Aarts, B. 2000. ‘Corpus linguistics, Chomsky and fuzzy tree fragments’, in Mair, and Hundt, (eds.), pp. 5–13.Google Scholar

Aarts, J. and Granger, S. 1998. ‘Tag sequences in learner corpora: A key to interlanguage grammar and discourse’, in Granger, (ed.), pp. 132–41.Google Scholar

Aarts, J., van Halteren, H. and Oostdijk, N. 1998. ‘The linguistic annotation of corpora: The TOSCA analysis system’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3(2): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. 2008. ‘The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(4): 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. 2009. ‘Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny’, Language Learning 59(2): 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abuhakema, G., Faraj, R., Feldman, A. and Fitzpatrick, E. 2008. ‘Annotating an Arabic learner corpus for error’, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on LREC (Language Resources and Evaluation), pp. 1347–50.Google Scholar

Ackermann, K., De Jong, J. H. A. L., Kilgarriff, A. and Tugwell, D. 2010. Research Summary: The Pearson International Corpus of Academic English (PICAE). London: Pearson. Available at http://pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RS_PICAE_2010.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

ACL [Association for Computational Linguistics]. 2012. POS Tagging (State of the Art). Available at http://aclweb.org/aclwiki/index.php?title=POS_Tagging_(State_of_the_art) (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Ädel, A. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ädel, A. 2008. ‘Involvement features in writing: Do time and interaction trump register awareness?’, in Gilquin, , Papp, and Díez-Bedmar, (eds.), pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Ädel, A. and Erman, B. 2012. ‘Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach’, English for Specific Purposes 31(2): 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adolphs, S. and Carter, R. 2013. Spoken Corpus Linguistics: From Monomodal to Multimodal. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adolphs, S. and Knight, D. 2010. ‘Building a spoken corpus: What are the basics?’, in O’Keeffe, and McCarthy, (eds.), pp. 38–52.Google Scholar

Ahn, C. 2011. Automatically Detecting Authors’ Native Language. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. Available at http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2011/March/11Mar_Ahn.pdf (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Aijmer, K. 2002. ‘Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage’, in Granger, S., Hung, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar

Aijmer, K. 2004. ‘Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage’, Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aijmer, K. 2005. ‘Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage’, in Granger, S., Hung, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar

Aijmer, K. 2009. ‘So er I just sort of I dunno I think it’s just because… A corpus study of I don’t know and dunno in learner spoken English’, Language and Computers 68(1): 151–68.Google Scholar

Aijmer, K. 2011. ‘Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2): 231–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldabe, I. 2011. Automatic Exercise Generation Based on Corpora and Natural Language Processing Techniques. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (Universidad del País Vasco). Available at http://purl.org/net/Aldabe-11.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. 1996. ‘Do corpora have a role in language assessment?’, in Thomas, J. A. and Short, M. H. (eds.), Using Corpora for Language Research. London: Longman, pp. 248–59.Google Scholar

Alexopoulou, T. 2008. ‘Building new corpora for English Profile’, Research Notes 33: 15–19.Google Scholar

Alexopoulou, T., Yannakoudakis, H. and Briscoe, T. 2010. ‘From discriminative features to learner grammars: A data driven approach to learner corpora’. Presentation at the Second Language Research Forum, Maryland, October 2010. Available at http://purl.org/net/Alexopoulou.ea-10.pdf (last accessed on 12 July 2014).Google Scholar

Alexopoulou, T., Yannakoudakis, H. and Salamoura, A. 2013. ‘Classifying intermediate learner English: A data-driven approach to learner corpora’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 11–23.Google Scholar

Allen, D. 2009. ‘Lexical bundles in learner writing: An analysis of formulaic language in the ALESS Learner Corpus’, Komaba Journal of English Education 1: 105–27.Google Scholar

Alpaydin, E. 2004. Introduction to Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Al-Rfou’, R. 2012. ‘Detecting English writing styles for non-native speakers’, Computing Research Repository abs/1211.0498. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0498 (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Alsop, S. and Nesi, H. 2009. ‘Issues in the development of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus’, Corpora 4(1): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ALTE Members 1998. Multilingual Glossary of Language Testing Terms. Studies in Language Testing 6. UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Altenberg, B. 1997. ‘Exploring the Swedish component of the International Corpus of Learner English’, in Lewandowska-Tomaszcyk, B. and Melia, P. J. (eds.), PALC’97: Practical Applications in Language Corpora. Lódz University Press, pp. 119–32.Google Scholar

Altenberg, B. 1998. ‘On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations’, in Cowie, A. P. (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford University Press, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar

Altenberg, B. 2002. ‘Using bilingual corpus evidence in learner corpus research’, in Granger, S., Hung, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar

Altenberg, B. and Granger, S. 2001. ‘The grammatical and lexical patterning of make in native and non-native student writing’, Applied Linguistics 22(2): 173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altenberg, B. and Tapper, M. 1998. ‘The use of adverbial connectors in Swedish EFL texts in English’, in Granger, (ed.), pp. 80–93.Google Scholar

Amaral, L. and Meurers, D. 2008. ‘From recording linguistic competence to supporting inferences about language acquisition in context: Extending the conceptualization of student models for intelligent computer-assisted language learning’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(4): 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amaral, L. and Meurers, D. 2009. ‘Little things with big effects: On the identification and interpretation of tokens for error diagnosis in ICALL’, CALICO Journal 26(3): 580–91. Available at www.equinoxpub.com/journals/index.php/CALICO/article/view/23061/19067 (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Amaral, L. and Meurers, D. 2011. ‘On using intelligent computer-assisted language learning in real-life foreign language teaching and learning’, ReCALL 23(1): 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amaral, L., Meurers, D. and Ziai, R. 2011. ‘Analyzing learner language: Towards a flexible NLP architecture for intelligent language tutors’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambridge, B. and Lieven, E. V. M. 2011. Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, G. 2011. ‘Corpus-based pragmatics I: Qualitative studies’, in Bublitz, and Norrick, (eds.), pp. 587–627.Google Scholar

Andersen, Ø. E. 2011. ‘Semi-automatic ESOL error annotation’, English Profile Journal 2(1): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2041536211000018 (last accessed on 12 April 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Ø. E., Yannakoudakis, H., Barker, F. and Parish, T. 2013. ‘Developing and testing a self-assessment and tutoring system’, in Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Atlanta, GA, 13 June 2013. Stroudsburg, PA: The Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 32–41. Available at www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W13/W13-1704.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Andreu Andrés, M. A., Astor Guardiola, A. A., Boquera Matarredona, M., MacDonald, P., Montero Fleta, B. and Pérez Sabater, C. 2010. ‘Analysing EFL learner output in the MiLC project: An error *it’s, but which tag?’, in Campoy-Cubillo, , Bellés-Fortuño, and Gea-Valor, (eds.), pp. 167–79.Google Scholar

Anthony, L. 2006. AntConc. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ (last accessed on 8 April 2015).Google Scholar

Anthony, L. 2014. AntConc. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ (last accessed on 8 April 2015).Google Scholar

Antoniadis, G., Echinard, S., Kraif, O., Lebarbé, T., Loiseau, M. and Ponton, C. 2004. ‘NLP-based scripting for CALL activities’, in Proceedings of the Workshop on eLearning for Computational Linguistics and Computational Linguistics for eLearning (COLING 2004), August 2004, Geneva, pp. 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arche, M. J. 2008. SPLLOC Transcription Conventions. Available at www.splloc.soton.ac.uk/trancon.html (last accessed on 9 April 2015).Google Scholar

Archer, D., Wilson, A. and Rayson, P. 2002. Introduction to the USAS Category System. Available at http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/usas%20guide.pdf (last accessed on 14 April 2015).Google Scholar

Archer, D., Culpeper, J. and Davies, M. 2008. ‘Pragmatic annotation’, in Lüdeling, and Kytö, (eds.), pp. 613–42.Google Scholar

Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Pennebaker, J. and Schler, J. 2009. ‘Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous text’, Communications of the ACM 52(2): 119–23. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1461959 (last accessed on 13 April 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnon, I. and Snider, N. 2010. ‘More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases’, Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artstein, R. and Poesio, M. 2008. ‘Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics’, Computational Linguistics 34(4): 555–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aston, G. 2000. ‘Corpora and language teaching’, in Burnard, and McEnery, (eds.), pp. 7–17.Google Scholar

Atkins, S., Clear, J. and Ostler, N. 1992. ‘Corpus design criteria’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 7(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attali, Y. and Burstein, J. 2006. ‘Automated essay scoring with e-rater^® v.2’, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 4(3). Available at http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1650/1492 (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Atwell, E. 2008. ‘Development of tagsets for part-of-speech tagging’, in Lüdeling, and Kytö, (eds.), pp. 501–27.Google Scholar

Atwell, E., Howarth, P. and Souter, C. 2003. ‘The ISLE corpus: Italian and German spoken learners’ English’, ICAME Journal 27: 5–18.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1971. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Avanzi, M., Dubosson, P., Schwab, S. and Obin, N. 2012. ‘Accentual transfer from Swiss-German to French. A study of “français fédéral”’, in Proceedings of Interspeech, pp. 106–10.Google Scholar

Axelsson, M. W. 2000. ‘USE – The Uppsala Student English Corpus: An instrument for needs analysis’, ICAME Journal 24: 155–7.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baayen, R. H. 2010. ‘A real experiment is a factorial experiment?’, The Mental Lexicon 5(1): 149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. and Gulikers, L. 1995. The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. and Bates, D. M. 2008. ‘Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items’, Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babbington, C. 1869. Polychcronicon Ranulphi Higden Monachi Cestrensis, together with the English Translations of John Trevisa and of an Unknown Writer of the Fifteenth Century, Volume II. London: Longman, Greens and Co.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. 1996. Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Back, J. 2012. ‘Use of hedging in Korean EFL learners’ academic writing: A corpus-based approach’, in Barlow, M., Basturkmen, H. and Li, Q. (eds.), Abstracts of the First Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference. DALSL, The University of Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 28–30. Available at http://corpling.com/conf/Abstracts.pdf (last accessed on 9 April 2015).Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Baddeley, A. D. 2000. ‘The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?’, Trends in Cognitive Science 4(11): 417–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bailey, S. 2008. Content Assessment in Intelligent Computer-Aided Language Learning: Meaning Error Diagnosis for English as a Second Language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University. Available at https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:66617 (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Baker, P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballier, N. and Martin, Ph. 2013. ‘Developing corpus interoperability for phonetic investigation of learner corpora’, in Díaz-Negrillo, , Ballier, and Thompson, (eds.), pp. 33–64.Google Scholar

Balogh, J., Bernstein, J., Cheng, J. and Townshend, B. 2007. ‘Automatic evaluation of reading accuracy: Assessing machine scores’, in Proceedings of the Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE) Workshop, 2007. Farmington, PA, pp. 112–15.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. ‘The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use of learners’ narratives’, in Bouton, L. and Kachru, Y. (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, pp. 144–61.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1999. ‘Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics’, Language Learning 49: 677–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2002. ‘A new starting point?’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 189–98.Google Scholar

Barfield, A. and Gyllstad, H. 2009a. ‘Introduction: Researching L2 collocation knowledge and development’, in Barfield, and Gyllstad, (eds.), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Barfield, A. and Gyllstad, H. (eds.) 2009b. Researching Collocations in Another Language: Multiple Interpretations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, F. 2004. ‘Using corpora in language testing’, Modern English Teacher 13(2): 63–7.Google Scholar

Barlow, M. 1999. MonoConc Pro. Houston, TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar

Barlow, M. 2004. Collocate. Houston, TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar

Barlow, M. 2005. ‘Computer-based analyses of learner language’, in Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press, pp. 332–57.Google Scholar

Barlow, M. 2013. ‘Individual differences and usage-based grammar’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barni, M. and Gallina, F. 2009. ‘Il corpus LIPS (Lessico dell’italiano parlato da stranieri): Problemi di trattamento delle forme e di lemmatizzazione’, in Proceedings of the Conference of Italian L2 Corpora: Technologies, Methods, Theoretical Insights, Pavia, 22– 23 November 2007. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni, pp. 139–51.Google Scholar

Baroni, M., Lenci, A. and Onnis, L. 2007. ‘ISA meets Lara: An incremental word space model for cognitively plausible simulations of semantic learning’, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition, 2007. Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar

Barron, A. 2002. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bartkova, K., Delais-Roussarie, E. and Santiago-Vargas, F. 2012. ‘PROSOTRAN: A tool to annotate prosodically non-standard data’, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody Conference 2012. Shanghai, China.Google Scholar

Bartning, I. 2000. ‘Gender agreement in L2 French: preadvanced vs advanced learners’, Studia Linguistica 54(2): 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartning, I. 2002. ‘La variété avancée et sa place dans les phases acquisitionnelles d’une langue étrangère’, in Bartning, I., Falk, J., Fant, L., Forsgren, M., Jacobsson, R.-M. and Nystedt, J. (eds.), Mélanges publiés en hommage à Gunnel Engwall. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Bartning, I. and Forsberg, F. 2006. ‘Les séquences préfabriquées à travers les stades de développement en français L2’, in Actes du 16e congrès des romanistes scandinaves. Department of Language and Culture, Roskilde University. Available at http://rudar.ruc.dk/bitstream/1800/8479/1/Artikel93.pdf (last accessed on 10 April 2015).Google Scholar

Bartning, I. and Schlyter, S. 2004a. ‘Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2’, Journal of French Language Studies 14: 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartning, I. and Schlyter, S. 2004b. Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2 – version étendue. Available at www.fraita.su.se/interfra (last accessed on 10 April 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barzilay, R. and Lapata, M. 2008. ‘Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach’, Computational Linguistics 34(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, E. and Goodman, J. 1997. ‘On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon’, Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 507–84.Google Scholar

Bayley, R. and Tarone, E. 2011. ‘Variationist perspectives’, in Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 42–56.Google Scholar

Behrens, H. (ed.) 2008. Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: History, Methods, Perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belz, J. A. 2005. ‘Telecollaborative foreign language study: A personal overview of praxis and research’, in Hiple, D. and Thompson, I. (eds.), Selected Papers from the 2004 NFLRC Symposium on Distance Education, Distributed Learning, and Language Instruction. Honolulu, Hawaii: National Foreign Language Resource Center. Available at http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW44/belz.htm (last accessed on 9 April 2015).Google Scholar

Belz, J. A. 2006. ‘At the intersection of telecollaboration, learner corpus analysis, and L2 pragmatics: Considerations for language program direction’, in Belz, J. and Thorne, S. (eds.), Internet-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, pp. 207–46.Google Scholar

Belz, J. A. 2007. ‘The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27: 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belz, J. A. and Kinginger, C. 2002. ‘The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies’, The Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 59(2): 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belz, J. A. and Kinginger, C. 2003. ‘Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms’, Language Learning 53(4): 591–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belz, J. A. and Vyatkina, N. 2008. ‘The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction’, Language Learning and Technology 12(3): 33–52.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bergman, M. 2008. Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernardini, S. 2000. ‘Systematising serendipity: Proposals for concordancing large corpora with language learners’, in Burnard, and McEnery, (eds.), pp. 225–34.Google Scholar

Bernini, G. 2000. ‘Negative items and negation strategies in nonnative Italian’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(3): 399–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, J., Cohen, M., Murveit, H., Rtischev, D. and Weintraub, M. 1990. ‘Automatic evaluation and training in English pronunciation’, in Proceedings of the ICSLP-90: 1990 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Kobe, Japan, pp. 1185–8.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J., Van Moere, A. and Cheng, J. 2010. ‘Validating automated speaking tests’, Language Testing 27: 355–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, C. T. 1995. ‘A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception’, in Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 171–203.Google Scholar

Bestgen, Y. and Granger, S. 2011. ‘Categorising spelling errors to assess L2 writing’, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning 21(2/3): 235–52.Google Scholar

Bestgen, Y. and Granger, S. 2014. ‘Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach’, in Connor-Linton, J. and Polio, C. (eds.), Comparing Perspectives on L2 Writing: Multiple Analyses on a Common Corpus. Special issue of Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 28–41. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bestgen, Y., Granger, S. and Thewissen, J. 2012. ‘Error patterns and automatic L1 identification’, in Jarvis, and Crossley, (eds.), pp. 127–53.Google Scholar

Bhat, S., Hasegawa-Johnson, M. and Sproat, R. 2010. ‘Automatic fluency assessment by signal-level measurement of spontaneous speech’, in Proceedings of Interspeech Satellite Workshop on Second Language Studies: Acquisition, Learning, Education and Technology, 2012. Makuhari, Japan.Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. J. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. J. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. 2010. ‘Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use’, in Heine, B. and Narrog, N. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford University Press, pp. 159–91.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Conrad, S. 2003 [2001]. ‘Register variation: A corpus approach’, in Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 175–96.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Conrad, S. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. 2004. ‘“If you look at…”: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks’, Applied Linguistics 25: 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Clark, V., Cortes, V., Csomay, E. and Urzua, A. 2004. Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus. Report Number: RM–04–03, Supplemental Report Number: TOEFL–MS–25, Princeton: Educational Testing Service. Available at www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-04-03.pdf (last accessed on 10 April 2015).Google Scholar

Biber, D., Csomay, E., Jones, J. and Keck, C. 2004. ‘A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers’, in Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics. A Multidimensional Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Jones, J. K. 2009. ‘Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics’, in Lüdeling, and Kytö, (eds.), pp. 1286–304.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Reppen, R. 1998. ‘Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses’, in Granger, (ed.), pp. 145–58.Google Scholar

Biemiller, A. and Slonim, N. 2001. ‘Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition’, Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 498–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigelow, M. and Watson, J. 2012. ‘Educational level and L2 learning’, in Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 461–75.Google Scholar

Bigi, B. and Hirst, D. 2012. ‘Speech Phonetization Alignment and Syllabification (SPPAS): A tool for the automatic analysis of speech prosody’, in Proceedings of Speech Prosody Conference 2012. Shanghai, China, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar

Bigi, B., Péri, P. and Bertrand, R. 2012. ‘Orthographic transcription: Which enrichment is required for phonetization?’, in Proceedings of the Language Resource and Evaluation Conference. Istanbul, pp. 1756–63.Google Scholar

Birch-Bécaas, S. and Cooke, R. 2012. ‘Raising collective awareness of rhetorical strategies. Using an online writing tool to demonstrate discourse moves in the ESP classroom’, in Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S. and Rowley-Jolivet, E. (eds.), Corpus-informed Research and Learning in ESP. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 239–60.Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 2009. ‘Age and the end state of second language acquisition’, in Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds.), New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingley: Emerald Group, pp. 401–24.Google Scholar

Blache, Ph., Ferré, G. and Rauzy, S. 2007. ‘An XML coding scheme for multimodal corpus annotation’, in Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics, Birmingham.Google Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, C. and Martin, Ph. 2011. ‘Structuration prosodique, dernière réorganisation avant énonciation’, Langue française 170: 127–42.Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. 1983. ‘The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity’, Language Learning 33(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, J. 2009. ‘The design of an online concordancing program for teaching about reporting verbs’, Language Learning and Technology 13(1): 59–78.Google Scholar

Bloch, J. 2010. ‘A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devices in academic papers’, Journal of Writing Research 2(2): 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blom, E., Paradis, J. and Duncan, T. S. 2012. ‘Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular - s in child L2 English’, Language Learning 62(3): 965–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. 1989. ‘Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)’, Applied Linguistics 5(3): 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhmová, A., Hajič, J., Hajičová, E. and Hladká, B. 2003. ‘The Prague Dependency Treebank’, in Abeillé, A. (ed.), Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 103–27.Google Scholar

Bolly, C. 2011. Phraséologie et collocations. Approche sur corpus en français L1 et L2. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonaventura, P., Howarth, P. and Menzel, W. 2000. ‘Phonetic annotation of a non-native speech corpus’, in Proceedings of the Integrating Speech Technology in (Language) Learning (InSTIL) Conference, 29–30 August 2000. Dundee, UK, pp. 10–17. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.38.1229&rep=rep1&type=pdf (last accessed on 8 April 2015).Google Scholar

Bondi, M. and Scott, M. (eds.) 2010. Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonilla, C. 2015. ‘From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish’, Second Language Research 31(1): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borin, L. and Prütz, K. 2004. ‘New wine in old skins? A corpus investigation of L1 syntactic transfer in learner language’, in Aston, G., Bernardini, S. and Stewart, D. (eds.), Corpora and Language Learners. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boström-Aronsson, M. 2003. ‘On clefts and information structure in Swedish EFL writing’, in Granger, S. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.), Extending the Scope of Corpus-based Research. New Applications, New Challenges. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 197–210.Google Scholar

Boulton, A. 2010. ‘Learning outcomes from corpus consultation’, in Moreno, M., Serrano Valverde, J. F. and Calzada Pérez, M. (eds.), Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching. London: Equinox, pp. 129–44.Google Scholar

Boulton, A. 2012. ‘Corpus consultation for ESP: A review of empirical research’, in Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S. and Rowley-Jolivet, E. (eds.), Corpus-informed Research and Learning in ESP. Issues and Applications. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 261–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulton, A. and Tyne, H. 2014. Des documents authentiques aux corpus. Démarches pour l’apprentissage des langues. Paris: Didier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, A. 2012. Detecting and Diagnosing Grammatical Errors for Beginning Learners of German: From Learner Corpus Annotation to Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University. Available at http://purl.org/net/Boyd-12.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Boyd, A., Dickinson, M. and Meurers, D. 2008. ‘On detecting errors in dependency treebanks’, Research on Language and Computation 6(2): 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, A., Zepf, M. and Meurers, D. 2012. ‘Informing determiner and preposition error correction with word clusters’, in Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA7) at NAACL-HLT, 2012. Montreal, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 208–15.Google Scholar

Brand, C. and Götz, S. 2011. ‘Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language: A multi-method approach’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2): 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brand, C. and Kämmerer, S. 2006. ‘The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI): Compiling the German component’, in Braun, S., Kohn, K. and Mukherjee, J. (eds.), Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 127–40.Google Scholar

Brants, T. 2000. ‘TnT – A statistical part-of-speech tagger’, in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Seattle, WA, pp. 224–31. Available at http://aclweb.org/anthology/A00-1031.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Braun, S. 2005. ‘From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents’, ReCALL 17(1): 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breckle, M. and Zinsmeister, H. 2013. ‘L1 transfer versus fixed chunks: A learner corpus-based study of L2 German’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 25–36.Google Scholar

Breeze, R. 2007. ‘How personal is this text? Researching writer and reader presence in student writing using WordSmith Tools’, CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning 1: 14–21.Google Scholar

Bretz, F., Hothorn, T. and Westfall, P. 2010. Multiple Comparisons Using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Brill, E. 1999. ‘Corpus-based rules’, in van Halteren, (ed.), pp. 247–62.Google Scholar

Brill, E. and Moore, R. C. 2000. ‘An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction’, in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Hong Kong: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 286–93.Google Scholar

Briscoe, T., Carroll, J. and Watson, R. 2006. ‘The second release of the RASP system’, in Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Interactive Presentation Sessions, Sydney, 17–18 July 2006. Stroudsburg, PA: The Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 77–80. Available at www.aclweb.org/anthology/P06-4020 (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Briscoe, T., Medlock, B. and Andersen, Ø. E. 2010. Automated Assessment of ESOL Free Text Examinations. University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, TR-790. Available at www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-790.pdf (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Brooke, J. and Hirst, G. 2012a. ‘Robust, lexicalized native language identification’, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2012), December 2012. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, pp. 391–407. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.379.4451 (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Brooke, J. and Hirst, G. 2012b. ‘Measuring interlanguage: Native language identification with L1-influence metrics’, in Proceedings of the 8th ELRA Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012). Istanbul. Available at www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/129_Paper.pdf (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Brooke, J. and Hirst, G. 2013. ‘Native language detection with “cheap” learner corpora’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 37–47.Google Scholar

Brown, A. 2007. Crosslinguistic Influence in First and Second Languages: Convergence in Speech and Gesture. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, MPI Series in Psycholinguistics, 47. Available at pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:58373:3/component/escidoc:58374/Brown_2007_crosslinguistic.pdf (last accessed on 10 April 2010).Google Scholar

Brown, A. and Gullberg, M. 2008. ‘Bidirectional crosslinguistic influence in L1-L2 encoding of manner in speech and gesture: A study of Japanese speakers of English’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(2): 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, G. and Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, H. D. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Brown, J. and Eskenazi, M. 2005. ‘Student, text and curriculum modeling for reader-specific document retrieval’, in Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Phoenix, AZ. Available at http://purl.org/net/Brown.Eskenazi-05.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Brown, K. (ed.) 2006. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (14 volumes), 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Brown, M. T. and Wicker, L. R. 2000. ‘Discriminant analysis’, in Tinsley, H. E. A. and Brown, S. D. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modelling. New York: Academic Press, pp. 209–35.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bublitz, W. 1999. ‘Introduction: Views of coherence’, in Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. and Ventola, E. (eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. How to Create it and How to Describe it. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

Bublitz, W. and Norrick, N. R. (eds.) 2011. Handbook of Pragmatics, Volume 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bunting, J. D., Diniz, L. and Reppen, R. 2013. Grammar and Beyond 4. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burnard, L. (ed.) 2004. BNC Baby. CD-ROM. Research and Technology Service, Oxford University.Google Scholar

Burnard, L. 2005. ‘Metadata for corpus work’, in Wynne, M. (ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 30–46. Available at www.ahds.ac.uk/creating/guides/linguistic-corpora/ (last accessed on 8 April 2015).Google Scholar

Burnard, L. and McEnery, T. (eds.) 2000. Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Burstein, J., Chodorow, M. and Leacock, C. 2004. ‘Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing evaluation service’, AI Magazine 25(3): 27–36.Google Scholar

Burstein, J., Shore, J., Sabatini, J., Moulder, B., Holtzman, S. and Pedersen, T. 2012. The Language Muse System: Linguistically Focused Instructional Authoring. ETS research report #RR-12–21. Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar

Burton, G. 2012. ‘Corpora and coursebooks: Destined to be strangers forever?’, Corpora 7(1): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buttery, P. and Caines, A. 2012. ‘Normalising frequency counts to account for “opportunity of use” in learner corpora’, in Tono, , Kawaguchi, and Minegishi, (eds.), pp. 187–204.Google Scholar

Buysse, L. 2012. ‘So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech’, Journal of Pragmatics 44(13): 1764–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buysse, L. 2014. ‘We went to the restroom or something. General extenders and stuff in the speech of Dutch Learners of English’, in Romero-Trillo, (ed.), pp. 213–37.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2002. ‘Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bykh, S. and Meurers, D. 2012. ‘Native language identification using recurring n-grams – Investigating abstraction and domain dependence’, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2012), December 2012. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, pp. 425–40. Available at http://aclweb.org/anthology//C/C12/C12-1027.pdf (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Bylund, E. and Athanasopoulos, P. 2014. ‘Linguistic relativity in SLA: Towards a new research programme’, Language Learning 64(4): 952–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. and Norris, J. M. 2010. ‘Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment’ [Monograph], The Modern Language Journal 94(S1).Google Scholar

Cahill, A., Madnani, N., Tetreault, J. and Napolitano, D. 2013. ‘Robust systems for preposition error correction using Wikipedia revisions’, in Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 507–17.Google Scholar

Callies, M. 2008. ‘Argument realization and information packaging in tough movement constructions – A learner-corpus-based investigation’, in Gabrys-Barker, D. (ed.), Morphosyntactic Issues in Second Language Acquisition Studies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callies, M. 2009. Information Highlighting in Advanced Learner English: The Syntax–Pragmatics Interface in Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callies, M. 2012. ‘Triangulation’, in Kortmann, B. (ed.), Theories and Methods in Linguistics (Wörterbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft (WSK) Online, volume 11). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Callies, M. 2013a. ‘Advancing the research agenda of interlanguage pragmatics: The role of learner corpora’, in Romero-Trillo, (ed.), pp. 9–36.Google Scholar

Callies, M. 2013b. ‘Agentivity as a determinant of lexico-grammatical variation in L2 academic writing’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3): 357–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M. B. and Zaytseva, E. 2014. ‘Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency’, in Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A. and Hilton, H. (eds.), Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callies, M. and Szczesniak, K. 2008. ‘Argument realization, information status and syntactic weight: A learner-corpus study of the dative alternation’, in Walter, M. and Grommes, P. (eds.), Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten: Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 165–78.Google Scholar

Callies, M. and Zaytseva, E. 2013a. ‘The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE). A new resource for the assessment of writing proficiency in the academic register’. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1): 126–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callies, M. and Zaytseva, E. 2013b. ‘The Corpus of Academic Learner English (CALE) – A new resource for the study and assessment of advanced language proficiency’, in Granger, Gilquin and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 49–60.Google Scholar

Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. 2003. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campillos Llanos, L. 2012. ‘Designing a search interface for a Spanish learner oral corpus: The end-user’s evaluation’, in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012). Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 241–8. Available at www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/574_Paper.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Campoy-Cubillo, M. C., Bellés-Fortuño, B. and Gea-Valor, L. (eds.) 2010. Corpus-based Approaches to English Language Teaching. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Canale, M. and Swain, M. 1980. ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing’, Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capel, A. 2010. ‘A1–B2 vocabulary: Insights and issues arising from the English Profile Wordlists project’, English Profile Journal 1(1). http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S2041536210000048 (last accessed on 12 April 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capel, A. 2012. ‘Completing the English Vocabulary Profile: C1 and C2 vocabulary’, English Profile Journal 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2041536212000013 (last accessed on 12 April 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carletta, J. 1996. ‘Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic’, Computational Linguistics 22(2): 249–54.Google Scholar

Carletta, J., Evert, S., Heid, U., Kilgour, J., Robertson, J. and Voormann, H. 2003. ‘The NITE XML Toolkit: Flexible annotation for multi-modal language data’, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35(3): 353–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsen, C. 2010. ‘CEFR and contrastive rhetoric – What’s the link?’, in Putting the CEFR to Good Use – IATEFL TEA SIG/EALTA Conference Proceedings, Barcelona 2010, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar

Carlsen, C. 2012. ‘Proficiency level: A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora’, Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrell, P. 1982. ‘Cohesion is not coherence’, TESOL Quarterly 17: 479–88.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. 2004. ‘Parsing’, in Mitkov, (ed.), pp. 233–48.Google Scholar

Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, R., McCarthy, M., Mark, G. and O’Keeffe, A. 2011. English Grammar Today. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Castagnoli, S., Ciobanu, D., Kunz, K., Kübler, N. and Volanschi, A. 2011. ‘Designing a learner translation corpus for training purposes’, in Kübler, N. (ed.), Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 221–47.Google Scholar

Castello, E. 2013. ‘Integrating learner corpus data into the assessment of spoken interaction in English in an Italian university context’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 61–74.Google Scholar

Castello, E., Ackerley, K. and Coccetta, F. (eds.) In press. Studies in Learner Corpus Linguistics: Research and Applications for Foreign Language Teaching and Assessment. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cauvin, E. 2013. ‘Intonational phrasing as a potential indicator for establishing prosodic learner profiles’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 75–88.Google Scholar

Cekaite, A. 2007. ‘A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom’, The Modern Language Journal 91(1): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teachers’ Course. Second Edition. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M. and Olshtain, E. 2000. Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B. and Jessner, U. (eds.) 2001. Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chafe, W. 1982. ‘Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature’, in Tannen, D. (ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. and Tannen, D. 1987. ‘The relation between spoken and written language’, Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, A. 2005. ‘Integrating corpus consultation in language learning’, Language Learning and Technology 9(2): 111–25.Google Scholar

Chambers, A. and Le Baron, F. (eds.) 2007. The Chambers–Le Baron Corpus of Research Articles in French / Le Corpus Chambers–Le Baron d’articles de recherche en français. Oxford Text Archive. Available at http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/headers/2527.xml (last accessed on 10 April 2015).Google Scholar

Chang, C.-C. and Lin, C.-J. 2011. ‘LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines’, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2(3): 1–27. Software available at www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/ (last accessed on 13 April 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapelle, C. A. 2001. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaudron, C. 2003. ‘Data collection in SLA research’, in Doughty, C. and Long, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 762–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, H.-I. 2010. ‘Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing’, Arizona Working Papers in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching 17: 27–51.Google Scholar

Chen, H., Wen, Q. and Li, A. 2008. ‘A learner corpus – ESCCL’, in Barbosa, P. A., Madureira, S. and Reis, C. (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Speech Prosody 2008. Campinas, Brazil. Available at http://sprosig.isle.illinois.edu/sp2008/papers/id187.pdf (last accessed on 9 April 2015).Google Scholar

Chen, L. and Yoon, S.-Y. 2011. ‘Detecting structural events for assessing non-native speech’, in Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 19–24 June 2011. Portland, OR, pp. 38–45.Google Scholar

Chen, M. 2013a. ‘Overuse or underuse: A corpus study of English phrasal verb use by Chinese, British and American university students’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3): 408–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, M. 2013b. ‘Phrasal verbs in a longitudinal learner corpus: Quantitative findings’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 89–101.Google Scholar

Chen, P.-C., Hu, K.-C. and Ho, J.-Y. 2009. ‘A study of academic vocabulary used in the abstracts of business and management journals’, Taiwan International ESP Journal 1(1): 51–76.Google Scholar

Chen, Y.-H. and Baker, P. 2010. ‘Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing’, Language Learning and Technology 14(2): 30–49.Google Scholar

Cheng, W., Warren, M. and Xun-Feng, X. 2003. ‘The language learner as language researcher: Putting corpus linguistics on the timetable’, System 31(2): 173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, J. C. K. and Penn, G. 2009. ‘Topological field parsing of German’, in Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1. Morristown, NJ, pp. 64–72. Available at http://aclweb.org/anthology/P09-1008.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Chiarcos, C., Dipper, S., Götze, M., Leser, U., Lüdeling, A., Ritz, J. and Stede, M. 2008. ‘A flexible framework for integrating annotations from different tools and tag sets’, Traitement Automatique des Langues 49(2): 271–93.Google Scholar

Chodorow, M., Dickinson, M., Israel, R. and Tetreault, J. 2012. ‘Problems in evaluating grammatical error detection systems’, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee, pp. 611–28. Available at http://aclweb.org/anthology/C12-1038.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chuang, F.-Y. and Nesi, H. 2006. ‘An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students’, Corpora 1(2): 251–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chuang, F.-Y. and Nesi, H. 2007. ‘GrammarTalk: Developing computer-based materials for the Chinese EAP student’, in Alexander, O. (ed.), Proceedings of the Joint Conference of BALEAP (British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes) and SATEFL (The Scottish Association for the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language) on New Approaches to Materials Development for Language Learning. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 315–30.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. and Pienemann, M. 1983. Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Cobb, T. 1997. ‘Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing?’, System 25(3): 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, T. 2003. ‘Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies’, The Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 59(3): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cobb, T. 2007. ‘Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading’, Language Learning and Technology 11: 38–63.Google Scholar

Cobb, T. and Horst, M. 2011. ‘Does Word Coach coach words?’, CALICO Journal 28(3): 639–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. 1983. ‘The cost of dichotomization’, Applied Psychological Measurement 7(3): 249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collentine, J. and Collentine, K. 2013. ‘A corpus approach to studying structural convergence in task-based Spanish L2 interactions’, in McDonough, K. and Mackey, A. (eds.), Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 167–87.Google Scholar

Collentine, J. and Freed, B. F. 2004a. ‘Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collentine, J. and Freed, B. F. (eds.) 2004b. Learning Context and its Effects on Second Language Acquisition. Special issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2).Google Scholar

Collins-Cobuild English Language Dictionary. 1987. London and Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Comenius, J. 1657. Didactica Magna. English text by Keatinge, M. 1896. The Great Didactic of John Amos Comenius. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar

Coniam, D. 1997. ‘A practical introduction to corpora in a teacher training language awareness programme’, Language Awareness 6: 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coniam, D. 2004. ‘Concordancing oneself: Constructing individual textual profiles’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(2): 271–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conklin, K. and Schmitt, N. 2007. ‘Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?’, Applied Linguistics 28: 1–18.Google Scholar

Connor, U. 1996. Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-language Writing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, U. 2002. ‘New directions in contrastive rhetoric’, TESOL Quarterly 36(4): 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, U. 2008. ‘Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric’, in Connor, U., Nagelhout, E. and Rozychi, W. (eds.), Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, U., Precht, K. and Upton, T. 2005. ‘Business English: Learner data from Belgium, Finland, and the U.S.’, in Granger, S., Hung, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 175–94.Google Scholar

Conrad, S. 2002. ‘Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, G. 2011. ‘Discourse analysis’, in Simpson, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 431–44.Google Scholar

Cook, V. 1999. ‘Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching’, TESOL Quarterly 33: 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, V. 2001. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Cook, V. 2003a. ‘Introduction: The changing L1 in the L2 user’s mind’, in Cook, (ed.), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Cook, V. (ed.) 2003b. Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cope, B. and Kalantz, M. (eds.) 2000. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. 1967. ‘The significance of learner’s errors’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(1–4): 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. 1971. ‘Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 9(2): 147–60. Reprinted in Richards, J. C. (ed.) 1974. Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman, pp. 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. 1973. Introducing Applied Linguistics. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cordier, C. 2013. The Presence, Nature and Role of Formulaic Sequences in English Advanced Learners of French: A Longitudinal Study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Newcastle University.Google Scholar

Cornillie, F., Thorne, S. L. and Desmet, P. (eds.) 2012. Digital Games for Language Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Special issue of ReCALL 24(3).Google Scholar

Cortes, V. 2004. ‘Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology’, English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotos, E. 2014. ‘Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data’, ReCALL 26(2): 202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. 2008. The Teacher’s Grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, R., Choi, H. E. and Kim, D. H. 2003. ‘Four questions for error diagnosis and correction in CALL’, CALICO Journal 20(3): 451–63.Google Scholar

Cowan, R., Choo, J. and Lee, G. S. 2014. ‘ICALL for improving Korean L2 writers’ ability to edit grammatical errors’, Language Learning and Technology 18(3): 193–207.Google Scholar

Cowie, A. P. 1994. ‘Phraseology’, in Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford University Press, pp. 3168–71.Google Scholar

Cowie, A. P. 1998. ‘Phraseological dictionaries: Some East-West comparisons’, in Cowie, A. P. (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford University Press, pp. 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowie, A. P. 2006. ‘Phraseology’, in Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Volume 9, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 579–85.Google Scholar

Coxhead, A. 2000. ‘A new academic word list’, TESOL Quarterly 34(2): 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crewe, W. J. 1990. ‘The illogic of logical connectors’, ELT Journal 44: 316–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Cobb, T. and McNamara, D. S. 2013. ‘Comparing count-based and band-based indices of word frequency: Implications for active vocabulary research and pedagogical applications’, System 41: 965–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossley, S. A. and Louwerse, M. 2007. ‘Multi-dimensional register classification using bigrams’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(4): 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossley, S. A. and McNamara, D. S. 2011. ‘Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence’, in Carlson, L., Hoelscher, C. and Shipley, T. F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1236–41. Available at www2.gsu.edu/~wwwesl/Files/ALSL/Cros_Text_Coherence_and_Judgments_of_Essay_Quality.pdf (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A. and McNamara, D. S. 2012. ‘Detecting the first language of second language writers using automated indices of cohesion, lexical sophistication, syntactic complexity and conceptual knowledge’, in Jarvis, and Crossley, (eds.), pp. 106–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossley, S. A. and Salsbury, T. 2011. ‘The development of lexical bundle accuracy and production in English second language speakers’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, D. 1980. A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. 2007. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuban, L. 1986. Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Cunnings, I. 2012. ‘An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers’, Second Language Research 28: 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dagneaux, E., Denness, S. and Granger, S. 1998. ‘Computer-aided error analysis’, System 26(2): 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., Granger, S., Meunier, F., Neff, J. and Thewissen, J. 2005. Error Tagging Manual, Version 1.2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar

Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., Granger, S., Meunier, F., Neff, J. and Thewissen, J. 2008. Error Tagging Manual, Version 1.3. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar

Dagut, M. and Laufer, B. 1982. ‘How intralingual are “intralingual errors”?’, in Nickel, G. and Nehls, D. (eds.), Error Analysis, Contrastive Linguistics and Second Language Learning. Papers from the 6th International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag: pp. 19–41.Google Scholar

Dahlmeier, D., Ng, H. T. and Wu, S. M. 2013. ‘Building a large annotated corpus of learner English: The NUS Corpus of Learner English’, in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 13 June 2013. Atlanta, GA, pp. 22–31. Available at www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~nght/pubs/bea2013_nucle.pdf (last accessed on 10 April 2015).Google Scholar

Dale, R., Anisimoff, I. and Narroway, G. 2012. ‘HOO 2012: A report on the preposition and determiner error correction shared task’, in The 7th Workshop on the Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 54–62.Google Scholar

Dale, R. and Kilgarriff, A. 2010. ‘Helping Our Own: Text massaging for computational linguistics as a new shared task’, in Kelleher, J. D., Mac Namee, B. and Van der Sluis, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Natural Language Generation Conference. Dublin, pp. 261–66.Google Scholar

Dale, R. and Kilgarriff, A. 2011. ‘Helping Our Own: The HOO 2011 pilot shared task’, in Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG). Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 242–9.Google Scholar

Daller, H., Milton, J. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.) 2007. Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daller, H., Van Hout, R. and Treffers-Daller, J. 2003. ‘Lexical richness in spontaneous speech of bilinguals’, Applied Linguistics 24(2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daudaravičius, V. and Marcinkevičienė, R. 2004. ‘Gravity counts for the boundaries of collocations’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(2): 321–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, A. 2008. ‘A developmental perspective on productive lexical knowledge in L2 oral interlanguage’, Journal of French Language Studies 18(3): 315–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

David, A., Myles, F., Rogers, V. and Rule, S. 2009. ‘Lexical development in instructed L2 learners of French: Is there a relationship with morphosyntactic development?’, in Richards, B. J., Daller, M. H., Malvern, D. D., Meara, P., Milton, J. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Vocabulary Studies in First and Second Language Acquisition: The Interface between Theory and Application. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 147–63.Google Scholar

Davidson, C. 2009. ‘Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(2): 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T. and McNamara, T. 1999. Dictionary of Language Testing. Studies in Language Testing 8. UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, M. 2010. ‘The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English’, Literature and Linguistics Computing 25(4): 447–64.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. and Dewaele, J.-M. 2011a. ‘Introduction’, in De Angelis, and Dewaele, (eds.), pp. vii–xv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Angelis, G. and Dewaele, J.-M. (eds.) 2011b. New Trends in Cross-linguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. and Verspoor, M. 2013. ‘Dynamic Systems Theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development’, in García Mayo, M. P., Gutierrez Mangado, M. J. and Martínez Adrián, M. (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Cock, S. 2004. ‘Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech’, Belgian Journal of English Language and Literature New Series 2: 225–46.Google Scholar

De Cock, S. 2007. ‘Routinised building blocks in native speaker and learner speech: Clausal sequences in the spotlight’, in Campoy, M.-C. and Luzón, M.-J. (eds.), Spoken Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 217–33.Google Scholar

De Cock, S. and Granger, S. 2005. ‘Computer learner corpora and monolingual learners’ dictionaries: The perfect match’, Lexicographica 20: 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Cock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. and McEnery, T. 1998. ‘An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners’, in Granger, (ed.), pp. 67–79.Google Scholar

De Cock, S. and Paquot, M. 2010. ‘The monolingual learners’ dictionary as a productive tool: The contribution of learner corpora’, in Campoy-Cubillo, , Bellés-Fortuño, and Gea-Valor, (eds.), pp. 195–204.Google Scholar

De Felice, R. 2008. Automatic Error Detection in Non-Native English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, St Catherine’s College, University of Oxford. Available at http://purl.org/net/DeFelice-08.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

De Felice, R., Darby, J., Fisher, A. and Peplow, D. 2013. ‘A classification scheme for annotating speech acts in a business email corpus’, ICAME Journal 37: 71–105.Google Scholar

De Felice, R. and Deane, P. 2012. Identifying Speech Acts in E-mails: Toward Automated Scoring of the TOEIC(R) E-mail Task. ETS Research Report No. RR-12–16. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

De Felice, R. and Pulman, S. G. 2008. ‘A classifier-based approach to preposition and determiner error correction in L2 English’, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). Manchester, pp. 169–76.Google Scholar

de Haan, P. 1984. ‘Problem-oriented tagging of English corpus data’, in Aarts, J. and Meijs, W. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora in English Language Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 123–39.Google Scholar

de Haan, P. 2000. ‘Tagging non-native English with the TOSCA-ICLE tagger’, in Mair, and Hundt, (eds.), pp. 69–79.Google Scholar

de Haan, P. and van der Haagen, M. 2013. ‘The search for sophisticated writing in advanced EFL writing: A longitudinal study’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 103–16.Google Scholar

De Knop, S. 2015. ‘Conceptual tools for the description and acquisition of the German posture verb sitzen’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(1): 127–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Mönnink, I. 2000. ‘Parsing a learner corpus’, in Mair, and Hundt, (eds.), pp. 81–90.Google Scholar

Deane, P. and Gurevich, O. 2008. Applying Content Similarity Metrics to Corpus Data: Differences Between Native and Non-native Speaker Responses To A TOEFL^® Integrated Writing Prompt. Report Number: RR–08–51, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeKeyser, R. 2012. ‘Age effects in second language learning’, in Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 442–60.Google Scholar

Delais-Roussarie, E. and Post, B. 2014. ‘Corpus annotation: Methodology and transcription systems’, in Durand, J., Gut, U. and Kristoffersen, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. Oxford University Press, pp. 46–88.Google Scholar

Demol, A. and Hadermann, P. 2008. ‘An exploratory study of discourse organisation in French L1, Dutch L1, French L2 and Dutch L2 written narratives’, in Gilquin, , Papp, and Díez-Bedmar, (eds.), pp. 255–82.Google Scholar

Deshors, S. C. 2015. ‘A multifactorial approach to linguistic structure in L2 spoken and written registers’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(1): 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detey, S. 2012. ‘Coding an L2 phonological corpus: From perceptual assessment to non-native speech models – An illustration with French nasal vowels’, in Tono, , Kawaguchi, and Minegishi, (eds.), pp. 229–50.Google Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A. 2007. A Fine-Grained Error Tagger for Learner Corpora. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Jaén, Spain. Revised version published in 2009 as EARS: A User’s Manual. Munich: LINCOM Academic Reference Books.Google Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A. 2009. EARS: A User’s Manual. Munich: LINCOM Academic Reference Books.Google Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N. and Thompson, P. (eds.) 2013. Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A. and Fernández-Domínguez, J. 2006. ‘Error tagging systems for learner corpora’, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 19: 83–102.Google Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A., Meurers, D., Valera, S. and Wunsch, H. 2010. ‘Towards interlanguage POS annotation for effective learner corpora in SLA and FLT’, Language Forum 36(1–2): 139–54. Available at http://purl.org/dm/papers/diaz-negrillo-et-al-09.html (last accessed on 9 April 2015).Google Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A. and Thompson, P. 2013. ‘Learner corpora: Looking towards the future’, in Díaz-Negrillo, , Ballier, and Thompson, (eds.), pp. 9–30.Google Scholar

Dickinson, M., Brew, C. and Meurers, D. 2013. Language and Computers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dickinson, M. and Meurers, D. 2003. ‘Detecting errors in part-of-speech annotation’, in Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-03). Budapest, pp. 107–14. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1067823 (last accessed on 10 April 2013).Google Scholar

Dickinson, M. and Ragheb, M. 2009. ‘Dependency annotation for learner corpora’, in Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT). Milan, Italy. Available at http://purl.org/net/Dickinson.Ragheb-09.html (last accessed on 12 July 2014).Google Scholar

Diehl, E., Albrecht, H. and Zoch, I. 1991. Lernerstrategien im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Untersuchungen zum Erwerb des deutschen Deklinationssystems. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dietrich, R., Klein, W. and Noyau, C. (eds.) 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díez-Bedmar, M. B. 2011. ‘Detecting learning disorders in students’ written production in the foreign language: Are learner corpora of any help?’, Porta Linguarum 15: 35–54.Google Scholar

Díez-Bedmar, M. B. and Casas Pedrosa, A. V. 2011. ‘The use of prepositions by Spanish learners of English at university level: A longitudinal analysis’, in Kübler, N. (ed.), Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 199–218.Google Scholar

Díez-Bedmar, M. B. and Papp, S. 2008. ‘The use of the English article system by Chinese and Spanish learners’, in Gilquin, , Papp, and Díez-Bedmar, (eds.), pp. 147–75.Google Scholar

Dimroth, C. 2013. ‘Learner varieties’, in Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 3256–63.Google Scholar

Dini, L. and Malnati, G. 1993. ‘Weak constraints and preference rules’, in Bennett, P. and Paggio, P. (eds.), Preference in Eurotra. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar

Divjak, D. S. and Gries, St. Th. (eds.) 2012. Frequency Effects in Language Representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domínguez, L. 2013. Understanding Interfaces: Second Language Acquisition and First Language Attrition of Spanish Subject Realization and Word Order Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domínguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M., Mitchell, R. and Myles, F. 2013. ‘The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology’, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(3): 558–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. 2012. ‘Lexical bundles in academic texts by non-native speakers’, Brno Studies in English 38(2): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doolittle, S. 2008. Entwicklung und Evaluierung eines auf dem Stellungsfeldermodell basierenden syntaktischen Annotationsverfahrens für Lernerkorpora innerhalb einer Mehrebenen-Architektur mit Schwerpunkt auf schriftlichen Texten fortgeschrittener Deutschlerner. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Humboldt University. Available at http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/master/doolittle-seanna-2008-10-22/PDF/doolittle.pdf (last accessed on 9 April 2015).Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dudley-Evans, T. and St John, M. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. 2012. ‘Identity, agency and second language acquisition’, in Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 410–26.Google Scholar

DuFon, M. A. and Churchill, E. (eds.) 2006. Language Learners in Study Abroad Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H., Burt, M. and Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Durrant, P. and Doherty, A. 2010. ‘Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2): 125–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durrant, P. and Schmitt, N. 2009. ‘To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47(2): 157–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dzikovska, M., Nielsen, R., Brew, C., Leacock, C., Giampiccolo, D., Bentivogli, L., Clark, P., Dagan, I. and Dang, H. T. 2013. ‘SemEval-2013 task 7: The joint student response analysis and 8th recognizing textual entailment challenge’, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval). Atlanta, GA, pp. 263–74. Available at http://aclweb.org/anthology/S13-2045.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

Ebeling, S. O. 2011. ‘Recurrent word-combinations in English student essays’, Nordic Journal of English Studies 10(1): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebeling, S. O. and Hasselgård, H. 2015. ‘Learners’ and native speakers’ use of recurrent word-combinations across disciplines’, in Gujord, A.K.H., Nacey, S. and Ragnhildstveit, S. (eds.), Learner Corpus Research: LCR 2013 Conference Proceedings. Special issue of Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 6: 87–106. Available at https://bells.uib.no/bells/article/view/810/750 (last accessed on 18 June 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckman, F. R. 2004. ‘From phonemic differences to constraint rankings: Research on second language phonology’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(4): 513–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, R. and Collins, L. 2011. ‘Lexical frequency profiles and Zipf’s Law’, Language Learning 61(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M. and Nakamichi, Y. 2002. ‘The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education’, Language Learning and Technology 6(3): 108–26.Google Scholar

Elbow, P. 1991. ‘Reflections on academic discourse: How it relates to freshmen and colleagues’, College English 53(2): 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 1996. ‘Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18(1): 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 1998. ‘Emergentism, connectionism and language learning’, Language Learning 48(4): 631–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2002. ‘Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2008a. ‘Usage-based and form-focused SLA: The implicit and explicit learning of constructions’, in Tyler, A., Kim, Y. and Takada, M. (eds.), Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2008b. ‘Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focussed learning’, in Long, M. H. and Doughty, C. (eds.), Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 139–58.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2008c. ‘Phraseology: The periphery and the heart of language’, in Meunier, F. and Granger, S. (eds.), Phraseology in Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2011. ‘The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system’, in Simpson, J. (ed.), Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 666–79.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2012a. ‘Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2012b. ‘What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use?’, in Gries, St. Th. and Divjak, D. S. (eds.), Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. 2013. ‘Construction grammar and second language acquisition’, in Hoffmann, and Trousdale, (eds.), pp. 365–78.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009a. ‘Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy’, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009b. ‘Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function’, The Modern Language Journal 93: 370–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. 2006. ‘Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Introduction to the special issue’, Applied Linguistics 27(4): 558–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. 2009. ‘Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage’, Language Learning 59 (Supplement 1): 90–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and O’Donnell, M. B. 2012. ‘Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning?’, in Rebuschat, and Williams, (eds.), pp. 265–304.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Römer, U., Gries, St. Th. and Wulff, S. 2009. ‘Measuring the formulaicity of language’. Paper presented at AAAL 2009, the Annual Conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Denver, CO, 21–24 March 2009.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and Schmidt, R. W. 1997. ‘Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(2): 145–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. and Simpson-Vlach, R. C. 2009. ‘Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education’, in Gilquin, G. (ed.), Corpora and Experimental Methods. Special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1): 61–78.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R. C. and Maynard, C. 2008. ‘Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL’, TESOL Quarterly 42(3): 375–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. 1984. Classroom Second Language Development. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 1992. ‘Learning to communicate in the classroom’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (ed.). 2001. Form-Focused Instruction and Second Language Learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L. 1990. ‘Finding structure in time’, Cognitive Science 14: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elsner, M. and Charniak, E. 2011. ‘Disentangling chat with local coherence models’, in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 19–24 June 2011. Portland, OR, pp. 1179–89.Google Scholar

Engwall, O. 2012. ‘Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 25(1): 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksson, A. 2012. ‘Pedagogical perspectives on bundles: Teaching bundles to doctoral students of biochemistry’, in Thomas, J. and Boulton, A. (eds.), Input, Process and Product. Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora. Brno: Masaryk University Press, pp. 195–211.Google Scholar

Erman, B., Lewis, M. and Fant, L. 2013. ‘Multiword structures in different materials, and with different goals and methodologies’, in Romero-Trillo, (ed.), pp. 77–103.Google Scholar

Eskenazi, M. 2009. ‘An overview of spoken language technology for education’, Speech Communication 51(10): 832–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskildsen, S. W. 2009. ‘Constructing another language – Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition’, Applied Linguistics 30(3): 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskildsen, S. W. 2012. ‘L2 negation constructions at work’, Language Learning 62(2): 335–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskildsen, S. W. and Cadierno, T. 2007. ‘Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics’, in Nenonen, M. and Niemi, J. (eds.), Collocations and Idioms: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, May 19–20, 2007. Joensuu University Press, pp. 86–99.Google Scholar

Espunya, A. 2013. ‘Investigating lexical difficulties of learners in the error-annotated UPF learner translation corpus’, in Granger, , Gilquin, and Meunier, (eds.), pp. 129–37.Google Scholar

Espunya, A. 2014. ‘The UPF learner translation corpus as a resource for translator training’, Language Resources and Evaluation 48(1): 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evanini, K., Higgins, D. and Zechner, K. 2010. ‘Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for transcription of non-native speech’, in Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, 6 June 2010. Los Angeles, pp. 53–6. Available at www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W10/W10-0708.pdf (last accessed on 8 April 2015).Google Scholar

Evert, S. 2005. The Statistics of Word Cooccurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart. Available at http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2005/2371/ (last accessed on 10 April 2015).Google Scholar

Evert, S. 2006. ‘How random is a corpus? The library metaphor’, Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evert, S. 2009. ‘Corpora and collocations’, in Lüdeling, and Kytö, (eds.), pp. 1212–48.Google Scholar

Fan, R., Chang, K., Hsieh, C., Wang, X. and Lin, C. 2008. ‘Liblinear: A library for large linear classification’, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 9: 1871–4. Software available at www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/liblinear/ (last accessed on 13 April 2015).Google Scholar

Farr, F. 2008. ‘Evaluating the use of corpus-based instruction in a language teacher education context: Perspectives from the users’, Language Awareness 17(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar