Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- 2 International regulation and cross-country comparisons
- 3 Legal regulation of family creation through gamete donation
- 4 Reproductive donation in the context of environmental and global justice
- 5 Normative and regulatory issues in cross-border reproductive health care
- 6 Surrogacy
- 7 A better legal framework for United Kingdom surrogacy?
- Part II How many children per donor?
- Part III Donors
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
2 - International regulation and cross-country comparisons
from Part I - International, cross-border and global issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- 2 International regulation and cross-country comparisons
- 3 Legal regulation of family creation through gamete donation
- 4 Reproductive donation in the context of environmental and global justice
- 5 Normative and regulatory issues in cross-border reproductive health care
- 6 Surrogacy
- 7 A better legal framework for United Kingdom surrogacy?
- Part II How many children per donor?
- Part III Donors
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regulating Reproductive Donation , pp. 39 - 59Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Primary Sources
Corte Costituzionale della Repubblica Italiana, 2014. Sentenza 162/2014 [Ruling 162/2014].Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
S.H. and others v. Austria [2011]ECHR.Google Scholar
A, B & C v. Ireland, App No 25579/05, (2011) 53 EHRR 13.Google Scholar
Evans v. United Kingdom (2007) App No 6339/05, (2008) 46 EHRR 34.Google Scholar
Murillo, Artaviaet al. (‘In Vitro Fertilization’) v. Costa Rica [2012]I/A Court H.R. 12361.Google Scholar
Conselho Federal Dd Medicina (Federal Council of Medicine).Google Scholar
Resolution CFM No 2.013/2013. Article 4, Doacao de Gametas ou Embrioes (Gametes and embryo donation).Google Scholar
Técnicas de Reproducción Humana Asistida. Ley N. 19.167.Google Scholar
European Convention on Human Rights.Google Scholar
Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells.Google Scholar
Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare.Google Scholar
Directive 2006/17/ EC and Patient Mobility Directive.Google Scholar
Constitution of the United States.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by