Alfano, M. (2013). Character as Moral Fiction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioural and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In Sanders, A. and Heuer, H. (eds.), Perspectives on Perception and Action. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 395–419.Google Scholar

Allport, A. (2011). Attention and integration. In Mole, C., Smithies, D., and Wu, W. (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 24–59.Google Scholar

Anand, P. and Hacquard, V. (2013). Epistemics and attitudes. Semantics and Pragmatics, 6 (8): 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, E. (2007). The epistemology of democracy. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 3 (1): 8–22.Google Scholar

Andrews, K., (2014). Animal cognition. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition), Zalta, E. N. (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/cognition-animal/.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33: 1–19.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1962). On sensations of position. Analysis, 22 (3): 55–58.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. (2006). The Evolution of Cooperation (Revised Edition). Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar

Bach, K. (1984). Default reasoning: Jumping to conclusions and knowing when to think twice. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65: 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, K. (2008). Applying pragmatics to epistemology. Philosophical Issues, 18: 68–88.Google Scholar

Bach, K. and Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bacon, W. F. and Egeth, H. E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23 (4): 948–961.Google Scholar

Baehr, J. (2011). The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual and Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., and Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54: 462–479.Google Scholar

Battaly, H. (2008). Virtue epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 3 (4): 639–663.Google Scholar

Berker, S. (2013a). Epistemic teleology and the separateness of propositions. Philosophical Review, 122 (3): 337–393.Google Scholar

Berker, S. (2013b). The rejection of epistemic consequentialism. Philosophical Issues, 23 (1): 363–387.Google Scholar

Bermudez, J. L. (2003). Thinking without Words. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. A. (1950/1996). Dexterity and Its Development. Edited by Latash, M. L. and Turvey, M. T.. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. (2001). Reason, virtue, and knowledge. In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. (2010). Success semantics. Practical Tortoise Raising: And Other Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 181–199.Google Scholar

Blum, L. A. (1986). Iris Murdoch and the domain of the moral. Philosophical Studies, 50 (3): 343–367.Google Scholar

Boghossian, P. (2000). Knowledge of logic. In Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford University Press, pp. 229–254.Google Scholar

Bonjour, L. (1980). Externalist theories of empirical knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5 (1): 53–73.Google Scholar

Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., and Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113 (2): 409.Google Scholar

Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brendel, E. (2009). The epistemic function of virtuous dispositions. In Damschen, G., Schnepf, R., and Stuber, K. R. (eds.), Debating Dispositions: Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind. New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 320–340.Google Scholar

Broncano, F. (2014). Daring to believe: Metacognition, epistemic agency and reflective knowledge. In Fairweather, A. (ed.), Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Burge, T. (2010). Origins of Objectivity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12: 187–192.Google Scholar

Cappelen, H. (2011). Against assertion. In Brown, J. and Cappelen, H. (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar

Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51 (13): 1484–1525.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cave, K. R. and Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6 (2): 204–223.Google Scholar

Chica, A. B., Bartolomeo, P., and Lupianez, J. (2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237: 107–123.Google Scholar

Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (2001). Internalism defended. In Kornblith, H. (ed.), Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 231–260.Google Scholar

Copp, D. (2006). On the agency of certain collective entities: An argument from “normative autonomy.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30 (1): 194–221.Google Scholar

Copp, D. (2007). The collective moral autonomy thesis. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38 (3): 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, E. (1990). Knowledge and the State of Nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1979). Moods and performances. In Margalit, A. (ed.), Meaning and Use. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. (1999). Intellectual biography. In Hahn, L. (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Library of Living Philosophers. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

de Sousa, R. (1987). The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

DeRose, K. (2002). Assertion, knowledge and context. Philosophical Review, 111 (2): 167–203.Google Scholar

DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dickie, I. (2011). Visual attention fixes demonstrative reference by eliminating referential luck. In Mole, C., Smithies, D. and Wu, W. (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 292–322.Google Scholar

Dickie, I. (2015). Fixing Reference. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2008). Judgment aggregation without full rationality. Social Choice and Welfare, 31 (1): 15–39.Google Scholar

Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., and Poeppel, D. (2015). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, doi:10.1038/nn.4186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobrynin, N. (1961). Basic problems of the psychology of attention. In Anan’yev, B. G. (ed.), Psychological Science in the USSR. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, pp. 274–291.Google Scholar

Dokic, J. and Engel, P. (2006). Frank Ramsey: Truth and Success. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Doris, J. (2002). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dormashev, Y. (2010). Flow experience explained on the grounds of an activity approach to attention. In Bruya, B. (ed.), Effortless Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 287–333.Google Scholar

Douven, I. (2006). Assertion, knowledge and rational credibility. Philosophical Review, 115: 449–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummet, M. (1981). Frege: Philosophy of Language (2nd Edition). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Engel, P. (2008). In what sense is knowledge the norm of assertion? Grazer Philosophische Studien, 77 (1): 45–59.Google Scholar

Fairweather, A. (2001). Epistemic motivation. In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar

Fairweather, A. and Montemayor, C. (2014a). Inferential abilities and common epistemic goods. In Fairweather, A. (ed.), Virtue Epistemology Naturalized: Bridges between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Vol. 366. Synthese Library. Springer, pp. 123–142.Google Scholar

Fairweather, A. and Montemayor, C. (2014b). Epistemic dexterity: A Ramseyian account of agent based knowledge. In Fairweather, A. and Flanagan, O. (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fairweather, A. and Alfano, M. (eds.), (2017). Epistemic Situationism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Firth, R. (1981). Epistemic merit, intrinsic and instrumental. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 55: 5–23. Presidential address delivered at the Annual Eastern Meeting of the American Philosophical Association in December, 1980. Reprinted in Firth 1998, 259–271. Page references are to the 1998 reprint.Google Scholar

Flanagan, O. (1991). Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres. In Pylyshyn, Z. W. (ed.), The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 139–149.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (2000). The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Foot, P. (1972). Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives. The Philosophical Review, 81 (3): 305–316.Google Scholar

Foot, P. (1978). Reasons for action and desires. In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 148–156.Google Scholar

Foot, P. (2002). Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1918–1919/1997). Thought. In Beany, M. (ed.), The Frege Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 325–345.Google Scholar

Fricker, M. (2010). 10. Can there be institutional virtues?. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 3: 235.Google Scholar

Graziano, M. S. (2013). Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty, Oxford University Pres.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62: 451–482.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Sturm, T. (2012). How (far) can rationality be naturalized? Synthese, 187 (1): 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, M. (1987). Modelling collective belief. Synthese, 73 (1): 185–204.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (1992). On Social Facts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (2006). A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glover, S. and Dixon, P. (2002). Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 146 (3): 383–387.Google Scholar

Glymour, C. (1987). Android epistemology and the frame problem: Comments on Dennett’s cognitive wheels. In Pylyshyn, Z. W. (ed.), The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 63–75.Google Scholar

Goddard, C. (2002). The search for the shared semantic core of all languages. In Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar – Theory and Empirical Findings, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 5–40.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. C. (2015). Assertion: On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (1992). Epistemic folkways and scientific epistemology. In Goldman, A. I. (ed.), Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 155–178.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2015). Reliabilism, veritism, and epistemic teleology. Episteme, 12: 131–143.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. and Olsson, E. (2009). Reliabilism and the value of knowledge. In Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar

Goodale, M. A. (2010). Transforming vision into action. Vision Research, 10 (1016): 7–27.Google Scholar

Graham, P. (2011). Psychological capacity and positive epistemic status. In Hernandez, J. G. (ed.), The New Intuitionism. Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 128–150.Google Scholar

Graham, P. (2014). Functions, warrant and history. In Fairweather, A. and Flanagan, O. (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–35.Google Scholar

Graham, P. J. (2012). Epistemic Entitlement. Noûs, 46: 449–482.Google Scholar

Greco, J. (2004). How to preserve your virtue while losing your perspective. In Greco, J. (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 96–105.Google Scholar

Greco, J. (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Greco, J. and Turri, J. (2011). Virtue Epistemology. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grimm, S. R. (2009). Epistemic normativity. In Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 243–264.Google Scholar

Gruber, M. J. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus – Dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84 (2): 486–496.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (2014). Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics at All? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. (eds.). (2009). Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haladjian, H. H. and Montemayor, C. (2015). On the evolution of conscious attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22 (3): 595–613.Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2000). The nonexistence of character traits. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 100: 223–226.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J. and Stanley, J. (2008). Knowledge and action. Journal of Philosophy, CV: 571–590.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519–530.Google Scholar

Hazlett, A. (2014). Expressivism and convention relativism about epistemic discourse. In Fairweather, A., and Flanagan, O. (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henderson, D. and Horgan, T. (2009). Epistemic virtues and cognitive dispositions. In Steuber, K., Damschen, G., and Schnepf, R. (eds.), Debating Dispositions: Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 296–319.Google Scholar

Henderson, D. and Horgan, T. (2011). The Epistemological Spectrum. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hommel, B. (2010). Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection. In Bruya, B. (ed.), Effortless Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 121–140.Google Scholar

Hookway, C. (2001). Epistemic akrasia and epistemic virtue. In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L. T. (eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford University Press, pp. 178–199.Google Scholar

Inan, I. (2012). The Philosophy of Curiosity. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Inan, I. (2014). Curiosity, belief and acquaintance. In Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Springer International Publishing, pp. 143–157.Google Scholar

Jones, W. (1997). Why do we value knowledge? American Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 423–439.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93 (5): 1449–1475.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47 (2): 263–291.Google Scholar

Klein, P. (2003). How a Pyrrhonian skeptic might respond to academic skepticism. In Luper, S. (ed.), The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. London: Ashgate Press, pp. 75–94.Google Scholar

Koch, C. and Crick, F. (2001). The zombie within. Nature, 411 (6840): 893.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. (1993). Epistemic normativity. Synthese, 94 (3): 357–376.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. (2000). The contextualist evasion of epistemology. Philosophical Issues, 10: 24–32.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and Its Place in Nature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. (2010). What reflective endorsement cannot do. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. O’Neill, O. (ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kvanvig, J. L. (2005). Truth and the epistemic goal. In Steup, M. and Sosa, E. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 285–295.Google Scholar

Kvanvig, J. L. (2009). Assertion, knowledge and lotteries. In Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D. (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 140–160.Google Scholar

Kvanvig, J. L. (2011). Norms of assertion. In Brown, J. and Cappelen, H. (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–250.Google Scholar

Lackey, J. (2007). Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know. Synthese, 158 (3): 345–361.Google Scholar

Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective epistemic virtues. Social Epistemology, 21 (3): 281–297.Google Scholar

Liberman, A. M., and Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (5): 187–196.Google Scholar

Lehrer, K. (1990). Theory of Knowledge. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Translated by Hall, M. J.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Lepock, C. (2014). Metacognition and intellectual virtue. In Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Springer International Publishing, pp. 33–48, 143–157.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (1997). Finkish dispositions. The Philosophical Quarterly, 47: 143–158.Google Scholar

List, C. (2012). Collective wisdom: A judgment aggregation perspective. In Landemore, H. and Elster, J. (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

List, C. and Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Littlejohn, C. and Turri, J. (eds.). (2014). Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief and Assertion. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacFarlane, J. (2007). Relativism and disagreement. Philosophical Studies, 132: 17–31.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, J. (2011). What is assertion? In Brown, J. and Cappelen, H. (eds.), Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, J. (2014). Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maitra, I. and Weatherson, B. (2010). Assertion, knowledge, and action. Philosophical Studies, 149: 99–118.Google Scholar

Manser, M. B., Bell, M. B., and Fletcher, L. B. (2001). The information that receivers extract from alarm calls in suricates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268: 2485–2491.Google Scholar

Mantel, S. (2013). Acting for reasons, apt action, and knowledge. Synthese, 190 (17): 3865–3888.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. (ed.). (1990). F. P. Ramsey: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. (1991). Matters of Metaphysics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Millikan, R. (2000). On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Misak, C. (2016). Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitova, V. (2011). Epistemic motivation: Towards a metaethics of belief. In Reisner, A. and Steglich-Petersen, A. (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–74.Google Scholar

Mole, C. (2006). Attention, self, and The Sovereignty of Good. In Rowe, A. (ed.), Iris Murdoch: A Reassessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 72–84.Google Scholar

Mole, C., Smithies, D., and Wu, W. (eds.). (2011). Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moltmann, F. (2014). Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43 (5): 679–701.Google Scholar

Montemayor, C. (2014). Success, minimal agency, and epistemic virtue. In Fairweather, A. (ed.), Virtue Epistemology Naturalized: Bridges Between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Vol. 366. Synthese Library. Springer, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar

Montemayor, C. and Haladjian, H. H. (2015). Consciousness, Attention, and Conscious Attention. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Montmarquet, J. A. (1993). Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Morton, A. (2012). Bounded Thinking: Intellectual Virtues for Limited Agents. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Murdoch, I. (1970). The Sovereignty of Good. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Nanay, B. (2013). Success semantics: The sequel. Philosophical Studies, 165: 151–165.Google Scholar

Neta, R. (2014). The epistemic ought. In Fairweather, A. and Flanagan, O. (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36–52.Google Scholar

Olin, L. and Doris, J. M. (2014). Vicious minds. Philosophical Studies, 168 (3): 665–692.Google Scholar

Owings, D. H. and Hennessy, D. F. (1984). The importance of variation in sciurid visual and vocal communication. In Murie, J. O. and Michener, G. R. (eds.), The Biology of Ground-Dwelling Squirrels. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 169–200.Google Scholar

Paul, L. (2014). Transformative Experience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pavese, C. (2015). Practical senses. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15 (29): 1–25.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. I. Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (eds.). Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Petitto, L. and Marentette, P. (1991). Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science, 251 (5000): 1493–1496.Google Scholar

Petitto, L. A., Berens, M. S., Kovelman, I., Dubins, M. H., Jasinska, K. and Shalinsky, M. (2012). The “Perceptual Wedge” hypothesis as the basis for bilingual babies’ phonetic processing advantage: New insights from fNIRS brain imaging. Brain and Language, 121 (2): 130–143.Google Scholar

Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Proust, J. (2012). Mental acts as natural kinds. In Clark, A., Kiverstein, J. and Vierkant, T. (eds.), Decomposing the Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 262–282.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. (2009). Knowledge, understanding and epistemic value. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 64: 19–43.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. (2012). Anti-luck virtue epistemology. Journal of Philosophy, 109: 247–279.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (ed.). (1987). The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Ablex.Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and Visualizing: It’s Not What You Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Epistemology Naturalized. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1927). Facts and propositions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 7 (1):153–170.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. (1931). Knowledge. In Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace, pp. 258–259.Google Scholar

Rescorla, M. (2009). Assertion and its constitutive norms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79 (1): 98–130.Google Scholar

Richard, M. (2004). Contextualism and relativism. Philosophical Studies, 119: 215–242.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, D. A. (2002). Motor control. In Pashler, H. (Series ed.) and Yantis, S. (Vol. ed.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (3rd Edition). New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 315–339.Google Scholar

Rudder-Baker, L. (2013). Naturalism and the First Person Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sahlin, N. E. (1990). The Philosophy of F. P. Ramsey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and Explanation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schlenker, P. (2010). Local contexts and local meanings. Philosophical Studies, 151: 115–142.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1985). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., and Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210 (4471): 801–803.Google Scholar

Seyfarth, R. M. and Cheney, D. L. (1990). The assessment by vervet monkeys of their own and another species’ alarm calls. Animal Behaviour, 40 (4): 754–764.Google Scholar

Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.) (2007). Moral Psychology (Vol. 2). The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Smith, P. (2003). Deflationism: The facts. In Lillehammer, H. and Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (eds.), Real Metaphysics. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 43–53.Google Scholar

Smithies, D. (2011). Attention is rational-access consciousness. In Mole, C., Smithies, D. and Wu, W. (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–273.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2000). Skepticism and contextualism. Philosophical Issues, 10: 1–18.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge (Volume I). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2009). Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2013). Epistemic agency. The Journal of Philosophy, 110 (11): 585–605.Google Scholar

Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment & Agency. Oxford University Press UK.Google Scholar

Stainton, R. (2006). Words and Thoughts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics, 9: 315–332.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25 (5): 701–721.Google Scholar

Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. (2011). Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steup, M., Turri, J., and Sosa, E. (eds.). (2013). Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73: 439–460.Google Scholar

Sylvan, K. and Sosa, E. (In Press). The place of reasons in epistemology. In Star, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Theeuwes, J. (2013). Feature-based attention: It is all bottom-up priming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 368 (1628): 20130055.Google Scholar

Turri, J. (2010). Epistemic invariantism and speech act contextualism. Philosophical Review, 119: 77–95.Google Scholar

Turri, J. (2011). Manifest failure: The Gettier problem solved. Philosophers’ Imprint, 11: 8.Google Scholar

Turri, J. (2013). The test of truth: An experimental investigation into the norm of assertion. Cognition, 129: 279–291.Google Scholar

Unger, P. (1975). Ignorance: A Case for Skepticism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Velleman, J. D. (1989). Practical Reflection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Velleman, J. D. (2007). What good is a will? In Leist, A. (ed.), Action in Context. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 193–215.Google Scholar

von Fintel, K. and Gillies, A. (2008). CIA leaks. Philosophical Review, 117 (1): 77–98.Google Scholar

von Fintel, K. and Gillies, A. (2011). ‘Might’ made right. In Egan, A. and Weatherson, B. (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–130.Google Scholar

von Frisch, K. (1953). The Dancing Bees: An Account of the Life and Senses of the Honey Bee. Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Weiner, M. (2005). Must we know what we say? The Philosophical Review, 114: 227–251.Google Scholar

Whitcomb, D. (2010). Curiosity was framed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81 (3): 664–687.Google Scholar

Whyte, J. T. (1990). Success semantics. Analysis, 50: 149–157.Google Scholar

Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Williamson, T. (1996). Knowing and asserting. Philosophical Review, 105 (4): 489–523.Google Scholar

Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. (eds.). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0 – A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1 (2): 202–238.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2001). On being in a quandry. Mind, 110: 45–98.Google Scholar

Wu, W. (2011). Attention as selection for action. In Mole, C., Smithies, D., and Wayne, W. (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar

Wu, W. (2013). Mental action and the threat of automaticity. In Clark, A., Kiverstein, J., and Vierkant, T. (eds.), Decomposing the Will. Oxford University Press, pp. 244–261.Google Scholar

Wu, W. (2015). Experts and deviants: The story of agentive control. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93 (1): 101–126.Google Scholar

Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Yaffe, G. (2010). Attempts: In the Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yalcin, S. (2007). Epistemic Modals. Mind, 116 (464): 983–1026.Google Scholar

Yalcin, S. (2011). Nonfactualism about epistemic modality. In Egan, A. and Weatherson, B. (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press, pp. 295–332.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, L. (2000). From reliabilism to virtue epistemology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 5: 173–179.Google Scholar

Zuberbühler, K. (2000). Referential labeling in Diana monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 59 (5): 917–927.Google Scholar