Book contents
- The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders
- The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Introduction and concepts
- Section 2 The self in treatment frameworks
- 4 Working with the future: a psychodynamic–integrative approach to treatment
- 5 Finding the self in a cognitive behavioral perspective
- 6 The self in acceptance and commitment therapy
- 7 The self in schema therapy
- Section 3 The self in specific psychological disorders
- Section 4 Conclusions and future directions
- Index
- References
6 - The self in acceptance and commitment therapy
from Section 2 - The self in treatment frameworks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Edited by
Maja Nedeljkovic and
Foreword by
Book contents
- The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders
- The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Introduction and concepts
- Section 2 The self in treatment frameworks
- 4 Working with the future: a psychodynamic–integrative approach to treatment
- 5 Finding the self in a cognitive behavioral perspective
- 6 The self in acceptance and commitment therapy
- 7 The self in schema therapy
- Section 3 The self in specific psychological disorders
- Section 4 Conclusions and future directions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., et al. (2001). Psychological development. In Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition (pp. 157–180). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Biglan, A., & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Should the behavioral sciences become more pragmatic? The case for functional contextualism in research on human behavior. Applied and Preventive Psychology: Current Scientific Perspectives, 5, 45–57.Google Scholar
Carrasquillo, N., & Zettle, R. D. (2014). Comparing a brief self-as-context exercise to control-based and attention placebo protocols for coping with induced pain. The Psychological Record, 64, 659–669.Google Scholar
Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Luciano, C. (2013). An empirical investigation of hierarchical versus distinction relations in a self-based ACT exercise. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 13, 373–388.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and varieties of scientific contextualism. In Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., Reese, H. W., & Sarbin, T. R. (Eds.), Varieties of Scientific Contextualism (pp. 11–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S. C., & Gregg, J. (2000). Functional contextualism and the self. In Muran, C. (Ed.), Self-Relations in the Psychotherapy Process (pp. 291–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behavior Change. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J., Lipworth, L., & Burney, R. (1985). The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 8, 163–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lattal, K. A. (2012). Self in behavior analysis. In McHugh, L. & Stewart, I. (Eds.), The Self and Perspective Taking: Contributions and Applications from Modern Behavioral Science (pp. 37–52). Oakland, CA: Context Press.Google Scholar
Levin, M. E., Hildebrandt, M. J., Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: A meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies. Behavior Therapy, 43, 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lovaas, I., Newsome, C., & Hickman, C. (1987). Self-stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 45–68.Google Scholar
Luciano, C., Ruiz, F. J., Vizcaino Torres, R. M., et al. (2011). A relational frame analysis of defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy: A preliminary and quasi-experimental study with at-risk adolescents. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 165–182.Google Scholar
Malott, R. W., Whaley, D. L., & Malott, M. E. (1991). Elementary Principles of Behavior (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Masuda, A., Feinstein, A. B., Wendell, J. W., & Sheehan, S. T. (2010). Cognitive defusion versus thought distraction: A clinical rationale, training, and experiential exercise in altering psychological impacts of negative self-referential thoughts. Behavior Modification, 34, 520–538.Google Scholar
Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Sackett, C. F., & Twohig, M. P. (2004). Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Twohig, M. P., et al. (2009). A parametric study of cognitive defusion and the believability and discomfort of negative self-relevant thoughts. Behavior Modification, 33, 250–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masuda, A., Twohig, M. P., Stormo, A. R., et al. (2010). The effects of cognitive defusion and thought distraction on emotional discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 11–17.Google Scholar
McHugh, L., & Stewart, I. (2012). The Self and Perspective Taking: Contributions and Applications from Modern Behavioral Science. Oakland, CA: Context Press.Google Scholar
Orsillo, S. M., & Batten, S. J. (2005). Acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Modification, 29, 95–129.Google Scholar
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reese, H. W. (1968). The Perception of Stimulus Relations: Discrimination Learning and Transposition. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1988). Behaviorism at fifty. In Catania, A. C. & Harnad, S. (Eds.), The Selection of Behavior (pp. 278–292). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1964.)Google Scholar
Society of Clinical Psychology. (n.d.). Psychological treatments. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicaltreatments.orgGoogle Scholar
Strosahl, K. D., Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., & Gifford, E. V. (2004). An ACT primer: Core therapy processes, intervention strategies, and therapist competencies. In Hayes, S. C. & Strosahl, K. D. (Eds.), A Practical Guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (pp. 31–58). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Strosahl, K. D., & Robinson, P. J. (2008). The Mindfulness and Acceptance Workbook for Depression. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
Torneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT: An Introduction to Relational Frame Theory and its Clinical Application. Oakland, CA: Context Press.Google Scholar
Vilardaga, R., Hayes, S. C., Levin, M., & Muto, T. (2009). Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 105–133.Google Scholar
Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Williams, L. M. (2007). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An example of a third-wave therapy for treatment of Australian Vietnam War veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Charles Sturt University; Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. G., Bordieri, M., & Whiteman, K. (2012). The self and mindfulness. In McHugh, L. & Stewart, I. (Eds.), The Self and Perspective Taking: Contributions and Applications from Modern Behavioral Science (pp. 181–197). Oakland, CA: Context Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. G., & DuFrene, T. (2008). Mindfulness for Two: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Approach to Mindfulness in Psychotherapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
Wray, A. M., Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., & Guinther, P. M. (2012). Examining the reinforcing properties of making sense: A preliminary investigation. The Psychological Record, 62, 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zettle, R. D. (2007). ACT for Depression: A Clinician’s Guide to Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Treating Depression. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by