Book contents
- Proactive Support of LaborThe Challenge of Normal ChildbirthSecond edition
- Proactive Support of Labor
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword to the first edition
- Preface
- Web-links
- Chapter 1 General introduction
- Section 1 A wake-up call
- Section 2 Back to basics
- Chapter 7 Forgotten lessons from nature
- Chapter 8 Elementary biophysics of birth
- Chapter 9 Definitions and verbal precision
- Chapter 10 First-stage labor revisited
- Chapter 11 Second-stage labor redefined
- Section 3 Proactive support of labor
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - Forgotten lessons from nature
from Section 2 - Back to basics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Proactive Support of LaborThe Challenge of Normal ChildbirthSecond edition
- Proactive Support of Labor
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword to the first edition
- Preface
- Web-links
- Chapter 1 General introduction
- Section 1 A wake-up call
- Section 2 Back to basics
- Chapter 7 Forgotten lessons from nature
- Chapter 8 Elementary biophysics of birth
- Chapter 9 Definitions and verbal precision
- Chapter 10 First-stage labor revisited
- Chapter 11 Second-stage labor redefined
- Section 3 Proactive support of labor
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proactive Support of LaborThe Challenge of Normal Childbirth, pp. 49 - 52Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Naaktgeboren, C. The biology of childbirth. In Chalmers, I, Keirse, MJNC, Enkin, M, eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 2: Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998Google Scholar
Parkes, AS. Marshall’s Physiology of Reproduction 4th edn, Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green; 1958:504–5Google Scholar
Young, IR. The comparative physiology of parturition in mammals. Front Horm Res 2001;27:10–30Google Scholar
Fortman, JD, Hewett, TA, Bennet, BT. The Laboratory Non-Human Primates. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000Google Scholar
Jensen, P. The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text. New York: CABI Publishing; 2002Google Scholar
Nagel, C, Erber, R, Bergmaier, C, et al. Cortisol and progestin release, heart rate and heart rate variability in the pregnant and postpartum mare, fetus and newborn foal. Theriogenology 2012;78:759–67Google Scholar
Belsey, EM, Rosenblatt, DB, Lieberman, BA, et al. The influence of maternal analgesia on neonatal behaviour: I. Pethidine. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981;88:398–406Google Scholar
Kron, RE, Stein, M, Goddard, KE. Newborn sucking behavior affected by obstetric sedation. Pediatrics 1966;37:1012–16Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, R, Bhatt, M, Wang, CN. Double-blind comparison of the neurobehaviour of neonates following the administration of different doses of meperidine to the mother. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978;25:405–11Google Scholar
Righard, L, Alade, MO. Effect of delivery room routines on success of first breast-feed. Lancet 1990;336:1105–7Google Scholar
Nissen, E, Lilja, G, Matthiesen, AS, et al. Effects of maternal pethidine on infants’ developing breastfeeding behaviour. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:140–5Google Scholar
Matthews, MK. The relationship between maternal labour analgesia and delay in the initiation of breastfeeding in healthy neonates in the early neonatal period. Midwifery 1989;5:3–10Google Scholar
Crowell, MK, Hill, PD, Humenick, SS. Relationship between obstetric analgesia and time of effective breastfeeding. J Nurse Midwifery 1994;39:150–6Google Scholar
Nagel, C, Erber, R, Ille, N, et al. Parturition in horses is dominated by parasympathetic activity of the autonomous nervous system. Theriogenology 2014;82:160–8Google Scholar
Friedman, DD. Conflict behavior in the parturient. In Hirsh, H, ed. The Family. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. Basel: Karger; 1975:373–6Google Scholar
Newton, N, Foshee, D, Newton, M. Experimental inhibition of labor through environmental disturbance. Obstet Gynecol 1966;27:371–7Google Scholar
Rosenberg, K, Trevathan, W. Birth, obstetrics and human evolution. Br J Obstet Gynaec 2002;109:1199–206Google Scholar
Lopez, Bernal A. Overview of current research in parturition (Uterine Contractility Symposium of the Physiological Society). Exp Physiol 2001;86:213–22Google Scholar
Nathanielsz, PW. Comparative studies on the initiation of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;78:127–32Google Scholar
Lawrence, AB, Petherick, JC, McLean, K, et al. Naloxone prevents interruption of parturition and increases plasma oxytocin following environmental disturbance in parturient sows. Physiol Behav 1992;52:917–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijnen, HA, Denollet, J, Essed, GG, et al. High maternal anxiety during late gestation predicts protraction of labor. In Wijnen, HA, ed. The Kempen Study. Academic Thesis 2005, University of Tilburg, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar