Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:06:39.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Preoperative evaluation

from Section II - Office interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

By
Catherine R. Salva  and
Onyi Onuoha
Edited by
Martin Olsen  and
Botros Rizk
Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Office Care of Women , pp. 61 - 71
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Age and Sex Composition: 2010 Census Briefs. [Internet]. 2011 [issued 2011 May, cited 2014 August 31]. Available from: www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf.Google Scholar
Heisler, CA, Aletti, GD, Weaver, AL, et al. Improving quality of care: development of a risk-adjusted perioperative morbidity model for vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:137.e1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Aug 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erekson, EA, Yip, SO, Martin, DK, et al. Major postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery: a clinical prediction model. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2012; 18(5):274–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, JA, Thompson, JD. TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Johnson, BE, Porter, J. Preoperative evaluation of the gynecologic patient: considerations for improved outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111(5):1183–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilic, G, Zivadinovic, R, Petric, A, Lilic, V. Preoperative preparation of patients for gynecologic surgery. Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Medicine in Nis 2011; 28(2):125–33.Google Scholar
Zambouri, A. Preoperative evaluation and preparation for anesthesia and surgery. Hippokratia 2007; 11(1):13–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Mann, WJ. Overview of preoperative evaluation and preparation for gynecologic surgery [Internet]. 2013 [updated 2014 Apr 28, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.uptodate.com.Google Scholar
Steege, JF, Siedhoff, MT. Clinical expert series: chronic pelvic pin. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:616–29.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Pelvic organ prolapse. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 85. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:717–29.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of adnexal masses. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 83. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:201–14.Google Scholar
Moore, RG, Miller, MC, Disilvestro, P, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(2):280–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with ovulatory dysfunction. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 136. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:176–85.Google Scholar
Howlader, N, Noone, AM, Krapcho, M, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (vintage 2009 populations), National Cancer Institute. Bethesda (MD) [Internet]. 2012 [updated 2012 Aug 20, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Power morcellation and occult malignancy in gynecologic surgery: a special report [Internet]. 2014 May [updated 2014 May; cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.acog.org/~/media/Task%20Force%20and%20Work%20Group%20Reports/MorecellationSpecialReport.pdf.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 144:1156–8.Google Scholar
Nieboer, TE, Johnson, N, Lethaby, A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8; 3:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.DC003677.pub4.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee on Ethics. Informed consent. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, PG, Cullen, BF, Stoelting, RK, et al. Clinical Anesthesia, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.Google Scholar
Dresner, N, Kurzman, AR. Preoperative evaluation and preparation of the gynecologic patient. Glob Libr Women’s Med (ISSN 1756–2228) 2008; doi: 10.3843/GLOWM.10423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunde, M, Suls, J, Martin, R, Barnett, K. Hystersisters online: social support and social comparison among hysterectomy patients on the internet. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31(3):271–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Srivastava, U. Role of routine laboratory investigations in preoperative evaluation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011; 27(2):174–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation [Internet]. 2014 [updated 2014, cited 2012 Jul 30]. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Five things physicians and patients should question. Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation [Internet]. 2013 [updated 2013 Feb 21, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-college-of-obstetricians-and-gynecologists.Google Scholar
American Society of Anesthesiologists: Five things physicians and patients should question. Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation [Internet]. 2013 [updated 2013, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-society-of-anesthesiologists.Google Scholar
Onuoha, OC, Arkoosh, VA, Fleisher, LA. Choosing Wisely in anesthesiology: the gap between evidence and practice. JAMA Intern Med 2014 Jun 16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2309. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, OD, Katz, J, Bass, EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:168–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benarroch-Gampel, J, Sheffield, KM, Duncan, CB, et al. Preoperative laboratory testing in patients undergoing elective, low-risk ambulatory surgery. Ann Surg 2012; 256(3):518–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, TH, Marcantonio, ER, Mangione, CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999; 100: 1043–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleisher, LA, Beckman, JA, Brown, KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Circulation 2007; 116:e418–500.Google Scholar
Karnath, B. Preoperative cardiac risk assessment. Am Fam Physician 2002; 66(10):1889–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Sheffield, KM, McAdams, PS, Benarroch-Gampel, J, et al. Overuse of preoperative cardiac stress testing in medicare patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 257(1):73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, R. Anesthetic management of the elderly patient. 53rd ASA Annual Meeting Refresher Course Lectures #321. 2002; p1–7.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 104. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1180–9.Google Scholar
Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection [Internet]. 1999 [updated, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Accessible from: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/gl_surgicalsite.html.Google Scholar
McElligott, KA, Havrilesky, LJ, Myers, ER. Preoperative screening strategies for bacterial vaginosis prior to elective hysterectomy: a cost comparison study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:500.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 84. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:429–40.Google Scholar
Browning, RM, Trentino, K, Nathan, EA, Hashemi, N, Western Australian Patient Blood Management Program. Preoperative anaemia is common in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery and is associated with a fivefold increased risk of transfusion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 52(5):455–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01478.x. Epub 2012 Sept 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, DM, Hochrieser, H, Posch, M, et al. Preoperative anaemia is associated with poor clinical outcome in non-cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113(3):416–23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu098. Epub 2014 May 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrier, SI, Mentzer, WC. Treatment of the adult with iron deficiency anemia [Internet]. 2014 [updated 2014 Aug 5, cited 2014 Aug 31]. Available from: www.uptodate.com.Google Scholar
Lethaby, A, Vollenhoven, B, Sowter, MC. Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 2:CD000547.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×