Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T06:44:01.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Bizat Ruhama

from Part III: - Archaeology of Human Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Yehouda Enzel
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ofer Bar-Yosef
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The archaeological horizon of Bizat Ruhama, an Early Pleistocene hominin site in the Negev Coastal Plain, Israel, is at the base of 17 m thick sedimentary sequence composed of loess, clays and sands. The site is assigned to the Matuyama reverse polarity chron. Equus cf. tabeti, and antelope Pontoceros ambiguus or Spirocerus sp. remains also points to an Early Pleistocene age. The fauna of Bizat Ruhama belongs to the same faunal unit as 'Ubeidiya and predates the Jaramillo normal event. The site represents a short-term occupation at an inter-dune depression, where animal carcasses were processed on site along with stone knapping activities. Micromorphological and faunal evidence indicate an open, poorly vegetated, semi-arid environment with patchy water sources. The lithic assemblage is composed of cores, flakes and secondarily knapped flakes. The bipolar technique was often used and the goal of the knapping was to produce sharp-edged flakes. Technological simplicity, use of bipolar technique, and absence of large flake technology and of bifacial knapping suggest that the site represents Oldowan dispersal out of Africa.
Type
Chapter
Information
Quaternary of the Levant
Environments, Climate Change, and Humans
, pp. 195 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyene, Y., Katoh, S., WoldeGabriel, G. et al. 2013. The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulian at Konso, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110: 1584–91.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1953. Notules de typologie paléolithique: i. Outils moustériens à fracture volontaire. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française L: 224–6.Google Scholar
Burdukiewicz, J.M. & Ronen, A. 2000. Ruhama in the northern Negev Desert. A new microlithic site of the Lower Palaeolithic in Israel. Praehistoria Thuringica 5: 3246.Google Scholar
Crovetto, C., Ferrari, M., Peretto, C., Longo, L. & Vianello, F. 1994. The carinated denticulates from the Paleolithic site of Isernia La Pineta (Molise, Central Italy): Tools or flaking waste? The results of the 1993 lithic experiments. Human Evolution 9: 175207.Google Scholar
Delarue, R. & Vignard, E. 1958. Intention et fractures moustériennes sectionnant des racloirs. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française LI: 2931.Google Scholar
de la Torre, I. & Mora, R. 2005. Technological Strategies in the Lower Pleistocene at Olduvai Beds I & II. ERAUL 112. Liège: University of Liège Press.Google Scholar
de la Torre, I. & Mora, R. 2009. The technology of the ST site complex. In Peninj: A Research Project on Human Origins (1995–2005), ed. Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Alcalá, L. & Luque, L.. Oxford and Oakville: Oxbow Books, pp. 145–89.Google Scholar
Dibble, H.L. & McPherron, S. 2006. The missing Mousterian. Current-Anthropology 47: 777803.Google Scholar
Dibble, H.L. & McPherrron, S. 2007. Truncated-faceted pieces: Hafting modification, retouch, or cores? In Cores or Tools? Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis, ed. McPherron, S.. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 7590.Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N. 1988. Too small to be true? Reevaluation of cores on flakes in Levantine Mousterian assemblages. Lithic Technology 17: 3744.Google Scholar
Lamdan, M., Ziffer, D., Huster, Y. & Ronen, A. 1977. Prehistoric Archaeological Survey of Nahal Shiqma. Shaar Hanegev: Local Council of Shaar Hanegev (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Laukhin, S.A., Ronen, A., Pospelova, G.A. et al. 2001. New data on the geology and geochronology of the Lower Palaeolithic site Bizat Ruhama in the southern Levant. Paléorient 27: 6980.Google Scholar
Malinsky-Buller, A., Grosman, L. & Marder, O. 2011. A case of techno-typological lithic variability & continuity in the late Lower Palaeolithic. Before Farming 2011/1: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallol, C., VanNieuwenhuyse, D. & Zaidner, Y. 2011. Depositional and paleoenvironmental setting of the Bizat Ruhama Early Pleistocene archaeological assemblages (northern Negev, Israel): A microstratigraphic perspective. Geoarchaeology 26: 118–41.Google Scholar
Martínez-Navarro, B., Belmaker, M. & Bar-Yosef, O. 2012. The bovid assemblage (Bovidae, Mammalia) from the Early Pleistocene site of ‘Ubeidiya, Israel: Biochronological and paleoecological implications for the fossil and lithic bearing strata. Quaternary International 267: 7897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohel, M.Y. 1976. Upper Acheulian handaxes from Ruhama, Israel. Tel Aviv 3: 4956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, C. 1994. Le industrie littiche del giacimento paleolitico di Isernia La Pineta, la typologia, le trace di utilizzazione, la sperimentazione. Isernia: Istituto Regionale per gli Studi Storici del Molise ‘V. Cuoco’, C. Iannone.Google Scholar
Piperno, M., Collina, C., Galloti, R. et al. 2009. Obsidian exploitation and utilization during the Oldowan at Melka Kunture (Ethiopia). In Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Oldowan, ed. Hovers, E. & Braun, D.R.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 111–28.Google Scholar
Ronen, A., Burdukiewicz, J.-M., Laukhin, S.A. et al. 1998. The Lower Palaeolithic site Bizat Ruhama in the northern Negev, Israel. Archäo-logisches Korrespondenzblatt 28: 163–73.Google Scholar
Semaw, S., Rogers, M. & Stout, D. 2009. The Oldowan–Acheulian transition: Is there a ‘Developed Oldowan’ artifact tradition? In Sourcebook of Paleolithic Transitions, ed. Camps, M. & Chauhan, P.. New York: Springer, pp. 173–93.Google Scholar
Yaalon, D.H. & Dan, J. 1967. Factors controlling soil formation and distribution in the Mediterranean coastal plain of Israel during the Quaternary. Paper presented at the 7th INQUA Congress 1965, pp. 321–38.Google Scholar
Yeshurun, R., Zaidner, Y., Eisenmann, V., Martínez-Navarro, B. & Bar-Oz, G. 2011. Lower Paleolithic hominin ecology at the fringe of the desert: Faunal remains from Bizat Ruhama and Nahal Hesi, Northern Negev, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 60: 492507.Google Scholar
Zaidner, Y. 2003. The use of raw material at the Lower Paleolithic site of Bizat Ruhama, Israel. In Lower Palaeolithic Small Tools in Europe and the Levant, ed. Burdukiewicz, J.M. & Ronen, A., BAR Inter-national Series 1115. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar
Zaidner, Y. 2011. The core-and-flake industry of Bizat Ruhama, Israel: Assessing early Pleistocene cultural affinities. In The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic in the Middle East and Neighboring Regions, ed. LeTensorer, J.-M., Jagher, R. & Otte, M., ERAUL 126. Liège: University of Liège Press, pp. 1324.Google Scholar
Zaidner, Y. 2013. Adaptive flexibility of Oldowan hominins: Secondary use of flakes at Bizat Ruhama, Israel. PLoS ONE 8: e66851.Google Scholar
Zaidner, Y. 2014. Lithic Production Strategies at the Early Pleistocene Site of Bizat Ruhama, Israel. BAR International Series 2685. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Zaidner, Y., Yeshurun, R. & Mallol, C. 2010. Early Pleistocene hominins outside of Africa: Recent excavations at Bizat Ruhama, Israel. Paleo-Anthropology 2010: 162–95.Google Scholar
Zilberman, E. 1984. The Neogene and the Quaternary in the Central Negev. In Outlines of the Geology of the Northwestern Negev, ed. Z.B. Begin, Geological Survey of Israel Report GSI/19/84.Google Scholar
Zilberman, E. 1986. Pliocene–Early Pleistocene surfaces in the northwestern Negev – paleogeography and tectonic implications. Geological Survey of Israel Report GSI/26/86.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×