Select bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Harmony in Chopin , pp. 286 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Select bibliography
Agawu, V. K., “Concepts of Closure and Chopin’s Opus 28,” Music Theory Spectrum 9 (1987), pp. 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anson-Cartwright, M., “Concepts of Closure in Tonal Music: A Critical Study,” Theory and Practice 32 (2007), pp. 1–17Google Scholar
BaileyShea, M., “Teaching Agency and Narrative Analysis: The Chopin Preludes in E Minor and E Major,” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 25 (2011), pp. 9–36Google Scholar
Barbag-Drexler, I., “Zur Harmonik Chopins,” Musikerziehung 27 (1973–1974), pp. 202–207Google Scholar
Bass, R., “Enharmonic Position Finding and the Resolution of Seventh Chords in Chromatic Music,” Music Theory Spectrum 29 (2007), pp. 73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, D. W., “Chopin’s Mazurka, Op. 17, No. 4,” Theory and Practice 2/3 (1977), pp. 12–16Google Scholar
Bellman, J., Chopin’s Polish Ballade: Op. 38 as Narrative of National Martyrdom, Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar
Berger, K., “The Form of Chopin’s Ballade, Op. 23,” 19th-Century Music 20 (1996–1997), pp. 46–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biamonte, N., “Variations on a Scheme: Bach’s ‘Crucifixus’ and Chopin’s and Scriabin’s E-Minor Preludes,” Intégral 26 (2012), pp. 47–89Google Scholar
Bronarski, L., Harmonika Chopina, Warsaw: Towarzystwo Wydawnicze Muzyki Polskiej, 1935Google Scholar
Bronarski, L., “Le plus ‘chopinesque’ des accords de Chopin,” Schweizerische Musikzeitung 85 (1945), pp. 382–385Google Scholar
Brown, M., “The Diatonic and Chromatic in Schenker’s Theory of Harmonic Relations,” Journal of Music Theory 30 (1986), pp. 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M., Dempster, D., and Headlam, D., “The ♯IV(♭V) Hypothesis: Testing the Limits of Schenker’s Theory of Tonality,” Music Theory Spectrum 19 (1997), pp. 155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, C., “The Polyphonic Melodic Line of Chopin’s B-Minor Prelude,” in Chopin, Preludes, Op. 28, ed. Higgins, T., New York: Norton, 1973, pp. 80–88Google Scholar
Burkhart, C., “Chopin’s ‘Concluding Expansions,’” in Nineteenth-Century Piano Music: Essays in Performance and Analysis, ed. Witten, D., New York: Garland, 1997, pp. 95–116Google Scholar
Burkhart, C., “The Phrase Rhythm of Chopin’s A-flat Major Mazurka, Op. 59, No. 2,” in Engaging Music: Essays in Music Analysis, ed. Stein, D., Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 3–12Google Scholar
Burkhart, C., “The Two Curious Moments in Chopin’s E-flat Major Prelude,” in Structure and Meaning in Tonal Music: Festschrift in Honor of Carl Schachter, ed. Burstein, L. P. and Gagné, D., Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2006, pp. 5–18Google Scholar
Burstein, L. P., “Unraveling Schenker’s Concept of the Auxiliary Cadence,” Music Theory Spectrum 27 (2005), pp. 159–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascelli, A., “Schenker, Chopin’s Berceuse Op. 57 and the Rhetoric of Variations,” Ad Parnassum: A Journal of Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Instrumental Music 1/2 (2003), pp. 51–79Google Scholar
Cascelli, A., “Chopin as Salon Composer: Schenker’s Reception of Chopin,” in Chopin’s Musical Worlds: The 1840s, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2007, pp. 83–96Google Scholar
Cascelli, A., “Chopin’s Music and the Development of Schenker’s Analytical Thought,” in Essays from the Fourth International Schenker Symposium, vol. 2, ed. Burstein, L. P., Rogers, L., and Bottge, K. M., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2013, pp. 49–70Google Scholar
Chailley, J., “L’importance de Chopin dans l’évolution du langage harmonique,” in The Book of the First International Musicological Congress Devoted to the Works of Frédéric Chopin, Warszawa 16th – 22nd February 1960, ed. Lissa, Z., Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1963, pp. 30–43Google Scholar
Chołopow, J. N., “Besonderheiten von Chopins Harmonik im ästhetischen Kontext der Frühromantik,” in Chopin and His Work in the Context of Culture, ed. Poniatowska, I., Cracow: Polska Akademia Chopinowska, Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, Musica Iagellonica, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 313–326Google Scholar
Cholopow, J. N., “Über die Kompositionsgrundsätze bei Frédéric Chopin: Das Rätsel des Finales der Sonate b-moll,” trans. Janssen, M. W., Chopin Studies 3 (1990), pp. 265–295Google Scholar
Cinnamon, H., “New Observations on Voice Leading, Hemiola, and Their Roles in Tonal and Rhythmic Structures in Chopin’s Prelude in B Minor, Op. 28, No. 6,” Intégral 6 (1992), pp. 66–106Google Scholar
Cinnamon, H., “E Major Harmony as Dominant or Mediant in Chopin’s Op. 10/1: Schenker’s Graphs from Free Composition Reconsidered,” Indiana Theory Review 15 (1994), pp. 1–20Google Scholar
Cone, E. T., “Ambiguity and Reinterpretation in Chopin,” in Chopin Studies 2, ed. Rink, J. and Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 140–160Google Scholar
Damschroder, D., “Schubert, Chromaticism, and the Ascending 5–6 Sequence,” Journal of Music Theory 50 (2006), pp. 253–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damschroder, D., Thinking About Harmony: Historical Perspectives on Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damschroder, D., Review of “Beethoven’s Tempest Sonata: Perspectives of Analysis and Performance” (ed. Bergé, P.), Music Theory Online 16/2 (June 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damschroder, D., “Schenker, Schubert, and the Subtonic Chord,” in A Music-Theoretical Matrix: Essays in Honor of Allen Forte (Part II), ed. Berry, D. C., Gamut: Online Journal of the Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic 3 (2010), pp. 127–166Google Scholar
Damschroder, D., Harmony in Haydn and Mozart, Cambridge University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damschroder, D., “Conspicuous 6-Phase Chords in the Closing Movement of Schubert’s Piano Sonata in B-Flat Major (D. 960),” in Rethinking Schubert, ed. Bodley, L. Byrne and Horton, J., Oxford University Press, in pressGoogle Scholar
Damschroder, D., Tonal Analysis: A Schenkerian Perspective, New York: W. W. Norton, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
Davis, A., “Chopin and the Romantic Sonata: The First Movement of Op. 58,” Music Theory Spectrum 36 (2014), pp. 270–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K., “Roads Taken and Retaken: Foreground Ambiguity in Chopin’s Prelude in A-flat, Op. 28, No. 17,” Canadian University Music Review 11 (1991), pp. 34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derfler, B., Single-Voice Transformations: A Model for Parsimonious Voice Leading, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010Google Scholar
Dommel-Diény, A., L’analyse harmonique en exemples de J.-S. Bach à Debussy: Contribution à une recherche de l’interprétation: Chopin, Paris: Éditions musicales Transatlantiques, 1970Google Scholar
Drabkin, W., “Chopin, Schenker, and ‘Musical Form,’” Ostinato rigore: Revue internationale d’études musicales 15 (2000), pp. 173–186Google Scholar
Edlund, B., “Chopin’s A Major Prelude: Une pièce résistante,” in Analytical Perspectives on the Music of Chopin, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2003, pp. 167–183Google Scholar
Eibner, F., “Chopins kontrapunktisches Denken,” in Chopin-Jahrbuch 1956, ed. Zagiba, F., Vienna: Amalthea, 1956, pp. 103–122Google Scholar
Eibner, F., “Die Stimmführung Chopins in der Darstellung Heinrich Schenkers,” in The Book of the First International Musicological Congress Devoted to the Works of Frédéric Chopin, Warszawa 16th – 22nd February 1960, ed. Lissa, Z., Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers, 1963, pp. 145–167Google Scholar
Eibner, F., “Über die Akkorde im Satz Chopins,” Chopin-Jahrbuch 1970, ed. Zagiba, F., Vienna: Notring der wissenschaftlichen Verbände Österreichs, 1970, pp. 3–24Google Scholar
Eigeldinger, J.-J., “Chopin and ‘La note bleue’: An Interpretation of the Prelude Op. 45,” Music & Letters 78 (1997), pp. 233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitan, Z., “Associative Convergence and the Structure of Chopin’s ‘Revolutionary’ Étude,” Israel Studies in Musicology 6 (1996), pp. 153–178Google Scholar
Federhofer, H., “Chopins Werk als Demonstrationsobjekt in Lehrbüchern der Musiktheorie,” Chopin Studies 3 (1990), pp. 207–218Google Scholar
Galand, J., “Form, Genre, and Style in the Eighteenth-Century Rondo,” Music Theory Spectrum 17 (1995), pp. 27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gołąb, M. “Über den Tristan-Akkord bei Chopin,” trans. Hirszenberg, B., Chopin Studies 3 (1990), pp. 246–256Google Scholar
Golab, M. Chromatyka i tonalnoséc w muzyce Chopina. Cracow: Polskie Wydawnictwo Muzyczne, 1991;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Golab, M. “Das Problem der Haupttonart in den Werken von Chopin,” trans. Hirszenberg, B., Chopin Studies 5 (1995), pp. 235–244Google Scholar
Goldberg, H., “Phrase Structure in Chopin’s Early Works in Light of Elsner’s Instruction,” Indiana Theory Review 28 (2010), pp. 1–13Google Scholar
Gut, S., “Interférences entre le langage et la structure dans la Ballade en sol mineur opus 23 de Chopin,” Chopin Studies 5 (1995), pp. 64–72Google Scholar
Hatten, R. S., “Performance and Analysis – or Synthesis: Theorizing Gesture, Topics, and Tropes in Chopin’s F-Minor Ballade,” Indiana Theory Review 28 (2010), pp. 45–66Google Scholar
Hatten, R. S., “Performing Expressive Closure in Structurally Open Contexts: Chopin’s Prelude in A minor and the Last Two Dances of Schumann’s Davidsbündlertänze,” Music Theory Online 20.4 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helman, Z., “Chopin’s Harmonic Devices in 20th-Century Theoretical Thought,” trans. Tarska, E., in Studies in Chopin, Warsaw: The Chopin Society, 1973, pp. 49–61Google Scholar
Hood, A., “Intraopus Connections in Chopin’s Nocturnes, Opus 27,” in The Sources of Chopin’s Style: Inspirations and Contexts, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2005, pp. 371–385Google Scholar
Hood, A., “Ambiguity of Tonal Meaning in Chopin’s Prelude Opus 28, No. 22,” Festschrift for Steve Larson, Music Theory Online 18/3 (September 2012)Google Scholar
Hoyt, R. J., “Harmonic Process, Melodic Process, and Interpretive Aspects of Chopin’s Prelude in G Minor,” Indiana Theory Review 5/3 (1981–1982), pp. 22–42Google Scholar
Hoyt, R. J., “Chopin’s Prelude in A Minor Revisited: The Issue of Tonality,” In Theory Only 8/6 (1984–1985), pp. 7–16Google Scholar
Hüppe, E., “Wiederholung als Prozeß: Struktur und Multiperspektivik in der Polonaise-Fantaisie Op. 61,” Musiktheorie 19 (2004), pp. 159–176Google Scholar
Hyer, B., “Chopin and the In-F-Able,” in Musical Transformation and Musical Intuition: Eleven Essays in Honor of David Lewin, ed. Atlas, R. and Cherlin, M., Roxbury, MA: Ovenbird, 1994, pp. 147–166Google Scholar
Jackson, R., “Concerning Chopin’s ‘Enigmatical’ Finale in the Sonata in B♭ Minor, Op. 35,” Journal of Musicological Research 31 (2012), pp. 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallberg, J., “Compatibility in Chopin’s Multi-Partite Publications,” Journal of Musicology 2 (1983), pp. 391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallberg, J., “Chopin’s Last Style,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 38 (1985), pp. 264–315; reprinted in Kallberg, (1996), pp. 89–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallberg, J., “The Rhetoric of Genre: Chopin’s Nocturne in G Minor,” 19th-Century Music 11 (1987–1988), pp. 238–261; reprinted in Kallberg, (1996), pp. 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallberg, J., “The Problem of Repetition and Return in Chopin’s Mazurkas,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 1–23Google Scholar
Kallberg, J., Chopin at the Boundaries: Sex, History, and Musical Genre, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996Google Scholar
Kielian-Gilbert, M., “Motivic Transfer in Chopin’s A Minor Prelude,” In Theory Only 9/1 (1986), pp. 21–32Google Scholar
Kielian-Gilbert, M., “Chopiniana and Music’s Contextual Allusions,” in The Age of Chopin: Interdisciplinary Inquiries, ed. Goldberg, H., Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004, pp. 162–200Google Scholar
Kinderman, W., “Directional Tonality in Chopin,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 59–75Google Scholar
Kirsch, W., “Chopins Préludes e-Moll und h-Moll (op. 28): Ein Analyse- und Interpretationsversuch,” in Studien zur Musikgeschichte: Eine Festschrift für Ludwig Finscher, ed. Laubenthal, A., Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1995, pp. 572–581Google Scholar
Klein, M. “Chopin’s Fourth Ballade as Musical Narrative,” Music Theory Spectrum 26 (2004), pp. 23–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. Intertextuality in Western Art Music, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Klein, M. “Ironic Narrative, Ironic Reading,” Journal of Music Theory 53 (2009), pp. 95–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. “Chopin’s Dreams: The Mazurka in C♯ Minor, Op. 30, No. 4,” 19th-Century Music 35 (2011–2012), pp. 238–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, D., Chromatic Transformations in Nineteenth-Century Music, Cambridge University Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, D., “On Performing Chopin’s Barcarolle,” Music Theory Online 20/4 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körber, T. A., “Die ‘24 Etüden’ von Fryderyk Chopin: Versuch einer Erschließung ihrer Tonalität,” in Fryderyk Chopin: Sein und Werk/Being and Work, ed. Szczurko, E. and Guz, T., Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2010, pp. 203–236Google Scholar
Korsyn, K., “Directional Tonality and Intertextuality: Brahms’s Quintet Op. 88 and Chopin’s Ballade Op. 38,” in The Second Practice of Nineteenth-Century Tonality, ed. Kinderman, W. and Krebs, H., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1996, pp. 45–83Google Scholar
Kramer, L., “Romantic Meaning in Chopin’s Prelude in A Minor,” 19th-Century Music 9 (1985–1986), pp. 145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, L., “Chopin’s Rogue Pitches: Artifice, Personification, and the Cult of the Dandy in Three Later Mazurkas,” 19th-Century Music 35 (2011–2012), pp. 224–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H., “Alternatives to Monotonality in Early Nineteenth-Century Music,” Journal of Music Theory 25 (1981), pp. 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H., “Tonal and Formal Dualism in Chopin’s Scherzo, Op. 31,” Music Theory Spectrum 13 (1991), pp. 48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H., “Metrical Disturbances in Chopin’s ‘Third Ballade,’” in Analytical Perspectives on the Music of Chopin, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2003, pp. 139–155Google Scholar
Kresky, J., Tonal Music: Twelve Analytic Studies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977Google Scholar
Kresky, J., A Reader’s Guide to the Chopin Preludes, Westport, CN: Greenwood Press, 1994Google Scholar
Laufer, E., “On Chopin’s Fourth Ballade,” in Keys to the Drama: Nine Perspectives on Sonata Form, ed. Sly, G., Farnham: Ashgate, 2009, pp. 157–175Google Scholar
Lehner, M., “‘So fängt nur Chopin an … so schließt nur er’: Initial- und Finalgestaltung in Chopins Mazurken,” Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie 7/3 (2010), pp. 345–360Google Scholar
Leichtentritt, H., Analyse der Chopin’schen Klavierwerke, 2 vols., Berlin: M. Hesse, 1921–1922Google Scholar
Leikin, A., “Chopin’s A-minor Prelude and Its Symbolic Language,” International Journal of Musicology 6 (1997), pp. 149–162Google Scholar
Leikin, A., “Genre Connotations, Thematic Allusions, and Formal Implications in Chopin’s Nocturne Op. 27 No. 1,” in Chopin and His Work in the Context of Culture: Studies, 2 vols., ed. Poniotowska, I., Cracow: Polska Akademia Chopinowska, Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, Musica Iagellonica, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 232–242Google Scholar
Lester, J., “Harmonic Complexity and Form in Chopin’s Mazurkas,” Ostinato rigore: Revue internationale d’études musicales 15 (2000), pp. 101–120Google Scholar
London, J., and Rodman, R., “Musical Genre and Schenkerian Analysis,” Journal of Music Theory 42 (1998), pp. 101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreless, P., “The Pitch-Class Motive in Tonal Analysis: Some Historical and Critical Observations,” Res musica 3 (2011), pp. 52–67Google Scholar
McKee, E., Decorum of the Minuet, Delirium of the Waltz: A Study of Dance–Music Relations in 3/4 Time, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Meeùs, N. “Techniques modales dans l’harmonie des Mazurkas de Chopin,” Analyse musicale 21 (1990), pp. 102–112Google Scholar
Meeùs, N. “Questions de méthode: La Mazurka op. 7 no. 5 de Chopin,” Analyse musicale 32 (1993), pp. 58–63Google Scholar
Morgan, R. P., “Chopin’s Modular Forms,” in Variations on the Canon: Essays on Music from Bach to Boulez in Honor of Charles Rosen on His Eightieth Birthday, ed. Curry, R., Gable, D., and Marshall, R. L., University of Rochester Press, 2008, pp. 185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narmour, E., “Melodic Structuring of Harmonic Dissonance: A Method for Analysing Chopin’s Contribution to the Development of Harmony,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 77–114Google Scholar
Neumeyer, D., “Themes and Lines: On the Question of Hierarchy in the Practice of Linear Analysis,” Res musica 3 (2011), pp. 9–27Google Scholar
Newcomb, A., “The Polonaise-Fantasy and Issues of Musical Narrative,” in Chopin Studies 2, ed. Rink, J. and Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 84–101Google Scholar
Noland, K. K., “‘Grundgestalt’ and Diatonic/Octatonic Interaction in Chopin’s F Minor Ballade,” in Chopin’s Musical Worlds: The 1840s, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2007, pp. 203–246Google Scholar
Nowik, W., “Chopins Mazurka F moll, Op. 68, Nr. 4: ‘Die letzte Inspiration des Meisters,’” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 30 (1973), pp. 109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowik, W., “The Work of Frédéric Chopin in the Light of the Theoretical Conceptions of the First Half of the Nineteenth Century,” in Analytical Perspectives on the Music of Chopin, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2003, pp. 227–240Google Scholar
Oster, E., “The Fantaisie-Impromptu: A Tribute to Beethoven,” Musicology 1 (1946–1947), pp. 407–429;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Parks, R. S., “Voice Leading and Chromatic Harmony in the Music of Chopin,” Journal of Music Theory 20 (1976), pp. 189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, J. V., “Register, Large-Scale Structure, and Piano Sound in Chopin’s Works of the 1830s,” in Chopin in Paris: The 1830s, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2006, pp. 145–162Google Scholar
Petty, W. C., “Chopin and the Ghost of Beethoven,” 19th-Century Music 22 (1998–1999), pp. 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, G., “A Response to Schenker’s Analysis of Chopin’s Étude, Opus 10, No. 12 Using Schoenberg’s Grundgestalt Concept,” The Musical Quarterly 69 (1983), pp. 543–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, J., “Klang in Chopins Prélude op. 28, Nr. 2,” Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie 3 (2006), pp. 209–222Google Scholar
Quint, J., “Unendliche Skepsis: Offene Form in Chopins Mazurken,” Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie 7/3 (2010), pp. 255–266Google Scholar
Rink, J., “The Barcarolle: Auskomponierung and Apotheosis,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 195–219Google Scholar
Rink, J., “Chopin and Schenker: Improvisation and Musical Structure,” Chopin Studies 3 (1990), pp. 219–231Google Scholar
Rink, J., “Tonal Architecture in the Early Music,” in The Cambridge Companion to Chopin, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 78–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rink, J., “Schenker and Improvisation,” Journal of Music Theory 37 (1993), pp. 1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rink, J., “Authentic Chopin: History, Analysis and Intuition in Performance,” Chopin Studies 2, ed. Rink, J. and Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 214–244Google Scholar
Rink, J., “Chopin’s Ballades and the Dialectic: Analysis in Historical Perspective,” Music Analysis 13 (1994), pp. 99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rink, J., “‘Structural Momentum’ and Closure in Chopin’s Nocturne Op. 9, No. 2,” Chopin Studies 5 (1995), pp. 82–104;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Rink, J., “Chopin’s Improvisatory Music: Style, Structure, Aesthetics,” Ostinato rigore: Revue internationale d’études musicales 15 (2000), pp. 7–17Google Scholar
Rogers, M. R., “Chopin, Prelude in A Minor, Op. 28, No. 2,” 19th-Century Music 4 (1980–1981), pp. 245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, C., “The First Movement of Chopin’s Sonata in B♭ Minor, Op. 35,” 19th-Century Music 14/1 (1990–1991), pp. 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothgeb, J., “Chopin’s C-Minor Nocturne, Op. 48, No. 1, First Part: Voice Leading and Motivic Content,” Theory and Practice 5/2 (1980), pp. 26–31Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., “Phrase Rhythm in Chopin’s Nocturnes and Mazurkas,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 115–141Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music, New York: Schirmer, 1989; reprint edn., Ann Arbor: Musicalia, 2007Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., “Ambiguity in the Themes of Chopin’s First, Second, and Fourth Ballades,” Intégral 8 (1994), pp. 1–50Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., “The Form of Chopin’s Polonaise-Fantasy,” in Music Theory in Concept and Practice, ed. Baker, J. M., Beach, D. W., and Bernard, J. W., University of Rochester Press, 1997, pp. 337–359Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., “Chopin and the B-Major Complex: A Study in the Psychology of Composition,” Ostinato rigore: Revue internationale d’études musicales 15 (2000), pp. 149–172Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., “Like Falling Off a Log: Rubato in Chopin’s Prelude in A-flat Major (Op. 28, No. 17),” Music Theory Online 11/1 (2005)Google Scholar
Rothstein, W., “Circular Motion in Chopin’s Late B-Major Nocturne (Op. 62, No. 1),” in Structure and Meaning in Tonal Music: Festschrift in Honor of Carl Schachter, ed. Burstein, L. P. and Gagné, D., Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2006, pp. 19–32Google Scholar
Salzer, F., Structural Hearing: Tonal Coherence in Music, 2 vols., New York: Boni, 1952; reprint edn., New York: Dover, 1962Google Scholar
Salzer, F., “Chopin’s Nocturne in C-Sharp Minor, Op. 27, No. 1,” The Music Forum 2 (1970), pp. 283–297Google Scholar
Salzer, F., “Chopin’s Étude in F Major, Opus 25, No. 3: The Scope of Tonality,” The Music Forum 3 (1973), pp. 281–290Google Scholar
Samson, J., “The Composition-Draft of the Polonaise-Fantasy: The Issue of Tonality,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 41–58Google Scholar
Samson, J., “Chopin’s F Sharp Impromptu: Notes on Genre, Style and Structure,” Chopin Studies 3 (1990), pp. 297–304Google Scholar
Samson, J., “Chopin Reception: Theory, History, Analysis,” in Chopin Studies 2, ed. Rink, J. and Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 1–17Google Scholar
Samson, J., “The Second Ballade: Historical and Analytical Perspectives,” Chopin Studies 5 (1995), pp. 73–81Google Scholar
Samson, J., “Chopin’s Alternatives to Monotonality: A Historical Perspective,” in The Second Practice of Nineteenth-Century Tonality, ed. Kinderman, W. and Krebs, H., Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1996, pp. 34–44Google Scholar
Samson, J., “Chopin and the Traditions of Pedagogy,” in New Paths: Aspects of Music Theory and Aesthetics in the Age of Romanticism, Leuven University Press, 2009, pp. 115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C., “Chopin’s Fantasy, Op. 49: The Two-Key Scheme,” in Chopin Studies, ed. Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 221–253;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C., Review of The Music of Chopin by Jim Samson and The Music of Brahms by Michael Musgrave, Music Analysis 8 (1989), pp. 187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C., “Either/Or,” in Schenker Studies, ed. Siegel, H., Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 165–179;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C., “Chopin’s Prelude in D Major, Op. 28, No. 5: Analysis and Performance,” Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy 8 (1994), pp. 27–45Google Scholar
Schachter, C., “The Prelude in E Minor Op. 28 No. 4: Autograph Sources and Interpretation,” in Chopin Studies 2, ed. Rink, J. and Samson, J., Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 161–182Google Scholar
Schachter, C., “Structure as Foreground: ‘Das Drama des Ursatzes,’” in Schenker Studies 2, ed. Schachter, C. and Siegel, H., Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 298–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C., “The Triad as Place and Action,” Music Theory Spectrum 17 (1995), pp. 149–169;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Schachter, C., “Counterpoint and Chromaticism in Chopin’s Mazurka in C♯ Minor, Opus 50, Number 3,” Ostinato rigore: Revue internationale d’études musicales 15 (2000), pp. 121–134Google Scholar
Schachter, C., “Idiosyncrasies of Phrase Rhythm in Chopin’s Mazurkas,” in The Age of Chopin: Interdisciplinary Inquiries, ed. Goldberg, H., Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004, pp. 95–105Google Scholar
Schachter, C., “Che Inganno! The Analysis of Deceptive Cadences,” in Essays from the Third International Schenker Symposium, ed. Cadwallader, A., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2006, pp. 279–298Google Scholar
Schenker, H., Harmonielehre: Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien I, Stuttgart: Cotta, 1906;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Schenker, H., Der Tonwille: Flugblätter zum Zeugnis unwandelbarer Gesetze der Tonkunst, einer neuen Jugend dargebracht, 2 vols., Vienna: A. J. Gutmann, Leipzig: F. Hofmeister, 1921–1924;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Schenker, H., Das Meisterwerk in der Musik: Ein Jahrbuch, 3 vols., Munich: Drei Masken, 1925, 1926, 1930;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Schenker, H., Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln, Vienna: Universal Edition, 1932; as Five Graphic Music Analyses, ed. Weisse, H., New York: David Mannes Music School, [1933]; reprint edn., ed. Salzer, F., New York: Dover, 1969Google Scholar
Schenker, H., Der freie Satz: Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien III, Vienna: Universal, 1935; rev. edn., ed. Jonas, O., Vienna: Universal, 1956; as Free Composition, trans. and ed. Oster, E., New York: Longman, 1979; reprint of trans. edn., Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 2001Google Scholar
Schenker, H., The Oster Collection: Papers of Heinrich Schenker, New York Public Library, Lincoln Center, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Schmalfeldt, J., In the Process of Becoming: Analytic and Philosophical Perspectives on Form in Early Nineteenth-Century Music, Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Smith, C. J., “On Hearing the Chopin Preludes as a Coherent Set: A Survey of Some Possible Structural Models for Op. 28,” In Theory Only 1/4 (1975–1976), pp. 5–16Google Scholar
Smith, C. J., “Towards the Construction of Intersecting Divergent Models for Chopin’s ‘Three Against Two’ Étude,” In Theory Only 1/3 (1975–1976), pp. 19–25Google Scholar
Smith, C. J., “Registering Distinctions: Octave Non-Equivalence in Chopin’s Butterfly Etude,” In Theory Only 3/5 (1977–1978), pp. 32–40Google Scholar
Smith, C. J., “The Functional Extravagance of Chromatic Chords,” Music Theory Spectrum 8 (1986), pp. 94–139;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. J., “‘Rounding Up the Usual Suspects?’: The Enigmatic Narrative of Chopin’s C-Sharp Minor Prelude,” in Engaging Music: Essays in Music Analysis, ed. Stein, D., Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 236–252Google Scholar
Spicer, M. J., “Root Versus Linear Analysis of Chromaticism: A Comparative Study of Selected Excerpts from the Oeuvres of Chopin,” College Music Symposium 36 (1996), pp. 138–147Google Scholar
Subotnik, R. R., “Romantic Music as Post-Kantian Critique: Classicism, Romanticism, and the Concept of the Semiotic Universe,” in On Criticizing Music: Five Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Price, K., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981, pp. 74–98Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, W. D., “Chopin’s Counterpoint: The Largo from the Cello Sonata, Opus 65,” The Musical Quarterly 83 (1999), pp. 114–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suurpää, L., “The Path from Tonic to Dominant in the Second Movement of Schubert’s String Quintet and in Chopin’s Fourth Ballade,” Journal of Music Theory 44 (2000), pp. 451–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suurpää, L., “Non-Congruent Temporal Functions in Chopin’s Nocturne Op. 62, No. 2,” Dutch Journal of Music Theory: Tijdschrift voor Muziektheorie 16 (2011), pp. 64–71Google Scholar
Swartz, A., “Folk Dance Elements in Chopin’s Mazurkas,” Journal of Musicological Research 4 (1982–1983), pp. 417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teboul, J.-C., “Les trois Études écrites pour la Méthode des Méthodes de Moscheles et Fétis: Approche schenkérienne,” Ostinato rigore: Revue internationale d’études musicales 15 (2000), pp. 249–263Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, M., “From Studies of the Resonance of Chopin’s Music: The Étude in A Minor, Op. 25, No. 11 in the Light of Its Critical Interpretations,” trans. Harley, M. A., Chopin Studies 7 (2000) pp. 94–127Google Scholar
Tuchowski, A., “Scherzo C Sharp Minor: The Problem of Structural Consistency and Motivic Transformations,” Chopin Studies 5 (1995), pp. 190–197Google Scholar
Tuchowski, A., “Chopin’s Work in the Light of Post-Schenkerian Methods,” in Analytical Perspectives on the Music of Chopin, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2003, pp. 79–97Google Scholar
Tymoczko, D., A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice, Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Viljoen, N., “The Drone Bass and Its Implications for the Tonal Voice-Leading Structure in Two Selected Mazurkas by Chopin,” Indiana Theory Review 6 (1982–1983), pp. 17–35Google Scholar
Viljoen, N., “The Motivic, Structural and Formal Implications of Mixture in Chopin’s Mazurka Op. 30, No. 3,” South African Journal of Musicology 11 (1991), pp. 143–152Google Scholar
Witkowska-Zaremba, E., “Versification, Syntax and Form in Chopin’s Mazurkas,” trans. Pilatowicz, M., Polish Music Journal 3 (2000)Google Scholar
Witten, N. D., “The Chopin Ballades: An Analytical Study,” D.M.A. dissertation, Boston University, 1979Google Scholar
Witten, N. D., “The Coda Wagging the Dog: Tails and Wedges in the Chopin Ballades,” in Nineteenth-Century Piano Music: Essays in Performance and Analysis, ed. Witten, D., New York: Garland, 1997, pp. 117–185Google Scholar
Ya Deau, W. R., “Tonal and Formal Structure in Selected Larger Works of Chopin,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, 1980Google Scholar
Yih, A., “Connecting Analysis and Performance: Practical Issues for Developing an Effective Approach; A Case Study,” in Chopin in Paris: The 1830s, ed. Szklener, A., Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Fryderyka Chopina, 2006, pp. 215–236Google Scholar
Yip, J, “Tonal and Formal Aspects of Selected Mazurkas of Chopin,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 2010Google Scholar