana, vol. 1: Critica, Munich and LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Gold, B. K. 1987. Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome. Chapel Hill and LondonGoogle Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. 1961. ‘Renaissance and golden age’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24: 306–9 = Gombrich 1966: 29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. 1966. Norm and Form: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance. LondonGoogle Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.) 1972. The Annals of Tacitus Books 1–6, vol. 1: Annals 1.1–54. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.) 1981. The Annals of Tacitus Books 1–6, vol. 2: Annals 1.55–81 and Annals 2. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Goold, G. P. 1958. ‘A new text of Catullus’, Phoenix 12: 93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goold, G. P. 1974. Review of Dörrie 1971, Gnomon 46: 475–84Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. 1977. Ovid, Heroides, Amores, with an English Translation by Grant Showerman, 2nd edn revised by G. P. Goold, Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Goold, G. P. 1981. ‘Two notes on Catullus 1’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 6: 233–8Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. 1983. Catullus: Edited with Introduction, Translation and Notes. LondonGoogle Scholar

Goold, G. P. (ed.) 1985. M. Manilii Astronomica. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. 2009. ‘The ends of the beginning: Horace, Satires I’, in Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M. (eds), Perceptions of Horace: A Roman Poet and his Readers (Cambridge), 39–60Google Scholar

Gowers, E. 2011. ‘Trees and family trees in the Aeneid’, Classical Antiquity 30: 87–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. (ed.) 2012. Horace: Satires Book 1. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Gozzadini, G. 1839. Memorie per la vita di Giovanni II Bentivoglio. BolognaGoogle Scholar

Graf, A. 1915. Roma nella memoria e nelle immaginazioni del medio evo. TurinGoogle Scholar

Grafton, A. 2009. Worlds Made by Words: Scholarship and Community in the Modern West. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Grant, W. L. 1957. ‘A classical theme in Neo-Latin’, Latomus 16: 690–706Google Scholar

Grant, W. L. 1965. Neo-Latin Literature and the Pastoral. Chapel HillGoogle Scholar

Green, S. J. 2004. Ovid, Fasti 1: A Commentary. Mnemosyne Supplement 251. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, L. H. G. (trans.) 1935. Cicero, vol. 8: The Verrine Orations, vol. 2. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA and LondonGoogle Scholar

Gronovius, J. F. (ed.) 1672. C. Cornelii Taciti opera quae exstant. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Gronovius, J. G. (ed.) 1721. C. Cornelii Taciti opera quae exstant. UtrechtGoogle Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. 2012. ‘Catullus and the Garland of Meleager’, in Du Quesnay and Woodman 2012: 79–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadas, D. 2013. ‘Christians, sibyls and Eclogue 4’, Recherches Augustiniennes et Patristiques 37: 51–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Håkanson, L. (ed.) 1989. L. Annaeus Seneca Maior: oratorum et rhetorum sententiae, diuisiones, colores. LepzigGoogle Scholar

Hall, J. B. 1990. ‘Conjectures in Ovid’s Heroides’, Illinois Classical Studies 15: 263–92Google Scholar

Hall, J. B. 1999. ‘Critical observations on the text of Ovid’s amatory works’, in Braund, S. and Mayer, R. G. (eds), Amor / Roma: Eleven Essays (and One Poem) by Former Research Students Presented to E. J. Kenney on his Seventy-fifth Birthday. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volume 22, 94–103Google Scholar

Halm, K. (ed.) 1866. Ciceros Rede für L. Murena. BerlinGoogle Scholar

Halm, K. 1875. ‘Acidalius, Valens’, Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, herausgegeben von der Historischen Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1: 31–3Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 1987. ‘Ships and ship-names in the Aeneid’, in Whitby, Hardie and Whitby 1987: 163–71Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2011. Rumour and Renown. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. 2014. The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. J. 1990. ‘Cicero’s “De temporibus suis”: The evidence reconsidered’, Hermes 118: 455–63Google Scholar

Haupt, M. 1876. ‘Ueber die Kritik der horazischen Gedichte’, in Opuscula 3.1 (Leipzig): 42–61Google Scholar

Hawes, G. 2014. Rationalizing Myth in Antiquity. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, S. 2011. ‘Catullus’ Furius’, Classical Philology 106: 254–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. J. 1991. The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. New York and OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, J. 1997. ‘Not wavering but frowning: Ovid as isopleth (Tristia 1 through 10)’, Ramus 26: 139–73Google Scholar

Hentze, W. (ed.) 1999. De Karolo rege et Leone papa: Der Bericht über die Zusammenkunft Karls des Grossen mit Papst Leo III. in Paderborn 799 in einem Epos für Karl den Kaiser; mit vollständiger Farbreproduktion nach der Handschrift der Zentralbibliothek Zürich, Ms. C 78 und Beiträgen von Lutz E. von Padberg, Johannes Schwind und Hans-Walter Stork. PaderbornGoogle Scholar

Herren, M. W. 2012. ‘The Graeca in the tituli of Lucretius: What they tell us about the archetype’, Wiener Studien 125: 107–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heubner, H. (ed.) 1964. ‘Umstrittene Tacitusstellen’, Wiener Studien 77: 138–43Google Scholar

Heubner, H. (ed.) 1994. P. Cornelii Taciti libri qui supersunt, vol. 1: Ab excessu diui Augusti. Editio correctior. Stuttgart and LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. 1995. ‘Dividing poems’, in Pecere, O. and Reeve, M. D. (eds), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Spoleto), 117–48Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. 2007. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. 2012. Review of McKie 2009, Classical Review 62: 493–6Google Scholar

Hinds, S. J. 1985. ‘Booking the return trip: Ovid and Tristia 1’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 31: 13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinds, S. J. 2001. ‘Cinna, Statius, and “immanent literary history” in the cultural economy’, in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.), L’Histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine, Entretiens Hardt 47 (Geneva), 221–57Google Scholar

Hintermeier, C. 1993. Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation. StuttgartGoogle Scholar

Hofmann, J. B., and Szantyr, A. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. MunichGoogle Scholar

Hollis, A. S. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 BC–AD 20. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Holzberg, N. 1997. Ovid: Dichter und Werk. MunichGoogle Scholar

Hopman, M. 2012. Scylla. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. 1995. A Companion to the Study of Virgil. LeidenGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. 2008. Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary. Leiden and BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Housman, A. E. 1882. ‘Horatiana’, Journal of Philology 10: 187–96 = Housman 1972: 1–8Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (ed.) 1903. M. Manilii Astronomicon liber primus. LondonGoogle Scholar

Housman, A. E. (ed.) 1926. M. Annaei Lucani Belli ciuilis libri decem. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Housman, A. E. (ed.). 1930. M. Manilii Astronomicon liber quintus. LondonGoogle Scholar

Housman, A. E. 1972. The Classical Papers of A. E. Housman, 3 vols, ed. Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F. R. D.. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, T. K. 1984. ‘Catullus 68: The text as self-demystification’, Arethusa 17: 29–49Google Scholar

Hunter, R. 1995. ‘Written in the stars: Poetry and philosophy in the Phainomena of Aratus’, Arachnion 2: 1–34 (http://www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num2/hunter.html)Google Scholar

Hunter, R. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Ijsewijn, J. 1983. ‘An admirer of Justus Lipsius: The German neo-Latin poet and philologist Valens Acidalius’, Academiae Analecta: Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van Belgie. Klasse der Letteren 45: 183–206Google Scholar

Ijsewijn, J 1985. ‘Acidalius, Valens’, in Roloff, H.-G. (ed.), Die Deutsche Literatur: Biographisches und bibliographisches Lexikon II.A.1–2 (Bern), 74–92Google Scholar

Ingalls, W. B. 1971. ‘Repetition in Lucretius’, Phoenix 25: 227–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingleheart, J. 2010. A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia, Book 2. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Ingleheart, J. 2012. ‘Ovid’s scripta puella: Perilla as poetic and political fiction in Tristia 3.7’, Classical Quarterly 62: 227–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jachmann, G. 1925. Review of W. Kroll (ed.), C. Valerius Catullus, Gnomon 1: 200–14Google Scholar

Jachmann, G. 1943. ‘Studien zu Juvenal’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Philologisch-Historische Klasse: 187–266 = Jachmann 1982: 746–825Google Scholar

Jachmann, G. 1949. ‘Vom frühalexandrinischen Homertext’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaft in Göttingen. Philologisch-Historische Klasse: 167–224 = Jachmann 1982: 826–83Google Scholar

Jachmann, G. 1982. Textgeschichtliche Studien. KönigsteinGoogle Scholar

Janan, M. 1994. When the Lamp is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale and EdwardsvilleGoogle Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D., 1967. The Tragedies of Ennius. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D., 1985. ‘The annotations of M. Valerius Probus, III: Some Vergilian scholia’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 35: 466–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. A. 2009. ‘Constructing elite reading communities in the high empire’, in Johnson and Parker 2009: 320–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. A. 2010. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. New York and OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. A., and Parker, H. N. (eds) 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar

Kalb, A. 1900. De duodeseptuagesimo carmine Catulli. AnsbachGoogle Scholar

Kallendorf, C. 1995. ‘From Virgil to Vida: The poeta theologus in Italian Renaissance commentary’, Journal of the History of Ideas 56: 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kallendorf, C. 1999. Virgil and the Myth of Venice: Books and Readers in the Italian Renaissance. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantorowicz, E. H. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Kasten, H. (ed.) 1972. M. Tullius Cicero, Fasc. 18: Oratio pro L. Murena, 3rd edn. Bibliotheca Teubneriana. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (ed.) 1995. Suetonius: De grammaticis et rhetoribus. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Keller, O., and Holder, A. (eds) 1899–1925. Q. Horati Flacci opera. Leipzig and JenaGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. 1984. ‘The epistolary mode and the first of Ovid’s Heroides’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 34: 413–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1961. Review of Dörrie 1960. Gnomon 33: 483–4Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1970a. ‘Notes on Ovid: III’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 169–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1970b. Review of R. A. B. Mynors, P. Vergili Maronis opera (Oxford, 1969), Journal of Roman Studies 60: 259–61Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1974. The Classical Text: Aspects of Editing in the Age of the Printed Book. Berkeley, LA, and LondonGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1979. ‘Two disputed passages in the Heroides’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 29: 394–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1982. ‘Ovid’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2: Latin Literature (Cambridge), 420–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1996. Ovid, Heroides XVI–XXI. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 1999. ‘Vt erat nouator: Anomaly, innovation and genre in Ovid, Heroides 16–21’, in Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (eds), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry, Proceedings of the British Academy 93, 399–414Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. 2014. Lucretius: De rerum natura III, 2nd edn. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Kiessling, A. 1877. Analecta Catulliana, GreifswaldGoogle Scholar

Kinsey, T. E. 1967. ‘Some problems in Catullus 68’, Latomus 26: 35–53Google Scholar

Kiss, D. 2008. ‘Catullo 68, 10: Munera Veneris’, Philologus 152: 345–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingner, F., ed. 1959. Q. Horati Flacci opera, 3rd edn. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Klotz, A. (ed.) 1918. M. Tullius Cicero, Fasc. 8: Orationes pro T. Annio Milone, pro M. Marcello, pro Q. Ligario, pro rege Deiotaro. Bibliotheca Teubneriana. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Klotz, A. (ed.) 1949. M. Tullius Cicero, Fasc. 13: In C. Verrem actionis secundae libri IV, V, 2nd edn. Bibliotheca Teubneriana. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Knox, P. E. 2000. Review of Beck 1996. Gnomon 72: 405–8Google Scholar

Kraus, H. P. 1979. Catalogue 153: Bibliotheca Phillippica. Manuscripts on Vellum and Paper from the 9th to the 18th Centuries from the Celebrated Collection Formed by Sir Thomas Phillips. The Final Selection. New YorkGoogle Scholar

Kristeller, P. O. 1989. Iter Italicum, vol. 4. London and LeidenGoogle Scholar

Kroll, W. 1923. C. Valerius Catullus herausgegeben und erklärt, 2nd edn. Leipzig and BerlinGoogle Scholar

Krostenko, B. A. 2001. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago and LondonGoogle Scholar

Krostenko, B. A. 2007. ‘Catullus and elite republican social discourse’, in Skinner 2007b: 212–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1962. Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, 4th edn. MunichGoogle Scholar

Kuntz, F. 1962. Die Sprache des Tacitus und die Tradition der lateinischen Historikersprache. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Lachmann, K. 1876. ‘De Ovidii epistulis’, in Kleinere Schriften zur classischen Philologie (Berlin), 56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacki, G. C. 2013. A Conspiracy of Love: Exile and the Double Heroides. Dissertation. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Landolfi, L. 1985. ‘I carmi metaletterari neoterici fra Programmgedicht e stilemi formulari’, Corolla Londiniensis 4: 89–100Google Scholar

Latta, B. 1972. ‘Zu Catulls Carmen 1’, Museum Helveticum 29: 201–13Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. 1991. ‘Was hatte Catull in der Kapsel, die er von Rom nach Verona mitnahm? Zu Aufbau und Aussage der Allius-Elegie’, Rheinisches Museum 134: 311–26Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. 2012. The Lives of the Greek Poets, 2nd edn. BaltimoreCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. 2007. ‘Catullus and elite republican social discourse’, in Skinner 2007b: 212–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenchantin de Gubernatis, M. (ed.) 1957–60. Q. Horati Flacci opera. 2nd edn rev. by Bo, D.. TurinGoogle Scholar

Lenz, C. 1937. Die wiederholten Verse bei Lukrez. Dissertation. DresdenGoogle Scholar

Leônij, L. 1858. Vita di Bartolommeo di Alviano. TodiGoogle Scholar

Letta, C. 2010. ‘Il nome di Iulo e le sue etimologie in Catone’, in Ajello, R., Berrettoni, P., Fanciullo, F., Marotta, G., and Motta, F. (eds), Quae omnia bella devoratis: Studi in memoria di Edoardo Vineis (Pisa), 345–54Google Scholar

Levens, R. G. C. (ed.) 1946. Cicero: Verrine V. LondonGoogle Scholar

Levin, H. 1970. The Myth of the Golden Age in the Renaissance. LondonGoogle Scholar

Levine, P. 1959. Review of Mynors 1958, American Journal of Philology 80: 415–24Google Scholar

Levine, P. 1976. ‘Catullus c. 68: A new perspective’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 9: 61–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberg, G. 1962. Puella Divina: Die Gestalt der göttlichen Geliebten bei Catull im Zusammenhang der antiken Dichtung. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Lingenberg, W. 2003. Das erste Buch der Heroidenbriefe: Echtheitskritische Untersuchungen. PaderbornGoogle Scholar

Lingenberg, W. (forthcoming). ‘Der Heroidestext in den frühesten Drucken’, HermesGoogle Scholar

Liveley, G., and Salzmann-Mitchell, P. (eds) 2008. Latin Elegy and Narratology. ColumbusGoogle Scholar

Lohse, G. 1967. ‘σύντονος ἀγρυπνίη (zu Kallimachos Epigr. 27, 4)’, Hermes 95: 379–81Google Scholar

Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Loomis, J. W. 1969. ‘M. Furius Bibaculus and Catullus’, Classical World 63: 112–14Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. 2006. ‘Hic and absence in Catullus 68’, Classical Philology 101: 115–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucarini, C. M. 2006. ‘Osservazioni sulle edizioni virgiliane di Vario e di Probo e sull’ origine dell’ “Anecdoton Parisinum”’, Atti della accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche. Rendiconti. ser. IX. vol. 17: 281–305Google Scholar

Luck, G. 1967–77. P. Ovidius Naso Tristia, 2 vols. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Lührs, D. 1992. Untersuchungen zu den Athetesen Aristarchs in der Ilias und zu ihrer Behandlung im Corpus der exegetischen Scholien. Hildesheim, Zürich, and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 2007. Collected Papers on Latin Poetry. OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maas, P. 1956. ‘Korruptelen in Horazens Oden’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 27–8: 227–8Google Scholar

McCall, M. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGowan, M. M. 2009. Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKeown, J. C. 1987, 1989, 1998. Ovid, Amores: Text, Prolegomena and Commentary, vols 1–3. Liverpool and LeedsGoogle Scholar

McKie, D. S. 2009. Essays in the Interpretation of Roman Poetry. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Macleod, C. W. 1974. ‘A use of myth in ancient poetry’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 24: 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamee, K. 1981. ‘Aristarchus and “Everyman’s” Homer’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 22: 247–55Google Scholar

McNamee, K. 1992. Sigla and Select Marginalia in Greek Literary Papyri. BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Maggiali, G. 2008. Il carme 68 di Catullo. CesenaGoogle Scholar

Malloch, S. J. V. (ed.) 2013. The Annals of Tacitus, Book 11. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Latin Etymologies. LeedsGoogle Scholar

Mandel, C. 1988. ‘Golden age and the good works of Sixtus V: Classical and Christian typology in the art of a Counter-Reformation pope’, Storia dell’arte 62: 29–52Google Scholar

Mankin, D. 1988. Review of Borzsák 1984 and Shackleton Bailey 1985, American Journal of Philology 109: 270–4Google Scholar

Mankin, D. 1995. Horace: Epodes. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Manzini, L. (ed.) 1628. Le muse di Bologna tributarie de gl’ Ill.mi Sig.ri Nicolò Barbarigo & Marco Trivisano gli amici. All’Illustriss. Signore Lonardo [sic] Pisani (no place of publication)Google Scholar

Marković, M. (ed.) 1958. Pesme Franja Božičevića Natalisa / Francisci Natalis Carmina. BelgradeGoogle Scholar

Marsilio, M., and Podlesney, K. 2006. ‘Poverty and poetic rivalry in Catullus (C. 23, 13, 16, 24, 81)’, Acta Classica 49: 167–81Google Scholar

Martin, R. 1993. ‘Telemachus and the last hero song’, Colby Review 29: 222–40Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (ed.) 1994. Horace: Epistles Book I. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. (ed.) 2012. Horace: Odes Book I. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Mayor, J. B., Warde Fowler, W., and Conway, R. S. 1907. Virgil’s Messianic Eclogue: Its Meaning, Occasion, and Sources. LondonGoogle Scholar

Mazurek, E. F. 2006. ‘Elegy and epic and the recognition of Paris: Ovid, Heroides 16’, Arethusa 39: 47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendell, C. W. 1957. Tacitus: The Man and his Work. New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar

Merrill, W. 1921. ‘Lucretius and Cicero’s verse’, University of California Publications in Classical Philology 5: 143–54Google Scholar

Michalopoulos, A. N. 2006. Ovid, Heroides 16–17: Introduction, Text and Commentary. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Michiel, P. (no date) Lidio, et Elpino: Ecloga di Pietro Michiele (no place of publication)Google Scholar

Miller, P. N. 2001. ‘Friendship and conversation in seventeenth-century Venice’, Journal of Modern History 73: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minyard, J. D. 1978. Mode and Value in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. BerlinGoogle Scholar

Montanari, F. 1979. Studi di filologia omerica antica, vol. 1. PisaGoogle Scholar

Monteleone, C. 1975. L’egloga quarta da Virgilio a Costantino: Critica del testo e ideologia. ManduriaGoogle Scholar

Morales Folguera, J. M. 2007. Las sibilas en el arte de la Edad Moderna, Europa mediterránea y Nueva España. Málaga and SevilleGoogle Scholar

Morgan, L. 2003. ‘Child’s play: Ovid and his critics’, Journal of Roman Studies 93: 66–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, L. 2007. ‘The moneyer C. Mamilius Limetanus’, Ostraka 16: 195–201Google Scholar

Most, G. 1989. ‘Cornutus and stoic allegoresis’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.3: 2014–65Google Scholar

Most, G. (ed.) 2006. Hesiod. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Mueller, L. 1894. De re metrica poetarum latinorum praeter Plautum et Terentium libri septem. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Mülke, M. 2008. Der Autor und sein Text: Die Verfälschung des Originals im Urteil antiker Autoren. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, G. 1958. ‘Die Problematik des Lucreztextes seit Lachmann: Teil 1’, Philologus 102: 247–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munk Olsen, B. 1982–. L’étude des auteurs classiques latins aux XIe et XIIe siècles. ParisGoogle Scholar

Munro, H. A. J. (ed.) 1864. Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.) 1958. C. Valerii Catulli carmina. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. 1990. Virgil: Georgics. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Nagle, B. R. 1980. The Poetics of Exile: Program and Polemic in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto of Ovid. BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Nappa, C. 2001. Aspects of Catullus’ Social Fiction. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar

Nencini, F. 1895. ‘Emendationum Lucretianarum spicilegium’, Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 3: 205–24Google Scholar

Neudling, C. L. 1955. A Prosopography to Catullus. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Newman, J. K. 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. HildesheimGoogle Scholar

Nickau, K. 1977. Untersuchungen zur textkritischen Methode des Zenodotos von Ephesos. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicodemo, F. 2002. ‘Le presunte interpolazioni nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio’, Vichiana 4a ser. 4.2: 288–312Google Scholar

Nipperdey, K. (ed.) 1915. P. Cornelius Tacitus. Erster Band: Ab excessu divi Augusti I–VI. 11th edn. Ed. G. Andresen. BerlinGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1978. ‘Notes on the text of Catullus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 24: 92–115 = Nisbet 1995: 76–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1980. ‘Sidere clarior (Horace Carm. 3.1.42)’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 5: 151–2Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1986a. Review of Borzsák 1984, Gnomon 58: 611–15Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1986b. Review of Shackleton Bailey 1985, Classical Review N.S. 36: 227–34Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1991. ‘How textual conjectures are made’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’annalisi dei testi classici 26: 65–91 [=Nisbet 1995: 338–61]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. 1995. Collected Papers on Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S. J.. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. 1970. A Commentary on Horace, Odes Book I. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Rudd, N. 2004. A Commentary on Horace, Odes Book III. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Norden, E. 1926. P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI, 3rd edn. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Oakley, S. P. 1997–2005. A Commentary on Livy, Books vi–x. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Oakley, S. P. 2013. ‘Notes on the text of Cicero’s Philippics’, Classical Quarterly 63: 277–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Obbink, D. 1995. ‘How to read poetry about the gods’, in Obbink, D. (ed.), Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace (Oxford), 189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odebrecht, T. 1861. ‘Zur Erinnerung an den märkischen Dichter Valens Acidalius’, Märkische Forschungen 7: 210–16Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. 1996. True Names. Ann ArborGoogle Scholar

Oliensis, E. 2009. Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ottaviano, S. 2014. ‘La tradizione delle opere di Virgilio tra IX e XI sec’.Scuola Normale Superiore. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia. Diploma di Perfezionamento in Discipline letterarie, filologiche e storiche classiche.PisaGoogle Scholar

Page, D. 1960. ‘Richard Porson (1759–1808)’, Proceedings of the British Academy 45: 221–36Google Scholar

Palmer, A. 1879. ‘On Ellis’s Catullus’, Hermathena 3: 293–363Google Scholar

Palmer, A. 1898. P. Ovidii Nasonis Heroides. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Passalacqua, M. 1978. I codici di Prisciano. RomeGoogle Scholar

Pease, A. S. 1955–8. M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Pellegrin, E., et al. 1975–2010. Les manuscrits classiques latins de la bibliothèque Vaticane. ParisGoogle Scholar

Pennisi, G. 1959. ‘Il carme 68 di Catullo’, Emerita 27: 89–109, 213–38Google Scholar

Perrotta, G. 1927. ‘L’elegia di Catullo ad Allio’, Atene e Roma 8: 134–51Google Scholar

Peterson, W. 1906. ‘Last notes on the Verrines’, Classical Review 20: 256–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, W. (ed.) 1917. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, vol. 3: Divinatio in Q. Caecilium, In C. Verrem, 2nd edn. Oxford Classical Texts. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Petoletti, M. 2003. ‘Età dell’oro e profezia nella poesia encomiastica del tardo trecento a Milano: Giovanni De Bonis e le sue lodi viscontee’, in Secchi Tarugi, L. (ed.), Millenarismo ed età dell’oro nel Rinascimento: Atti del XIII Convegno internazionale (Chianciano-Montepulciano-Pienza 16–19 luglio 2001) (Florence), 411–31Google Scholar

Petoletti, M. 2011. ‘Un nuovo manoscritto della biblioteca petrarca: Il più antico codice degli Agrimensores (Wolfenbüttel, Aug. fol. 36 23)’, Studi petrarcheschi 24: 1–28Google Scholar

Pignatti, F. 1996. ‘Feliciano, Felice’, in Dizionario biografico degli Italiani 46: 83–90Google Scholar

Pizzi, G. 1990. Storia degli Amaltei. OderzoGoogle Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. 1990. ‘Two notes on Catullus’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 40: 199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prescott, H. W. 1940. ‘The unity of Catullus LXVIII’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 71: 473–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prümm, K. 1929. ‘Das Prophetenamt der Sibyllen in kirchlicher Literatur, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Deutung der 4. Ekloge Virgils’, Scholastik 4: 54–77, 221–46, 498–533Google Scholar

Pulbrook, M. 1977. ‘The original published form of Ovid’s Heroides’, Hermathena 122: 29–45Google Scholar

Puttfarken, T. 1980. ‘Golden age and justice in sixteenth-century Florentine political thought and imagery: Observations on three pictures by Jacopo Zucchi’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 43: 130–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Questa, C. 1996. ‘Questioni codicologiche’, in Mariotti, S. (ed.), Orazio: Enciclopedia oraziana (3 vols, Rome), 1.329–44Google Scholar

Quint, D. 2001. ‘The brothers of Sarpedon: Patterns of Homeric imitation in Aeneid 10’, Materiali e Discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 47: 33–66Google Scholar

Raby, F. J. E. 1957. A History of Secular Latin Poetry in the Middle Ages, 2 vols. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Ramirez de Verger, A. 2006. ‘A note on Ovid, Heroides 15. 113’, Hermes 134: 123–4Google Scholar

Ramirez de Verger, A. 2007. Review of Michalopoulos 2006, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2007.09.53Google Scholar

Ramirez de Verger, A. 2009. ‘La carta de Safo a Faón de Ovidio (Her. XV)’, Emerita 77: 187–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raubitschek, A. E. 1938. ‘Zu einigen Wiederholungen bei Lukrez’, American Journal of Philology 59: 218–23Google Scholar

Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. LondonGoogle Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1973. ‘Notes on Ovid’s Heroides’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 23: 324–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1974. Review of Dörrie 1971, Classical Review N.S. 24: 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1976. ‘The tradition of Consolatio ad Liviam’, Revue d’Histoire des Textes 6: 79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1980. ‘The Italian tradition of Lucretius’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 23: 27–48Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1983 ‘Manuscripts copied from printed books’, in Trapp, J. B. (ed.), Manuscripts in the Fifty Years after the Invention of Printing (London), 12–20 = Reeve 2011: 175–83Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1989. ‘Eliminatio codicum descriptorum: A methodological problem’, in Grant, J. N. (ed.), Editing Greek and Latin texts (New York), 1–35 = Reeve 2011: 145–74Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 1991. ‘Acidalius on Manilius’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 41: 226–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 2000. ‘Cuius in usum? Recent and future editing’, Journal of Roman Studies 90: 196–206. Republished with additions in Reeve 2011: 339–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 2005. ‘The Italian tradition of Lucretius revisited’, Aevum 79: 115–64Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. 2011. Manuscripts and Methods. RomeGoogle Scholar

Reifferscheid, R. (ed.) 1860. C. Suetoni Tranquilli praeter Caesarum libros reliquiae. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, T. 2004. ‘Readers in the underworld: Lucretius DRN 3.912–1075’, Journal of Roman Studies 94: 27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renehan, R. 1988. ‘Shackleton Bailey and the editing of Latin poetry: A Latin classic’, Classical Philology 83: 311–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. (ed.) 1983. Texts and Transmission. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, L. D., and Wilson, N. G. 2013. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature, 4th edn. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Ribbeck, O. 1866. Prolegomena critica ad P. Vergili Maronis opera maiora. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Richmond, J. A. 2002. ‘Manuscript traditions and the transmission of Ovid’s works’, in Boyd 2002: 443–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritschl, F. 1836. ‘Ueber die Kritik des Plautus’, Rheinisches Museum 4: 153–216, 485–570 = 1868: 1–161Google Scholar

Ritschl, F. 1868. Opuscula philologica, vol. 2: Ad Plautum et grammaticam Latinam spectantia. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Ritschl, F. 1880. Prolegomena de rationibus criticis grammaticis prosodiacis metricis emendationis Plautinae. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Roman, L. 2006. ‘A history of lost tablets’, Classical Antiquity 25: 351–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romanes, N. H. 1935. Further Notes on Lucretius. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Romani, F. 1902. Poesia pagana e arte cristiana. FlorenceGoogle Scholar

Rosand, D. 2001. Myths of Venice: The Figuration of a State. Chapel Hill and LondonGoogle Scholar

Rosati, G. 1989. Ovidio: Lettere di Eroine. MilanGoogle Scholar

Rosati, G. 1990. ‘Note al testo delle Heroides’, Materiali e Discussioni 24: 161–79Google Scholar

Rosati, G. 1996. ‘Sabinus, the Heroides and the Poet-Nightingale: Some observations on the authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 46: 207–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. 1999. ‘Tracing medulla as a locus eroticus’, Arethusa 32: 19–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossi, A. 1915. ‘Le Sibille nelle arti figurative italiane’, L’Arte 18: 209–21, 272–85, 427–58Google Scholar

Royds, T. F. 1918. Virgil and Isaiah: A Study of the Pollio. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Rudd, N. (ed.) 1989. Horace: Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’). CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Ruperti, G. A. (ed.) 1834. C. Cornelii Taciti opera. HanoverGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. A., and Konstan, D. (eds) 2005. Heraclitus: Homeric Problems. AtlantaGoogle Scholar

Sabellico, M. A. 1560. M. Antonii Coccii Sabellici opera omnia. BaselGoogle Scholar

Sambin, P. 1956. ‘La formazione quattrocentesca della biblioteca di S. Giovanni di Verdara in Padova’, Atti dell’ Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere, ed Arte 114: 263–80Google Scholar

Sampieri, T. 1978. ‘La cultura letteraria di Pietro da Eboli’, in Studi su Pietro da Eboli (Rome), 67–87Google Scholar

Sandys, J. E. 1908–21. A History of Classical Scholarship, vol. 1, 3rd edn, vols 2 and 3, 2nd edn. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Sansone, D. 1984. ‘On hendiadys in Greek’, Glotta 62: 16–25Google Scholar

Santoni, A. 2000. Palefato: Storie incredibili. PisaGoogle Scholar

Sarkissian, J. 1983. Catullus 68: An Interpretation. LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schäfer, E. 1966. Das Verhältnis von Erlebnis und Kunstgestalt bei Catull. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar

Scheid, J. 1985. ‘Numa et Jupiter ou les dieux citoyens de Rome’, Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 59: 41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schier, R. 2008. ‘Giorgione’s Tempesta: A Virgilian pastoral’, Renaissance Studies 22: 476–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiesaro, A. 1990. ‘Problemi di formularità lucreziana’, Materiali e Discussioni 24: 47–70Google Scholar

Schmid, W. 1949. ‘Lukrez über die Mächtigen und ihre Ängste’, Symbola Coloniensia Iosepho Kroll … oblata (Cologne), 101–9 = Schmid 1984: 277–85Google Scholar

Schmid, W. 1984. Ausgewählte philologische Schriften. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, V. H. 1819. ‘Ueber den Kritiker Valens Acidalius: Besonders über seinen Antheil an der Schrift eines Ungenannten, daß die Weiber keine Menschen sind’, Journal für Deutschland, historisch-politischen Inhalts 13: 113–48Google Scholar

Schöll, F. 1880. ‘Zu Catull II’, Jahrbücher für klassische Philologie 121: 471–96Google Scholar

Schröder, B.-J. 1999. Titel und Text: Zur Entwicklung lateinischer Gedichtüberschriften. Mit Untersuchungen zu lateinischen Buchtiteln, Inhaltsverzeichnissen und anderen Gliederungsmitteln. Berlin and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schröter, E. 1980. ‘Der Vatikan als Hügel Apollons und der Musen: Kunst und Panegyrik von Nikolaus V. bis Julius II.’, Römische Quartalschrift 75: 208–40Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 1998. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selden, D. L. 1992. ‘Ceveat lector: Catullus and the rhetoric of performance’, in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. L. (eds), Innovations of Antiquity (New York and London), 461–512Google Scholar

Setaioli, A. 1985. ‘Il carme di Catullo a Cicerone: Una messa a punto’, Sileno 11: 211–17Google Scholar

Seyffert, R. 1843. Emendationes Taciteae. Fasciculus primus: Annales. BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1979. ‘On Cicero’s speeches’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83: 237–85Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) 1985. Q. Horati Flacci opera. StuttgartGoogle Scholar

Shipley, F. W. 1904. Certain Sources of Corruption in Latin Manuscripts: A Study Based upon Two Manuscripts of Livy. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar

Siebengartner, A. 2012. ‘Stoically seeing and being seen in Cicero’s Aratea’, in Glucker, J. and Burnett, C. (eds), Greek into Latin from Antiquity until the Nineteenth Century (London and Turin), 97–116Google Scholar

Sighinolfi, L. 1921. ‘La biblioteca di Giovanni Marcanova’, in Collectanea variae doctrinae Leoni S. Olschki (Munich), 187–22Google Scholar

Singleton, D. 1972. ‘A note on Catullus’ first poem’, Classical Philology 67: 192–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sjögren, H. 1906. Zum Gebrauch des Futurums im Altlateinischen. UppsalaGoogle Scholar

Skinner, M. 1972. ‘The unity of Catullus 68: The structure of 68a’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 103: 495–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, M. 2003. Catullus in Verona: A Reading of the Elegiac Libellus, Poems 65–116. ColumbusGoogle Scholar

Skinner, M. 2007a. ‘Authorial arrangement of the collection: Debate past and present’, in Skinner 2007b: 35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, M. (ed.) 2007b. A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Smith, C. 2005. ‘The Origo Gentis Romanae: Facts and fictions’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 48: 97–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, C. 2006. The Roman Clan. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, C. 2010. ‘Caesar and the history of early Rome’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Cesare, precursore o visionario? (Pisa), 249–64Google Scholar

Soubiran, J. 1966. L’Élision dans la poésie latine. ParisGoogle Scholar

Soubiran, J. (ed.) 1972. Cicéron: Aratea, fragments poétiques. ParisGoogle Scholar

Spieß, T.-C. 2012. Die Sabinus-Briefe: Humanistische Fälschung oder antike Literatur? Einleitung – Edition – Übersetzung – Kommentar. TrierGoogle Scholar

Stein, M. 2008. ‘Kritische Zeichen’, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum (Stuttgart) 22: 133–63Google Scholar

Steiner, D. 2004. ‘Catullan excavations: Pindar’s “Olympian” 10 and Catullus 68’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102: 275–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, J. 1996. Palaephatus Περὶ ἀπίστων, On Unbelievable Tales. WaucondaGoogle Scholar

Stinger, C. L. 1998. The Renaissance in Rome, 2nd edn. Bloomington and IndianapolisGoogle Scholar

Stroup, S. C. 2010. Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susemihl, F. and Brieger, A. 1867. ‘Kritisch-exegetische Bemerkungen zum zweiten Buche des Lucretius’, Philologus 25: 67–91Google Scholar

Syme, R. 1978. History in Ovid. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Syndikus, H. P. 1984–90. Catull: Eine Interpretation, vol. 1: Die kleinen Gedichte (1–60), vol. 2: Die grossen Gedichte (61–68), vol. 3: Die Epigramme (69–116). 3 vols. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. 1981. ‘The authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV)’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 133–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. 1983. ‘Ovid: Heroides’, in Reynolds 1983: 268–72Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. 1987. ‘Towards a typology of interpolation in Latin poetry’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 117: 281–98Google Scholar

Tatum, W. J. 1988. ‘Catullus’ criticism of Cicero in poem 49’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 118: 179–84Google Scholar

Tatum, W. J. 1997. ‘Friendship, politics, and literature in Catullus: Poems 1, 65 and 66, 116’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 47: 482–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tenneroni, A. and , M. 1937. Vita di Bartolomeo d’Alviano. TodiGoogle Scholar

Theodorakopoulos, E. 2007. ‘Poem 68: Love and death, and the gifts of Venus and the Muses’, in Skinner 2007b: 314–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (ed.) 2011. Horace: Odes Book IV and Carmen saeculare. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Thomson, D. F. S. 1967. ‘Catullus and Cicero: Poetry and the criticism of poetry’, Classical World 60: 225–30Google Scholar

Thomson, D. F. S. 1997. Catullus Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Toronto, Buffalo and LondonGoogle Scholar

Tilley, A. A. 1918. The Dawn of the French Renaissance. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Timpanaro, S. 1986. Per la storia della filologia virgiliana antica. RomaGoogle Scholar

Timpanaro, S. 1995. Review of R. Badalì, ed., Lucani opera. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 123: 218–21Google Scholar

Tola, E. 2008. ‘Chronological segmentation in Ovid’s Tristia: The implicit narrative of elegy’, in Liveley and Salzmann-Mitchell 2008: 51–67Google Scholar

Tracy, V. A. 1971. ‘The authenticity of Heroides 16–21’ Classical Journal 66: 328–30Google Scholar

Tränkle, H. 1993. ‘Von Keller-Holder zu Shackleton Bailey: Prinzipien und Probleme der Horaz-Edition’, in Ludwig, W. (ed.), Horace: L’oeuvre et les imitations, un siècle d’interprétation, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 39 (Vandoeuvres-Geneva), 1–29Google Scholar

Trappes-Lomax, J. M. 2007. Catullus: A Textual Reappraisal. SwanseaCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuplin, C. J. 1981. ‘Catullus 68’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 31: 113–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turnebus, A. 1580. Adversariorum tomi tres. BaselGoogle Scholar

Turner, E. G. 1987. Greek Manuscripts of the Ancient World, 2nd edn. LondonGoogle Scholar

Ulery, R. W. 1986. ‘Cornelius Tacitus’, in Cranz, F. E. (ed.), Catalogus translationum et commentariorum: Mediaeval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries: Annotated Lists and Guides, vol. 6 (Washington), 88–174Google Scholar

Van Cleve, T. C. 1972. The Emperor Frederick II of Hohenstaufen, Immutator Mundi. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Vandiver, E. 2000. ‘Hot springs, cool rivers, and hidden fires: Heracles in Catullus 68: 51–66’, Classical Philology 95: 151–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Sickle, J. 1981. ‘Poetics of opening and closure in Meleager, Catullus, and Gallus’, Classical World 75: 65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venier, M. 2006. ‘Poesia latina degli Amalteo’, Aevum 80: 687–716Google Scholar

Vermeule, 1979. Aspects of Death in Early Greek Art and Poetry. Berkeley and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vezin, J. 1985. ‘La division en paragraphes dans les manuscrits de la basse antiquité et du haut moyen âge’, in Laufer, R. (ed.), La notion de paragraphe (Paris), 41–51Google Scholar

Vidienus, F. et al. 1503. Francisci Vidieni Panaegyricus Leonardo Lauretano serenissimo principi dictus. VeniceGoogle Scholar

Villa, C. 1992–4. ‘I manoscritti di Orazio’, Aevum 66: 95–135; 67: 55–103; 68: 117–46Google Scholar

Vretska, K. 1966. ‘Das Problem der Einheit von Catull c. 68’, Wiener Studien 79: 313–30Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. 1967. ‘The Scipionic legend’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 13: 54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wälli, S. 2002. Melodien aus mittelalterlichen Horaz-Handschriften. KasselGoogle Scholar

Walsh, P. G. (trans.) 1997. Cicero: The Nature of the Gods. New YorkGoogle Scholar

Walther, G. H. (ed.) 1831–3. C. Cornelii Taciti opera. HalleGoogle Scholar

Watt, W. S. 1988. ‘Tacitea’, American Journal of Philology 109: 351–61Google Scholar

Watt, W. S. 1989. ‘Notes on Ovid, Heroides’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 117: 62–8Google Scholar

Watts, N. H. (trans.) 1931. Cicero, vol. 14: Pro T. Annio Milone, In L. Calpurnium Pisonem, Pro M. Aemilio Scauro, Pro M. Fonteio, Pro C. Rabirio Postumo, Pro M. Marcello, Pro Q. Ligario, Pro rege Deiotaro. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA and LondonGoogle Scholar

Wellesley, K. (ed.) 1986. Cornelii Taciti libri qui supersunt. Tomus I pars secunda: Ab excessu divi Augusti libri XI–XVI. LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Werfer, F. W. 1814. ‘Lectionum in Ovidii Heroidas specimen’, Acta Philologorum Monacensium 1: 495–566Google Scholar

Werner, D. 2012. Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar