Book contents
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Love, literature, and philosophy
- Chapter 2 The subjects of personification and personhood
- Chapter 3 Mothers, sons, and metaphysics: others’ agency and self-identity in the Roman Stoic notion of a person
- Chapter 4 Girl behind the woman: Cicero and Tullia, Lucretius and the life of the body-mind
- Chapter 5 Embodied persons and bodies personified: the phenomenology of perspectives in Seneca, Ep. 121
- Chapter 6 Nature’s property in On Duties 1: the feminine communism of Cicero’s radical aesthetics
- Conclusion: repairing the text
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
Book contents
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Love, literature, and philosophy
- Chapter 2 The subjects of personification and personhood
- Chapter 3 Mothers, sons, and metaphysics: others’ agency and self-identity in the Roman Stoic notion of a person
- Chapter 4 Girl behind the woman: Cicero and Tullia, Lucretius and the life of the body-mind
- Chapter 5 Embodied persons and bodies personified: the phenomenology of perspectives in Seneca, Ep. 121
- Chapter 6 Nature’s property in On Duties 1: the feminine communism of Cicero’s radical aesthetics
- Conclusion: repairing the text
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Personification and the Feminine in Roman Philosophy , pp. 256 - 293Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Primary Sources
Adams, C., and Tannery., P. (1897–1909) Oeuvres de Descartes. 11 vols. Paris. [Abbreviated AT.]Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Edited with prolegomena, critical apparatus, translation, and commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brown, R. D. (1987) Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Naturae iv, 1030–1287. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougan, T. W. (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tuscularum Disputationum Libri Quinque, Vol. i, Books 1 and 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1925) Lucrèce, De rerum natura; commentaire exégétique et critique, Vol. i. Paris.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002a) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book 2, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goetz, G., and Schoel, F., eds. (1910) M. Terenti Varronis De Lingua Latina Quae Supersunt. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S., Russell, D., and Innes., D. (1999) Aristotle: Poetics; Demeterius: On the Sublime; Longinus: On Style. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Keulen, A. J. (2001) L. Annaeus Seneca Troades: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, W., and Smith., S. (1942) T. Lucretius Cari: De Rerum Natura. Edited with a commentary and introduction. Madison.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Bastianini., G. (1992) Ierocle. In Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, Vol. i. Florence. 268–441.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley., D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. [Abbreviated LS.]Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1918) Tusculanae Disputationes. In Marci Tullii Ciceronis Scripta Quae Manserunt Omnia. Fasc. 44. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. (2006) Cicero: De Re Publica; De Legibus; Cato Maior De Senectute; Laelius De Amicitia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1965) Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Edited by Reynolds., L. D. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1977) Lucii Annaei Senecae Dialogorum Libri Duodecim. Oxford Classical Texts.Google Scholar
Rhys Roberts, W. (1910) Demetrius on Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De Elocutione. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1977) Propertius, Elegies I–IV. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Norman.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1999) On the Sublime. In Halliwell, Russell, and Innes 1999, 143–307.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. (1967 [1795]) On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Edited by Wilkinson, E. M. and Willoughby., L. A. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stroebel, E. (1915) De Inventione. In Marci Tullii Ciceronis Scripta Quae Manserunt Omnia. Fasc. 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. S. (1997) Catullus. Edited with a Textual and Interpretive Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Thulin, C. (1971) Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum, Opusculum Agrimensorum Veterum. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Von Arnim, H. (1903–5) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 3 vols. Leipzig. [Abbreviated SVF.]Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. S. (1903) Cicero: Rhetorica, Vol. ii: Brutus; Orator; De Optimo Genere Oratorum; Partitiones Oratoriae; Topica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1994) Cicero: De Officiis. Edited by Winterbottom., M. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (1970) Marci Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Libri Duodecim. Edited by Winterbottom., Michael 2 vols. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wisse, J., Winterbottom, M., and Fantham., E. (2008) M. Tullius Cicero: De Oratore Libri III. A Commentary on Book i3, 96–230. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (1991) On Stoic Good and Evil: De Finibus 3 and Paradoxa Stoicorum. Warminster.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Abrams, M. H. (1953) The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1991) “On Lyric Poetry and Society.” In Notes to Literature, Vol. i. New York. 37–54.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1998) “On Subject and Object.” In Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York. 245–59.Google Scholar
Alberti, A. (1995) “The Epicurean Theory of Law and Justice.” In Laks and Schofield 1995, 160–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K. (1997) “Lucretius and the Epicurean Other.” In Algra, Koenen, and Shrijvers 1997, 141–50.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2003) “The Mechanism of Social Appropriation and its Role in Hellenistic Ethics.” OSAP 25, 265–97.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., eds. (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Koenen, M. H., and Shrijvers, P. J., eds. (1997) Lucretius and his Intellectual Background. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2005) “The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology.” In Frede and Inwood 2005, 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allewaert, M. (2013) Ariel’s Ecology: Plantations, Personhood, and Colonialism in the American Tropics. Minneapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpers-Gölz, R. (1976) Der Begriff Σκοπός in der Stoa und seine Vorgeschichte. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Alston, R., and Spentzou., E. (2011) Reflections of Romanity: Discourses of Subjectivity in Imperial Rome. Columbus.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1970) “Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’état: Notes pour une recherche.” La pensée 151, 3–38.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (2006) Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978–(1987). London.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2008a) “How to Interpret Cicero’s Dialogue on Divination.” Interpretation 35.2, 105–23.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2008b) “Tullia’s Secret Shrine: Birth and Death in Cicero’s de Finibus.” AP 28, 373–93.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2009) “Womanly Humanism in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations.” TAPA 139, 411–45.Google Scholar
Altman, W. (2010) “The Truly False Basis of Cicero’s Platonism.” McNeese Review 40, 37–56.Google Scholar
Andreau, J., and Bruhns., H. (1990a) “Introduction.” In Andreau and Bruhns 1990b, vii–xxii.Google Scholar
Andreau, J., and Bruhns, H., eds. (1990b) Parenté et strategies familials dans l’antiquité romaine. Rome.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1989) “Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property.” In Griffin and Barnes 1989, 151–73.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies: étude sur les images de Séneèque. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1991) “La métaphore et l’abstraction dans la prose de Sénèque.” In Hijmans and Grimal 1991, 99–131.Google Scholar
Arweiler, A., and Möller, M., eds. (2008) Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit/Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., and Tiffin, H., eds. (1995) The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990) “Seneca’s ‘On the Happy Life’ and Stoic Individualism.” Apeiron 23.4, 219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1995) “Philodemus on Censorship, Moral Utility, and Formalism in Poetry.” In Obbink 1995, 148–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (2004) “The State as a Partnership: Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica in His Work On the State.” History of Political Thought 25, 569–98.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2005) “A New Kind of Model: Cicero’s Roman Constitution in De Republica.” AJP 126, 377–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (2009) “Seneca on Fortune and the Kingdom of God.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 115–38.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1988) “Hand over First: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric.” Classical Quarterly 38.2, 392–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, C. (2005) “Lucretius on what Language is not.” In Frede and Inwood 2005, 101–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. M., and Vidal-Naquet., P. (1977) Economic and Social History of Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Axtell, H. L. (1907) The Deification of Abstract Ideas in Roman Literature and Inscriptions. Chicago.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (2009) “On the Aporias of Marxian Politics: From Civil War to Class Struggle.” Diacritics 39.2, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hansen, R. L., eds. (1989) Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2013a) “Cicero’s Consolatio ad se: Character, Purpose and Impact of a Curious Treatise.” In Baltussen 2013b, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H., ed. (2013b) Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and its Afterlife. Swansea.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005) “Lane-Switching and Jughandles in Contemporary Interpretations of Roman Poetry.” TAPA 135, 135–62.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S., eds. (2004) Rituals in Ink: A Conference on Religion and Literary Production in Ancient Rome. Munich.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A., and Scheidel, W., eds. (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, R. (2003) “A Puzzle in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24, 303–40.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1970) “To Write – An Intransitive Verb?” In Macksey and Donato 1970, 134–45.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1988) “The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-Mémoire.” In The Semiotic Challenge. Berkeley. 11–94.Google Scholar
Bartky, S. (1990) Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2009) “Senecan Metaphor and Stoic Self-Instruction.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 190–217.Google Scholar
Basson, A. F., and Dominik, W., eds. (2003) Literature, Art, History. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Long., A. A. (1992) “Hierocles.” In Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini 1, Vol. i. Florence. 268–51.Google Scholar
Behrends, O. (1998) “Der römische Weg zur Subjektivität: Vom Siedlungsgenossen zu Person und Personlichkeit.” In Fetz, Hagenbüchle, and Schulz 1998, 204–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatouïl, T. (2003) “Deux usage de Stoïcisme: Deleuze, Foucault.” In Gros and Lévy 2003, 17–49.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser., N. (1995) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010) “A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to a New Materialism.” In Coole and Frost 2010, 47–69.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1946) “Relationship of Persons in the Verb.” In Benveniste 1971, 195–204.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1958b) “Categories of Thought and Language.” In Benveniste 1971, 55–64.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1969) Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Berger, H. (2005) Situated Utterances: Texts, Bodies, and Cultural Representations. New York.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2010) “Beauty and its Relation to Goodness in Stoicism.” In Sedley and Nightingale 2010, 130–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. (2000) Le orrechie di Hermes: Studi di antropologia e letterature classiche. Turin.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2011) The Ears of Hermes: Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World. Columbus.Google Scholar
Bianchi, E. (2014) The Feminine Symptom: Aleatory Matter in the Aristotelian Cosmos. New York.Google Scholar
Black, J. (1998) “Taking the Sex out of Sexuality: Foucault’s Failed History.” In Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998, 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, M. W. (1963) “A Grammatical Approach to Personification Allegory.” Modern Philology 60.3, 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1997) “Prospect for a Theory of Nonconceptuality.” In Shipwreck with Spectator: Paradigm for a Metaphor of Existence. Cambridge. 81–102.Google Scholar
Blundell, M. W. (1990) “Parental Nature and Stoic Οίκείωσις.” Ancient Philosophy 10, 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, M., and Helmig, C., eds. (2007) Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven.Google Scholar
Bonte, P., and Copet-Rougier., E. (1990) “Groupes de parenté et strategies matrimoniales.” In Andreau and Bruhns 1990b, 253–66.Google Scholar
Bordo, S. (1987) The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991) “Introduction à la socioanalyse.” Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 90, 3–5.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2003) “Participant Objectivation.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9, 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G., ed. (2003) Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K. (1986a) “Wet-Nursing at Rome: A Study in Social Relations.” In Rawson 1987, 201–29.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (1994) “The Nurse and the Child at Rome: Duty, Affect and Socialisation.” Thamyris 1.2, 137–56.Google Scholar
Braund, S., and Gill, C., eds. (1997) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad. (2005b) “Brennan on Mitsis on Long.” Southern Journal of Philosophy. Special Supplement 43, 250–6.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1956) “Οἰκείωσις and Οἰκειότης: Theophrastus and Zeno on Nature in Moral Theory.” Phronesis 1, 123–45.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. (2012) Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1961) “Aspects of the Christianization of the Roman Aristocracy.” JRS 51, 1–11.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1988) The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2012) Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD. Princeton.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (1994) “‘Supposing Truth Were a Woman … ’: Plato’s Subversion of Masculine Discourse.” In Tuana 1994, 157–80.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) “The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism.” In Schofield and Striker 1986, 113–44.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994a) “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Trans. Lloyd., J. Cambridge. 92–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994b) “On a Stoic Way of Not Being.” In Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Trans. Lloyd., J. Cambridge. 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J., and Nussbaum, M., eds. (1993) Passions and Perceptions. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, V., Hewson, J., and Rose, S., eds. (2009) Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1982) “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” Philosophical Review 91, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1995) “Contingent Foundations.” In Benhabib, Butler, Cornell, and Fraser 1995, 35–58.Google Scholar
Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Žižek., S. (2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London.Google Scholar
Butler, S., and Purves, A., eds. (2013) Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses. Abingdon.Google Scholar
Cabisius, G. (1984) “Social Metaphor and the Atomic Cycle of Lucretius.” CJ 80, 109–20.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1977) “Paganism and Literature in Late Fourth Century Rome.” In Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en occident. Vandoeuvres. 1–30.Google Scholar
Cancik-Lindemaier., (1998) “Seneca’s Collection of Epistles: A Medium of Philosophical Communication.” In Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture: Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz. Edited by A. Y. Collins., Atlanta. 88–109.Google Scholar
Carrithers, M., Collins, S., and Lukes, S., eds. (1985) The Category of the Person. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cassell, J. (1977) A Group Called Women: Sisterhood and Symbolism in the Feminist Movement. New York.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (1997) “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” The Philosophical Review 106, 309–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (1999) “Something and Nothing: The Stoic on Concepts of Universals.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17, 145–214.Google Scholar
Cavarero, A. (1995) In Spite of Plato: A Feminist Rewriting of Ancient Philosophy. New York.Google Scholar
Cavarero, A. (2011) “Inclining the Subject: Ethics, Alterity, and Natality.” In Elliott and Attridge 2011, 194–204.Google Scholar
Celentano, M. S., Chiron, P., and Noël, M.-P., eds. (2004) “Skhèma/Figura”: formes et figures chez les anciens: rhétorique, philosophie, littérature. Paris.Google Scholar
Centlivres Challet, C.-E. (2013) Like Man, Like Woman: Roman Women, Gender Qualities and Conjugal Relationships at the Turn of the First Century. Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, J.-M. (1999) Displaced Persons: The Literature of Exile from Cicero to Boethius. Madison.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (1996) “‘The Bright Frontier of Friendship’: Augustine and the Christian Body as Frontier.” In Mathisen and Sivan 1996, 217–29.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (1998) “The Old Adam: The Fathers and the Unmaking of Masculinity.” In Foxhall and Salmon 1998, 170–82.Google Scholar
Clark, G., and Rajak, T., eds. (2002) Philosophy and Power in the Greco-Roman World. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, B. (1999) “Lucretius’ Erotic Mother: Maternity as a Poetic Construct in De Rerum Natura.” Helios 26, 69–84.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. M., and Keyt., D. (1992) “Analysing Plato’s Arguments: Plato and Platonism.” In Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues. Edited by J. C. Klagg and N. D. Smith. Oxford. 173–200.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (2005) “Pre-Modern Property and Self-Ownership before Locke: Or, When Did Common Decency Become a Private rather than a Public Virtue?” European Journal of Political Theory 4, 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. (2004) “Mapping the Boundary of the Known and the Unknown.” In Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens 2004, 161–8.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007a) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007b) “Virile Tongues: Rhetoric and Masculinity.” In Dominik and Hall 2007, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, C. (2012) “Quotquot haec legerint meminerint: All Who Read This Will Remember.” MLN 127.5, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D., and Frost, S., eds. (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2004) Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015) Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Corcoran, K. J., ed. (2001) Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons. Ithaca.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. (1984–1991) Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vols. i–ii. Cambridge. [Abbreviated CSM 1 or 2.]Google Scholar
Craik, E. M., ed. (1990) “Owls to Athens”: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1986b) “Feminine Inadequacy and the Senatusconsultum Velleianum.” In Rawson 1986a, 83–92.Google Scholar
Crystal, I. M. (2002) Self-Intellection and its Epistemological Origins in Ancient Greek Thought. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1985) “Philosophy as/and/of Literature.” In Rajchman and West 1985, 65–83.Google Scholar
Dasen, V. and Späth, T., eds. (2010) Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, I., and Sullivan, P., eds. (1994) Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (1945) “The Stoic Categories as Methodological Principles.” TAPA 76, 246–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pretis, A. (2003) “‘Insincerity,’ ‘Facts,’ and ‘Epistolarity’: Approaches to Pliny’s Epistles to Culpurnia.” Arethusa 36.2, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (2012) “Le città personificate nella Roma repubblicana: fenomenologia di un motivo letterario tra retorica e poesia.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 215–47.Google Scholar
Delphy, C. (1993) “Rethinking Sex and Gender.” Women’s Studies International Forum 16.1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, M., and Obbink, D., eds. (2000b) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1966) “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” In Derrida 1978, 278–93.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1971) “White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy.” In Derrida 1982, 207–72.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1987) “My Chances/Mes chances: A Rendezvous with Some Epicurean Stereophonies.” In Psyche, Vol. i. Stanford. 344–76.Google Scholar
Detel, W. (2005) Foucault and Classical Antiquity: Power, Ethics and Knowledge. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M., and Vernant., J.-P. (1978) Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Chicago.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, C. (1996) “Autonomy in the Light of Difference.” In Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory. Edited by Hirschmann, Di Stefano. 95–116.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Long., A. A. (1988a) “Introduction.” In Dillon and Long 1988b: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J., and Long, A. A., eds. (1988b) The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, S. (1984) “Infirmitas Sexus: Womanly Weakness in Roman Law.” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedeneis/Legal History Journal 52, 343–71.Google Scholar
Dixon, S. (2004) “Exemplary Housewife or Luxurious Slut? Cultural Representations of Women in the Roman Economy.” In McHardy and Marshall 2004, 56–74.Google Scholar
Dominik, W., ed. (1997) Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. New York.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C., and Kurke., L. (1993) “Introduction.” In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics. Cambridge. 1–19.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) “Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations.” In Powell 1995b, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, S., and McFarlane, B.. (2013) “Defining Property Rights.” In Penner and Smith 2013b, 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dozier, C. (2014) “Quintilian’s Ratio Discendi (Institutio Oratoria 12.8) and the Rhetorical Dimension of the Institutio Oratoria.” Arethusa 47, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A. (2011) “The Sophist and the Swarm: Feminism, Platonism and Ancient Philosophy in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon.” Ramus 40.1, 33–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A. (2012) “‘You Must Change Your Life’: Metaphor and Exemplum, Theory and Practice, in Seneca’s Prose.” Helios 39.2, 145–92.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. (2013a) “Oedipus on Oedipus: Sophocles, Seneca, Politics, and Therapy.” In Ormand 2012, 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A. (2013b) “Poetics of Conspiracy and Hermeneutics of Suspicion in Tacitus’s Dialogus de Oratoribus.” CA 32.1, 1–34.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. (2015) “Cicero’s Quarrels: Reception and Modernity from Horace to Tacitus.” In Altman 2015, 144–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J., Honig, B., and Phillips, A., eds. (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrueil, L. (2011) “Literature after Theory: Or, the Intellective Turn.” In Elliott and Attridge 2011, 237–48.Google Scholar
Duby, G., and Perrot, N., eds. (1992) A History of Women in the West: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2001) “Preventing Ciceronianism: C. Licinius Calvus’ Regimens for Sexual and Oratorical Self-Mastery.” CP 96.4, 400–28.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutsch, D. (2008) Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echols, A. (1989) Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967–1975. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997) “Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca’s Letters.” Greece and Rome 44, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. (2009) Free Yourself! Slavery, Freedom and the Self in Seneca’s Letters. In Bartsch and Wray (eds.) 2009, 139–59.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. (1997) “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103.2, 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990a) The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis: Moral Development and Social Interaction in Early Stoic Philosophy. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990b) “Stoic Philosophy and the Concept of the Person.” In Gill 1990c, 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S., and Whiting, J., eds. (1996) Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ernout, A., and Meillet., A. (1951). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue Latine. Paris.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1997) “Cicero and the Expression of Grief.” In Braund and Gill 1997, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, R. (2011) “The Person and Human Life.” In Elliott and Attridge 2011, 205–19.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1991b) “The Objective Appearance of Pyrrhonism.” In Everson 1991a, 121–47.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1999) “Epicurean Psychology.” In Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield 1999, 542–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (2001) Latin Language and Latin Culture: From Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A., ed. (2009) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, S. (1973) “‘You were right to leave, Arthur Rimbaud’: Poetry and Modernity.” In Felman 2007, 79–107.Google Scholar
Felman, S. (2007) The Claims of Literature. Edited by Sun, E., Peretz, E., and Baer., U. New York.Google Scholar
Fetz, R., Hagenbüchle, R., and Schulz, P., eds. (1998) Geschichte und Vorgeschichte der modernen Subjektivität, Bd. 1. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, H., Hiltman, G., Olkowski, D., and Reichold, A., eds. (2007) The Other: Feminist Reflections in Ethics. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiévez, M. (1953) “‘Opera peregrinationis huius’ ou les étapes de la composition du De Officiis.” Latomus 12.3, 261–74.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2000) “Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?” The Philosophical Review 109.2, 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (2003) “Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern: The Cyrenaics, Sextus, and Descartes.” In Miller and Inwood 2003, 192–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M. I. (1968) “The Silent Women of Ancient Rome.” In Aspects of Antiquity. London. 129–42.Google Scholar
Flaschenriem, B. L. (1998) “Speaking of Women: ‘Female Voice’ in Propertius.” Helios 25.1, 46–64.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I., ed. (2004) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, T., and Lee, M., eds. (2009) Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forschner, M. (1981) Die stoische Ethik: Über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprach-, und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W., ed. (1983) On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics: The Work of Arius Didymus. New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality, Vol. i. Trans. Hurley., Robert New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1983) “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Edited by Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow., P. Chicago. 208–28.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1985) The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality, Vol. ii. Trans. Hurley., Robert New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986) The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality, Vol. iii. Trans. Hurley., Robert New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994c) “The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Foucault 1994e, 281–301.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994d) “Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations.” In Foucault 1994e, 111–19.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–1982. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. (1989) “Lucretius on Politics and History.” In Griffin and Barnes 1989, 120–50.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1994) “Postmodernism, Romantic Irony, and Classical Closure.” In De Jong and Sullivan 1994, 231–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002a) Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book 2, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002b) “The Feminine Principle: Gender in the De rerum natura.” In Fowler 2002a, 444–52.Google Scholar
Foxhall, L., and Salmon, J., eds. (1998) Thinking Men: Masculinity and its Self-Representations in the Classical Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Franchi, P. (2012) “Comminus portenta notare. Pretesa di realtà e crogiolo d’immaginari: il laboratorio allegorico della Psychomachia.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 341–53.Google Scholar
Frank, J. (2005) A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Work of Politics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” The Journal of Philosophy 68, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. (1999) “Autonomy, Necessity, and Love.” In Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge. 129–41.Google Scholar
Fraser, N., and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political Philosophical Exchange. London.Google Scholar
Frede, D., and Inwood, B., eds. (2005) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 172–93.Google Scholar
Frei-Stolba, R., Bielman, A., and Bianchi, O., eds. (2003) Les femmes antiques entre sphère privée et sphère publique. Bern.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1953–1974), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. London. [Abbreviated SE.]Google Scholar
Fricker, M., and Hornsby, J., eds. (2000) The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1986) “Autonomy and the Split-Level Self.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24.1, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1998) “Feminism, Autonomy, and Emotion.” In Haber and Halfon 1998, 37–45.Google Scholar
Froman, W. (2005) “Merleau-Ponty and the Relations between the Logos Prophorikos and the Logos Endiathetos.” Analecta Husserliana 88, 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. (1979) “Persona, ein römische Rollenbegriff.” In Marquard and Stierle 1979, 83–106.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C., and Greenblatt, S.. (2000) Practicing New Historicism. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamel, M.-K. (1998) “Reading as a Man: Performance and Gender in Roman Elegy.” Helios 25.1, 79–95.Google Scholar
Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersh, S. (1986) Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition, Vol. i. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Gersh, S., and Moran, D., eds. (2006) Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., and Morrison, A.. (2007) “Introduction: What is a Letter?” In Morello and Morrison 2007, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1985) “Ancient Psychotherapy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46, 307–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, C. (1988) “Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6, 169–200.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1994) “Peace of Mind and Being Yourself: Panaetius to Plutarch.” ANRW 2.36.7, 4599–640.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2008) “The Self and Hellenistic-Roman Philosophical Therapy.” In Arweiler and Möller 2008, 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. (2009) “Seneca and Selfhood: Integration and Disintegration.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 65–83.Google Scholar
Gillespie, S., and Hardie, P., eds. (2007) Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) “Probabile, veri simile and Related Terms.” In Powell 1995b, 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, B. (1993) “‘But Ariadne Was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry.” In Rabinowitz and Richlin 1993, 75–101.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. (2009) The Seeds of Things: Theorizing Sexuality and Materiality in the Renaissance. New York.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. (2000) “Socrates on Loving One’s Own: A Traditional Concept of Philia Radically Transformed.” CP 95, 379–98.Google Scholar
Goulon, A. (1972) “La malheure de l’homme à naissance.” Revue des etudes augustinienne 18, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. (1998) “The Manhandling of Maecenas: Senecan Abstractions of Masculinity.” TAPA 119. 4, 607–32.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1990) “Aristotelian Rhetoric, Dialectic, and the Traditions of the Ἀντίστροφος.” Rhetorica 8.1, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E. (1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Greene, E., ed. (1996b) Re-Reading Sappho: Reception and Transmission. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. (1988) “Philosophy for Statesmen: Cicero and Seneca.” Gymnasium 9, 133–50.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995) “Philosophical Badinage in Cicero’s Letters to his Friend.” In Powell 1995b, 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. T., and Barnes, J., (2003) “De Beneficiis and Roman Society.” JRS 93, 92–113.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1992c) “Le vocabulaire de l’intériorité dans l’oeuvre philosophique de Sénèque.” In Grimal 1992a, 141–60.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1992d) “La langue latine, langue de la philosophie.” In Grimal 1992a, 335–46.Google Scholar
Grosz, E. (2010) “Feminism, Materialism, and Freedom.” In Coole and Frost (eds.) 2010, 139–57.Google Scholar
Gualandri, I., and Mazzoli, G., eds. (2003) Gli Annei: Una famiglia nella storia e nella cultura di Roma imperiale. Como.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1972) “The Classical Doctrine of Politics in Relation to Social Philosophy.” In Theory and Practice. Boston. 41–81.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (1991) “Towards a History of Friendly Advice: The Politics of Candor in Cicero’s de Amicitia.” Apeiron 23, 165–85.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N., and Schiesaro, A., eds. (1997a) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N., and Schiesaro, A.. (1997b) “Introduction.” In Habinek and Schiesaro 1997a, xv–xxi.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1979) “Les divisions de la philosophie dans l’antiquité.” Museum Helveticum 36, 201–23.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Malden.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (1984b) “The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-Cultural Feminism.” In Peradotto and Sullivan 1984, 241–62.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (1989) “Women as Same and Other in Classical Roman Elite.” Helios 16.1, 59–78.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (1997) “Female Homoeroticism and the Denial of Roman Reality in Latin Literature.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 255–73.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (2004) “Matriot Games: Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, and the Forming of Family-Oriented Roman Values.” In McHardy and Marshall 2004, 26–39.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (2006–2007) “Sulpica and her ‘Fama’: An Intertextual Approach to Recovering her Latin Literary Image.” CW 100.1, 37–42.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. (2009) “Corpus erat: Sulpicia’s Elegiac Text and Body in Ovid’s Pygmalion Narrative (Metamorphoses 10.238–97)” In Fögen and Lee 2009, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, D. (2008) Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988) “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14.3, 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991) “‘Gender’ for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word.” In Cyborgs, Simians, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London. 127–48.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1991) “Who Knows?: Identities and Feminist Epistemology.” In (En)Gendering Knowledge: Feminists in Academe. Edited by Hartman, J. and Messer-Davidow, E.. Knoxville. 100–15.Google Scholar
Harich, H. (1994) “Zu Seneca, Ep. 104, Tacitus, Ann. XV, 60, 2–64 und Montaigne, Essay II, 35.” Latomus 53.2, 354–65.Google Scholar
Harlow, M. (1998) “In the Name of the Father: Procreation, Paternity and Patriarchy.” In Foxhall and Salmon 1998, 155–69.Google Scholar
Harlow, M., and Laurence, R.. (2002) Growing Up and Growing Old in Ancient Rome: A Life Course Approach. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S., ed. (2001) Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, R. A., and Sheppard, A., eds. (2010) Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato. London.Google Scholar
Hartsock, N. (1990) “Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?” Feminism/Postmodernism. Edited by L. Nicholson. 157–76.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1992 [1816]) The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part 1 of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusatze. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963) Le Vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. (1999) Matrona docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2005) Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J., Fowler, P. J., and Harrison, S. J., eds. (2007) Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijmans, B. L., and Grimal, P., eds. (1991) Sénèque et la prose latine: neuf exposés suivis de discussions. Vandoeuvres.Google Scholar
Hindness, B., and Hirst, P. Q.. (1977) Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-Critique of Pre-Capitalist Modes of Production. Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. (2001) “Cinna, Statius, and ‘Immanent Literary History’ in the Cultural Economy.” In Schmidt 2001, 221–57.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (2007) “Ovid among the Conspiracy Theorists.” In Heyworth, Fowler, and Harrison 2007, 194–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. (2005) “Daedala Lingua: Crafted Speech in De Rerum Natura.” AJP 126.4, 527–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. (2012) “Deleuze, Lucretius, and the Simulacrum of Nature.” In Holmes and Shearin 2012, 316–41.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. (2013) “The Poetic Logic of Negative Exceptionalism in Lucretius, Book 5.” In Lehoux, Morrison, and Sharrock 2013, 153–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1998–1999) “Four Poets and a Poetess or a Portrait of the Poet as a Young Man? Thoughts on Book 3 of the ‘Corpus Tibullianum.’” CJ 94.2, 169–91.Google Scholar
Honig, B. (2010) “Antigone’s Two Laws: Greek Tragedy and the Politics of Humanism.” NLH 41.1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houdt, T., Partoens, G., and Roskan, G.. (2004) “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Virtus.” In Partoens, Roskam, and Houdt 2004, 1–26.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970 [1931]) Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Hague.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993) “The Stoic Division in Philosophy.” Phronesis 38, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperio, O. (2012) “Personificazioni dell’arte poetica e metafore parentali: La maternità letteraria tra commedia e filosofia.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 29–51.Google Scholar
Innes, D., Hine, H., Pelling, C. and Russell, D. A., eds. (1995) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (1983) “Comments on Professor Görgemanns’ Paper: The Two Forms of Oikeiosis in Arius and the Stoa.” In Fortenbaugh 1983, 190–201.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1984) “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century A.D.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2, 151–84.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1986) “Goal and Target in Stoicism.” The Journal of Philosophy 83, 547–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007b) “The Importance of Form in Seneca’s Philosophical Letters.” In Morello and Morrison 2007, 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B., and Donini, P.. (1999) “Stoic Ethics.” In Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield 1999, 675–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1989) “Ierocle Stoico: Oikeiosis e doveri sociali.” ANRW 36.3, 2201–2226.Google Scholar
Jaffro, L. (2003) “Foucault et le stoïcisme: sur l’historiographie de L’hemeneutique du sujet.” In Gros and Lévy 2003, 51–83.Google Scholar
Jaggar, A. (1977) “Political Philosophies of Women’s Liberation.” In Feminism and Philosophy. Edited by M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. A. Elliston, and J. English. Totowa. 5–21.Google Scholar
James, S. (2010) “‘Ipsa dixerat’: Women’s Words in Roman Love Elegy.” Pheonix 64, 314–44.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (2005) Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London.Google Scholar
Janan, M. W. (1994) When the Lamp is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Illinois.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1995) “Reconstructing Philodemus’ On Poems.” In Obbink 1995, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, H. R. (2005) “Modernity and Literary Tradition.” Critical Inquiry 31, 329–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen-Wigelsworth, A. (2013) “Political Bedfellows: Tullia, Dolabella, and Caelius.” Arethusa 46, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. R. (2013) “Nature, Spontaneity, and Voluntary Action in Lucretius.” In Lehoux, Morrison, and Sharrock 2013, 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshel, S. (1986) “Nurturing the Master’s Child: Slavery and the Roman Child-Nurse.” Signs 12.1, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshel, S. (1992) “The Body Female and the Body Politic: Livy’s Lucretia and Verginia.” In Richlin 1992b, 112–30.Google Scholar
Joshel, S., and Murnaghan, S., eds. (1998a) Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations. London.Google Scholar
Joshel, S., and Murnaghan, S.. (1998b) “Introduction: Differential Equations.” In Joshel and Murnaghan 1998a, 1–23.Google Scholar
Judovitz, D. (1988) Subjectivity and Representation in Descartes: The Origins of Modernity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Just, R. (1985) “Freedom, Slavery, and the Female Psyche.” In Crux: Essays Presented to G.E.M. de St. Croix on his 75th Birthday. Edited by Cartledge, P. and Harvey, F.. Exeter. 169–88.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1988) “Discovering the Will: From Aristotle to Augustine.” In Dillon and Long 1988b, 234–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kany-Turpin, J. (1999) “Les conceptions de la nature chez Lucrèce.” In Cusset 1999, 91–102.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. (2011) Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapust, D. (2015) “Rethinking Rousseau’s Tyranny of Orators: Cicero’s On Duties and the Beauty of True Glory.” In The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept. Edited by Farr, J. and Williams, D.. Cambridge. 175–96.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2002) “The Taxonomy of Patience, or When Is ‘Patientia’ Not a Virtue?” Classical Philology 97.2, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2005) Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, R. (2000) “Red Kant, or The Persistence of the Third Critique in Adorno and Jameson.” Critical Inquiry 26, 682–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1997) “Tandem venit amor: A Roman Woman Speaks of Love.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 295–310.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2002) Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J. (2004) “Nocturnal Writers in Imperial Rome: The Culture of Lucubratio.” CP 99, 209–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J. (2006) “Seneca, Man of Many Genres.” In Volk and Williams 2006, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J. (2009b) “Seneca on Self-Examination: Rereading De ira 3.36.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 160–87.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1972) “The Search for Personal Identity in Stoic Thought.” Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 55, 177–96.Google Scholar
Keuls, E. (1991) “The Feminist View of the Past: A Comment on the ‘Decentering’ of the Poems of Ovid.” Helios 17.2, 221–35.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1990) “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy 21, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1993) Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E. F. (1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Dependency, and Equality. New York.Google Scholar
Klagge, J., and Smith, N. D., eds. (1992) “Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues”, OSAP, Suppl. Vol. ii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Klimchuck, D. (2013) “Property and Necessity.” In Penner and Smith 2013b, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2001) Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago.Google Scholar
Kühner, R., and Stegmann, C.. (1914) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Hannover. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Kurke, L., and Dougherty, C.. (1998) “Introduction.” In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece. Edited by L. Kurke and C. Dougherty. Oxford. 1–14.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1953) “Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage en analyse.” In Lacan 1971, 237–322.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (1996) “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony.” In Mouffe 1996, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, R. (2004) “A Woman’s Influence on a Roman Text: Marcia and Seneca.” In McHardy and Marshall 2004, 115–26.Google Scholar
Larmour, D., Miller, P. A., and Platter, C., eds. (1998) Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lateiner, D., Gold, B., and Perkins, J., eds. (2013) Roman Literature, Gender, and Reception: Domina Illustris. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1969) “De Exemplo meo Ipse Aedificato: An Organizing Idea in the Mostellaria.” Hermes 97, 318–32.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (2002) “Love’s Authority.” In Contours of Agency: Essays in Honor of Harry Frankfurt. Edited by Buss, S.. Cambridge. 279–92.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-U. (2002) Oikeiosis: Stoische Ethik in naturphilosphischer Perspektive. Freiburg.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D., and Sharrock, A., eds. (2013) Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentricchia, F. (1989) “Foucault’s Legacy: A New Historicism?” In Veeser 1989, 231–42.Google Scholar
Lesses, G. (1993) “Austere Friends: The Stoics and Friendship.” Apeiron 26.1, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leumann, M., Hoffmann, J., and Szantyr, A.. (1963) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1984) “La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres II et IV de De finibus.” REL 62, 111–27.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1989) “Le De Officiis dans l’oeuvre philosophique de Cicéron.” Via Latina 116, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992a) Cicero Academicus: Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992b) “Cicéron créateur du vocabulaire latin de la connaissance.” In Grimal 1992a, 91–106.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2003) “Y a-t-il quelqu’un derrière le masque? A propos de la théorie des personae chez Cicéron.” Qaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica 19, 127–40.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2004) “Les lumières de la rhétorique: les significations rhétorique, politique et philosophique des figures dans l’‘Orator».” In Celentano, Chiron, and Noël 2004, 229–41.Google Scholar
Lévy, C., Besnier, B., and Gigandet, A., eds. (2003) “Ars et ratio”: sciences, art et métiers dans la philosophie hellénistique et romaine. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. (1960) “Conscience and Conscious.” In Studies in Words. Cambridge. 181–213.Google Scholar
L’Hoir, F. S. (1992) The Rhetoric of Gender Terms: “Man”, “Woman”, and the Portrayal of Character in Roman Prose. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R. (1973–1974) “Roman Religion and Ethical Thought: Abstraction and Personification.” Classical Journal 69.2, 108–19.Google Scholar
Liveley, G. (2006) “Surfing the Third Wave? Postfeminism and the Hermeneutics of Reception.” In Martindale and Thomas 2006, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1964). “Nosce teipsum and Conscientia.” Arch. Gesch. Philos. 46, 188–200.Google Scholar
Loesberg, J. (2005) A Return to Aesthetics: Autonomy, Indifference, and Postmodernism. Stanford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewald, H. (1978) “Primary Process, Secondary Process, and Language.” In Loewald 1980, 178–206.Google Scholar
Loewald, H. (1976) “The Early Stoic Concept of Moral Choice.” In Images of Man in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Edited by Verbeke, G.. Leuven. 77–92.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995b) “Cicero’s Politics in De Officiis.” In Laks and Schofield 1995, 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1997) “Stoic Philosophers on Persons, Property-Ownership and Community.” BICS 41, 13–31.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2005) “Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus, and Augustine’s De dialectica.” In Frede and Inwood 2005, 36–55.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006) From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, T. A. (1965) “Strawson and the Pains of Others.” Australasian Journal of Philolsophy 43.1, 73–7.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2008) “Cicero on Caesar or Exemplum and Inability in the Brutus.” In Arweiler and Möller 2008, 131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2011) “Divided Voices and Imperial Identity in Propertius 4.1 and Derrida, Monolingualism of the Other and Politics of Friendship.” Dictynna 8.11 (online). Available at: http://dictynna.revues.org/711 (accessed September 30, 2013).Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (1986) “On the Distribution of Instrumental and Agent Markers for Human and non-Human Agents of Passive Verbs in Some Indo-European Languages.” Indogermanische Forshungen 91, 48–66.Google Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2003) On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, S. (2009) “The Origin of the Feminine Gender in Proto-Indo-European: An Old Problem in a New Perspective.” In Bubenik, Hewson, and Rose 2009, 3–13.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (2005) Before Imagination: Embodied Thought from Montaigne to Rousseau. Stanford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, K. (1998) “Servitium Amoris: Amor Servitii.” In Joshel and Murnaghan 1998a, 174–92.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (2000) Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, K. (2010) “First-Person Poetry.” In Barchiesi and Scheidel 2010, 435–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDuffie, F. (2007) “Augustine’s Rhetoric of the Feminine in the Confessions: Woman as Mother, Woman as Other.” In Stark 2007, 97–118.Google Scholar
McHardy, F., and Marshall, E., eds. (2004) Women’s Influence on Classical Civilization. London.Google Scholar
McInerney, J. (2003) “Plutarch’s Manly Women.” In Rosen and Sluiter 2003, 319–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, R. (1987) “The Methods of Rhetoric and Philosophy: Invention and Judgment.” In Rhetoric: Essays in Invention and Discovery. Woodbridge. 56–65.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (2006) “What is a Human Body?” In The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, Vol. i. Cambridge. 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1978b) “Liberal Democracy and Property.” In Macpherson 1978c, 199–207.Google Scholar
Macksey, R., and Donato, E., eds. (1970) The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G. (1991) L’οἰκείωσις peripatetica in Ario Didimo e nel ‘De finibus’ di Cicerone. Florence.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. (1990) “Making a Virtue of Perversity: The Poetry of Prudentius.” Ramus 19.1, 64–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaspina, E. (1996) “Arria Maggiore: una ‘donna virile’ nelle epistole di Plinio? (Ep. III, 16).” In De tuo tibi: omaggio degli allievi a Italo Lana. Bologna. 319–38.Google Scholar
Mann, W. R. (2000) The Discovery of Things: Aristotle’s Categories and their Context. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. E. (1973) “Seneca and the Stoics on the Equality of the Sexes.” Mnemosyne 26, 170–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C., and Thomas, R., eds. (2006) Classics and the Uses of Reception. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1975 [1844]). “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. 4, 1843–1844. Moscow. 299–348.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1976 [1845]) “Theses on Feuerbach.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. v: 1845–1847. Moscow. 3–9.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1986 [1857–8]) “Economic Manuscripts of 1857–58 (First Version of Capital).” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. xxviii. Moscow. 5–537.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1976 [1848]) “Manifesto for the Communist Party.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. vi. Moscow. 477–519.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1975 [1985–6]) The German Ideology. In Marx and Engels: Collected Works, Vol. v. Moscow. 19–585.Google Scholar
Mastrangelo, M. (2008) The Roman Self in Late Antiquity: Prudentius and the Poetics of the Soul. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrorosa, I. G. (2012) “La Fortuna Populi Romani e l’ascesa egemonica di Roma fra tradizione antica e riletture moderne.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 301–24.Google Scholar
Mathisen, R., and Sivan, H., eds. (1996) Shifting Frontiers in Late Antiquity. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1985) “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of a Person; the Notion of Self.” In Carrithers, Collins, and Lukes 1985, 1–25.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, G. (2000) “Le ‘Voci’ dei Dialoghi di Seneca.” In Seneca e il suo tempo: Atti del convegno internazionale di Roma-Cassino, 11–14 novembre (1998). Edited by Paronni, . Roma. 249–60.Google Scholar
Mehl, D. (1999) “The Intricate Translation of the Epicurean Doctrine of PSUKHH in Book 3 of Lucretius.” Philologus 143, 272–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. (1982) “Infancy, Parenting and Nourishment in Augustine’s Confessions.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 50, 349–64.Google Scholar
Miller, J., and Inwood, B., eds. (2003) Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1999) “Women, Identity, and Philosophy.” In Bianchi 1999, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1998) “Catullan Consciousness, the ‘Care of the Self,’ and the Force of the Negative in History.” In Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998, 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2001) “Why Propertius is a Woman: French Feminism and Augustan Elegy.” Classical Philology 96.2, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, K. (2002) “Sulpicia’s (Corpo)Reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tibullus] 3.13.” Classical Antiquity 21.2, 259–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1993) “Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura.” MD 31, 111–28.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1999) “The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights.” In Ierodiakonou 1999, 153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, P. (2005) “The Stoics on Property and Politics.” Southern Journal of Philosophy. Special Supplement 43, 230–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monet, A., ed. (2003) Le jardin romain: Epicurisme et poésie à Rome. Villaneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar
Morello, R., and Morrison, A. D.. (2007) Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, G. (2012) “Allegorie della Legge. Prosopopea delle legge e appello alle leggi personificate: un topos retorico (e le sue transformazione) dal Critone platonico alla tradizione declamatoria.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 53–119.Google Scholar
Moretti, G., and Bonandini, A., eds. (2012) Persona ficta: La personificazione allegorica nella cultura antica fra letteratura, retorica e iconografia. Trento.Google Scholar
Morford, M. (2002) The Roman Philosophers: From the Time of Cato the Censor to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. London.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1989) “The Stranger’s Stratagem: Self-Disclosure and Self-Sufficiency in Greek Culture.” JHS 109, 114–33.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2009) “The ‘New Sappho’ Reconsidered in the Light of the Athenian Reception of Sappho.” In The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues. Edited by Greene, E. and Skinner, M.. Washington. 176–99.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1998) The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E. (2008) “Republican Visions.” In Dryzek, Honig, and Phillips 2008, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R. J. (1989) “Cotidie meditare: Theory and Practice of the Meditatio in Imperial Stoicism.” ANRW 2.36.3, 1473–1517.Google Scholar
Newton, J. L. (1989) “History as Usual? Feminism and the ‘New Historicism.’” In Veeser 1989, 152–67.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H. (1990) “Delicia in Roman Literature and in the Urban Inscriptions.” ARID 19, 79–88.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W., and Sedley, D. N., eds. (2010) Ancient Models of Mind. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1985) Allegory and Poetics: The Structure and Imagery of Prudentius’ “Psychomachia.” Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Ausonius’ ‘Late Antique’ Poetics and ‘Post-Modern’ Literary Theory.” Ramus 19, 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1994) “Mater Matters: The Female in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura.” Colby Quarterly 30.3, 179–205.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001a) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001b) “Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero’s Problematic Legacy.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 54.3, 38–52.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) “The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman.” In Nussbaum and Sihvola 2002, 283–326.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M., and Sihvola, J., eds. (2002) The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. (1999) “The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City.” In Ierodiakonou 1999, 178–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehler, K. (1998) “Subjektivität und Selbstbewußtsein in der Antike.” In Fetz, Hagenbüchle, and Schulz 1998, 153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, S. M. (1998) “Gender, the Public and the Private.” In Feminism and Politics. Edited by Phillips, A.. Oxford. 116–41.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2009) Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006) Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1997) “The Teratogenic Grid”. In Roman Sexualities, edited by Judith P. Hallett and Marilyn B. Skinner. Princeton. 47–65.Google Scholar
Partoens, G., Roskam, G., and Houdt, T., eds. (2004) Virtutis Imago: Studies on the Conceptualisation of an Ancient Ideal. Louvain.Google Scholar
Pembroke, S. G. (1971) “Oikeiosis.” In Problems in Stoicism. Edited by Long, A. A.. London. 114–49.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E., and Smith, H. E.. (2013a) “Introduction.” In Penner and Smith 2013b, xv–xxvii.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E., and Smith, H. E., eds. (2013b) Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdatto, J., and Sullivan, J.P., eds. (1984) Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers. Albany.Google Scholar
Perin, Y. Y., and Croisille, J.-M., eds. (2002) Neronia VI; Rome à l’époque néronienne; institutions et vie politique, économie, et société, vie intellectuelle, artistique et spirituelle. Brussels.Google Scholar
Pociña, A. (2003) “La Donna secondo Seneca e le donne degli Annei.” In Gualandri and Mazzoli 2003, 327–37.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (1957) “Aristotle Disovers the Economy.” In Trade and Market in Early Empires. Edited by K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, and H. Pearson. Chicago. 64–94.Google Scholar
Pollman, K., ed. (2000) Double Standards in the Ancient and Medieval World. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (1997) Families in Classical and Hellenistic Greece: Representations and Reality. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poncelet, R. (1957) Cicéron traducteur de Platon: l’expression de la pensée complexe en latin classique. Paris.Google Scholar
Porter, C. (1988) “Are We Being Historical Yet?” In The States of Theory. Edited by Carrol, D. New York. 27–62.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (1995) “Content and Form in Philodemus: The History of an Evasion.” In Obbink 1995, 98–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. (1996) “In Search of an Epicurean Aesthetics.” In Giannantoni and Gigante 1996, 611–28.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2005) “Love of Life: Lucretius to Freud.” In Erotikon: Essays on Eros, Ancient and Modern. Edited by S. Bartsch and T. Bartscherer. Chicago. 113–41.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2006a) “Foucault’s Antiquity.” In Martindale and Thomas 2006, 168–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. (2006b) (ed.) Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. (2010) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Poulet, G. (1980) “Criticism and the Experience of Interiority.” In Tompkins 1980, 41–9.Google Scholar
Povinelli, E. (2011) Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham.Google Scholar
Powell, J. (1990) “Laelius de Amicitia: Introduction.” In Cicero: Laelius de Amicitia and Somnium Scipionis. Warminster. 1–26.Google Scholar
Powell, J. (1995a) “Friendship and its Problems in Greek and Roman Thought.” In Innes, et al. 1995, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S., and Richlin, A., eds. (1993) Feminist Theory and the Classics. London.Google Scholar
Radice, R. (2000) Oikeiôsis: Ricerche sul fondamento del pensiero stoico e sulla genesi. Milan.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2009) Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1991) (ed.) Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rawson, B., and Weaver, P., eds. (1997) The Roman Family in Italy: Structure, Sentiment, Space. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichold, A. (2007) “Embodiment and the Ethical Concept of a Person.” In Fielding, et al. 2007, 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, T. (2003) Mirages of the Selfe: Patterns of Personhood in Ancient and Early Modern Europe. Stanford.Google Scholar
Remes, P., and Sihvola, J., eds. (2008) Ancient Philosophy of the Self. Dordecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2006) “The Roman Stoics on Divine Thinking and Human Knowledge.” In Gersh and Moran 2006, 81–94.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2010) “Seneca’s Platonism: The Soul and its Divine Origin.” In Sedley and Nightingale 2010, 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992a) The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. (1993a) “The Ethnographer’s Dilemma and the Dream of a Lost Golden Age.” In Feminist Theory and the Classics. Edited by Richlin and Rabinowitz. New York. 272–303.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1993b) “Not before Homosexuality: The Material Reality of the Cinaedus and the Roman Law against Love between Men.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 3.4, 523–73.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1997) “Gender and Rhetoric: Producing Manhood in the Schools.” In Dominik 1997, 90–110.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1998) “Foucault’s History of Sexuality: A Useful Theory for Women?” In Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998, 138–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlin, A. (2013) “The Fragments of Terentia.” In Lateiner, Gold, and Perkins 2013, 93–113.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1989) “Preface to Bultmann.” In The Conflict of Interpretations. London. 377–97.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. (1990) “Homeric φίλος: Love of Life and Limbs, and Friendship with One’s θυμός.” In Craik 1990, 97–108.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, G. (1966) Descartes: Meditationes de prima philosophia/Méditations Métaphysique. Paris.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, M. (2004) “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia.” CP 99.1, 1–56.Google Scholar
Ronconi, A. (1971) “Traduzione e interpretazione.” In Interpretazioni grammaticali. Roma. 107–35.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991 [1987]) “Non-Reductive Physicalism.” In Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Vol. i. Cambridge. 113–25.Google Scholar
Rorty, R., Scheewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q., eds. (1984) Philosophy in History. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R., and Sluiter, I., eds. (2003) Andreia: Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousselle, A. (1992) “Body Politics in Ancient Rome.” In Duby and Perrot 1992, 296–337.Google Scholar
Rousselle, A. (1996) “The Family under the Roman Empire: Gestures and Signs.” In Burguière 1996, 270–310.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J., and Schofield, M., eds. (2000) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, G. (2011 [1975]) “Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader. Durham. 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. (2004) “On the Happy Life: Descartes vis-à-vis Seneca.” In Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Edited by Strange, S. K. and Zupko, J.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Saller, R. (1994) Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, R. (1997) “Roman Kinship: Structure and Sentiment.” In Rawson and Weaver 1997, 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salles, R., ed. (2005) Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheman, N. (2000) “Feminism in Philosophy of Mind: Against Physicalism.” In Fricker and Hornsby 2000, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1994) “The Palingensis of De Rerum Natura.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 40, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2009) “Seneca and the Denial of the Self.” In Bartsch and Wray 2009, 221–36.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E., ed. (2001) L’Histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine: huit exposés suivis de discussions. Vandoeuvres.Google Scholar
Schmitt, A. (2008) “Subjectivity as a Presupposition of Individuality – On the Conception of Subjectivity in Classical Greece.” In Arweiler and Möller 2008, 313–42.Google Scholar
Schneewind, D. B. (1996) “Kant and Stoic Ethics.” In Engstrom and Whiting 1996, 285–302.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995) “Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica.” In Powell 1995b, 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., and Striker, G., eds. (1986) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1998) “Le regard sur l’invisible.” In Lucrèce et les sciences de la vie. Leiden. 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989) “Philosophical Allegiance in the Greco-Roman World.” In Griffin and Barnes 1989, 97–119.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1993) “Chrysippus on Psychophysical Causality.” In Brunschwig and Nussbaum 1993, 313–31.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1999) “Hellenistic Physics and Metaphysics.” In Algra, et al. 1999, 355–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2003) (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N., and Nightingale, A., eds. (2010) Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality.” Cambridge.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1983) “Boundary Violation and the Landscape of the Self in Seneca Tragedy.” Antike und Abendland 29, 172–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setaioli, A. (1988) Seneca e i Greci: citazioni e traduzioni nelle opere filosofiche. Bologna.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. (1996) “Body/Power/Identity: Passions of the Martyrs.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 4, 269–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (1988) “Soul as Subject in Aristotle’s De Anima.” CQ 38.1, 140–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, M. S. (2003) “Metaphor and Metonymy: Aristotle, Jakobson, Ricoeur and Others.” In Boys-Stones 2003, 115–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1986) “Rescuing Creusa: New Methodological Approaches to Women in Antiquity.” Helios 13.2, 1–8.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1996a) “Women and Language in Archaic Greece, or, Why is Sappho a Woman?” In Greene 1996a, 175–92. [Originally published in Rabinowitz and Richlin 1993, 125–44.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1996b) “Zeus and Leda: The Sexuality Wars in Contemporary Classical Scholarship.” Thamyris 3, 103–23.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1997) “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus.” In Hallett and Skinner 1997, 129–50.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2002 [1759]) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Haakonssen, K.. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. (2005) “A Lover of His Art: The Art-Form as Wife and Mistress in Greek Poetic Imagery.” In Stafford and Herrin 2005, 161–71.Google Scholar
Späth, T. (2010) “Cicero, Tullia, and Marcus: Gender-Specific Concern for Family Tradition?” In Dasen and Späth 2010, 147–72.Google Scholar
Spelman, E. V. (1990) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. (1988) “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Ashcroft, Griffiths, and Tiffin 1995, 24–9.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. (1989) “The New Historicism: Political Commitment and the Postmodern Critic.” In Veeser 1989, 277–92.Google Scholar
Stafford, E. (1998) “Masculine Values, Feminine Forms: On the Gender of Personified Abstractions.” In Foxhall and Salmon 1998, 45–56.Google Scholar
Stafford, E., and Herrin, L., eds. (2005) Personification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Stem, R. (2005) “The First Eloquent Stoic: Cicero on Cato the Younger.” Classical Journal 101.1, 37–49.Google Scholar
Stock, B. (2007) Ethics through Literature: Ascetic and Aesthetic Reading in Western Culture. Lebanon.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1983) “The Role of Oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, 145–67.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. (2003) “Adulta Virgo: The Personification of Textual Eloquence in Cicero’s Brutus.” Materiali e discussion per l’analisi dei testi classici 50, 115–40.Google Scholar
Struck, P. (2004) Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of their Texts. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez Martínez, P. M. (2005) “Constructions ‘apersonnelles’ en latin.” Papers in Grammar 5, 741–8.Google Scholar
Terada, R. (2001) Feeling in Theory: Emotion after the “Death of the Subject.” Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (1997) “Closure: The Book of Vergil.” In Martindale 1997, 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2007) “Onomastic Reference in Seneca: The Case of Plato and the Platonists.” In Bonazzi and Helmig 2007, 133–48.Google Scholar
Tompkins, J., ed. (1980) Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics, and Society. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treggiari, S. (2007) Terentia, Tullia and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’s Family. Abingdon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tress, D. M. (1996) “The Metaphysical Science of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals and its Feminist Critics.” In Ward 1996, 31–50.Google Scholar
Trinacty, C. (2014) Senecan Tragedy and the Reception Augustan Poetry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, J. (1996) “Care as a Political Concept.” In Revisioning the Political. Edited by Hirschman, N. J. and Di Stefano, S.. Boulder.Google Scholar
Vallortigara, G., and Salva, O. R.. (2012) “Predisposizioni per il riconoscimento degli oggetti animati ed il loro ruolo nelle sviluppo della personificazione.” In Moretti and Bonandini 2012, 1–14.Google Scholar
Vance, E. (1986) Mervelous Signals: Poetics and Sign Theory in the Middle Ages. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Vasterling, V. (2007) “Cognitive Theory and Phenomenology in Arendt’s and Nussbaum’s Work on Narrative.” Human Studies 30.2, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verheij, M. (2014) “Selves in Conflict: Gill vs. Sorabji on the Conception of Selfhood in Antiquity. A Reconciliatory Review.” CW 107.2, 169–97.Google Scholar
Vizier, A. (1998) “Incipit Philosophia.” In Larmour, Miller, and Platter 1998, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelke, A-J. (1961) Les Rapports avec autrui dans la philosophie grecque d’Aristote à Panétius. Paris.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1993) “When Justice Replaces Affection: The Need for Rights.” In Liberal Rights: Collected Essays, 1981–1991. Cambridge. 370–91.Google Scholar
Wallach, B. P. (1976) Lucretius and the Diatribe against the Fear of Death. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. (1988) “Discovering the Imagination: Platonists and Stoics on phantasia.” In Dillon and Long 1988b, 208–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. (1954) “Personification as a Mode of Greek Thought.” Journal of the Warburg Institute 17.2, 10–21.Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1985) “The Role of Physics in Stoic Ethics.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 23, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. (1979) “The Basis of Stoic Ethics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83, 143–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. (2010) “Stoic Selection: Objects, Actions, and Agents.” In Nightingale and Sedley 2010, 110–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) “‘Greece is the World’: Exile and Identity in the Second Sophistic.” In Goldhill 2001, 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, A. (2005) “Paternal Grief and the Public Eye: Cicero ‘Ad Familiares’ 4.6.” Phoenix 59, 267–87.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2006a) Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2006b) “Seneca and the Stoic Theory of Cognition: Some Preliminary Remarks.” In Volk and Williams 2006, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2010) “Praebebam enim me facilem opinionibus magnorum uirorum: Platonic Readings in Seneca, Ep. 102.” In Harte, et al. 2010, 205–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2001) “Seneca’s Epistles: Reclassified.” In Harrison 2001, 164–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worman, N. (1997) “The Body as Argument: Helen in Four Greek Texts.” CA 16.1, 151–203.Google Scholar
Wotjyla, K. (1978) “Subjectivity and the Irreducible in Man.” Analecta Husserliana 7, 1107–14.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (1995) “Cicero on Self-Love and Love of Humanity in De Finibus 3.” In Powell 1995b, 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyke, M. (1994) “Taking the Woman’s Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy.” Ramus 23, 110–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. (2005) On Female Body Experience: “Throwing like a Girl,” and Other Essays. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. (2003) “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture.” In Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter. 119–138.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (1999) “Fantasy as Political Category: A Lacanian Approach.” In Wright and Wright 1999, 87–101.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2014) Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. London.Google Scholar