Abbott, Jason P., and Gregorios-Pippas, Sophie. ‘Islamization in Malaysia: Processes and Dynamics’. Contemporary Politics 16 (2010): 135–151.Google Scholar

Abensour, Miguel. ‘La philosophie politique de Saint-Just’. Annales historiques de la Révolution Française 38 (1964): 24.Google Scholar

Abhayaratne, Anoma. ‘Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction: Lessons from the Malaysian Experience’. FEA working paper no. 2004–13. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Faculty of Economics and Administration, 2004. Available at http://asianscholarship.org/asf/AnnualFellows/download_Fifth/Abhayaratne,%20Anoma-Economic%20Growth%20and%20Poverty%20Reduction.doc.Google Scholar

Abraham, Ann. ‘The Ombudsman as Part of the UK Constitution: A Contested Role?’ Parliamentary Affairs 61 (2008): 206–215.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’. Virginia Law Review 83 (1997): 771–797.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We, the People, Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Adler, Max. Démocratie et conseils ouvriers. French translation. Paris: Maspero, 1967.Google Scholar

Akita, George. Foundations of Constitutional Government in Modern Japan, 1868–1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry, (ed.). Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ali, Chaudhri Muhammad. The Emergence of Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

‘Alliance Memorandum to the Reid Commission’ (Sept. 27, 1956). Reprinted in British Documents on the End of Empire, Series B Vol. 3: Malaya. Part III – The Alliance Route to Independence 1955–1957. Stockwell, A. J. (ed.). London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1995. 307–317.Google Scholar

al-Sanhūri, , ‘Abd al-Razzāq. ‘Wujūb Tanqīh al-Qānūn al-Madanī al-Misrī, wa-alaai ‘Ay Asā Yakūn Hadha al-Tanqīh’. Majallat al-qānūn wa-l-iqtișād 6 (1936): 114–115.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Marx. Translated by Ben Brewster. London: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. ‘Some New World Lessons for the Old World’. University of Chicago Law Review 58 (1991): 483–510.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gavin. ‘Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013): 881–906.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gavin. ‘Beyond Constitutionalism beyond the State’. Journal of Law and Society 39 (2012): 359–383.Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry. New Old World. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar

Anechiarico, Frank, and Jacobs, James B.. The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ansari, Iqbal. ‘Minorities and the Politics of Constitution Making in India’. In Sheth, D. and Mahajan, Gurpreet (eds.), Minority Identities and the Nation-State. Oxford University Press, 1999. 111–123.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. London: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.Google Scholar

Asma, Jahangir, and Jilani, Hina. The Hudood Ordinances: A Divine Sanction? A Research Study of the Hudood Ordinances and Their Effect on the Disadvantaged Sections of Pakistan Society. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications, 2003.Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Edited by Rumble, W.. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Austin, John L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar

Aviation Safety Reporting System [ASRS]. ‘ASRS: The Case for Confidential Incident Reporting Systems’. ASRS Research Papers. No. 60 (2001). Available at http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/docs/rs/60_Case_for_Confidential_Incident_Reporting.pdf.Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá. ‘The Party as Polity, the Communist Party, and the Chinese Constitutional State: A Theory of State-Party Constitutionalism’. Journal of Chinese and Comparative Law 16 (2009): 101–164.Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá. ‘Theocratic Constitutionalism: An Introduction to a New Global Legal Ordering’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16 (2008): 85–172.Google Scholar

Backer, Larry Catá. ‘The Rule of Law, the Chinese Communist Party, and Ideological Campaigns: Sange Daibiao (The “Three Represents”), Socialist Rule of Law, and Modern Chinese Constitutionalism’. Journal of Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 19 (2006): 29–102.Google Scholar

Baginda, Abdul Razak, and Schier, Peter (ed.). Is Malaysia an Islamic State? Secularism and Theocracy – A Study of the Malaysian Constitution. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Strategic Research Centre and Konrad Adenauer Foundation, 2002.Google Scholar

‘Bahasa Malaysia Bibles: The Cabinet’s 10-point Solution’, Aliran, Jan. 25, 2014. Available at http://aliran.com/web-specials/bahasa-malaysia-bibles-10-point-solution/.Google Scholar

Bajpai, Rochana. Debating Difference: Group Rights and Liberal Democracy in India. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael. Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Baker, Ray S. Woodrow Wilson: Life and Letters, Youth, 1856–1890. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Balakrishnan, Gopal. The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso, 2000. 101–115.Google Scholar

Bali, Asli U. ‘Justice under Occupation: Rule of Law and the Ethics of Nation-Building in Iraq’. Yale Journal of International Law 30 (2005): 431–472.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne. La crainte des masses: Politique et philosophie avant et après Marx. Paris: Galilée, 1997.Google Scholar

Balme, Stéphanie, and Dowdle, Michael W. (eds.). Building Constitutionalism in China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

Barbera, Augusto. ‘La prima costituzione italiana: La costituzione di Bologna del 1796’. Clio: rivista trimestrale di studi storici 21 (1998): 218–241.Google Scholar

Bari, Abdul Aziz. Malaysian Constitution: A Critical Introduction. Kuala Lumpur: The Other Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bari, Abdul Aziz. ‘Islam in the Federal Constitution: A Commentary on the Decision of Meor Atiqulrahman’. [2000] 2 MLJ: cxxix–cxlii.Google Scholar

Beatty, David. The Ultimate Rule of Law. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Beaud, Olivier. ‘Reframing a Debate among Americans: Contextualising a Moral Philosophy of Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7 (2009): 53–68.Google Scholar

Beaud, Olivier. La puissance de l’état. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.Google Scholar

Bechor, Guy. The Sanhuri Code, and the Emergence of Modern Arab Civil Law (1932 to 1949). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. German Europe. London: Polity Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Beeson, Mark. ‘Mahathir and the Markets: Globalisation and the Pursuit of Economic Autonomy in Malaysia’. Pacific Affairs 73 (2000): 335–351.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Bendersky, Joseph. ‘Introduction: The Three Types of Juristic Thought in German Historical and Intellectual Context’. In Schmitt, Carl, On the Three Types of Juristic Thought. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1967.Google Scholar

Bernardi, Bruno. La fabrique des concepts. Recherches sur l’invention conceptuelle chez Rousseau. Paris: Champion, 2006.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi. Mahatma and the Poet; Letters and Debates between Gandhi and Tagore, 1915–1941. New Dehli: National Book Trust, 1997.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Chris. European Integration: From Nation-State to Member State. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Chris. From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Biko, Steven Bantu. I Write What I Like. London: Heinemann, 1978.Google Scholar

Bilgrami, Akeel. ‘Gandhi (and Marx)’. In Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014. 122–174.Google Scholar

Binder, Leonard. Religion and Politics in Pakistan. University of California Press, 1961.Google Scholar

bin Shafie, Muhammad Ghazali. Rukunegara: A Testament of Hope. Kuala Lumpur: Creative Entreprise Sdn. Bhd., 1985.Google Scholar

Blyth, Mark. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Philip. The Shield of Achilles. New York: Alfred Knopf, 2002.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. ‘Die verfassunggebende Gewalt des Volkes. Ein Grenzbegriff des Verfassungsrechts’. In Staat, Verfassung, Demokratie: Studien zur Verfassungstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. 2nd ed. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1992. 90–112.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. State, Society, Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law. Oxford: Berg, 1981.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. The Six Bookes of a Commonweale. Translated by R. Knolles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Bodineau, Pierre, and Verpeaux, Michel. Histoire constitutionnelle de la France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2013.Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco. Balancing Constitutional Rights. Cambridge University Press 2013.Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco, and Meuwese, Anne. ‘The Meta-Regulation of Transnational Private Regulation’. Journal of Law and Society 38 (2011): 138–162.Google Scholar

Bonefeld, Werner. ‘Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordo-Liberalism’, New Political Economy 17 (2012): 633–656.Google Scholar

Bonner, Philip. ‘South African Society and Culture, 1910–1948’. In Ross, Robert, Mager, Anne Kelk. and Nasson, Bill (eds.), The Cambridge History of South Africa. Vol. 2, 1885–1994. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 254–318.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H. The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. 2nd ed. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993.Google Scholar

Boulle, L. J. South Africa and the Consociational Option: A Constitutional Analysis. Johannesburg: Juta, 1984.Google Scholar

Boulle, Laurence, Harris, Bede, and Hoexter, Cora. Constitutional and Administrative Law: Basic Principles. Cape Town: Juta, 1989.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark. ‘Public Accountability: A Framework for the Analysis and Assessment of Accountability Arrangements in the Public Domain’. European Law Journal 13 (2007): 447–468.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, Schillemans, Thomas, and T Hart, Paul. ‘Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool’. Public Administration 86 (2008): 225–242.Google Scholar

Braibanti, Ralph. Chief Justice Cornelius of Pakistan: An Analysis with Letters and Speeches. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John. ‘Accountability and Responsibility through Restorative Justice’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 33–51.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John, Braithwaite, Valerie, Cookson, Michael, and Dunn, Leah. Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Breslin, Shaun. ‘The ‘China Model’ and the Global Crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese Mode of Governance?’ International Affairs 87 (2011): 1323–1343.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan. Constitutions in a Non-Constitutional World, Arab Basic Laws and the Prospects for Accountable Government. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bryde, Brun-Otto. ‘The ECJ’s Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence – A Milestone in Transnational Constitutionalism’. In Maduro, Miguel Poiares and Azoulai, Loïc (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010. 119–130.Google Scholar

Budlender, Geoff. ‘Law and Lawlessness in South Africa’. South African Journal on Human Rights 4 (1988): 139–152.Google Scholar

Ngoc Son, Bui. ‘The Introduction of Modern Constitutionalism in East Asian Confucian Context: The Case of Vietnam in the Early Twentieth Century’. National Taiwan University Law Review 7 (2012): 423–463.Google Scholar

Burgio, Alberto. Eguaglianza, interesse, unanimità. La politica di Rousseau. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1989.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France (ed. J.G.A. Pocock). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publising Company, 1987 (originally published in 1790).Google Scholar

Burra, Arudra. ‘The Indian Civil Service and the Raj: 1919–1950’. Unpublished, dated Feb. 11, 2007. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2052658.Google Scholar

Bush, Robin, Fountain, Philip, and Feener, Michael (eds.). Religion and the Politics of Development: Critical Perspectives on Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar

Buti, Marco, and Pench, Lucio R.. ‘Why Do Large Countries Flout the Stability Pact? And What Can Be Done About It?’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (2004): 1025–1032.Google Scholar

Byertz, Kurt (ed.), Solidarity. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig. ‘Constitutional Patriotism and the Public Sphere: Interests, Identity, and Solidarity in the Integration of Europe’. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 18 (2005): 257–280.Google Scholar

Calland, Richard. The Zuma Years. Cape Town: Zebra, 2013.Google Scholar

Carothers, Thomas. ‘The Rule of Law Revival’. Foreign Affairs 77 (2) (Mar.–Apr. 1998): 95–106.Google Scholar

Carré de Malberg, Raymond. La loi expression de la volonté générale. Paris: Sirey, 1931.Google Scholar

Carré de Malberg, Raymond. Contribution à la Théorie générale de l’Etat. Paris: Sirey, 1922.Google Scholar

Casper, Steven. ‘The Legal Framework for Corporate Governance: The Influence of Contract Law on Company Strategies in Germany and the United Stated’. In Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, 2001. 387–416.Google Scholar

Casper, Steven. ‘German Industrial Associations and the Diffusion of Innovative Economic Organization: The Case of JIT Contracting’. WZB Working Paper, FS I 96–306. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum, 1996.Google Scholar

Center for Public Policy Studies [Malaysia]. ‘CPPS Policy Factsheet: National Unity’. www.cpps.org.my/downloads/factsheets/National%20unity%20factsheet.pdf (undated).Google Scholar

Chadwick, Owen. Selwyn College: 1882–1973 A Short History. [Cambridge], 1973. Also available at http://www.sel.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Selwyn-1882–1973.pdf.Google Scholar

Chamberlin, Edward Hastings. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Re-Orientation of the Theory of Value. 8th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. ‘Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy’. Constellations 11 (2004): 153–173.Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. ‘The Emergence of Managerial Capitalism’. The Business History Review 58 (1984): 473–503.Google Scholar

Chang, Williamson B. C., and Araujo, Manuel U.. ‘Interpreters for the Defense: Due Process for the Non-English-Speaking Defendant’. California Law Review 63 (1975): 801–823.Google Scholar

Chanock, Martin. The Making of South African Legal Culture 1902–1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Chêne, Marie. ‘Anti-Corruption Clauses in Constitutions’. Berlin: Transparency International, 2013. Available at http://www.transparency.org/files/content/corruptionqas/Anti-corruption_constitutional_clauses_2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Chin, James, and Huat, Wang Chin. “Malaysia’s Electoral Upheaval’. Journal of Democracy 20. 3 (2009): 71–85.Google Scholar

Chong, Debra. ‘Interfaith Panel Back in Saddle Next Month, Says New Chief’. The Malaysian Insider, Oct. 17, 2011, www.themalaysianinsider.com/mobile/malaysia/article/interfaith-panel-back-in-saddle-next-month-says-new-chief/.Google Scholar

Choudhury, G. W. Documents and Speeches on the Constitution of Pakistan. Dhaka: Green Book House, 1967.Google Scholar

Christodoulidis, Emilios. ‘The European Court of Justice and “Total Market” Thinking’. German Law Journal 14 (2013): 2005–2020.Google Scholar

Cohen, Antonin. ‘Constitutionalism without Constitution: Transnational Elites between Mobilisation and Legal Expertise in the Making of a Constitution for Europe (1940s–1960s)’. Law and Social Enquiry 32 (2007): 109–135.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ellie. ‘The Euro, Economic Federalism, and National Sovereignty’. In Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 260–286.Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen. The Idea of Pakistan. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Colby, Thomas, and Smith, Peter J.. ‘The Return of Lochner’. Cornell Law Review 100 (2015): 527–602.Google Scholar

Colletti, Lucio. ‘Introduction’. In Marx, Karl, Early Writings. London: Penguin, 1975. 7–56.Google Scholar

Colletti, Lucio. From Rousseau to Lenin. London: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar

Collins, Richard B. ‘Economic Union as a Constitutional Value’. New York University Law Review 63 (1988): 43–129.Google Scholar

Colonial Office [Great Britain], Constitutional Proposals for the Federation of Malaya. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1957.Google Scholar

Colonial Office [Great Britain]. Report of the Federation of Malaya Constitutional Commission 1957. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1957. Available at http://www.slideshare.net/mbl2020/the-reid-commission-report-1957.Google Scholar

Colonial Office [Great Britain]. Report of the Federation of Malaya Constitutional Conference Held in London in January and February, 1956. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1956. Available at http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-129-79-cp-56-47-47.pdf.Google Scholar

Colón-Ríos, Joel I. Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Constituent Assembly Debates: Official Report. New Dehli: Lok Sabha Secretariat, 1999.Google Scholar

Corder, Hugh. ‘“Building a Nation”: The Judicial Role in South Africa’. Law in Context 28 (2012): 60–75.Google Scholar

Corder, Hugh. ‘Towards a South African Constitution’. Modern Law Review 57 (1994): 491–533.Google Scholar

Corder, Hugh. Judges At Work: The Role and Attitudes of the South African Appellate Judiciary, 1910–1950. Claremont, SA: Juta and Co., 1984.Google Scholar

Corder, Hugh. ‘The Right of Africans to Remain in Urban Areas’. Responsa Meridiana (1977): 213–227.Google Scholar

Corder, Hugh, and Brickhill, Jason. ‘The Constitutional Court’. In Hoexter, Cora and Olivier, Morne (eds.), The Judiciary in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta, 2014. 355–402.Google Scholar

Cornelius, A. R. Law and Judiciary in Pakistan. Edited by Haider, S. M.. Lahore: Lahore Law Times Publications, 1981.Google Scholar

Coupland, Reginald. Report on the Constitutional Problem in India: The Indian Problem, 1833–1935. Oxford University Press, 1943.Google Scholar

Courville, Sasha. ‘Understanding NGO-Based Social and Environmental Regulatory Systems: Why We Need New Models of Accountability’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 271–300.Google Scholar

Cranston, Maurice. John Locke: A Biography. London: Longmans, 1957.Google Scholar

Cristi, Renato. Carl Schmitt and Authoritarian Liberalism. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Crotty, James. ‘Core Industries, Coercive Competition and the Structural Contradiction of Global Neoliberalism’. In Phelps, Nicholas and Raines, Philip (eds.), The New Competition for Inward Investment: Companies, Institutions and Territorial Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003. 9–38.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre. ‘The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’. Common Market Law Review 30 (1993): 17–69.Google Scholar

Czapracka, Katarzyna. Intellectual Property and the Limits of Antitrust: A Comparative Study of US and EU Approaches. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009.Google Scholar

Jietao, Dai. ‘The Constitutional Meaning of Wukan Event’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Series] 3–4 (2012): 505–509.Google Scholar

Daintith, Terence. ‘Regulation’. In Buxbaum, Richard and Mádl, Ferenc (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. 17. Tubingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck, 1997, ch. 10.Google Scholar

Daintith, Terence. ‘The Techniques of Government’. In Jowell, Jeffrey and Oliver, Dawn (eds.), The Changing Constitution. Oxford University Press, 1994. 212–213.Google Scholar

Daly, Eoin. ‘Austerity and Stability in Rousseau’s Constitutionalism’. Jurisprudence 5 (2013): 191–192.Google Scholar

Das, Cyrus. ‘The May 13th Riots and Emergency Rule’. In Harding, Andrew and Lee, H. P. (eds.), Constitutional Landmarks in Malaysia: The First 50 Years, 1957–2007. Singapore: LexisNexis, 2007. 103–114Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 2001.Google Scholar

Davidson, Kenneth M. ‘Creating Effective Competition Institutions: Ideas for Transitional Economies’. Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 6 (2005): 71–129.Google Scholar

Davis, Dennis M., and Klare, Karl. ‘Transformative Constitutionalism and the Common and Customary Law’. South African Journal on Human Rights 26 (2010): 403–509.Google Scholar

Dawson, Mark, and De Witte, Floris. ‘Constitutional Balance after the Euro-Crisis’. Modern Law Review 76 (2013): 817–844.Google Scholar

della Volpe, Galvano. Rousseau and Marx, and Other Writings. Translated by John Fraser. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1978.Google Scholar

DeLong, J. Bradford, and Summers, Lawrence H.. ‘The “New Economy”: Background, Historical Perspective, Questions, and Speculations’. Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City) 29.4 (2001): 33–34Google Scholar

Dent, Nicholas. A Rousseau Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Derathé, Robert. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. ‘Declarations of Independence’. New Political Science 15 (1986): 7–15.Google Scholar

Desika Char, S. V. (ed.). Readings in the Constitutional History of India 1757–1947. Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Devereux, Robert. The First Ottoman Constitutional Period: A Study of the Midhat Constitution and Parliament. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt Publishing, 1927.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. (eds.). Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Dhareshwar, Vivek. ‘Politics, Experience and Cognitive Enslavement: Gandhi’s Hind Swaraj’. Economic and Political Weekly 45 (2010): 51–58.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. Edited by VandeWetering, Richard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th ed. (ed., Wade, E. C. S.). London: Macmillan, 1982.Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael C., and Sabel, Charles F.. ‘A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism’. Columbia Law Review 98 (1998): 267–473.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Bentham Li. High School Star. Edited by Li, Jing and Dowdle, M.. In press.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘China’s Present as the World’s Future: China and “Rule of Law” in a Post-Fordist World’. In Jenco, Leigh K. (ed.), Chinese Thought as Global Theory: Diversifying Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences and Humanities. New York: SUNY Press, 2016. 207–230.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘On the Public-Law Character of Competition Law: A Lesson from Asian Capitalism’. Fordham International Law Journal 38 (2015): 301–386.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘The Peripheral Regulatory State’. In Dubash, Navroz K. and Morgan, Bronwen (eds.), The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies. Oxford University Press, 2013. 209–224.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Constitutional Listening’. Chicago-Kent Law Review 88 (2012): 115–155.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Popular Constitutionalism and the Constitutional Meaning of Charter 08’. In Béja, Jean-Philippe, Hualing, Fu, and Pils, Eva (eds.), Liu Xiaobo, Charter 08, and the Challenges of Political Reform in China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2012. 205–228.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Of Comparative Constitutional Monocropping: A Reply to Qianfan Zhang’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2010): 977–984.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Public Accountability in Alien Terrain: Exploring for Constitutional Accountability in the People’s Republic of China’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 332–333.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Public Accountability: Conceptual, Historical, and Epistemic Mappings’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 1–32.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.). Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Of “Socialism” and “Socialist” Legal Transformations in China and Vietnam’. In Gillespie, John and Nicholson, Pip (eds.), Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2005. 21–44.Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. ‘Of Parliaments, Pragmatism and the Dyanamics of Constitutional Development: The Curious Case of China’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 35 (2002): 1–200.Google Scholar

Drewry, Gavin. ‘Public-Private Partnerships: Rethinking the Boundary between Public and Private Law’. In Osborne, Stephen (ed.), Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective. London: Routledge, 2000. 57–69.Google Scholar

Dugard, John. Human Rights and the South African Legal Order. Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dullien, Steph, and Guérot, Ulrike. ‘The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany’s Approach to the Euro-crisis’. European Council of Foreign Relations Policy Brief. London: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2012. Available at http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR49_GERMANY_BRIEF.pdf.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. ‘Situating Democratic Political Accountability’. In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge University Press, 1999. 329–344.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. Montesquieu and Rousseau: Forerunners of Sociology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. ‘What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981): 185–246.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. ‘What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981): 283–345.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Constitutionalism in an Old Key: Legality and Constituent Power’. Global Constitutionalism 1 (2012): 233.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Question of Constituent Power’. In Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford University Press, 2007. 129–145.Google Scholar

East India (advisory and legislative councils, &c.), vol. 1: Proposals of the Government of India and despatch of the Secretary of State : in continuation of Cd. 3710 of 1907. London: House of Commons, 2008.Google Scholar

Ebrahim, Hassen. The Soul of a Nation: Constitution-Making in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ehrard, Jean. L’idée de nature en France dans la 1e moitié du XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Flammarion, 1963.Google Scholar

Eichengreen, Barry. The European Economy since 1945: Co-ordinated Capitalism and Beyond. Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette, and Verdier, Daniel. ‘European Integration as a Solution to War’, European Journal of International Relations 11 (2005): 99–135.Google Scholar

Eisenmann, Charles. ‘L’Esprit des lois et la separation des pouvoirs’. In Mélanges R. Carré de Malberg. Paris: Duchemin, 1933. 165–192.Google Scholar

Elhauge, Einer, and Geradin, Damien. Global Competition Law and Economics. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

Ellenburg, Stephen. ‘Rousseau and Kant: Principles of Political Right’. In Leigh, Ralph (ed.), Rousseau after Two Hundred Years. Cambridge University Press, 1982. 3–22.Google Scholar

Ellmann, Stephen. In a Time of Trouble: Law and Liberty in South Africa’s State of Emergency. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraint. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. ‘Strategic Uses of Argument’. In Arrow, Kenneth J., Mnookin, Robert H., Ross, Lee, Tversky, Amos, and Wilson, Robert B. (eds.), Barriers to Conflict Resolution. New York: W. W. Norton, 1995. 236–258.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, and Slagstaad, Rune (eds.). Constitutionalism and Democracy: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. ‘Foreword: Unconstitutional Conditions, State Power, and the Limits of Consent’. Harvard Law Review 102 (1988): 4–104.Google Scholar

Esposito, John L. Islam and Politics. 4th ed. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Etherington, Norman, Harries, Patrick, and Mbenga, Bernard K.. ‘From Colonial Hegemonies to Imperial Conquest, 1840–1880’. The Cambridge History of South Africa, Vol. 1, From Early Times to 1885. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 319–391.Google Scholar

Eule, Julian N. ‘Laying the Dormant Commerce Clause to Rest’. Yale Law Journal 91 (1982): 425–485.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter. ‘Collective Capabilities, Culture, and Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom’. Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (2002): 54–60.Google Scholar

Fabio, Udo di. ‘Karlsruhe Makes a Referral’. German Law Journal 15 (2014): 107–110.Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel A. ‘Another View of the Quagmire: Unconstitutional Conditions and Contract Theory’. Florida State University Law Review 33 (2005): 913–952.Google Scholar

Farrand, Max. The Fathers of the Constitution: A Chronicle of the Establishment of the Union. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Facey, Brian A., and Assaf, Dany H.. ‘Monopolization and Abuse of Dominance in Canada, the United States, and the European Union: A Survey’. Antitrust Law Journal 70 (2002): 513–591.Google Scholar

Fauvarque-Cosson, Bénédicte, and Kerhuel, Anne-Julie. ‘Is Law an Economic Contest? French Reactions to the Doing Business World Bank Reports and Economic Analysis of the Law’. American Journal of Comparative Law 57 (2009): 811–830.Google Scholar

Feldman, Noah. ‘Imposed Constitutionalism’. Connecticut Law Review 37 (2005): 857–889.Google Scholar

Fernando, Joseph M. ‘Sir Ivor Jennings and the Malayan Constitution’. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 34 (2006): 577–597.Google Scholar

Fernando, Joseph M. ‘The Position of Islam in the Constitution of Malaysia’. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 37 (2006): 249–266.Google Scholar

Fetscher, Iring. Rousseaus Politische Philosophie. Berlin: Neuwied, 1960.Google Scholar

Fioravanti, Marco. ‘Aspetti del costituzionalismo giacobino. La funzione legislativa nell’acte constitutionnel del 24 giugno 1793’. Historia del costitucionalismo 8 (2007): 123–142.Google Scholar

Fioravanti, Maurizio. Costituzionalismo. Bari, Italy: Laterza, 2009.Google Scholar

Fireside, Harvey. ‘The Concept of the Legislator in Rousseau’s Social Contract’. The Review of Politics 82 (1970): 191–216.Google Scholar

Fischer, Joscka. ‘From Confederacy to Federation: Thoughts on the Finality of European Integration’. In Mény, Yves, Joerges, Christian, and Weiler, Joseph (eds.), What Kind of Constitution for What Kind of Polity: Responses to Joschka Fischer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School, 2001. 19–31.Google Scholar

Foerster, Heinz von. Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. New York: Springer, 2003.Google Scholar

Foerster, Heinz von. Observing Systems. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications, 1981.Google Scholar

Forsyth, Christopher. In Danger for Their Talents: A Study of the Record of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa 1950–1980. Cape Town: Juta, 1985.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.Google Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M. ‘US and EU Competition Law: A Comparison’. In David Richardson, J. and Graham, Edward M. (eds.), Global Competition Policy. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 1997. 339–354.Google Scholar

Frank, Jason. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Postrevolutionary America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Günter. ‘Constitutional Transfer: The IKEA Theory Revisited’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2010): 563–579.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Günter. ‘Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals and Ideologies – Towards a Layered Narrative’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 4 (2006): 439–459.Google Scholar

Fraser, John. An Introduction to the Thought of Galvano della Volpe. London: Lawrence and Wilshart, 1977.Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody. ‘Extending Public Accountability through Privatization: From Public Law to “Publicization”’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 83–114.Google Scholar

French, Rebecca. The Golden Yoke: The Legal Cosmology of Buddhist Tibet. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Friden, Birtel. Rousseau’s Economic Philosophy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1998.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Friedmann, Yohanan. Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and Its Medieval Background. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl J. ‘The Political Thought of Neo-liberalism’. American Political Science Review 49 (1955): 509–525.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1992.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon. ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law – a Reply to Professor Hart’. Harvard Law Review 71 (1958): 630–672.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Furet, Francois. Interpreting the French Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc. ‘Hinduism, Secularism, and the Indian Judiciary’. In Bhargava, Rajeev (ed.), Secularism and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, 1999. 233–267.Google Scholar

Gallie, Walter B. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956): 167–198.Google Scholar

Gandhi, M. K. Hind Swaraj and Other Writings. Edited by Parel, Anthony. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Mahatma. Hindu Dharma. New Delhi: Orient Paperbacks, 1978.Google Scholar

Fang, Gao. ‘Party-dominated Constitutionalism Is Not the Essence of Constitutionalism’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 3–4 (2012): 627–633.Google Scholar

Gardner, John. ‘The Mark of Responsibility (with a Postscript on Accountability)’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 220–242.Google Scholar

Gauchet, Marcel. La Révolution des droits de l’homme. Paris: Gallimard, 1995.Google Scholar

Gazley, Beth. ‘Beyond the Contract: The Scope and Nature of Informal Government–Nonprofit Partnerships’. Public Administration Review 68 (2008): 141–154.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Geng, Guojie. ‘The Transformation of the Party and the Reconstruction of China’s Governance Model’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 3–4 (2012): 438–460.Google Scholar

Genovese, Michael A. The Watergate Crisis. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999.Google Scholar

Gerber, David J. Global Competition: Law, Markets, and Globalization. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Gerber, David J. ‘Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-liberalism, Competition Law and the ‘New’ Europe’. American Journal of Comparative Law 42 (1998): 25–84.Google Scholar

Gill, David. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar

Gilmour, Robert S., and Jensen, Laura S.. ‘Reinventing Government Accountability: Public Functions, Privatization, and the Meaning of “State Action”’. Public Administration Review 58 (1998): 247–257.Google Scholar

Gilson, Ronald J., and Milhaupt, Curtis J.. ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds and Corporate Governance: A Minimalist Response to the New Mercantilism’. Stanford Law Review 60 (2007): 1349–1350.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, (ed.). Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, and Simpser, Alberto (eds.). Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, Elkinsy, Zach, and Meltonz, James. ‘The Lifespan of Written Constitutions’. Paper no. 33. Presented at the 17th American Law and Economics Association Annual Meeting 2007 (New York: Columbia Law School, May 16–17, 2008. Available at http://law.bepress.com/alea/17th/art33.Google Scholar

Glasman, Maurice. Unnecessary Suffering. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar

Glencross, Andrew, and Trechsel, Alexander H. (eds.). EU Federalism and Constitutionalism: The Legacy of Altiero Spinelli. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann. ‘Rights in Twentieth-Century Constitutions: The Case of Welfare Rights’. Journal of Policy History 6 (1994): 140–156.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann. ‘Rights in Twentieth-Century Constitutions’. University of Chicago Law Review 59 (1992): 519–538.Google Scholar

Glyn, Andrew. Capitalism Unleashed: Finance Globalisation and Welfare. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Godley, Wynn. ‘Maastricht and All That’. London Review of Books 14 (1992): 3–4.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, Victor. Anthropologie et politique. Les principes du système de Rousseau. Paris: Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., Headey, Bruce, Muffels, Ruud, and Dirven, Kenk-Jan. The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Graham, Cosmo, and Smith, Fiona (eds.). Competition, Regulation and the New Economy. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

Griffith, John A. G. ‘The Political Constitution’. The Modern Law Review 42 (1979): 1–21.Google Scholar

Grossman, Brian R., Solway, Erica, Hollister, Brooke A., Estes, Carroll L., and Rogne, Leah. ‘One Nation, Interdependent: Exploring the Boundaries of Citizenship in the History of Social Security and Medicare’. In Rogne, Leah, Estes, Carroll L., Grossman, Brian R., Hollister, Brooke A., and Solway, Erica (eds.), Social Insurance and Social Justice: Social Security, Medicare, and the Campaign Against Entitlements. New York: Springer, 2009. 115–148.Google Scholar

Daohui, Guo. ‘The Constitutionality of Social Management and Socialization’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 3–4 (2012): 462–466.Google Scholar

Daohui, Guo. ‘An Outline of Constitutional Socialism’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 2 (2011): 453–459.Google Scholar

Daohui, Guo. ‘Realizing Historical Change from Revolutionary Party to Constitutional Party’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 2 (2011): 169–170.Google Scholar

Daohui, Guo. ‘Authority, Power, or Rights? A Legal Reflection on the Relationship between the Party and People’s Congress’. Legal Studies [Fa Xue] No. 1 (1994): 3–11.Google Scholar

Gurung, D. B., Bharadwaj, Narad, Neupane, Khagendra, and Acharya, Aparajita. Towards a Federalized Democratic Nepal. Kathmandu: Friends for Peace Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. London: Polity, 2012.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, and Derrida, Jacques. ‘February 15th or What Binds European Together?’ Constellations 10 (2003): 291–297.Google Scholar

Hacka, Karl. ‘The Malayan Emergency as Counter-Insurgency Paradigm’. Journal of Strategic Studies 32 (2009): 383–414.Google Scholar

Hahlo, H. R., and Kahn, Ellison. The Union of South Africa: The Development of Its Laws and Constitution. London: Stevens, 1960.Google Scholar

Haider, S. M. ‘Preface’. In Cornelius, A. R., Law and Judiciary in Pakistan. Edited by Haider, S. M. Lahore: Lahore Law Times Publications, 1981. 1–45.Google Scholar

Hairi, Abdul-Hadi. ‘European and Asian Influences on the Persian Revolution of 1906’. Asian Affairs 6 (1975): 155–164.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David (eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L., and Wayman, Frank W.. ‘Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees’. American Political Science Review 84 (1990): 797–820.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander. ‘Federalist No. 1’. In Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John, The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, Clinton. New York: Signet Classics, 2003. 27–31.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Carolyn, Mbenga, Bernard K., and Ross, Robert (eds.). The Cambridge History of South Africa. Vol. 1, From Early Times to 1885. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hamon, Francis, and Troper, Michel. Droit constitutionnel. Paris: LGDJ, 2003.Google Scholar

Hampson, Norman. Saint-Just. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew J. The Constitution of Malaysia: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew J. ‘Constitutionalism, Islam and National Identity in Malaysia’. In Grote, Rainer and Röder, Tilmann (eds.), Constitutionalism in Islamic Countries: Between Upheaval and Continuity. Oxford University Press, 2012. 201–219.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew. ‘Malaysia: Religious Pluralism and the Constitution in a Contested Polity’. Middle East Law and Governance 4 (2012): 356–385.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew. ‘The Rukunegara Amendments of 1971’. In Harding, Andrew and Lee, H. P. (eds.), Constitutional Landmarks in Malaysia: The First 50 Years, 1957–2007. Singapore: LexisNexis, 2007. 115–134.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew. ‘The Keris, the Crescent and the Blind Goddess: The State, Islam and the Constitution in Malaysia’. Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 6 (2002): 154–180.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew. Law, Government and the Constitution in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Law Journal Sdn. Bhd., 1996.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew J., and Lee, H. P. (eds.). Constitutional Landmarks in Malaysia: The First 50 Years, 1957–2007. Singapore: LexisNexis, 2007.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew, and Whiting, Amanda. ‘“Custodians of Civil Liberties and Justice in Malaysia”: The Malaysian Bar and the Moderate State’. In Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M. (eds.), Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 247–304.Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew. The Constitution of Malaysia: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Harrington, Christine B., and Umut Turem, Z.. ‘Accounting for Accountability in Neoliberal Regulatory Regimes’. In Dowdle, Michael W., (ed.), Public Accountability, Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 195–219.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar

Harter, Philip J. ‘Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise’. Georgetown Law Journal 71 (1986): 2–113.Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice. Précis de Droit Constitutionnel. 2nd ed. Paris: Sirey, 1929.Google Scholar

Hausner, Karl Heinz, and Simon, Silvia. ‘Experiences with Budget Rules in Switzerland and Germany’. Intereconomics 50 (2015): 99–107.Google Scholar

He, Baogang. ‘Constitutionalism and Transcending the Competition between the Left and the Right’. Jinyang Journal [Jingyang Xuekan] 4 (2010): 21–24.Google Scholar

He, Baogang. ‘Intra-Party Democracy: A Revisionist Perspective from Below’. In Broedsgaard, Kjeld Erik and Zheng, Yongnian (eds.), The Chinese Communist Party in Reform. London: Routledge, 2006. 192–209.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Hegel: Political Writings. Edited by Kickey, Laurence and Nisbet, H. B., translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Held, David, McGrew, Anthony G., Goldblatt, David, and Perraton, Jonathan. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Helleiner, Eric. ‘Economic Nationalism as a Challenge to Economic Liberalism? Lessons from the 19th Century’. International Studies Quarterly 46 (2002): 307–329.Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann. ‘Authoritarian Liberalism?’ European Law Journal 21 (2015): 295–301 (translated by S. Paulson).Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann. ‘Political Democracy and Social Homogeneity’. In Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard (eds.), Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. New ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. 256–264.Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann. ‘The Nature and Structure of the State’. Cardozo Law Review 18 (1996): 1139–1216. Translated by David Dyzenhaus.Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann. Gesammelte Schriften. Leiden, The Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff, 1971.Google Scholar

Heller, Hermann. ‘Autoritärer Liberalismus’, Die Neue Rundschau 44 (1933): 289–298.Google Scholar

Hemert, Dianne van. Patterns of Cross-Cultural Differences in Psychology: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Dutch University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. Foreign Affairs and the United States Constitution. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. ‘A New Birth of Constitutionalism: Genetic Influences and Genetic Defects’. In Rosenfeld, Michel (ed.), Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference, and Legitimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994. 39–53.Google Scholar

Hepple, Bob. Young Man with a Red Tie. Johannesburg: Jacana, 2013.Google Scholar

Hervey, Tamara. ‘Social Solidarity: A Buttress against Internal Market Law?’ In Shaw, Jo (ed.), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000. 31–48.Google Scholar

Heyningen, Elizabeth van. The Concentration Camps of the Anglo-Boer War: A Social History. Johannesburg: Jacana, 2013.Google Scholar

Hickling, R. H. ‘An Overview of Constitutional Change in Malaysia: 1957–1977’. In Suffian, Tun Mahamed, Lee, H. P., and Trindade, F. A. (eds.), The Constitution of Malaysia: Its Development, 1957–1977. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1978. 1–26.Google Scholar

Hill, Clanspeter, and Menzel, Jors (eds.). Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia. Vol. 2, Reports on National Constitutions. Singapore: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung and Time Edge Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar

Hill, Enid. ‘Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Law: The Place and Significance of Islamic Law in the Life and Work of ‘Abd al-Razzaq Ahmad al-Sanhuri, Egyptian Jurist and Scholar, 1895–1971’ [Part I]. Arab Law Quarterly 3 (1988): 33–64.Google Scholar

Hill, Enid. ‘Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Law: The Place and Significance of Islamic Law in the Life and Work of’Abd al-Razzaq Ahmad al-Sanhuri, Egyptian Jurist and Scholar, 1895–1971’ [Part II]. Arab Law Quarterly 3 (1988): 182–218.Google Scholar

Hodge, Graeme A. ‘Tendering and Contracting Out: Rhetoric or Reality?’ Public Productivity and Management Review 22 (1999): 455–469.Google Scholar

Hodge, Graeme A., and Greve, Carsten. ‘Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review’. Public Administration Review 67 (2007): 545–558.Google Scholar

Hogan, Joyce, and Quigley, Ann M.. ‘Physical Standards for Employment and the Courts’. American Psychologist 41 (1986): 1193–1217.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Honohan, Iseult. Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Asher. Rousseau, Nature and History. University of Toronto Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Morton. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Morton J. ‘The History of the Public/Private Distinction’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130 (1982): 1423–1428.Google Scholar

Hou, Ruili. ‘Rule of Law Takes Center Stage’. China Today, Nov. 11, 2014. At 4. Available at http://epaper.chinadailyasia.com/asia-weekly/article-3509.html.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Mark S. W. Mixed Courts of Egypt. London: Graham and Trotman, 1991.Google Scholar

Deping, Hu. ‘Study the Urgently Needed Big Topic in Our Time’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 3–4 (2012): 1–4.Google Scholar

Bingxiao, Hua. ‘Local Governance and the Grassroots of Constitutional Socialism’, Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Series] 3–4 (2012): 476–485.Google Scholar

Binxiao, Hua. ‘On the Constructive Reform Path of Constitutional Socialism’. Paper presented at the 2011 China’s Reform Summit: Present and Future (Beijing, 2011).Google Scholar

Binxiao, Hua. Zhuyi, Chaoyue Ziyou: Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi de Sixiang Yanshuo [Beyond Liberalism: A Discourse on Constitutionalism]. Xian: Northwest University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. ‘Integration of the Human Rights of Women and the Gender Perspective: Violence against Women and “Honor” Crimes, Intervention before the 57th Session of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights’, Apr. 6, 2001. Available at http://www.hrw.org/news/2001/04/05/item-12-integration-human-rights-women-and-gender-perspective-violence-against-women.Google Scholar

Hunt, Roland, and Harrison, John. The District Officer in India 1937–47. London: Scolar Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Hussain, Jamila. ‘Freedom of Religion in Malaysia: The Muslim Perspective’. In Aun, Wu Min (ed.), Public Law in Contemporary Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Longman Malaysia, 1999. 107–133.Google Scholar

Hussain, Jamila. ‘“Illogical” That 250,000 Muslims Have Left Faith, Says Perlis Mufti’. The Malaysian Insider, Oct. 18, 2011. http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/illogical-that-250000-muslims-have-left-faith-says-perlis-mufti.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, and Oyserman, Daphna. ‘Individualism, Autonomy and Self-Expression: The Human Development Syndrome’. In Vinken, Henk, Soeters, Joseph, and Ester, Peter (eds.), Comparing Cultures, Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2004. 74–96.Google Scholar

Jackson, Sherman A. Islamic Law and the State: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Shihāb Al-Dīn Al-Qarāfī. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Francis. Sovereignty of Law: The European Way. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

James, Harold. ‘Economic Reasons for the Collapse of the Weimar Republic’. In Kershaw, Ian (ed.), Weimar: Why Did German Democracy Fail? New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990. 30–57.Google Scholar

Jayasuriya, Kanishka. ‘Globalisation, Sovereignty and the Rule of Law: From Political to Economic Constitutionalism’. Constellations 8 (2001): 442–460.Google Scholar

Jayasuriya, Kanishka. ‘Introduction: A Framework for the Analysis of Legal Institutions in East Asia’. In Jayasuriya, Kanishka (ed.), Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions. London: Routledge, 1999. 1–23.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. Notes on the State of Virginia. New York: Digireads.com Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

Jenco, Leigh K. Making the Political: Founding and Action in the Political Theory of Zhang Shizhao. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob, and Sum, Ngai-Ling. Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in Their Place. Cheltanham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2006.Google Scholar

Haisong, Jiang, and Dan, Su. ‘The Unique Features of the Rule of Law in Hunan’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 3–4 (2012): 495–504.Google Scholar

Qing, Jiang. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Edited by Bell, Daniel A. and Fan, Ruiping, translated by Edmund Ryden. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Ping, Jiang. ‘On Constitutional Socialism’. Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 1 (2011): 3–6.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian. ‘Europe’s Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation’. ZenTra Working Paper in Transnational Studies No. 06/2012. Oldenberg and Bremen: ZenTra Centre for Transnational Studies, 2012. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2179595.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian. ‘What Is Left of the European Economic Constitution?’ European University Institute Working Papers Law 2004/13. Florence, Italy; European University Institute, 2004. Available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/2828/law04-13.pdf.Google Scholar

Johansen, Baber. Contingency in a Sacred Law: Legal and Ethical Norms in the Muslim Fiqh. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

John, Mathew. ‘Identity and the Social Revolution: On the Political Sociology of Constitutionalism in Contemporary India’. Jawaharlal Nehru University Centre for the Study of Law and Governance Working Paper No. CSLG/WP/18. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University 2012. Available at http://www.jnu.ac.in/cslg/workingPaper/18-Identity%20%28John%29.pdf.Google Scholar

Jomo, K. S., and Chang Yii, Tan. ‘The Political Economy of Post-Colonial Transformation’. In Jomo, K. S. and Wong Sau, Ngan (eds.), Law, Institutions and Malaysian Economic Development. Singapore: NUS Press. 22–53.Google Scholar

Juanjan, Olivier. ‘La suspension de la constitution de 1793. Droits 10 (1993): 125–138.Google Scholar

Judt, Tony. Ill Fares the Land. London: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert A. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul. Political Theology: Four New Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kamman, Michael. A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Edward. The Bank of the United States and the American Economy. Westwood, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis, and Shavell, Steven. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Karis, Thomas, and Carter, Gwendolyn M (eds.). From Protest to Challenge: A Documentary History of African Politics in South Africa 1882–1990. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press (Vols. 1–5); Capetown: University of South Africa Press (Vols. 5–7), 1971–1997.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Translated by B. L. Paulson and S. L. Paulson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Translated by Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Charles. ‘Islamization and Legal Reform in Pakistan, 1979–1989’. Pacific Affairs 63 (1990): 62–77.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Charles. ‘Islamization in Pakistan: Implementation of the Hudood Ordinances’. Asian Survey 28 (1988): 307–316.Google Scholar

Ketcham, Ralph, (ed.). The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Debates. New York: New American Library, 1986.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. ‘A Short View of Russia’. In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Vol. 9. London: Macmillan, 1971. 253–271.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. ‘National Self-Sufficiency’. The Yale Review 22 (1933): 755–769.Google Scholar

Teik, Khoo Boo. Paradoxes of Mahathirism: An Intellectual Biography of Mahathir Mohamad. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, Claire. ‘On the Rule of Law and Economic Emergency: The Degradation of Basic Legal Values in Europe’s Bailouts’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35 (2015): 325–353.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, Claire. ‘Are the EU Bail-Outs Immune to Social Challenge Because They Are Not EU Law?’ European Constitutional Law Review 10 (2014): 393–421.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, Claire. ‘Constitutions, Social Rights and Sovereign Debt States in Europe: A Challenging New Area of Constitutional Inquiry’. European University Institute Working Papers Law 2015/34. Florence, Italy: European University Institute, 2004. Available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/36097/LAW_2015_34.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

Klare, Karl. ‘Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism’. South African Journal on Human Rights 12 (1998): 146–188.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie. ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa’. International Organization 49 (1995): 451–478.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju. The National Security Constitution: Sharing Power after the Iran-Contra Affair. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Komarek, Jan, and Avbelj, Matej (eds.). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P., and Miller, Russell A.. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kong, Tao, and Ramayandi, Arief. ‘Survey of Recent Developments’. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 44 (2008): 25–28.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Histories of International law: Dealing with Eurocentrism’. Rechtsgeschichte 19 (2011): 152–176.Google Scholar

Kostal, R. W. ‘The Alchemy of Occupation: Karl Loewenstein and the Legal Reconstruction of Nazi Germany, 1945–1946’. Law and History Review 29 (2011): 1–52.Google Scholar

Kovacic, William E. ‘A Regulator’s Perspective on Getting the Balance Right’. In Ian McEwin, R. (ed.), Intellectual Property, Competition Law and Economics in Asia. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011. 23–34.Google Scholar

Krajewski, Markus, Neergaard, Ulla, and de Gronden, Johan van (eds.). The Changing Legal Framework for Services of General Interest in Europe: Between Competition and Solidarity. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford University, 2004.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul, ‘Secular Stagnation in the Euro Area’. New York Times, May 17, 2014. Reprinted at http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/17/secular-stagnation-in-the-euro-area/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=o.Google Scholar

Kumm, Matthias. ‘Rebel without a Good Cause: Karlsruhe’s Misguided Attempt to Draw the CJEU into a Game of “Chicken” and What the CJEU Might Do About It’. German Law Journal 15 (2014): 203–216.Google Scholar

Kumm, Matthias. ‘The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Between Constitutional Triumphalism and Nostalgia’. In Loughlin, Martin and Dobner, Petra (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, 2012. 201–220.Google Scholar

Kumm, Matthias. ‘How Does European Union Law Fit into the World of Public Law’. In Neyer, Jürgen and Wiener, Antje (eds.), Political Theory of the European Union. Oxford University Press, 2010. 111–139.Google Scholar

Kuppusamy, Baradan. ‘Can Christians Say “Allah”? In Malaysia, Muslims Say No’. Time, Jan. 8, 2010. Available at http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1952497,00.html.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Lang, Andrew. World Trade Law after Neo-Liberalism: Re-Imagining the Global Economic Order. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Larrére, Catherine. L’invention de l’économie aux XVIIIeme Siécle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar

Laslett, Peter. ‘Introduction’. In Locke, John, Second Treatise on Civil Government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. Cambridge University Press, 1980. 102–104.Google Scholar

Laslett, Peter. ‘John Locke, the Great Recoinage and the Origins of the Board of Trade: 1695–1698’. William and Mary Quarterly 14 (1957): 370–402.Google Scholar

Lasser, Mitchell. Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lau, Martin. The Role of Islam in the Legal System of Pakistan. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006.Google Scholar

Lavenex, Sandra. ‘Mutual Recognition and the Monopoly of Force: Limits of the Single Market Analogy’. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (2007): 762–779.Google Scholar

Lecercle, Jean-Louis. ‘Rousseau et Marx’. In Leigh, R. A. (ed.), Rousseau after 200 Years: Proceedings of the Cambridge Bicentennial Colloquium. Cambridge University Press, 2010. 67–86.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude. ‘The Permanence of the Theological-Political?’ In Democracy and Political Theory. Translated by D. Macey. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Legassick, Martin, and Ross, Robert. ‘From Slave Economy to Settler Capitalism: The Cape Colony and Its Extensions, 1800–1854’. In Hamilton, Carolyn, Mbenga, Bernard K., and Ross, Robert (eds.), The Cambridge History of South Africa, Vol. 1, From Early Times to 1885. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 253–318.Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre. ‘What “Legal Transplants?”’ In Nelken, David and Feest, Johannes (eds.), Adapting Legal Cultures. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001. 55–68.Google Scholar

Leopold, David. The Young Marx. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lerner, Abba P. ‘The Economics and Politics of Consumer Sovereignty’. American Economic Review 62 (1972): 258–266.Google Scholar

Levin, Robert A., and Hines, Laurie Moses. ‘Educational Television, Fred Rogers, and the History of Education’. History of Education Quarterly 43 (2003): 262–275.Google Scholar

Lewis, Norman. ‘Regulating Non-Government Bodies: Privatization, Accountability and the Public-Private Divide’. In Jowell, Jeffrey and Oliver, Dawn (eds.), The Changing Constitution. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. 219–247.Google Scholar

Yang, Li, ‘The Heated Debate Arising from the Constitutionalist Socialism Study’, Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 2 (2011): 164–169.Google Scholar

Liddle, William D. ‘“A Patriot King, or None”: Lord Bolingbroke and the American Renunciation of George III’. The Journal of American History 65 (1979): 951–970.Google Scholar

Lienesche, Michael. ‘Reinterpreting Rebellion: The Influence of Shays’s Rebellion on American Political Thought’. In Gross, Robert A (ed.), In Debt to Shays: The Bicentennial of an Agrarian Rebellion. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993. 161–182.Google Scholar

Tong, Liew Chin. ‘PAS Politics: Defining an Islamic State’. In Gomez, Edmund Terence (ed.), Politics in Malaysia: The Malay Dimension. London: Routledge, 2007. 107–137.Google Scholar

Likosky, Michael B. The Silicon Empire: Law, Culture and Commerce. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Hai, Lim Hong. ‘Electoral Politics in Malaysia: “Managing” Elections in a Plural Society’. In Croissant, Aurel, Bruns, Gabriele, and John, Marei (eds.), Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia. Singapore: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2002.Google Scholar

Lin, Li-Wen, and Milhaupt, Curtis J.. ‘We Are the (National) Champions: Understanding: The Mechanisms of State Capitalism in China’. Stanford Law Review 65 (2013): 697–759.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans. ‘A-Legality: Postnationalism and the Question of Legal Boundaries’. Modern Law Review 73 (2010): 30–56.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans. ‘Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood’. In Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford University Press, 2007. 9–27.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans. ‘Sovereignty and Representation in the EU’. In Walker, Neil (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003. 87–115.Google Scholar

Lindseth, Peter. Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. Drift and Mastery: An Attempt to Diagnose the Current Unrest. New York: Prentice Hall, 1961.Google Scholar

List, Friedrich. ‘The National System of Political Economy’. Reprinted in Magnusson, Lars (ed.), Free Trade: 1793–1886. Vol. 2. London: Routledge, 1997. 72–214.Google Scholar

Liu, Lawrence S. ‘In Fairness We Trust? – Why Fostering Competition Law and Policy Ain’t Easy in Asia’ (Oct. 19, 2004). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=610822.Google Scholar

Yang, Li, ‘The Heated Debate Arising from the Constitutionalist Socialism Study’, Xianzheng Shehui Zhuyi Luncong [Constitutional Socialism Forum] 2 (2011): 164–169.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, P.. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Karl. ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, Part 1’. The American Political Science Review 3 (1937): 417–432.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Karl. ‘Autocracy versus Democracy in Contemporary Europe, Part 2’. The American Political Science Review 29 (1935): 571–593.Google Scholar

Lombardi, Clark B. ‘Can Islamizing a Legal System Ever Help Promote Liberal Democracy? A View from Pakistan’. University of St. Thomas Law Journal 7 (2010): 647–691.Google Scholar

Lombardi, Clark B. ‘Islamism as a Response to Emergency Rule in Pakistan: The Surprising Proposal of Justice A. R. Cornelius’. In Ramraj, Victor V. and Thiruvengadam, Arun K. (eds.), Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality. Cambridge University Press, 2009. 436–65.Google Scholar

Lombardi, Clark B. State Law as Islamic Law in Modern Egypt. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

Lombardi, Clark B., and Brown, Nathan J. ‘Do Constitutions Requiring Adherence to Shari`a Threaten Human Rights? How Egypt’s Constitutional Court Reconciles Islamic Law with the Liberal Rule of Law’. American University International Law Review 21 (2006): 379–435.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘The Constitutional Imagination’. Modern Law Review 78 (2015): 1–25.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘Nomos.’ In Poole, Thomas and Dyzenhaus, David (eds.), Theorists of Constitutional Crisis: Oakeshott, Hayek and Schmitt on Law, Liberty and State. Cambridge University Press, 2015. 65–95.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘The Concept of Constituent Power’. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2014): 218–237.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘What Is Constitutionalisation?’ In Loughlin, Martin and Dobner, Petra (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, 2012. 47–69.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘In Defence of Staatslehre’. Der Staat 48 (2009): 1–28.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘Constituent Power Subverted: From English Constitutional Argument to British Constitutional Practice’. In Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, 2007. 27–49.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. ‘Ten Tenets of Sovereignty’. In Walker, Neil (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003. 55–86.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, and Walker, Neil (eds.). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Ludwig-Erhard-Stiftunge, V. Bonn. Standard Texts on the Social Market Economy: Two Centuries of Discussion. Edited by Wünsche, Horst Friedrich, translated by Derek Rutter. Stuttgart: Gustav Fisher Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. Law as a Social System. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2000.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990a.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. ‘Two Sides of the State Founded on Law’. In Political Theory in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990b. 187–202.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. ‘Der Staat als Historischer Begriff’. In Storme, Marcel (ed.), Mijmeringen van een Jurist bij 1984. Antwerp: Kluwer Publishers, 1984. 139–154.Google Scholar

MacCormick, John P. ‘The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10 (1997): 163–189.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Joan. Rousseau and the French Revolution: 1762–1791. London: Athlon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Macpherson, Crawford. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Madan, T. N. Modern Myths, Locked Minds: Secularism and Fundamentalism in India. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Maddox, Graham. ‘Constitution’. In Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Handon, Russell L. (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge University Press, 1989. 50–67.Google Scholar

Madison, James. ‘Federalist No. 10’. In Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John, The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, Clinton. New York: Signet Classics, 2003. 71–79.Google Scholar

Madison, James. ‘Federalist No. 52’. In Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter. New York: Signet Classics, 2003. 322–327.Google Scholar

Madison, James. ‘Federalist No. 57’. In Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, The Federalist Papers. Edited by Clinton Rossiter. New York: Signet Classics, 2003. 348–353.Google Scholar

‘Mahathir: Malaysia Is “Fundamentalist State”’. CNN.com, June 18, 2002. Available at http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/southeast/06/18/malaysia.mahathir/.Google Scholar

Maher, Imelda. ‘The Institutional Structure of Competition Law’. In Dowdle, Michael W., Gillespie, John, and Maher, Imelda (eds.), Asian Capitalism and the Regulation of Competition: Towards a Regulatory Geography of Global Competition Law. Cambridge University Press, 2013. 61–75.Google Scholar

Mahmassani, Ṣubḥī Rajab. Falsafat al-tashrī fī al-Islām: The Philosophy of Jurisprudence in Islam. Translated by Farhat Ziadeh. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 1961.Google Scholar

Mahmud, Tayyab. ‘Freedom of Religion and Religious Minorities in Pakistan: A Study of Judicial Practice’. Fordham International Law Journal 19 (1995–1996): 40–100.Google Scholar

Mahmud, Tayyab. ‘Praetorianism and Common Law in Post-colonial Settings: Judicial Responses to Constitutional Breakdowns in Pakistan’. Utah Law Review (1993): 1225–1305.Google Scholar

Maistre, Joseph de. ‘Study on Sovereignty’. In The Works of Joseph de Maistre. Edited and translated by Lively, Jack. London: Unwin Brothers Ltd, 1965. 93–129.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico. Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-Crisis. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Mancini, Federico. ‘The Case for Statehood’. European Law Journal 4 (1998): 29–42.Google Scholar

Mandela, Nelson. Long Walk to Freedom. Johannesburg: Macdonald, 1994.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. ‘The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results’. European Journal of Sociology 25 (1984): 185–213.Google Scholar

Marks, Gary, and Hooghe, Lisbet. ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’. British Journal of Political Science 39 (2009): 1–23.Google Scholar

Marks, Shula. ‘War and Union 1899–1910’. In Ross, Robert, Mager, Anne Kelk, and Nasson, Bill (eds.), The Cambridge History of South Africa. Vol. 2, 1885–1994. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 157–210.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H. Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays. Bloomington: University of Illinois Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital. Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Early Writings. Translated by Rodney Livingstone and Gregor Benton. London: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar

Mashaw, Jerry L. ‘Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 115–156.Google Scholar

Masud, M. K. ‘Rethinking Shari`a: Javed Ahmad Ghamidi on Hudud.’ Die Welt des Islams 47 (2007): 356–375.Google Scholar

Mathews, A. S. Freedom, State Security and the Rule of Law. Cape Town: Juta, 1986.Google Scholar

Maulin, Eric. La théorie de l’état de Carré de Malberg. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar

Mayer, Jurgen. ‘Rebels without a Cause? A Critical Analysis of the German Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference’. German Law Journal 15 (2014): 111–146.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark. Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century. London: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar

McCormick, John. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Means, Gordon P. ‘Malaysia: Islam in a Pluralist Society’. In Caldarola, Carlo (ed.), Religions and Societies: Asia and the Middle East. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1983. 445–496.Google Scholar

Mehta, Uday Singh. ‘Constitutionalism’. In Jayal, Niraja Gopal and Mehta, Pratap Bhanu (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Politics in India. Oxford University Press, 2010. 15–27.Google Scholar

Mehta, Uday Singh. ‘Gandhi on Democracy, Politics and the Ethics of Everyday Life’. Modern Intellectual History 7 (2010): 355–371.Google Scholar

Meierhenrich, Jens. The Legacies of Law: Long-Run Consequences of Legal Development in South Africa, 1652–2000. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Menendez, Agustín José. ‘The Existential Crisis of the European Union’. German Law Journal 14 (2013): 453–526.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Barbara Daly. Islam in South Asia in Practice. Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. ‘Law’s Republic’. Yale Law Journal 97 (1988): 1493–1537.Google Scholar

Milne, R. S., and Mauzy, Diane K.. Malaysian Politics under Mahathir. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Milward, Alan. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Verso, 1992.Google Scholar

Misra, Bankey Bihari. The Bureaucracy in India: An Historical Analysis of Development up to 1947. Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph. ‘“We Are (Afraid of) the People”: Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism’. In Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford University Press, 2007. 87–107.Google Scholar

Möllers, Christoph. ‘‘The Scope and Legitimacy of Judicial Review in German Constitutional Law – The Court versus the Political Process’. In Punder, Hermann and Waldhoff, Christian (eds.), Debates in German Public Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar

Mollers, Kai. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Montagu Chelmsford Report on Indian Constitutional Reform. Superintendent, , Government of India Press, 1918.Google Scholar

Morgan, Bronwen. ‘Technocratic v. Convivial Accountability’. In Dowdle, Michael W. (ed.), Public Accountability, Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 243–268.Google Scholar

Morison, John, McEvoy, Kieran, and Anthony, Gordon (eds.). Judges, Transition, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Moten, Abdul Rashid. ‘2008 General Elections in Malaysia: Democracy at Work’. Japanese Journal of Political Science 10 (2009): 21–42.Google Scholar

‘Mr. Fred Rogers: Senate Statement on PBS Funding, Delivered 1 May 1969’. American Rhetoric Online Speech Bank. Available at http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fredrogerssenatetestimonypbs.htm.Google Scholar

Mulgan, Richard. ‘Contracting Out and Accountability’. Australian Journal of Public Administration 56 (1997): 106–116.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth Century Europe. Revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth Century Thought. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Mumtaz, Khawar, and Shaheed, Farida (eds). Women of Pakistan: Two Steps Forward and One Step Back? London: Zed Books, 1987.Google Scholar

Munir, Abu Bakar. ‘Privatisation in Malaysia: A Case Study of the Telecommunications Department’. In Quah, Euston and Neilson, William (eds.), Law and Economic Development: Cases and Materials from South East Asia. Singapore: Longman, 1993. 169–176.Google Scholar

Munir, Muhammad, and Kayani, M. R.. Report of the Court of Inquiry Constituted under Punjab Act II of 1954 to Enquire into the Punjab Disturbances of 1953. Punjab: Superintendent, Government Printing, 1954. Reprinted at http://aaiil.org/text/books/others/misc/munirreport/munirreport.shtml.Google Scholar

Naidoo, Phyllis. 156 Hands That Built South Africa. Cape Town: Stephan Phillips, 2006.Google Scholar

Nakano, Takeshi. ‘Theorising Economic Nationalism’. Nations and Nationalism 10 (2004): 211–229.Google Scholar

Nandy, Ashish. ‘The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Toleration’. In Bhargava, Rajeev (ed.), Secularism and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, 1999. 321–344.Google Scholar

Napoleon, I. The Corsican: A Diary of Napoleon’s Life in His Own Words. Edited by Johnston, R. M.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1910.Google Scholar

Nasr, Seyyed Vali Reza. The Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution: The Jamaʻat-i Islami of Pakistan. University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nasson, Bill. The War for South Africa. Cape Town: Tafelberg, 2010.Google Scholar

Nathan, K. S. ‘Malaysia in 1989: Communists End Armed Struggle’. Asian Survey 30 (1990): 210–220.Google Scholar

National Operations Council [Malaysia]. The May 13 Tragedy: A Report of the National Operations Council. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer, 1969.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Translated by M. Boscagli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Neo, Jaclyn L. ‘Competing Imperatives: Conflicts and Convergences in State and Islam in Pluralist Malaysia’. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 4 (2015): 1–25.Google Scholar

Neo, Jaclyn Ling-Chien. ‘Malay Nationalism, Islamic Supremacy and the Constitutional Bargain in the Multi-ethnic Composition of Malaysia’. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 13 (2006): 95–118.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick. ‘Rousseau’s Critique of Economic Inequality’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2013): 193–215.Google Scholar

Neumann, Franz. ‘On the Preconditions and Legal Concept of an Economic Constitution’. In Kirchheimer, Otto and Neumann, Franz (eds.), Social Democracy and the Rule of Law. Edited by Tribe, Keith. London: Allen and Unwin, 1987. 44–65.Google Scholar

Newberg, Paula R. Judging the State: Courts and Constitutional Politics in Pakistan. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Noor, Farish A. ‘The Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) of Malaysia: Communitarianism across Borders?’ RSIS Working Paper Series No. 163. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), July 2008. Available at https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/163-wp163-the-hindu-rights-actio/#.VZ3g9fmm3o4.Google Scholar

Norton, Michael I. ‘Unequality: Who Gets What and Why It Matters’. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (2014): 151–155.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. On Human Conduct. Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar