Book contents
- Thinking with Rousseau
- Thinking with Rousseau
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Abbreviations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Rousseau and Machiavelli: Two Interpretations of Republicanism
- Chapter 2 Rousseau and Montaigne: From Enthusiasm to Equanimity
- Chapter 3 Rousseau and Hobbes: The Hobbesianism of Rousseau
- Chapter 4 Rousseau and Montesquieu
- Chapter 5 Rousseau and Mendelssohn: “Enraptured Reason,” Rousseau’s Presence in Moses Mendelssohn’s Thought
- Chapter 6 Rousseau and Smith: On Sympathy as a First Principle
- Chapter 7 Rousseau and A.L. Thomas
- Chapter 8 Rousseau and d’Holbach: The Revolutionary Implications of la philosophie anti-Thérésienne
- Chapter 9 Rousseau and Diderot
- Chapter 10 Rousseau and Kant: Rousseau’s Kantian Legacy
- Chapter 11 Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Solitary Walkers
- Chapter 12 Rousseau and Madame de Staël: A Surprising Dialogue
- Chapter 13 Rousseau and Proudhon: Human Nature, Property, and the Social Contract
- Chapter 14 Rousseau and Marx: On Human Fulfillment
- Chapter 15 Rousseau and Schmitt: Sovereigns and Dictators
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Book contents
- Thinking with Rousseau
- Thinking with Rousseau
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Abbreviations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Rousseau and Machiavelli: Two Interpretations of Republicanism
- Chapter 2 Rousseau and Montaigne: From Enthusiasm to Equanimity
- Chapter 3 Rousseau and Hobbes: The Hobbesianism of Rousseau
- Chapter 4 Rousseau and Montesquieu
- Chapter 5 Rousseau and Mendelssohn: “Enraptured Reason,” Rousseau’s Presence in Moses Mendelssohn’s Thought
- Chapter 6 Rousseau and Smith: On Sympathy as a First Principle
- Chapter 7 Rousseau and A.L. Thomas
- Chapter 8 Rousseau and d’Holbach: The Revolutionary Implications of la philosophie anti-Thérésienne
- Chapter 9 Rousseau and Diderot
- Chapter 10 Rousseau and Kant: Rousseau’s Kantian Legacy
- Chapter 11 Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Solitary Walkers
- Chapter 12 Rousseau and Madame de Staël: A Surprising Dialogue
- Chapter 13 Rousseau and Proudhon: Human Nature, Property, and the Social Contract
- Chapter 14 Rousseau and Marx: On Human Fulfillment
- Chapter 15 Rousseau and Schmitt: Sovereigns and Dictators
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Thinking with RousseauFrom Machiavelli to Schmitt, pp. 295 - 313Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Primary Sources
Bayle, P. “Machiavelli.” In Dictionnaire historique et critique. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Rotterdam, 1702.Google Scholar
“Christianisme.” In Encylopédie ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences des Arts et de Métiers. Fascimilie, ed. 1751–1780. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1966.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Officiis.Google Scholar
Gagnebin, B. “Le role du Législateur dans les conceptions politiques de Rousseau.” In Études sur le “Contrat social,” pp. 277–290. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1964.Google Scholar
Lübbers, A. Alfieri, Foscolo und Manzoni als leser Machiavellis: Die Bedeutung der Literatur für das Risorgimento. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann, 2014.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Discourses on Livy. Translated by Mansfield, Harvey C. and Tarcov, Nathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Florentine Histories. Translated by Banfield, L. and Mansfield, H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Machiavelli and His Friends: Their Personal Correspondence. Translated by Atkinson, J. and Sices, D.. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Machiavelli: The Chief Works and Others. Edited by Gilbert, A.. Durham: Duke University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. Opere di Niccolò Machiavelli. Edited by Vivanti, C. Turin: Einaudi, 1997.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Literary Works of Machiavelli: With Selections from the Private Correspondence. Translated by Hale, J.. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince. Translated by Bondanella, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Manent, P. Naissance de la politique moderne: Machiavel / Hobbes / Rousseau. Paris: Payot, 1977.Google Scholar
Monstesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat. De l’espirit des lois. In Œuvres complètes. Edited by Callois, R.. Paris: Gallimard, 1951.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ridolfi, R. The Life of Niccolò Machiavelli. Translated by Grayson, C.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Correspondance complète de Jean Jacques Rousseau: Édition Critique. Edited by Leigh, R.A.. Publications de l’Institut et Musée Voltaire. 52 vols. Genève: Institut et musée Voltaire, 1965–1991.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Collected Writings of Rousseau. Edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter. Translated by Kelly, Christopher. 13 vols. Hanover: Published for Dartmouth College by University Press of New England, 1990–2010.Google Scholar
Sasso, G. “Il celebrato sogno di Machiavelli.” In Machiavelli e gli antichi e altri saggi, pp. 211–300. Milan: R. Ricciardi, 1988.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau’s Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the “Well-Ordered Society.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. Redeeming the Prince: The Meaning of Machiavelli’s Masterpiece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . Anti-Machiavel: Or, an examination of Machiavel’s Prince. With notes historical and political. Published by Mr. de Voltaire. Translated from the French. London, 1741.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Montaigne, Michel. Les Essais. Edited by Villey, P. and Saulnier, V.-L.. 3 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1965.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . “The E at Delphi.” In Moralia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Silber, E. “Rousseau and Montaigne: The Evolution of a Literary Relationship.” PhD Dissertation: Columbia University, 1968.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. Montaigne in Motion. Translated by Goldhammer, A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. “Rousseau dans la marge de Montaigne: Cinq notes inédites.” Débat 90 (1996): pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Castel, Louis. L’homme moral opposé à l’homme physique de Monsieur R***. Lettre philosophique ou l’on réfute le déisme du jour. Toulouse, 1756.Google Scholar
Castillon, Jean. Discours sur l’origine de l’inegalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam, 1756.Google Scholar
Gerdil, Giacicinto Sigismondo. Discours sur l’homme consideré relativement à l’état de nature, & l’état de société. Turin, 1769.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. On the Citizen. Edited by Tuck, R. and Silverthorne, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Edited by Tonnies, F.. London: Frank Cass & Co., 1969.Google Scholar
Monstesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat. The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by Cohler, A. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Translated by Kennett, B.. London, 1729.Google Scholar
Richter, M. The Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, G. Reading Rousseau in the Nuclear Age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Discourse on Inequality. In The Social Contract and Discourses. Translated by Cole, G.. Edited by Brumfitt, J. and Hall, J.. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Emile, or On Education. Translated by Bloom, A.. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Sieyès, E. Political Writings. Edited by Sonenscher, M.. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 2003.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. “Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, edited by Sorell, T., pp. 175–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wokler, R. “The Influence of Diderot on the Political Theory of Rousseau: Two Aspects of a Relationship.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 132 (1975): pp. 55–111.Google Scholar
Adam, A. “De quelques sources de Rousseau dans la littérature philosophique (1700–1750).” In Jean-Jacques Rousseau et son oeuvre: problèmes et recherches. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck, 1964.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. Montesquieu, Rousseau, Marx. Translated by Brewster, B.. London: Verso, 1972.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. Politique et histoire, de Machiavel à Marx. Edited by Matheron, F.. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2006.Google Scholar
Berman, M. The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society. London: Atheneum, 2009.Google Scholar
Brooke, C. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Derathé, R. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris: J. Vrin, 1970.Google Scholar
Ehrard, J. “Le fils coupable.” In L’esprit des mots: Montesquieu en lui-même et parmi les siens. Geneva: Droz, 1998.Google Scholar
Grace, E. and Kelly, C.. The Challenge of Rousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hampson, N. Will and Circumstance: Montesquieu, Rousseau, and the French Revolution. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Manin, B. “Montesquieu.” In A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution, edited by Furet, F. and Ozouf, M., translated by Goldhammer, A., pp. 728–741. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Monstesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat. De l’esprit des lois. In Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu. vol II Edited by Masson, A.. Paris: Nagel, 1955.Google Scholar
Monstesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat Persian Letters. Translated by Betts, C.J.. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Monstesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by Cohler, A. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and he Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ohji, K. “Nécessité/Contingence: Rousseau et les Lumières selon Louis Althusser.” Lumières 15 (2010): pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
Rahe, P. Against Throne and Altar: Machiavelli and Political Theory under the English Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahe, P. Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty: War, Religion, Commerce, Climate, Terrain, Technology, Uneasiness of Mind, the Spirit of Political Vigilance, and the Foundations of the Modern Republic. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Radica, G. “De Montesquieu à Rousseau: les Anglais sont-ils libres?” Revue française des Idées Politiques 35 (2012): pp. 159–169.Google Scholar
Radica, G. “Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.” On-line Dictionnaire Montesquieu, under the direction of C. Volpilhac-Auger, ENS de Lyon, septembre 2013. URL: http://dictionnaire-montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/fr/article/1377669928/fr.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Confessions. Translated by Scholar, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Correspondance complète de Jean Jacques Rousseau: Édition Critique. Edited by Leigh, R.A.. Publications de l’Institut et Musée Voltaire. 52 vols. Genève: Institut et musée Voltaire, 1965–1991.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Emile, or On Education. Translated by Bloom, A.. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Reveries of the Solitary Walker. Translated by Goulbourne, R.. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Roza, S. and Crétois, P.. Le républicanisme social: une exception française? Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2014.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, A. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau, secrétaire de Madame Dupin d’après des documents inédits avec un inventaire des papiers Dupin dispersés en 1957 et 1958.” Annales des la Société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 36 (1963–65): pp. 173–288.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, M. Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Spector, C. Au Prisme de Rousseau: usages politiques contemporains. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2011.Google Scholar
Spitz, J.-F. La liberté politique: Essai de généalogie conceptuelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, L. What Is Political Philosophy? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959. pg. 45Google Scholar
Terrel, J. Les Théories du pacte social: Droit natural, souveraineté et contrat de Bodin à Rousseau. Paris: Éditions due Seuil, 2001.Google Scholar
Whatmore, R. Against War and Empire: Geneva, Britain, and France in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wootton, D. “Introduction.” In The Basic Political Writings by Rousseau, J.-J.. Translated by Cress, D.. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 2011.Google Scholar
Yack, B. The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Altmann, A. Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Arkush, A. Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bachmann, H.-M. Die naturrechtliche Staatslehre Christian Wolffs. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1977.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Berghahn, K. “On Friendship: The Beginnings of a Christian-Jewish Dialogue in the 18th Century.” In The German-Jewish Dialogue Reconsidered: A Symposium in Honor of George L. Mosse, edited by Berghahn, K., New York: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar
Blum, C. Rousseau and the Republic of Virtue: The Language of Politics in the French Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bourel, D. “Les Réserves de Mendelssohn: Rousseau, Voltaire et les Juif de Berlin.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 32 (1978): pp. 309–326.Google Scholar
Erlin, M. Berlin’s Forgotten Future: City, History and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Erlin, M. “Reluctant Modernism: Moses Mendelssohn’s Philosophy of History.” Journal of the History of Ideas 63:1 (2002): pp. 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenthal, G. No Religion Without Idolatry: Mendelssohn’s Jewish Enlightenment. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, M. Faith and Freedom: Moses Mendelssohn’s Theological Political Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, M. Moses Mendelssohn: Writings on Judaism, Christianity and the Bible. Waltham: Brandeis University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Hamann, J.G. Abaelardi Virbii Chimärische Einfälle über den zehnten Theil der Breife die Neuste Literatur betreffend. Königsberg, 1761.Google Scholar
Hornig, G. “Perfektibilität: Eine Untersuchung zur Geschichte und Bedeutung dieses Begriffs in der deutschsprachigen Literatur.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 24 (1980): pp. 221–273.Google Scholar
Jaumann, H., ed. Rousseau in Deutschland: Neue Beiträge zur Erforschung seiner Rezeption. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.Google Scholar
Kors, A., ed. Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, 4 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Liebeschütz, H. “Mendelssohn und Lessing in ihrer Stellung zur Geschichte.” In Studies in Jewish Religious and Intellectual History, edited by Stein, S. and Loewe, R., pp. 167–182. University: University of Alabama Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Litvak, O. Haskalah: The Romantic Movement in Judaism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marks, J. “Rousseau’s Use of the Jewish Example.” The Review of Politics 72 (2010): pp. 463–481.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. 27 vols. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1972-.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., ed. German-Jewish History in Modern Times, 4 vols. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rapp, F. and Schuett, H.-W., eds. Philosophie und Wissenschaft in Preussen. Berlin: Universitätsbibliothek, 1982.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. “Luxury.” In Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, edited by Kors, A., 4 vols, vol. II, pp. 440–445. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rotenstreich, N. “On Mendelssohn’s Political Philosophy.” Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 11 (1966), pp. 28–41.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J., Rousseau patriotische Vorstellungen gegen die Einführung eine Schaubühne in Genf. Zurich, 1761.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., ed. What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sorkin, D. Moses Mendelssohn and the Religious Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tubach, F. “Perfectibilité: der zweite Diskurs Rousseau und die deutsche Aufklärung.” Etudes Germaniques 15 (1960): pp. 155–151.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C., ed. Rom-Paris-London: Erfahrung und Selbsterfahrung deutscher Schriftsteller und Künstler in den fremden Metropolen. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C. “Smith under Strain.” European Journal of Political Theory 3 (2004): pp. 455–463.Google Scholar
Dent, N. Rousseau: An Introduction to his Psychological, Social and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Faccarello, G. “A Tale of Two Traditions: Pierre Force’s Self-Interest before Adam Smith.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12:4 (2005): pp. 701–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Force, P. “Putting Categorizations in Context.” The Adam Smith Review 3 (2007): pp. 211–214.Google Scholar
Force, P. Self-Interest before Adam Smith. A Genealogy of Economic Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Force, P. “Self-Love, Identification, and the Origin of Political Economy.” Yale French Studies 92 (1997): pp. 46–64.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. Anthropologie et politique. Les principes du système de Rousseau. Paris: J. Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar
Hont, I. Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M.. “Needs and Justice in the Wealth of Nations.” In Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, edited by Hont, I., pp. 389–443. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hundert, E. The Enlightenment’s Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hurtado, J. “Pity, Sympathy and Self-Interest: Review of Pierre Force’s Self-Interest before Adam Smith.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12:4 (2005): pp. 713–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatieff, M. “Smith, Rousseau and the Republic of Needs.” In Scotland and Europe 1200–1850, edited by Smout, T., pp. 187–206. Edinburgh: John Donald, 1986.Google Scholar
Larrère, C. “Adam Smith et Jean-Jacques Rousseau: sympathie et pitié.” Kairos. Revue de Philosophie 20 (2002): pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Macfie, A. The Individual and Society: Papers on Adam Smith. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1967.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. The Figure of Theater: Shaftesbury, Defoe, Adam Smith, and George Eliot. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Meek, R. Social Science and the Ignoble Savage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Morrow, R. The Ethical and Economic Theories of Adam Smith: A Study in the Social Philosophy of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1923.Google Scholar
Pack, S. Review of Self-Interest before Adam Smith. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27:4 (2005): pp. 465–467.Google Scholar
Pack, S. “The Rousseau-Smith Connection: Towards an Understanding of Professor West’s ‘Splenetic Smith.’” History of Economic Ideas 8:3 (2000): pp. 35–62.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Collected Writings of Rousseau. Edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter. Translated by Kelly, Christopher. 13 vols. Hanover: Published for Dartmouth College by University Press of New England, 1990–2010.Google Scholar
Schliesser, E. Review of Pierre Force, Self-Interest before Adam Smith. The Adam Smith Review 3 (2007): pp. 203–211.Google Scholar
Sewall, R. “Rousseau’s Second Discourse in England from 1755 to 1762.” Philological Quarterly 17:2 (1938): pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Smith, A. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. 6 Vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976–1983.Google Scholar
Tribe, K. Review of P. Force, Self-Interest before Adam Smith. History of Economic Ideas 12:3 (2004): pp. 123–125.Google Scholar
Vivenza, G. Review of Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science. EH.NET, September 2004: http://eh.net/book_reviews/self-interest-before-adam-smith-a-genealogy-of-economic-science/ (Accessed September 16, 2014).Google Scholar
Winch, D. Riches and Poverty. An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bonnet, J.-C. Naissance du Panthéon: Essai sur la culte des grands hommes. Paris: Fayard, 1998.Google Scholar
Boon, S. The Life of Madame Necker: Sin, Redemption, and the Parisian Salon. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2011.Google Scholar
Brown, G. A Field of Honor: Writers, Court Culture and Public Theater in French Literary Life from Racine to the Revolution. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Craveri, B. The Age of Conversation. Translated by Waugh, T.. New York: New York Review Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Darnton, R. “The High Enlightenment and the Low-Life of Literature.” In The Literary Underground of the Old Regime, pp. 1–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Daston, L. “The Naturalized Female Intellect.” Science in Context 5 (1992): pp. 209–235.Google Scholar
Dubeau, C. “L’Epreuve du salon ou Le Monde comme performance dans les Mélanges et les Nouveaux Mélanges de Suzanne Necker.” Cahiers staëliens 57 (2006): pp. 201–225.Google Scholar
Dubeau, C. La lettre et la mère: Roman familial et écriture de la passion chez Suzanne Necker et Germaine de Staël. Quebec: Presses De L’Université Laval, 2013.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E. and Goodman, D., eds. Going Public: Women and Publishing in Early Modern France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. “Suzanne Necker’s Mélanges: Gender, Writing, and Publicity.” In Going Public: Women and Publishing in Early Modern France, edited by Goldsmith, E. and Goodman, D., pp. 210–223. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Henriet, M. L’académicien Thomas (1732–1785) d’après des correspondances inédits. Paris: H. Leclerc, 1918.Google Scholar
Hepp, N. “La belle et la bête, ou la femme et le pédant dans l’universe romanesque du XVIIe Siècle.” Revue d’Histoire littéraire de la France 77:3/4 (1977): pp. 564–577.Google Scholar
Klein, L. and La Vopa, A., eds. Enthusiasm and Enlightenment in Europe, 1650–1850. San Marino: Huntington Library, 1998.Google Scholar
Micard, E. Un écrivain académique au XVIIIe siècle, Antoine-Léonard Thomas (1732–1785). Paris: E. Champion, 1924.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. Barbarism and Religion. Volume I: The Enlightenments of Edward Gibbon, 1737–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, H. Rousseau and Geneva from the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Russo, E. Styles of Enlightenment: Taste, Politics, and Authorship in Eighteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.L. Essai sur le caractère, les moeurs et l’espirit des femmes dans les différents siècles. 1772.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.L. Essai sur les éloges, ou histoire de la litérature et de l’éloquence. 1773. Reprint, Paris, 1812.Google Scholar
Villa, A. Enlightenment and Pathology: Sensibility in the Literature and Medicine of Eighteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
La Vopa, A. “Sexless Minds at Work and at Play: Poullain de la Barre and the Origins of Early Modern Feminism.” Representations 109 (2010): pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Waquet, F. Latin or the Empire of the Sign. Translated by Howe, J.. London: Verso, 2001.Google Scholar
L’Aminot, T. “D’Holbach et Rousseau ou la relation déplaisante.” Corpus: Revue de philosophie no. 22/23 (1993): pp. 117–128.Google Scholar
L’Aminot, T. ed. Politique et révolution chez Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1994.Google Scholar
Archives Parlementaires. Series 1 (1787–1794). Edited by Mavidal, M.J. et al. 102 Vols. Paris, 1879–2005.Google Scholar
Badinet, E, ed. Correspondance inédite de Condorcet et Mme Suard, M. Suard, et Garat (1771–1791). Paris: Fayard, 1988.Google Scholar
Bonnerot, O.-H. “Louis-Sebastian Mercier: lecteur et éditeur de Jean-Jacques Rousseau.” In Rousseau, l’Émile et la Révolution, edited by Thiery, Robert, pp. 415–423. Paris: Universitas, 1992.Google Scholar
Carra, J.-L. Annales patriotiques et littéraires de la France.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, T. Emulation: David, Drouais, and Girodet in the Art of Revolutionary France. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Curran, M. Atheism, Religion and Enlightenment in pre-Revolutionary Europe. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Cushing, M. “Baron d’Holbach: A Study of Eighteenth Century Radicalism in France.” PhD Dissertation: Columbia University, 1914.Google Scholar
De Bolla, P. The Architecture of Concepts: The Historical Formation of Human Rights. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Gagnebin, B. “L’Influence de Rousseau sur la Déclaration des droits de l’Homme et du citoyen.” In Reappraisals of Rousseau: Studies in Honour of R. A. Leigh, edited by Harvey, S. et al., pp. 75–89. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Garrard, G. Rousseau’s Counter-Enlightenment: A Republican Critique of the Philosophes. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.Google Scholar
D’Holbach, P.H.T., Baron. La Morale universalle, ou Les Devoirs de l’homme fondés sur sa nature. 3 vols. Amsterdam, 1776.Google Scholar
D’Holbach, P.H.T. Baron. Le Bon-Sens du cé J. Meslier suivi de son testament. Londres [Amsterdam], 1772.Google Scholar
Hulliung, M. The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. “Louis XVI wasn’t killed by Ideas. This is what happens when you ignore the role of Politics in Intellectual History.” New Republic, 27 June 2014.Google Scholar
Israel, J. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Israel, J. Revolutionary Ideas: An Intellectual History of the French Revolution from the Rights of Man to Robespierre. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Jayne, A. Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence: Origins, Philosophy and Theology. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1998.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. “Le Part d’Émile dans la « regéneration » de 1789.” In Rousseau, l’Émile et la Révolution, edited by Thiery, R., pp. 375–383. Paris: Universitas, 1992.Google Scholar
Lemny, S. Jean-Louis Carra (1742–1793): parcours d’un révolutionniare. Paris: Harmattan, 2000.Google Scholar
Loft, L. Passion, Politics and Philosophie: Rediscovering J.P. Brissot. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mercier, L. De J.J. Rousseau considéré comme l’un des premiers auteurs de la Révolution. Paris, 1791.Google Scholar
Müller, L. “Marie-Therèse Lavasseur.” In Dictionnaire de Jean-Jacques Rousseau, edited by Trousson, R. and Eigeldinger, F., pp. 539–544. Paris: H. Champion, 2006.Google Scholar
Naigeon, J. “Lettres sur la mort de M. Le baron d’Holbach.” Journal de Paris 40 (9 February 1789): pp. 176–177.Google Scholar
Naville, P. Paul Thiry d’Holbach et la philosophie scientifique au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Gallimard, 1943.Google Scholar
Raynal, T. G. T.G. Raynal démasqué, ou Lettres sur la vie et les ouvrages de cet écrivain. Paris, 1791.Google Scholar
Riley, P. The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Robespierre, M. Le Défenseur.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Confessions. In The Collected Writings of Rousseau. Edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter. Translated by Kelly, Christopher. Vol. 5. Hanover: Published for Dartmouth College by University Press of New England, 1995.Google Scholar
Staum, M. Cabanis: Enlightenment and Medical Philosophy in the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Swenson, J. On Jean-Jacques Rousseau Considered as One of the First Authors of the Revolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Valsania, M. The Limits of Optimism: Thomas Jefferson’s Dualistic Enlightenment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Vercruysse, J. Bibliographie descriptive des écrits du Baron d’Holbach. Paris: Minard, 1971.Google Scholar
Villaverde, M. “Rousseau, lecteur de Spinoza.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 369 (1999): pp. 107–139.Google Scholar
Villaverde, M. “Spinoza, Rousseau: dos concepciones de democracia.” Revista de estudios políticos 116 (2002): pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
Williams, D. “Spinoza and the General Will.” The Journal of Politics 72 (2010): pp. 341–356.Google Scholar
Wokler, R. Rousseau, the Age of Enlightenment and Their Legacies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Citton, Y. “Retour sur la misérable querelle Rousseau-Diderot: Position, conséquence, spectacle et sphère publique.” Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie 36 (2004): http://rde.revues.org/index282.html.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. Oeuvres complètes. Edited by Dieckmann, H. et al. 28 vols. Paris: Hermann, 1975-.Google Scholar
Fabre, J. “Frères ennemis: Diderot et Jean-Jacques.” Diderot Studies 3 (1961): pp. 155–213.Google Scholar
Gatefin, E. Diderot, Sénèque et Jean-Jacques: Un dialogue à trois voix. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007.Google Scholar
Israel, J. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Israel, J. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Melzer, A. The Natural Goodness of Man: On the System of Rousseau’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Oeuvres complètes. 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèqu de la Pléiade, 1959–1969.Google Scholar
Russo, E. “Slander and Glory in the Republic of Letters: Diderot and Seneca Confront Rousseau.” Republics of Letters: A Journal for the Study of Knowledge, Politics, and the Arts 1:1 (2009): http://rofl.stanford.edu/node/40.Google Scholar
Shea, L. The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, J. “Diderot’s Brain.” In Philosophical Turns: Eighteenth-Century Literature, Thought, and Aesthetics, edited by Conway, A. and McMurran, M.H.. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. “Freedom as the Foundation of Morality: Kant’s Early Efforts.” In Kant’s ‘Observations’ and ‘Remarks’: A Critical Guide, edited by Shell, S. and Velkley, R., pp. 77–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, I. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by Zöller, Günther. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kant, I. Bemerkungen zu den Beobachtungen über das Gefühl des Schönen und Erhabenen. Edited by Rischmüller, M.. Meiner Verlag, Hamburg: F., 1991.Google Scholar
Kant, I. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings. Edited by Frierson, P. and Guyer, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Oeuvres complètes. 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèqu de la Pléiade, 1959–1969.Google Scholar
Backscheider, P. Eighteenth-Century Women Poets and Their Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bending, S. Green Retreats: Women, Gardens and Eighteenth-Century Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Berman, M. The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society. New York: Atheneum, 1970.Google Scholar
Burke, E. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. 1759.Google Scholar
Carter, P. Men and the Emergence of Polite Society: Britain, 1660–1800. London: Longman, 2001.Google Scholar
Chandler, J., ed. The Cambridge History of English Romantic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Damrosch, L. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Restless Genius. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2005.Google Scholar
Duffy, E. Rousseau in England: The Context for Shelley’s Critique of the Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Haggerty, G. Men in Love: Masculinity and Sexuality in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Havens, R. “Solitude and the Neoclassicists.” English Literary History 21:4 (1954): pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
Hill, B. “A Refuge from Men: The Idea of a Protestant Nunnery.” Past and Present 117 (1987): pp. 107–130.Google Scholar
Holmes, Richard. “Introduction.” In A Short Residence in Sweden and Memoirs of the Author of a ‘Vindication of the Rights of Woman’ by Wollstonecraft, Mary and Godwin, William, pp. 36–42. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar
Laqueur, T. Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation. New York: Zone Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Leigh, R.A. “Boswell and Rousseau.” The Modern Language Review 47:3 (1952): pp. 290–318.Google Scholar
Mullan, J. Sentiment and Sociability: the Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Neidleman, J. “Rousseau and the Desire for Communion.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 47:1 (2013): pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
Noyes, W. “The Insanity of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.” The American Journal of Psychology. 3:3 (1890): pp. 406–429.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. Women’s Reading in Britain, 1750–1835: A Dangerous Recreation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Porter, R. Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World. London: Penguin, 2000.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Emile, or On Education. Translated by Bloom, A.. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Letter to D’Alembert on the Theatre. In Politics and the Arts. Translated by Bloom, A.. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Rêveries of the Solitary Walker. Translated by France, P.. London: Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Collected Writings of Rousseau. Edited by Kelly, Christopher, Masters, Roger D., and Stillman, Peter. Translated by Kelly, Christopher. 13 vols. Hanover: Published for Dartmouth College by University Press of New England, 1990–2010.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Edited and translated by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Edited and translated by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sayre, R. Solitude in Society: A Sociological Study of French Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. The Sexual Politics of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Shea, L. The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. 1759. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Spacks, P. Privacy: Concealing the Eighteenth-Century Self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. Transparency and Obstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. “Separations of Soul: Solitude, Biography, History.” American Historical Review 114:3 (2009): pp. 640–651.Google Scholar
Todd, J. The Sign of Angelica: Women, Writing and Fiction, 1660–1800. London: Virago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. Imperfect Garden: The Legacy of Humanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. Collected Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft. Edited by Wardle, R.. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. 7 vols. Edited by Todd, J. and Butler, M.. London: Pickering, 1989.Google Scholar
Annales Benjamin Constant. 8–9: Le Groupe de Coppet et la Révolution francaise. Lausanne & Paris: Institut Benjamin Constant & Jean Touzot, 1988.Google Scholar
Berman, M. The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society. Second edition. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar
Constant, B. Oeuvres Complètes, vol. IV. Discours au Tribunat. De la possibilité d’une constitution républicaine dans un grand pays (1799–1803). Edited by Sánchez-Mejia, M. and Klooke, K.. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. “Flirting with Republicanism: Madame de Staël’s Writings from the 1790s.” History of European Ideas 36:3 (2010): pp. 343–346.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. “Moderation and the Group of Coppet.” In Germaine de Staël’s Politics of Mediation: Challenges to History and Culture, edited by Szmurlo, K., pp. 109–124. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2011.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. “A Tale of Two Moderates.” History of European Ideas 39:1 (2013): pp. 141–150.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
De Staël, G. Considerations on the Principal Events of the French Revolution. Edited by Craiutu, A.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fun, 2008.Google Scholar
De Staël, G. Des circonstances actuelles qui peuvent terminer la Révolution et des principes qui doivent fonder la république en France. Edited by Omacini, L.. Geneva: Slatkine, 1979.Google Scholar
De Staël, G. Lettres sur les écrits et le caractère de J.J. Rousseau. In Oeuvres Complètes de Madame la Barone de Staël publiées par son fils. Vol. 1. Paris: Treuttel and Würtz, 1821.Google Scholar
De Staël, G. Oeuvres Complètes, Série III: Oeuvres historiques, Tome I, Des circonstanceos actuelles et autres essais politiques sous la Révolution. Edited by Omacini, L.. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2009.Google Scholar
Furet, F. and Ozouf, M., eds. A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Gengembre, G. and Goldzink, J.. “Une femme révolutionnée: le Thermidor de Mme de Staël,” Annals Benjamin Constant 8–9. Lausanne & Paris: Institute Benjamin Constant & Jean Touzot, 1988, p. 275.Google Scholar
Jaume, L. L’Individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français. Paris: Fayard, 1997.Google Scholar
Jaume, L. ed. Coppet, creuset de l’esprit libéral: les idées politiques et constitutionnelles du group de Madame de Staël. Marseille & Paris: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille & Economica, 2000.Google Scholar
Lottérie, F. and Poisson, G., eds. Jean-Jacques Rousseau devant Coppet. Geneva: Slatkine, 2012.Google Scholar
Marso, L. (Un)Manly Citizens: Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s and Germaine de Staël’s Subversive Women. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mortier, R. “Comment terminer la Révolution et fonder le République,” Annales Benjamin Constant 8–9. Laussane & Paris: Institute Benjamin Constant & Jean Touzot, 1988, pp. 293–307.Google Scholar
Munteano, B. Les idées politiques de Madame de Staël et la Constitution de l’an III. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1931.Google Scholar
Orwin, C. and Tarcov, N., eds. The Legacy of Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Paulet-Grandguillot, E. Libéralisme et démocratie. De Sismondi à Constant, à partir du Contrat social (1801–1806). Geneva: Slatkine, 2010.Google Scholar
Roussel, J. Jean-Jacques Rousseau en France après la Révolution, 1795–1830. Paris: Armand Colin, 1972.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. Recherches sur les constitutions des peuples libres. Edited by Minerbi, Marco. Geneva: Droz, 1965.Google Scholar
Sismondi, J. Libertà e scienza del governo in Sismondi, vol. II: Essais sur les constitutions des peoples libres. Edited by di Reda, R.. Rome: Jouvence, 1988.Google Scholar
Tilkin, F., ed. Le groupe de Coppet et le monde moderne: conceptions-images-débats. Geneva: Droz, 1998.Google Scholar
Haubtmann, P., ed. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: sa vie et sa pensée (1809–1849). Paris: Beauchesne, 1982.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. Correspondance de P.-J. Proudhon. Edited by Langlois, J.-A.. Vol. 1. Paris: Lacroix, 1875.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. De la célébration du dimanche. 1839. Edited by Augé-Laribé, M.. Paris: Rivière, 1926.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. De la création de l’ordre dans l’humanité ou principes d’organisation politique. 1843. Edited by Bougle, C. and Cuvillier, A.. Paris: Rivière, 1926.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l’Église. 1858. Edited by Bouglé, C. and Puech, J-L., 4 vols. Paris: Rivière, 1930–1935.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. Deuxième mémoire sur la propriété. 1841. Edited by Augé-Laribé, M.. Paris: Rivière, 1938.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. L’Idée générale de la révolution au XIXe siècle. 1851. Edited by Berthod, A.. Paris: Rivière, 1924.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. Property Is Theft! A Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Anthology. Edited by McKay, I.. Translated by Sharkey, P.. Edinburgh: AK Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. Qu’est-ce que la propriété? 1840. Edited by Augé-Laribé, M.. Paris: Rivière, 1926.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. Qu’est-ce que la propriété? Deuxième mémoire: lettere à M. Blanqui sur la propriété. 1841. Edited by Augé-Laribé, M.. Paris: Rivière, 1938.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. Système des contradictions économiques ou philosophie de la misère. 1846. Edited by Picard, R.. Paris: Rivière, 1923.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. What Is Property? Edited by Kelley, D. and Smith, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Oeuvres complètes. 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèqu de la Pléiade, 1959–1969.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. J.-J. Rousseau, la transparence et l’obstacle, suivi de sept essais sur Rousseau. Paris: Gallimard, 1948.Google Scholar
Vincent, K.S. Benjamin Constant and the Birth of French Liberalism. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Vincent, K.S. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and the Rise of French Republican Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Vincent, K.S. “Pierre-Joseph Proudhon et son influence sur la pensée socialiste.” Corpus: revue de philosophie 47 (2004): pp. 355–366.Google Scholar
Furet, F. and Ozouf, M.. A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Translated by Goldhammer, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L. Main Currents of Marxism. Translated by Falla, P. S.. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Marx, K. “Toward the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law: Introduction.” In Writings of Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Translated and edited by Easton, L. and Guddat, K.. New York: Anchor Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Marx, K. “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.” In Marx, and Engels, , Selected Works in One Volume. New York: International Publishers, 1968.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. The German Ideology. Translated by Ryazanskaya, S.. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1965.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Emile, ou de l’éducation. Translated by Wirz, C.. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.Google Scholar
Seigel, J. Marx’s Fate: The Shape of a Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Translated by Goldhammer, A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bates, D. “Political Theology and the Nazi State: Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Institution.” Modern Intellectual History 3 (2006): pp. 415–452.Google Scholar
Bates, D. States of War: Enlightenment Origins of the Political. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kojève, A. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Translated by Nichols, J.. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lilla, M. “The Enemy of Liberalism.” New York Review of Books 44:8 (May 15, 1997): pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. “Visions of Global Order: Schmitt, Aron, and the Civil Servant of the World Spirit.” In A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Pasquino, P. “Between Machiavelli and Schmitt: Remarks on Rousseau’s Dictatorship.” Storia del pensiero politico 1 (2013): pp. 145–154.Google Scholar
Rossiter, C. Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in Modern Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. Extrait de projet de paix perperuelle de Monsieur L’Abbe de Saint-Pierre. In Oeuvres complètes. Vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1959.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Edited and translated by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Edited and translated by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. Constitutional Theory. Translated by Seitzer, J.. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. “Dem wahren Von Johann Jakob Rousseau.” Die Zürcher Woche 26 (June 29, 1962).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle. Translated by Hoelzl, M. and Ward, G.. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. Legality and Legitimacy. Translated by Seitzer, J.. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, G.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. “The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations.” In Concept of the Political, Translated by McCormick, J., 1929.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Translated by Kennedy, E.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. “The Großraum Order of International Law with a Ban on Intervention for Spatially Foreign Powers: A Contribution to the Concept of Reich in International Law.” In Writings on War. Translated by Nunan, T.. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. The “Nomos” of the Earth in the International Law of the “Jus Publicum Europaem.” Translated by Ulmen, G.. New York: Telos, 2003.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. Theory of the Partisan: Intermediate Remark on the Concept of the Political. Translated by Ulmen, G.. New York: Telos, 2006.Google Scholar