Aitken, RJ, Clarkson, JS (1988) Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. Journal of Andrology, 9: 367–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Almeida, PA, Bolton, VN (1995) The effect of temperature fluctuations on the cytoskeletal organisation and chromosomal constitution of the human oocyte. Zygote, 3: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alper, MM (2013) Experience with ISO quality control in assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility 100:1503–1508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alper, MM, Brinsden, PR, Fischer, R, Wikland, M (2002) Is your IVF programme good?Human Reproduction, 17: 8–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology (2011a) The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22:632–646 (simultaneous publication).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology (2011b) The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Human Reproduction 26:1270–1283 (simultaneous publication).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine (2012) The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators (KPIs) and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting directed by Alpha. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 25:146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asuero, AM, Queraltó, JM, Pujol-Ribera, Eet al. (2014) Effectiveness of a mindfulness education program in primary health care professionals: a pragmatic controlled trial. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 34: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barratt, CL, Björndahl, L, Menkveld, R, Mortimer, D (2011) ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance. Human Reproduction, 26: 3207–3212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bavister, BD (1995) Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Human Reproduction Update, 1: 91–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bavister, BD (1999) Stage-specific culture media and reactions of embryos to them. In: Jansen, R, Mortimer, D (eds), Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, Lancashire, UK, pp. 367–377.Google Scholar

Benson, JD, Chicone, CC, Critser, JK (2012) Analytical optimal controls for the state constrained addition and removal of cryoprotective agents. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 74: 1516–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Björndahl, L (2011) What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen analysis results. Human Fertility, 14: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Björndahl, L, Barratt, CLR, Fraser, LR, Kvist, U, Mortimer, D (2002) ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995–1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training. Human Reproduction, 17: 1299–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Björndahl, L, Mortimer, D, Barratt, CLR, et al. (2010) A Practical Guide to Basic Laboratory Andrology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, DA, Forsberg, AS, Hillensjö, T, Wikland, M (1999) The practicalities of sequential blastocyst culture. Presented at ART, Science and Fiction, the Second International Alpha Congress, Copenhagen (Denmark), September 1999. debbie.blake@aut.ac.nzCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogner, MS (ed.) (1994) Human Error In Medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.Google Scholar

Brison, DR, Hooper, M, Critchlow, JDet al. (2004) Reducing risk in the IVF laboratory: implementation of a double witnessing system. AVMA Medical and Legal Journal, 10: 176–180.Google Scholar

Calman, KC (1996) Cancer: science and society and the communication of risk. British Medical Journal, 313: 799–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Calman, KC, Royston, GHD (1997) Personal paper: risk language and dialects. British Medical Journal, 315: 939–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canadian Standards Association (2012) Z900.2.1–12: Tissues for Assisted Reproduction. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Catt, JW, Henman, M (2000) Toxic effects of oxygen on human embryo development. Human Reproduction, 15, Suppl.2: 199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chian, R-C, Quinn, P (2010) Fertility Cryopreservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J (2013) On patenting time and other natural phenomena. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 26: 109–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J, Gilligan, A, Esposito, W, Schimmel, T, Dale, B (1997) Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Human Reproduction, 12: 1742–1749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, J, Medley, G (2005) Stop Working and Start Thinking: A Guide to Becoming a Scientist, second edition. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK, 150pp.Google Scholar

Cook, RR (1999) Assessment of Uncertainties in Measurement for Calibration and Testing Laboratories. National Association of Testing Authorities, Sydney, Australia. 57pp.Google Scholar

Cook IVF (1999) Cook Culture Systems: Instructions for Use. Cook IVF, Eight Mile Plains, Qld, Australia.Google Scholar

Cooke, S, Tyler, JP, Driscoll, G (2002) Objective assessments of temperature maintenance using in vitro culture techniques. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics,19: 368–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coombs, A (2001) The Living Workplace: Soul, Spirit and Success in the 21st Century. HarperCollins Publishers Ltd, Toronto, Canada, 188pp.Google Scholar

Cooper, TG, Noonan, E, von Eckardstein, Set al. (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reproduction Update, 16: 231–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cullinan, RT, Catt, JW, Fussell, S, Henman, M, Mortimer, D (1998) Improved implantation rates of cryopreserved human embryos thawed in a phosphate-free medium. 14^th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Göteborg (Sweden), June 1998. Abstract O-117. Human Reproduction, 13 (Abstract Book 1): 59–60.Google Scholar

Dale, B, McQuater, R (1998) Managing Business Improvement and Quality: Implementing Key Tools and Techniques. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar

Damelio, R (1996) The Basics of Process Mapping. Productivity Inc, Portland, OR, USA.Google Scholar

de los Santos, MZJ, Ruiz, A (2013) Protocols for tracking and witnessing samples and patients in assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility 100:1499–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeMarco, T (2001) Slack: Getting Past Burnout, Busywork, and the Myth of Total Efficiency. Broadway Books, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Deming, WE. Out of the Crisis. MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982, 1986.Google Scholar

de Ziegler, D, Gambone, JC, Meldrum, DR, Chapron, C (2013) Risk and safety management in infertility and assisted reproductive technology (ART): from the doctor's office to the ART procedure. Fertility and Sterility, 100:1509–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, R, Steptoe, P (1980) A Matter of Life. Hutchinson & Co, London, UK.Google Scholar

Elder, K, Elliott, T (1998) Problem Solving and Troubleshooting in IVF. Ladybrook Publishing, Perth, WA, Australia.Google Scholar

Ford, WCL, Rees, JM (1990) The bioenergetics of mammalian sperm motility. In: Gagnon, C (ed), Controls of Sperm Motility: Biological and Clinical Aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 175–202.Google Scholar

Fraser, LR, Quinn, PJ (1981) A glycolytic product is obligatory for initiation of the sperm acrosome reaction and whiplash motility required for fertilization in the mouse. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 61: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

George, ML, Rowlands, D, Proce, M, Maxey, J (2005) The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook. Mcraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Gonen, Y, Dirnfeld, M, Goldman, S, Koifman, M, Abramovici, H (1991) Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization?Human Reproduction, 6:1092–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graban, M, Swartz, JE (2014) The Executive Guide to Healthcare Kaizen: Leadership for a Continuously Learning and Improving Organization. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar

Grout, JR (2004) Process mapping. URL: http://campbell.berry.edu/faculty/jgrout/processmapping/Google Scholar

Harbottle, S (2003) Are You Working Too Hard? Annual Meeting of the Association of Clinical Embryologists, Glasgow (UK).Google Scholar

Heller, R, Hindle, T (2003) Essential Manager's Manual. DK Publishing, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Hobbs, P (2009) Project Management. DK Publishing, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Hutchison, D (1994) Total Quality Management in the Clinical Laboratory. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI, USA.Google Scholar

IEEE Standards Association (1998) IEEE Standard for Function Modeling Language – Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0. IEEE 1320.1–1998 (Replaces FIPS PUB 183). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association, Piscataway, NJ, USA. URL: http://standards.ieee.org/.Google Scholar

ISO (1993) ISO/TS 14253-2:1999 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment – Part 2: Guide to the estimation of uncertainty in GPS measurement, in calibration of measuring equipment and in product verification. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

ISO (2008) International standard ISO 9001:2008. Quality Management Systems – Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

ISO (2011) International Standard ISO 19011:2011. Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

ISO (2012) International Standard ISO 15189:2012. Medical Laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Jacka, JM, Keller, P (2001) Business Process Mapping: Improving Customer Satisfaction. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Kaser, DJ, Racowsky, C (2014) Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 20: 617–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kennedy, CR (2004) Risk management in assisted reproduction. AVMA Medical and Legal Journal, 10: 169–175.Google Scholar

Krafcik, JF (1988) Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review 30: 41–52.Google Scholar

Lane, M, Lyons, MA, Bavister, BD (2000) Cryopreservation reduces the ability of hamster 2-cell embryos to regulate intracellular pH. Human Reproduction, 15: 389–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leape, LL (1997) A systems analysis approach to medical error. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 3: 213–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leese, HJ (1990) The environment of the preimplantation embryo. In: Edwards, RG (ed), Establishing a Successful Human Pregnancy, Serono Symposia Publications Volume 66, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 143–154.Google Scholar

Marconi, G, Vilela, M, Bello, J, Diradourian, M, Quintana, R, Sueldo, C (2003) Endometrial lesions caused by catheters used for embryo transfers: a preliminary report. Fertility and Sterility, 80: 363–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayer, JF, Jones, EL, Dowling-Lacey, Det al. (2003) Total quality improvement in the IVF laboratory: choosing indicators of quality. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 7: 695–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayer, JF, Nehchiri, F, Weedon, VMet al. (1999) Prospective randomized crossover analysis of the impact of an IVF incubator air filtration system (Coda, GenX) on clinical pregnancy rates. Fertility and Sterility, Suppl.1: S42–S43.Google Scholar

McDonald, JA, Norman, RJ (2002) A randomized controlled trial of a soft double lumen embryo transfer catheter versus a firm single lumen catheter: significant improvements in pregnancy rates. Human Reproduction, 17:1502–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meldrum, DR, de Ziegler, D (2013) Introduction: Risk and safety management in infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 100 :1497–1498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Menezo, Y (1976) Milieu synthétique pour la survie et la maturation des gamètes et pour la culture de l'oeuf fécondé. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, Série D, 282:1967–1970.Google Scholar

Meriano, J, Weissman, A, Greenblatt, EM, Ward, S, Casper, RF (2000) The choice of embryo transfer catheter affects embryo implantation after IVF. Fertility and Sterility, 74:678–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meseguer, M, Rubio, I, Cruz, Met al. (2012) Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertility and Sterility, 98: 1481–1489, e10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortimer, D (1986) Elaboration of a new culture medium for physiological studies on human sperm motility and capacitation. Human Reproduction, 1: 247–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D (1991) Sperm preparation techniques and iatrogenic failures of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 6: 173–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D (1994) Practical Laboratory Andrology. Oxford University Press, New Tork, NY, USA, 393pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortimer, D (1999) Quality management in the IVF laboratory. In: Jansen, R, Mortimer, D (eds), Towards Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth, UK, pp. 421–426.Google Scholar

Mortimer, D (2000) Sperm preparation methods. Journal of Andrology, 21: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D (2004a) Current and future concepts and practices in human sperm cryobanking. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 9: 134–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D (2004b) Setting up risk management systems in IVF laboratories. Clinical Risk, 10: 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortimer, ST (2002) Practical application of computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA). In: van der Horst, G, Franken, D, Bornman, R, de Jager, T, Dyer, S (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spermatology, (Cape Town, South Africa). Monduzzi Editore S.p.A., Bologna, Italy, pp.233–238.Google Scholar

Mortimer, D, Barratt, CLR (2006) Is there a real risk of transmitting variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by donor sperm insemination?Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 13: 778–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mortimer, D, Demetriou, A, Cullinan, R, Henman, M, Jansen, RPS (1995) A novel approach to IVF laboratory quality control. IXth World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, Vienna (Austria), April 1995, Abstract OC-160. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 12 (3) Suppl: 66S.Google Scholar

Mortimer, D, Di Berardino, T (2008) To alarm or monitor? A cost-benefit analysis comparing laboratory dial-out alarms and a real-time monitoring system. Alpha Newsletter, No 39 (7 pages).Google Scholar

Mortimer, D, Henman, MJ, Jansen, RPS (2002a) Development of an Improved Embryo Culture System for Clinical Human IVF. William A. Cook Australia, Eight Mile Plains, Qld, Australia.Google Scholar

Mortimer, D, Mortimer, ST (1992) Methods of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction. Annals of the Academy of Medicine of Singapore, 21: 517–524.Google ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D, Poole, T, Cohen, J (2014) Introduction to Quality Management in Assisted Reproductive Technology Symposium. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 28:533–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D, Shu, MA, Tan, R (1986) Standardization and quality control of sperm concentration and sperm motility counts in semen analysis. Human Reproduction, 1: 299–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, D, Shu, MA, Tan, R, Mortimer, ST (1989) A technical note on diluting semen for the haemocytometric determination of sperm concentration. Human Reproduction, 4: 166–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mortimer, S, Fluker, M, Yuzpe, A (2001a) Keeping the lab in control: use of laboratory performance measures. 47^th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, Whistler (BC, Canada), Abstract FP3.Google Scholar

Mortimer, S, Fluker, M, Yuzpe, A (2001b) Effect of culture conditions on embryo cleavage rates and morphology. 47^th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, Whistler (BC, Canada), Abstract FP1.Google Scholar

Mortimer, ST, Fluker, MR, Yuzpe, AA (2002b) Relative effects of culture conditions on fertilization rate and embryo quality. 48^th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, Manoir Richelieu (Quebec, Canada), Abstract FP23.Google Scholar

Mortimer, ST, Fluker, MR, Yuzpe, AA (2002c) Effect of embryo transfer catheter on implantation rates. Fertility and Sterility, 76(3S):S17–S18, Abstract O-045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munné, S, Magli, C, Adler, Aet al. (1997) Treatment-related chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Human Reproduction, 12: 780–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murray, CT, Mortimer, D (1999) Monitoring laboratory performance measures for quality assurance in IVF. 11th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization and Human Reproductive Genetics, Sydney, Australia. Abstract O-058, p90.Google Scholar

National Institute of Standards and Technology (1993) Integration definition for function modelling (IDEF-0). Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183. Available from URL: http://www.idef.com/.Google Scholar

NCCLS (2002) Clinical Laboratory Technical Procedure Manuals; Approved Guideline – Fourth Edition, document GP2-A4. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA. URL: www.nccls.orgGoogle Scholar

Pickering, SJ, Braude, PR, Johnson, MH, Cant, A, Currie, J (1990) Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertility and Sterility, 54: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Porath, C, Pearson, C (2009) How toxic colleagues corrode performance. Harvard Business Review, April: 24.Google Scholar

Quinn, P (1995) Enhanced results in mouse and human embryo culture using a modified human tubal fluid medium lacking glucose and phosphate ions. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 12: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, P (ed) (2014) Culture Media, Solutions, and Systems in Human ART. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, P, Kerin, JF, Warnes, GM (1985) Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertility and Sterility, 44:493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reason, JT (1994) Foreword. In: Bogner, MS (ed), Human Error in Medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.Google Scholar

Regehr, C, Glancy, D, Pitts, A, Leblanc, VR (2014) Interventions to reduce the consequences of stress in physicians: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202:353–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sánchez-Pozo, MC, Mendiola, J, Serrano, Met al.; Special Interest Group in Andrology of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (2013) Proposal of guidelines for the appraisal of SEMen QUAlity studies (SEMQUA). Human Reproduction, 28: 10–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scott, RT, De Ziegler, N (2013) Could safety boards provide a valuable tool to enhance the safety of reproductive medicine?Fertility and Sterility 100:1518–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sharpe, VA, Faden, AI (1998) Medical Harm: Historical, Conceptual, and Ethical Dimensions of Iatrogenic Illness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shewhart, WA (1986) Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. Dover Publications Inc, Mineola, NY, USA. (A reprint of the original edition published by the Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 1939.)Google Scholar

Sinek, S (2009) Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. Portfolio, a member of the Penguin Group (USA) Inc., NY, USA.Google Scholar

Sinek, S (2014) Leaders Eat Last: Why Some Teams Pull Together and Others Don't. Penguin Group (USA) LLC, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Singleton, O, Hölzel, BK, Vangel, Met al. (2014) Change in brainstem grey matter concentration following a mindfulness-based intervention is correlated with improvement in psychological well-being. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slovic, P, Finucane, ML, Peters, E, MacGregor, DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stoop, D, De Munck, N, Jansen, Eet al. (2012) Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 24: 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swain, J (2014) Decisions for the IVF laboratory: comparative analysis of embryo culture incubators. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 28:535–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tedder, RS, Zuckerman, MA, Goldstone, AHet al. (1995) Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet 346, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tervit, HR, Whittingham, DG, Rowson, LEA (1972) Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 30: 493–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Testart, J, Lassalle, B, Frydman, R (1982) Apparatus for the in vitro fertilization and culture of human oocytes. Fertility and Sterility, 38: 372–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thornhill, AR, Orriols Brunetti, X, Bird, S (2013) Measuring human error in the IVF laboratory using an electronic witnessing system. Proceedings of the 17th World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Lisbon, Portugal, 2013. Monduzzi Editoriali, Bologna, pp101–106.Google Scholar

Toft, B, Mascie-Taylor, H (2005) Involuntary automaticity: a work-system induced risk to sage health care. Health Services Management Research, 18: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Landuyt, L, Stoop, D, Verheyen, Get al. (2011) Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy. Human Reproduction, 26: 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Weering, HGI, Schats, R, McDonnell, Jet al. (2002) The impact of the embryo transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in IVF. Human Reproduction,17:666–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, WH, Meng, L, Hackett, RJ, Odenbourg, R, Keefe, DL (2001) Limited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling-rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy. Human Reproduction, 16: 2374–2378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wikland, M, Sjoblom, C (2000) The application of quality systems in ART programs. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 166: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, K. 10 Ways to Kill Your Strategic Plan. See http://blog.smartdraw.com/10-ways-kill-strategic-plan/ (accessed 06/02/2014).Google Scholar

Wisanto, A, Camus, M, Janssens, Ret al. (1989) Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program. Fertility and Sterility, 52:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Health Organization (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, fourth edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2010) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, fifth edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar