American Law Institute 1936. Restatement (First) of Property. St. Paul, Minn.: American Law Institute Publishers.Google Scholar

Arrunada, Benito 2012. Institutional Foundations of Impersonal Exchange. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, Douglas and Jackson, Thomas 1984. “Information, Uncertainty, and the Transfer of Property,” Journal of Legal Studies 13:299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bingham, Joseph W. 1915. “The Nature and Importance of Legal Possession,” Michigan Law Review 13:535–65.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien and Smith, Henry E. 2012. “An Economic Analysis of Common versus Civil Law Property,” Notre Dame Law Review 88(1):1–55.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1989. “A Hypothesis of Wealth–Maximizing Norms: Evidence from the Whaling Industry,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 5:83–97.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 2008. The Household: Informal Order around the Hearth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. and Thorland, Charles Dia. 1995. “Ancient Land Law: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Israel,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 71:321–411.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13: 1221–43.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 2002. “The Allocation of the Commons: Parking on Public Roads,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S515–44.Google Scholar

Fletcher, George 1976. “The Metamorphosis of the Larceny,” Harvard Law Review 89: 469–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordley, James and Mattei, Ugo 1996. “Protecting Possession,” American Journal of Comparative Law 44:293–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, Tom 1980. “The Disintegration of Property,” in NOMOS XXII: Property (Pennock, J. and Chapman, J. (eds.)). New York University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, D.R. 1961. “The Concept of Possession in English Law,” in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Guest, A.G. (ed.)). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard 1983. “Adverse Possession and Subjective Intent,” Washington University Law Quarterly 61:331–58.Google Scholar

Hickey, Robin 2010. Property and the Law of Finders. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881. The Common Law. Howe, Mark DeWolf (ed.) Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Jones, Owen D. and Brosnan, Sarah F. 2008. “Law, Biology and Property: A New Theory of the Endowment Effect,” William and Mary Law Review 49:1935–90.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Korobkin, Russell 2003. “The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis,” Northwestern University Law Review 97:1227–93.Google Scholar

LaFave, Wayne R. 2003. Criminal Law. 4th edn. St. Paul Minn.: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1985. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 79:1122–54.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1998. “Property and the Right to Exclude,” Nebraska Law Review 77:730–55.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2011. “The Property Prism,” Econ Journal Watch 8:247–53.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2012. “The Property Strategy,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160: 2061–95.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110:1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2001. “The Property/Contract Interface,” Columbia Law Review 101:773–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2007. “The Morality of Property,” William and Mary Law Review 48:1849–95.Google Scholar

Penner, J.E. 1997. The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick, and Maitland, Frederick William 1895. The History of English Law, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollock, Frederick, and Wright, Robert Samuel 1888. An Essay on Possession in the Common Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2000. “Savigny, Holmes, and the Law and Economics of Possession,” Virginia Law Review 86:535–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radin, Margaret Jane 1982. “Property and Personhood,” Stanford Law Review 34:957–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jr.Reisman, David 1939. “Possession and the Law of Finders,” Harvard Law Review 52:1105–34.Google Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1994. Property and Persuasion. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Salmond, John W. 1924. Jurisprudence. 7th edn. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar

Savigny, Freidrich Carol 1848. Von Savigny's Treatise on Possession. Translated by Sir Perry, Erskine. 6th edn. London: S. Sweet.Google Scholar

Shartel, Burke 1932. “Meanings of Possession,” Minnesota Law Review 16:611–37.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2003. “The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience,” Stanford Law Review 55:1105–91.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2005. “Self–Help and the Nature of Property,” Journal of Law, Economics & Policy 1:69–107.Google Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey Evans 2004. “The Property Instinct,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 359:1763–74.Google ScholarPubMed

Thayer, Albert S. 1907. “Possession and Ownership,” 23 Law Quarterly Review 175–93.Google Scholar

West, Mark D. 2003. “Losers: Recovering Lost Property in Japan and the United States,” Law & Society Review 37:369–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Lee J., Libecap, Gary D. and Mueller, Bernardo 1999. Titles, Conflict and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, Earl C. 1921. “The Law of Possession Governing Ferae Naturae,” American Law Review 55:393–404.Google Scholar

Berger, Bethany R. 2006. “It's Not About the Fox: The Untold History of Pierson v. Post,” Duke Law Journal 55:1089–1143.Google Scholar

Blackstone, William 1979 [1766]. Commentaries on the Laws of England, volume 2. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Jeremy M. 2014 “Speculative Accumulation: Property-Making in the Brazilian Amazon,” Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 19:237–59.Google Scholar

Cronon, William 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 57:347–59.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C., Rose, Carol M. and Smith, Henry C. 2014. Perspectives on Property Law. 4th edn. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Erickson, Amy Louise 2007. “Possession—And the Other One-Tenth of the Law: Assessing Women's Ownership and Economic Roles in Early Modern England,” Women's History Review 16:369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2006. “Efficient Trespass: The Case for Bad Faith Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 100:1037–96.Google Scholar

Fernandez, Angela 2009. “Pierson v. Post: A Great Debate, James Kent, and the Project of Building a Learned Law for New York State,” Law and Social Inquiry 34:301–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Daniel 2006. “Evolution and Chaos in Property Rights Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access,” Yale Law Journal 115:996–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossfeld, Bernhard and Hiller, Jack A. 2008. “Music and Law,” International Lawyer 42: 1147–80.Google Scholar

Helmholz, Richard 1983. “Adverse Possession and Subjective Intent,” Washington University Law Quarterly 61:331–58.Google Scholar

Klass, Alexandra B. 2006. “Adverse Possession and Conservation: Expanding Traditional Notions of Use and Possession,” University of Colorado Law Review 77:283–333.Google Scholar

Kochevar, Steven 2013. “Adverse Possession as a Means of Assessing Community Approval,” Unpublished paper, on file with the author.Google Scholar

Krier, James E. 2009. “Evolutionary Theory and the Origins of Property Rights,” Cornell Law Review 95:139–59.Google Scholar

Levack, Brian P. 1995. “Possession, Witchcraft, and the Law in Elizabethan England,” Washington and Lee Law Review 52:1613–40.Google Scholar

McDowell, Andrea 2007. “Legal Fictions in Pierson v. Post,” Michigan Law Review 105:735–77.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1984. “Property Rules, Liability Rules and Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 79:1122–54.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2007. Property: Principles and Policies. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Meyers, Gary D. and Raine, Sally, “Australian Aboriginal Land Rights in Transition (Part II): The Legislative Response to the High Court's Native Title Decisions in Mabo v. Queensland and Wik v. Queensland,” Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law 9:95–167.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Kristen 2003. “Market-assisted Land Reform in Brazil: A New Approach to Address an Old Problem,” New York University Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 22:557–83.Google Scholar

Morawetz, Jennie 2011. “No Room for Squatters: Alaska's Adverse Possession Law,” Alaska Law Review 28:341–70.Google Scholar

Peñalver, Eduardo Moisés and Katyal, Sonia K. 2007, “Property Outlaws,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 155:1095–1186.Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick and Wright, Robert Samuel 1888. An Essay on Possession in the Common Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pyne, Stephen J. 2001. Fire: A Brief History. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1998. “Canons of Property Talk, or, Blackstone's Anxiety,” Yale Law Journal 108: 601–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 2013. “Psychologies of Property (and Why Property is Not a Hawk-Dove Game),” in Penner, J. E., and Smith, H.E. (eds), The Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skyrms, Brian. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2003. “The Language of Property: Form, Context and Audience,” Stanford Law Review 55:1105–91.Google Scholar

Sprankling, John E. 1994. “An Environmental Critique of Adverse Possession,” Cornell Law Review 79:816–84.Google Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey Evans 2001. “The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession,” Georgetown Law Journal 89:2419–73.Google Scholar

Sugden, Robert 2004 [1986] The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. 2006 Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy 2013. “‘To Bestow Stability Upon Possession’: Hume's Alternative to Locke,” in Penner, J.E., and Smith, H.E., (eds.) The Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wenar, Leif 2008. “Property Rights and the Resource Curse,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36:2–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alberti, Federica, Sugden, Robert, and Tsutsui, Kei 2012. “Salience as an Emergent Property,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 82:379–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, Armen A. 1965. “Some Economics of Property Rights,” Il Politico 30:816–29, reprinted in Alchian, Armen A. 1977. Economic Forces at Work 127–49. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, Gregory S. 2009. “The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law,” Cornell Law Review 94:745–820.Google Scholar

Anderson, Terry L. and Hill, P.J. 1975. “The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West,” Journal of Law & Economics 18:163–80.Google Scholar

Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, translated by Ross, David trans., revised by Ackrill, J.L. and Urmson, J.O.. Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Arruñada, Benito. Chapter 8, this volume. “The Titling Role of Possession.”Google Scholar

Austin, Lisa M. 2013. “Possession and the Distractions of Philosophy,” in The Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Penner, J. E. and Smith, Henry E., (eds.), Oxford University Press, pp. 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayres, Ian and Gertner, Robert 1989. “Filling in Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules,” Yale Law Journal 99:87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, Douglas and Jackson, Thomas 1984. “Information, Uncertainty, and the Transfer of Property,” Journal of Legal Studies 13:299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Carliss Y. and Clark, Kim B. 2000. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barzel, Yoram 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Bethany R. 2006. “It's Not About the Fox: The Untold History of Pierson v. Post,” Duke Law Journal 55:1089–43.Google Scholar

Bingham, Joseph W. 1915. “The Nature and Importance of Legal Possession,” Michigan Law Review 13:535–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackstone, William 1766. Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2015 forthcoming. “An Economic and Comparative Analysis of Specificatio (the Accession Doctrine)”, European Journal of Law and Economics 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien Chapter 4, this volume. “The Economy of Concept and Possession.”Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien and Smith, Henry E. 2012. “An Economic Analysis of Common versus Civil Law Property,” Notre Dame Law Review 88:1–55Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien and Smith, Henry E. 2015 forthcoming. “Structure and Style in Comparative Property Law,” in Research Handbook on Comparative Law and Economics, Ramello, Giovanni B. and Eisenberg, Theodore (eds.), Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, Steven N.S. 1970. “The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource,” Journal of Law & Economics 13:49–70.Google Scholar

Claeys, Eric R. 2013. “Productive Use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory,” in Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Penner, James and Smith, Henry E. (eds.), Oxford University Press, pp. 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Felix S. 1935. “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” Columbia Law Review 35:809–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Felix S. 1954. “Dialogue on Private Property,” Rutgers Law Journal 9:357–87.Google Scholar

Corriel, Matt 2013. “Up for Grabs: A Workable System for the Unilateral Acquisition of Chattels,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161:807–60.Google Scholar

Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John 2006. “Evolutionary Psychology, Moral Heuristics, and the Law,” in Heuristics and the Law, Gigerenzer, G. and Engel, C. (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dagan, Hanoch 2011. Property: Values and Institutions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, Harold 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review 57 (2):347–59.Google Scholar

Dernburg, Heinrich 1900. Pandekten, vol. 1, part 2. 6th edn., with the assistance of Johannes Bierman. Berlin: H.W. Müller.Google Scholar

Dorigo, Marco 1991. “New Perspectives About Default Hierarchies Formation in Learning Classifier Systems,” in Trends in Artificial Intelligence: 2nd Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Edoardo Ardizzone et al. (eds.) 218–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eggertsson, Thráinn 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1989. “A Hypothesis of Wealth-Maximizing Norms: Evidence from the Whaling Industry,” Journal of Law & Economics 5:83–97.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 2011. “The Inevitable Trend Toward Universally Recognizable Signals of Property Claims: An Essay for Carol Rose,” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 19:1015–32.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13:1221–44.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 2002. “The Allocation of the Commons: Parking on Public Roads,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S515–44.Google Scholar

Ernst, Daniel R. 2009. “Pierson v. Post: The New Learning,” Green Bag (2nd ser.) 13:31–42.Google Scholar

Essert, Christopher 2013. “The Office of Ownership,” University of Toronto Law Journal 64:418–61.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. 2008 “Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology 59:255–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fernandez, Angela 2009a. “The Lost Record of Pierson v. Post, The Famous Fox Case,” Law and History Review 27:149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernandez, Angela 2009b. “Pierson v. Post: A Great Debate, James Kent, and the Project of Building a Learned Law for New York State,” Law & Social Inquiry 34:301–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finberg, James M. 1982. “The General Mining Law and the Doctrine of Pedis Possessio: The Case For Congressional Action,” University of Chicago Law Review 49:1026–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forman, William J., Dwyer, Robert G., and Fox, C. Robert 1970. “Judicial Uncertainties in Applying the Mining Doctrine of ‘Pedis Possessio’,” Natural Resources Lawyer 3:467–74.Google Scholar

Foster, Nigel G. and Sule, Satish 2010. German Legal System and Laws. 4th edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, David. 1994. “A Positive Account of Property Rights,” Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Ori and Neary, Karen R. 2009. “First Possession Beyond the Law: Adults’ and Young Children's Intuitions About Ownership,” Tulane Law Review 83:679–90.Google Scholar

Gold, Andrew S. and Smith, Henry E.. “How Private Law is Simply Moral.”Google Scholar

Goldberg, John C.P. 2012. “Introduction: Pragmatism and Private Law,” Harvard Law Review 125:1640–63.Google Scholar

Gordley, James and Mattei, Ugo 1996. “Protecting Possession,” American Journal of Comparative Law 44:293–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grey, Thomas C. 1980. “The Disintegration of Property,” in NOMOS XXII: Property, Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), New York University Press, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul H. 1975. “Logic and Conversation,” in Speech Acts (Syntax and Semantics 3), Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–59. Reprinted in Grice, Paul 1989. Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haddock, David D. and Kiesling, Lynne 2002. “The Black Death and Property Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S545–87.Google Scholar

Hayes, Bruce 2009. Introductory Phonology. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heck, Philipp 1930. Grundriß des Sachenrechts. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1820. Hegel's Philosophy of Right, translated by Knox, T.M.. Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Heylighen, Francis 1999. “Advantages and Limitations of Formal Expression,” Foundations of Science 4:25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, John H., Holyoak, Keith J., Nisbett, Richard E., and Thagard, Paul R. 1986. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David 1739–40. A Treatise of Human Nature Selby-Bigge, L.A. (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896.Google Scholar

Katz, Larissa 2010. “The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession,” McGill Law Journal 55:47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Daniel B. 2015. “Dividing Possessory Rights,” in Law and Economics of Possession, Chang, Yun-chien (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Dudley 1983. “Hegel on Property and Personality,” Philosophical Quarterly 33:45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krier, James E. 2009. “Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights,” Cornell Law Review 95:139–59.Google Scholar

Krier, James E., Serkin, Christopher, 2015. “Possession and Ownership,” in Law and Economics of Possession, Chang, Yun-chien, (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Langlois, Richard N. 2002. “Modularity in Technology and Organization,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 49:19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levmore, Saul 1987. “Variety and Uniformity in the Treatment of the Good-Faith Purchaser,” Journal of Legal Studies 16:43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John 1689. Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, Peter (ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lueck, Dean 1995. “The Rule of First Possession and the Design of the Law,” Journal of Law & Economics 38:393–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manning, John F. 2011. “Separation of Powers as Ordinary Interpretation,” Harvard Law Review 124:1939–2040.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, Andrea 2007. “Legal Fictions in Pierson v. Post,” Michigan Law Review 105:735–78.Google Scholar

McFarlane, Ben 2008. The Structure of Property Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1998. “Property and the Right to Exclude,” Nebraska Law Review 77:730–55.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2001a. “The Property/Contract Interface,” Columbia Law Review 101:773–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2001b. “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?” Yale Law Journal 111:357–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2007. “The Morality of Property,” William & Mary Law Review 48:1849–95.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2009. “Accession and Original Ownership,” Journal of Legal Analysis 1:459–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2015. “Possession and Ownership,” in Law and Economics of Possession, Chang, Yun-chien, (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110:1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Marvin 1975. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge,” in The Psychology of Computer Vision, Winston, Patrick Henry (ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Moselle, Boaz and Polak, Benjamin 2001. “A Model of a Predatory State,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 17:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mossoff, Adam 2002. “Locke's Labor Lost,” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 9:155–64.Google Scholar

Mossoff, Adam 2011. “The False Promise of the Right to Exclude,” Econ Journal Watch 8 (3):255–64.Google Scholar

Newman, Christopher M. 2009. “Patent Infringement as Nuisance,” Catholic University Law Review 59:61–123.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development,” American Political Science Review 87:567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qiao, Shitong. 2014. “Small Property, Big Market: A Focal Point Explanation” (February 21, 2014). American Journal of Comparative Law 63, No. 1 (2015) Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2399675.Google Scholar

Penner, J.E. 1997. The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Peterson, Dale 2011. The Moral Lives of Animals. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven 1999. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick 1896. A First Book of Jurisprudence. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pollock, Frederick and Wright, Robert Samuel 1888. An Essay on Possession in the Common Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1976. “Blackstone and Bentham,” Journal of Law & Economics 19:569–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2000. “Holmes, Savigny, and the Law and Economics of Possession,” Virginia Law Review 86: 535–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rixecker, Roland and Säcker, Franz Jürgen. 2012. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1991. “Rethinking Environmental Controls: Management Strategies for Common Resources.” Duke Law Journal:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 2015. “The Law is Nine-tenths of Possession: An Adage Turned on its Head,” in Law and Economics of Possession, Chang, Yun-chien, (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Wasow, Thomas, and Bender, Emily M. 2003. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. 2nd edn. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Savigny, Friedrich Carl 1848. Von Savigny's Treatise on Possession; or the Jus Possessionis of the Civil Law. Translated by Sir Perry, Erskine. 6th edn. London: S. Sweet.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shartel, Burke 1932. “Meanings of Possession,” Minnesota Law Review 16:611–37.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert A. 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam 1762–63. Lectures on Jurisprudence, Meek, R.L. et al. (eds.), Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1978, pp. 9–86.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry 1996. Restrictiveness in Case Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2002. “Exclusion Versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S453–87.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2003. “The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience,” Stanford Law Review 55:1105–91.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2005. “Self-Help and the Nature of Property,” Journal of Law, Economics & Policy 1:69–146.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2007 “Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information.” Yale Law Journal 116:1742–1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2009. “Community and Custom in Property,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10:5–41.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2012a. “On the Economy of Concepts in Property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:2097–128.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2012b. “Property as the Law of Things,” Harvard Law Review 125:1691–1726.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2013. “Emergent Property,” in Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Penner, James and Smith, Henry E. (eds.), Oxford University Press, pp. 320–38.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. ms. “An Economic Analysis of Law versus Equity.”Google Scholar

Sprankling, John G. 1996. “The Antiwilderness Bias in American Property Law,” University of Chicago Law Review 63:519–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, Robert 2004 [1986]. The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sugden, Robert 2011. “Mutual Advantage, Conventions and Team Reasoning,” International Review of Economics 58:9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinnen, Koen 2012. “Property Law Accessories under the DCFR,” in The Draft Common Frame of Reference: national and comparative perspectives, Sagaert, Vincent, Storme, Matthias, and Terryn, Evelyne (eds.), Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 289–302.Google Scholar

Umbeck, John 1981. “Might Makes Rights: A Theory of the Formation and Initial Distribution of Property Rights,” Economic Inquiry 19:38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy 1983. “Two Worries About Mixing One's Labour,” Philosophical Quarterly 33:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yiannopoulos, A.N. 1994. “Civil Liability for Abuse of Right: Something Old, Something New…,” Louisiana Law Review 54:1173–97.Google Scholar

Yiannopoulos, A.N. 2001. Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Property, vol. 2, 4th edn. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar

Austin, Lisa M. 2013. “Possession and the Distractions of Philosophy,” in The Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, Penner, James E. and Smith, Henry E., (eds.) Oxford University Press, pp. 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, Norman 2004. “Property Rights in Common and Civil Law,” in The Elgar Companion to the Economics of Property Rights, Colombatto, Enrico, (ed.) Northampton, MA.: Edward Elgar, pp. 177–96.Google Scholar

Baur, Jürgen and Stürner, Rolf 2009. Sachenrecht. 18th edn. München: Beck.Google Scholar

Bell, John, Bell, Andrew and Boyron, Sophie 2008. “Property Law,” in Principles of French Law Bell, John, Boyron, Sophie and Whittaker, Simon, (eds.) Oxford University Press, pp. 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouckaert, Boudewijn and De Geest, Gerrit 1998. “The Economic Functions of Possession and Limitation Statutes,” in Essays in Law & Economics IV, Ott, Claus and von Wangenheim, Georg, (eds.) Antwerpen: Maklu, pp. 151–68.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2012. “Property Law with Chinese Characteristics: An Economic and Comparative Analysis,” Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 1:345–72.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien, Chen, Kong-pin, Lin, and Lin, Chang-ching 2014. “Anchoring Effect in Real Litigation,” working paper.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien and Smith, Henry E. 2012. “An Economic Analysis of Common versus Civil Law Property,” Notre Dame Law Review 88 (1):1–55.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2015a “Structure and Style in Comparative Property Law,” in Research Handbook on Comparative Law and Economics, edited by Ramello, Giovanni B. and Eisenberg, Theodore, (eds.) Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2015b “The Numerus Clausus Principle, Property Customs, and the Emergence of New Property Forms,” Iowa Law Review 100, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Dukeminier, Jesse, Krier, James E. Alexander, Gregory, S. and Schill, Michael H. 2010. Property. 7th edn. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1993. “Property in Land,” Yale Law Journal 102:1315–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 2011. “Two Cheers for the Bundle-of-Sticks Metaphor, Three Cheers for Merrill and Smith,” Econ Journal Watch 8 (3):215–22.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13:1221–44.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1998. “Possession,” in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Newman, Peter, (ed.) New York, NY: Stockton, pp. 62–68.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1999. Torts. New York, NY: Aspen.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 2005. “The Theory and Practice of Self-Help,” Journal of Law, Economics & Policy 1:1–31.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 2011. “Bundle-of-Rights Theory as a Bulwark Against Statist Conceptions of Private Property,” Econ Journal Watch 8 (3):223–35.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2010. “Possession Puzzle,” in Powell on Real Property, Wolf, Michael Allan, (ed.) New York, NY: Lexis-Nexus, pp. WFL10–1–WFL10–20.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2012. “Lumpy Property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:1955–93.Google Scholar

Field, Erica 2003. “Property Rights, Community Public Goods, and Household Time Allocation in Urban Squatter Communities: Evidence from Peru,” William & Mary Law Review 45:837–87.Google Scholar

Gambaro, Antonio and Mattei, Ugo 2002. “Property Law,” in Introduction to Italian Law, Lena, Jeffrey S. and Mattei, Ugo, (eds.) The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 283–316.Google Scholar

Gordley, James 2006. Foundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust Enrichment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordley, James and Von Mehren, Arthur Taylor 2006. An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Private Law: Readings, Cases, Materials. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier 2002. “Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S373–S420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinteregger, Monika 2012. “The Protection of Property Rights,” in Cases, Materials and Text on Property Law, Van Erp, Sjef and Akkermans, Bram, (eds.) Oxford: Hart, pp. 97–210.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881. The Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Honoré, A.M. 1961. “Ownership,” in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: A Collaborative Work, Guest, A.G., (ed.) Oxford University Press, pp. 107–47.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kleijn, W.M. Jordaans, J.P. Krans, H.B. Ploeger, H.D. and Steketee, F.A. (revised by Choros, J.M.J.) 2006. “Property Law,” in Introduction to Dutch Law, Chorus, J.M.J., Gerver, Piet-Hein and Hondius, Ewoud, (eds.) The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 103–34.Google Scholar

Kohler, Jürgen 2005. “Property Law (Sachenrecht),” in Introduction to German Law, Zekoll, Joachim and Reimann, Mathias, (eds.) The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, pp. 227–49.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110:1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E. 2012. Property: Principles and Policies. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2000. “Savigny, Holmes, and the Law and Economics of Possession,” Virginia Law Review 86:535–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark and Nakazato, Minoru 1999. Japanese Law: An Economic Approach. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1988. “Crystals and Mud in Property Law,” Stanford Law Review 40: 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savigny, Friedrich Carl 1848. Von Savigny's Treatise on Possession; or the Jus Possessionis of the Civil Law. Translated by Sir Perry, Erskine. 6th edn. London: S. Sweet.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Allan and Scott, Robert E. 2011. “Rethinking the Laws of Good Faith Purchase,” Columbia Law Review 111:1332–84.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2005. “Self-Help and the Nature of Property,” The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy 1:69–146.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2011a. “Property Is Not Just a Bundle of Rights,” Econ Journal Watch 8 (3):279–91.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2011b. “Standardization in Property Law,” in Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law, Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E., (eds.) Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 148–73.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2012a. “On the Economy of Concepts in Property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160:2097–128.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2012b. “Property as the Law of Things,” Harvard Law Review 125:1691–726.Google Scholar

Steiner, Eva 2010. French Law: A Comparative Approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Strahilevitz, Lior 2010. “The Right to Abandon,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158:355–420.Google Scholar

Strahilevitz, Lior 2011. “Unilateral Relinquishment of Property,” in Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law, Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E., (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 125–47.Google Scholar

Terre, Francois and Philippe, Simler 2006. Droit Civil: Les Biens. 7th edn. Paris: Dalloz-Sirey.Google Scholar

Wang, Tze-chien 2010. Taiwan's Property Law. Taipei: San Min Press.Google Scholar

Wolf, Manfred 2001. Sachenrecht. 18th edn. Muenchen: Beck.Google Scholar

Abeler, Johannes, Falk, Armin, Goette, Lorenz and Huffman, David 2011. “Reference Points and Effort Provision,” American Economic Review 101:470–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, John 2009. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach. 9th edn. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Alterman, Rachelle 2010. Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights. Chicago: American Bar Association Publishing.Google Scholar

Arieli, Dan and Simonson, Itamar 2003. “Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 13:113–23.Google Scholar

Baron, Jonathan and Ritov, Ilana 1994. “Reference Points and Omission Bias,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59:475–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barros, D. Benjamin 2006. “Home as a Legal Concept,” Santa Clara Law Review 46:255–306.Google Scholar

Beggan, James K. 1992. “On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belk, Russell W. 1988. “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research 15:139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, Jeremy A. 2007. “Emotional Paternalism,” Florida State University Law Review 35:1–72.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Jeremy A. 2009. “‘To Be Human:’ A Psychological Perspective on Property Law,” Tulane Law Review 83:609–44.Google Scholar

Bradbury, Jack W. and Vehrencamp, Sandra L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Brenner, Lyle, Rottenstreich, Yuval, Sood, Sanjay and Bilgin, Baler 2007. “On the Psychology of Loss Aversion: Possession, Valence, and Reversals of the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Consumer Research 34:369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byun, Sang-Eun and Sternquist, Brenda 2008. “The Antecedents of In-Store Hoarding: Measurement and Application in the Fast Fashion Retail Environment,” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 18:133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byun, Sang-Eun and Sternquist, Brenda 2012. “Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: Consumer Reactions to Perceived Limited Availability,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20:223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, Colin 1995. “Individual Decision Making,” in Kagel, John H. and Roth, Alvin E. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, pp. 587–703.Google Scholar

Camerer, Colin, Babcock, Linda, Loewenstein, George and Thaler, Richard 1997. “Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:407–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, David and Knetsch, Jack L. 1992. “Judicial Choice and Disparities between Measures of Economic Values,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 30:737–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Rochberg-Halton, Eugene 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbs, Dan B. 2000. The Law of Torts. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1989. “Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 65:23–56.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13:1221–43.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1998. “Possession,” in Newman, Peter (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and The Law, vol. 3. New York: Stockton Press. pp. 62–68.Google Scholar

Feldman, Yuval, Schurr, Amos and Teichman, Doron 2013. “Reference Points and Contractual Choices: An Experimental Examination,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10:512–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2003. “Death, Taxes, and Cognition,” North Carolina Law Review 81:567–652.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton R. 1997. Friedman on Leases. 4th edn. New York: Practicing Law Institute.Google Scholar

Galin, Amira, Gross, Miron, Kela-Egozi, Irit and Sapir, Sigal 2006. “The Endowment Effect on Academic Chores Trade-Off (ACTO),” Theory and Decision 60:335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godsil, Rachel D. 2004. “Viewing the Cathedral from Behind the Color Line: Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Environmental Racism,” Emory Law Journal 53:1807–85.Google Scholar

Hammack, Judd and Brown, Gardner M. Jr. 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Washington DC: RFF Press.Google Scholar

Heyman, James E., Orhun, Yesim and Ariely, Dan 2004. “Auction Fever: The Effect of Opponents and Quasi-Endowment on Product Valuations,” Journal of Interactive Marketing 18:7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Elizabeth and Spitzer, Matthew 1993. “Willingness to Pay vs. Willingness to Accept: Legal and Economic Implications,” Washington University Law Review 71:59–114.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881. The Common Law. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Isoni, Andrea, Loomes, Graham and Sugden, Robert 2011. “The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect’, Subject misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment,” American Economic Review 101:991–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jolls, Christine and Sunstein, Cass R. 2006. “Debiasing Through Law,” Journal of Legal Studies 35:199–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel 1992. “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51:296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 1986. “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics,” in Reder, Robin M. and Hogarth, Melvin R. (eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. University of Chicago Press, pp. 101–16.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy 98:1325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 1991. “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5:193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L. and Thaler, Richard H. 2008. “The Endowment Effect: Evidence of Losses Valued More than Gains,” in Plott, Charles R. and Smith, Vernon L. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland publishing, pp. 939–55.Google Scholar

Keeton, W. Page, Dobbs, Dan B., Keeton, Robert E. and Owen, David G. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. 5th edn. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kelly, James J. Jr. 2006. “‘We Shall Not Be Moved’: Urban Communities, Eminent Domain and the Socioeconomics of Just Compensation,” St. John's L. Rev. 80:923–90.Google Scholar

Knetsch, Jack L. and Sinden, J. A. 1984. “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99:507–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knetsch, Jack L. and Wong, Wei-Kang 2009. “The Endowment Effect and the Reference State: Evidence and Manipulations,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71:407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korobkin, Russell B. 1998. “The Status Quo Bias and Contract Default Rules,” Cornell Law Review 83:608–87.Google Scholar

Korobkin, Russell B. 2003. “The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis,” Northwestern University Law Review 97:1227–93.Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. 2005. “Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding,” Texas Law Review 83:1031–76.Google Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 1996. “Compensation for Injuries to Land Caused by Planning Authorities: Towards a Comprehensive Theory,” University of Toronto Law Journal 46:47–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 2001. “Contemporary Property Law Scholarship: A Comment,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2:97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 2003. “The Objectivity of Well-Being and the Objectives of Property Law,” New York University Law Review 78:1669–1754.Google Scholar

Marzilli Ericson, Keith M. and Fuster, Andreas 2011. “Expectations as Endowments: Evidence on Reference-Dependent Preferences from Exchange and Valuation Experiments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126:1879–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1985. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 79:1122–54.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 2005. The Kelo Decision: Investigating Takings of Homes and Other Private Property: Hearing Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 109^th Congress 122 (testimony of Merrill, Thomas W., Professor, Columbia University Law School).Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. 1967. “Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law,” Harvard Law Review 80:1165–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morewedge, Carey K., Shu, Linda L, Gilbert, Daniel T. and Wilson, Timothy D. 2009. “Bad Riddance or Good Rubbish? Ownership and not Loss Aversion Causes the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:947–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadler, Janice, and Seidman Diamond, Shari 2008. “Eminent Domain and the Psychology of Property Rights: Proposed Use, Subjective Attachment, and Taker Identity,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5:713–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortona, Guido and Scacciati, Francesco 1992. “New Experiments on the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Economic Psychology 13:277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, Joann and Shu, Suzanne B. 2009. “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research 36:434–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, Joann, Barger, Victor A. and Webb, Andrea 2013. “In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 23:189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, Jon L., Kostova, Tatiana and Dirks, Kurt T. 2003. “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research,” Review of General Psychology 7:84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, Charles R. and Zeiler, Kathryn 2005. “The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect’, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations,” American Economic Review 95:530–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, Charles R., and Zeiler, Kathryn 2007. “Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory?,” American Economic Review 97:1449–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law. 8th edn. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Reb, Jochen and Connolly, Terry 2007. “Possession, Feelings of Ownership and the Endowment Effect,” Judgment and Decision Making 2:107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, Charles 1964. “The New Property,” Yale Law Journal 73:733–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritov, Ilana and Baron, Jonathan 1990. “Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3:263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritov, Ilana and Baron, Jonathan 1992. “Status-Quo and Omission Biases,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52:73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 2000. “Left Brain, Right Brain and History in the New Law and Economics of Property,” Oregon Law Review 79:417–92.Google Scholar

Schoshinski, Robert S. 1980. American Law of Landlord and Tenant. Rochester: The Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Sen, Sankar and Johnson, Eric J. 1997. “Mere-Possession Effects without Possession in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research. 24:105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serkin, Christopher 2009. “Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations,” New York University Law Review 84:1222–91.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Scott and McClennen, Edward F. 1998. “Law-and-Economics from a Philosophical Perspective,” in Newman, Peter (ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, vol. 2, New York: Macmillan Reference Limited, pp. 460–65.Google Scholar

Shavell, Steven 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shu, Suzzane B. and Peck, Joann 2011. “Psychological Ownership and Affective Reaction: Emotional Attachment Process Variables and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 21:439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey E. 2001. “The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession,” Georgetown Law Journal 89:2419–74.Google Scholar

Sterk, Stewart E. 1987. “Neighbors in American Land Law,” Columbia Law Review 87:55–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Stephanie M. 2009. “Residential Protectionism and the Legal Mythology of Home,” Michigan Law Review 107:1093–1144.Google Scholar

Stern, Stephanie M. 2010. “The Inviolate Home: Housing Exceptionalism in the Fourth Amendment,” Cornell Law Review 95:905–56.Google Scholar

Stern, Stephanie M. 2011. “Reassessing the Citizen Virtues of Homeownership,” Columbia Law Review 111:890–938.Google Scholar

Strahilevitz, Michal A. and Loewenstein, George 1998. “The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects,” Journal of Consumer Research 25:276–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. “Switching the Default Rule,” New York University Law Review 77:106–34.Google Scholar

Tom, Gail, Lopez, Stephanie and Demir, Kivilcim 2006. “A Comparison of the Effect of Retail Purchase and Direct Marketing on the Endowment Effect,” Psychology and Marketing 23:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, Eric and van Knippenberg, Daan 1996. “Buying and Selling Exchange Goods: Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Economic Psychology 17:517–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, Eric and van Knippenberg, Daan 1998. “Trading Wine: On the Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Comparability of Consumer Goods,” Journal of Economic Psychology 19:485–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, James R., Arkes, Hal R. and Muhanna, Waleed A. 2008. “The Power of Touch: An Examination of the Effect of Duration of Physical Contact on the Valuation of Objects,” Judgment and Decision Making 3:476–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamir, Eyal 2012. “Loss Aversion and the Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 65:829–94.Google Scholar

Alexander, Gregory S. 2009a. “The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law,” Cornell Law Review 94: 745–819.Google Scholar

Alexander, Gregory S. 2009b. “The Complex Core of Property,” Cornell Law Review 94: 1063–71.Google Scholar

Alexander, Gregory S. and Peñalver, Eduardo M. 2009. “Properties of Community,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10: 127–60.Google Scholar

Blackstone, William 1765–1769. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Various Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowles, Samuel 2004. Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien and Smith, Henry E. 2012. “An Economic Analysis of Civil Versus Common Law Property,” Notre Dame Law Review 88: 1–55.Google Scholar

Cook, Walter Wheeler 1935. “Ownership and Possession.” in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 11: 521.Google Scholar

Dagan, Hanoch 1999. “Takings and Distributive Justice,” Virginia Law Review 85: 741–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dagan, Hanoch 2007. “The Social Responsibility of Ownership,” Cornell Law Review 92: 1255–73.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 57: 347–57.Google Scholar

Dukeminier, Jesse, Krier, James E., Alexander, Gregory S., and Schill, Michael H. 2010. Property. 7th edn. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1989. “Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 65: 23–55.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order without Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 2013. “Stone-Age Property in Domestic Animals,” Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal 2: 1–25.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” Georgia Law Review 13: 1221–43.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 2006. “The Optimal Complexity of Legal Rules” in Gigerenzer, and Engel, (eds.) (2006) 141–58.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton 1982. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Ori and Neary, Karen R. 2008. “Determining Who Owns What: Do Children Infer Ownership from First Possession?,” Cognition 107: 829–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gigerenzer, Gerd and Engel, Christoph (eds.) 2006. Heuristics and the Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale, and Kahneman, Daniel (eds.) 2002. The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gordley, James and Matte, Ugo 1996. “Protecting Possession,” American Journal of Comparative Law 44: 293–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan (Rapporteur) 2006. “Group Report: What Is the Role of Heuristics in Making Law?” in Gigerenzer and Engel (eds.) (2006) 239–57.Google Scholar

Hirschleifer, Jack 1982 “Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation Versus Conflict Strategies,” Research in Law and Economics 4: 1–60.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1881/1938. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1897. “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10: 457–78.Google Scholar

Hume, David 1740/2005. A Treatise of Human Nature. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar

Huskinson, Lucy and Schmidt, Bettina E. 2010. “Introduction” in Spirit Possession and Trance, Huskinson, Lucy and Schmidt, Bettina E.) (eds.) New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos (eds.) 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kelman, Mark 2011. The Heuristics Debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krier, James E. 1997. “Capture and Counteraction: Self-Help by Environmental Zealots,” University of Richmond Law Review 30: 1039–54.Google Scholar

Krier, James E. 2009. “Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights,” Cornell Law Review, 95: 139–59.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lueck, Dean 1995. “The Rule of First Possession and the Design of the Law,” Journal of Law and Economics 38: 393–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lueck, Dean 1998. “Property and the Right to Exclude,” Nebraska Law Review 88: 730–55.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2003. “The Morality of Property,” William and Mary Law Review 48: 1849–95.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110: 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law. 7th edn. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2000. “Savigny, Holmes, and the Law and Economics of Possession,” Virginia Law Review 86: 535–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 52: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Carol M. 1986. “The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 53: 711–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serkin, Christopher 2013. “Affirmative Constitutional Commitments: The State's Obligations to Property Owners,” Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 2: 109–33.Google Scholar

Serkin, Christopher 2009. “Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations,” New York University Law Review 84: 1222–91.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2012. “Property as the Law of Things,” Harvard Law Review 125: 1691–1726.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E 2009. “Mind the Gap: The Indirect Relationship Between Ends and Means in Property Law,” Cornell Law Review 94: 959–89.Google Scholar

Smith, John Maynard 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey E. 2001. “The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession,” Georgetown Law Journal 89: 2419–74.Google Scholar

Sterk, Stewart E. 2013. “Moral Obligations of Landowners: An Examination of Doctrine,” Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal 2: 135–57.Google Scholar

Sugden, Robert 2004. The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass (ed.) 2000. Behavioral Law and Economics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayotte, Kenneth and Bolton, Patrick 2011. “Optimal Property Rights in Financial Contracting,” Review of Financial Studies 24(10): 3401–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E. (eds.) 2011. Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Jonathan M. 2009. “Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes,” Yale Law Journal 119: 384–456.Google Scholar

Barzel, Yoram 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. and Means, Gardiner C. 1991. The Modern Corporation & Private Property. Rev. edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Black, Bernard and Gervais, Simon 2010. “Incentives in the Market for Mortgage-Backed Securities,” working paper.Google Scholar

Bouckaert, Boudewijn (ed.) 2010. Property Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, James W. 2010. “Security Interests, Creditors’ Priorities, and Bankruptcy,” in Bouckaert, (ed.), pp. 270–317.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. and Yoon, Yong J. 2000. “Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons,” Journal of Law and Economics 43: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2009. “Empire Building and Fiscal Illusion? An Empirical Study of Government Official Behaviors in Takings,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6(3): 541–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2012. “Tenancy in ‘Anticommons’? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Co-Ownership,” Journal of Legal Analysis 4: 515–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien 2013. Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Yun-chien and Fennell, Lee Anne 2014. “Partition and Revelation,” University of Chicago Law Review 81: 27–51.Google Scholar

Coase, R.H. 1988. The Firm, The Market, and The Law. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cournot, Augustin 1838. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. New York: MacMillan (reprinted in 1897).Google Scholar

Dagan, Hanoch and Heller, Michael A. 2001. “The Liberal Commons,” Yale Law Journal 110: 549–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dana, David A. 2010. “The Foreclosure Crisis and the Antifragmentation Principle in State Property Law,” University of Chicago Law Review 77: 97–120.Google Scholar

Davidson, Nestor M. 2008. “Standardization and Pluralism in Property Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 61: 1597–1664.Google Scholar

Davidson, Nestor M. and Dyal-Chand, Rashmi 2010. “Property in Crisis,” Fordham Law Review 78: 1607–60.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 57: 347–59.Google Scholar

Depoorter, Ben and Parisi, Francesco 2003. “Fragmentation of Property Rights: A Functional Interpretation of the Law of Servitudes,” Global Jurist Frontiers 3(1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Depoorter, Ben and Vanneste, Sven 2006. “Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together: Experimental Evidence of Anticommons Tragedies,” Journal of Law, Economics and Policy 3: 1–23.Google Scholar

Dooley, Michael P. 1992. “Two Models of Corporate Governance,” Business Lawyer 47: 461–527.Google Scholar

Dorfman, Avihay 2011. “Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus,” University of Toronto Law Journal 61: 467–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubord, David R. 1980. “Time-Share Condominiums: Property's Fourth Dimension,” Maine Law Review 32: 181–236.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1973. “Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls,” University of Chicago Law Review 40: 681–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C 1993. “Property in Land,” Yale Law Journal 102: 1315–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C 2010. The Household: Informal Order Around the Hearth. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C 2011. “Two Cheers for the Bundle of Sticks Metaphor, Three Cheers for Merrill and Smith,” Econ Journal Watch 8: 215–22.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1982. “Notice and Freedom of Contract in the Law of Servitudes,” Southern California Law Review 66: 1353–68.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A 2011. “Heller's Gridlock Economy in Perspective: Why There is Too Little, Not Too Much Private Property,” Arizona Law Review 53: 51–82.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2006. “Efficient Trespass: The Case for ‘Bad Faith’ Adverse Possession,” Northwestern University Law Review 100: 1037–96.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2008. “Homeownership 2.0,” Northwestern University Law Review 102: 1047–1118.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2009. The Unbounded Home: Property Values Beyond Property Lines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2011. “Commons, Anticommons, Semicommons,” in Ayotte, and Smith, (eds.), pp. 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2012. “Lumpy Property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160: 1955–1993.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne 2013. “The Problem of Resource Access,” Harvard Law Review 126: 1471–1531.Google Scholar

Garnett, Nicole Stelle 2001. “On Castles and Commerce: Zoning Law and the Home-Business Dilemma,” William & Mary Law Review 42: 1191–1244.Google Scholar

Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier 2000. “The Essential Role of Organizational Law,” Yale Law Journal 110: 387–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry and Kraakman, Reinier 2002. “Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31: S373–S420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, Henry and Mattei, Ugo 1998. “The Functions of Trust Law: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis,” New York University Law Review 73: 434–79.Google Scholar

Heller, Michael A. 1998. “The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in Transition from Marx to Markets,” Harvard Law Review 111: 621–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, Michael A. 1999. “The Boundaries of Private Property,” Yale Law Journal 108: 1163–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, Michael A. 2008. The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation and Costs Lives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Heller, Michael A. 2011. “The Anticommons Lexicon,” in Ayotte, and Smith, (eds.), pp. 57–74.Google Scholar

Heller, Michael A. and Eisenberg, Rebecca S. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,” Science 280: 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, William H. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, Kathryn 2012. “Fragmentation Nodes: A Study in Financial Innovation, Complexity, and Systemic Risk,” Stanford Law Review 64: 657–725.Google Scholar

Kelly, Daniel B. 2006. “The ‘Public Use’ Requirement in Eminent Domain Law: A Rationale Based on Secret Purchases and Private Influence,” Cornell Law Review 92: 1–65.Google Scholar

Kelly, Daniel B. 2011. “Acquiring Land Through Eminent Domain: Justifications, Limitations, and Alternatives,” in Ayotte, and Smith, (eds.), pp. 344–71.Google Scholar

Kelly, Daniel B. 2014. “The Right to Include,” Emory Law Journal 63: 857–924.Google Scholar

Kieff, F. Scott and Paredes, Troy A. 2007. “Engineering a Deal: Toward a Private Ordering Solution to the Anticommons Problem,” Boston College Law Review 48: 111–48.Google Scholar

Lametti, David 2013. “The Concept of the Anticommons: Useful, or Ubiquitous and Unnecessary?” in Howe, Helena R. and Griffiths, Jonathan (eds.), Concepts of Property in Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge University Press, pp. 232–57.Google Scholar

Levinson, Daryl 2000. “Making Government Pay: Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs,” University of Chicago Law Review 67: 345–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewinsohn-Zamir, Daphna 2003. “The Objectivity of Well-Being and the Objectives of Property Law,” New York University Law Review 78: 1669–1754.Google Scholar

Libecap, Gary D. 1989. Contracting for Property Rights. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lueck, Dean and Miceli, Thomas J. 2007. “Property: Leases,” in Polinsky, A. Mitchell and Shavell, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 217–23.Google Scholar

Manne, Henry G. 1967. “Our Two Corporation Systems: Law and Economics,” Virginia Law Review 53: 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McChesney, Fred S. 2006. “Coase, Demsetz, and the Unending Externality Debate,” Cato Journal 26: 179–200.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. 1986. “The Economics of Public Use,” Cornell Law Review 72: 61–116.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” Yale Law Journal 110: 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2001. “The Property/Contract Interface,” Columbia Law Review 101: 773–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Thomas W. and Smith, Henry E. 2012. Property: Principles and Policies. 2nd edn. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar

Merryman, John Henry 1963. “Policy, Autonomy, and the Numerus Clausus in Italian and American Property Law,” American Journal of Comparative Law 12: 224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulligan, Christina 2013. “A Numerus Clausus Principle for Intellectual Property,” Tennessee Law Review 80: 235–90.Google Scholar

Murray Fiona, and Stern, Scott 2007. “Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-commons Hypothesis,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63: 648–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, Jonathan Remy and Stern, Stephanie M. 2010. “Property Frames,” Washington University Law Review 87: 449–503.Google Scholar

Note 2012. “The Perils of Fragmentation and Reckless Innovation,” Harvard Law Review 125: 1799–1821.Google Scholar

Parisi, Francesco 2002. “Entropy in Property,” American Journal of Comparative Law 50: 595–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parisi, Francesco 2003. “Freedom of Contract and the Laws of Entropy,” Supreme Court Economic Review 10: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pienaar, G.J. 2010. Sectional Titles and Other Fragmented Property Schemes. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar

Peirce, Ellen R. and Mann, Richard A. 1983. “Time-Share Interests in Real Estate: A Critical Evaluation of the Regulatory Environment,” Notre Dame Law Review 59: 9–60.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2006. “Common-Law Economic Torts: An Economic and Legal Analysis,” Arizona Law Review 48: 735–47.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 2011. Economic Analysis of Law. 8th edn. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Radin, Margaret Jane 1982. “Property and Personhood,” Stanford Law Review 34: 957–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudden, Bernard 1987. “Economic Theory v. Property Law: The Numerus Clausus Problem,” in Eekelaar, John and Bell, John (eds.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 239–363.Google Scholar

Schulz, Norbert, Parisi, Francesco, and Depoorter, Ben 2003. “Fragmentation in Property: Towards a General Model,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 158: 594–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarcz, Steven L. 2012. “Structuring Responsibility in Securitization Transactions,” Capital University Law Review 40: 803–19.Google Scholar

Scott, Austin Wakeman, Fratcher, William Franklin, and Ascher, Mark L. 2006. Scott and Ascher on Trusts. 5th edn. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar

Shavell, Steven 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sitkoff, Robert H. 2004. “An Agency Costs Theory of Trust Law,” Cornell Law Review 89: 621–84.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2004. “Property and Property Rules,” New York University Law Review 79: 1719–98.Google Scholar

Smith, Henry E. 2011. “Standardization in Property Law,” in Ayotte, and Smith, (eds.), pp. 148–73.Google Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey E. 1988. “Toward an Economic Understanding of Touch and Concern,” Duke Law Journal 1988: 925–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey E. 1990. “Darwin, Donations, and the Illusion of Dead Hand Control,” Tulane Law Review 64: 705–81.Google Scholar

Stake, Jeffrey E. 2010. “Decomposition of Property Rights,” in Bouckaert, (ed.), pp. 126–60.Google Scholar

Sterk, Stewart E. 1988. “Foresight and the Law of Servitudes,” Cornell Law Review 73: 956–70.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Alemán, Mateo 1604. Segunda parte de la vida de Guzmán de Alfarache, atalaya de la vida humana. Lisbon: Pedro Craasbeck.Google Scholar

Anderson, Terry L., and Hill, Peter J. 2002. “Cowboys and Contracts,” Journal of Legal Studies 31:S489–S514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Terry L., and Hill, Peter J. 2004. The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arruñada, Benito 2003a. “Property Enforcement as Organized Consent,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19:401–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arruñada, Benito 2003b. “Vías de acceso al Registro de la Propiedad: La experiencia española.” Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario 79:3271–89.Google Scholar

Arruñada, Benito 2012. Institutional foundations of impersonal exchange: Theory and policy of contractual registries. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arruñada, Benito Forthcoming. “The Institutions of Roman Markets.” In Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, (ed.), Roman Law and Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baird, Douglas G., and Jackson, Thomas H. 1983. “Possession and Ownership: An Examination of the Scope of Article 9,” Stanford Law Review 35:175–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar