Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T02:11:59.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - From Intersubjectivity to International Relations

The Relevance of the “Emotive Turn” of Cognitive Science

from Part I - Towards an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Emotions in International Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Yohan Ariffin
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Jean-Marc Coicaud
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Vesselin Popovski
Affiliation:
United Nations University, Tokyo
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Emotions in International Politics
Beyond Mainstream International Relations
, pp. 80 - 111
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. P. (1963). “Computer Simulation of ‘Hot Cognition’”. In Tomkins, S. S. & Messick, S. (eds.), Computer Simulation of Personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Aquilar, F. and Gallucio, M. (2008). Psychological Processes in International Negociations: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and Personality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Athanasiou, A., Hantzaroula, P., et al., eds. (2008). Towards a New Epistemology: The “ Affective Turn”. Historein: The Cultural and Historical Society. Volume 8.Google Scholar
Clough, P. T. and Halley, J., eds. (2007). The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. (2007). Action Mirroring and Action Understanding: An Alternative Account. In Haggard, P., Rossetti, Y. and Kawatto, M. (eds.), Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition. Attention and Performance XXII. Pp. 435–459. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. and Sutton, S. (1995). “Affective Neuroscience: The Mergence of a Discipline”. Current Biology: Opinion in Neurobiology, 5:217224.Google Scholar
de Sousa, R. (2010). “Emotions”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/.Google Scholar
Flanagan, O. J. (1992). Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2001). “The ‘Shared Manifold’ Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy”. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8:3350.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2003). The Manifold Nature of Interpersonal Relations: The Quest for a Common Mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. March 29; 358 (1431):517–528.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2005). “Being Like Me”: Self-Other Identity, Mirror Neurons and Empathy”. In Perspectives on Imitation – From Neuroscience to Social Science. Volume 1. Hurley, S.L. and Chater, N. (eds.). Pp. 99–117. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998). “Mirror Neurons and the Stimulation Theory of Mind-Reading”. Trends in Cognitive Science 2(12):493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C. and Rizzolatti, G. (2004). “A Unifying View of the Basis of Social Cognition”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(9):396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, H. (1985). The Cognitive Revolution (J. L. Peytavin: Histoire de la révolution cognitive, la nouvelle science de l’esprit, Payot 1993, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. (1998). “Emotions”. In W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Pp. 197203. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacob, P. and Jeanneod, M. (2005). “The Motor Theory of Social Cognition: A Critique”. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(1):21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnshon, G. (2009). “Theories of Emotion”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: www.iep.utm.edu/emotion/.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst (1997). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kirouac, G. (1994). “ Les Emotions”. In Traité de psychologie expérimentale. Richelle, M., Requin, J. and Robert, M., (eds.). Volume 2, pp. 3–39. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
La Caze, M. and Lloyd, H. (2011). “Editors’ Introduction: Philosophy and the ‘Affective Rurn’”. Parrhesia 13:113.Google Scholar
Lane, R. D. and Nadel, L., eds. (2000). Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1968). “Emotions and adaptation: conceptual and empirical relations”. In Arnold, E. D. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation. Pp. 175–266. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Llife. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Lehrer, J. (April 27, 2009). “Hearts & Minds”. Boston Globe.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., et al. (2008). Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, W. (2009). “Emotion Theories and Concepts (Philosophical Perspectives)”. In Sander, D. and Scherer, K. (eds.), Oxford Companion to Emotion and to the Affective Sciences. Pp. 144–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, R. W., et al., eds. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Marie, J.-L. (2008). “Entre débat scientifique et querelle politique: la réception des sciences cognitives par la science politique”. In Dufourt, D. and Michel, J. (eds.), La vie politique de la science. Pp.114–132. Lyon: L’Interdisiplinaire.Google Scholar
Neuman, R. W., Marcus, G. E., et al., eds. (2007). The Affect Effect, Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Panskepp, J. (2003). “At the Interface of the Affective Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences: Decoding the Emotional Feelings of the Brain.” Brain and Cognition (52):414.Google Scholar
Roy, J.-M. (2001). L’émergence de la neuroscience cognitive. Cahiers Alfred Binet (667):9–35.Google Scholar
Roy, J.-M. (2004). “Cognitive Neuroscience and the Unity of the Study of Cognition”. In Larrazabal, J. and Miranda, J. A. (eds.), Language, Knowledge and Representation. Pp. 113–134. Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Schacter, S. and Singer, J. (1962). “Cognitive, Social and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State”, Psychological Review 69:379399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. (2009). “Emotion Theories and Concepts (Psychological Perspectives)”. In Sander, D. and Schere, K. (eds.), Oxford Companion to Emotion and to the Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. and Fridja, Nico (2009). “Emotion Definitions”. In Sander, D. and Scherer, K. (eds.), Oxford Companion to Emotion and to the Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schreiber, D. (2007). “Political Cognition as Social Cognition: Are We All Political Sophisticates?”. In Neuman, R. W., Marcus, G. E., Crigler, A. N. and Mackuen, M. (eds.), The Affect Effect, Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Pp. 48–69. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., et al., eds. (2003). Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seigworth, G. J. and Gregg, M., eds. (2010). The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wicker, B., Keysers, B., Plailly, J., Royet, J.-P., Gallese, V. and Rizzolati, G. (2003). “Both of Us Disgusted My Insula: The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust”. Neuron 40:655664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zajonc, R. (1980). “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences”. American Psychologist 35:151175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×