Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Section 6 - Trauma to Compromised Spine
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2018
Book contents
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 Normal Variants and Mimickers
- Section 2 Recommendations, Pitfalls, and Controversies
- Section 3 Trauma to Uncompromised Spine
- Section 4 Thoracolumbar Trauma Classification
- Section 5 Specifics of Pediatric Spinal Trauma
- Section 6 Trauma to Compromised Spine
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Imaging of Spinal TraumaA Case-Based Approach, pp. 117 - 129Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Cho, WI, Chang, UK. Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:177–183.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, M, Fuwa, S, Numaguchi, Y, Kobayashi, N, Saida, Y. Pedicle involvement on MR imaging is common in osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:668–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thawait, SK, Marcus, MA, Morrison, WB, Klufas, RA, Eng, J, Carrino, JA. Research synthesis: what is the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E736–E744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thawait, SK, Kim, J, Klufas, RA, Morrison, WB, Flanders, AE, Carrino, JA, Ohno-Machado, L. Comparison of four prediction models to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures according to MRI feature analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:493–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdel-Wanis, ME, Solyman, MT, Hasan, NM. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating vertebral compression fractures caused by malignancy, osteoporosis, and infections. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011;19:145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Klazen, CA, Lohle, PN, de Vries, J, Jansen, FH, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2010;376:1085–1092.Google Scholar
Brinckman, MA, Chau, C, Ross, JS. Marrow edema variability in acute spine fractures. Spine J 2015;15:454–460. doi: 10.1016/jspinee.2014.09.032.Google Scholar
Gerdhem, P. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures: vertebral fractures. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013;27:743–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKiernan, F, Faciszewski, T. Intravertebral clefts in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1414–1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanchiku, T, Taguchi, T, Kawai, S. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and new classification of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:463–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Lyders, EM, Whitlow, CT, Baker, MD, Morris, PP. Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:201–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longhino, V, Bonora, C, Sansone, V. The management of sacral stress fractures: current concepts. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2011;8:19–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Kortman, K, Ortiz, O, Miller, T, et al. Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:461–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deschamps Perdomo, A, Tomé-Bermejo, F, Piñera, AR, Alvarez, L. Misdiagnosis of sacral stress fracture: an underestimated cause of low back pain in pregnancy? Am J Case Rep 2015;16:60–64.Google ScholarPubMed
References
Westerveld, LA, Verlaan, JJ, Oner, FC. Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders: a systematic review of the literature on treatment, neurological status and complications. Eur Spine J 2009;18:145–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caron, T, Bransford, R, Nguyen, Q, et al. Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. Spine 2010;35:E458–E464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moussallem, CD, McCutheon, BA, Clarke, MJ, et al. Perioperative complications in open versus percutaneous treatment of spinal fractures in patients with ankylosed spine. J Clin Neurosci 2016;30:88–92.Google Scholar
Lu, ML, Tsai, TT, Lai, PL, et al. A retrospective study of treating thoracolumbar spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24 Suppl 1:S117–S123. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1375-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed